Coaching Patients Saves Lives and Money

Impact on all-cause mortality of a case prediction and prevention intervention designed to reduce secondary care utilisation: findings from a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Health coaching services could help to reduce emergency healthcare utilisation for patients targeted proactively by a clinical prediction model (CPM) predicting patient likelihood of future hospitalisations. Such interventions are designed to empower patients to confidently manage their own health and effectively utilise wider resources. Using CPMs to identify patients, rather than prespecified criteria, accommodates for the dynamic hospital user population and for sufficient time to provide preventative support. However, it is unclear how this care model would negatively impact survival.

METHODS

Emergency Department (ED) attenders and hospital inpatients between 2015 and 2019 were automatically screened for their risk of hospitalisation within 6 months of discharge using a locally trained CPM on routine data. Those considered at risk and screened as suitable for the intervention were contacted for consent and randomised to one-to-one telephone health coaching for 4-6 months, led by registered health professionals, or routine care with no contact after randomisation. The intervention involved motivational guidance, support for self-care, health education, and coordination of social and medical services. Co-primary outcomes were emergency hospitalisation and ED attendances, which will be reported separately. Mortality at 24 months was a safety endpoint.

RESULTS

Analysis among 1688 consented participants (35% invitation rate from the CPM, median age 75 years, 52% female, 1139 intervention, 549 control) suggested no significant difference in overall mortality between treatment groups (HR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.62, 1.08), pr(HR<1=0.92), but did suggest a significantly lower mortality in men aged >75 years (HR (95% CI): 0.57 (0.37, 0.84), number needed to treat=8). Excluding one site unable to adopt a CPM indicated stronger impact for this patient subgroup (HR (95% CI): 0.45 (0.26, 0.76)).

CONCLUSIONS

Early mortality in men aged >75 years may be reduced by supporting individuals at risk of unplanned hospitalisation with a clear outreach, out-of-hospital nurse-led, telephone-based coaching care model.

Food Is Medicine: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association

Unhealthy diets are a major impediment to achieving a healthier population in the United States. Although there is a relatively clear sense of what constitutes a healthy diet, most of the US population does not eat healthy food at rates consistent with the recommended clinical guidelines. An abundance of barriers, including food and nutrition insecurity, how food is marketed and advertised, access to and affordability of healthy foods, and behavioral challenges such as a focus on immediate versus delayed gratification, stand in the way of healthier dietary patterns for many Americans. Food Is Medicine may be defined as the provision of healthy food resources to prevent, manage, or treat specific clinical conditions in coordination with the health care sector. Although the field has promise, relatively few studies have been conducted with designs that provide strong evidence of associations between Food Is Medicine interventions and health outcomes or health costs. Much work needs to be done to create a stronger body of evidence that convincingly demonstrates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different types of Food Is Medicine interventions. An estimated 90% of the $4.3 trillion annual cost of health care in the United States is spent on medical care for chronic disease. For many of these diseases, diet is a major risk factor, so even modest improvements in diet could have a significant impact. This presidential advisory offers an overview of the state of the field of Food Is Medicine and a road map for a new research initiative that strategically approaches the outstanding questions in the field while prioritizing a human-centered design approach to achieve high rates of patient engagement and sustained behavior change. This will ideally happen in the context of broader efforts to use a health equity-centered approach to enhance the ways in which our food system and related policies support improvements in health.

MG53 does not mark cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality in subjects with type 2 diabetes: A prospective, observational study

AIMS

Subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are characterized by a high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. MG53, a marker of peripheral insulin resistance, has been linked with impaired β-cell function and decreased β-cell survival, and its circulating levels are increased in T2D. Its relationship with the cardiovascular risk profile and mortality in T2D is currently unknown.

METHODS

In this longitudinal study, MG53 was measured in serum samples collected at baseline for 296 Caucasian participants in the MIND.IT study, relating its circulating levels with the cardiovascular risk profile and all-cause mortality over a 17-years follow up.

