Malignant insulinoma: recommendations for characterisation and treatment

Approach to the Patient: Insulinoma

Insulinomas are hormone-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with an estimated incidence of 1 to 4 cases per million per year. Extrapancreatic insulinomas are extremely rare. Most insulinomas present with the Whipple triad: (1) symptoms, signs, or both consistent with hypoglycemia; (2) a low plasma glucose measured at the time of the symptoms and signs; and (3) relief of symptoms and signs when the glucose is raised to normal. Nonmetastatic insulinomas are nowadays referred to as "indolent" and metastatic insulinomas as "aggressive." The 5-year survival of patients with an indolent insulinoma has been reported to be 94% to 100%; for patients with an aggressive insulinoma, this amounts to 24% to 67%. Five percent to 10% of insulinomas are associated with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Localization of the insulinoma and exclusion or confirmation of metastatic disease by computed tomography is followed by endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for indolent, localized insulinomas. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography or positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is a highly sensitive localization technique for seemingly occult, indolent, localized insulinomas. Supportive measures and somatostatin receptor ligands can be used for to control hypoglycemia. For single solitary insulinomas, curative surgical excision remains the treatment of choice. In aggressive malignant cases, debulking procedures, somatostatin receptor ligands, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, everolimus, sunitinib, and cytotoxic chemotherapy can be valuable options.

Insulinoma: Metastatic Recurrence 38 Years Following Initial Diagnosis in Pregnancy

A case of recurrent insulinoma spanning 4 decades is described. Following a delayed diagnosis, hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia was confirmed in a 24-year-old woman during early pregnancy. Initial surgery, culminating in subtotal pancreatectomy, was noncurative. A 1-cm insulinoma was subsequently resected from the head of the pancreas postpartum, with postoperative resolution of hypoglycemia. However, 32 years later, the patient experienced a recurrence of hypoglycemic symptoms. Eventually, a subcentimeter extrapancreatic lesion was identified anterior to the pancreatic head on gallium-68 DOTA-Exendin-4 positron emission tomography/computed tomography. In 2022, a third operation was performed, with excision of a 4 × 3 mm tumor adjacent to the pancreatic head, and histology confirming insulinoma. She was again cured of symptoms.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Is Effective for Clinical Control of Symptomatic Metastatic Insulinoma: A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis

Metastatic insulinoma is a rare malignant neuroendocrine tumor characterized by inappropriate insulin secretion, resulting in life-threatening hypoglycemia, which is often difficult to treat. There is currently very limited information about the efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for clinical control of hypoglycemia. The aim of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of PRRT for improving hypoglycemia, to evaluate the change of medication after PRRT, and to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Inclusion criteria were histologically proven somatostatin receptor-positive metastatic malignant insulinoma and at least 2 cycles of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC or [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC therapy from early 2000 to early 2022. A semiquantitative scoring system was used to quantify the severity and frequency of hypoglycemic episodes under background antihypoglycemic therapy (somatostatin analog, diazoxide, everolimus, corticosteroids): score 0, no hypoglycemic episodes; score 1, hypoglycemic events requiring additional conservative treatment with optimization of nutrition; score 2, severe hypoglycemia necessitating hospitalization and combined medication or history of hypoglycemic coma. Hypoglycemic score before and after PRRT was analyzed. Time of benefit was defined as a time range of fewer hypoglycemic episodes in the observation period than at baseline. Information on antihypoglycemic medication before and after therapy, PFS, and OS was recorded. Results: Twenty-six of 32 patients with a total of 106 [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC cycles were included. The average observation period was 21.5 mo (range, 2.3-107.4 mo). Before therapy, 81% (n = 21) of the patients had a hypoglycemia score of 2 and 19% (n = 5) had a score of 1. After PRRT, 81% of patients (n = 21) had a decreased score, and the remaining 5 patients showed a stable situation. There was temporary worsening of hypoglycemia just after injection of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC in 19% of patients. The average time of benefit in the observation period was 17.2 mo (range, 0-70.2 mo). Antihypoglycemic medication reduction was achieved in 58% (n = 15) of patients. The median OS and PFS after the start of PRRT were 19.7 mo (95% CI, 6.5-32.9 mo) and 11.7 mo (95% CI, 4.9-18.5 mo), respectively. Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study included the largest cohort of patients with malignant insulinoma to be evaluated. Long-lasting symptom control and reduction of antihypoglycemic medications were shown in most patients after late-line PRRT.

Malignant insulinoma: Can we predict the long-term outcomes?

