Usefulness of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Recurrent Pericarditis

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of LV Remodeling Post-Myocardial Infarction: Prognosis, Monitoring and Trial Endpoints

Adverse left ventricular remodeling (ALVR) and subsequent heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI) remain a major cause of patient morbidity and mortality worldwide. Overt inflammation has been identified as the common pathway underlying myocardial fibrosis and development of ALVR post-MI. With its ability to simultaneously provide information about cardiac structure, function, perfusion, and tissue characteristics, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is well poised to inform prognosis and guide early surveillance and therapeutics in high-risk cohorts. Further, established and evolving CMR-derived biomarkers may serve as clinical endpoints in prospective trials evaluating the efficacy of novel anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic therapies. This review provides an overview of post-MI ALVR and illustrates how CMR may help clinical adoption of novel therapies via mechanistic or prognostic imaging markers.

INFLA-score: A new diagnostic paradigm to identify pericarditis

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of pericarditis may be challenging because not all patients meet the conventional criteria. An overlooked diagnosis implies a longer course of symptoms and an increased risk of recurrences. C-reactive protein (CRP), widely used as an inflammation marker, has some limitations. This study aimed to assess the usefulness and prognostic value of INFLA-score, a validated index assessing low-grade inflammation, in the definite diagnosis of pericarditis.

METHODS

Patients with suspected pericarditis were included. The INFLA-score was computed based on white blood cells and platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and CRP, ranging from -16 to +16. An INFLA-score > 0 was considered positive for the presence of pericardial inflammation. The primary end point was the association of INFLA-score with diagnosis of pericarditis according to conventional criteria. The recurrence of pericarditis at 6 months was the secondary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients were included, aged 47 ± 17 years, and 57% were females. Among 72 (36%) patients with a diagnosis of pericarditis, an INFLA-score > 0 was observed in 86% (vs. 36%, p < 0.001), abnormal CRP in 42% (vs. 10%, p < 0.001), pericardial effusion in 44% (vs. 19%, p < 0.001), abnormal electrocardiogram in 56% (vs. 24%, p < 0.001), and rubs in 5% (vs. 0.1%, p = 0.072). INFLA-score > 0 had the strongest predictive value for the diagnosis of pericarditis (hazard ratio 8.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.39-21.21), with 86% sensitivity and 64% specificity, as opposed to CRP (hazard ratio 1.72, non-significant 95% CI 0.69-4.29). Recurrent pericarditis at 6 months was more frequent in patients with a positive INFLA-score (37% vs. 8%, p < 0.001, rate ratio 4.15, 95% CI 2.81-6.12). In patients with normal CRP, INFLA-score-confirmed ongoing inflammation in 78% of the cases. Compared with the conventional criteria, the INFLA-score had the highest accuracy (area under the curve = 0.82). Different cutoffs were valuable to rule out (INFLA-score > 0, sensitivity 86%, and negative likelihood ratio 0.22) or rule in (INFLA-score ≥ 10, specificity 97%, and positive likelihood ratio 13) the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The INFLA-score is a useful diagnostic tool to assess the probability of pericarditis, with a strong prognostic value for further recurrences, outperforming CRP.

Constrictive Pericarditis: An Update on Noninvasive Multimodal Diagnosis

Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a rare condition that can affect the pericardium after every pericardial disease process and has been described even after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccine. In CP, the affected pericardium, usually the inner layer, is noncompliant, constraining the heart to a fixed maximum volume and impairing the diastolic function. This leads to several clinical features, that, however, can be pleomorphic. In its difficult diagnostic workup, noninvasive multimodal imaging plays a central role, providing important morphological and functional data, like the enhanced ventricular interdependence and the dissociation between intrathoracic and intracardiac pressures. An early and proper diagnosis is crucial to set an appropriate therapy, changing the prognosis of patients affected by CP. In this review, we cover in detail the main elements of each imaging technique, after a reminder of pathophysiology useful for understanding the diagnostic findings.

Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Women's Chest Pain: A Question of Gender

Awareness of gender differences in cardiovascular disease (CVD) has increased: both the different impact of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on women and the existence of sex-specific risk factors have been demonstrated. Therefore, it is essential to recognize typical aspects of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women, who usually show a lower prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as a cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). It is also important to know how to recognize pathologies that can cause acute chest pain with a higher incidence in women, such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) gained a pivotal role in the context of cardiac emergencies. Thus, the aim of our review is to investigate the most frequent scenarios in women with acute chest pain and how advanced cardiac imaging can help in the management and diagnosis of ACS.