RESULTS

As compared to a reference cohort of 234 healthy subjects, MG53 levels were higher in T2D individuals (p < 0.001), and higher in T2D women than in men (p = 0.001). In the whole study cohort, MG53 levels were directly related to HbA1c (r2 0.029; p = 0.006) and systolic blood pressure (r2 0.032; p = 0.004). There was no difference in baseline MG53 levels between deceased and alive participants, neither predict all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

MG53 does not mark the cardiovascular risk profile neither predict long-term mortality in Caucasian T2D individuals.

Exploring health coaching and mindfulness as levers for transformation in health: stakeholder perspectives

BACKGROUND

Health coaching (HC) and mindfulness (MFN) are proven interventions for mobilizing patients' inner resources and are slowly being integrated into public primary care. Since 2015 the medical community in Gibsons BC has integrated physician-led HC and MFN-based programs into team-based care. This exploratory study aimed to understand the mechanisms by which these rural programs helped both patients and clinicians, and to elicit priorities for future study in these fields.

METHODS

Using a qualitative participant-engaged constructivist approach in focus groups and large-group graphic facilitation, we elicited perspectives from patients and their physicians during a 1-day event held in September 2018. Thematic analysis of transcripts using Nvivo identified emergent themes that were regularly reviewed with coresearchers, and member checked with participants via online videoconferences held at 6 weeks and 4 months postevent.

RESULTS

We identified six main themes relating to the successful implementation of these programs: (i) accessibility and affordability, (ii) offering a toolbox of practical skills, (iii) providing attuned and openhearted care, (iv) generating hope and self-efficacy, (v) experiencing a shared humanity and connection, and (vi) addressing the health of the whole person.

CONCLUSION

These themes highlight critical qualities of HC and MFN programs when implemented in a Medicare system. Key features include reducing stigma around mental health through making programs physician-led and a natural part of primary care, enriching accessibility through public funding, and enhancing patient agency through cultivating embodied awareness, self-compassion, and interpersonal skills. These themes inform the next steps to support upscaling these programs to other communities.

A Digital Coaching Intervention for Cancer Survivors With Job Loss: Retrospective Study

Background

Returning to work is a key unmet need for working-age cancer survivors.

Objective

This study sought to evaluate return-to-work outcomes of a multidisciplinary intervention provided as routine employee support.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort analysis, patients with cancer and more than 3 months of absence from work were provided with an intervention consisting of digital resources and calls with a health coach. Propensity score matching was used to define a similar cohort of cancer patients absent from work, who were not offered the coaching intervention. The return-to-work rate as a percentage of all participants and secondary outcomes, such as the rate of death, were measured. The median time to return to work was compared between the cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A total of 220 participants were enrolled in the intervention, of which 125 met the criteria for analysis. The median follow-up from cancer diagnosis was 79 weeks (IQR 60-106 weeks). In the matched control group, 22 (17.6%) participants returned to work compared with 38 (30.4%) in the intervention group (P=.02). Additionally, 19 (15.2%) matched controls died prior to claim closure compared with 13 (10.4%) in the intervention group (P=.26). The Kaplan-Meier estimated median time for the first 15% of the cohort to return to work was 87.1 weeks (95% CI 60.0-109.1 weeks) for the matched control group compared with 70.6 weeks (95% CI 52.6-79.6 weeks; P=.08) for the intervention group.

Conclusions

Patients receiving a remotely delivered coaching program in a real-world setting returned to work at a higher frequency than did control participants receiving usual care.

Eight-year post-trial follow-up of morbidity and mortality of telephone health coaching

Background

Health coaching is a patient-centred approach to supporting self-management for the chronic conditions. However, long-term evidence of effectiveness of health coaching remains scarce. The object of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of telephone health coaching (THC) on mortality and morbidity among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), coronary artery disease (CAD) and congestive heart failure (CHF)..

