Outcome in breast molecular subtypes according to nodal status and surgical procedures

Local/Regional Recurrence Rates After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients Enrolled in Legacy Trials of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (AFT-01)

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate local/regional recurrence rates after breast-conserving surgery in a cohort of patients enrolled in legacy trials of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology and to evaluate variation in recurrence rates by receptor subtype.

BACKGROUND

Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated equivalent survival between breast conservation and mastectomy, albeit with higher local/regional recurrence rates after breast conservation. However, absolute rates of local/regional recurrence have been declining with multi-modality treatment.

METHODS

Data from 5 Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology legacy trials that enrolled women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1997 and 2010 were included. Women who underwent breast-conserving surgery and standard systemic therapies (n=4,404) were included. Five-year rates of local/regional recurrence were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients were censored at the time of distant recurrence (if recorded as the first recurrence), death, or last follow-up. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with time to local/regional recurrence, including patient age, tumor size, lymph node status, and receptor subtype.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year recurrence was 4.6% (95% CI=4.0-5.4%). Five-year recurrence rates were lowest in those with ER+ or PR+ tumors (Her2+ 3.4% [95% CI 2.0-5.7%], Her2- 4.0% [95% CI 3.2-4.9%]) and highest in the triple-negative subtype (7.1% [95% CI 5.4-9.3%]). On multivariable analysis, increasing nodal involvement and triple-negative subtype were positively associated with recurrence ( P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of local/regional recurrence after breast conservation in women with breast cancer enrolled in legacy trials of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology are significantly lower than historic estimates. This data can better inform patient discussions and surgical decision-making.

Prognostic disparities in young patients based on breast cancer subtype: A population-based study from the SEER database

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with younger age and worse long-term survival. However, the characteristics and prognosis of different subtypes of breast cancer (BC) in young (<40 years) patients have not yet been elucidated. The present population-based study explored the clinical and pathological characteristics of young TNBC patients and investigated their long-term survival. We enrolled patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database younger than 40 years of age with primary BC. Cases were defined as patients with TNBC (hormone receptor [HR]-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-), and controls were patients with other subtypes of BC (HR-/HER2+, HR+/HER2-, and HR+/HER2+). Demographic, pathological, and radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery data were extracted and the overall survival was the primary endpoint. We enrolled 14,234 young patients with BC in the present study, of whom 2798 (19.7%) had TNBC and 11,436 (80.3%) had another BC subtype. A higher proportion of TNBC patients than non-TNBC patients had a more advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage (II-IV 80.5% vs 73.1%, P < .001), and smaller proportions underwent radiotherapy (50.0% vs 53.3%, P = .002) and surgery (91.8% vs 92.9%, P < .001). TNBC was associated with significantly lower 5-year survival rates than other subtypes among patients with regional node positivity (0, 1-3, 4-9, ≥10: 54.2% vs 57.7%, 44.2% vs 55.9%, 31.0% vs 52.0%, and 27.7% vs 38.8%, P < .001) and those with different lymph node ratios (low, intermediate, high: 50.9% vs 56.0%, 34.6% vs 53.6%, and 24.8% vs 44.8%, P < .001). Our research is the first to investigate the relevant characteristics of young TNBC patients in comparison with those of young non-TNBC patients based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. We found that young TNBC patients have a higher pathological stage and worse long-term survival than young patients with other BC subtypes. These findings have implications in identifying young patients with TNBC for aggressive therapy and further investigations should be performed to explore new multimodal treatments for such patients.

The regrouping of Luminal B (HER2 negative), a better discriminator of outcome and recurrence score

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. High recurrence risk Luminal BC receives adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to standard hormone therapy. Considering the heterogeneity of Luminal B BC, a more accurate classification model is urgently needed.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 1603 patients who were diagnosed with HER2-negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma. According to the expression level of PR and Ki-67 index, the Luminal B (HER2-negative) BCs were divided into three groups: ER+PR-Ki67_low (ER-positive, PR-negative, and Ki-67 index <20%), ER+PR+Ki67_high (ER-positive, PR-positive, and Ki-67 index ≥20%), and ER+PR-Ki67_high (ER-positive, PR-negative, and Ki-67 index ≥20%). The cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the correlation between each variable and outcomes. Besides, discriminatory accuracy of the models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and log-rank χ² value.

