1
|
Nogueira LM, May FP, Yabroff KR, Siegel RL. Racial Disparities in Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1368-1377. [PMID: 37939323 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Young individuals racialized as Black are more likely to die after a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis than individuals racialized as White in the United States. This study examined racial disparities in receipt of timely and guideline-concordant care among individuals racialized as Black and White with early-onset CRC. METHODS Individuals age 18-49 years racialized as non-Hispanic Black and White (self-identified) and newly diagnosed with CRC during 2004-2019 were selected from the National Cancer Database. Patients who received recommended care (staging, surgery, lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) were considered to have received guideline-concordant care. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age and sex. The decomposition method was used to estimate the relative contribution of demographic characteristics (age and sex), comorbidities, health insurance, and facility type to the racial disparity in receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method was used to evaluate differences in time to treatment between patients racialized as Black and White. RESULTS Of the 84,882 patients with colon cancer and 62,573 patients with rectal cancer, 20.8% and 14.5% were racialized as Black, respectively. Individuals racialized as Black were more likely to not receive guideline-concordant care for colon (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.22]) and rectal (aOR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.33]) cancers. Health insurance explained 28.2% and 21.6% of the disparity among patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. Individuals racialized as Black had increased time to adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.24 to 1.32]) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.37 to 1.47]) compared with individuals racialized as White. CONCLUSION Patients with early-onset CRC racialized as Black receive worse and less timely care than individuals racialized as White. Health insurance, a modifiable factor, was the largest contributor to racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia M Nogueira
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Folasade P May
- Department of Medicine, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jafari MD, Mesiti A, Brouwer J, McKinney C, Wenzel LB, Pigazzi A, Zell JA. Attitudes of physicians and patients toward immediate and intraoperative chemotherapy treatment in colon cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2024; 39:100798. [PMID: 38447475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We have shown in a Phase I trial that immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) during surgical resection and immediately postoperative is safe and feasible in patients with colon cancer (CC). IAC avoids delays in adjuvant treatment and has the potential to improve survival and quality of life. We aim to determine patients and providers attitudes toward this novel multidisciplinary treatment approach. METHODS Two web-based surveys were administered to newly diagnosed CC patients, survivors, surgeons and oncologists. Surveys assessed treatment preferences and perceived barriers to IAC. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare differences between patients' and providers' responses. RESULTS Responses were collected from 35 patients and 40 providers. Patients were more willing to: (1) proceed with IAC to finish treatment earlier thus possibly improving quality of life (p = 0.001); (2) proceed with IAC despite potential side effects (p < 0.001); and (3) proceed with a dose of intraoperative chemotherapy even if on final pathology, may not have been needed (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to indicate no barriers to collaborative care (p = 0.001) while providers were more likely to cite that it is time consuming, thus a barrier to participation (p = 0.001), has scheduling challenges (p = 0.001), and physicians are not available to participate (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS We observed a discordance between what providers and patients value in perioperative and adjuvant CC treatment. Patients are willing to accept IAC despite potential side effects and without survival benefit, highlighting the importance of understanding patient preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehraneh D Jafari
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Surgery, 525 E 68th Street, K802, New York, NY 10065, United States; Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - Andrea Mesiti
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Surgery, 525 E 68th Street, K802, New York, NY 10065, United States.
| | - Julianna Brouwer
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Surgery, 525 E 68th Street, K802, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Chelsea McKinney
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| | - Lari B Wenzel
- Department of Medicine, UC Irvine, United States; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Surgery, 525 E 68th Street, K802, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Jason A Zell
- Department of Medicine, UC Irvine, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beauharnais CC, Crawford A, Springer JE, Sturrock PR, Davids JS, Maykel JA, Alavi K. Racial disparities in survival of early onset colon cancer (Age<50): A matched NCDB analysis. Am J Surg 2024; 228:141-145. [PMID: 37718168 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-onset colon cancer (EOCC) has increasing incidence and disproportionately affects African-Americans. This analysis aims to compare EOCC survival among Black and White patients after matching relevant socio-demographic factors and stage. METHODS The 2004-2017 NCDB database was queried for Black and White patients, age<50, who underwent colectomy for adenocarcinoma. A one-to-one match on race was performed based on sociodemographic factors and disease stage (I-IV). Five-year survival differences were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS 5322 Black-White matched pairs were analyzed. Compared to White patients, Black patients averaged more days to surgery (19 ± 68 vs 16 days ± 32, p < 0.001) and to chemotherapy (63 ± 8 vs. 57 ± 39, p < 0.001). Black stage III patients were 20% less likely to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p = 0.0006), and had a 17% increased rate of death (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.0-1.3, p = 0.01) after adjusting for sex, comorbidity score, tumor location and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Black patients with stage 3 EOCC are less likely to receive chemotherapy and have worse survival. Further evaluation is warranted to identify potential factors driving these observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine C Beauharnais
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, UMASS Memorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA; UMASS Chan Medical School, United States.