Methods

1535 T2D, CAD and CHF patients with unmet treatment targets were randomly allocated into an intervention group (n = 1034) and control group (n = 501). Intervention group received monthly individual strength-based, autonomy supportive THC sessions (average 30 min) for behavior change with a specially trained nurse for 12 months additional to usual health care. Control group received usual health care services. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or non-fatal stroke or non-fatal myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina pectoris (UAP) during a follow-up of 8 years Three other composite endpoints with distinct combinations of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events and death from any cause were used as secondary outcomes. Other outcomes followed were the most relevant components of the composite endpoints. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data was linked to Finnish national health and social care registries and electronic health records (EHR). Post-trial eight-year evaluation was conducted using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis.

Results

The composite primary outcome event rate per 100 person years was lower in the intervention group (3.45) than in control group (3.88) in ITT -analysis, but the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio in the intervention group 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07; P = 0.19). In the subgroup (T2D, CAD/CHF) analysis, there were no statistically significant effects. The secondary PP-analysis showed statistically significant benefits for those who participated in the study.

Conclusions

No statistically significant effect of health coaching on mortality and morbidity was found in intention to treat analysis. The per protocol results suggest, however, that the intervention may be effective among patients who are willing and able to participate in health coaching. More research is needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from low-intensity health coaching.

Trial registration

NCT00552903 (registration date: the 1st of November 2007, updated the 3rd of February 2009).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07263-w.

SMARTphone-based, early cardiac REHABilitation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There are well-documented treatment gaps in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease with a lack of clearly defined strategies to assist early physical activity after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Smartphone technology may provide an innovative platform to close these gaps.

OBJECTIVES

The primary goal of this study was to assess whether a smartphone-based, early cardiac rehabilitation program improved exercise capacity in patients with ACS.

METHODS

A total of 206 patients with ACS across six tertiary Australian hospitals were included in this randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to usual care (UC; including referral to traditional cardiac rehabilitation), with or without an adjunctive smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation program (S-CRP) upon hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was change in exercise capacity, measured by the change in 6-minute walk test distance at 8 weeks when compared to baseline, between groups. Secondary endpoints included uptake and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation, changes in cardiac risk factors, psychological well-being and quality of life status.

RESULTS

Of the 168 patients with complete follow-up (age 56 ± 10 years; 16% females), 83 were in the S-CRP. At 8-week follow-up, the S-CRP group had a clinically significant improvement in 6-minute walk test distance (Δ117 ± 76 vs. Δ91 ± 110 m; P = 0.02). Patients in the S-CRP were more likely to participate (87% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and adhere (72% vs. 22%, P < 0.001) to a cardiac rehabilitation program. Compared to UC, patients receiving S-CRP had similar smoking cessation rates, LDL-cholesterol levels, blood pressure reduction, depression, anxiety and quality of life measures (all P = NS).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACS, a S-CRP, as an adjunct to UC improved exercise capacity at 8 weeks in addition to participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12616000426482).

Impact of Physician Referral to Health Coaching on Patient Engagement and Health Risks: An Observational Study of UPMC's Prescription for Wellness

PURPOSE

Evaluate impact of physician referral to health coaching on patient engagement and health risk reduction.

DESIGN

Four-year retrospective, observational cohort study with propensity-matched pair comparisons.

SETTING

Integrated delivery and finance system in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

SAMPLE

10 457 adult insured members referred to health coaching by their physician; 37 864 other members identified for health coaching through insurer-initiated outreach.

INTERVENTION

Practice-based, technology-supported workflow and process for physician prescribing of health coaching during regular office visit, with follow-up on patient's progress and implementation supports.

MEASURES

Patient engagement based on completion of pre-enrollment assessment, formal enrollment in health coaching, completion of required sessions, health risk levels, and number of health risks pre- and post-health coaching referral.

ANALYSIS

Difference-in-difference analysis to assess change in health risk levels and number of health risks pre- and post-health coaching and probability weighting to control for potential confounding between groups.

