Somatostatin receptor SSTR2A and SSTR5 expression in neuroendocrine breast cancer

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a review of literature

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast are characterized by neuroendocrine architectural and cytological features, which must be supported by immunohistochemical positivity for neuroendocrine markers (such as Chromogranin and Synaptophysin). According to the literature, making a diagnosis of primary neuroendocrine breast cancer always needs to rule out a possible primary neuroendocrine neoplasm from another site. Currently, the latest 2022 version of the WHO of endocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms has classified breast NENs as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), differentiating them from invasive breast cancers of no special type (IBCs-NST). with neuroendocrine features. The current review article describes six cases from our series and a comprehensive review of the literature in the field of NENs of the breast.

Case Report: Extensive Tumor Profiling in Primary Neuroendocrine Breast Cancer Cases as a Role Model for Personalized Treatment in Rare and Aggressive Cancer Types

Neuroendocrine breast cancer (NEBC) is a rare entity accounting for <0.1% of all breast carcinomas and <0.1% of all neuroendocrine carcinomas. In most cases treatment strategies in NEBC are empirical in absence of prospective trial data on NEBC cohorts. Herein, we present two case reports diagnosed with anaplastic and small cell NEBC. After initial therapies failed, comprehensive tumor profiling was applied, leading to individualized treatment options for both patients. In both patients, targetable alterations of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway were found, including a PIK3CA mutation itself and an STK11 mutation that negatively regulates the mTOR complex. The epicrisis of the two patients exemplifies how to manage rare and difficult to treat cancers and how new diagnostic tools contribute to medical management.

Invasive Breast Carcinoma with Neuroendocrine Differentiation: A Single-Center Analysis of Clinical Features and Prognosis

Introduction Invasive breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation is a rare subtype of breast malignancy. Due to frequent changes in the definition of these lesions, the correct diagnosis, estimation of exact prevalence, and clinical behaviour of this entity may be challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, clinical features, and outcomes in a large cohort of patients with breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation.

Patients Twenty-seven cases of breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation have been included in this analysis. Twenty-one cases were identified by systematic immunohistochemical re-evaluation of 465 breast cancer specimens using the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin, resulting in a prevalence of 4.5%. A further six cases were identified by a review of clinical records.

Results Median age at the time of diagnosis was 61 years. 70% of patients had T2 – 4 tumors and 37% were node-positive. The most common immunohistochemical subtype was HR-positive/HER2-negative (85%). 93% were positive for synaptophysin and 48% for chromogranin A. Somatostatin receptor type 2A status was positive in 12 of 24 analyzed tumors (50%). Neuroendocrine-specific treatment with somatostatin analogues was administered in two patients. The 5-year survival rate was 70%.

Conclusions Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation is mostly HR-positive/HER2-negative and the diagnosis is made at a higher TNM stage than in patients with conventional invasive breast carcinoma. Moreover, breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation was found to be associated with impaired prognosis in several retrospective trials. Due to somatostatin receptor 2A expression, somatostatin receptor-based imaging can be used and somatostatin receptor-targeted therapy can be offered in selected cases.

The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast and its clinical relevance

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast (Br-NENs) are rare tumors of the mammary gland. Their definition and classification have been a matter of discussion for more than half a century, as they present some degree of overlap with other malignancies in the mammary gland. The recent evolutions in the understanding of the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) as well as the novel tools in the diagnostic arsenal of the pathologists, and a better correlation with clinical data, have led to improved classification schemes for these entities, beginning from those arising in digestive and thoracic organs. These new classification concepts have been recently expanded to NENs arising in every anatomical site, with the proposal of a common classification framework that has been applied in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of tumors. These concepts include the recognition of two distinct families of NENs (neuroendocrine tumors, NETs, and neuroendocrine carcinomas, NECs), the identification of mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, and the application of definite morphological and immunohistochemical criteria for the diagnosis of NENs. The last WHO classification of Br-NENs, however, still seems to leave several unanswered questions and unmet needs in the understanding of diagnostic and clinical features of these entities. This review will critically revise the current classification of Br-NENs, underlining its lights and shadows and focusing on the identification of diagnostic histopathological criteria that can help the univocal recognition of Br-NET, Br-NEC, and Br-MiNEN.

Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: lights and shadows

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic proliferations showing different morphological features, immunophenotype, molecular background, clinical presentation, and outcome. They can virtually originate in every organ of the human body and their classification is not uniform among different sites. Indeed, as they have historically been classified according to the organ in which they primarily arise, the different nomenclature that has resulted have created some confusion among pathologists and clinicians. Although a uniform terminology to classify neuroendocrine neoplasms arising in different systems has recently been proposed by WHO/IARC, some issues remain unsolved or need to be clarified. In this review, we discuss the lights and shadows of the current WHO classifications used to define and characterize NENs of the pituitary gland, lung, breast and those of the head and neck region, and digestive and urogenital systems.

S-1 plus temozolomide as second-line treatment for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast: A case report

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (NECB) is a rare type of malignant tumor. Due to the rarity of NECB, the relevant literature mostly comprises case reports. Available data on treatment options for NECB are very limited.

CASE SUMMARY

A 62-year-old woman presented to our hospital in October 2016 for intermittent vomiting and diarrhea and masses in the liver found on abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging. She was diagnosed in July 2012 with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the right breast in local hospital. The patient initially presented with a painful lesion of the right breast. She then undergone surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with pirarubicin and paclitaxel for four cycles as well as endocrine therapy. She was regularly followed every 3 mo after surgery. Enhanced abdominal CT imaging at our hospital revealed multiple suspicious masses in the liver with the largest lesion measuring 8.4 cm × 6.3 cm. Chest CT revealed masses in the anterior chest wall and lung. Core needle biopsy of the lesion revealed liver metastases of NECB. A bone scan showed right second anterior rib metastases. Upper endoscopy and colonoscopy did not provide any evidence of another possible primary tumor. She stopped receiving endocrine therapy and then received etoposide and cisplatin (EP) chemotherapy as a first-line treatment regimen for six cycles at our hospital after liver, bone, and lung metastases. On October 2017, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to S-1 (40 mg twice daily, days 1-14) combined with temozolomide (200 mg once daily, days 10-14) (STEM) every 21 d as a second-line treatment regimen due to disease progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effects after treatment were analyzed, and the efficacy of the STEM regimen was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. This patient achieved a partial response after using the STEM regimen, with a PFS of 23 mo. Adverse effects included only grade 1 digestive tract reactions with no need for a reduction in chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This case report suggests that the STEM regimen may be effective and well tolerated as the second-line treatment for advanced NECB. STEM is still highly effective in patients who show disease progression with the EP regimen. More evidence is needed to prove the validity of STEM.

Theranostic Approach in Breast Cancer: A Treasured Tailor for Future Oncology

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is the most frequent invasive malignancy and the second major cause of cancer death in female subjects mostly due to the considerable diagnostic delay and failure of therapeutic strategies. Thus, early diagnosis and possibility to monitor response to the treatment are of utmost importance. Identification of valid biomarkers, in particular new molecular therapeutic targets, that would allow screening, early patient identification, prediction of disease aggressiveness, and monitoring response to the therapeutic regimen has been in the focus of breast cancer research during recent decades. One of the intensively developing fields is nuclear medicine combining molecular diagnostic imaging and subsequent (radio)therapy in the light of theranostics. This review aimed to survey the current status of preclinical and clinical research using theranostic approach in breast cancer patients with potential to translate into conventional treatment strategies alone or in combination with other common treatments, especially in aggressive and resistant types of breast cancer. In addition, we present 5 patients with breast cancer who were refractory or relapsed after conventional therapy while presumably responded to the molecular radiotherapy with 177Lu-trastuzumab (Herceptin), 177Lu-DOTATATE, and 177Lu-FAPI-46.

On the Endless Dilemma of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: a Journey Through Concepts and Entities

Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast carcinomas has been a matter of discussion since it was first described almost 60 years ago. Indeed, so-called neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast (Br-NENs) are a less well-defined group of neoplasms than analogous entities in other anatomic sites, such as the lung and the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract. Pure neuroendocrine phenotype is extremely rare, whereas the expression of neuroendocrine markers in usual breast carcinomas, both of special and of non-special type, without evident neuroendocrine morphology, is more common. In this context, the diagnostic criteria and the classification scheme for Br-NENs have been continuously changing over time and real consensus on this topic is still lacking, despite the recent publication of the 5th edition of the WHO classification of breast tumors. In this review, we will recapitulate the evolution of the concept of Br-NEN; revise the available knowledge on their morphological, molecular, and clinical features; and critically discuss the current classification scheme.

