Temporal Trends in the Clinical Acuity of Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Characteristics, management and outcome of patients with late-arrival STEMI in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys (ACSIS)

Introduction

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and late arrival (>12 h) after symptom onset, are at high risk for mortality and heart failure and represent a challenge for management. We aimed to define patient characteristics, management, and outcome of late-arrival STEMI in Israel over the last 20 years.

Methods

We analyzed data of late-arrival STEMI (12-48 h and > 48 h) from the biennial acute coronary syndrome Israeli Surveys (ACSIS), as well as time-dependent changes [early (2000-2010) Vs. late (2013-2021) period].

Results

Data regarding time from symptom onset to hospital arrival was available in 6,466 STEMI patients. Of these, 9.6 % arrived 12-48 h and 3 % >48 h from symptom onset. Late-arrival patients were more likely to be older women with diabetes and high GRACE score and less likely to have prior myocardial infarction.In recent years, 95 % of patients arriving 12-48 h and 96 % of those arriving > 48 h had coronary angiography, as opposed to 75 % and 77 % in the early years (p = 0.007). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increased from 60 % and 55 % respectively to 85 % (p ≤ 0.001).TIMI-3 flow after primary PCI was 89-92 %, irrespective of arrival time. Late arrival patients (12-48 h but not > 48 h) who had PCI had better adjusted 1-year survival, HR 0.49 (95 %CI 0.29-0.82), p = 0.01.

Conclusions

Late-arrival STEMI patients have higher risk characteristics. Most late-arrival patients undergo coronary angiography and PCI and have TIMI-3 flow after primary PCI. In patients arriving 12-48 h after symptom onset PCI is associated with better survival.

Treatment and Care of Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction-What Challenges Remain after Three Decades of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) has revolutionized the prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and is the gold standard treatment. As a result of its success, the number of pPCI centres has expanded worldwide. Despite decades of advancements, clinical outcomes in STEMI patients have plateaued. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock remain a major cause of high in-hospital mortality, whilst the growing burden of heart failure in long-term STEMI survivors presents a growing problem. Many elements aiming to optimize STEMI treatment are still subject to debate or lack sufficient evidence. This review provides an overview of the most contentious current issues in pPCI in STEMI patients, with an emphasis on unresolved questions and persistent challenges.

Efficacy and safety of inhibiting the NLRP3/IL-1β/IL-6 pathway in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The NLRP3/IL-1β/IL-6 pathway plays a key role in mediating inflammatory responses after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the clinical benefits of inhibiting this pathway in STEMI are uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhibiting the NLRP3/IL-1β/IL-6 pathway in STEMI patients.

METHODS

This study followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of inhibiting the NLRP3/IL-1β/IL-6 pathway in STEMI patients within 7 days of symptom onset. The efficacy outcomes included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, new-onset or worsening heart failure (HF) and stroke. The safety outcomes were serious infection, gastrointestinal adverse events and injection site reactions.

RESULTS

Of 316 screened records, nine trials with 1211 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Colchicine reduced the risk of recurrent MI (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.74; I2  = 0.0%). Anakinra was associated with reduced risk of new-onset or worsening HF (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.77; I2  = 0.0%) and decreased C-reactive protein levels (SMD -1.34, 95% CI -2.04 to -0.65; I2  = 0.0%). Colchicine and anakinra increased the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events (RR 4.43, 95% CI 2.75-7.13; I2  = 38.1%) and injection site reactions (RR 4.52, 95% CI 1.32-15.49; I2  = 0.8%), respectively. None of the three medications affected the risks of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stroke and serious infection.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still no large-scale RCT evidence on the efficacy and safety of inhibiting the NLRP3/IL-1β/IL-6 pathway for the treatment of STEMI. Preliminary results from the available RCTs suggest colchicine and anakinra may respectively reduce the risks of recurrent MI and new-onset or worsening HF. The available RCTs in this meta-analysis lack power to determine any differences on mortality.