New Developments in the Management of Recurrent Pericarditis

Recurrent pericarditis is a common and troublesome complication that affects 15%-30% of patients with a previous episode of pericarditis. However, the pathogenesis of these recurrences is not well understood, and most cases remain idiopathic. Recent advances in medical therapy, including the use of colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents like anakinra and rilonacept, have suggested an autoinflammatory rather than an autoimmune mechanism for recurrences with an inflammatory phenotype. As a result, a more personalized approach to treatment is now recommended. Patients with an inflammatory phenotype (fever and elevated C-reactive protein level) should receive colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents as first-line therapy, whereas those without systemic inflammation should receive low to moderate doses of corticosteroids (eg, prednisone 0.2-0.5 mg/kg/d as an initial dose) and consider azathioprine and intravenous human immunoglobulins in the case of corticosteroid failure. Tapering of corticosteroids should be slow after achieving clinical remission. In this article, we review the new developments in the management of recurrent pericarditis.

The Contemporary Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases

Pericardial syndromes encompass different clinical conditions from acute pericarditis to idiopathic chronic pericardial effusion. Transthoracic echocardiography is the first and most important initial diagnostic imaging modality in most patients affected by pericardial disease. However, cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) have recently gained a pivotal role in cardiology, and recent reports have supported the role of both of these advanced techniques in the evaluation and guiding therapy of pericardial disease. Most promising is the capability of CMR to identify the presence of pericardial inflammation, carrying both diagnostic and prognostic value in the setting of recurrent and chronic pericarditis. In addition, CCT permits accurate evaluation of the presence and extension of pericardial calcification, providing important information in confirming the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and during the preprocedural planning for patients undergoing pericardiectomy. Both CCT and CMR require specific expertise, especially for the evaluation of pericardial disease. The aim of the present review is to provide physicians an updated overview of CCT and CMR in pericardial disease, focusing on technical issues, recent research findings, and potential clinical applications.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of pericardial diseases: a comprehensive guide

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has been established as a valuable diagnostic tool in the assessment of pericardial diseases by providing information on cardiac anatomy and function, surrounding extra-cardiac structures, pericardial thickening and effusion, characterization of pericardial effusion, and the presence of active pericardial inflammation from the same scan. In addition, CMR imaging has excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive detection of constrictive physiology evading the need for invasive catheterization in most instances. Growing evidence in the field suggests that pericardial enhancement on CMR is not only diagnostic of pericarditis but also has prognostic value for pericarditis recurrence, although such evidence is derived from small patient cohorts. CMR findings could also be used to guide treatment de-escalation or up-titration in recurrent pericarditis and selecting patients most likely to benefit from novel treatments such as anakinra and rilonacept. This article is an overview of the CMR applications in pericardial syndromes as a primer for reporting physicians. We sought to provide a summary of the clinical protocols used and an interpretation of the major CMR findings in the setting of pericardial diseases. We also discuss points that are less well clear and delineate the strengths and weak points of CMR in pericardial diseases.

Advances in Imaging and Targeted Therapies for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Review

Importance

Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease. Recurrence of pericarditis affects 15% to 30% of patients after the initial episode of pericarditis. Up to 50% of patients with the first recurrence have additional recurrences. These patients often progress to have colchicine-resistant and corticosteroid-dependent disease. Rapidly evolving cardiac magnetic resonance imaging techniques and novel targeted therapies have paved the way for imaging-guided therapy for recurrent pericarditis. However, the optimal application of these recent advances remains unclear.

Observations

A search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for English-language studies, management guidelines, meta-analyses, and review articles published until April 2022 on recurrent pericarditis. Following the 2015 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases, new clinical trials and registry data have emerged that demonstrate the efficacy of interleukin-1 blockers in recurrent pericarditis. In addition, new observational data have come to light supporting the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of such patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

Advances in imaging and targeted therapies have led to a paradigm shift in the management of recurrent pericarditis. This narrative review summarizes the established and emerging data on the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent pericarditis with special emphasis on the role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and interleukin-1 blockers in the current era of tailored therapy for recurrent pericarditis.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques and Applications for Pericardial Diseases

