Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma: correlation of histologic characteristics with prognosis

Lymph node metastatic patterns of gastric carcinoma with a combination of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma components

BACKGROUND

Gastric mixed-adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (G-MANEC) is a subtype of gastric cancer. Building upon prior research findings, we propose that tumours containing both neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) components, with each component ranging from 1% to 99% of the tumour, be classified as a distinct entity. We hereby term this adenoneuroendocrine mixed gastric cancer (G-ANEC). Research on lymph node (LN) involvement in G-MANEC has focused mainly on metastasis status, with limited studies on metastatic composition.

AIM

To investigate the LN metastasis patterns of G-ANEC, the clinicopathological features associated with these metastasis patterns, and to explore adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for G-ANEC.

METHODS

We analyzed 68 G-ANEC cases treated with radical surgery and confirmed LN metastasis at Peking University Cancer Hospital between August 2012 and June 2022. Utilizing χ² tests in IBM statistical product and service solutions statistics and R software.

RESULTS

We identified three distinct LN metastasis patterns in G-ANEC that were significantly associated with the NEC proportion, tumour invasion depth, Lauren classification, and tumour location (P values: 0.008, 0.015, 0.01, and 0.004, respectively). When the SOX/XELOX regimen was applied for adjuvant chemotherapy, patients with LN metastasis comprising only AC exhibited better overall survival (OS) (94.25 ± 11.07 months vs 54.36 ± 11.36 months) than did those with NEC. When LN metastasis components contained NEC, there was a trend towards improved OS (64 ± 10.77 months vs 54.35 ± 11.36 months) and disease-free survival (71.28 ± 9.92 months vs 66.28 ± 11.93 months) in patients treated with the etoposide and cisplatin compared to those receiving the SOX/XELOX regimen.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant correlation between the NEC percentage, tumour invasion depth, Lauren classification, and tumour location and LN metastasis patterns in G-ANEC. For G-ANEC, a lower proportion of NEC or AC in the primary lesion does not preclude the possibility of these components metastasizing to the LNs. Different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens should be administered on the basis of the varying components of LN metastasis in patients with G-ANEC.

An Italian real-world multicenter study of patients with advanced mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system treated with chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to describe the clinical management of an Italian series of patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) MiNENs treated in clinical practice.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients from four Italian referral Centers were retrospectively analyzed to correlate clinical/biological data with clinical outcomes. All the surgical specimens were centrally reviewed.

RESULTS

Clinical data and surgical samples of 51 patients during 1995-2015 were analyzed. Sites of origin were: 32 colorectal, 14 gastro-esophageal, and 5 pancreatobiliary. Twenty-one out of fifty-one (42.2%) developed metachronous distant metastases. Only 5/51 (9.8%) patients received peri-operative therapy, and 23/51 (45.1%) first-line chemotherapy, mostly fluoropyrimidines/oxaliplatin. The NEN component was poorly differentiated in the whole population. Patients with Ki67 index < 55% in the NEC component had a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) (35.3 months; 95% CI 27.1-41.0) than those with Ki67 ≥ 55% (11.9 months; 95% CI 9.1-14.0) P = 0.0005. The median OS was 14 months (95% CI 10.1-19.1) in the whole cohort, with 11.4 months (95% CI 6.2-20.2) in patients who received a first-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that GEP-MiNENs represent a complex disease and that over the past years the clinical management has been predominantly guided by the subjective judgment of the clinicians. Although, in this series, the NEC component appeared mostly responsible for the systemic spread and prognosis on the whole neoplasm, the lack of strong prognostic and predictive factors universally recognized seems to condition their management so far. Future prospective clinical and biomolecular studies could help clinicians to improve clinical management of GEP-MiNENs.

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

The uncommon tumour known as gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-MiNENs) is made up of parts of neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The biological and clinical features are different from those of gastric adenocarcinoma. Their pathophysiology, diagnostic standards, and clinical behaviour have all been the subject of lengthy debates, and their nomenclature has undergone multiple changes. Its emergence has created new challenges in the classification and diagnosis of gastric tumours. This review will update information on the topic, covering molecular aspects, diagnostic criteria, treatment, and prognostic factor discovery. It will also provide a historical context that will aid in understanding the evolution of the idea and nomenclature of mixed gastric tumours. Additionally, it will provide the reader a thorough understanding of this difficult topic of cancer that is applicable to real-world situations.

Digestive MiNENs: Could histological classification and molecular characterization drive clinical outcome and therapeutic approach?

