1
|
Ghiordanescu IM, Ciocănea-Teodorescu I, Molinari N, Jelen A, Al-Ali O, Schrijvers R, Demoly P, Chiriac AM. Comparative Performance of 4 Penicillin-Allergy Prediction Strategies in a Large Cohort. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024:S2213-2198(24)00743-8. [PMID: 39038539 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A safe and pragmatic guide for labelling and delabelling patients with suspected penicillin allergy is mandatory. OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of 4 penicillin-allergy prediction strategies in a large independent cohort. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study for subjects presenting between January 2014 and December 2021 at the University Hospital of Montpellier, with a history of hypersensitivity to penicillins. The outcome targeted by the study was a positive penicillin-allergy test. RESULTS Of the 1,884 participants included, 382 (20.3%) had positive penicillin-allergy tests. The ENDA (European Network on Drug Allergy) and Blumenthal strategies yielded relatively high sensitivities and low specificities and, by design, did not misclassify any positive subjects with severe index reactions. The PEN-FAST <3 score had a negative predictive value of 90% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 88%-91%), with a sensitivity of 66% (95% CI 62%-71%) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI 71%-75%), and incorrectly delabelled 18 subjects with anaphylaxis and 15 with other severe nonimmediate reactions. For the adapted Chiriac score, the specificity corresponding to 66% sensitivity was 73% (95% CI 70%-75%). Conversely, at a 73% specificity threshold, the sensitivity was 65% (95% CI, 61%-70%). Attempts to improve these prediction algorithms did not substantially enhance performance. CONCLUSIONS The ENDA and Blumenthal strategies are safe for high-risk subjects, but their delabelling effectiveness is limited, leading to unnecessary avoidance. Conversely, the PEN-FAST and Chiriac scores are performant in delabelling, but more frequently misclassify high-risk subjects with positive penicillin-allergy tests. Selection of the most appropriate tool requires careful consideration of the target population and the desired goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ileana-Maria Ghiordanescu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania; IDESP (The Desbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health), University of Montpellier-INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Montpellier, France.
| | - Iuliana Ciocănea-Teodorescu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania; Victor Babeș National Institute of Pathology, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolas Molinari
- IDESP (The Desbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health), University of Montpellier-INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Montpellier, France; Division of Medical Information, La Colombiere University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpelier, France
| | - Anais Jelen
- Department of Pulmonology, Division of Allergy, Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Omar Al-Ali
- Department of Pulmonology, Division of Allergy, Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Transversal Unit of Allergology, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Rik Schrijvers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Demoly
- IDESP (The Desbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health), University of Montpellier-INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Montpellier, France; Department of Pulmonology, Division of Allergy, Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Anca Mirela Chiriac
- IDESP (The Desbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health), University of Montpellier-INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Montpellier, France; Department of Pulmonology, Division of Allergy, Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stul F, Heytens S, Ebo DG, Sabato V, Piessens V. Safe Penicillin Allergy Delabeling in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024:S2213-2198(24)00640-8. [PMID: 38901618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ten percent of the population is labeled as allergic to penicillin(s), when in fact 90% of these labels are inappropriate. Recent studies have shown that inpatient delabeling by a direct drug challenge (dDC) is safe in low-risk patients. However, there is a need for outpatient and nonallergist delabeling. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety of delabeling low-risk adults by means of dDC in primary care. METHODS We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 15, 2022 (updated June 5, 2023) for studies performing dDC in adults in primary care or other outpatient settings. Two researchers independently screened studies for eligibility. The data extraction and critical appraisal were performed by 1 reviewer, and we pooled the results in a meta-analysis. RESULTS Of 2138 results, 12 studies (1070 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies evaluated delabeling in primary care and 9 studies in an outpatient hospital setting. There were no critical adverse events during dDC. No reaction occurred in 97.13% of the 1070 patients, who previously labeled as penicillin-allergic, and were safely delabeled. Ten patients (<1%) developed an immediate reaction: 3 had self-limiting reactions and 7 needed antihistaminics, steroids, epinephrine, and/or salbutamol. CONCLUSIONS No serious allergic reactions are observed during direct amoxicillin challenge in adults in an outpatient setting. However, with the exception of 1 recent report, these studies are of low to moderate quality. Nonspecialist delabeling is promising, but further research is required on correct risk stratification and safety assessment in large cohort studies evaluating dDC in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Stul
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Stefan Heytens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Didier Gaston Ebo
- Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vito Sabato
- Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Veerle Piessens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alvsåker LKT, Stensen MF, Mjelle AB, Hunskaar S, Rebnord IK. Outcomes of antibiotic treatment for respiratory infections in children an observational study in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:237-245. [PMID: 38265029 PMCID: PMC11003315 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2305929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic resistance is an increasing global threat, accelerated by both misuse and overuse of antibiotics. Most antibiotics to humans are prescribed in primary care, commonly for respiratory symptoms, and there is a need for research on the usage of and outcomes after antibiotic treatment to counteract antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVE To evaluate symptom duration, treatment length, and adverse events of antibiotic treatment in children. DESIGN AND SETTING Observational study at four out-of-hours services and one paediatric emergency clinic in Norwegian emergency primary care. SUBJECTS 266 children aged 0 to 6 years with fever or respiratory symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Duration of symptoms and absenteeism from kindergarten/school, treatment length, and reported adverse events. RESULTS There were no differences in duration of symptoms, fever or absenteeism when comparing the groups prescribed (30.8%) and not prescribed (69.2%) antibiotics. This lack of difference remained when analysing the subgroup with otitis media.In the group prescribed antibiotics, 84.5% of parents reported giving antibiotics for 5-7 days, and 50.7% reported no difficulties. Adverse events of antibiotics were reported in 42.3% of the cases, the vast majority being gastrointestinal disturbances. CONCLUSION Children with fever or respiratory symptoms experience similar duration of symptoms and absenteeism regardless of antibiotic treatment. A substantial number of parents reported adverse events when the child received antibiotics. Several parents experienced additional difficulties with the treatment, some ending treatment within day 4. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02496559; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anders Batman Mjelle
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Steinar Hunskaar
- National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ingrid Keilegavlen Rebnord
- National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carter EJ, Zavez K, Rogers SC, deMayo R, Harel O, Gerber JS, Aseltine RH. Documented Penicillin Allergies on Antibiotic Selection at Pediatric Emergency Department Visits. Pediatr Emerg Care 2024; 40:283-288. [PMID: 37549307 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000003023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penicillin or amoxicillin are the recommended treatments for the most common pediatric bacterial illnesses. Allergies to penicillin are commonly reported among children but rarely true. We evaluated the impact of reported penicillin allergies on broad-spectrum antibiotic use overall and for the treatment of common respiratory infections among treat-and-release pediatric emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients receiving antibiotics during a treat-and-release visit at a large, pediatric ED in the northeast from 2014 to 2016. Study exposure was a reported allergy to penicillin in the electronic medical record. Study outcomes were the selection of broad-spectrum antibiotics and alternative (second-line) antibiotic therapy for the treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) and group A streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis. We used unadjusted and adjusted generalized estimating equation models to analyze the impact of reported penicillin allergies on the selection of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We used unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models to determine the probability of children with a documented penicillin allergy receiving alternative antibiotic treatments for AOM and GAS. RESULTS Among 12,987 pediatric patients, 810 (6.2%) had a documented penicillin allergy. Penicillin allergies increased the odds of children receiving a broad spectrum versus narrow spectrum antibiotic (adjusted odds ratio, 13.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.34-16.18). In our adjusted logistic regression model, the probability of children with a documented penicillin allergy receiving alternative antibiotic treatment for AOM was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and for GAS was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). CONCLUSIONS Antibiotic stewardship efforts in pediatric EDs may consider the delabeling of penicillin allergies particularly among children receiving antibiotics for an acute respiratory infection as a target for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen J Carter