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging plays a central role among multimodality imaging modalities in the assessment, diagnosis, and surveillance of pericardial diseases. Clinicians and imagers should have a foundational understanding of the utilities, advantages, and limitations of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and how they integrate with other diagnostic tools involved in the evaluation and management of pericardial diseases. This review aims to outline the contemporary magnetic resonance imaging sequences used to evaluate the pericardium, followed by exploring the main clinical applications of magnetic resonance imaging for identifying pericardial inflammation, constriction, and effusion.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of the electrocardiogram in patients with pericarditis

OBJECTIVE

The ECG has been traditionally used to support the diagnosis of pericarditis. However, the pericardium is electrically silent and ECG changes may imply concurrent myocardial involvement rather than simple pericarditis. The aim of the present paper is to analyse the frequency, type and clinical implication of ECG changes in patients with pericarditis compared with those with myocarditis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with pericarditis and/or myocarditis were included in a prospective cohort study from January 2017 to December 2020. A clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6 months and then every 6 months. Cardiac magnetic resonance was used to diagnose concurrent myocarditis.

RESULTS

166 patients (median age 47 years, 95% CI 44 to 51) with 66 men (39.8%) were included: 110 cases with pericarditis (mean age 47.7 years, 29.1% male) and 56 cases with myocarditis (mean age 44.8, 60.7% male). ECG changes were reported in 61 of 166 (36.7%) patients: 27 of 110 (24.5%) among those with pericarditis and 34 of 56 (60.7%) among those with myocarditis (p<0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ECG changes were associated with troponin elevation (risk ratio 1.97; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.43), suggesting myocardial involvement. ECG changes were not associated with increased risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

ECG changes, mainly widespread ST-segment elevation, can be recorded in about one-quarter of patients with pericarditis, and were not associated with a worse prognosis. These changes may reflect concurrent myocarditis that should be ruled out.

Assessment of the epi-pericardial fibrotic substrate by collagen-targeted probes

The identification of the fibrotic arrhythmogenic substrate as a means of improving the diagnosis and prediction of atrial fibrillation has been a focus of research for many years. The relationship between the degree of atrial fibrosis as a major component of atrial cardiomyopathy and the recurrence of arrhythmia after AF ablation can correlate. While the focus in identification and characterisation of this substrate has been centred on the atrial wall and the evaluation of atrial scar and extracellular matrix (ECM) expansion by late gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI), LGE cannot visualise diffuse fibrosis and diffuse extravasation of gadolinium. The atrial pericardium is a fine avascular fibrous membranous sac that encloses the atrial wall, which can undergo remodelling leading to atrial disease and AF. Nevertheless, little attention has been given to the detection of its fibrocalcification, impact on arrhythmogenesis and, most importantly, on the potential prothrombotic role of epi-pericardial remodelling in generation of emboli. We have recently reported that tracers against collagen I and IV can provide a direct assessment of the ECM, and thus can estimate fibrotic burden with high sensitivity. Here, we show the ability of these optical tracers to identify epi-pericardial fibrosis, as well as to demonstrate subtle interstitial fibrosis of the atrial wall in a mouse model of beta-2-adrenergic receptor (β₂-AR) cardiac overexpression.

Radiation-Induced Heart Disease

Cancer incidence and survivorship have had a rising tendency over the last two decades due to better treatment modalities. One of these is radiation therapy (RT), which is used in 20-55% of cancer patients, and its basic principle consists of inhibiting proliferation or inducing apoptosis of cancer cells. Classically, photon beam RT has been the mainstay therapy for these patients, but, in the last decade, proton beam has been introduced as a new option. This newer method focuses more on the tumor and affects less of the surrounding normal tissue, i.e., the heart. Radiation to the heart is a common complication of RT, especially in patients with lymphoma, breast, lung, and esophageal cancer. The pathophysiology is due to changes in the microvascular and macrovascular milieu that can promote accelerated atherosclerosis and/or induce fibrosis of the myocardium, pericardium, and valves. These complications occur days, weeks, or years after RT and the risk factors associated are high radiation doses (>30 Gy), concomitant chemotherapy (primarily anthracyclines), age, history of heart disease, and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. The understanding of these mechanisms and risk factors by physicians can lead to a tailored assessment and monitorization of these patients with the objective of early detection or prevention of radiation-induced heart disease. Echocardiography is a noninvasive method which provides a comprehensive evaluation of the pericardium, valves, myocardium, and coronaries, making it the first imaging tool in most cases; however, other modalities, such as computed tomography, nuclear medicine, or cardiac magnetic resonance, can provide additional value.

