Readmission rate after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery narrowing

Incidence, Predictors, and Impact of Hospital Readmission After Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease

BACKGROUND

The frequency of and relationship between hospital readmissions and outcomes after revascularization for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to study the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of readmissions following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for LMCAD.

METHODS

In the EXCEL (XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) trial, 1,905 patients with LMCAD were randomized to PCI vs CABG. The cumulative incidence of readmissions was analyzed with multivariable Anderson-Gill and joint frailty models to account for recurrent events and the competing risk of death. The impact of readmission on subsequent mortality within 5-year follow-up was determined in a time-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Within 5 years, 1,868 readmissions occurred in 851 of 1,882 (45.2%) hospital survivors (2.2 ± 1.9 per patient with readmission[s], range 1-16), approximately one-half for cardiovascular causes and one-half for noncardiovascular causes (927 [49.6%] and 941 [50.4%], respectively). One or more readmissions occurred in 463 of 942 (48.6%) PCI patients vs 388 of 940 (41.8%) CABG patients (P = 0.003). After multivariable adjustment, PCI remained an independent predictor of readmission (adjusted HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.10-1.35; P < 0.0001), along with female sex, comorbidities, and the extent of CAD. Readmission was independently associated with subsequent all-cause death, with interaction testing indicating a higher risk after PCI than CABG (adjusted HR: 5.72; 95% CI: 3.42-9.55 vs adjusted HR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.64-4.88, respectively; Pint = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In the EXCEL trial, readmissions during 5-year follow-up after revascularization for LMCAD were common and more frequent after PCI than CABG. Readmissions were associated with an increased risk of all-cause death, more so after PCI than with CABG.

Home health care after discharge is associated with lower readmission rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

We studied the utilization of home health care (HHC) among acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, impact of HHC on and predictors of 30-day readmission.

METHODS

We queried the National Readmission Database (NRD) from 2012 to 2014identify patients with AMI discharged home with (HHC+) and without HHC (HHC-). Linkage provided in the data identified patients who had 30-day readmission, our primary end-point. The probability for each patient to receive HHC was calculated by a multivariable logistic regression. Average treatment of treated weights were derived from propensity scores. Weight-adjusted logistic regression was used to determine impact of HHC on readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 406 237 patients with AMI were discharged home. Patients in the HHC+ cohort (38 215 patients, 9.4%) were older (mean age 77 vs. 60 years P < 0.001), more likely women (53 vs. 26%, P < 0.001), have heart failure (5 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (26 vs. 6%, P < 0.001) and diabetes (35 vs. 26%, P < 0.001). Patients readmitted within 30-days were older with higher rates of diabetes (RR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.37-1.48) and heart failure (RR = 5.8, 95% CI: 5.5-6.2). Unadjusted 30-day readmission rates were 21 and 8% for HHC+ and HHC- patients, respectively. After adjustment, readmission was lower with HHC (21 vs. 24%, RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the United States, AMI patients receiving HHC are older and have more comorbidities; however, HHC was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions

Fundamento

O advento dos stents farmacológicos permitiu que a intervenção coronariana percutânea apresentasse resultados seguros nas lesões de tronco da artéria coronária esquerda.

Objetivos

Analisar os resultados do tratamento percutâneo da lesão não protegida de tronco da artéria coronária com a utilização de ultrassom intravascular.

Métodos

Estudo de série de casos consecutivos realizado no período de janeiro de 2010 a dezembro de 2018. Coletaram-se dados clínicos dos pacientes, assim como escores prognósticos e dados da lesão coronariana. Considerou-se de sucesso a lesão residual menor que 50% à angiografia e a área mínima da luz maior que 6 mm ² ao ultrassom intravascular. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5%.

Resultados

Analisaram-se 107 casos. A lesão multiarterial foi predominante, sendo com maior frequência (39,25%) encontradas lesões em três vasos além do tronco coronariano. O escore SYNTAX apresentou média de 46,80 (DP: 22,95), e 70 (65,42%) pacientes tiveram escore SYNTAX acima de 32 pontos. Considerou-se sucesso angiográfico da intervenção percutânea em 106 (99,06%) pacientes. A taxa geral de evento maior cardíaco e cerebrovascular no desfecho hospitalar foi 6,54%, sendo semelhante nos pacientes com escore SYNTAX ≤ 32 (8,10%) e ≥ 33 (5,71%; p = 0,68) .

Conclusões

A intervenção percutânea em casos de lesão não protegida de tronco coronariano foi realizada com segurança e apresentou ótimos resultados. Atingiu-se alto sucesso angiográfico de tratamento guiado pelo ultrassom intravascular. A taxa de eventos cardíacos e cerebrovasculares maiores foi semelhante entre os pacientes de menor e de maior risco.

Coronary revascularization outcomes in relation to skilled nursing facility use following hospital discharge

Background

Observational analyses comparing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among elderly or frail patients are likely biased by treatment selection. PCI is typically chosen for frail patients, while CABG is more common for patients with good recovery potential.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that skilled nursing facility (SNF) use after revascularization is a measure of relative frailty associated with outcomes following coronary revascularization.

Methods

We used a 20 percent sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who received inpatient PCI or CABG between 2007–2014. Key explanatory variables were the revascularization strategy and SNF use after revascularization. We used Cox regression to evaluate death and repeat revascularization within one year and logistic regression to evaluate SNF use and 30‐day readmissions/death.

