1
|
Altaf A, Munir MM, Khan MMM, Thammachack R, Rashid Z, Khalil M, Catalano G, Pawlik TM. Impact of patient, hospital, and operative characteristics relative to social determinants of health: Compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00502-X. [PMID: 38878955 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite an established association with improved patient outcomes, compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines remains suboptimal. We sought to assess the effect of patient characteristics (PCs), operative characteristics (OCs), hospital characteristics (HCs), and social determinants of health (SDoH) on noncompliance with NCCN guidelines for colon cancer. METHODS Patients treated for stage I to III colon cancer from 2004 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Multilevel multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with receipt of NCCN-compliant care and quantify the proportion of variance explained by PCs, OCs, HCs, and SDoH. RESULTS Among 468,097 patients with colon cancer treated across 1319 hospitals, 1 in 4 patients did not receive NCCN-compliant care (122,170 [26.1%]). On regression analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.96-0.96), female sex (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), Black race (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98), higher Charlson-Deyo score (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86), tumor stage ≥II (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.40-0.44), and tumor grade ≥ 3 (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.32-0.34) were associated with lower odds of receiving NCCN-compliant care (all P values <.05). Higher hospital volume (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03), minimally invasive or robotic surgical approach (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.23-1.29), adequate (≥12) lymph node assessment (OR, 3.46; 95% CI, 3.38-3.53), private insurance status (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.26-1.40), Medicare insurance status (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.35-1.49), and higher educational status (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) were associated with higher odds of receiving NCCN-compliant care (all P values <.05). Overall, PCs contributed 36.5%, HCs contributed 1.3%, and OCs contributed 12.9% to the variation in guideline-compliant care, while SDoH contributed only 3.6% of the variation in receipt of NCCN-compliant care. CONCLUSION The variation in NCCN-compliant care among patients with colon cancer was largely attributable to patient- and surgeon-level factors, whereas SDoH were associated with a smaller proportion of the variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Altaf
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Razeen Thammachack
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Zayed Rashid
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Mujtaba Khalil
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Giovanni Catalano
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olecki EJ, Perez Holguin RA, Mayhew MM, Wong WG, Vining CC, Peng JS, Shen C, Dixon MEB. Disparities in Surgical Treatment of Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at Minority Serving Hospitals. J Surg Res 2024; 294:160-168. [PMID: 37897875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minority serving hospitals (MSH) are those serving a disproportionally high number of minority patients. Previous research has demonstrated that treatment at MSH is associated with worse outcomes. We hypothesize that patients treated at MSH are less likely to undergo surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to patients treated at non-MSH. METHODS Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer were identified using the National Cancer Database. Institutions treating Black and Hispanic patients in the top decile were categorized as an MSH. Factors associated with the primary outcome of definitive surgical resection were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Univariate and multivariable survival analysis was performed. RESULTS Of the 75,513 patients included in this study, 7.2% were treated at MSH. Patients treated at MSH were younger, more likely to be uninsured, and higher stage compared to those treated at non-MSH (P < 0.001). Patients treated at MSH underwent surgical resection at lower rates (MSH 40% versus non-MSH 44.5%, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, treatment at MSH was associated with decreased likelihood of undergoing definitive surgery (odds ratio 0.91, P = 0.006). Of those who underwent surgical resection, multivariable survival analysis revealed that treatment at an MSH was associated with increased morality (hazard ratio 1.12, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated at MSH are less likely to undergo surgical resection compared to those treated at non-MSH. Targeted interventions are needed to address the unique barriers facing MSH facilities in providing care to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth J Olecki
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
| | - Rolfy A Perez Holguin
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Mackenzie M Mayhew
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - William G Wong
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles C Vining
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Program for Liver, Pancreas & Foregut Tumors, Division of Surgical Oncology, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - June S Peng
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Program for Liver, Pancreas & Foregut Tumors, Division of Surgical Oncology, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Chan Shen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew E B Dixon