RESULTS

The analysis results showed that there was a significant correlation between subtypes using this newly defined classification and overall survival (p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients in the ER+PR-Ki67_high subgroup have the worst survival outcome in Luminal B (HER2-negative) subtype, similar to Triple-negative patients. Besides, the ER+PR+Ki67_high has worse 5-year DFS compared with Luminal A group. There was a significant relationship between the regrouping subtype and the recurrence score index (RI) (p < 0.001). Moreover, the results showed that patients in ER+PR-Ki67_high subtype were more likely to have high RI for distance recurrence (RI-DR) and local recurrence (RI-LRR). Our newly defined classification has a better discrimination ability to predict survival outcome and recurrence score of Luminal B (HER2-negative) BC patients, which may help in clinical decision-making for individual treatment.

Upregulated WTAP expression appears to both promote breast cancer growth and inhibit lymph node metastasis

It is unclear as to whether Wilms' tumor 1-associated protein (WTAP) promotes or suppresses breast cancer. This immunohistochemistry analysis explored levels of WTAP expression in 347 cases of breast cancer and analyzed the relationship between WTAP expression and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients. The rate of high WTAP expression was significantly higher in breast cancer tissue than in adjacent normal breast tissue (37.5% vs 0.0%; P < 0.001). WTAP expression was positively associated with tumor size and grade, and negatively associated with axillary lymph node metastasis, estrogen and progesterone receptor status. Rates of high WTAP expression were 66.1% in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tissue and 31.3% in non-TNBC tissue. In multiple logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of WTAP expression in breast cancer included larger tumor size (odds ratio = 1.907; 95% confidence interval: 1.185-3.067; P = 0.008), lymph node metastasis (0.597; 0.373-0.956; P = 0.032) and TNBC status (3.735; 2.056-6.784; P < 0.001). No clear relationship was observed between patient prognosis and WTAP expression. We suggest that WTAP expression is upregulated in breast cancer and appears to both promote tumor growth and inhibit lymph node metastasis.

Spatiotemporal Patterns of Loco-Regional Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery

Background

Loco-regional recurrences (LRR) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) remain a heterogeneous class of disease that has significant variation in its biological behavior and prognosis.

Methods

To delineate the spatiotemporal patterns of LRR after BCS, we analyzed the data of 4325 patients treated with BCS from 2006 to 2016. Clinico-pathological and treatment specific factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify factors predictive for LRR events. Recurrence patterns were scrutinized based on recurrence type and recurrence-free interval (RFI). Annual recurrence rates (ARR) were compared according to recurrence type and molecular subtype.

Results

With a median follow-up of 66 months, 120 (2.8%) LRRs were recorded as the first site of failure. Age, pathologic stage, and molecular subtype were identified as predictors of LRR. The major recurrence type was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, which mainly (83.6%) occurred ≤5y post surgery. In the overall population, ARR curves showed that relapse peaked in the first 2.5 years. Patients with regional nodal recurrence, shorter RFI, and synchronous distant metastasis were associated with a poorer prognosis. HER2-positive disease had a higher rate of LRR events, more likely to have in-breast recurrence, and had an earlier relapse peak in the first 2 years after surgery.

Conclusions

LRR risk following BCS is generally low in Chinese ethnicity. Different recurrence patterns after BCS were related to distinct clinical outcomes. Management of LRR should be largely individualized and tailored to the extent of disease, the molecular profile of the recurrence, and to baseline clinical variables.

How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?

Lymph node status is one of the best prognostic factors in breast cancer, however, its association with distant metastasis is not straightforward. Here we compare molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, with major focus on luminal A patients. We analyze a new cohort of 706 patients (MMCI_706) as well as an independent cohort of 836 primary tumors with full gene expression information (SUPERTAM_HGU133A). We evaluate the risk of distant metastasis, analyze targetable molecular mechanisms in Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and identify relevant inhibitors. Lymph node positivity is generally associated with NF-κB and Src pathways and is related to high risk (OR: 5.062 and 2.401 in MMCI_706 and SUPERTAM_HGU133A, respectively, p < 0.05) of distant metastasis in luminal A patients. However, a part (≤15%) of lymph node negative tumors at the diagnosis develop the distant metastasis which is related to cell proliferation control and thrombolysis. Distant metastasis of lymph node positive patients is mostly associated with immune response. These pro-metastatic mechanisms further vary in other molecular subtypes. Our data indicate that the management of breast cancer and prevention of distant metastasis requires stratified approach based on targeted strategies.

The reciprocal influences of prognosis between two types of surgical interventions and early breast cancer patients with diverse luminal subtypes: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate and compare the effects of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy on the disease recurrence and long-term survival in early-stage luminal breast cancer and the difference in prognosis across diverse luminal subtypes receiving single surgical modality.