Results

CABG patients were 25.1 percentage points [95% confidence interval: 24.7, 25.5] more likely to use SNF following revascularization than inpatient PCI patients. SNF use was associated with a higher death rate (hazard ratio (HR): 3.19 [3.02, 3.37]) and a 16.2 percentage point (15.5, 16.9) increase in 30‐day readmissions/death. Among patients with SNF use, CABG was associated with a decrease in 30‐day readmissions/death compared to PCI.

Conclusions

While CABG was associated with higher rates of SNF use and 30‐day readmission/death overall, CABG was associated with significantly lower rates of 30‐day readmissions/death among patients with SNF use. The findings suggest that caution is needed in treatment selection for patients at high‐risk for SNF use and that selection of inpatient PCI over CABG may be associated with frailty and worse outcomes for some patients.

Thirty-day readmission rates and associated risk factors after coronary artery bypass grafting

Objectives

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is among the most frequently performed cardiac surgical procedures. However, it is associated with high readmission rates for a plethora of causes, which can substantially increase healthcare costs. This study aimed to assess the rates and associated risk factors of 30-day readmissions for CABG patients.

Methods

We conducted this retrospective cohort study at King Abdulaziz Medical City. The study targeted adult patients who underwent CABG between January 1, 2016, and January 31, 2019. Data were extracted from the BEST Care system. Frequencies and percentages were generated for categorical variables. Mean and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to detect readmission risk factors.

Results

Among 534 adult patients, the overall 30-day readmission rate was 16.1% (n = 86). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes mellitus (P = .002), amiodarone use (P = .04), statin use (P = .04), amlodipine use (P = .006), asthma (P < .001), and hyperlipidemia (P = .04) were significantly correlated with 30-day readmission.

Conclusions

Our study showed an estimated 16.1% 30-day readmission rate after CABG. Diabetes mellitus, asthma, hyperlipidemia, and use of medications such as amiodarone, statins, and amlodipine were associated with readmission. Further studies are needed to develop tailored and practical strategies to reduce CABG readmissions and mitigate patient and health care facility burdens.

Readmissions to Hospital After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Factors Associated with Readmissions

BACKGROUND

Readmissions after PCI are a burden to patients and health services that are not well understood.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies of readmission after PCI. Readmission rates and causes of readmission were examined and factors associated with 30-day readmissions were combined using meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies evaluated readmissions after PCI (6,569,690 patients, 31 studies). The 30-day readmission rate varied from 3.3%-15.8%. Beyond 30-days, the readmission rate was 6% at 2 months, 31.5% at 6 months, 18.6-50.4% at 12 months and 26.3-71% beyond 48 months. The pooled proportion of patients with cardiac cause for readmissions ranged from 4.6%-75.3%. The range of rates of 30-day readmissions for reinfarction/stent thrombosis, heart failure, chest pain and bleeding were 2.5%-9.5%, 5.9%-12%, 6.7-38.1% and 0.7-7.5%, respectively. Meta-analysis suggests that female gender (RR 1.25(1.20-1.30), I² = 65.2%), diabetes (RR 1.22(1.20-1.25), I² = 0%), heart failure (RR 1.43(CI 1.28-1.60), I² = 92.8%), renal failure (RR 1.50(1.45-1.55), I² = 0%), chronic lung disease (RR 1.34(1.26-1.44), I² = 87.5%), peripheral artery disease (RR 1.20(1.15-1.25), I² = 46.5%) and cancer (RR 1.35(1.15-1.58), I² = 72.8%) were associated with 30-day readmissions. The average cost of unplanned and all 30-day readmissions has been reported to be $12,636 and $17,576, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We estimate that 1 in 7 patients who undergo PCI are readmitted within 30-days and the rate can rise to up to 3 in 4 patients beyond 3 years. Interventions should be considered to reduce readmissions such as discharge checklists, evaluation of medication compliance at follow-up and prompt management when patients re-present to emergency department.

The effect of a self-help psychoeducation programme for people with coronary heart disease: A randomized controlled trial

AIM

To examine the effect of a self-help psychoeducation program for people with coronary heart disease in Singapore.

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation has shown benefits for mitigating many cardiac risk factors and can lead to improvement in health-related quality of life and psychological well-being in people with heart disease. However, traditional hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation faces substantial challenges. A self-management cardiac rehabilitation program offers an avenue to increase uptake and empowers patients to manage their condition at home.

DESIGN

A two-arm, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

A total of 129 patients with coronary heart disease were recruited from an outpatient clinic in a public hospital in Singapore from April 2015-January 2016. They were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group. Participants in the intervention group received the 4-week home-based self-help psychoeducation program. Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 4 weeks and 16 weeks from the baseline.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in health-related quality of life, psychological status (i.e., perceived stress level, anxiety, and depression levels), or cardiac physiological risk parameters between the intervention and the control groups immediately after the program or at different time points. There was also no significant difference in unplanned health service use at the 16 week posttest point between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find any significant effect of our program on outpatients with coronary heart disease. Nonetheless, findings on participant characteristics may offer healthcare professionals valuable insights to help facilitate future development of an effective cardiac rehabilitation program catered to outpatients with coronary heart disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study has been registered with ISRCTN registry. The trial registration number is ISRCTN15839687.