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical College, Chicago, Illinois; Section of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Secemsky EA, Kirksey L, Quiroga E, King CM, Martinson M, Hasegawa JT, West NEJ, Wadhera RK. Impact of Intensity of Vascular Care Preceding Major Amputation Among Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 17:e012798. [PMID: 38152880 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.122.012798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower-limb amputation rates in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia vary across the United States, with marked disparities in amputation rates by gender, race, and income status. We evaluated the association of patient, hospital, and geographic characteristics with the intensity of vascular care received the year before a major lower-limb amputation and how intensity of care associates with outcomes after amputation. METHODS Using Medicare claims data (2016-2019), beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who underwent a major lower-limb amputation were identified. We examined patient, hospital, and geographic characteristics associated with the intensity of vascular care received the year before amputation. Secondary objectives evaluated all-cause mortality and adverse events following amputation. RESULTS Of 33 036 total Medicare beneficiaries undergoing major amputation, 7885 (23.9%) were due to chronic limb-threatening ischemia; of these, 4988 (63.3%) received low-intensity and 2897 (36.7%) received high-intensity vascular care. Mean age, 76.6 years; women, 38.9%; Black adults, 24.5%; and of low income, 35.2%. After multivariable adjustment, those of low income (odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58-0.72]; P<0.001), and to a lesser extent, men (odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98]; P=0.019), and those who received care at a safety-net hospital (odds ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78-0.97]; P=0.012) were most likely to receive low intensity of care before amputation. High-intensity care was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality 2 years following amputation (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74-0.85]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients who were of low-income status, and to a lesser extent, men, or those cared for at safety-net hospitals were most likely to receive low-intensity vascular care. Low-intensity care was associated with worse long-term event-free survival. These data emphasize the continued disparities that exist in contemporary vascular practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Secemsky
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., R.K.W.)
| | - Lee Kirksey
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, OH (L.K.)
| | - Elina Quiroga
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle (E.Q.)
| | - Claire M King
- Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA (C.M.K., J.T.H., N.E.J.W.)
| | | | | | - Nick E J West
- Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA (C.M.K., J.T.H., N.E.J.W.)
| | - Rishi K Wadhera
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.S., R.K.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zea-Vera R, Asokan S, Shah RM, Ryan CT, Chatterjee S, Wall MJ, Coselli JS, Rosengart TK, Kayani WT, Jneid H, Ghanta RK. Racial/ethnic differences persist in treatment choice and outcomes in isolated intervention for coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:1087-1096.e5. [PMID: 35248359 PMCID: PMC11092967 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Studies have noted racial/ethnic disparities in coronary artery disease intervention strategies. We investigated trends and outcomes of coronary artery disease treatment choice (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention) stratified by race/ethnicity. METHODS We queried the National Inpatient Sample for patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention (2002-2017). Outcomes were stratified by race/ethnicity (White, African American, Hispanic, Asian). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between race/ethnicity and receiving coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention, in-hospital mortality, and costs. RESULTS Over the 15-year period, 2,426,917 isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries and 7,184,515 percutaneous coronary interventions were performed. Compared with White patients, African American patients were younger (62 [interquartile range, 53-70] vs 66 [interquartile range, 57-75] years), were more likely to have Medicaid insurance (12.2% vs 4.4%), and had more comorbidities (Charlson-Deyo index, 1.9 ± 1.6 vs 1.7 ± 1.6) (all P < .01). After adjustment for patient comorbidities, presence of acute myocardial infarction, insurance status, and geography, African Americans were the least likely of all racial/ethnic groups to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (odds ratio, 0.76; P < .01), a consistent trend throughout the study. African American patients had higher risk-adjusted mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (odds ratio, 1.09; P < .01). Race/ethnicity was not associated with increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. African American patients had higher hospitalization costs for coronary artery bypass grafting (+$5816; P < .01) and percutaneous coronary intervention (+$856; P < .01) after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary national analysis, risk-adjusted frequency of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease differed by race/ethnicity. African American patients had lower odds of undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and worse outcomes. Reasons for these differences merit further investigation to identify opportunities to reduce potential disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Zea-Vera
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Sainath Asokan
- Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
| | - Rohan M Shah
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Christopher T Ryan
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Subhasis Chatterjee
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex
| | - Matthew J Wall
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Joseph S Coselli