METHODS

The databases of PubMed and Embase were retrieved to select eligible trials that were published from inception to 13 November 2018. The clinical trials that offered the details about recurrent disease and/or survival in luminal tumors underwent BCT or mastectomy met the inclusion criteria (n=24). With the random- or fixed-effect model basing on heterogeneity Chi test with its significant level of P < .1, pooled odds ratio (OR) with its 95% CI, and P value were identified for endpoints.

RESULTS

The analyzed data were constituted of 25 qualified trials with 13,032 unique women suffered from luminal cancers. The fixed-effect models were utilized. On the LRR regarding BCT versus mastectomy, the pooled data indicated no significant difference in luminal carcinomas (OR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.43-1.64; P = .61; n = 867). In BCT cohort, the pooled data showed that there were some significant benefits favoring luminal A over luminal B in LR (OR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.46-0.81; P = .0007; n = 5406), DM (OR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.41-0.69; P < .00001; n = 4662), DFS (OR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.36-0.96; P = .03; n = 776) and OS (OR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.42-0.99; P = .05; n = 1149), but not in LRR (OR, 0.74; 95%CI, 0.48-1.13; P = .16; n = 3732), coupled with luminal A/B over luminal-HER2 in LRR (OR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.25-0.76; P = .004; n = 890), DM (OR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.35-0.90; P = .02; n = 1396), DFS (OR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.27-0.83; P = .009; n = 532); in mastectomy cohort, there were apparent advantages of LRR (OR, 0.58; 95%CI, 0.36-0.92; P = .02; n = 1768), LR (OR,0.56; 95%CI, 0.38-0.83; P = .004; n = 1209), DM (OR, 0.58; 95%CI, 0.40-0.84; P = .004; n = 652) and OS (OR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.43-0.89; P = .009; n = 652) in luminal A vs luminal B.

CONCLUSION

For early luminal breast cancer, the equality of LRR was achieved in BCT and mastectomy. In comparison, luminal A cancers benefit the most improved tumor re-appearence and survival in luminal diseases regardless of the option of surgical modality, whereas luminal-HER2 is affected by the worst clinical outcomes in them who follows BCT.

Prognostic Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System in 24,014 Korean Patients with Breast Cancer

Purpose

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recently released the breast cancer staging system, 8th edition, which included additional four biologic factors. However, there has been no external validation of the prognostic value of the new stages with different population-based databases.

Methods

To validate the prognostic value of the new staging system in the Asian population, with a focus on Korean patients with breast cancer, we performed a retrospective study with data from the Korean Breast Cancer Society that included 24,014 patients with invasive ductal or lobular carcinoma who underwent surgery between January 2009 and January 2012 in Korea. The proportional differences were evaluated between the anatomic staging system (AJCC 7th edition) and the prognostic staging system (AJCC 8th edition, December 2017 published version). Comparisons of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) with Kaplan-Meier graphs and hazard ratios were also performed.

Results

Our analysis included 24,014 patients (median age, 50 years; range, 20–91 years). Stage I, II, and III disease accounted for 47.6%, 43.5%, and 8.9%, respectively, of anatomic stages and 61.8%, 27.6%, and 10.8%, respectively, of clinical prognostic stages. A total of 6,272 cases (26.1%) were upstaged, 4,656 (19.4%) were downstaged, and 13,086 (54.5%) remained unchanged. OS and DFS decreased in the order from prognostic stages IA to IIIC but did not change among the anatomic stage groups.

Conclusion

Our data suggests that the prognostic staging system provides superior prognostic value to the anatomic staging system in Korean patients with breast cancer.

The prognostic value of node status in different breast cancer subtypes

Nodal metastases and breast cancer subtypes (BCS) are both well-recognized prognostic indicators. However, the association between nodal metastases and BCS, and the prognostic value of nodal metastases in different BCS are still remains unclear. Our aim was to investigate the association between nodal metastases and BCS, and the prognostic value of nodal metastases in the different BCS.

We found that the breast cancer subtype was closely associated with the pN stage. pN stage and breast cancer subtype were significantly associated with disease-free survival. The subgroup analysis showed that the patients in higher pN stage had a poor outcome than patients in lower pN stage in each breast cancer subtype. Furthermore, when the analysis was stratified by breast cancer subtype, we found that even in the same pN stage (pN0-pN2), there was significant survival difference among patients in different BCS, and Luminal A breast cancer patients had the best survival outcome. However, there were no significant survival difference between Luminal A patients and other breast cancer subtype when patients in pN3 stage. Thus, our study suggested that both lymph node status and molecular subtype played important roles in the outcome of breast cancer patients and they cannot replace each other.