Established and Emerging Techniques for Pericardial Imaging with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pericardial diseases include a wide range of pathologies and their diagnosis can often be challenging. The goal of this review is to describe the established and emerging CMR imaging techniques used in the assessment of common pericardial diseases and explain the role of pericardial characterization in their diagnosis and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

CMR is indicated in cases of diagnostic uncertainty and for a comprehensive evaluation of the pericardium and its impact on the heart. This includes assessment of pericardial anatomy and associated cardiac hemodynamics, quantification and characterization of an effusion, disease staging, tissue characterization, guiding management, and even prognostication in some diseases of the pericardium. An emerging technique, pericardial characterization, utilizes various sequences to diagnose and stage pericardial inflammation, act as a biomarker in recurrent pericarditis, and guide management in inflammatory pericardial conditions. Beyond imaging, it has ushered in an era of tailored therapy for patients with pericardial diseases. Future directions should aim at exploring the role of tissue characterization in various pericardial diseases.

Anti-interleukin-1 agents for pericarditis: a primer for cardiologists

Anti-interleukin (IL)-1 agents have been developed for the treatment of autoinflammatory and rheumatic conditions, where overproduction of IL-1 is an important pathophysiologic process. IL-1α and IL-1β are the most studied members of the IL-1 family of cytokines and have the strongest proinflammatory effects. A naturally occurring antagonist (IL-1Ra) mitigates their proinflammatory effects. Overproduction of both IL-1α (released by inflamed/damaged pericardial cells) and IL-1β (released by inflammatory cells) is now a well-recognized therapeutic target in patients with recurrent idiopathic pericarditis. Currently, there are three available anti-IL-1 agents: anakinra (recombinant human IL-1Ra), rilonacept (a soluble decoy receptor ‘trap’, binding both IL-1α and IL-1β), and canakinumab (human monoclonal anti-IL-1β antibody). For patients with corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis with evidence of systemic inflammation, as evidenced by elevated C-reactive protein, the efficacy and safety of anakinra (2 mg/kg/day up to 100 mg/day subcutaneously usually for at least 6 months, then tapered) and rilonacept (320 mg subcutaneously for the first day followed by 160 mg subcutaneously weekly) have been clearly demonstrated in observational studies and randomized controlled clinical trials. Severe side effects are rare and discontinuation rates are very low (<4%). The most common reported side effect is injection site reactions (>50% of patients). In this article, we describe the historical and pathophysiological background and provide a comprehensive review of these agents, which appear to be the most significant advance in medical therapy of recurrent pericarditis in the last 5 years.

The Impact of Physical Activity on Pericarditis

Purpose of Review

To discuss the possible harmful effects and pathophysiology of exercise in cases of pericarditis, explore the role of multi-modality imaging to help guide exercise recommendations, and compare U.S. with European guideline recommendations on the safe resumption of physical activity following resolution of pericarditis.

Recent Findings

Despite multiple postulated mechanisms by which exercise may be harmful during active inflammation of the myocardium or pericardium, the exact pathophysiology remains largely unknown. The inclusion of multi-modality cardiac imaging may play a role in further elucidating the relationship of exercise with outcomes in pericarditis. More recently, the prevalence of COVID-19 cardiac involvement in athletes prior to returning to play appears lower than previously reported; however, current recommendations are consistent with those for other etiologies of pericarditis.

Summary

Further research is certainly needed to better understand the relationship between physical activity and pericarditis, the pathophysiology, and the prognostic role of multimodality imaging.

Inflamed Colon and Pericardium: A Rare Combination of Colitis and Recurrent Pericarditis

A 29-year-old woman with severe ulcerative colitis presented with complicated recurrent pericarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed improvement in pericardial inflammation with a prolonged course of anti-inflammatory therapy, but she developed several relapses on biologics. Rilonacept (newer interleukin-1 antagonist), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and pericardiectomy may be considered in such patients. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in 2954 COVID-19 Adult Survivors: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Background

Recent studies have utilized MRI to determine the extent to which COVID‐19 survivors may experience cardiac sequels after recovery.

Purpose

To systematically review the main cardiac MRI findings in COVID‐19 adult survivors.

Study type

Systematic review.

Subjects

A total of 2954 COVID‐19 adult survivors from 16 studies.

Field Strength/sequence

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), parametric mapping (T1‐native, T2, T1‐post (extracellular volume fraction [ECV]), T2‐weighted sequences (myocardium/pericardium), at 1.5 T and 3  T.