- From the University of Connecticut School of Nursing, Storrs, CT
| | - Katherine Zavez
- University of Connecticut Department of Statistics, Storrs, CT
| | - Steven C Rogers
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Connecticut Children's, Hartford, CT
| | - Richelle deMayo
- Department of Informatics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT
| | - Ofer Harel
- University of Connecticut Department of Statistics, Storrs, CT
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Olans RN, Olans RD. Linking the Who, What, When, and Where of Inpatient Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge With the How of Durable Penicillin Allergy Delabeling. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:227. [PMID: 37585654 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard N Olans
- Tufts Medicine, Melrose-Wakefield Hospital, Melrose, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
He K, Dawson M, Stroh C, Taylor KM, Quigley S, Jones S, Cramm SL, Rangel SJ. A Process Improvement Project to Increase Compliance With Cephalosporin-based Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Children With Non-severe Penicillin Allergies. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59:61-67. [PMID: 37839950 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Cephalosporins are considered safe and first-line prophylaxis in children with non-severe penicillin allergies. However, use of second-line agents is common and is primarily driven by poor allergic response documentation and misunderstanding of cross-reactivity risk. The goal of this project was to improve compliance with cephalosporin prophylaxis through improved documentation and targeted educational efforts. METHODS A multidisciplinary working group including representatives from allergy, surgery, infectious disease, and pharmacy developed staged interventions to facilitate compliance with cephalosporin prophylaxis. These included: (1) caregiver outreach to clarify incomplete allergy documentation, (2) a decision-support algorithm for prophylaxis use in penicillin-allergic patients, (3) standardized educational resources for surgical faculty and rotating trainees, (4) email reminders with prophylaxis recommendations sent out prior to scheduled cases, and (5) EMR-based decision support during antibiotic ordering. Rates of complete allergy documentation and cephalosporin utilization were compared for general surgery procedures between a 12-month pre-intervention and 14-month post-intervention period. RESULTS 578 patients with penicillin allergies recorded in the EMR were included (301 pre-intervention and 277 post-intervention), 54.0% of which received prophylaxis. Compared to the pre-intervention period, complete documentation of allergic reactions increased from 57.1% to 84.2% (p < 0.001) following implementation of all interventions. Appropriate prophylaxis utilization increased from 34.5% to 88.5% following implementation of all interventions (p < 0.001), and evidence of a stepwise increase in appropriate utilization was evident with each intervention stage. Persistent compliance failures during the post-implementation period were most commonly associated with urgent and emergent add-on cases. No adverse events or allergic responses were reported before or after project implementation. CONCLUSIONS Compliance with cephalosporin prophylaxis significantly improved following a multidisciplinary effort targeting education, allergy documentation, and clinical support at the point of care. Ongoing efforts include postoperative audits within 24 h for noncompliant cases in order to identify barriers and improve compliance for urgent and emergent add-on cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III. TYPE OF STUDY Prospective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine He
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michele Dawson
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Crystal Stroh
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristina M Taylor
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Quigley
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Jones
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shannon L Cramm
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shawn J Rangel
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sáenz de Santa María R, Bogas G, Labella M, Ariza A, Salas M, Doña I, Torres MJ. Approach for delabeling beta-lactam allergy in children. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2023; 4:1298335. [PMID: 38033918 PMCID: PMC10684789 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1298335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
A considerable number of pediatric patients treated with beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics develop delayed onset of skin rashes during the course of treatment. Although the most frequent cause of these symptoms is infectious, many cases are labeled as allergic reactions to these drugs. BL allergy labels could have a negative impact, as they imply avoidance of this group of drugs and the use of second-line antibiotics, leading to a potential increase in adverse effects and the utilization of less effective therapies. This constitutes a major public health concern and economic burden, as the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics can result in multidrug-resistant organisms and prolonged hospital stays. Therefore, it is crucial to delabel patients during childhood to avoid false labeling in adult life. Although the label of BL allergy is among the most frequent causes of allergy referral, its management remains controversial, and new diagnostic perspectives are changing the paradigm of managing BL allergies in children. Traditionally, drug provocation testing (DPT) was exclusively performed in patients who had previously obtained negative results from skin tests (STs). However, the sensitivity of STs is low, and the role of in vitro testing in the pediatric population is not well defined. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety of direct DPT without prior ST or serum tests for pediatric patients who report a low-risk reaction to BLs, which is cost-effective. However, there is still a debate on the optimal allergic workup to be performed in children with a benign immediate reaction and the management of children with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. In this review, we will discuss the impact of the label of BL allergy and the role of the different tools currently available to efficiently address BL allergy delabeling in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Sáenz de Santa María
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - G. Bogas
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - M. Labella
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - A. Ariza
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - M. Salas
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - I. Doña
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
| | - M. J. Torres
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain
- Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, Málaga, Spain
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Facultad de Medicina, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pickett G, Gupta M, Anagnostou A. Delabeling antibiotic allergy: real-world experience from a pediatric cohort. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2023; 131:530-531. [PMID: 37399903 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Grant Pickett
- Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| | - Meera Gupta
- Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hampton LL, DeBoy JT, Gunaratne A, Stallings AP, Bell T, Phillips MA, Kamath SS, Sterrett EC, Nazareth-Pidgeon KM. Improving the Documentation of Penicillin Allergy Labels Among Pediatric Inpatients. Hosp Pediatr 2023; 13:811-821. [PMID: 37565275 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Penicillin allergy is the most common medication allergy, and the penicillin allergy label is commonly over-applied without adequate reaction history inquiry or documentation. Because penicillin allergy labels are often applied in childhood and carried into adulthood, we sought to increase the completeness of reaction history documentation from 20% to 70% for pediatric hospital medicine patients and from 20% to 50% for all other pediatric inpatients within 12 months. As a secondary outcome, we also aimed to increase the proportion of delabeling unnecessary penicillin labels to 20% for all pediatric inpatients. METHODS To address our aims, our quality improvement initiative included education for pediatric faculty and staff, development and implementation of a clinical pathway for allergy risk stratification, and electronic health record optimizations. Statistical process control charts were used to track the impact of the interventions facilitated by an automated dashboard. RESULTS Within 12 months of interventions, the completeness of allergy labels improved from 20% to 64% among patients admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service and improved from 20% to 45% for all other pediatric inpatients. The frequency of penicillin allergy delabeling remained unchanged; however, 98 patients were risk stratified and 34 received outpatient allergy referrals for further testing. The number of adverse drug reactions to penicillin, a balancing measure, did not change during the study period. CONCLUSIONS We increased the completeness of penicillin allergy documentation using a standardized workflow facilitated by a multidisciplinary clinical pathway. With ongoing efforts, more penicillin delabeling in low-risk patients is anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura L Hampton