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex
| | - Todd K Rosengart
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex
| | - Waleed T Kayani
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Hani Jneid
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Ravi K Ghanta
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lima HA, Alaimo L, Moazzam Z, Endo Y, Woldesenbet S, Katayama E, Munir MM, Shaikh C, Ruff SM, Dillhoff M, Beane J, Cloyd J, Ejaz A, Resende V, Pawlik TM. Disparities in NCCN Guideline-Compliant Care for Patients with Early-Stage Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at Minority-Serving versus Non-Minority-Serving Hospitals. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4363-4372. [PMID: 36800128 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13230-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial/ethnic disparities in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) outcomes may relate to receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-compliant care. We assessed the association between treatment at minority-serving hospitals (MSH) and receipt of NCCN-compliant care. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who underwent resection of early-stage PDAC between 2006 and 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). MSH was defined as the top decile of facilities treating minority ethnicities (Black and/or Hispanic). Factors associated with receipt of NCCN-compliant care and its impact on overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS Among 44,873 patients who underwent resection of PDAC, most were treated at non-MSH (n = 42,571, 94.9%), while a smaller subset were treated at MSH (n = 2302, 5.1%). Patients treated at MSH were more likely to be at a younger median age (MSH 66 years versus non-MSH 67 years), Black or Hispanic (MSH 58.4% versus non-MSH 12.0%), and not insured (MSH 7.8% versus non-MSH 1.6%). While 71.7% (n = 31,182) of patients were compliant with NCCN care, guideline-compliant care was lower at MSH (MSH 62.5% versus non-MSH 72.2%). On multivariable analysis, receiving care at MSH was associated with not receiving guideline-compliant care [odds ratio (OR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.74]. At non-MSH, non-white patients had lower odds of receiving guideline-compliant PDCA care (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.91). Failure to comply was associated with worse overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.50, 95% CI 1.46-1.54, all p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS Patients with PDAC treated at MSH and minorities treated at non-MSH were less likely to receive NCCN-compliant care. Failure to comply with guideline-based PDAC treatment was associated with worse OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrique A Lima
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zorays Moazzam
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Selamawit Woldesenbet
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Erryk Katayama
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Chanza Shaikh
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Samantha M Ruff
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joal Beane
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vivian Resende
- Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bowman CL, De Gorter R, Zaslow J, Fortier JH, Garber G. Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002264. [PMID: 37364940 PMCID: PMC10314656 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Never events (NEs) are patient safety incidents that are preventable and so serious they should never happen. To reduce NEs, several frameworks have been introduced over the past two decades; however, NEs and their harms continue to occur. These frameworks have varying events, terminology and preventability, which hinders collaboration. This systematic review aims to identify the most serious and preventable events for targeted improvement efforts by answering the following questions: Which patient safety events are most frequently classified as never events? Which ones are most commonly described as entirely preventable? METHODS For this narrative synthesis systematic review we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central and CINAHL for articles published from 1 January 2001 to 27 October 2021. We included papers of any study design or article type (excluding press releases/announcements) that listed NEs or an existing NE framework. RESULTS Our analyses included 367 reports identifying 125 unique NEs. Those most frequently reported were surgery on the wrong body part, wrong surgical procedure, unintentionally retained foreign objects and surgery on the wrong patient. Researchers classified 19.4% of NEs as 'wholly preventable'. Those most included in this category were surgery on the wrong body part or patient, wrong surgical procedure, improper administration of a potassium-containing solution and wrong-route administration of medication (excluding chemotherapy). CONCLUSIONS To improve collaboration and facilitate learning from errors, we need a single list that focuses on the most preventable and serious NEs. Our review shows that surgery on the wrong body part or patient, or the wrong surgical procedure best meet these criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara L Bowman
- Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ria De Gorter
- Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanna Zaslow
- Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacqueline H Fortier
- Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary Garber
- Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bercow AS, Rauh-Hain JA, Melamed A, Mazina V, Growdon WB, Del Carmen MG, Goodman A, Bouberhan S, Randall T, Sisodia R, Bregar A, Eisenhauer EL, Minami C, Molina G. Association of hospital-level factors with utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 169:47-54. [PMID: 36508758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for early-stage vulvar cancer at minority-serving hospitals and low-volume facilities. METHODS Between 2012-2018, individuals with T1b vulvar squamous cell carcinoma were identified using the National Cancer Database. Patient, facility, and disease characteristics were compared between patients undergoing SLNB or inguinofemoral lymph node dissection (IFLD). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient, facility, and disease characteristics, was used to evaluate factors associated with SLNB. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using log rank test and Cox regression was performed. RESULTS Of the 3,532 patients, 2,406 (68.1%) underwent lymph node evaluation, with 1,704 (48.2%) undergoing IFLD and 702 (19.8%) SLNB. In a multivariable analysis, treatment at minority-serving hospitals (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.78) and low-volume hospitals (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.70) were associated with significantly lower odds of undergoing SLNB compared to receiving care at non-minority-serving and high-volume hospitals, respectively. While SLNB utilization increased over time for the entire cohort and stratified subgroups, use of the procedure did not increase at minority-serving hospitals. After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, SLNB was not associated with worse OS compared to IFLD in patients with positive (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.63-1.66) or negative (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.21) nodal pathology. CONCLUSIONS For patients with early-stage vulvar cancer, treatment at minority-serving or low-volume hospitals was associated with significantly decreased odds of undergoing SLNB. Future efforts should be concentrated toward ensuring that all patients have access to advanced surgical techniques regardless of where they receive their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra S Bercow
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Varvara Mazina
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Whitfield B Growdon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Marcela G Del Carmen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Annekathryn Goodman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Sara Bouberhan
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Thomas Randall
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Rachel Sisodia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Amy Bregar
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Eric L Eisenhauer
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Christina Minami
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - George Molina
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mammen JR, McGovern CM, Schoonmaker JD, Philibert A, Schlegel EC, Arcoleo K. A multilevel perspective on goals, barriers, and facilitators of school-based asthma management. J Asthma 2022; 59:2461-2474. [PMID: 34962442 PMCID: PMC9239742 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2021.2018704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND School based asthma care is being increasingly used to combat uncontrolled pediatric asthma. OBJECTIVE The purpose of these secondary analyses was to explore multi-level perspectives regarding school-based asthma medical management for inner city, school-aged children with poor asthma control. METHODS Sixty-six participants from two large U.S. urban school districts and key stakeholders participated in 1:1 interviews and focus groups. Participants were selected from across the asthma care community (children/caregivers, school personnel, nurses, pharmacists, healthcare providers, and administrators/insurers). Qualitative and descriptive techniques were used to analyze data. RESULTS Goals: Children/caregivers prioritized living a normal active life with few asthma worries. Other stakeholders prioritized reducing student's asthma related emergency room visits and lost learning time. Facilitators: Continuity of care, strong relationships between care community members, and incentivizers were commonly suggested facilitators. School-based asthma management was viewed as a strong facilitator, particularly in the presence of a full-time school nurse. Barriers: Four themes were identified. (1) Greater systems and policy support for asthma management is needed in general, and at school in particular. (2) Overburdened families and systems often operate in crisis-mode, and asthma management is often not a priority until crisis is reached. (3) Discordance and distrust between members of the asthma care community can hinder shared asthma management. (4) Better communication is needed at all levels to improve care. CONCLUSION Moving away from a crisis-based approach to asthma management for high-risk children will require increased systemic support for proactive asthma care and optimized communication within the asthma care community. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2021.2018704.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ashley Philibert
- College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | | | - Kimberly Arcoleo
- College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vélez-Bermúdez M, Adamowicz JL, Askelson NM, Lutgendorf SK, Fraer M, Christensen AJ. Disparities in dialysis modality decision-making using a social-ecological lens: a qualitative approach. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:276. [PMID: 35931965 PMCID: PMC9356453 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02905-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) may choose to undergo dialysis in-center or at home, but uptake of home dialysis in the US has been minimal despite its benefits over in-center dialysis. Factors that may have led patients to select home dialysis over in-center dialysis are poorly understood in the literature, and interventions to improve selection of home dialysis have focused on patient knowledge and shared decision-making processes between patients and providers. The purpose of this study was to explore micro- and macro-level factors surrounding dialysis modality decision-making among patients undergoing in-center and home dialysis, and explore what leads patients to select home dialysis over in-center dialysis. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in a dialysis clinic at a large Midwestern research hospital, from September 2019 to December 2020. Participants were 18 years or older, undergoing dialysis for ESKD, and had the cognitive ability to provide consent. Surveys assessing demographic and clinical information were administered to participants following their interviews. RESULTS Forty patients completed interviews and surveys (20 [50%] in-center dialysis, 17 [43%] female, mean [SD] age, 59 [15.99] years). Qualitative findings suggested that healthcare access and engagement before entering nephrology care, after entering nephrology care, and following dialysis initiation influenced patients' awareness regarding their kidney disease status, progression toward ESKD, and dialysis options. Potential modifiers of these outcomes include race, ethnicity, and language barriers. Most participants adopted a passive-approach during decision-making. Finally, fatigue, concerns regarding one's dialyzing schedule, and problems with fistula/catheter access sites contributed to overall satisfaction with one's dialysis modality. CONCLUSIONS Findings point to broader factors affecting dialysis selection, including healthcare access and racial/ethnic inequities. Providing dialysis information before entering nephrology and after dialysis initiation may improve patient agency in decision-making. Additional resources should be prioritized for patients of underrepresented backgrounds. Dialysis decision-making may be appropriately modeled under the social-ecological framework to inform future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Vélez-Bermúdez
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Jenna L Adamowicz
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Natoshia M Askelson
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Susan K Lutgendorf
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mony Fraer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Alan J Christensen
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lam CM, Qureshi MM, Patel PN, Park JJ, Dang RR, Rubin SJ, Salama AR, Truong MT. Oral cancer patients achieve comparable survival at high safety-net burden hospitals. Am J Otolaryngol 2022; 43:103438. [PMID: 35489110 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of hospital safety-net burden and social demographics on the overall survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 48,176 oral cancer patients diagnosed between the years 2004 to 2015 from the National Cancer Database and categorized treatment facilities as no, low, or high safety-net burden hospitals based on the percentage of uninsured or Medicaid patients treated. Using the Kaplan Meier method and multivariate analysis, we examined the effect of hospital safety-net burden, sociodemographic variables, and clinical factors on overall survival. RESULTS Of the 1269 treatment facilities assessed, the median percentage of uninsured/Medicaid patients treated was 0% at no, 11.6% at low, and 23.5% at high safety-net burden hospitals and median survival was 68.6, 74.8, and 55.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). High safety-net burden hospitals treated more non-white populations (15.4%), lower median household income (<$30,000) (23.2%), and advanced stage cancers (AJCC III/IV) (54.6%). Patients treated at low (aHR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.91-1.04, p = 0.405) and high (aHR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.98-1.13, p = 0.175) safety-net burden hospitals did not experience worse survival outcomes compared to patients treated at no safety-net burden hospitals. CONCLUSION High safety-net burden hospitals treated more oral cancer patients of lower socioeconomic status and advanced disease. Multivariate analysis showed high safety-net burden hospitals achieved comparable patient survival to lower burden hospitals.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zheng M, Arora N, Chambers T, O'Dell K, Johns MM. Comparison of Treatment for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis at a Public County Versus Private Academic Hospital. J Voice 2022:S0892-1997(22)00018-2. [PMID: 35197218 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare patient, disease and treatment characteristics of patients treated for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) at a public county versus a private hospital. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adult patients undergoing treatment for RRP at a tertiary-care academic center (TAC, n = 48) versus public safety net hospital (PSNH, n = 14), both staffed by the same Otolaryngology providers. RESULTS There was no difference between cohorts in age, gender, medical comorbidities, history of juvenile-onset presentation, or history of prior treatment at a different institution. PSNH patients were more likely to be Hispanic/Latino, primarily speak Spanish, have public or no insurance, and reside in a zip code with lower median income compared with TAC patients. Despite living significantly closer to the hospital, PSNH patients were more likely than TAC patients to present with respiratory symptoms (50% versus 20.8%, P = 0.04), and exhibit more than one involved laryngeal subsite at their first surgical intervention (78.6% versus 27.1%, P = 0.001). They also had high rates of referral for otolaryngologic care via the emergency department (42.9%) rather than outpatient specialty referral (35.7%) and were more likely than TAC patients to require urgent intervention (21.4% versus 2.1%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in time interval from first clinic visit to procedure date or total number of treatments. CONCLUSIONS PSNH patients present with more severe and symptomatic RRP disease compared with TAC patients. This finding may be related to sociodemographic disparities leading to poorer access in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Zheng
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nikhil Arora