The combined pN stage and breast cancer subtypes in breast cancer: a better discriminator of outcome can be used to refine the 8th AJCC staging manual

BACKGROUND

pN stage and breast cancer subtypes (BCS) are both well-recognized prognostic indicators. Our previous work has highlighted that patients even with the same pN stage exhibited a significant survival difference in different BCS. Given this achievement, we hypothesized that a statistical interaction might exist between pN stage and BCS. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the prognostic value of the combined pN stage and BCS (pN_new stage) with either pN stage or BCS alone, and to determine if this combined new stage could serve as an alternative discriminator of outcome.

METHODS

We combined pN stage and BCS to create a new variable named pN_new stage and then divided it into four groups: pN0_new, pN1_new, pN2_new, and pN3_new. Survival analysis was performed with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used for univariate analysis. For multivariate analysis, cox proportional hazard models were applied, allowing for the estimation of disease-free survival (DFS). To assess discriminatory accuracy of the models, we compared the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) values. Then, we used this pN_new stage to generate a TN_newM staging system according to the 7th AJCC staging system.

RESULTS

A statistical interaction between pN stage and BCS was found. In multivariate survival analysis, the pN_new stage has been confirmed as an independent prognostic variable of 5-year DFS. The pN_new stage, with a smaller AIC or BIC value and larger AUROC, was a more powerful predictor of DFS than either pN stage or BCS alone. Results were validated in a separate cohort of patients. The TN_newM stage proposed in our present study was found comparable to the new 8th AJCC edition which includes anatomic T, N, and M plus tumor grade and the status of the biomarkers Her-2, ER, and PR with respect to prognostic value for breast cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The pN_new stage (combined pN stage and BCS) appears to be a more powerful predictor and discriminator for the outcome of breast cancer, as compared to pN stage or BCS alone, and the TN_newM stage may serve as a simple, easy-to-use alternative to the 8th AJCC edition staging manual.

Precision medicine in breast cancer: reality or utopia?

Many cancers, including breast cancer, have demonstrated prognosis and support advantages thanks to the discovery of targeted therapies. The advent of these new approaches marked the rise of precision medicine, which leads to improve the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer. Precision medicine takes into account the molecular and biological specificities of the patient and their tumors that will influence the treatment determined by physicians. This new era of medicine is accessible through molecular genetics platforms, the development of high-speed sequencers and means of analysis of these data. Despite the spectacular results in the treatment of cancers including breast cancer, described in this review, not all patients however can benefit from this new strategy. This seems to be related to the many genetic mutations, which may be different from one patient to another or within the same patient. It comes to give new impetus to the research—both from a technological and biological point of view—to make the hope of precision medicine accessible to all.

A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Utility of AJCC 8th Edition Cancer Staging System for Breast Cancer

Background

The aim was to study the clinical utility of AJCC 8th edition prognostic stage system for patients with breast cancer.

Methods

According to the AJCC 8th edition cancer staging system, a total of 784 patients with breast cancer diagnosed by Department of Breast Surgery in Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from January 2011 to June 2016 were analyzed in anatomic and prognostic stage.

Results

Five hundred and five (64.4%) patients prognosis staging changed compared with anatomic stage. Among them, 63 (33.5%) patients were in stage I, 295 (73.8%) patients in stage II, and 128 (72.7%) patients in stage III according to anatomic stage, respectively. The distribution and variety of the anatomic and prognostic stage differ in intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

AJCC 8th edition cancer staging system is an important prognostic factor for disease outcome of breast cancer.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival on the base of modified lymph node ratio in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer and previous studies indicated that lymph node ratio (LNR) could better predict the outcome than the counting of positive lymph nodes. In the current study, we evaluated the prognostic effect of modified LNR in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 3339 breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph nodes dissection were enrolled and respectively analyzed. Seventy five percent of participants were randomly selected as training cohort and the remaining 25% were as validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed and the prognostic impact of mLNR was compared with pN staging. A prognostic nomogram was established and externally validated in the validation cohort.

RESULT

In multivariate analysis, both the mLNR and pN staging were independent prognostic factors for breast cancer patients, and the mLNR manifested superior discrimination power than the pN stages regardless of the total number of lymph nodes retrieved and the lymph node status. The nomogram was built including the identified independent prognostic factors and the calibration curves indicated optimal agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observation. The Concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram was statistically higher than that of the TNM system (0.747 vs. 0.711 in training cohort, 0.789 vs. 0.760 in validation cohort, both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Modified LNR is an important prognostic parameter and can predict survival more accurately than pN staging. The novel nomogram could provide individual prediction for breast cancer patients and help clinicians in treatment option making and prognosis evaluation.