| | | | - Jeremy E Springer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, UMASS Memorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA; UMASS Chan Medical School, United States
| | - Paul R Sturrock
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, UMASS Memorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA; UMASS Chan Medical School, United States
| | - Jennifer S Davids
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, UMASS Memorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA; UMASS Chan Medical School, United States
| | - Justin A Maykel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, UMASS Memorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA; UMASS Chan Medical School, United States
| | - Karim Alavi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, UMASS Memorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA; UMASS Chan Medical School, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frieder JS, Montorfano L, De Stefano F, Ortiz Gomez C, Ferri F, Liang H, Gilshtein H, Rosenthal RJ, Wexner SD, Sharp SP. A National Inpatient Sample Analysis of Racial Disparities After Segmental Colectomy for Inflammatory Colorectal Diseases. Am Surg 2023; 89:5131-5139. [PMID: 36349487 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221138085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial disparities and poor access to care are common among African Americans (AA), potentially adversely affecting surgical outcomes in inflammatory bowel conditions. We aimed to analyze the effect of race on outcomes in patients undergoing segmental colectomy for inflammatory bowel conditions. METHODS Retrospective review of data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2010 and 2015 identified patients who underwent segmental colectomy without ostomy for Crohn's or diverticular disease. AA patients were compared with Caucasians using a multivariable analysis model. Primary outcomes of interest were overall complications, mortality, and extended hospital stay. RESULTS 38,143 admissions were analyzed; AA patients constituted 8% of the overall cohort. Diagnoses included Crohn's (11%) and diverticular disease (89%). After multivariable analysis, AA patients had significantly higher overall risk of complications (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.40) and extended hospital stay (OR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.45-1.75) than Caucasians. On bivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in mortality between AA and Caucasian patients. AA patients had significantly higher rates of Medicaid insurance (14% vs 6%, P < .001), lower rates of private insurance (35% vs 47%, P < .001), and were less likely to undergo surgery at a private hospital (31% vs 41%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AA patients requiring segmental colectomy for inflammatory colorectal conditions experience significantly higher rates of postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and lower rates of private insurance. Direct correlation between insurance status and postoperative outcomes could not be established, but we speculate such great disparity in outcomes may stem from these socioeconomic differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Hong Liang
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | | | - Raul J Rosenthal
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL USA
| | | | - Stephen P Sharp
- Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center West Hospital, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Watson KS, Tossas KY, San Miguel Y, Gastala N, San Miguel LG, Grumeretz S, Henderson V, Winn R, Jimbo M, Naylor KB, Gregory ME, Molina Y, Hughes AM. Mi-CARE: Comparing Three Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening among Ethnic Minorities within Three Different Clinical Contexts. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:7049. [PMID: 37998280 PMCID: PMC10671818 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20227049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have been developed to improve the completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and other safety net settings in marginalized communities. Little effort has been made, however, to evaluate their relative effectiveness across different clinical contexts and populations. To this end, we tested the relative effectiveness of three EBIs (mailed birthday cards, lay navigation, and provider-delivered education) among a convenience sample of 1252 patients (aged 50-75 years old, who were due for CRC screening and scheduled for a visit at one of three clinics within a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in the United States. To be eligible for the study, patients had to identify as African American (AA) or Latino American (LA). We compared the effects of the three EBIs on CRC screening completion using logistic regression. Overall, 20% of the study population, an increase from a baseline of 13%, completed CRC screening. Clinical demographics appeared to influence the effectiveness of the EBIs. Mailed birthday reminders appeared to be the most effective within the multi-ethnic clinic (p = 0.03), provider-delivered education within the predominantly LA clinic (p = 0.02), and lay navigation within the predominantly AA clinic (p = 0.03). These findings highlight the importance of understanding clinical context when selecting which evidence-based interventions to deploy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karriem S. Watson
- National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
| | - Katherine Y. Tossas
- VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, 417 N 11th St., Richmond, VA 23219, USA; (K.Y.T.); (R.W.)