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tamara Chambers
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Karla O'Dell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael M Johns
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen J, Khazanchi R, Bearman G, Marcelin JR. Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Healthcare-associated Infections Under the Shadow of Structural Racism: Narrative Review and Call to Action. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2021; 23:17. [PMID: 34466126 PMCID: PMC8390539 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-021-00758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review The purpose of this study is to review racial and ethnic inequities in the incidence and prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in the USA, identify gaps in the literature, and recommend future directions to mitigate these inequities. Recent Findings While some existing literature has identified the presence of racial/ethnic inequities in HAI incidence and outcomes, few studies to date have evaluated whether HAI prevention efforts have mitigated these inequities. Factors contributing to inequities in HAI prevention may include unconscious bias of healthcare professionals towards minoritized patients; socioeconomic and structural inequities disparately affecting minoritized communities; the racial segregation of quality healthcare through hospital price discrimination; divergent reimbursement rates between public and private insurers; policies or performance metrics which underfund and financially penalize safety-net hospitals; and insufficient research evaluating and addressing HAI inequities. Summary Expansion of the literature is needed to further interrogate root causes and evaluate the impact of interventions on racial/ethnic inequities in HAI incidence. Measures to mitigate inequities might include teaching healthcare workers how to recognize and mitigate unconscious biases, expanding community resources which address the social and structural determinants of health, increasing access to preventive health services, reforming federal and institutional policies to better support safety-net hospitals and disincentivize price discrimination, and improving diversity and inclusion within the health workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiabi Chen
- School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA
| | - Rohan Khazanchi
- College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE USA.,School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | - Gonzalo Bearman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA
| | - Jasmine R Marcelin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Patient Social Vulnerability and Hospital Community Racial/Ethnic Integration: Do All Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy Receive the Same Care Across Hospitals? Ann Surg 2021; 274:508-515. [PMID: 34397453 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the current study was to characterize the role of patient social vulnerability relative to hospital racial/ethnic integration on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing pancreatectomy. BACKGROUND The interplay between patient- and community-level factors on outcomes after complex surgery has not been well-examined. METHODS Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a pancreatectomy between 2013 and 2017 were identified utilizing 100% Medicare inpatient files. P-SVI was determined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, whereas H-REI was estimated using Shannon Diversity Index. Impact of P-SVI and H-REI on "TO" [ie, no surgical complication/extended length-of-stay (LOS)/90-day mortality/90-day readmission] was assessed. RESULTS Among 24,500 beneficiaries who underwent pancreatectomy, 12,890 (52.6%) were male and median age was 72 years (Interquartile range: 68-77); 10,619 (43.3%) patients achieved a TO. The most common adverse postoperative outcome was 90-day readmission (n = 8,066, 32.9%), whereas the least common was 90-day mortality (n = 2282, 9.3%). Complications and extended LOS occurred in 30.4% (n = 7450) and 23.3% (n = 5699) of the cohort, respectively. Patients from an above average SVI county who underwent surgery at a below average REI hospital had 18% lower odds [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.95] of achieving a TO compared with patients from a below average SVI county who underwent surgery at a hospital with above average REI. Of note, patients from the highest SVI areas who underwent pancreatectomy at hospitals with the lowest REI had 30% lower odds (95% CI: 0.54-0.91) of achieving a TO compared with patients from very low SVI areas who underwent surgery at a hospital with high REI. Further comparisons of these 2 patient groups indicated 76% increased odds of 90-day mortality (95% CI: 1.10-2.82) and 50% increased odds of an extended LOS (95% CI: 1.07-2.11). CONCLUSION Patients with high social vulnerability who underwent pancreatectomy in hospitals located in communities with low racial/ethnic integration had the lowest chance to achieve an "optimal" TO. A focus on both patient- and community-level factors is needed to ensure optimal and equitable patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
14
|
Tsilimigras DI, Dalmacy D, Hyer JM, Diaz A, Abbas A, Pawlik TM. Disparities in NCCN Guideline Compliant Care for Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma at Minority-Serving Versus Non-Minority-Serving Hospitals. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8162-8171. [PMID: 34036428 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10202-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial/ethnic disparities in cancer outcomes may relate to variations in receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline compliant care. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients undergoing resection of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) between 2004 and 2015 were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Institutions treating Black and Hispanic patients within the top decile were categorized as minority-serving hospitals (MSH). Factors associated with receipt of NCCN-compliant care, and the impact of NCCN compliance on overall survival (OS), were evaluated. RESULTS Among 16,108 patients who underwent resection of CCA, the majority of patients were treated at non-MSH (n = 14,779, 91.8%), while a smaller subset underwent resection of CCA at MSH (n = 1329, 8.2%). Patients treated at MSH facilities tended to be younger (MSH: 65 years versus non-MSH: 67 years), Black or Hispanic (MSH: 59.9% versus non-MSH: 13.4%), and uninsured (MSH: 11.6% versus non-MSH: 2.2%). While overall compliance with NCCN care was 73.0% (n = 11,762), guideline-compliant care was less common at MSH (MSH: 68.8% versus non-MSH: 73.4%; p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, the odds of receiving non-NCCN compliant care remained lower at MSH (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88). While white patients had similar odds of NCCN-compliant care with minority patients when treated at MSH (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.75-1.28), minority patients had lower odds of receiving guideline-compliant care when treated at non-MSH (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.96). Failure to comply with NCCN guidelines was associated with worse long-term outcomes (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.52-1.69). CONCLUSIONS Patients treated at MSH had decreased odds to receive NCCN-compliant care following resection of CCA. Failure to comply with guideline-based cancer care was associated with worse long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Djhenne Dalmacy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - J Madison Hyer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adrian Diaz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alizeh Abbas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsilimigras DI, Pawlik TM. ASO Author Reflections: Minority-Serving Hospitals are Associated with Lower Likelihood of Providing NCCN Guideline Compliant Care to Patients with Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8172-8173. [PMID: 34018087 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10211-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Residential Racial Segregation and Disparities in Breast Cancer Presentation, Treatment, and Survival. Ann Surg 2021; 273:3-9. [PMID: 32889878 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand the role of racial residential segregation on Black-White disparities in breast cancer presentation, treatment, and outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Racial disparities in breast cancer treatment and outcomes are well documented. Black individuals present at advanced stage, are less likely to receive appropriate surgical and adjuvant treatment, and have lower overall and stage-specific survival relative to White individuals. METHODS Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, we performed a retrospective cohort study of Black and White patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2005 to 2015 within the 100 most populous participating counties. The racial index of dissimilarity was used as a validated measure of residential segregation. Multivariable regression was performed, predicting advanced stage at diagnosis (stage III/IV), surgery for localized disease (stage I/II), and overall stage-specific survival. RESULTS After adjusting for age at diagnosis, estrogen/progesterone receptor status, and region, Black patients have a 49% greater risk (relative risk [RR] 1.49 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 1.74) of presenting at advanced stage with increasing segregation, while there was no observed difference in Whites (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.93, 1.16). Black patients were 3% less likely to undergo surgical resection for localized disease (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 0.99) with increasing segregation, while Whites saw no significant difference. Black patients had a 29% increased hazard of death (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04, 1.60) with increasing segregation; there was no significant difference among White patients. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that residential racial segregation has a significant association with Black-White racial disparities in breast cancer. These findings illustrate the importance of addressing structural racism and residential segregation in efforts to reduce Black-White breast cancer disparities.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
It may seem unlikely that the field of radiology perpetuates disparities in health care, as most radiologists never interact directly with patients, and racial bias is not an obvious factor when interpreting images. However, a closer look reveals that imaging plays an important role in the propagation of disparities. For example, many advanced and resource-intensive imaging modalities, such as MRI and PET/CT, are generally less available in the hospitals frequented by people of color, and when they are available, access is impeded due to longer travel and wait times. Furthermore, their images may be of lower quality, and their interpretations may be more error prone. The aggregate effect of these imaging acquisition and interpretation disparities in conjunction with social factors is insufficiently recognized as part of the wide variation in disease outcomes seen between races in America. Understanding the nature of disparities in radiology is important to effectively deploy the resources and expertise necessary to mitigate disparities through diversity and inclusion efforts, research, and advocacy. In this article, the authors discuss disparities in access to imaging, examine their causes, and propose solutions aimed at addressing these disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Waite
- From the Department of Radiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11203 (S.W., J.M.S.); and Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (D.C.)