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are epithelial neoplasms in which neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine discrete components are combined, each of which constitutes ≥ 30% of the neoplasm. The finding of an additional neuroendocrine component seems to characterize the tumor's biological behavior. Few studies have proved MiNENs histogenetic and molecular characterization, and the development of molecular markers for more accurate classification of MiNENs represents a clinical need. However, a common origin of the neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components from a pluripotent cancer stem cell could be suggested. The optimal clinical management of MiNENS is largely unknown. Whenever feasible, curative-intent resection should be performed for localized disease; in advanced disease, the treatment should be targeted to the component responsible for the metastatic spreading. This paper provides a revision of the current knowledge on MiNENs, focusing on available evidence about their molecular characterization to suggest a prognostic stratification of these rare forms.

Clinicopathological characteristics of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system updated the definition of mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), previously known as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs). The clinicopathological characteristics of this new definition remains to be clarified.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients diagnosed with MiNENs in Wuhan Union Hospital from 2011 to 2020 according to the definition of MiNENs proposed in 2019.

RESULTS

Among the 43 patients with MiNENs, the top two most common sites were stomach and colon, and 69.8% were males. Nearly half (21/43) of the patients were diagnosed at TNM stage III, and about 53.5% (23/43) of patients were the neuroendocrine neoplasm dominant type. Among the non-neuroendocrine tumor components of 43 MiNENs patients, adenocarcinoma accounted for 95.3% (41/43) and squamous cell carcinoma accounted for 4.7% (2/43)；95.3% (41/43) of the neuroendocrine neoplasm components were neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and 4.7% (2/43) were neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Approximately 60.5% (26/43) neuroendocrine components had a Ki-67 index ≥ 55%. In addition, we further compared the prognosis of different subtypes of the MiNENs based on the neuroendocrine neoplasm component and non-neuroendocrine neoplasm component, and the results showed that there was no significant difference in survival between different subtypes of MiNENs (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MiNENs can exhibit diverse clinicopathological characteristics, and there is no significant difference in prognosis among MiNENs subtypes, indicating that the definition of MiNENs can well summarize the prognosis of this type of tumor.

Mixed large and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is a rare histological subtype of gastric cancer, which is categorized into small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. It is characterized by strong invasiveness and poor prognosis. Mixed large and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (L/SCNEC) is an extremely rare pathological type of gastric cancer, and there have been no reports on this situation until now.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we first present a 57-year-old patient diagnosed with L/SCNEC of the stomach. A 57-year-old Chinese male presented with epigastric discomfort. Outpatient gastroscopic biopsy was performed, and pathological examination revealed that the cardia was invaded by adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical proximal subtotal gastrectomy and was diagnosed with L/SCNEC. He refused adjuvant treatment and was followed up every 3 mo. Eight months after the operation, the patient showed no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

We advocate conducting further genomic studies to explore the origin of gastric large cell and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and using different chemotherapy schemes according to large or small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach for clinical research to clarify the heterogeneity of GNEC and improve the prognosis of patients with GNEC.

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas of stomach and ampulla of vater after curative-intent resection: a single center cases series

Background

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare clinical manifestation, especially in the gastric and ampullary. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features and prognosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in the gastric and ampullary and summarize related treatment suggestions.

Methods

In all, 32 cases of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in the gastric and ampullary that were diagnosed from resected specimens were analyzed from 2009 to 2015. The corresponding demographic, clinicopathological and survival data were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 78.1%, 28.1 and 9.4%, respectively, and the median overall survival was 28.0 months. In all, 75.0% (24/32) had lymph node metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis. A multivariate analysis revealed that TNM stage (HR 6.444 95%CI 1.477–28.121 P = 0.013), lymph nodes metastasis (HR10.617 95%CI 1.409–79.997 P = 0.022), vascular invasion (HR 5.855 95%CI 1.719–19.940 P = 0.005), grade of the adenocarcinoma component (HR 3.876 95%CI 1.451–10.357 P = 0.007) and CD56 positivity (HR 0.265 95%CI 0.100–0.705 P = 0.008) were independent predictors of overall survival.

Conclusions

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma is an aggressive clinical entity with a poor prognosis. Taking both the neuroendocrine component and the adenocarcinoma component into consideration of optimal treatment is strongly recommended.

Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors associated with gastroenteropancreatic mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) is low. To improve our understanding of this rare tumor type and optimally guide clinical treatment, associated risk factors, clinical manifestations, and prognosis must be explored.