| | - Yazmin San Miguel
- Abbott Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL 60064, USA;
| | - Nicole Gastala
- Hospital & Health Sciences Systems Mile Square Health Center, University of Illinois, 1220 S Wood St. M/C 698; Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Liliana G. San Miguel
- Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, 1603 W Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (L.G.S.M.); (Y.M.)
| | - Scott Grumeretz
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois, SRH MC 709, 818 South Wolcott Avenue, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Vida Henderson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N. M3-B232, Seattle, WA 98109, USA;
| | - Robert Winn
- VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, 417 N 11th St., Richmond, VA 23219, USA; (K.Y.T.); (R.W.)
| | - Masahito Jimbo
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor Street, MC 663, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Keith B. Naylor
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., 718E CSB (MC 716), Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Megan E. Gregory
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA;
| | - Yamilé Molina
- Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, 1603 W Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (L.G.S.M.); (Y.M.)
| | - Ashley M. Hughes
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, School of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor Street MC 530, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
- Center for Innovation for Chronic, Complex Healthcare, Edward Hines JR VA Hospital, 5000 South 5th Avenue, Bldg 1, Hines, IL 60141, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rutter CM, Nascimento de Lima P, Maerzluft CE, May FP, Murphy CC. Black-White disparities in colorectal cancer outcomes: a simulation study of screening benefit. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2023; 2023:196-203. [PMID: 37947338 PMCID: PMC10637026 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The US Black population has higher colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates and worse CRC survival than the US White population, as well as historically lower rates of CRC screening. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results incidence rate data in people diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 45 years, before routine CRC screening is recommended, were analyzed to estimate temporal changes in CRC risk in Black and White populations. There was a rapid rise in rectal and distal colon cancer incidence in the White population but not the Black population, and little change in proximal colon cancer incidence for both groups. In 2014-2018, CRC incidence per 100 000 was 17.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.3 to 19.9) among Black individuals aged 40-44 years and 16.6 (95% CI = 15.6 to 17.6) among White individuals aged 40-44 years; 42.3% of CRCs diagnosed in Black patients were proximal colon cancer, and 41.1% of CRCs diagnosed in White patients were rectal cancer. Analyses used a race-specific microsimulation model to project screening benefits, based on life-years gained and lifetime reduction in CRC incidence, assuming these Black-White differences in CRC risk and location. The projected benefits of screening (via either colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical testing) were greater in the Black population, suggesting that observed Black-White differences in CRC incidence are not driven by differences in risk. Projected screening benefits were sensitive to survival assumptions made for Black populations. Building racial disparities in survival into the model reduced projected screening benefits, which can bias policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn M Rutter
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Christopher E Maerzluft
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Folasade P May
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Castelo M, Paszat L, Hansen BE, Scheer AS, Faught N, Nguyen L, Baxter NN. Comparing Time to Diagnosis and Treatment Between Younger and Older Adults With Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:1152-1164. [PMID: 36841489 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Younger adults (aged <50 years) with colorectal cancer (CRC) may have prolonged delays to diagnosis and treatment that are associated with adverse outcomes. We compared delay intervals by age for patients with CRC in a large population. METHODS This was a population-based study of adults diagnosed with CRC in Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2018. We measured the time between presentation and diagnosis (diagnostic interval), diagnosis and treatment start (treatment interval), and the time from presentation to treatment (overall interval). We compared interval lengths between adults aged <50 years, 50 to 74 years, and 75 to 89 years using multivariable quantile regression. RESULTS Included were 90,225 patients with CRC. Of these, 6853 patients (7.6%) were aged <50 years. Younger patients were more likely to be women, present emergently, have stage IV disease, and have rectal cancer compared with middle-aged patients. Factors associated with significantly longer overall intervals included female sex (8.7 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6-10.9 days) and rectal cancer compared with proximal colon cancer (9.8 days; 95% CI, 7.4-2.2 days). After adjustment, adults aged <50 years had significantly longer diagnostic intervals (4.3 days; 95% CI. 1.3-7.3 days) and significantly shorter treatment intervals (-4.5 days; 95% CI, -5.3 to -3.7 days) compared with middle-aged patients. However, there was no significant difference in the overall interval (-0.6 days; 95% CI, -4.3 to 3.2 days). In stratified models, younger adults with stage IV disease who presented emergently and patients aged >75 years had longer overall intervals. CONCLUSIONS Younger adults present more often with stage IV CRC but have overall similar times from presentation to treatment as screening-eligible older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Castelo