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wilkerson RG. Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2023; 43:473-489. [PMID: 37394254 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions are a diverse group of reactions mediated by the immune system after exposure to a drug. The Gell and Coombs classification divides immunologic DHRs into 4 major pathophysiologic categories based on immunologic mechanism. Anaphylaxis is a Type I hypersensitivity reaction that requires immediate recognition and treatment. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are a group of dermatologic diseases that result from a Type IV hypersensitivity process and include drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS) syndrome, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Other types of reactions are slow to develop and do not always require rapid treatment. Emergency physicians should have a good understanding of these various types of drug hypersensitivity reactions and how to approach the patient regarding evaluation and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Gentry Wilkerson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Samarakoon U, Accarino J, Wurcel AG, Jaggers J, Judd A, Blumenthal KG. Penicillin allergy delabeling: Opportunities for implementation and dissemination. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2023; 130:554-564. [PMID: 36563744 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Although existing as a safety measure to prevent iatrogenic harm, unconfirmed penicillin allergy labels have a negative impact on personal and public health. One downstream effect of unconfirmed penicillin allergy is the continued emergence and transmission of resistant bacteria and their associated health care costs. Recognizing the consequences of inaccurate penicillin allergy labels, professional and public health organizations have started promoting the adoption of proactive penicillin allergy evaluations, with the ultimate goal of removing the penicillin allergy label when the allergy is disproved, also known as penicillin allergy "delabeling." A penicillin allergy evaluation includes a comprehensive allergy history often followed by drug challenge, sometimes with preceding skin testing. Currently, penicillin allergy delabeling is largely carried out by allergy specialists in outpatient settings. Penicillin allergy delabeling is performed on inpatients, albeit rarely, often at the time of need, as a point-of-care procedure. Access to penicillin allergy evaluation services is limited. Recent studies demonstrate the feasibility of expanding penicillin allergy evaluations and delabeling to internists, pediatricians, emergency medicine physicians, infectious diseases specialists, and clinical pharmacists. However, reducing the impact of mislabeled penicillin allergy will require comprehensive efforts and new investments. In this review, we summarize the current practices of penicillin allergy delabeling and discuss expansion opportunities for penicillin allergy delabeling as quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Upeka Samarakoon
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John Accarino
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alysse G Wurcel
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jordon Jaggers
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Allen Judd
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimberly G Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wrynn AF. An overview of penicillin allergies for nurses. Nursing 2023; 53:27-31. [PMID: 37074275 DOI: 10.1097/01.nurse.0000923664.66265.a4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Antibiotics are frequently reported as allergies by patients, particularly antibiotics from the penicillin family. Most of these reported allergies are benign, and the consequences of alternative therapies can be significant. This article provides background information on penicillin allergies and serves as a guide to penicillin allergy management.Reprinted with permission from Wrynn, A.F. An overview of penicillin allergies for nurses. Nurse Pract 2022; 47(9): 30-36. Copyright Wolters Kluwer. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander F Wrynn
- Alexander F. Wrynn is an infectious diseases nurse practitioner at Allegheny Health Network in Pittsburgh, Pa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Antoon JW, Grijalva CG, Carroll AR, Johnson J, Stassun J, Bonnet K, Schlundt DG, Williams DJ. Parental Perceptions of Penicillin Allergy Risk Stratification and Delabeling. Hosp Pediatr 2023; 13:300-308. [PMID: 36919441 PMCID: PMC10071421 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penicillin (PCN) allergy labels are widely recognized to be highly inaccurate. Little is known about parental perceptions of the PCN allergy evaluation and removal process, especially in the hospital setting. METHODS Focus groups were held with parents of children and adolescents with a PCN allergy label discharged from a large academic children's hospital between January 1, 2019, and April 15, 2020. The open-ended, semistructured moderator guide included questions about PCN allergy testing and evaluation, accuracy of the PCN allergy diagnosis, amoxicillin oral challenges, delabeling process, and preferred setting for PCN allergy delabeling evaluation (outpatient clinic, hospital, etc). Study investigators coded the transcripts and identified underlying themes using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 21 parents and 2 adolescents participated across 4 focus groups. We developed a theoretical framework depicting key elements of parents' and adolescents' experiences with PCN allergies, consisting of 4 major interconnected themes: (1) family context; (2) the invitation to delabel; (3) decision context; and (4) the PCN delabeling outcome. PCN allergies remained a concern for families even if their children passed an oral challenge. Some parents preferred testing to be performed in the hospital and felt this was a safer location for the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Parents are amenable to hospital based PCN allergy evaluation and delabeling. Further studies should incorporate parental and patient preferences to implement safe and effective PCN allergy delabeling processes in the hospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W. Antoon
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Carlos G. Grijalva
- Departments of Health Policy and Bioinformatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alison R. Carroll
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jakobi Johnson
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Justine Stassun
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kemberlee Bonnet
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David G. Schlundt
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Derek J. Williams
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Taylor MG, Joerger T, Anvari S, Li Y, Gerber JS, Palazzi DL. The Quality and Management of Penicillin Allergy Labels in Pediatric Primary Care. Pediatrics 2023; 151:e2022059309. [PMID: 36740967 PMCID: PMC10680064 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-059309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Penicillin allergy labels are the most common drug allergy label. The objective of this study was to describe the quality and management of penicillin allergy labels in the pediatric primary care setting. METHODS Retrospective chart review of 500 of 18 015 children with penicillin allergy labels born from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2020 randomly selected from an outpatient birth cohort from Texas Children's Pediatrics and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia networks. Penicillin allergy risk classification ("not allergy," "low risk," "moderate or high risk," "severe risk," "unable to classify") was determined based on documentation within (1) the allergy tab and (2) electronic healthcare notes. Outcomes of allergy referrals and penicillin re-exposure were noted. RESULTS Half of penicillin allergy labels were "unable to classify" based on allergy tab documentation. Risk classification agreement between allergy tabs and healthcare notes was fair (Cohen's ĸ = 0.35 ± 0.02). Primary care physicians referred 84 of 500 (16.8%) children to an allergist, but only 54 (10.8%) were seen in allergy clinic. All children who were challenged (25 of 25) passed skin testing. Removal of allergy labels was uncommon (69 of 500, 13.8%) but occurred more often following allergy appointments (26 of 54, 48%) than not (43 of 446, 9.6%, P < .001). Children delabeled by primary care physicians were as likely to tolerate subsequent penicillin-class antibiotics as those delabeled by an allergist (94% vs 93%, P = .87). CONCLUSIONS Penicillin allergy documentation within the allergy tab was uninformative, and children were infrequently referred to allergists. Future quality improvement studies should improve penicillin allergy documentation and expand access to allergy services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret G Taylor
- Division of Infectious Diseases
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Torsten Joerger
- Division of Infectious Diseases
- Division of Immunology, Allergy, and Retrovirology
| | - Sara Anvari
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Division of Immunology, Allergy, and Retrovirology
| | - Yun Li
- Division of Immunology, Allergy, and Retrovirology
- Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics
| | - Jeffrey S Gerber
- Division of Infectious Diseases
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Debra L Palazzi
- Division of Infectious Diseases
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chow TG, Patel G, Mohammed M, Johnson D, Khan DA. Delabeling penicillin allergy in a pediatric primary care clinic. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2023; 130:667-669. [PMID: 36738783 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy G Chow
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| | - Gaytri Patel
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | | | - David A Khan
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Arasaratnam RJ, Chow TG, Liu AY, Khan DA, Blumenthal KG, Wurcel AG. Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Health Equity: A Call to Action. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:422-428. [PMID: 36521831 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Allergists have been at the forefront of addressing the burden of unverified penicillin allergy labels. Coordinated national efforts with infectious diseases, antimicrobial stewardship experts, and pharmacy societies to advocate for formal evaluation of patient-reported penicillin allergy have resulted in improvements in delabeling efforts. Given the poorer health outcomes associated with the penicillin allergy label and the potential health benefits that can be gained with delabeling, improving access to penicillin allergy evaluation is of the utmost importance. Health disparities are widely recognized to impact all aspects of health care, and multilevel interventions at the patient, clinician, and systems level are required to ensure equitable care delivery. Structural racism underpins many social determinants of health and is a key driver of racial and ethnic health disparities. In this Rostrum, we use a conceptual framework from the 2015 National Academy of Medicine report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care to explore how inequities are related to the evaluation of penicillin allergy. We use the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Strategies to Advance Health Disparities to elucidate areas of important study. Building upon existing efforts to address disparities in Allergy/Immunology, we highlight the urgent importance of understanding and eliminating health disparities in penicillin allergy evaluation and delabeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben J Arasaratnam
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas.