Impact of Diabetes on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Community Surveillance

Background Diabetes is associated with increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The demographic trends, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with diabetes who are hospitalized with AMI have not been recently reported. Methods and Results The ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study conducted hospital surveillance of AMI in 4 US communities. AMI was classified by physician review using a validated algorithm. Medications and procedures were abstracted from the medical record. From 2000 to 2014, 21 094 weighted hospitalizations for AMI were sampled. The prevalence of diabetes steadily increased, from 35% to 41% to 43% (P-trend<0.0001) across 2000 to 2004, 2005 to 2009, and 2010 to 2014, respectively. Patients with diabetes were older (61 versus 59 years of age), more often Black (44% versus 31%), and more commonly women (42% versus 34%). The burden of cardiovascular comorbidities was higher with diabetes and increased temporally. Patients with diabetes less often presented with ST-segment elevation (9% versus 17%) or acute chest pain (72% versus 80%), and had higher mean GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome) score (123 versus 109), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) score (4.3 versus 4.0), and Killip class (1.9 versus 1.5). Patients with diabetes had a lower adjusted probability of receiving aspirin (relative probability, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.91-0.99]), nonaspirin antiplatelets (0.93 [95% CI, 0.86-0.99]), coronary angiography (0.85 [95% CI, 0.78-0.92]), and coronary revascularization (0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.92]). Diabetes was associated with a 52% higher hazard of all-cause 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.23-1.89]). Conclusions Diabetes is associated with higher risk of death in patients hospitalized with AMI, highlighting the need for adherence to evidence-based therapies in this high-risk population.

Demographic and Regional Trends of Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus-Related Mortality in the United States From 1999 to 2019

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to study the contemporary trends in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM)-related mortality.

METHODS

We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging OnLine Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database to identify adults ≥25 years old where both CVD and DM were listed as an underlying or contributing cause of death between 1999 and 2019. Crude and age-adjusted mortality rates per 100,000 population were determined.

RESULTS

The overall age-adjusted mortality rate was 99.18 in 1999 and 91.43 in 2019, with a recent increase from 2014-2019 (annual percent change 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.6). Age-adjusted mortality rate was higher for males compared with females, with increasing mortality in males between 2014 and 2019 (annual percent change 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0). Age-adjusted mortality rate was highest for non-Hispanic Black adults and was ∼2-fold higher compared with non-Hispanic White adults. Young and middle-aged adults (25-69 years) had increasing age-adjusted mortality rates in recent years. There were significant urban-rural disparities, and age-adjusted mortality rates in rural counties increased from 2014 to 2019 (annual percent change 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-2.9); states in the 90^th percentile of mortality had age-adjusted mortality rates that were ∼2-fold higher than those in the bottom 10^th percentile of mortality.

CONCLUSION

After an initial decrease in DM + CVD-related mortality for a decade, this trend has reversed, with increasing mortality from 2014 to 2019. Significant geographic and demographic disparities persist, requiring targeted health policy interventions to prevent the loss of years of progress.

The Predictive Value of Different Nutritional Indices Combined with the GRACE Score in Predicting the Risk of Long-Term Death in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Nutritional status is associated with prognosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Although the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is regarded as a relevant risk predictor for the prognosis of ACS patients, nutritional variables are not included in the GRACE score. This study aimed to compare the prognostic ability of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in predicting long-term all-cause death in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to determine whether the GNRI or PNI could improve the predictive value of the GRACE score. A total of 799 patients with ACS who underwent PCI from May 2018 to December 2019 were included and regularly followed up. The performance of the PNI in predicting all-cause death was better than that of the GNRI [C-index, 0.677 vs. 0.638, p = 0.038]. The addition of the PNI significantly improved the predictive value of the GRACE score for all-cause death [increase in C-index from 0.722 to 0.740; IDI 0.006; NRI 0.095; p < 0.05]. The PNI was superior to the GNRI in predicting long-term all-cause death in ACS patients undergoing PCI. The addition of the PNI to the GRACE score could significantly improve the prediction of long-term all-cause death.