Prognosis of breast cancer molecular subtypes in routine clinical care: A large prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In Germany, most breast cancer patients are treated in specialized breast cancer units (BCU), which are certified, and routinely monitored. Herein, we evaluate up-to-date oncological outcome of breast cancer (BC) molecular subtypes in routine clinical care of a specialized BCU.

METHODS

The study was a prospectively single-center cohort study of 4102 female cases with primary, unilateral, non-metastatic breast cancer treated between 01 January 2003 and 31 December 2012. The five routinely used molecular subtypes (Luminal A-like, Luminal B/HER2 negative-like, Luminal B/HER2 positive-like, HER2-type, Triple negative) were analyzed. The median follow-up time of the whole cohort was 55 months. We calculated estimates for local control rate (LCR), disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and relative overall survival (ROS).

RESULTS

Luminal A-like tumors were the most frequent (44.7 %) and showed the best outcome with LCR of 99.1 % (95 % CI 98.5; 99.7), OS of 95.1 % (95 % CI 93.7; 96.5), and ROS of 100.0 % (95 % CI 98.5; 101.5). Triple negative tumors (12.3 %) presented the poorest outcome with LCR of 89.6 % (95 % CI 85.8; 93.4), OS of 78.5 % (95 % CI 73.8; 83.3), and ROS of 80.1 % (95 % CI 73.8; 83.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a favorable subtype can expect an OS above 95 % and an LCR of almost 100 % over 5 years. On the other hand the outcome of patients with HER2 and Triple negative subtypes remains poor, thus necessitating more intensified research and care.

Prognosis of breast cancer molecular subtypes in routine clinical care: A large prospective cohort study

Background

In Germany, most breast cancer patients are treated in specialized breast cancer units (BCU), which are certified, and routinely monitored. Herein, we evaluate up-to-date oncological outcome of breast cancer (BC) molecular subtypes in routine clinical care of a specialized BCU.

Methods

The study was a prospectively single-center cohort study of 4102 female cases with primary, unilateral, non-metastatic breast cancer treated between 01 January 2003 and 31 December 2012. The five routinely used molecular subtypes (Luminal A-like, Luminal B/HER2 negative-like, Luminal B/HER2 positive-like, HER2-type, Triple negative) were analyzed. The median follow-up time of the whole cohort was 55 months. We calculated estimates for local control rate (LCR), disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and relative overall survival (ROS).

Results

Luminal A-like tumors were the most frequent (44.7 %) and showed the best outcome with LCR of 99.1 % (95 % CI 98.5; 99.7), OS of 95.1 % (95 % CI 93.7; 96.5), and ROS of 100.0 % (95 % CI 98.5; 101.5). Triple negative tumors (12.3 %) presented the poorest outcome with LCR of 89.6 % (95 % CI 85.8; 93.4), OS of 78.5 % (95 % CI 73.8; 83.3), and ROS of 80.1 % (95 % CI 73.8; 83.2).

Conclusions

Patients with a favorable subtype can expect an OS above 95 % and an LCR of almost 100 % over 5 years. On the other hand the outcome of patients with HER2 and Triple negative subtypes remains poor, thus necessitating more intensified research and care.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2766-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With an Initial Diagnosis of Cytology-Proven Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) is the standard treatment of node-negative breast cancer; however, whether SNB should be performed for patients with node-positive disease before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. We evaluated the accuracy of SNB after NAC in patients with breast cancer with nodal metastasis before chemotherapy to determine the false-negative rate (FNR) and detection rate for SNB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the present multicenter prospective study performed from September 2011 to April 2013, 143 patients with breast cancer and positive axillary nodes, proved by fine needle aspiration cytology at the initial diagnosis (stage T1-T3N1M0), were enrolled. All patients underwent breast surgery with SNB and complete axillary lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

After NAC, the pathologic complete nodal response rate was 52.4%. The sentinel lymph node could be identified in 130 cases (90.9%); the FNR was 16.0% (13 of 81). The FNR of each clinical subtype was 42.1% (8 of 19) for the estrogen receptor-positive and human epithelial growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative (luminal type), 16.7% (2 of 12) for ER-positive and HER2-positive (luminal-HER2 type), 3.2% (1 of 31) for HER2-positive (HER2-enriched type), and 10.5% (2 of 19) for ER-negative and HER2-negative (triple-negative breast cancer; P = .003). The FNR was significantly greater in the luminal than in the nonluminal type (odds ratio, 9.91; 95% confidence interval, 6.77-14.52).

CONCLUSION

SNB after NAC in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer was technically feasible but should not be recommended for the luminal subtype. However, the tumor subtype can guide patient selection, and axillary lymph node dissection could be omitted for the luminal-HER2, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer subtypes.

Breast cancer subtypes can be determinant in the decision making process to avoid surgical axillary staging: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The need for performing axillary lymph-node dissection in early breast cancer when the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is positive has been questioned in recent years. The purpose of this study was to identify a low-risk subgroup of early breast cancer patients in whom surgical axillary staging could be avoided, and to assess the probability of having a positive lymph-node (LN).

METHODS

We evaluated the cohort of 612 consecutive women affected by early breast cancer. We considered age, tumor size, histological grade, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion and cancer subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B HER-2+, Luminal B HER-2-, HER-2+, and Triple Negative) as variables for univariate and multivariate analyses to assess probability of there being a positive SLN o nonsentinel lymph node (NSLN). Chi-square, Fisher's Exact test and Student's t tests were used to investigate the relationship between variables; whereas logit models were used to estimate and quantify the strength of the relationship among some covariates and SLN or the number of metastases.

RESULTS

A significant positive effect of vascular invasion and lymphatic invasion (odds ratios are 4 and 6), and a negative effect of TN (odds ratios is 10) were noted. With respect to positive NSLN, size alone has a significant (positive) effect on tumor presence, but focusing on the number of metastases, also age has a (negative) significant effect.

CONCLUSION

This work shows correlation between subtypes and the probability of having positive SLN. Patients not expressing vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion and, moreover, a triple-negative tumor subtype may be good candidates for breast conservative surgery without axillary surgical staging.

Predictive Factors for Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in the Case of Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Two or Fewer Nodes in Breast Cancer

Background

In breast cancer, recent clinical trials have shown that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone without axillary lymph node dissection results in excellent prognosis if there is sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in two or fewer nodes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between non-SLN metastasis and clinicopathological factors in case of SLN metastasis in two or fewer nodes in breast cancer.

Methods

Patients who underwent SLNB for invasive breast cancer and were found to have positive SLN in two or fewer nodes were evaluated. The associations between non-SLN metastasis and clinicopahological factors were examined. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

Results

A total of 358 patients were enrolled during the study period and all of these patients were female and 54 patients had SLN metastasis (15%). Positive SLN in two or fewer nodes was identified in 44 patients (81.5%). Among these patients, 17 (38.6%) were found to have non-SLN metastasis. Non-SLN metastasis was associated with invasive tumor size (P = 0.015) and lymphatic involvement (P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size (P = 0.011) and lymphatic involvement (P = 0.019) remained significant independent predictors of non-SLN metastasis, and that an invasive tumor size cut-off point of 28 mm was useful for dividing patients with positive SLN in two or fewer nodes into non-SLN-positive and non-SLN-negative groups.

Conclusions

Non-SLN metastasis was found in more than 30% of patients with SLN metastasis present in two or fewer nodes. Large tumor size and the presence of lymphatic involvement were significantly associated with non-SLN metastasis.

Surgical Management of Breast Cancer in 2010-2011 SEER Registries by Hormone and HER2 Receptor Status

BACKGROUND

Although locoregional recurrence is known to affect overall survival for operable breast cancer, the impact of receptor status on locoregional control is debated. Currently, hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status are generally not considered relevant to surgical choice. This study examines recent population-level surgical trends with regard to receptor status.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to identify stage I-III female breast cancers diagnosed from 2010 to 2011. Patients were categorized by HR and HER2 receptor status. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess factors associated with undergoing mastectomy and the choice of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM).

RESULTS

The overall mastectomy rate for the 87,504 women diagnosed in 2010-2011 was 43.4 %. On multivariate analysis, the odds of receiving mastectomy was greater for HER2-positive disease with either HR-negative or HR-positive status, than for women with HER2-negative/HR-positive disease (odds ratio 1.73 and 1. 31, respectively; all p values <0.001). Age, stage, marital status, race, and year of diagnosis also correlated with mastectomy. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) was associated with CPM, while HER2 status was not. The mastectomy rate, which increased overall from 2006 to 2010, has continued to increase for stage III disease but has decreased for stage I disease. Mastectomy rates overall were lower in 2011 than 2010 (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-positive disease and TNBC were independent predictors of more extensive surgery in this large, recent, population-based cohort. Although mastectomy rates have continued to increase for stage III disease, mastectomy rates overall were lower in 2011 than in previous years.

The 2014 Society of Surgical Oncology Susan G. Komen for the Cure Symposium: triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an operational term that refers to a heterogeneous collection of breast cancers lacking expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, and HER2. These tumors account for 12-17 % of all breast cancers, preferentially affect young women, are more frequent in women of African and Hispanic descent, and are enriched in the population of patients diagnosed with "interval cancers." TNBCs account for the majority of breast cancers arising in BRCA1 germline mutation carriers (approximately 80%), and approximately 11-16% of all TNBCs harbor BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. Well-known risk factors for ER-positive cancers, such as reproductive history and hormonal factors, do not appear to have the same correlations for TNBC, and histologic risk factors for TNBC have not been identified. Patients with TNBC have a higher risk of both local and distant recurrence, but this is not mitigated by bigger surgery, and standard criteria should be used to select the approach to local therapy in these patients. Although platinum drugs have shown promise in the treatment of TNBC, standard chemotherapy remains the standard of care outside of a clinical trial.

Comparison of breast cancer recurrence and outcome patterns between patients treated from 1986 to 1992 and from 2004 to 2008

PURPOSE

To determine whether the patterns of relapse according to estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status changed in the contemporary era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Female patients referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency with biopsy-proven stage I to III breast cancer (BC), diagnosed between 1986 and 1992 (cohort 1 [C1]) and between mid-2004 and 2008 (cohort 2 [C2]), and with known ER and HER2 status were eligible. Data were prospectively collected. C2 patients were matched to C1 patients for stage, grade, and ER and HER2 status. The primary end point was hazard rate of relapse (HRR) for BC by study cohort according to biomarker status. Secondary outcomes included HRR according to stage, grade, and age and hazard rate of death (HRD).

RESULTS

After matching, 7,178 patients were included (3,589 patients in each cohort). BC subtype distribution was as following ER positive/HER2 negative, 70.8%; ER positive/HER2 positive, 6.9%; ER negative/HER2 positive, 6.6%; and ER negative/HER2 negative, 15.8%. For the overall population, the HRR approximately halved in all yearly intervals to year 9 in C2 compared with C1. Differences in HRR between cohorts were greater in the initial five intervals for HER2-positive and ER-negative/HER2-negative BC. The HRR decreased in C2 compared with C1 for all disease stages and grades. The HRD in C2 also decreased compared with C1, although to a lesser extent.

CONCLUSION

Although the pattern of relapse remains similar, there has been a significant improvement in BC relapse-free survival. Outcomes have improved for all BC subtypes, especially HER2-positive and ER-negative/HER2-negative BC, with the early spike in disease recurrence markedly decreased. These contemporary hazard rates are important for treatment decisions, patient discussions, and planning clinical trials of early BC.

Is the differentiation into molecular subtypes of breast cancer important for staging, local and systemic therapy, and follow up?

Breast cancer complexity has long been known and investigated. After a first classification of the disease based on histology features, starting from the 1980s breast cancers have been distinguished on the basis of oestrogen receptor expression and later according to HER2. By 2000 the "microarray revolution" had shown that the phenotypic differences between breast cancers were a reflection of their mRNA expression profiles, while the more recent "genomic revolution" is revealing the genomic bases of breast cancer heterogeneity. However, how this huge amount of data and knowledge translate into clinically relevant practice is currently not clear. In the present review we discuss how the different breast cancer classification methods might translate into improved clinical guidelines with regard to staging, therapy, and follow up of patients with breast cancer.

The prognostic value of lymph node status among breast cancer subtypes

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer subtypes (BCSs) are predictive of responses to specific therapies and of prognostic value for clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the relative 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival rates (RFS) based on lymph node (LN) status among BCSs.

METHODS

Medical records of 1,399 breast cancer patients treated from 2006 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Pathologic findings, type of treatment, and OS and RFS were evaluated for 5 molecular subtypes.

RESULTS

Luminal A cancers accounted for 40.9% of the total, luminal B 21.5%, luminal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) 24.8%, HER2 6.9%, and triple negative 5.9%, of which 30% (n = 395) were LN positive. Analysis of patient characteristics showed significant differences among BCSs in age, tumor size, LN status, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy. Adjustments for age and tumor size revealed significant differences in OS according to the nodal status in luminal A, luminal B, and luminal HER2 subtypes, and with RFS in the luminal B and luminal HER2 subtypes.

CONCLUSION

LN status in BCS presents an important prognostic factor of OS and RFS.

Comparative study of polymorphism frequencies of the CYP2D6, CYP3A5, CYP2C8 and IL-10 genes in Mexican and Spanish women with breast cancer

AIM

Pharmacogenetic studies in breast cancer (BC) may predict the efficacy of tamoxifen and the toxicity of paclitaxel and capecitabine. We determined the frequency of polymorphisms in the CYP2D6 gene associated with activation of tamoxifen, and those of the genes CYP2C8, CYP3A5 and DPYD associated with toxicity of paclitaxel and capecitabine. We also included a IL-10 gene polymorphism associated with advanced tumor stage at diagnosis.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Genomic DNAs from 241 BC patients from northeast Mexico were genotyped using DNA microarray technology.

RESULTS

For tamoxifen processing, CYP2D6 genotyping predicted that 90.8% of patients were normal metabolizers, 4.2% ultrarapid, 2.1% intermediate and 2.9% poor metabolizers. For paclitaxel and the CYP2C8 gene, 75.3% were normal, 23.4% intermediate and 1.3% poor metabolizers. Regarding the DPYD gene, only one patient was a poor metabolizer. For the IL-10 gene, 47.1% were poor metabolizers.

CONCLUSION

These results contribute valuable information towards personalizing BC chemotherapy in Mexican women.

Age and molecular subtypes: impact on surgical decisions

Both young patient age and breast cancer molecular subtype impact local recurrence rates and long-term prognosis for women with breast cancer. Although rates of local recurrence are consistently higher in young women and those with high-risk molecular subtypes, this risk does not appear to be overcome by more extensive surgery.

Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

To convene a multidisciplinary panel of breast experts to examine the relationship between margin width and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and develop a guideline for defining adequate margins in the setting of breast conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multidisciplinary consensus panel used a meta-analysis of margin width and IBTR from a systematic review of 33 studies including 28,162 patients as the primary evidence base for consensus.

RESULTS

Positive margins (ink on invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ) are associated with a 2-fold increase in the risk of IBTR compared with negative margins. This increased risk is not mitigated by favorable biology, endocrine therapy, or a radiation boost. More widely clear margins than no ink on tumor do not significantly decrease the rate of IBTR compared with no ink on tumor. There is no evidence that more widely clear margins reduce IBTR for young patients or for those with unfavorable biology, lobular cancers, or cancers with an extensive intraductal component.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of no ink on tumor as the standard for an adequate margin in invasive cancer in the era of multidisciplinary therapy is associated with low rates of IBTR and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcomes, and decrease health care costs.

Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

Controversy exists regarding the optimal margin width in breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary consensus panel used a meta-analysis of margin width and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) from a systematic review of 33 studies including 28,162 patients as the primary evidence base for consensus.

RESULTS

Positive margins (ink on invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ) are associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of IBTR compared with negative margins. This increased risk is not mitigated by favorable biology, endocrine therapy, or a radiation boost. More widely clear margins do not significantly decrease the rate of IBTR compared with no ink on tumor. There is no evidence that more widely clear margins reduce IBTR for young patients or for those with unfavorable biology, lobular cancers, or cancers with an extensive intraductal component.

CONCLUSION

The use of no ink on tumor as the standard for an adequate margin in invasive cancer in the era of multidisciplinary therapy is associated with low rates of IBTR and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcomes, and decrease health care costs. J Clin Oncol 32. 2014 American Society of Clinical Oncology®, American Society for Radiation Oncology®, and Society of Surgical Oncology®. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology.

Clinical significance of lymph node ratio in locally advanced breast cancer molecular subtypes

BACKGROUND

The ratio of metastatic to dissected lymph nodes (lymph node ratio; LNR) is a sensitive and superior prognostic factor for lymph node evaluation, but its relationship to cancer subtypes is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 469 patients with axillary lymph node metastasis out of 640 early breast cancer cases were retrospectively analyzed. They were classified into 4 molecular subtypes; luminal A, luminal B HER2(+), HER2 overexpression, basal-like. LNRs were compared between groups and with other prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The distribution of LNRs was 35.2% in luminal A, 43.2% in luminal B HER2(+), 46.9% in HER2 over-expression, and 39.1% in basal-like. A significant difference was found between luminal A and HER2 over-expression subtypes (p = 0.023). LNR was significantly correlated with tumor size and lymphovascular invasion, but not with other prognostic factors including menopausal status, laterality, grade, and perineural invasion. An LNR of 29.8% was defined as the cut-off value, and significant differences in survival rates were identified accordingly between basal-like and both luminal A (p = 0.003) and luminal B HER2(+) (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The LNR differs between some molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and it correlates with certain prognostic factors and survival. These data support using the LNR to assess breast cancer patients.