Investigation of somatostatin receptor profile of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast

Carcinomas of the breast with neuroendocrine features are rare primary neoplasms positive for neuroendocrine markers. According to the WHO classification of tumours of the breast they are divided into three morphologically distinct categories. They comprise neuroendocrine tumour (NET), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (NED). The purpose of this study was to investigate for the first time the full spectrum of sstr expression status in breast carcinomas with neuroendocrine features. Fifteen primary breast carcinomas with histological and immunohistochemical neuroendocrine features were studied. Four of them were classified as NETs and two as NECs, and the remaining 9 as carcinomas with NED. All six types of somatostatin receptor (sstr) types (sstr1, sstr 2A, sstr2B, sstr3, sstr4 and sstr5) were investigated by immunohistochemistry. To assess the distribution and intensity of membranous receptor immunoreactivity, a four-scale scoring system was used. Overall predominant receptors were sstr2A, sstr2B, sstr3 and sstr5 showing the highest membranous staining scores 3+ and 2 + . The sstr1 was not detected. Given that carcinomas with neuroendocrine features represent distinct entities, patients with such tumours may benefit from sstr targeting therapies. Immunohistochemistry for sstrs can predict the effectiveness of administration of SST analogues to those patients, thus contributing to achieve the maximum therapeutic outcome, particularly in NETs and NECs with scores 2+ and 3 + .

Prognostic impact of somatostatin receptor expression in advanced bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) recently have been identified as potential targets for treatment of solid tumors. Furthermore, they have been shown to be of high relevance for tumor biology and prognosis in various types of cancer. However, there is a lack of clinical data for SSTR in bladder cancer (BC). Aim of this study was to determine the expression of all relevant somatostatin receptor subtypes in benign urothelium and tumor tissue of patients with muscle invasive BC. Furthermore, their potential role as prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated.

METHODS

The collective included BC and benign urothelium tissue of 103 patients (Median age 69; range 32-84, 79 male, 24 female) who underwent a radical cystectomy. A tissue microarray with subsequent immunohistochemical staining was used to assess membranous expression of SSTR1-5. Results were correlated to clinical and histopathological data as well as CSS and OS.

RESULTS

Expressions of SSTR1-4 were significantly decreased in BC compared to benign urothelium (P < 0.002 each), whereas SSTR5 expression was increased (P = 0.0017). Expression of SSTR1 was associated with organ-confined disease (≤pT2) (P = 0.0477). No correlation between SSTR1-5 expression and N- and M-stage was observed. Univariate analyses showed a significantly longer CSS and OS in patients with high expression of SSTR3 (P = 0.0316 and 0.0044). Multivariate analyses confirmed SSTR3 expression as independent marker of improved CSS and OS (P = 0.0324 and 0.0076).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of somatostatin receptor subtypes exhibit decreased expression in BC compared to benign bladder tissue. Expression of SSTR3 is an indicator for favorable prognosis in patients with muscle-invasive BC. These results support preclinical investigations using somatostatin receptor analogues such as octreotide to influence BC growth.

Neuroendocrine breast carcinoma: a rare but challenging entity

Breast carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, also known as neuroendocrine breast carcinoma (NEBC), includes a heterogeneous group of rare tumors, which account for 2–5% of all invasive breast carcinomas. Because of their low incidence, most of the current limited knowledge of these tumors derives from anecdotal case reports or small retrospective series. The diagnosis of NEBC is based on the presence of morphological features similar to gastrointestinal and lung NETs and neuroendocrine markers. NEBCs are usually hormone receptors positive and HER2 negative, but despite this luminal phenotype, most recent studies suggested that NEBC could be associated with worse prognosis compared to invasive breast cancer without neuroendocrine differentiation. Due to its rarity and lack of randomized data, there is little evidence to guide the choice of treatment, so NEBC is currently treated as any invasive breast carcinoma not-otherwise specified. Recently, attempts to molecularly characterize NEBC have been made, in order to provide new targets for a more personalized treatment of this uncommon entity.