Clinical Validation of the Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, Delta Shock Index, and Shock Index-C for Emergency Department ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a leading cause of death worldwide. A shock index (SI), modified SI (MSI), delta-SI, and shock index-C (SIC) are known predictors of STEMI. This retrospective cohort study was designed to compare the predictive value of the SI, MSI, delta-SI, and SIC with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk scales. Method: Patients > 20 years old with STEMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with the Youden index was performed to calculate the optimal cutoff values for these predictors. Results: Overall, 1552 adult STEMI cases were analyzed. The thresholds for the emergency department (ED) SI, MSI, SIC, and TIMI risk scales for in-hospital mortality were 0.75, 0.97, 21.00, and 5.5, respectively. Accordingly, ED SIC had better predictive power than the ED SI and ED MSI. The predictive power was relatively higher than TIMI risk scales, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance. After adjusting for confounding factors, the ED SI > 0.75, MSI > 0.97, SIC > 21.0, and TIMI risk scales > 5.5 were statistically and significantly associated with in-hospital mortality of STEMI. Compared with the ED SI and MSI, SIC (>21.0) had better sensitivity (67.2%, 95% CI, 58.6−75.9%), specificity (83.5%, 95% CI, 81.6−85.4%), PPV (24.8%, 95% CI, 20.2−29.6%), and NPV (96.9%, 95% CI, 96.0−97.9%) for in-hospital mortality of STEMI. Conclusions: SIC had better discrimination ability than the SI, MSI, and delta-SI. Compared with the TIMI risk scales, the ACU value of SIC was still higher. Therefore, SIC might be a convenient and rapid tool for predicting the outcome of STEMI.

A randomized multicenter trial to evaluate early invasive strategy for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting 24-48 hours from symptom onset: Protocol of the RESCUE-MI study

BACKGROUND

For ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting 24 to 48 hours from symptom onset, whether early invasive strategy should be performed still remains controversial.

METHODS

This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, investigator initiated, randomized controlled trial (NCT04962178) to evaluate the efficacy of early invasive strategy for STEMI patients within 24 to 48 hours of symptom onset. A total of 366 patients will be included from 10 hospitals in mainland China. They will be randomly (1:1) divided into 2 groups: the early invasive strategy group (primary percutaneous coronary intervention, PPCI) and conservative strategy group (optimal medical therapy with primary PCI not performed). All patients will be followed for 1 month. The primary end point is myocardial infarction size on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The secondary end points are as follows: (1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which is defined as a composite of cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemic driven target vessel revascularization and stroke; (2) other CMR end points, including microvascular obstruction, intramyocardial hemorrhage, myocardial area at risk, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end diastolic volume and left ventricular end systolic volume.

DISCUSSION

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of early invasive strategy for STEMI patients within 24 to 48 hours of symptom onset and will add more evidence for clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04962178. Registered on July 14, 2021.

Using the Zwolle Risk Score at Time of Coronary Angiography to Triage Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Thrombolysis

Background The Zwolle Risk Score was designed to identify the risk of complications in patients with ST-segment‒elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Its utility following PCI in STEMI treated with thrombolysis is unknown. The objective was to evaluate the safety of using the Zwolle Risk Score to triage patients with STEMI following PCI, including patients receiving thrombolysis. Methods and Results Patients aged ≥18 years with STEMI and primary PCI or PCI after thrombolysis were included. A triage protocol was developed, with high-risk patients those with Zwolle Risk Score ≥4 triaged to the cardiac intensive care unit. A prospective evaluation of the triaging protocol was performed on 452 patients, mean age 65±12 years, 73% men. Median Zwolle Risk Score was 3 (interquartile range, 2‒5), with 257 low-risk (57%), and 195 high-risk (43%) patients. Adherence to the protocol was 91%. In-hospital mortality was 0.4% in low-risk and 13% in high-risk patients (P<0.001). Seventy-two patients (16%) received thrombolysis. Median time post-thrombolysis to PCI was 281 minutes (interquartile range, 219‒376). In-hospital mortality was 0% versus 9% (P=0.083) for low- and high-risk patients, respectively. High-risk patients had higher rates of cardiogenic shock (34% versus 1%, P<0.001), pulmonary edema (60% versus 9%, P<0.001), arrhythmia (25% versus 2%, P<0.001), blood transfusion (10% versus 2%, P<0.001), and stroke (4% versus 0.4%, P=0.011). Median hospital costs decreased by $1419 per low-risk patient after protocol implementation. Conclusions For patients with STEMI following primary PCI or PCI following thrombolysis, a Zwolle-based triaging system is safe and may decrease cardiac intensive care unit usage costs.