| | - Jinel Scott
- From the Department of Radiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11203 (S.W., J.M.S.); and Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (D.C.)
| | - Daria Colombo
- From the Department of Radiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11203 (S.W., J.M.S.); and Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hyer JM, Tsilimigras DI, Diaz A, Mirdad RS, Azap RA, Cloyd J, Dillhoff M, Ejaz A, Tsung A, Pawlik TM. High Social Vulnerability and "Textbook Outcomes" after Cancer Operation. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 232:351-359. [PMID: 33508426 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of community-level factors on surgical outcomes has not been well examined. We sought to characterize differences in "textbook outcomes" (TO) relative to social vulnerability among Medicare beneficiaries who underwent operations for cancer. METHODS Individuals who underwent operations for lung, esophageal, colon, or rectal cancer between 2013 and 2017 were identified using the Medicare database, which was merged with the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). TO was defined as surgical episodes with the absence of complications, extended length of stay, readmission, and mortality. The association of SVI and TO was assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS Among 203,800 patients (colon, n = 113,929; lung, n = 70,642; rectal, n = 14,849; and esophageal, n = 4,380), median age was 75 years (interquartile range 70 to 80 years) and the overwhelming majority of patients was White (n = 184,989 [90.8%]). The overall incidence of TO was 56.1% (n = 114,393). The incidence of complications (low SVI: 21.5% vs high SVI: 24.0%) and 90-day mortality (low SVI: 7.0% vs high SVI: 8.4%) were higher among patients from highly vulnerable neighborhoods (both, p < 0.05). In turn, there were lower odds of achieving TO among high-vs low-SVI patients (odds ratio 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.87). Although high-SVI White patients had 10% lower odds (95% CI, 0.87 to 0.93) of achieving TO, high-SVI non-White patients were at 22% lower odds (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.85) of postoperative TO. Compared with low-SVI White patients, high-SVI minority patients had 47% increased odds of an extended length of stay, 40% increased odds of a complication, and 23% increased odds of 90-day mortality (all, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Only roughly one-half of Medicare beneficiaries achieved the composite optimal TO quality metric. Social vulnerability was associated with lower attainment of TO and an increased risk of adverse postoperative surgical outcomes after several common oncologic procedures. The effect of high SVI was most pronounced among minority patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Madison Hyer
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Adrian Diaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Rosevine A Azap
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Jordan Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Allan Tsung
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen H. EDITORIAL: Featured papers in the September Issue. Am J Surg 2020; 220:508. [PMID: 32892910 PMCID: PMC7471927 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
20
|
Chertack N, Ghandour RA, Singla N, Freifeld Y, Hutchinson RC, Courtney K, Bowman IA, Arafat W, Meng X, Moore JA, Aydin AM, Sagalowsky AI, Margulis V, Lotan Y, Woldu SL, Bagrodia A. Overcoming sociodemographic factors in the care of patients with testicular cancer at a safety net hospital. Cancer 2020; 126:4362-4370. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Chertack
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Rashed A. Ghandour
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Yuval Freifeld
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Ryan C. Hutchinson
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Kevin Courtney
- Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - I. Alex Bowman
- Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Waddah Arafat
- Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Joseph A. Moore
- Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Ahmet M. Aydin
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Arthur I. Sagalowsky
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Solomon L. Woldu
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bonner S, Dossett LA. Improving the delivery of surgical care at high burden safety-net hospitals. Am J Surg 2020; 220:524. [PMID: 32451066 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sidra Bonner
- Department of Surgery and the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery and the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, USA.
| |
Collapse
|