AIM

To identify risk factors that influence the prognosis of patients with gastroenteropancreatic MiNEN (GEP-MiNEN).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 46 patients who were diagnosed with GEP-MiNEN at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (Anhui, China) between January 2013 and December 2017. Risk factors influencing the prognosis of the patients were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression models. We compared the results with 55 randomly selected patients with gastroenteropancreatic GEP neuroendocrine tumors, 47 with neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), and 58 with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Among the 46 patients with GEP-MiNEN, thirty-five had gastric tumors, nine had intestinal tumors (four in the small intestine and five in the colon and rectum), and two had pancreatic tumors. The median age of the patients was 66 (41-84) years, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.83. Thirty-three (71.7%) patients had clinical stage III and IV cancers. Distant metastasis occurred in 14 patients, of which 13 had metastasis to the liver. The follow-up period was 11-72 mo, and the median overall survival was 30 mo. Ki-67 index ≥ 50%, high proportion of NEC, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, and higher clinical stage were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with GEP-MiNEN. The median overall survival was shorter for patients with NEC than for those with MiNEN (14 mo vs 30 mo, P = 0.001), but did not significantly differ from those with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and MiNEN (30 mo vs 18 mo, P = 0.453).

CONCLUSION

A poor prognosis is associated with rare, aggressive GEP-MiNEN. Ki-67 index, tumor composition, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, and clinical stage are important factors for patient prognosis.

Chromosomal and molecular pathway alterations in the neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma components of gastric mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm

Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) is a clinically aggressive subtype of mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) with unclear clonal origin. In this study, we analyzed high-resolution copy number (CN) profiling data using the OncoScan CNV Assay in the neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and adenocarcinoma components of eight MANECs. Some common CNVs, including the gain of CCNE1 (19q12) and the loss of FAT1 (4q35.2), were frequently detected in both components; these CNVs were verified by FISH, qPCR and immunohistochemistry staining assays in samples with sufficient material. The identification of common CNVs in both components supports the likelihood of single clonal origin of morphologically heterogeneous tumor cells and suggests several novel genetic events potentially involved in the development of gastric MANEC. We also detected and validated some CNVs and alterations specific for the NEC component, such as MAPK1 loss and MAPK signaling pathway alterations, which could contribute to the neuroendocrine differentiation of gastric MANEC. In addition, we found that the NEC component presented more CNVs and greater CN loss than the adenocarcinoma component (P = 0.007 and P = 0.004, respectively); the NEC components from different cases were not clustered in the hierarchical clustering analysis, indicating the marked genetic heterogenicity of the NEC component in gastric MANEC. In summary, this study describes the cytogenetic characteristics of each component of gastric MANEC, providing some clues for further studies on the development and progression of gastric MANEC as well as providing some potential therapeutic targets.

Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare diagnosis of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. Evidence from the current literature regarding their epidemiology, biology, and management is of variable quality and conflicting. Based on available data, the MiNEN has an aggressive biological behaviour, mostly driven by its (often high-grade) neuroendocrine component, and a dismal prognosis. In most cases, the non-neuroendocrine component is of adenocarcinoma histology. Due to limitations in diagnostic methods and poor awareness within the scientific community, the incidence of MiNENs may be underestimated. In the absence of data from clinical trials, MiNENs are commonly treated according to the standard of care for pure neuroendocrine carcinomas or adenocarcinomas from the same sites of origin, based on the assumption of a biological similarity to their pure counterparts. However, little is known about the molecular aberrations of MiNENs, and their pathogenesis remains controversial; molecular/genetic studies conducted so far point towards a common monoclonal origin of the two components. In addition, mutations in tumour-associated genes, including TP53, BRAF, and KRAS, and microsatellite instability have emerged as potential drivers of MiNENs. This systematic review (91 full manuscripts or abstracts in English language) summarises the current reported literature on clinical, pathological, survival, and molecular/genetic data on MiNENs.

Retrospective study on mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms from five European centres

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare diagnosis, mainly encountered in the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. There is limited knowledge of its epidemiology, prognosis and biology, and the best management for affected patients is still to be defined.

AIM

To investigate clinical-pathological characteristics, treatment modalities and survival outcomes of a retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of MiNEN.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of MiNEN were identified at 5 European centres. Patient data were retrospectively collected from medical records. Pathological samples were reviewed to ascertain compliance with the 2017 World Health Organisation definition of MiNEN. Tumour responses to systemic treatment were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to estimate survival outcomes. Associations between clinical-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes were explored using Log-rank test for equality of survivors functions (univariate) and Cox-regression analysis (multivariable).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine consecutive patients identified; Median age at diagnosis: 64 years. Males: 63.8%. Localised disease (curable): 53.6%. Commonest sites of origin: colon-rectum (43.5%) and oesophagus/oesophagogastric junction (15.9%). The neuroendocrine component was; predominant in 58.6%, poorly differentiated in 86.3%, and large cell in 81.25%, of cases analysed. Most distant metastases analysed (73.4%) were occupied only by a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine component. Ninety-four percent of patients with localised disease underwent curative surgery; 53% also received perioperative treatment, most often in line with protocols for adenocarcinomas from the same sites of origin. Chemotherapy was offered to most patients (68.1%) with advanced disease, and followed protocols for pure neuroendocrine carcinomas or adenocarcinomas in equal proportion. In localised cases, median recurrence free survival (RFS); 14.0 months (95%CI: 9.2-24.4), and median overall survival (OS): 28.6 months (95%CI: 18.3-41.1). On univariate analysis, receipt of perioperative treatment (vs surgery alone) did not improve RFS (P = 0.375), or OS (P = 0.240). In advanced cases, median progression free survival (PFS); 5.6 months (95%CI: 4.4-7.4), and median OS; 9.0 months (95%CI: 5.2-13.4). On univariate analysis, receipt of palliative active treatment (vs best supportive care) prolonged PFS and OS (both, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MiNEN is most commonly driven by a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine component, and has poor prognosis. Advances in its biological understanding are needed to identify effective treatments and improve patient outcomes.