Safety and Feasibility of Same Day Discharge Strategy for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background:

The strategy for early discharge after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could have substantial financial benefits, especially in low-middle income countries. However, there is a lack of local evidence on feasibility and safety of the strategy for early discharge. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the safety of early discharge after primary PCI in selected low-risk patients in the population of Karachi, Pakistan.

Methods:

In this study 600 consecutive low-risk patients who were discharged within 48 hours of primary PCI were put under observation for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after 7 and 30 days of discharge respectively. Patients were further stratified into discharge groups of very early (≤ 24 hours) and early (24 to 48 hours).

Results:

The sample consisted of 81.8% (491) male patients with mean age of 54.89 ± 11.08 years. Killip class was I in 90% (540) of the patients. The majority of patients (84%) were discharged within 24 hours of the procedure. Loss to follow-up after rate at 7 and 30 days was 4% (24) and 4.3% (26) respectively. Cumulative MACE rate after 7 and 30 days was observed in 3.5% and 4.9%, all-cause mortality in 1.4% and 2.3%, cerebrovascular events in 0.9% and 1.4%, unplanned revascularization in 0.9% and 1.2%, re-infarction in 0.3% and 0.5%, unplanned re-hospitalization in 0.5% and 0.5%, and bleeding events in 0.5% and 0.5% of the patients respectively.

Conclusion:

It was observed that very early (≤ 24 hours) discharge after primary PCI for low-risk patients is a safe strategy subjected to careful pre-discharge risk assessment with minimal rate of MACE after 7-days as well as 30-days.

Shock Index-C: An Updated and Simple Risk-Stratifying Tool in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: Shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure, SI) is a simple scale with prognostic value in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The present study introduces an updated version of SI that includes renal function.

Methods: A total of 1,851 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing PCI were retrospectively included at Cardiac Care Unit in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and divided into two groups according to their admission time: derivation database (from January 2010 to December 2013, n = 1,145) and validation database (from January 2014 to April 2016, n = 706). Shock Index-C (SIC) was calculated as (SI × 100)–estimated CCr. Calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. The predictive power of SIC was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: The predictive value and calibration of SIC for in-hospital death was excellent in derivation [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.877, p < 0.001; Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 3.95, p = 0.861] and validation cohort (AUC = 0.868, p < 0.001; Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 5.01, p = 0.756). SIC exhibited better predictive power for in-hospital events than SI (AUC: 0.874 vs. 0.759 for death; 0.837 vs. 0.651 for major adverse clinical events [MACEs]; 0.707 vs. 0.577 for contrast-induced acute kidney injury [CI-AKI]; and 0.732 vs. 0.590 for bleeding, all p < 0.001). Cumulative 1-year mortality was significantly higher in the upper SIC tertile (log-rank = 131.89, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: SIC was an effective predictor of poor prognosis and may have potential as a novel and simple risk stratification tool for patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.

Trends in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

AIMS

Despite recent progress in coronary artery disease treatment, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a very high-risk medical condition. Whether recent patients' outcomes, following implementation of the 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) STEMI guidelines have improved, is yet unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study was based on a prospective detailed registry of 2004 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). We compared trends during two different time periods (2006-2012 vs. 2012-2018). Endpoints included mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, repeat myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and coronary artery bypass surgery) at 1 month, 1 and 2 years. Rates of transradial interventions have risen significantly (67.3 vs. 42.0%; P < 0.01), as have rates of prasugrel administration (69.8 vs. 4.5%; P < 0.01) and use of drug eluting stents (75.5 vs. 56.5%; P < 0.01). Both at 1 and at 2 years, MACE was significantly lower in the later period (11.6 vs. 20.9%; P < 0.01 and 18.9 vs. 25.4%; P < 0.01 respectively), whereas mortality was only significantly lower after 1 year (5.8 vs. 8.6%; P = 0.02). Cox regression identified the later period (2012-2018) to independently and favorably impact MACE (hazard ratio, -0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; P < 0.01) but not mortality (hazard ratio, -0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.05; P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Among patients treated with pPCI for STEMI, adoption of the contemporary evidence-based treatments is associated with better MACE derived outcomes, following the inception of the 2012 ESC guidelines. Nonetheless, the long-term mortality was marginally (but not significantly) lower, which indicates an unmet need for further improvement.