Assessment

A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Google scholar databases using Boolean operators and the relevant key terms covering COVID‐19, cardiac injury, CMR, and follow‐up. MRI data, including (if available) T1, T2, extra cellular volume, presence of myocardial or pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and left and right ventricular ejection fraction were extracted.

Statistical Tests

The main results of the included studies are summarized. No additional statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Of 1601 articles retrieved from the initial search, 12 cohorts and 10 case series met our eligibility criteria. The rate of raised T1 in COVID‐19 adult survivors varied across studies from 0% to 73%. Raised T2 was detected in none of patients in 4 out of 15 studies, and in the remaining studies, its rate ranged from 2% to 60%. In most studies, LGE (myocardial or pericardial) was observed in COVID‐19 survivors, the rate ranging from 4% to 100%. Myocardial LGE mainly had nonischemic patterns. None of the cohort studies observed myocardial LGE in “healthy” controls. Most studies found that patients who recovered from COVID‐19 had a significantly greater T1 and T2 compared to participants in the corresponding control group.

Data Conclusion

Findings of MRI studies suggest the presence of myocardial and pericardial involvement in a notable number of patients recovered from COVID‐19.

Level of Evidence

3

Technical Efficacy Stage

3

Recurrent pericarditis: an update on diagnosis and management

Recurrent pericarditis is a true challenge for clinicians, especially when the patient becomes unresponsive or not tolerant to conventional treatments. An accurate diagnosis of recurrent pericarditis, possibly supported by advanced imaging tools, is critical to provide timely and appropriate treatment of symptoms and prevention of further episodes. The incessant research on the inflammatory pathways underlying cardiovascular diseases, led recently to the assessment of anti interleukin-1 agents in the setting of recurrent pericarditis. This review will focus on the diagnostic assessment of recurrent pericarditis, along with the most modern therapeutic advances in this field. Bibliographic databases were searched (MEDLINE/PubMed, BioMed Central, the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Randomized Trials, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Google Scholar) using the terms "recurrent pericarditis" AND "diagnosis" OR "treatment" OR "IL-1" OR "inflammation".

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Heart Failure

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize the application of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with heart failure (HF).

Recent Findings

CMR is an important non-invasive imaging modality in the assessment of ventricular volumes and function and in the analysis of myocardial tissue characteristics. The information derived from CMR provides a comprehensive evaluation of HF. Its unique ability of tissue characterization not only helps to reveal the underlying etiologies of HF but also offers incremental prognostic information.

Summary

CMR is a useful non-invasive tool for the diagnosis and assessment of prognosis in patients suffering from heart failure.

High Prevalence of Pericardial Involvement in College Student Athletes Recovering From COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to explore the spectrum of cardiac abnormalities in student athletes who returned to university campus in July 2020 with uncomplicated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

BACKGROUND

There is limited information on cardiovascular involvement in young individuals with mild or asymptomatic COVID-19.

METHODS

Screening echocardiograms were performed in 54 consecutive student athletes (mean age 19 years; 85% male) who had positive results of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction nasal swab testing of the upper respiratory tract or immunoglobulin G antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2. Sequential cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 48 (89%) subjects.

RESULTS

A total of 16 (30%) athletes were asymptomatic, whereas 36 (66%) and 2 (4%) athletes reported mild and moderate COVID-19 related symptoms, respectively. For the 48 athletes completing both imaging studies, abnormal findings were identified in 27 (56.3%) individuals. This included 19 (39.5%) athletes with pericardial late enhancements with associated pericardial effusion. Of the individuals with pericardial enhancements, 6 (12.5%) had reduced global longitudinal strain and/or an increased native T1. One patient showed myocardial enhancement, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction or reduced global longitudinal strain with or without increased native T1 values was also identified in an additional 7 (14.6%) individuals. Native T2 findings were normal in all subjects, and no specific imaging features of myocardial inflammation were identified. Hierarchical clustering of left ventricular regional strain identified 3 unique myopericardial phenotypes that showed significant association with the cardiac magnetic resonance findings (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 1 in 3 previously healthy college athletes recovering from COVID-19 infection showed imaging features of a resolving pericardial inflammation. Although subtle changes in myocardial structure and function were identified, no athlete showed specific imaging features to suggest an ongoing myocarditis. Further studies are needed to understand the clinical implications and long-term evolution of these abnormalities in uncomplicated COVID-19.