177Lu-DOTATOC Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in a Patient With Neuroendocrine Breast Carcinoma and Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs for somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted imaging and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) have demonstrated remarkable success in the management of SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine neoplasms. Primary neuroendocrine breast carcinoma is rare. Heterogeneous SSTR overexpression has also been documented in breast cancer, in both human breast cancer specimens and clinical studies. We report here a case of a 69-year-old woman who had both breast invasive ductal carcinoma and primary large-cell neuroendocrine breast carcinoma (Ki-67 proliferation index of 20%), with disseminated bone and lymph node metastases, demonstrating exceptional tracer uptake on Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, and remarkably partial remission after Lu-DOTATOC PRRT.

Ultrasonic-Assisted Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis of DOTA-TATE and DOTA-linker-TATE Derivatives as a Simple and Low-Cost Method for the Facile Synthesis of Chelator-Peptide Conjugates

Peptides have been widely adopted as biological targeting vectors for applications in molecular imaging and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Somatostatin (SST) analogues such as octreotate (TATE) are exogenous ligands for somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), which are highly expressed on neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, both [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE (NETSPOT) and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (LUTATHERA) received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and PRRT of NETs, respectively. However, to the best of our knowledge a well-described synthesis of DOTA-TATE has not been reported in the literature. Herein, we report a fully reoptimized DOTA-TATE synthesis, including the application of a simple ultrasonic bath to greatly improve yields, reduce coupling times, and decrease the amount of reagents required for each coupling step by a half. The most prevalently used cyclizing agents such as iodine, thallium(III) trifluoroacetate, hydrogen peroxide, and dimethyl sulfoxide were compared. On-resin cyclizations using mechanical agitation showed higher yields (23% and 25% using I₂ and Tl(III), respectively) than off-resin (1.3% and 11% using DMSO and H₂O₂, respectively), and the total synthesis time of DOTA-TATE was ∼540 min excluding the cyclization step, with a total synthesis yield of ∼23%. The same manual SPPS methods/reagents were reoptimized with ultrasonic (US) agitation, resulting in an immense reduction in the total synthesis time by ∼8-fold to ∼70 min for DOTA-TATE with a higher yield (∼29% yield), and ∼13-fold to 105 min for DOTA-PEG₄-TATE (∼29% yield). Also, the use of US agitation reduces the need for excess molar equivalents of the reagents to a half, which is particularly important when coupling expensive or custom-synthesized groups such as bifunctional chelators and linkers. Finally, the synthesized DOTA-TATE was successfully radiolabeled with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga³⁺ (t_1/2 = 68 min) with high radiochemical yields (30 min, 95 °C). We believe this work opens the door to the facile and low-cost synthesis of many new chelator-linker-peptide conjugates that were previously cumbersome or cost-prohibitive to produce with manual SPPS.

Neuroendocrine Cancer of the Breast: A Rare Entity

Neuroendocrine breast cancer (NEBC) is a rare histotype of breast carcinoma that presents, in most cases, positive hormone receptors and negative HER2. Indeed, the analysis of gene expression profiles revealed that NEBC belongs mainly to the luminal subtype. Cases of HER2-positive and triple-negative NEBC are rare. The cardinal treatment of early NEBC is surgery, similar to the treatment of invasive non-special histological type carcinoma. The use of radiotherapy follows the criteria applied in infiltrating breast cancer of non-special histotype. In the post-operative phase, therefore after the surgical treatment of mammary quadrantectomy, or mastectomy associated with homolateral sentinel lymph node removal ± axillary dissection, based on the histopathological characteristics of the tumor, the use of chemotherapy (anthracycline + taxane) and/or hormone therapy, whether or not associated with anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab) is the rule. Literature data report the use of cisplatin and etoposide, as in small cell lung cancers. Most of the information currently available derive from single case reports or a series of clinical cases; it follows the difficulty of formulating definite recommendations on the correct management of this histological type of breast cancer. This review describes available knowledge on this rare entity to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and offer insights to stimulate exploration of the many aspects still unknown.