Temporal trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome according to body mass index

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major public health concern. We sought to investigate temporal trends in characteristics and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients according to body mass index.

METHODS

The study population consisted of patients who were included in the Acute Coronary Syndromes Israeli Surveys during 2000-2016. Patients were categorised into three groups according to body mass index: below 25 kg/m2, 25-30 kg/m2 (overweight) and above 30 kg/m2 (obese). Among each body mass index group the outcomes of two time frames were compared - early (2000-2006) versus late (2008-2016).

RESULTS

Overall 12,167 patients were included. Between the years 2000 and 2016, the percentage of obese patients increased from 20% to 30%. Obese patients were more frequently selected for an invasive approach, and had the lowest all-cause mortality rates. A significant reduction in 1-year mortality in recent compared to early surveys among patients with body mass index less than 25 kg/m2 and in obese patients but not for overweight patients was shown. Multivariable analysis showed that body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2 was associated with 30% lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.90, P=0.005).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of obesity among acute coronary syndrome patients has increased over the past two decades. A reduction of all-cause mortality was mainly seen in lean and obese patients.

Trends, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalizations With In-Hospital-Onset Versus Out-of-Hospital Onset: The ARIC Study

Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with in-hospital onset (AMI-IHO) has poor prognosis but is clinically underappreciated. Whether its occurrence has changed over time is uncertain. Methods and Results Since 1987, the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study has conducted adjudicated surveillance of AMI hospitalizations in 4 US communities. Our analysis was limited to patients aged 35 to 74 years with symptomatic AMI. Patients with symptoms initiating after hospital arrival were considered AMI-IHO. A total of 26 678 weighted hospitalizations (14 276 unweighted hospitalizations) for symptomatic AMI were identified from 1995 to 2014, with 1137 (4%) classified as in-hospital onset. The population incidence rate of AMI-IHO increased in the 4 ARIC communities from 1995 through 2004 to 2005 through 2014 (12.7-16.9 events per 100 000 people; P for 20-year trend <0.0001), as did the proportion of AMI hospitalizations with in-hospital onset (3.7%-6.1%; P for 20-year trend =0.03). The 10-year proportions were stable for patients aged 35 to 64 years (3.0%-3.4%; P for 20-year trend =0.3) but increased for patients aged ≥65 years (4.6%-7.8%; P for 20-year trend =0.008; P for interaction by age group =0.04). AMI-IHO had a more severe clinical course with lower use of AMI therapies or invasive strategies and higher in-hospital (7% versus 3%), 28-day (19% versus 5%), and 1-year (29% versus 12%) mortality (P<0.0001 for all). Conclusions In this population-based community surveillance, AMI-IHO increased from 2005 to 2014, particularly among older patients. Quality initiatives to improve recognition and management of AMI-IHO should be especially focused on hospitalized patients aged >65.

Temporal trends in in-hospital complications of acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus registry

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-related morbidity and mortality remain substantial. Data on temporal trends in in-hospital complications of ACS patients are scarce. This study sought to investigate whether the incidence of in-hospital complications of ACS patients changed over time.

METHODS

Acute coronary syndrome patients prospectively enrolled in the National Registry of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS Plus) between 2003 and 2018 and with available data on in-hospital complications were included in the analysis. Rates of in-hospital complications, including recurrent angina, recurrent myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, cardiogenic shock, bleeding, acute renal failure, sepsis/systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)/multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS), AV block needing pacing and new-onset atrial fibrillation, were assessed for each 2-year period.

RESULTS

Among 47,845 ACS patients, in-hospital complications significantly decreased from 22.0% in 2003/2004 to 18.9% in 2017/2018 (p for trend <0.001). An initial decline in rates of in-hospital complications to 15.7% in 2009/2010 (p for trend <0.001) was followed by a constant increase thereafter (p for trend = 0.002). While rates of recurrent angina, recurrent myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock decreased over time, rates of bleeding events, acute renal failure, sepsis/SIRS/MODS, and new-onset atrial fibrillation increased. Rates of in-hospital complications were higher in women, mainly due to a constantly increased risk of bleeding and AV block needing pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in ischemic complications was paralleled by a concomitant increase in non-ischemic events. These findings emphasize that advanced strategies targeting non-ischemic complications are warranted to further improve quality of care of ACS patients.

The Midwest ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Consortium: Design and Rationale

BACKGROUND

Over the past 20 years, the development of regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care systems has led to remarkable progress in achieving timely coronary reperfusion with attendant improvement in clinical outcomes, including survival. Despite this progress, contemporary STEMI care does not consistently meet the national guideline-recommended goals, which offers an opportunity for further improvement in STEMI outcomes. The lack of single, comprehensive, national STEMI registry complicates our ability to improve STEMI outcomes in particular for high-risk STEMI subsets such as cardiac arrest (CA) and/or cardiogenic shock (CS).

OBJECTIVES

To address this need, the Midwest STEMI Consortium (MSC) was created as a collaboration of 4 large, regional STEMI care systems to provide a comprehensive, multicenter, and prospective STEMI registry without any exclusionary criteria.

METHODS

The MSC is a collaboration of 4 large, regional STEMI care systems: Iowa Heart Center in Des Moines, IA; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation in Minneapolis, MN; Prairie Heart Institute in Springfield, IL; and The Christ Hospital in Cincinnati, OH. Each has similar standardized STEMI protocol and together include 6 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospitals and over 100 non-PCI-capable hospitals. Each center had a prospective database that was transferred to a data coordinating center to create the multicenter database. The comprehensive database includes traditional risk factors, cardiovascular history, medications, time to treatment data, detailed angiographic characteristics, and short- and long-term clinical outcomes up to 5-year for myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Ten-year mortality rates were assessed by using national death index.

RESULTS

Currently, the comprehensive database (03/2003-01/2020) includes 14,911 consecutive STEMI patients with mean age of 62.3 ± 13.6 years, female gender (29%), and left anterior descending artery as the culprit vessel (34%). High risk features included: Age >75 years (19%), left ventricular ejection fraction <35% (15%), CA (10%), and CS (8%).

CONCLUSION

This collaboration of 4 large, regional STEMI care systems with broad entry criteria including high-risk STEMI subsets such as CA and/or CS provides a unique platform to conduct clinical research studies to optimize STEMI care.

The modern cardiovascular care unit: the cardiologist managing multiorgan dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite many advances in the management of critically ill patients, cardiogenic shock remains a challenge because it is associated with high mortality. Even if there is no universally accepted definition of cardiogenic shock, end-perfusion organ dysfunction is an obligatory and major criterion of its definition.Organ dysfunction is an indicator that cardiogenic shock is already at an advanced stage and is undergoing a rapid self-aggravating evolution. The aim of the review is to highlight the importance to diagnose and to manage the organ dysfunction occurring in the cardiogenic shock patients by providing the best literature published this year.

RECENT FINDINGS

The first step is to diagnose the organ dysfunction and to assess their severity. Echo has an important and increasing place regarding the assessment of end-organ impairment whereas no new biomarker popped up.

SUMMARY

In this review, we aimed to highlight for intensivists and cardiologists managing cardiogenic shock, the recent advances in the care of end-organ dysfunctions associated with cardiogenic shock. The management of organ dysfunction is based on the improvement of the cardiac function by etiologic therapy, inotropes and assist devices but will often necessitate organ supports in hospitals with the right level of equipment and multidisciplinary expertise.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most acute manifestation of coronary artery disease and is associated with great morbidity and mortality. A complete thrombotic occlusion developing from an atherosclerotic plaque in an epicardial coronary vessel is the cause of STEMI in the majority of cases. Early diagnosis and immediate reperfusion are the most effective ways to limit myocardial ischaemia and infarct size and thereby reduce the risk of post-STEMI complications and heart failure. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with STEMI; if PCI cannot be performed within 120 minutes of STEMI diagnosis, fibrinolysis therapy should be administered to dissolve the occluding thrombus. The initiation of networks to provide around-the-clock cardiac catheterization availability and the generation of standard operating procedures within hospital systems have helped to reduce the time to reperfusion therapy. Together with new advances in antithrombotic therapy and preventive measures, these developments have resulted in a decrease in mortality from STEMI. However, a substantial amount of patients still experience recurrent cardiovascular events after STEMI. New insights have been gained regarding the pathophysiology of STEMI and feed into the development of new treatment strategies.

Outcome of staged percutaneous coronary intervention within two weeks from admission in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease

BACKGROUND

The optimum timing of revascularization strategy for stenoses in nonculprit vessels in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) remains unclear. At present, there is no evidence investigating the outcome of staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within two weeks from admission among STEMI patients with MVD.

METHODS

A total of 210 STEMI patients with MVD who underwent primary PCI were analyzed. We compared the all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, and stroke) with median follow-up of 1200 days among the patients who underwent staged PCI within two weeks from admission (staged PCI ≤2 W) (n = 75), staged PCI after two weeks from admission (staged PCI >2 W) (n = 37) and culprit-only PCI (n = 98) in patients with STEMI and MVD.

RESULTS

The staged PCI ≤2 W showed lower all-cause mortality than culprit-only PCI (4.0 vs 29.6%, log-rank P = 0.001), and lower incidence of MACE than the staged PCI >2 W group (1.3 vs 18.9%, log-rank P = 0.001) and culprit-only PCI group (1.3 vs 22.5%, log-rank P = 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the staged PCI ≤2 W was a predictor of lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.176; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.049-0.630; P = 0.008) and lower incidence of MACE (HR, 0.068; 95% CI, 0.009-0.533; P = 0.011), but staged PCI >2 W was not.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, staged PCI within two weeks after admission showed more favorable outcomes compared with staged PCI after two weeks from admission or culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients with MVD.

Accuracy of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Risk Score in Contemporary Treatment of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score has been routinely used for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed to investigate whether the GRACE score has remained relevant with contemporary treatment of patients with ACS.

METHODS

Included were patients with ACS in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS). Patients were divided into high (> 140) and low-intermediate (≤ 140) GRACE score. Outcomes were compared for each GRACE score group among patients enrolled in early (2000 to 2006), mid (2008 to 2010) and late (2013 to 2016) surveys.

RESULTS

Included were 4931 patients. For patients with GRACE scores > 140, temporal improvements in therapy were associated with reduced 7-day all-cause mortality (5.7%, 4.1%, and 2.0% for patients in early, mid-, and late surveys, respectively, P = 0.01) and 1-year mortality rates (27.8%, 25.3%, and 21.8% for patients in early, mid-, and late surveys, respectively, P = 0.07). Among patients with GRACE scores ≤ 140, all-cause mortality rates at 1 year were lower among participants enrolled in recent surveys (5.3%, 3.5%, and 3.1% for patients in early, mid-, and late surveys, respectively, P = 0.01). No significant differences in the accuracy of the GRACE score in predicting 7-day mortality were observed, (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83, 0.87, and 0.75 for early, mid-, and late surveys, respectively, P = NS). Similarly, for 1-year all-cause mortality, the accuracy of the GRACE score remained comparable (AUC = 0.79, 0.84, and 0.82 for early, mid-, and late surveys, respectively, P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validated the accuracy of the GRACE score for risk stratification in ACS. The discrimination of the score has not been influenced by the better outcome with latest treatment.

Cardiogenic Shock: Recent Developments and Significant Knowledge Gaps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) continue to have high rates of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe current principles in the management of CS including coronary revascularization, medical management, mechanical circulatory support, and supportive care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Revascularization is still recommended, but trials have not found a benefit in the revascularization of nonculprit artery lesions. New mechanical circulatory support options are available, but optimal use remains uncertain. Overall improvement in outcomes appears to have plateaued. There remain substantial knowledge gaps about the management of CS. The ideal timing and selection criteria for mechanical support remain under-developed. There has been little systematic study to inform medical management or supportive care of this patient population. A more expansive research focus is necessary to improve the care of CS.