Recurrent pericarditis: an update on diagnosis and management

Acute pericarditis is a disease of the pericardium characterized by inflammation. Around 16-38% of patients develop recurrent events after the first episode. Recurrent pericarditis (RP) seems to be caused by a pathologic immune response. An inadequate treatment in terms of drug choice, dose, duration of therapy or tapering, has been shown to increase the risk of recurrences. Symptoms, physical signs and electrocardiographic signs are usually less severe during a recurrent event as compared to the first episode, thus favoring imaging as a tool to confirm the diagnosis of RP. Cardiac magnetic resonance is becoming the technique of choice because of its ability to detect active pericardial inflammation. Inflammatory biomarkers can be used to assess the risk of recurrences and to guide the tapering of treatments. First-line treatment is based on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine. NSAIDs are useful for pain control, and colchicine has shown to reduce the risk of further recurrences. Glucocorticoids are often used as second-line drugs, but they are associated with a high rate of recurrent events. Interleukin-1 inhibitors, such as anakinra and rilonacept, significantly reduce the risk of recurrences in patients with RP while on treatment.

Multimodality imaging in pericardial diseases

With a rapidly growing spectrum, non-specific symptoms and overlapping etiologies, pericardial diseases can represent a real diagnostic challenge. Consequently, multimodality imaging has taken a front seat in the diagnosis and management of these conditions. Cardiac CT offers an excellent anatomical characterization of pericardial thickening, fat stranding and/or presence of calcifications. and is also the preferred modality to assess extra-cardiac structures. Active pericardial inflammation, edema and fibrosis comprise pericardial characterization using CMR and allows for a precise diagnosis, disease staging and patient specific tailoring of therapies. PET scan still occupies a very modest role in the evaluation of pericardial diseases, but might help discriminating malignant pericardial effusion and extra-pulmonary tuberculous. More than ever, clinicians need to master how these modalities complement each other while avoiding unnecessary cost and to translate this knowledge into a more customized patient's care approach. The aim of this review is to recognize the role of multimodality imaging in the investigation of various pericardial diseases, assess how these modalities can impact the clinical course and treatment of these affections and finally elucidate their role in the patient's prognostication.

SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance

The Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) last published its comprehensive expert panel report of clinical indications for CMR in 2004. This new Consensus Panel report brings those indications up to date for 2020 and includes the very substantial increase in scanning techniques, clinical applicability and adoption of CMR worldwide. We have used a nearly identical grading system for indications as in 2004 to ensure comparability with the previous report but have added the presence of randomized controlled trials as evidence for level 1 indications. In addition to the text, tables of the consensus indication levels are included for rapid assimilation and illustrative figures of some key techniques are provided.

Long-Term Outcome of Pericardial Drainage in Cases of Chronic, Large, Hemodynamically Insignificant, C-Reactive Protein Negative, Idiopathic Pericardial Effusions

Pericardial effusion (PE) prognosis depends on the underlying etiology. We sought to assess the outcome of patients with chronic (>3 months), large (diastolic echo-free space >2 cm), idiopathic (without apparent etiology), C-reactive protein (CRP) negative PE, a topic where data are lacking. A total of n = 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were treated by pericardiocentesis (n = 39) or surgical pericardial "window" (PW) (n = 13) or conservatively (n = 22). The median follow-up was 24 months (interquartile range: 15 to 38). Among those patients who had PE drained (n = 52), PE re-accumulation occurred in 32 cases (61.5%) and the rate was significantly higher in the pericardiocentesis subgroup (76.9% for pericardiocentesis vs 15.4% for PW group, p <0.001). Patients with re-accumulation had longer disease duration (32.1 ± 25.7 months vs 19.5 ± 23.8 months, p = 0.01), higher maximum PE diameter (32.2 ± 9.4 mm vs 26.1 ± 4.9 mm, p = 0.003) and larger PE volume drained at baseline (1,912 ± 707 mL vs 1,508 ± 387 mL, p = 0.04). Large PE re-accumulation occurred in 41% of patients who underwent pericardiocentesis and in 7.7% of those who underwent PW. In Cox survival analysis the only independent predictor of fluid re-accumulation was the type of intervention, with PW being associated with significantly reduced risk (hazard ratio 0.115, 95% confidence interval 0.015 to 0.875, p = 0.037). Major complications needing treatment were recorded in 12.8% and 15.4% (p = 0.999) of patients who underwent pericardiocentesis and PW, respectively. Moreover, invasive procedures were not helpful in establishing new diagnoses and guide treatment. In conclusion, in asymptomatic patients with chronic, large, hemodynamically insignificant, CRP negative, idiopathic PE, conservative management seems a more reasonable approach in most cases.