Efficacy of XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) is a rare neoplasm, and consensus on the treatment is unavailable.

PATIENT CONCERN

A 60-year-old Chinese man presented with obstructive symptoms while eating and paroxysmal stomach pain for more than a month.

DIAGNOSIS

MANEC was diagnosed based on clinical manifestations, imaging findings, and pathological examinations.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent radical gastrectomy and received XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy (oxaliplatin 200 mg day 1 + capecitabine 1.5 g twice a day) after surgery.

OUTCOMES

After 4 cycles of XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy were administered, abdominal computerized tomography and liver magnetic resonance showed liver metastasis.

LESSONS

The therapy of gastric MANEC is based on surgical operation, and adjuvant chemotherapy program has an important influence on its prognosis. Therefore, further studying the effectiveness of XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric MANEC is necessary.

Correlation of metastasis characteristics with prognosis in gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma: Two case reports

RATIONALE

This article is aimed to retrospect the clinicopathological data of 2 cases of gastric MANENCs. MANEC is a rare biphasic tumor type that is coexistence of dual neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma differentiation with each composing exceeding 30% volume. Gastric MANEC have just been reported anecdotally in the literature due to their rarity and heterogeneity. According to our study, these neoplasms have 3 different metastasis patterns: only adenocarcinomatous or neuroendocrine carcinoma and both of the 2 components. We first focus on the correlation of metastasis characteristics with prognosis in gastric MANEC, which may be potential implications for the choice of chemotherapy.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The 2 cases of patient shared several symptoms: epigastric discomfort, weight loss, hematemesis, or melena.

DIAGNOSIS

The 2 patients were diagnosis as MANEC based on the identification of histopathological analysis. In case 1, the poor differentiated adenocarcinoma accounted for 30%, the neuroendocrine part account for 70% and both of the 2 components metastasized to the lymph nodes, whereas in case 2, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma accounted for 70%, the neuroendocrine part for 30% and only the glandular component invaded regional lymph nodes.

INTERVENTIONS

The first patient underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, combination of cisplatin, and etoposide successfully. The second patient received radical gastronomy, and did not receive any chemotherapy due to general weakness.

OUTCOMES

The first patient is alive with no evidence of recurrence, and the second patient died 6 months after the operation.

LESSONS

The assessment of metastatic sites should be a routine pathological practice, which is crucial for clinical decision-making and the selection of management.

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MUCIN PHENOTYPE CAN PREDICT GASTRIC CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection is still considered an accepted treatment for early gastric cancer for selected cases. Histopathologic criteria for curative endoscopic resection are intramucosal well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, lateral and deep margins free of tumor, no histological ulceration, and no venous or lymphatic embolism. A 5% local recurrence rate has been described even when all the above-mentioned criteria are met. On the other hand, antigen expression by tumoral cells has been related to the biological behavior of several tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether early gastric cancer mucin immunoexpression, p53 and Ki-67, can predict recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection, even when standard histopathologic criteria for curative measures have been attempted.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with early gastric cancer were considered to have been completely resected by endoscopic mucosal resection. Local recurrence occurred in 5/22 (22.7%). Immunohistochemical study was possible in 18 (81.8%) resected specimens. Patients were divided in two groups: those with and those without local recurrence. They were compared across demographic, endoscopic, histologic data, and immunohistochemical factors for MUC2, MUC5a, CD10, p53, and Ki-67.

RESULTS

Mucin immunoexpression allowed a reclassification of gastric adenocarcinoma in intestinal (10), gastric (2), mixed (4), and null phenotypes (2). Mixed phenotype (positive for both MUC2 and MUC5a) was found in 80% of cases in the local recurrence group, while the intestinal type (positive MUC2 and negative MUC5a) was found in 76.9% of cases without local recurrence (P=0.004). Other observed features did not correlate with neoplastic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The mixed phenotype of early gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with a higher probability of local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection.