Perioperative tight glycemic control using artificial pancreas decreases infectious complications via suppression of inflammatory cytokines in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective, non-randomized clinical trial

Effects of an artificial pancreas on postoperative inflammation in patients with esophageal cancer

PURPOSES

Subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (EC) is associated with high morbidity rates. Tight glycemic control using an artificial pancreas (AP) is one of the promising strategies to reduce postoperative inflammation and morbidities. However, the effects of tight glycemic control using AP in patients with EC are yet to be fully elucidated.

METHOD

This study reviewed 96 patients with EC who underwent subtotal esophagectomy. The postoperative inflammation parameters and morbidity rates were compared between patients who used the AP (n = 27) or not (control group, n = 69). AP is a closed-loop system that comprises a continuous glucose monitor and an insulin pump.

RESULTS

The numbers of white blood cells (WBC) and Neutrophils (Neut) were noted to be lower in the AP group than in the control group, but with no significant difference. The ratio in which the number of WBC, Neut, and CRP on each postoperative day (POD) was divided by those tested preoperatively was used to standardize the results. The ratio of WBC and Neut on 1POD was significantly lower in the AP group than in the control group. The rate of surgical site infection was lower in the AP group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

AP significantly decreased WBC and Neut on 1POD; this suggests the beneficial effects of AP in alleviating postoperative inflammation.

Impact of Preoperative Diabetes Mellitus on Postoperative Outcomes in Elective Pancreatic Surgery and Its Implications for Prehabilitation Practice

OBJECTIVES

Patients with pancreatic disease(s) have a high risk of developing diabetes mellitus (DM). Diabetes mellitus is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and effects of DM on postoperative outcomes in pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Subgroup analysis of a prospective cohort study conducted at an academic hospital. Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy between January 2019 and November 2022 were included and screened for DM preoperatively using glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). New-onset DM was diagnosed based on HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol). Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without DM.

RESULTS

From 117 patients, 29 (24.8%) were given a diagnosis of DM, and of those, 5 (17.2%) were diagnosed with new-onset DM, and 15 (51.8%) displayed poorly controlled preoperative DM (HbA 1c ≥ 7% [53 mmol/mol]). The incidence of surgical site infections (48.3% vs 27.3% in the non-DM group; P = 0.04) was higher for patients with DM. This association remained significant after adjusting for confounders (odds ratio, 2.60 [95% confidence interval, 1.03-6.66]; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

One-quarter of the patients scheduled for pancreatoduodenectomy had DM; over half of them had poor glycemic control. The association between DM status and surgical site infections revealed in this study emphasizes the importance of adequate preoperative glycemic control.

What is the optimal range of glycemic control for non-diabetic patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery? A single-center randomized controlled trial using an artificial pancreas

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the optimal target range of perioperative glycemic control for gastroenterological surgery. A closed-loop-type artificial pancreas (AP) was used to diminish the negative impact of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability during tight glycemic control.

METHODS

In this single-center randomized trial, non-diabetic patients were assigned to tight (80-110 mg/dL) or moderate glycemic control (110-140 mg/dL) groups between August 2017 and May 2021. AP was used from the intraoperative period until discharge from the intensive care unit. The primary endpoint was the serum interleukin (IL)-6 level on the third postoperative day (3POD), and the secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Recruitment was closed before reaching the planned number of patients due to slow enrollment. Tight glycemic control (n = 62) resulted in lower mean glucose levels than moderate glycemic control (n = 66) (121.3 ± 10.8 mg/dL vs. 133.5 ± 12.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Insulin was administered at a 65% higher rate for tight glycemic control, achieving appropriate glucose control more than 70% of the treatment time. No hypoglycemia occurred during the AP treatment. No significant difference was observed in serum IL-6 levels on 3POD (23.4 ± 31.1 vs. 32.1 ± 131.0 pg/mL, p = 0.64), morbidity rate, surgical mortality rate, or length of hospital stay between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically relevant short-term results did not differ, implying that 80-110 and 110-140 mg/dL are permissible glycemic control ranges when using AP in non-diabetic patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery. (Registered in UMIN; UMIN000028036).

Fully Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery

The central role of pancreas in glucose regulation imposes high demands on perioperative glucose management in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. In a post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the perioperative use of subcutaneous (SC) fully closed-loop (FCL; CamAPS HX) versus usual care (UC) insulin therapy in patients undergoing partial or total pancreatic resection. Glucose control was compared using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics (% time with CGM values between 5.6 and 10.0 mmol/L and more). Over the time of hospitalization, FCL resulted in better glucose control than UC with more time spent in the target range 5.6-10.0 mmol/L (mean [standard deviation] % time in target 77.7% ± 4.6% and 41.1% ± 19.5% in FCL vs. UC subjects, respectively; mean difference 36.6% [95% confidence interval 18.5-54.8]), without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. Findings suggest that an adaptive SC FCL approach effectively accommodated the highly variable insulin needs in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04361799.

[Position statement: surgery and diabetes mellitus (Update 2023)]

This position statement reflects the perspective of the Austrian Diabetes Association concerning the perioperative management of people with diabetes mellitus based on the available scientific evidence. The paper covers necessary preoperative examinations from an internal/diabetological point of view as well as the perioperative metabolic control by means of oral antihyperglycemic and/or insulin therapy.

Comparison of Short-Term Surgical Outcomes According to Immediately Postoperative Serum Glucose Level in Non-Diabetic Pancreatic Resection Patients

The adequate regulation of postoperative serum glucose level (SGL) is widely accepted; however, the effects for non-diabetic patients who underwent major pancreatic surgery have not yet been established. We discerned the relevance of the immediately postoperative SGL to short-term postoperative outcomes from major pancreatic surgery in non-diabetic patients. Between January 2007 and December 2016, 2259 non-diabetic patients underwent major pancreatic surgery at four tertiary medical centers in Republic of Korea. Based on a SGL of 200 mg/dL, patients were classified into two groups by averaging the results of four SGL tests taken on the first day after surgery, and their short-term postoperative outcomes were analyzed. A 1:1 propensity score matching method was conducted to establish the high SGL group (n = 568) and the normal SGL group (n = 568). The high SGL group experienced a significantly higher rate of level C complications in the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDc) than the normal SGL group (24.1% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.002). Additionally, an SGL of more than 200 mg/dL was associated with a significantly high risk of complications above level C CDc after adjusting for other risk factors (hazard ratio = 1.324, 95% confidence interval = 1.048–1.672, p = 0.019). The regulation of SGL of less than 200 mg/dL in non-diabetic patients early after major pancreatic surgery could be helpful for reducing postoperative complications.

Glycemic Control Regimens in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background

Increased risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by hyperglycemia makes it necessary to follow perioperative glucose lowering strategies to reduce postoperative complications. A meta-analysis was conducted to understand the efficacy of intensive vs. conventional blood glucose lowering regimens on the incidence of SSIs and hypoglycemia from various randomized controlled studies (RCTs).

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and Central databases for RCTs that involved intensive (lower blood glucose target levels) vs. conventional (higher blood glucose target levels) strategies in patients undergoing various types of surgeries. The primary outcomes were SSIs or postoperative wound infections. Hypoglycemia and mortality outcomes were also studied. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR), and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 29 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis with the information from 14,126 patients. A reduction in overall incidence of SSIs was found (RR 0.63, 0.50-0.80, p = 0.0002, I 2= 56%). Subgroup analyses showed that intensive insulin regimens decreased the risk of SSIs in patients with diabetes, in cardiac and abdominal surgical procedures, and during the intraoperative and postoperative phases of surgery. However, the risk of hypoglycemia and mortality was increased in the intensive group compared to the conventional group.

Conclusion

The results of the meta-analysis provide support for the use of intensive insulin regimens during the perioperative phase for decreasing the incidence of SSIs in certain patient populations and surgical categories.

Intensive glucose control during the perioperative period for diabetic patients undergoing surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of intensive glucose control on diabetic patients undergoing surgery.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to 13 December 2020.

SETTING

Operating room, postoperative recovery area and ward, up to 30 days after surgery.

PATIENTS

Diabetic patients undergoing surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

We used Review Manager 5.4 to pool the data with a random-effects model. The quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcomes were infectious complications, postoperative mortality, and hypoglycaemia. The secondary outcomes included atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, stroke, delirium, renal failure, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 1582 participants were included. Compared with conventional glucose control, intensive glucose control was associated with a lower risk of infectious complications (risk ratio [RR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.63; low-quality evidence), atrial fibrillation (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.71; high-quality evidence), and renal failure (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.95; moderate-quality evidence), as well as a shorter length of stay in the ICU (mean difference (MD), -0.55 day; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.05 days; very-low-quality evidence) and hospital (MD, -1.61 days; 95% CI, -2.78 to -0.44 days; very-low-quality evidence). However, intensive glucose control was associated with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia (RR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.97-4.55; high-quality evidence). There were no significant differences in postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, delirium, or postoperative mechanical ventilation time.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive glucose control in diabetic patients is associated with a reduction in some adverse postoperative outcomes including infectious complications, but also appears to increase the risk of hypoglycaemia. Further well-designed studies may be needed to determine appropriate regimens to reduce hypoglycaemia incidence.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021226138.

Closed-loop artificial endocrine pancreas from Japan

The development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas (AP) in the Western countries and Japan is different. In Western countries, wearable AP with a closed-loop glycemic control system has been developed as a treatment for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. On the contrary, in Japan, bedside closed-loop AP explored by a Japanese company (Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) has developed as perioperative glycemic control device in surgical patients and acute care patients with emergency. In this article, we reviewed the scientific evidence in the past and present and future prospects of perioperative glycemic control using bedside AP with a closed-loop system in Japan. Conventional perioperative strict glycemic controls have three major problems: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and variability in blood glucose concentrations. In Japan, perioperative strict glycemic control using the current bedside AP STG-55 (Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) has been developed since 2010. This novel glycemic control method achieved not only stable glycemic control without hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and less variability of blood glucose concentrations but also reduced postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing major surgeries. Among the rapidly increasing number of surgical or emergency patients with diabetes, frailty, and sarcopenia of intrinsic glucose intolerance, more sophisticated and smaller AP available easily in operating rooms and intensive care units will be warranted to promote improved therapeutic outcomes in such critically ill patients.