Insulinomas are the most frequent type of functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with a variety of neuroglycopenic and autonomic symptoms and well-defined diagnostic criteria; however, prediction of their clinical behavior and early differentiation between benign and malignant lesions remain a challenge. The comparative studies between benign and malignant cases are limited, suggesting that short clinical history, early hypoglycemia during fasting, high proinsulin, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations raise suspicion of malignancy. Indeed, malignant tumors are larger with higher mitotic count and Ki-67 proliferative activity, but there are no accurate histological criteria to distinguish benign from malignant forms. Several signaling pathways have been suggested to affect the pathophysiology and behavior of insulinomas; however, our knowledge is limited, urging a further understanding of molecular genetics. Therefore, there is a need for the identification of reliable markers of metastatic disease that could also serve as therapeutic targets in patients with malignant insulinoma. This opinion review reflects on current gaps in diagnostic and clinical aspects related to the malignant behavior of insulinoma.

Pasireotide for Refractory Hypoglycemia in Malignant Insulinoma- Case Report and Review of the Literature

Malignant insulinomas are functional neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas and the primary cause of tumor-related hypoglycemia. Malignant insulinoma is rare and has a poor prognosis. We report a case of metastatic malignant insulinoma in a 64-year-old female patient with severe and refractory hypoglycemia. After several ineffective locoregional and systemic therapeutic lines for the secretory disease, the introduction of pasireotide, a second-generation somatostatin analog, provided an improved clinical and secretory evolution both quickly and sustainably, with an excellent safety profile. Pasireotide is an effective and well-tolerated therapy in the treatment of refractory hypoglycemia in metastatic insulinoma.

Metastatic insulinoma presenting after bariatric surgery in a patient diagnosed with MEN1

Insulinomas are uncommon neuroendocrine tumors and metastatic disease is extremely rare. We report a patient with metastatic insulinoma associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 presenting with hypoglycemia following sleeve gastrectomy. Potential causes of hypoglycemia include dumping syndrome, noninsulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia syndrome, and rarely insulinoma. MEN1‐associated insulinomas have a higher recurrence rate.

Carcinoid Syndrome and Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia Associated with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Critical Review on Clinical and Pharmacological Management

The carcinoid syndrome (CS) and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (HH) represent two of the most common clinical syndromes associated with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The former is mainly related to the serotonin secretion by a small bowel NEN, whereas the latter depends on an insulin hypersecretion by a pancreatic insulinoma. Both syndromes/conditions can affect prognosis and quality of life of patients with NENs. They are often diagnosed late when patients become strongly symptomatic. Therefore, their early detection and management are a critical step in the clinical management of NEN patients. A dedicated and experienced multidisciplinary team with appropriate therapeutic strategies is needed and should be encouraged to optimize clinical outcomes. This review aims to critically analyze clinical features, evidence and treatment options of CS and HH and therefore to improve their management.

Phakomatoses and Endocrine Gland Tumors: Noteworthy and (Not so) Rare Associations

Phakomatoses encompass a group of rare genetic diseases, such as von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and Cowden syndrome (CS). These disorders are due to molecular abnormalities on the RAS-PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway for NF1, TSC and CS, and to hypoxia sensing for VHL. Phakomatoses share some phenotypic traits such as neurological, ophthalmological and cutaneous features. Patients with these diseases are also predisposed to developing multiple endocrine tissue tumors, e.g., pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas are frequent in VHL and NF1. All forms of phakomatoses except CS may be associated with digestive neuroendocrine tumors. More rarely, thyroid cancer and pituitary or parathyroid adenomas have been reported. These susceptibilities are noteworthy, because their occurrence rate, prognosis and management differ slightly from the sporadic forms. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on endocrine glands tumors associated with VHL, NF1, TSC, and CS, especially neuroendocrine tumors and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. We particularly detail recent advances concerning prognosis and management, especially parenchyma-sparing surgery and medical targeted therapies such as mTOR, MEK and HIF-2 α inhibitors, which have shown truly encouraging results.

Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Which Systemic Treatment Should I Start With?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) often present as advanced disease and there is little data to guide treatment sequencing in the advance disease setting. Therefore, we aim to provide a comprehensive summary of the current evidence supporting the use of systemic treatment for patients with diagnosis of advanced and metastatic panNENs, as well as to provide strategies for treatment selection and address challenges for treatment selection and sequencing of therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Substantial advances have been made and many clinical trials have been performed over the past two decades expanding therapeutic options available for patients with advanced panNETs. Available systemic treatments for patients with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors include somatostatin receptors ligands (SRLs), traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT), and biologically targeted therapies, whereas patients with poorly differentiated neurodocrine carcinomas have more limited treatment options. Despite these advances, no clear guidelines exist to support the best sequence of treatments, not only the first-line, but also subsequent lines of therapy in patients with panNENs. Advances in molecular research and discovery of biomarkers for response allowing a more personalized approach to the multimodality therapy of panNENs are still limited. Understanding the impact of previous therapies on subsequent treatment efficacy and toxicity is also an ongoing research question. In the absence of definite predictive markers and paucity of comparative randomized trials, along with the heterogeneity of this patient population, systemic therapy selection in advanced non-resectable disease should be patient centered and often require evaluation within a multidisciplinary setting. The specific clinical context of the patient, with assessment of individual patient clinical and pathological features, somatostatin receptors imaging, and goals of treatment must all be considered when deciding on systemic therapy in the patient. Additional research is needed to address the gap in knowledge regarding optimal sequencing and timing of therapies and to provide individual care.

Malignant Insulinoma: A Rare Form of Neuroendocrine Tumor

INTRODUCTION

Due to the rarity of malignant insulinoma, a lack of the literature describing factors affecting outcomes exists. Our aim was to review malignant insulinoma incidence, characteristics and survival trends.

METHODS

We identified all patients with malignant insulinoma in the SEER registries from 1973 to 2015. Incidence, neoplasm characteristics and factors affecting cancer-specific survival (CSS) were described.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients were identified. The crude annual overall incidence was low (range 0.0-0.27 cases per million person years). The largest proportion had localized disease (40%), while 16% had regional disease, 39% distant metastatic disease, and stage was unreported in 5%. Most neoplasms were in the body/tail of the pancreas, followed by the head of the pancreas. Grade was reported in 40% of patients; only a single patient reported as having grade IV with the remainder all grades I/II. Surgical resection was performed in 64% of patients. Within surgical patients, the median primary neoplasm size was 1.8 cm. Regional lymph nodes were examined in 57.1% of surgical patients, while 34% of examined nodes were positive. The median CSS was 183 months. On multivariable analysis, surgical resection, male sex and absence of metastatic disease were associated with superior survival.

CONCLUSION

While the greatest proportion of patients with malignant insulinoma present with localized disease, regional lymph node involvement was found in 34% of whose nodes were tested. Further studies are needed to assess the role of lymph node dissection in improving survival and preventing recurrence given the observed frequency of lymph node involvement.

Metastatic insulinoma presenting 14 years after benign tumour resection: a rare case and management dilemma

SUMMARY

We present a 60-year-old woman who underwent successful surgical resection (partial pancreatectomy) for a low grade non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (pNET), with no biochemical or radiological features of recurrence on follow-up visits for 5 years. Fourteen years after the initial surgery, she developed spontaneous severe hypoglycaemic episodes which required hospitalisation, with subsequent investigations confirming the diagnosis of a metastatic insulin-secreting pNET (insulinoma). Medical management of her severe spontaneous hypoglycaemic episodes remained challenging, despite optimum use of diazoxide and somatostatin analogue therapy. Based on a discussion at the regional neuroendocrine tumour multidisciplinary team meeting, she underwent an elective hepatic trans-arterial embolization which was unfortunately unsuccessful. She ended up requiring an emergency right hemihepatectomy and left retroperitoneal mass resection which finally stabilised her clinical condition.

LEARNING POINTS

Ours is only the seventh case report of a previously benign pNET presenting as a functional insulin secreting metastatic tumour. However, it is the first case report, in which the metastatic functional pNET presented after such a long hiatus (14 years). There is currently no clear consensus regarding the length of follow-up of non-functional pNET which are deemed cured post-surgical resection, with most guidelines advocating a median follow up of 5 years (1). The delayed presentation in our case suggests additional considerations should be made regarding optimal post-operative surveillance duration based on the age of the patient, location of the tumour, lymph node spread and Ki-67 index. Hepatic artery embolization and/or partial hepatectomy remains a treatment option for pNET patients with significant hepatic metastasis.

Surgical Management of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Pancreas

Neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas (pNET) are rare, accounting for 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. They develop from pancreatic islet cells and cover a wide range of heterogeneous neoplasms. While most pNETs are sporadic, some are associated with genetic syndromes. Furthermore, some pNETs are 'functioning' when there is clinical hypersecretion of metabolically active peptides, whereas others are 'non-functioning'. pNET can be diagnosed at a localised stage or a more advanced stage, including regional or distant metastasis (in 50% of cases) mainly located in the liver. While surgical resection is the cornerstone of the curative treatment of those patients, pNET management requires a multidisciplinary discussion between the oncologist, radiologist, pathologist, and surgeon. However, the scarcity of pNET patients constrains centralised management in high-volume centres to provide the best patient-tailored approach. Nonetheless, no treatment should be initiated without precise diagnosis and staging. In this review, the steps from the essential comprehensive preoperative evaluation of the best surgical approach (open versus laparoscopic, standard versus sparing parenchymal pancreatectomy, lymphadenectomy) according to pNET staging are analysed. Strategies to enhance the short- and long-term benefit/risk ratio in these particular patients are discussed.

Should everolimus be stopped after radiological progression in metastatic insulinoma? A "cons" point of view

Insulinoma is a rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) potentially associated with severe hypoglycaemic crisis. The great majority of these tumors are benign. In patients with metastatic malignant insulinoma, systemic therapies aim to control both the syndrome and tumor growth. Everolimus is a drug approved for the management of advanced pNETs that can achieve both these goals. According to international guidelines and regulatory authorities, everolimus in patients with pNET should be continued until the demonstration of disease progression with standard radiologic imaging techniques. The drug is neither recommended nor authorized beyond progression. This could not be the case of advanced insulinoma patients since the antineoplastic and the glycaemic effects of everolimus seem to follow independent mechanisms. The authors present here their point of view in favor of continuing everolimus beyond progression in symptomatic insulinoma patients on the basis of a robust rationale and describing a case.

Comparison of benign and malignant insulinoma

BACKGROUND

How malignant insulinomas present relative to benign insulinomas is unknown.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective study identified patients with insulinoma. Malignancy was defined by distant metastases, positive lymph node(s), T stage of 4, direct invasion into surrounding peripancreatic tissue, or presence of lymphovascular invasion. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients were identified: 51 malignant and 260 benign. Patients with malignant insulinoma presented with higher levels of insulin, proinsulin, and c-peptide. Malignant lesions were larger: 4.2 ± 3.2 vs 1.8 ± 0.8 cm in benign lesions, p < 0.01. Overall survival at 5 years was 66.8% vs 95.4% for malignant and benign insulinoma respectively, p < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger size of insulinoma and increased serum β-cell polypeptide concentrations were associated with malignancy. Malignant insulinoma has poorer survival. Further work-up to rule out malignancy may be indicated for larger pancreatic lesions and for patients with higher pre-operative insulin and pro-insulin.

Successful Long-Term Medical Management of Unresectable Insulinomas

In this paper, we present two patients with unresectable insulinomas and a literature review. Patient 1: A 58-year-old woman was diagnosed at age 42, with an insulinoma in the pancreatic tail and hepatic metastasis. She underwent distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, hepatic wedge resection, and chemoembolization, with resolution of her symptoms. By age 48, her symptoms returned, with new hepatic metastasis. She started long-acting octreotide, with subsequent resolution of her symptoms. She has since had an unremarkable clinical course. Patient 2: A 48-year-old female was diagnosed at age 37. Numerous imaging modalities and two exploratory surgeries did not localize a mass. A distal pancreatectomy did not resolve her symptoms. She tried several medications before her symptoms were finally controlled with low-dose prednisone. She has continued prednisone and diazoxide treatment for the past decade, which controls her symptoms, along with diet modification. In conclusion, while prednisone is not standard therapy, it can control symptoms in patients with unresectable insu­linoma. Providers should be aware of available and emerging medical options. Patients with unresectable insulinomas will likely have better long-term survival rates than those quoted in historical literature. Additional studies are needed to elucidate survival rate and the long-term efficacy of medical therapies.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This article is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The guidelines panel consisted of medical oncologists, pathologists, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The panel reviewed a series of questions regarding the medical management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The available literature was reviewed for each of the question and panel members voted on controversial topics, and the recommendations were included in a document circulated to all panel members for a final approval.

Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN): French Intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, GTE, RENATEN, TENPATH, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) published in February 2020 (www.tncd.org).

METHODS

All French medical societies involved in the management of NEN took part in this work. Recommendations were graded into four categories (A, B, C or D), according to the level of evidence found in the literature until May 2019.

RESULTS

The management of NEN is challenging because of their heterogeneity and the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pathological analysis is required for their diagnostic and prognostic characterization, which mainly relies on differentiation, grade and stage. The two main emergency situations are functioning syndromes and poorly-differentiated carcinoma. Chromogranin A is the main biochemical marker of NET, although of limited clinical interest. Initial characterization relies on morphological and isotopic imaging. The treatment of localized NET relies on watchful follow-up and local or surgical resection depending on its supposed aggressiveness. Treatment options for metastatic disease include surgery, somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, organ-driven locoregional therapies and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy. As specific predictive factors of treatment efficacy are yet to be identified and head-to-head comparisons have not or only rarely been performed, the therapeutic strategy currently depends on prognostic factors. Cumulative toxicity and the impact of treatment on quality of life must be considered since survival is relatively long in most patients with NET.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are proposed to achieve the most beneficial therapeutic strategy in clinical practice as the therapeutic landscape of NEN is becoming ever more complex. These recommendations are permanently being reviewed.

Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an introduction

Introduction: Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas (pNETs) represent only 1% to 2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. These tumors can be classified as functional or nonfunctional tumors; as sporadic or from a genetic origin; as neuroendocrine neoplasms or carcinoma. Over the last decade, diagnosis of pNETs has increased significantly mainly due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. Those tumors are usually associated with a good prognosis. Surgery, the only curative option for those patients, should always be discussed, ideally in a multidisciplinary team setting.Areas covered: We discuss i), the preoperative management of pNETs and the importance of accurate diagnosis, localization, grading and staging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, and nuclear medicine imaging; ii), surgical indications and iii), the surgical approach (standard pancreatectomy vs pancreatic-sparing surgery).Expert opinion: The treatment option of all patients presenting with pNETs should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting with surgeon's experienced in both pancreatic surgery and neuroendocrine tumor management. A complete preoperative imaging assessment - morphological and functional - must be performed. Surgery is usually recommended for functional pNETs, nonfunctional pNETs >2 cm (nf-pNETs) or for symptomatic nf-pNETs.

Targeted Systemic Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Options and Future Perspectives

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) originate from the neuroendocrine cell system in the bronchial and gastrointestinal tract and can produce hormones leading to distinct clinical syndromes. Systemic treatment of patients with unresectable NETs aims to control symptoms related to hormonal overproduction and tumor growth. In the last decades prognosis has improved as a result of increased detection of early stage disease and the introduction of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) as well as several new therapeutic options. SSAs are the first-line medical treatment of NETs and can control hormonal production and tumor growth. The development of next-generation multireceptor targeted and radiolabelled somatostatin analogs, as well as target-directed therapies (as second-line treatment options) further improve progression-free survival in NET patients. To date, however, a significant prolongation of overall survival with systemic treatment in NET has not been convincingly demonstrated. Several new medical options and treatment combinations will become available in the upcoming years, and although preliminary results of preclinical and clinical trials are encouraging, large, preferrably randomized clinical studies are required to provide definitive evidence of their effect on survival and symptom control.

Distinct clinicopathological and prognostic features of insulinoma with synchronous distant metastasis

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathological and prognostic features of insulinoma with synchronous metastases are unclear. This study aimed to verify the distinct clinicopathological and prognostic features of insulinoma with synchronous distant metastasis.

METHODS

Patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) were retrospectively enrolled and divided into cohort 1 (Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center) and cohort 2 (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database). Both cohorts were further divided into three subgroups: insulinoma, nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NF-PanNET), and non-insulinoma functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NiF-PanNET).

RESULTS

Cohorts 1 and 2 comprised 505 and 2761 patients (1566 M0 patients and 1195 M1 patients), respectively. In cohort 1 and cohort 2 M0 subgroup, insulinoma showed longer disease-free survival, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) than NiF-PanNET and NF-PanNET (not reached vs. 48 and 60months, p < 0.001; 183months vs. 87 and 109months, p < 0.001; 247months vs. 121 and 140months, p = 0.002). However, in cohort 2 M1, the mDSS for metastatic insulinoma was shorter than that for NiF-PanNET (31months vs. 61months, p = 0.045), while the mDSS and mOS were similar to those for NF-PanNET. The percentage of T1 and N0 patients was similar between the metastatic insulinoma subgroup and NiF-PanNET and NF-PanNET subgroups. The Ki-67 index and recurrence had a positive linear relationship only for NiF-PanNET and NF-PanNET (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Insulinoma with synchronous metastasis showed clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics similar to those of NF-PanNET. Metastatic insulinoma had worse prognosis than non-insulinoma F-PanNET. These findings may help in the clinical management of metastatic insulinoma.

A case of malignant insulinoma responsive to somatostatin analogs treatment

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma is a rare tumour representing 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms and it is malignant in only 10% of cases. Locoregional invasion or metastases define malignancy, whereas the dimension (> 2 cm), CK19 status, the tumor staging and grading (Ki67 > 2%), and the age of onset (> 50 years) can be considered elements of suspect.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the case of a 68-year-old man presenting symptoms compatible with hypoglycemia. The symptoms regressed with food intake. These episodes initially occurred during physical activity, later also during fasting. The fasting test was performed and the laboratory results showed endogenous hyperinsulinemia compatible with insulinoma. The patient appeared responsive to somatostatin analogs and so he was treated with short acting octreotide, obtaining a good control of glycemia. Imaging investigations showed the presence of a lesion of the uncinate pancreatic process of about 4 cm with a high sst2 receptor density. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy and duodenocephalopancreasectomy after one month. The definitive histological examination revealed an insulinoma (T3N1MO, AGCC VII G1) with a low replicative index (Ki67: 2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This report describes a case of malignant insulinoma responsive to octreotide analogs administered pre-operatively in order to try to prevent hypoglycemia. The response to octreotide analogs is not predictable and should be initially assessed under strict clinical surveillance.

Clinical Management of Malignant Insulinoma: a single Institution's experience over three decades

BACKGROUND

Malignant insulinoma is extremely rare and accounts for only 10% of total insulinoma cases. The goal of this study is to retrospectively analyze clinical data from 15 patients with malignant insulinoma treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) from 1984 to April 2017.

METHODS

"Malignant insulinoma" was used as the keywords in the PUMCH medical record retrieval system to search and obtain patients' clinical information. We identified subjects diagnosed with malignant insulinoma based on clinical or surgical pathological signs and subsequently analyzed their clinical data.

RESULTS

Eight males and seven females with a median age at diagnosis of 40 years (38-54 years) were included. Eight patients (53%) had developed metastases at diagnosis, while the others (46.67%) developed metastases during the follow-up visits. The major sites of metastasis were the liver (86.7%), local tissues and blood vessels (33%) and abdominal lymph nodes (13%). All patients displayed neuroglycopenic (100%) and/or autonomic (60%) symptoms, mostly during fasting periods (73.3%), with an average blood glucose level of 1.66 ± 0.51 mmol/L. A total of 93% of the patients had one primary pancreatic lesion, 53% had a lesion in the head of the pancreas, and 47% had a lesion in the tail of the pancreas, with diameters ranging between 0.9 and 6.0 cm. Most liver metastases were multiple lesions. Selective celiac arteriography yielded 100% sensitivity for both primary pancreatic lesions and liver metastases. Most patients received synthetical treatments, including surgery, chemoembolization, and octreotide.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant insulinomas have a similar diagnostic process to that of benign insulinomas but require far more comprehensive therapies to alleviate hypoglycemic symptoms and extend patients' survival.

Insulinoma: A retrospective study analyzing the differences between benign and malignant tumors

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Insulinoma is a rare pancreatic tumor and, usually, a benign disease but can be a malignant one and, sometimes, a highly aggressive disease. The aim of this study was to determine differences between benign and malignant tumors.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 103 patients with insulinoma treated in a tertiary center. It was analyzed demographic, clinical, laboratory, localization and histologic analysis of tumor and follow up data of subjects in order to identify differences between individuals benign and malignant disease.

RESULTS

Almost all patients (87%) had a benign tumor and survival rates of 100% following pancreatic tumor surgery. Those with malignant tumors (13%) have a poor prognosis, 77% insulinoma-related deaths over a period of 1-300 months after the diagnosis with a survival rate of 24% in five years. The following factors are associated with an increased risk of malignant disease: duration of symptoms < 24 months, fasting time for the occurrence of hypoglycemia < 8 h, blood plasma insulin concentration ≥ 28 μU/mL and C-peptide ≥ 4.0 ng/mL at the glycemic nadir and tumor size ≥ 2.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data help to base the literature about these tumors, reinforcing that although insulinoma is usually a single benign and surgically treated neoplasia, the malignant one is difficult to treat. We highlight the data that help predict a malignancy behavior of tumor and suggest a long follow up after diagnosis in these cases.

Management of functional neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) constitute a heterogenous group of malignancies with varying clinical presentation, tumor biology and prognosis. The incidence of pNETs has steadily increased during the last decades with an estimated incidence 2012 of 4.8/100,000. Recent whole genome sequencing of pNETs has demonstrated mutations in the DNA repair genes MUTYH and point mutations and gene fusions in four main pathways from chromatin remodeling, DNA damage repair, activation of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and the telomere maintenance. This new information will be the foundation for new therapies in the near future for malignant pNETs. The functioning pNETs constitute about 30-40% of all pNETs displaying nine different clinical syndromes: insulinoma, Zollinger-Ellison, Verner-Morrison, glucagonoma, somatostatinomas, ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTH-rP) syndromes. Single patients might also present carcinoid syndrome. The diagnostic work-up include histopathology with the new WHO 2017 Classification, biomarkers (CgA, NSE), radiology and molecular imaging including CT-scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound and PET-scan. A cornerstone in the treatment of pNETs is surgery which is rarely curative but can reduce the clinical symptoms by debulking which also include radiofrequency ablation, embolization of liver metastases. Medical treatment includes chemotherapy and the targeted agents such as everolimus, sunitinib and peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT). Somatostatin analogs has for the last decades been the main stay for management for clinical symptoms related to functioning pNETs and is often combined with new targeted agents as well as chemotherapy. Long-term management of functioning pNETs need a combination of different procedures, surgery, local ablation, targeted agents and somatostatin analogs. Future therapies might be based on the recent advances in molecular genetics and tumor biology.

Hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia in children and adults

Pancreatic β cells are functionally programmed to release insulin in response to changes in plasma glucose concentration. Insulin secretion is precisely regulated so that, under normal physiological conditions, fasting plasma glucose concentrations are kept within a narrow range of 3·5-5·5 mmol/L. In hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia, insulin secretion becomes dysregulated (ie, uncoupled from glucose metabolism) so that insulin secretion persists in the presence of low plasma glucose concentrations. Hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia is the most common cause of severe and persistent hypoglycaemia in neonates and children. At a molecular level, mutations in nine different genes can lead to the dysregulation of insulin secretion and cause this disorder. In adults, hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia accounts for 0·5-5·0% of cases of hypoglycaemia and can be due either to β-cell tumours (insulinomas) or β-cell hyperplasia. Rapid diagnosis and prompt management of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia is essential to avoid hypoglycaemic brain injury, especially in the vulnerable neonatal and childhood periods. Advances in the field of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia include use of rapid molecular genetic testing for the disease, application of novel imaging techniques (6-[fluoride-18]fluoro-levodopa [¹⁸F-DOPA] PET-CT and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor imaging), and development of novel medical treatments (eg, long-acting octreotide formulations, mTOR inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor antagonists) and surgical therapies (eg, laparoscopic surgery).

The treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia in adults: an update

BACKGROUND

Treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia (HH) is challenging due to the rarity of this condition and the difficulty of differential diagnosis. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the recent literature on the management of adult HH.

METHODS

A search for reviews, original articles, original case reports between 1995 and 2016 in PubMed using the following keywords: hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia, insulinoma, nesidioblastosis, gastric bypass, autoimmune hypoglycaemia, hyperinsulinism, treatment was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty articles were selected and analysed focusing on the most recent treatments of HH.

CONCLUSIONS

New approaches to treatment of HH are available including mini-invasive surgical techniques and alternative local-regional ablative therapy for benign insulinoma and everolimus for malignant insulinoma. A correct differential diagnosis is of paramount importance to avoid unnecessary surgical operations and to implement the appropriate treatment mainly in the uncommon forms of HH, such as nesidioblastosis and autoimmune hypoglycaemia.

A Clinicopathological Study of Malignant Insulinoma in a Contemporary Series

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to address the origin and natural history of malignant insulinoma.

METHODS

Retrospective review of medical records of patients diagnosed with insulinoma at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. Hormonal expression in tumor specimens was examined by immunostaining.

RESULTS

All the 9 patients with malignant insulinoma (35% of 26 patients with insulinoma) already had liver metastasis at hypoglycemia presentation with bulky cumulative tumor burden. Six patients had de novo diagnosis, 2 had known metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, and 1 had a known pancreatic mass. Tumor grade at presentation was G1 in 4 patients, G2 in 4, and unknown in 1. Four patients died 2 to 32 months after presentation, all with extensive liver tumor involvement. Tumor expression of proinsulin and insulin was heterogeneous and overall infrequent. The proinsulin levels and proinsulin/insulin molar ratio in patients with malignant versus benign insulinoma were 334 versus 44 pmol/L and 2.1 versus 0.9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant insulinoma seems to arise from and behave like nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor oncologically but with metachronous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. High proinsulin levels and proinsulin/insulin molar ratio may suggest malignant insulinoma.

Giant insulinoma: report of a case and review of published reports

Background

Larger insulinomas are reportedly more likely to be malignant; however, their biological behavior has not been clearly elucidated. We here report the characteristics and treatment of a giant insulinoma with local invasion and lymph node metastasis. We also review published reports concerning the clinical features of giant insulinomas and comparing their grading with that of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old man was referred to our hospital for investigation of persistent hypoglycemia. On the current presentation, laboratory tests showed serum glucose, immunoreactive insulin, and C peptide concentrations of 45 mg/dL, 17.2 μIU/mL and 4.1 ng/mL, respectively. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging showed a hypervascular tumor measuring 13.5 cm in the head of the pancreas. Computed tomography scanning demonstrated local invasion and lymph node involvement. He thus had Whipple’s triad, which is associated with malignant insulinoma. No distant metastases having been identified, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Intraoperatively, three separate tumors were identified in the pancreatic head. Pathological examination showed all three tumors were pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; the tumor cells in the largest mass were strongly immunoreactive for insulin. The Ki-67 index was 2–5% in most parts of the largest tumor and over 20% in the poorly differentiated areas. This tumor was classified as neuroendocrine carcinoma in accordance with the 2010 World Health Organization classification of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. He remains free of evidence of recurrence 2 years postsurgery.

A review of published reports indicated that giant insulinomas are more malignant than smaller ones, and metastatic disease is found on presentation in 56% of patients with giant insulinomas; however, we were unable to identify any correlation between grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and biological behavior of giant insulinomas.

Conclusions

Giant insulinomas more frequently exhibit malignant behavior, such as local invasion, lymph node involvement, and liver metastasis, than smaller ones. However, there was no relationship between grade and rate of metastases or survival in this small case series. Identification of useful biological markers is necessary.

Treatment of symptomatic neuroendocrine tumor syndromes: recent advances and controversies

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine tumors(NETs), once thought rare, are increasing in frequency in most countries and receiving increasing-attention. NETs present two-treatment problems. A proportion is aggressive and a proportion has a functional, hormone-excess-state(F-NET), each of which must be treated. Recently, there have been many advances, well-covered in reviews/consensus papers on imaging-NETs; new, novel anti-tumor treatments and understanding their pathogenesis. However, little attention has been paid to advances in the treatment of the hormone-excess-state. These advances are usually reported in case-series, and case-reports with few large studies. In this paper these advances are reviewed. Areas covered: Advances in the last 5-years are concentrated on, but a review of literature from the last 10-years was performed. PubMed and other databases (Cochrane, etc.) were searched for F-NET-syndromes including carcinoid-syndrome, as well as meeting-abstracts on NETs. All advances that controlled hormone-excess-states or facilitated-control were covered. These include new medical-therapies [serotonin-synthesis inhibitors(telotristat), Pasireotide, new agents for treating ACTHomas], increased dosing with conventional therapies (octreotide-LAR, Lanreotide-Autogel), mTor inhibitors(everolimus), Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors(sunitinib),cytoreductive surgery, liver-directed therapies (embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, RFA), peptide radio-receptor-therapy(PRRT) and ¹³¹I-MIBG, ablation of primary F-NETs. Expert opinion: Although many of the newer therapies controlling the hormone-excess-states in F-NETs are reported in relatively few patients, all the approaches show promise. Their description also generates some controversies/unresolved areas,such as the order of these new treatments, their longterm-efficacy, and effectiveness of combinations which may require large,controlled studies.

A malignant cause of hypoglycaemia: a metastatic insulin-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Most cases of insulinomas are benign. We report a case of a malignant form of insulinoma. A 46-year-old man presented with behavioural changes associated with hypoglycaemia. Diagnostic work up revealed high serum insulin, high C-peptide and low glucose levels, compatible with endogenous hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia. CT imaging of the abdomen revealed a pancreatic head mass and multiple liver masses. Biopsy of the pancreatic mass revealed a grade three pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Histological analysis of a liver mass showed that it was identical to the pancreatic mass, confirming its metastatic nature. The patient underwent distal pancreatectomy with en bloc splenectomy. There was persistence of hypoglycaemic symptoms after removal of the pancreatic mass, suggesting that the liver metastases were also functioning. Symptoms were controlled by diazoxide and octreotide long-acting release. The patient is already 1 year postsurgery with no recurrence of severe hypoglycaemia, and he has good functional capacity and has returned to his office job.

A rare case of hypoglycaemia due to insulinoma in an adolescent with acutely altered mental status

BACKGROUND

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an inherited neoplasia syndrome that generally presents with hypercalcaemia due to hyperparathyroidism. Insulin-producing tumours are less common components of the syndrome that emerge later during the course of the disease. We report here a case of an adolescent who presented with symptomatic hypoglycaemia as the first indication of MEN1.

CASE

A 14-year-old boy, known to use illicit drugs, was brought to the hospital with altered mental status. He was hypoglycaemic and further investigations revealed two pancreatic insulinomas. Despite having no relevant family history, genetic evaluation showed a mutation consistent with MEN1.

CONCLUSION

Insulinomas in adolescents are generally rare and even less common as a first presentation of MEN1. This diagnosis carries implications for potential future neoplasms, both benign and malignant. While intoxication is a more common case of altered mental status in adolescents, clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for organic disease.