RESULTS

Members referred by a physician were significantly more likely to enroll in a health coaching program (21.0% vs 6.0%, P < .001) and complete the program requirements (8.5% vs 2.7%, P < .001) than when referred by insurer-initiated outreach; significant within group improvement in health risk levels from baseline (P < .001) was observed for both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are significantly more likely to engage in health coaching when a referral is made by a physician; engagement in health coaching significantly improves health risk levels.

The Brain Health Champion study: Health coaching changes behaviors in patients with cognitive impairment

INTRODUCTION

Converging evidence suggests that increasing healthy behaviors may slow or prevent cognitive decline.

METHODS

We piloted a six-month, randomized, controlled investigation of 40 patients with mild dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or subjective cognitive decline. The intervention consisted of weekly motivational interviewing phone calls and three visits with a "Brain Health Champion" health coach, who guided participants to achieve personalized goals. Changes in behavior were measured using validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

Compared with the standard-of-care control group, Brain Health Champion participants had statistically significant and clinically meaningful increases in physical activity (Cohen's d = 1.37, P < .001), adherence to the Mediterranean diet (Cohen's d = 0.87, P = .016), cognitive/social activity (Cohen's d = 1.09, P = .003), and quality of life (Cohen's d = 1.23, P < .001). The magnitude of behavior change strongly predicted improvement in quality of life.

DISCUSSION

Our results demonstrate the feasibility and potential efficacy of a health coaching approach in changing health behaviors in cognitively impaired and at-risk patients.

A new clinical perspective: Treating obesity with nutritional coaching versus energy-restricted diets

Although current guidelines for obesity treatment endorse lifestyle modifications to achieve weight loss, energy-restricted diets are still the most commonly used method for the management of overweight. Diet restriction, however, not only is ineffective in promoting long-term weight loss but also may have more costs than benefits, predisposing the individual to fat regain. Several physiological and psychological mechanisms protect the body against starvation and explain how food restriction can promote paradoxically the opposite of what it is planned to achieve, triggering changes in energy metabolism, endocrine function and, thus, body composition. New approaches that focus on behavioral treatment without diet restriction, such as nutritional coaching, are showing strong growth that arises as an innovative way to create sustainable and effective lifestyle changes.

Erickson health coaching: An innovative approach for weight management in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea?

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent medical condition and amajor cardiovascular risk factor. Obesity is present in ∼70% of patients with OSA, nevertheless, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation - the gold standard therapy for moderate and severe OSA - has no appreciable long-term beneficial effects on obesity, body composition, energy metabolism, physical activities or the incidence of major cardiovascular events. Therefore, effective weight loss strategies in conjunction with CPAP therapy in OSA are critically needed. Since lifestyle interventions may positively impact body weight, there is a strong rationale to testing the hypothesis that Erikson coaching intervention as a form of lifestyle intervention to obese patients with OSA may increase their adherence to healthy lifestyle behaviour and thus result in weight reduction, improved body composition (reduction in %body fat) and improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism. There are three lines of evidence to justify testing this hypothesis: First, health coaching significantly facilitates uptake of healthy behaviours across a broad variety of chronic conditions; second, several randomized clinical trials suggested positive impact of health coaching on weight management and on cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight/obese otherwise healthy persons; third, Erickson coaching approach empowers the three key elements of health coaching (patient-centeredness, patient-determined goals, use of a self-discovery process) further, namely by introducing two other specific core elements into the coaching process: a) solution-focus and outcome frame, b) orientation at the patient-formulated positive outcomes (i.e., positive values resulting from behavioural change). Importantly, results of our recent pilot observational cohort study suggested that Erickson coaching is a powerful tool to address behavioural modification in obesity. In conclusion, testing our hypothesis may have significant clinical implications: if clinical randomized trials indicate that Erickson health coaching is an efficient approach to behavioural change and weight management in OSA then combining Erickson coaching with CPAP therapy may result in reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in these high-risk patients.