| | - Timothy G Chow
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Anne Y Liu
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, and Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - David A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kimberly G Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Alysse G Wurcel
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Mass; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Documented Penicillin Allergies Should Not Preclude Use of Preoperative Cefazolin in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:e107-e117. [PMID: 36580056 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Perioperative cefazolin administration for total joint arthroplasty is a first-line antibiotic recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines for the prevention of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). We aim to analyze the clinical viability of giving patients with a documented penicillin allergy (PA) a perioperative full-strength cefazolin "test dose" under anesthesia. METHODS This is a retrospective chart review of 2,451 total joint arthroplasties from a high-volume arthroplasty orthopaedic surgeon over a 5-year period from January 2013 through December 2017. This surgeon routinely gave patients with a documented PA a full-strength cefazolin test dose while under anesthesia instead of administrating a second-line antibiotic. The primary outcomes examined were allergic reaction and postoperative infection. RESULTS Cefazolin was given to 87.1% of all patients (1,990) and 46.0% of patients with a PA (143). The total rate of allergic reactions among all patients was 0.5% (11). Only one patient with a documented PA who received cefazolin had an allergic reaction. The reaction was not severe and did not require any additional treatment. In patients who had no reported allergies and received cefazolin, 0.3% (6) had an allergic reaction. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of allergic reaction when comparing patients with and without a PA (P = 0.95). Patients receiving cefazolin had an overall PJI rate of 2.9% (57) versus those patients receiving antibiotics other than cefazolin who sustained a 5.5% PJI rate (16), which was statistically significant (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION This study found that utilization of a full-strength test dose of cefazolin in patients with a documented PA is a feasible, safe, and effective way of increasing the rate of cefazolin administration and thus mitigating the risk of PJIs.
Collapse
|
18
|
Maduemem K, Clark H, Sohal I, Dawson T, Makwana N. Barriers to paediatric penicillin allergy de-labelling in UK secondary care: a regional survey. Arch Dis Child 2022; 108:363-366. [PMID: 36535750 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incorrect penicillin allergy labels result in the use of inappropriately broad-spectrum antibiotics. De-labelling inaccurate penicillin allergy promotes antimicrobial stewardship and optimises prescribing practices. The objectives were to evaluate paediatric clinicians' knowledge and understanding of penicillin allergy and to identify barriers in tackling incorrect penicillin allergy labels. METHODS Paediatric clinicians from across the West Midlands of the UK were surveyed using an online, anonymised questionnaire between 1 August and 30 September 2021. Domains explored were (1) approach to penicillin allergy clinical vignettes, (2) knowledge of the impact of penicillin allergy labels, (3) frequency of allergy-focused history questions and (4) barriers in tackling incorrect penicillin allergy. RESULTS Responses were received from 307 paediatric clinicians across 12 hospitals. Sixty-one per cent would not prescribe a penicillin-based antibiotic if a family history of penicillin allergy was reported. There was an overall deficit in taking an allergy-focused history with only 36.5% inquiring about diagnostic confirmation. Absence, or lack of awareness of a referral pathway for antibiotic allergy evaluation (58.6%) and unfamiliarity of the indications for oral provocation testing (55%) were the most common reported barriers to penicillin allergy de-labelling. Fifty-one per cent would rather 'play it safe' than explore penicillin allergy confirmation as it is felt that alternative treatments were readily available. CONCLUSIONS The deficiency in antibiotic allergy-focused history among paediatric clinicians highlights the need for better allergy education across all clinical grades. Pragmatic algorithms and clear referral pathways could address barriers faced by non-allergists in de-labelling incorrect penicillin allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kene Maduemem
- Emergency department, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hannah Clark
- Paediatrics, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK
| | - Iseult Sohal
- Paediatrics, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Tom Dawson
- Paediatrics, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK
| | - Niten Makwana
- Department of Paediatrics, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Advances in immunoglobulin E mediated antibiotic allergy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2022; 34:609-615. [PMID: 36036421 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to identify recent advances in our understanding and management of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated antibiotic allergy. RECENT FINDINGS Antibiotics remain a leading cause of fatal anaphylaxis reported to the FDA. However, recent advances have defined the features of adult and pediatric patients without true IgE-mediated allergy or any mechanism of anaphylaxis when tested. This has created opportunities to use direct challenges to disprove these allergies at the point-of-care and improves antibiotic stewardship. Additional advances have highlighted cross-reactive structural considerations within classes of drugs, in particular the R1 side-chain of cephalosporins, that appear to drive true immune-mediated cross-reactivity. Further advances in risk-based approaches to skin testing, phenotyping, and re-exposure challenges are needed to standardize antibiotic allergy evaluation. SUMMARY Recent advances in defining true IgE-mediated drug allergy have helped to identify patients unlikely to be skin-test positive. In turn, this has identified patients who can skip skin testing and proceed to direct ingestion challenge using history risk-based approaches. The ability to identify the small number of patients with true IgE-mediated allergy and study their natural history over time, as well as the vast majority without true allergy will facilitate important and novel mechanistic discoveries.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cohen HA, Gerstein M, Loewenberg Weisband Y, Richenberg Y, Jacobson E, Cohen M, Shkalim Zemer V, Machnes MD. Pediatric Antibiotic Stewardship for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Pre-Post Intervention Study. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2022; 61:795-801. [PMID: 35673872 DOI: 10.1177/00099228221102827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) on antibiotic prescription in children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Antibiotic purchasing data were collected for children aged 3 months to 18 years diagnosed with CAP from November 2016 to April 2017 (pre-intervention period) and from November 2017 to April 2018 (post-intervention period). The intervention was a 1-day seminar for primary care pediatricians on the diagnosis and treatment of CAP in children according to national guidelines. There was a substantial decrease in the use of azithromycin after the intervention. In younger children, there was a 42% decrease, alongside an increased use of amoxicillin (P < .001). In older children, there was a smaller, non-statistically significant decrease in the use of azithromycin (P = .45). Our data demonstrate that the implementation of an ASP was associated with a reduction in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and macrolides and increased guideline adherence for the safe treatment of CAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herman Avner Cohen
- Pediatric Ambulatory Community Clinic, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Maya Gerstein
- Pediatric Ambulatory Community Clinic, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Eyal Jacobson
- Clalit Health Services, Dan-Petach Tikva District, Israel
| | | | - Vered Shkalim Zemer
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Clalit Health Services, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Maayan Diti Machnes
- Pediatric Ambulatory Community Clinic, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Guarnieri KM, Xie SS, Courter JD, Liu C, Ruddy RM, Risma KA. Distinct Characteristics and Chronology of Amoxicillin-Associated Reactions in Pediatric Acute Care Settings. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:2951-2957.e3. [PMID: 35872212 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amoxicillin-associated reactions (AARs) in children presenting as rashes are common, and recent data suggest that >90% tolerate amoxicillin on re-exposure. However, additional data would help pediatricians and allergists gain confidence in referring and testing children who experienced systemic symptoms perceived as "worrisome," thus leading to urgent medical evaluations. By characterizing the entire spectrum of AAR symptoms in pediatric patients presenting to emergency department (ED)/urgent care (UC) settings, we sought to increase our diagnostic acumen to guide subsequent allergy evaluations. OBJECTIVE To fully characterize clinical features of rash and systemic symptoms in children presenting to the ED/UC with AARs. METHODS A retrospective chart review of children seen in the ED/UC from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017, was conducted. Clinical features, chronology, and seasonality were detailed, and cases were classified into 3 previously described AAR phenotypes: maculopapular exanthem (MPE), urticaria, and serum sickness-like reactions (SSLRs), if they experienced joint symptoms. RESULTS Children (n = 668; median age: 1.8 years) presented to the ED/UC with urticaria (44%), MPE (36%), and SSLRs (11%) typically on days 7 to 10 of amoxicillin. Although children with SSLRs were more frequently treated with corticosteroids (28%, P < .0001) and exhibited higher rates of "worrisome" features (fever, angioedema, or gastrointestinal symptoms; 73%, P < .0001), delayed-onset systemic symptoms were identified frequently in all 3 groups. ED/UC reutilization was unexpectedly high with 66 children (10%) returning to the ED/UC for re-evaluation. CONCLUSION "Worrisome" symptoms are common in children presenting to the ED/UC with AARs. Future studies are needed to determine the impact on subsequent referral and allergy testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine M Guarnieri
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Susan S Xie
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Joshua D Courter
- Division of Pharmacy, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Chunyan Liu
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Richard M Ruddy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kimberly A Risma
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Penicillin allergies: A guide for NPs. Nurse Pract 2022; 47:30-36. [PMID: 36006817 DOI: 10.1097/01.npr.0000855312.11145.78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Antibiotics are frequently reported as allergies by patients, particularly antibiotics from the penicillin family. Most of these reported allergies are benign, and the consequences of alternative therapies can be significant. This article will deliver background information on penicillin allergies and serve as a guide to penicillin allergy management.
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang D, Han J, Pan C, Li C, Zhao Y, Liu S, Zhang Y, Tian J, Yi Y, Zhu J, Liu C, Wang Y, Xian Z, Meng J, Qin S, Tang X, Wang F, Liang A. Penilloic acid is the chief culprit involved in non-IgE mediated, immediate penicillin-induced hypersensitivity reactions in mice. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:874486. [PMID: 36071842 PMCID: PMC9443931 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.874486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Metabolites/impurities (MIs) of penicillin are normally considered to be the main substances inducing immediate hypersensitivity reactions in penicillin treatment. Our previous research found that penicillin can cause non-allergic hypersensitivity reactions (NAHRs) by directly triggering vascular hyperpermeability and exudative inflammation. However, the chief culprits and underlying mechanisms involved in penicillin-induced NAHRs have not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, we used a combination of approaches including a mouse non-allergic hypersensitivity reaction model, UPLC-MS/MS analyses of arachidonic acid metabolites (AAMs), immunoblotting technique, and molecular docking, etc to investigate the culprits involved in penicillin-induced hypersensitivity reactions. We found penilloic acid, one of the main MIs of penicillin, could trigger NAHRs via inducing increased vascular permeability, while the other MIs did no exhibit similar effect. Penilloic acid-induced reactions were not IgE-dependent. Significantly increased arachidonic acids and cascade metabolites in lungs, and activation of RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway in the ears and lungs of mice were noticed after once administration of penilloic acid. This study revealed that penilloic acid was the chief culprit involved in penicillin-induced immediate NAHRs in mice, which mainly associated with direct stimulation of vascular hyperpermeability and exudative inflammation. The activations of AAMs and RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway played important roles in these reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dunfang Wang
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayin Han
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Pan
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Chunying Li
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Suyan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yushi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jingzhuo Tian
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Yi
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jingjing Zhu
- National Engineering Laboratory for Quality Control Technology of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Chenyue Liu
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhong Xian
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Meng
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shasha Qin
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xuan Tang
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Aihua Liang
- Key Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Aihua Liang,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Collins K, Rueter K, Lucas M, Sommerfield D, Sommerfield A, Khan N, von Ungern‐Sternberg BS. Penicillin allergy SHACK: Survey of hospital and community knowledge. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58:1414-1419. [PMID: 35502826 PMCID: PMC9546145 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM Penicillin allergy accounts for the majority of all reported adverse drug reactions in adults and children. Foregoing first-line antibiotic therapy due to penicillin allergy label is associated with an increased prevalence of infections by resistant organisms and longer hospitalisation. Clinician awareness of allergy assessment, referral indications, management of allergy and anaphylaxis is therefore vital but globally lacking. We aim to assess the knowledge of penicillin allergy, assessment and management in Western Australian health professionals. METHODS An anonymous survey was distributed to pharmacists, nurses and physicians within Western Australian paediatric and adult Hospitals, Community and General Practice. RESULTS In total, 487/611 were completed and included in the statistical analysis. Only 62% (301/487) of respondents routinely assessed for patient medication allergies. Of those who assessed allergy, 9% (28/301) of respondents met the Australian standards for allergy assessment. Only 22% (106/487) of participants correctly cited all indications for management with adrenaline in anaphylaxis to antibiotics and 67% (197/292) of physicians rarely or never referred to an allergy service. Paediatric clinicians had an increased understanding of allergy assessment and anaphylaxis management. Recent penicillin allergy education within a 5-year period led to significant improvements in allergy knowledge. CONCLUSION Overall, knowledge, assessment and management of penicillin allergies among practitioners in Western Australia are currently inadequate in adults and paediatric clinicians to provide safe and effective clinical care. The implementation of a targeted education program for WA health professionals is urgently required and is expected to improve clinician knowledge and aid standardised penicillin assessment (de-labelling) practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Collins
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain ManagementPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Kristina Rueter
- Department of Emergency MedicinePerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Department of ImmunologyPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,School of MedicineThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Michaela Lucas
- Department of ImmunologyPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,School of MedicineThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Department of ImmunologySir Charles Gairdner HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Institute for Immunology and Infectious DiseasesMurdoch UniversityMurdochWestern AustraliaAustralia,PathWest Laboratory MedicinePerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - David Sommerfield
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain ManagementPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,School of MedicineThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Perioperative MedicineTelethon Kids InstitutePerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Aine Sommerfield
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain ManagementPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Perioperative MedicineTelethon Kids InstitutePerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Nazim Khan
- Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Britta S von Ungern‐Sternberg
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain ManagementPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,School of MedicineThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Perioperative MedicineTelethon Kids InstitutePerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Loprete J, Katelaris CH, Evans L, Kane A, McMullan B, Wainstein B, Wong M, Post J, Suan D, Swaminathan S, Richardson R, Rogers J, Torda A, Campbell DE, Kelleher AD, Law M, Carr A, Tong WW. Standardized testing and written communication improve patient understanding of beta-lactam allergy testing outcomes: A multicenter, prospective study. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. GLOBAL 2022; 1:99-105. [PMID: 37781263 PMCID: PMC10509847 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Background Historical penicillin allergy is commonly reported, but the lack of standardized allergy clinic practices may diminish the ability to delabel beta-lactam allergy appropriately. Objective We sought to improve beta-lactam allergy testing and patient understanding of their antibiotic allergy status by standardizing testing and communication practices between 7 adult and pediatric hospital centers. Methods Phase 1 prospectively described the beta-lactam allergy testing practices at each center. Following this, practice was standardized to achieve a defined panel of skin testing reagents, pro forma result letters for patients and referring doctors, and provision of medical alert jewelry to those with confirmed allergy. Testing outcomes and patient perception regarding allergy status 8 weeks postassessment were compared before (phase 1) and after standardization (phase 2). Primary outcomes were the percentage of participants delabeled after testing, and concordance rates between participant perception of their allergy status and their status as determined by the treating physician at 8-week follow-up. Results Of 195 adult and pediatric participants (median age, 50 years; 21.5% <18 years; 36.9% males), 75% were delabeled of their beta-lactam allergy. No patient experienced anaphylaxis related to any beta-lactam delabeling testing. In phase 1, 75% of participants received written results, 52% were informed verbally, and 48% received results in more than 1 form. All phase 2 participants received written results (P < .01), 61% received verbal results from a physician as well (P > .05). At 8-week follow-up, 54% of phase 1 participants had concordant perceptions of their allergy status as the testing team versus 91.6% in phase2 (P < .001). Of the 17 participants who were delabeled and treated with a beta-lactam antibiotic during the 8-week follow-up period, there were no reported allergic reactions, although 1 participant experienced anaphylaxis following exposure to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 1 year after delabeling. Conclusions Standardization of testing and written patient information improved short-term patient perception of beta-lactam allergy status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Loprete
- Immunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Constance H. Katelaris
- Campbelltown Hospital, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia
| | | | - Alisa Kane
- Immunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Brendan McMullan
- Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, Australia
- St Vincent’s Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brynn Wainstein
- Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, Australia
- St Vincent’s Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Melanie Wong
- Children’s Hospital Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- School of Medicine, Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Post
- St Vincent’s Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Daniel Suan
- St Vincent’s Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Sanjay Swaminathan
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia
- School of Medicine, Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Robyn Richardson
- St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jamie Rogers
- St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adrienne Torda
- St Vincent’s Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Dianne E. Campbell
- Children’s Hospital Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- School of Medicine, Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anthony D. Kelleher
- Immunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew Law
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Carr
- Immunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- St Vincent’s Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Winnie W.Y. Tong
- Immunology and HIV Unit, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- St Vincent’s Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Antoon JW, Grijalva CG, Grisso AG, Stone CA, Johnson J, Stassun J, Norton AE, Kripalani S, Williams DJ. Feasibility of a Centralized, Pharmacy-Led Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Program. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:e230-e237. [PMID: 35678128 PMCID: PMC9250588 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penicillin allergy labels are often inaccurate in children and removing unnecessary labels results in improved outcomes and lower health care costs. Although the hospital setting is a frequent point of contact for children, strategies to evaluate penicillin allergies in the hospital are lacking. METHODS We performed a prospective pilot study to determine the feasibility of a centralized, pharmacy-led approach to penicillin allergy evaluation. Children with a reported history of penicillin allergy admitted to our children's hospital were risk-stratified and those stratified as low-risk underwent a single-dose oral challenge by a central pharmacist, regardless of the need for antibiotics. After the completion of each patient's delabeling process, surveys were distributed to health care personnel involved in the patient's care to collect perceptions on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of this intervention. Measures were scored by using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS Of the 23 patients who screened as low-risk, 20 underwent a penicillin allergy evaluation and an oral challenge. Of these, the penicillin allergy label was removed in 19 (95%) patients (Fig 1). The median age was 7 years (range 11 months-18 years). Participants rated the risk stratification and delabeling favorably overall, with high ratings on all 3 implementation measures: acceptability (mean 4.55, ± standard deviation [STD] 0.65), appropriateness (mean 4.58, STD ± 0.6), and feasibility (mean 4.51, STD ± 0.73). Measures of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility remained high when stratified by health care worker type and provider type. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide support for systemic implementation of penicillin allergy delabeling strategies in hospitalized children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W. Antoon
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| | - Carlos G. Grijalva
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alison G. Grisso
- Department of Pharmacy, Monroe Carell Jr Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Cosby A. Stone
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Jakobi Johnson
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| | - Justine Stassun
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| | - Allison E. Norton
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Sunil Kripalani
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, and Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Derek J. Williams
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Olans RD, Olans RN, Marfatia R, Angoff GH. Inaccurate Penicillin Allergy Labeling, The Electronic Health Record, and Adverse Outcomes of Care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2022; 48:552-558. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
28
|
Alvarez-Cuesta E, Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Broyles AD, Cuesta-Herranz J, Guzman-Melendez MA, Maciag MC, Phillips EJ, Trubiano JA, Wong JT, Ansotegui I. Standards for practical intravenous rapid drug desensitization & delabeling: A WAO committee statement. World Allergy Organ J 2022; 15:100640. [PMID: 35694005 PMCID: PMC9163606 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to intravenous drugs can be severe and might leave patients and doctors in a difficult position where an essential treatment or intervention has to be suspended. Even if virtually any intravenous medication can potentially trigger a life-threatening DHR, chemotherapeutics, biologics, and antibiotics are amongst the intravenous drugs most frequently involved in these reactions. Admittedly, suspending such treatments may negatively impact the survival outcomes or the quality of life of affected patients. Delabeling pathways and rapid drug desensitization (RDD) can help reactive patients stay on first-choice therapies instead of turning to less efficacious, less cost-effective, or more toxic alternatives. However, these are high-complexity and high-risk techniques, which usually need expert teams and allergy-specific techniques (skin testing, in vitro testing, drug provocation testing) to ensure safety, an accurate diagnosis, and personalized management. Unfortunately, there are significant inequalities within and among countries in access to allergy departments with the necessary expertise and resources to offer these techniques and tackle these DHRs optimally. The main objective of this consensus document is to create a great benefit for patients worldwide by aiding allergists to expand the scope of their practice and support them with evidence, data, and experience from leading groups from around the globe. This statement of the Drug Hypersensitivity Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) aims to be a comprehensive practical guide on the technical aspects of implementing acute-onset intravenous hypersensitivity delabeling and RDD for a wide range of drugs. Thus, the manuscript does not only focus on clinical pathways. Instead, it also provides guidance on topics usually left unaddressed, namely, internal validation, continuous quality improvement, creating a healthy multidisciplinary environment, and redesigning care (including a specific supplemental section on a real-life example of how to design a dedicated space that can combine basic and complex diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in allergy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ricardo Madrigal-Burgaleta
- Allergy & Severe Asthma Service, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Drug Desensitisation Centre, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain
- Corresponding author. Allergy & Severe Asthma Service, Respiratory Department, 4th Floor, King George V Building, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Ana D. Broyles
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Javier Cuesta-Herranz
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, FIIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Madrid, Spain
- RETIC ARADyAL, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
| | | | - Michelle C. Maciag
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth J. Phillips
- Department of Medicine & Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jason A. Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Johnson T. Wong
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Steering Committee AuthorsAliF. RunaMBBS, PhD, FRCPaxAngel-PereiraDenisseMDlBanerjiAleenaMDayBerges-GimenoMaria PilarMD, PhDmBernal-RubioLorenaMDmBrockowKnutMDnCardona VillaRicardoMDoCastellsMariana C.MD, PhDpCaubetJean-ChristophMDqChangYoon-SeokMD, PhDrEnsinaLuis FelipeMD, MSc, PhDsChikhladzeMananaPhDtChiriacAnca MirelaMD, PhDuChungWeng-HungMD, PhDvEbisawaMotohiroMD, PhDwFernandesBryanMBBS, MRCPaxGarveyLene HeiseMD, PhDxawGomezMaximilianoMD, PhDyGomez VeraJavierMDzGonzalez DiazSandraMD, PhDaaHongDavid I.MDpIvancevichJuan CarlosMDabKangHye-RyunMD, PhDacKhanDavid A.MDadKuruvillaMerinMDaeLarco SousaJose IgnacioMDafLatour-StaffeldPatriciaMDagLiuAnne Y.MDahMacyEricMDaiMallingHans JorgenMDajMasperoJorgeMDakMaySara M.MDalMayorgaCristobalinaPhDamParkMiguel A.MDanPeterJonathanMBChB, PhDaoPicardMatthieuMD, FRCPCapRodriguez-BouzaTitoMD, PhDaq2RomanoAntoninoMDarSanchez-BorgesMarioMDazbaTannoLuciana KaseMD, PhDuTorresMaria JoseMD, PhDamUreña-TaveraAliciaMDasValluzziRocco L.MDatVolcheckGerald W.MDauYamaguchiMasaoMD, PhDavHospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, SpainAllergy Division, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, GermanyUniversidad de Antioquia, Medellín, ColombiaDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USAPediatric Allergy Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, SwitzerlandDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDivision of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Sao Paulo, BrazilMedical Faculty at Akaki Tsereteli State University, KuTaisi, Tskaltubo, GeorgiaDivision of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Linko and Keelung, TaiwanClinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, JapanAllergy Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Copenhagen, DenmarkSchool of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Salta, ArgentinaInstitute of Security and Social Services of State Workers, López Mateos Regional Hospital, Mexico City, MexicoRegional Center of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital “Dr. José Eleuterio González”, Gonzalitos y Madero s/n Colonia Mitras Centro, Monterrey, MexicoServicio de Alergia e Immunologia, Clinica Santa Isabel, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaInstitute of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USADivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAAllergy Department, Clinica San Felipe, Lima, PeruCentro Avanzado de Alergia y Asma de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican RepublicStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USASouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USADanish Allergy Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkAllergy and Respiratory Research Unit, Fundación CIDEA, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep & Allergy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USAAllergy Unit and Research Group, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, UMA-IBIMA-BIONAND, ARADyAL, Málaga, SpainDivision of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USADivision of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, CanadaCentro de Patología Alérgica, Hospital Quirón Palmaplanas, Palma, SpainOasi Research Institute – IRCCS, Troina, ItalyClinica Union Medica del Norte, Santiago, Dominican RepublicMultifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Predictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, ItalyDivision of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USADivision of Respiratory Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkAllergy & Severe Asthma Service, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UKDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USAAllergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, VenezuelaAllergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Clínica El Avila, Caracas, Venezuela
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nguyen M, Parashar S, Lee BR, Dowling P, Aljubran S. Twenty-year comparison of delabeling pediatric patients with penicillin allergy with and without prior skin testing. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2022; 129:117-119. [PMID: 35470037 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Nguyen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Sonya Parashar
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
| | - Brian R Lee
- Division of Health Outcomes and Health Services Research, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Paul Dowling
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Salman Aljubran
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Arıkoğlu T, Kuyucu S, Caubet JC. New diagnostıc perspectives in the management of pediatrıc beta-lactam allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13745. [PMID: 35338725 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Since overdiagnosis of beta-lactam (BL) allergy is common in the pediatric population, delabeling is a critical part of antimicrobial stewardship. Undesirable consequences of inaccurate BL allergy labeling can be handled by incorporating traditional delabeling or newer risk-based strategies into antibiotic stewardship programs. Conventional assessment of BL allergy relies upon a stepwise algorithm including a clinical history with skin testing followed by drug provocation tests (DPTs). However, a growing number of studies highlighted the suboptimal diagnostic value of skin testing in children. Recently, there has been a paradigm shift in the practice of BL allergy assessment due to recent challenging data which emphasize the safety and accuracy of direct DPTs in children with a suspicion of non-immediate mild cutaneous reactions such as maculopapular eruption, delayed urticaria, and possibly also for benign immediate reactions such as urticaria/angioedema. Identifying low-risk BL allergy patients, in whom skin tests can be skipped and proceeding directly to DPTs could be safe, has become a hot topic in recent years. New risk stratification and predictive modeling studies that have the potential to better predict BL allergy risk status have recently been introduced into the field of drug allergy, particularly in adults. However, in contrast to adults, risk assessment studies in children are rare, and optimal risk definitions are controversial. In the coming years, promising potential methods to elucidate the predictors of BL allergy in children will require multidimensional approaches that may include predictive analytics, artificial intelligence techniques, and point-of-care clinical decision tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuğba Arıkoğlu
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Semanur Kuyucu
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Jean-Christoph Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Prosty C, Copaescu AM, Gabrielli S, Mule P, Ben-Shoshan M. Pediatric Drug Allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2022; 42:433-452. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
33
|
Isserman RS, Cheung J, Varallo D, Cafone J, Lee J, Chiotos K, Muhly WT, Metjian TA, Swami S, Baldwin K, Tan JM. Increasing Cefazolin Use for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Penicillin-Allergic Children. Pediatrics 2022; 149:184738. [PMID: 35229120 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-050694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cefazolin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is the most commonly recommended antibiotic for perioperative prophylaxis to reduce surgical site infections. Children with a reported penicillin allergy often receive an alternative antibiotic because of a common misunderstanding of the cross-reactivity between these antibiotics. This use of alternative antibiotics in surgical populations have been associated with increased infections, antibiotic resistance, and health care costs. We aimed to increase the percentage of patients with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies who receive cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS A multidisciplinary team conducted this quality improvement initiative, with a series of 3 plan-do-study-act cycles aimed at children with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies undergoing surgical procedures that require antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of surgical encounters among patients with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies who received cefazolin as antibiotic prophylaxis. Statistical process control charts were used to measure improvement over time. RESULTS Approximately 400 children were involved in this project. There was special cause variation and a shift in the center line from 60% to 80% of eligible patients receiving cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis, which was sustained for the duration of the project. In the last month, 90% of eligible patient received cefazolin, surpassing our goal of 85%. This improvement has been sustained in the 5 months after project completion. We had no cases of severe allergic reactions in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS Our multidisciplinary education-focused interventions were associated with a significant increase in the use of cefazolin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patient with penicillin allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca S Isserman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine.,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jazreel Cheung
- Center for Healthcare Quality and Analytics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Domonique Varallo
- Center for Healthcare Quality and Analytics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Juhee Lee
- Divisions of Allergy and Immunology and
| | - Kathleen Chiotos
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine.,Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics.,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Wallis T Muhly
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine.,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Sanjeev Swami
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics.,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Keith Baldwin
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery.,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonathan M Tan
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions are a diverse group of reactions mediated by the immune system after exposure to a drug. The Gell and Coombs classification divides immunologic DHRs into 4 major pathophysiologic categories based on immunologic mechanism. Anaphylaxis is a Type I hypersensitivity reaction that requires immediate recognition and treatment. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are a group of dermatologic diseases that result from a Type IV hypersensitivity process and include drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS) syndrome, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Other types of reactions are slow to develop and do not always require rapid treatment. Emergency physicians should have a good understanding of these various types of drug hypersensitivity reactions and how to approach the patient regarding evaluation and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Gentry Wilkerson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Minaldi E, Phillips EJ, Norton A. Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Beta-Lactam Antibiotics. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2021; 62:449-462. [PMID: 34767158 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08903-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Beta-lactam antibiotics are the most commonly reported drug allergy in adults and children. More than 95% of those with reported allergy labels to beta lactams are not confirmed when subjected to allergy testing. Beta lactam antibiotics are associated with a wide spectrum of immediate and delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. The latency period to symptoms and clinical presentation aids in the causality assessment. Risk stratification based on diagnosis and timing then allows for appropriate management and evaluation. Skin prick testing, intradermal testing and oral challenge are well established for evaluation of immediate reactions. Delayed intradermal testing, patch testing and oral challenge can also be considered for evaluation of mild to moderate delayed reactions. Cross-reactivity between beta-lactams appears to be driven most commonly by a shared R1 side-chain. Standardized algorithms, protocols and pathways are needed for widespread implementation of a pragmatic and effective approach to patients reporting beta lactam allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Minaldi
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Allison Norton
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Arikoglu T, Kont AO, Demirhan A, Yuksek BC, Tokmeci N, Kuyucu S. Risk stratification in beta-lactam allergy. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-021-00295-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
37
|
Development and Validation of a Mobile Clinical Decision Support Tool for the Diagnosis of Drug Allergy in Adults: The Drug Allergy App. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:4410-4418.e4. [PMID: 34506965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penicillin allergy overdiagnosis has been associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, increased antimicrobial resistance, worse clinical outcomes, and increased health care costs. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a questionnaire-based algorithm built in a mobile application to support clinicians in collecting accurate history of previous reactions and diagnosing drug allergy appropriately. METHODS A survey was completed by 164 medical and nonmedical prescribers to understand barriers to best practice. Based on the survey recommendations, we created a 10-item questionnaire-based algorithm to allow classification of drug allergy history in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on drug allergy. The algorithm was incorporated into a mobile application and retrospectively validated using anonymized clinical databases at regional immunology and dermatology centers in Manchester, United Kingdom. RESULTS A total of 55.2% of prescribers (95% confidence interval, 47% to 63.4%) thought it impossible to draw a firm conclusion based on history alone and 59.4% (95% CI, 51.4% to 67.5%) believed that regardless of the details of the penicillin allergy history, they would avoid all β-lactams. A drug allergy mobile application was developed and retrospectively validated, which revealed a low risk for misclassification of outcomes compared with reference standard drug allergy investigations in the allergy and dermatology clinics. CONCLUSIONS Perceived lack of time and preparedness to collect an accurate drug allergy history appear to be important barriers to appropriate antimicrobial prescribing. The Drug Allergy App may represent a useful clinical decision support tool to diagnose drug allergy correctly and support appropriate antibiotic prescribing.
Collapse
|
38
|
Wang H, Kozman M, Pierce H, Ma L, Collins C. A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Primary Care Referral Rates for Penicillin Allergy Delabeling. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 128:33-38. [PMID: 34352357 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 10% of the U.S. population report a penicillin allergy but >90% can ultimately tolerate penicillin. Confirmation of these allergies in the pediatric population may improve future health outcomes and decrease costs. Referring patients for confirmatory testing is the first step in clarifying penicillin allergies. OBJECTIVE Utilizing an educational session and a Best Practices Advisory (BPA) in the electronic medical record (EMR) to increase the number of referrals of patients with listed penicillin allergies from the UCSD Academic General Pediatrics (AGP) clinics to Rady Children's Hospital Allergy clinics. METHODS An educational session with attendings and three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were completed utilizing a best practice advisory (BPA) alert which triggered for all patients with a documented penicillin-class drug allergy to draw attention and facilitate referral. The BPA was modified at each PDSA cycle based on physician input. RESULTS At baseline, 1.9% of referrals to Allergy Clinic were for penicillin-class drug allergies. Following an attending physician educational session, the percentage increased to 13.7%. The BPA was implemented with further increase to 27.8% of all allergy referrals over the course of three PDSA cycles. Not all patients with penicillinclass drug allergies were referred and the reasons were documented when the physicians dismissed the BPA. 35% of the time, physicians did not refer because of time constraints as opposed to patient/parent disinterest which was 8% of the time. CONCLUSION Referrals to the allergist for confirmatory testing in patients with listed penicillin allergies increased by more than 10 fold. This study illustrates successful tools to support delabeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Wang
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Maggie Kozman
- Harbor, UCLA Medical Center and David Geffin School of Medicine at UCLA
| | - Heather Pierce
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, San Diego, California, USA; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Lawrence Ma
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Cathleen Collins
- Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA; Division of Allergy Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Antoon JW, Grisso AG, Stone CA. Breaking the Mold: Safely Delabeling Penicillin Allergies in Hospitalized Children. Hosp Pediatr 2021; 11:e70-e72. [PMID: 33849961 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-005280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James W Antoon
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University and Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee;
| | - Alison G Grisso
- Department of Pharmacy, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee; and
| | - Cosby A Stone
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Thimmesch M, El Abd K. Quels examens devraient être réalisés lors d’une suspicion d’allergie aux bêta-lactamines chez l’enfant ? REVUE FRANÇAISE D'ALLERGOLOGIE 2021; 61:81-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.reval.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
|
41
|
Kern WV, Horn S, Fink G. Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Bereich Antibiotic Stewardship. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2020; 145:1758-1763. [DOI: 10.1055/a-0982-8842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Was ist neu?
Antibiotikaverbrauch in Deutschland In Deutschland wurden in den letzten Jahren sowohl im Krankenhausbereich als auch im ambulanten Setting immer weniger Fluorchinolone verordnet. Auch der Verbrauch der Cephalosporine ging etwas zurück.
Renaissance von Aminoglykosiden? Die inzwischen relativ seltenen Substanzen können aufgrund einer recht guten Resistenzlage bei Harnwegsinfektionen als geeignete Alternative – allerdings nur parenteral – eingesetzt werden. Bei akuten schweren Infektionen ist eine einmalige Gabe, z. B. von Tobramycin, initial zusätzlich zu einem geeigneten Betalactam ebenfalls eine Option, aber keine klare Empfehlung.
Antibiotikaeinsatz in der Hämatologie/Onkologie Bei Fieber und Neutropenie gilt nach wie vor die initiale empirische Gabe von Piperacillin-Tazobactam oder einem pseudomonasaktiven Carbapenem als Standard. Diese Betalactame sollten mit verlängerter Infusionsdauer, z. B. über 4 h, verabreicht werden. Linezolid ist ein Reservemedikament und sollte auch bei hämatoonkologischen Patienten nicht empirisch, sondern nur in der gezielten Therapie verwendet werden.
Penicillinallergie Die anamnestische Angabe einer Penicillinallergie sollte durch genaues Hinterfragen differenziert werden. Patienten können so bezüglich ihres Risikos für allergische Reaktionen gruppiert werden – oft besteht kein oder ein sehr geringes Risiko bei einer (erneuten) Behandlung mit Penicillinderivaten. Niedrigrisikopatienten dürfen ohne weitergehende allergologische Untersuchungen reexponiert werden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winfried V. Kern
- Abteilung Infektiologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Stephan Horn
- Abteilung Infektiologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Geertje Fink
- Abteilung Infektiologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sobrino-García M, Moreno EM, Muñoz-Bellido FJ, Gracia-Bara MT, Laffond E, Doña I, Martín C, Macías EM, de Arriba S, Campanón V, Gallardo A, Dávila I. Analysis of the Costs Associated With the Elective Evaluation of Patients Labelled as Allergic to Beta-Lactams or Nonsteroidal Antiinflamatory Agents. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:584633. [PMID: 33746738 PMCID: PMC7970755 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.584633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Being labelled as allergic to different drugs results in patients receiving other treatments, which are more toxic, less effective and more expensive. We aimed to analyze different studies of the costs of drug hypersensitivity assessment. Methods: A bibliographic search on studies regarding this issue was performed, including the available scientific evidence up to June 2020. We searched three databases with terms related to costs and allergy testing in drug hypersensitivity reactions. Results: Our search revealed 1,430 publications, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. In the manuscript, prospective studies evaluating the costs of the evaluation of patients with suspected allergy to beta-lactams or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are analyzed. Also, comment is made on the costs associated with incorrect labeling as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or penicillin hypersensitivity. Conclusions: Taking all costs into account, the study of drug hypersensitivity is not expensive, particularly considering the economic and clinical consequences of labeling a patient with hypersensitivity to drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther M Moreno
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.,Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Asthma, Allergic and Adverse Reactions (ARADyAL), Network for Cooperative Research in Health of Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Salamanca University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Francisco J Muñoz-Bellido
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.,Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Maria T Gracia-Bara
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Elena Laffond
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.,Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Doña
- Asthma, Allergic and Adverse Reactions (ARADyAL), Network for Cooperative Research in Health of Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Salamanca University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain.,Allergy Service, University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Cristina Martín
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Eva M Macías
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.,Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Sonia de Arriba
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.,Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Valle Campanón
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Alicia Gallardo
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ignacio Dávila
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.,Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Asthma, Allergic and Adverse Reactions (ARADyAL), Network for Cooperative Research in Health of Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Salamanca University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Castells MC. Drug allergy labeling and delabeling in the coronavirus disease 2019 era: What is important and what do we need to know. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 124:523-525. [PMID: 32448437 PMCID: PMC7242927 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana C Castells
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|