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Paszat
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adena S Scheer
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Greenberg AL, Brand NR, Zambeli-Ljepović A, Barnes KE, Chiou SH, Rhoads KF, Adam MA, Sarin A. Exploring the complexity and spectrum of racial/ethnic disparities in colon cancer management. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:68. [PMID: 37060065 PMCID: PMC10105474 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01883-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality across U.S. racial/ethnic groups. Existing studies often focus on a particular race/ethnicity or single domain within the care continuum. Granular exploration of disparities among different racial/ethnic groups across the entire colon cancer care continuum is needed. We aimed to characterize differences in colon cancer outcomes by race/ethnicity across each stage of the care continuum. METHODS We used the 2010-2017 National Cancer Database to examine differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity across six domains: clinical stage at presentation; timing of surgery; access to minimally invasive surgery; post-operative outcomes; utilization of chemotherapy; and cumulative incidence of death. Analysis was via multivariable logistic or median regression, with select demographics, hospital factors, and treatment details as covariates. RESULTS 326,003 patients (49.6% female, 24.0% non-White, including 12.7% Black, 6.1% Hispanic/Spanish, 1.3% East Asian, 0.9% Southeast Asian, 0.4% South Asian, 0.3% AIAE, and 0.2% NHOPI) met inclusion criteria. Relative to non-Hispanic White patients: Southeast Asian (OR 1.39, p < 0.01), Hispanic/Spanish (OR 1.11 p < 0.01), and Black (OR 1.09, p < 0.01) patients had increased odds of presenting with advanced clinical stage. Southeast Asian (OR 1.37, p < 0.01), East Asian (OR 1.27, p = 0.05), Hispanic/Spanish (OR 1.05 p = 0.02), and Black (OR 1.05, p < 0.01) patients had increased odds of advanced pathologic stage. Black patients had increased odds of experiencing a surgical delay (OR 1.33, p < 0.01); receiving non-robotic surgery (OR 1.12, p < 0.01); having post-surgical complications (OR 1.29, p < 0.01); initiating chemotherapy more than 90 days post-surgery (OR 1.24, p < 0.01); and omitting chemotherapy altogether (OR 1.12, p = 0.05). Black patients had significantly higher cumulative incidence of death at every pathologic stage relative to non-Hispanic White patients when adjusting for non-modifiable patient factors (p < 0.05, all stages), but these differences were no longer statistically significant when also adjusting for modifiable factors such as insurance status and income. CONCLUSIONS Non-White patients disproportionately experience advanced stage at presentation. Disparities for Black patients are seen across the entire colon cancer care continuum. Targeted interventions may be appropriate for some groups; however, major system-level transformation is needed to address disparities experienced by Black patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anya L Greenberg
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16Th Street, 6Th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Nathan R Brand
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16Th Street, 6Th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Alan Zambeli-Ljepović
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16Th Street, 6Th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Katherine E Barnes
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16Th Street, 6Th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Sy Han Chiou
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16Th Street, 6Th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Kim F Rhoads
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mohamed A Adam
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16Th Street, 6Th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Ankit Sarin
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16Th Street, 6Th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mesiti AM, Brouwer J, Jafari MD, Qiu Y, Wenzel L, Carmichael J, McKinney C, Zell JA, Pigazzi A. Assessment of Attitudes Toward Initiation of Immediate Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer. J Surg Res 2023; 283:658-665. [PMID: 36455419 PMCID: PMC10681158 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early initiation of chemotherapy after surgery for colon cancer has survival benefits. Immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) involves giving chemotherapy during surgical resection and immediately postoperatively. This novel approach has been shown to be safe, eliminating delays in adjuvant treatment that could increase the risk of micro-metastatic spread. The aim of this study was to assess the willingness of the general public to accept IAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between March and April 2021, 800 telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of adult New York State residents. The Survey Research Institute of Cornell University conducted all surveys. Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared, and Fisher's tests were conducted using R 4.0.2. RESULTS Three scenarios were presented: (1) receiving IAC resulting in improved survival and quality of life, (2) finishing chemotherapy earlier without survival impact, and (3) finishing chemotherapy earlier but with possible side effects. Respondents with higher education were more likely to accept (1) & (2), males were more likely to accept (2) & (3), higher income respondents were more likely to accept (1) & (3), and those with more work hours were more likely to accept (2). Lastly, 16% responded they would be very or extremely likely, and 52% respondents would be somewhat likely or likely to accept intraoperative chemotherapy, even if it may not be necessary. CONCLUSIONS Respondents were likely to accept IAC if offered. Given the known risk of delayed adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colon cancer, further research is warranted to determine the survival and quality of life (QOL) benefits of IAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yuqing Qiu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, New York, New York
| | - Lari Wenzel
- UC Irvine Department of Medicine, Orange, California; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Irvine Medical Center 101 The City Drive South, Orange, California
| | - Joseph Carmichael
- University Of California - Irvine, Dept of Surgery, Orange, California
| | - Chelsea McKinney
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Irvine Medical Center 101 The City Drive South, Orange, California
| | - Jason A Zell
- UC Irvine Department of Medicine, Orange, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gbolahan O, Hashemi‐Sadraei N, Yash S, Williams G, Ramachandran R, Kim Y, Paluri R, Outlaw D, El‐Rayes B, Nabell L. Time to treatment initiation and its impact on real-world survival in metastatic colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:3488-3498. [PMID: 35979540 PMCID: PMC9939095 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the dearth of data regarding the time to treatment initiation (TTI) in the palliative setting, and its impact on survival outcomes, we sought to determine TTI in a real-world cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) patients and evaluate the impact of TTI on real-world survival outcomes. METHODS We collected survival and treatment data for mCRC and mPC from the Flatiron Health electronic health records (EHR) derived database. We divided TTI into 3 categories: < 2 weeks, 2-< 4 weeks, and 4-8 weeks, from diagnosis to first-line therapy. Outcome measures were median TTI, real-world overall survival (RW-OS) based on TTI categories by Kaplan-Meier method, and impact of TTI on survival using cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Among 7108 and 3231 patients with mCRC and mPC treated within 8 weeks of diagnosis, the median TTI were 28 days and 20 days. Median RW-OS for mCRC was 24 months; 26.9 months versus 22.6 and 18.05 months in the 4-8-week, 2-< 4 week (control) and < 2-week groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). For mPC, median RW-OS was 8 months, without significant difference in RW-OS among the groups (p = 0.05). The 4-8-week group was associated with lower hazard of death (HR 0.782, 95% CI 0.73-0.84, p < 0.0001) and the < 2-week group was associated with a higher hazard of death (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38, p < 0.0001) in mCRC. The 4-8-week group was associated with lower hazard of death for mPC (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.8-0.97, p = 0.0094). CONCLUSION In a real-world cohort of patients treated within 8 weeks of diagnosis, and with the limitations of a retrospective study, later TTI did not have a negative impact on survival outcomes in mCRC and mPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olumide Gbolahan
- Birmingham School of Medicine and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | | | - Suri Yash
- Birmingham School of Medicine and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Grant Williams
- Birmingham School of Medicine and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Rekha Ramachandran
- Division of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Alabama School of MedicineBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Young‐il Kim
- Division of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Alabama School of MedicineBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Ravikumar Paluri
- Birmingham School of Medicine and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
- Wake Forest School of MedicineNorth CarolinaUnited States
| | - Darryl Outlaw
- Birmingham School of Medicine and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Bassel El‐Rayes
- Emory University School of Medicine, and Winship Cancer InstituteGeorgia
| | - Lisle Nabell
- Birmingham School of Medicine and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Castelo M, Sue-Chue-Lam C, Paszat L, Scheer AS, Hansen BE, Kishibe T, Baxter NN. Clinical Delays and Comparative Outcomes in Younger and Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:8609-8625. [PMID: 36421332 PMCID: PMC9689013 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Outcome disparities between adults <50 with colorectal cancer (CRC) and older adults may be explained by clinical delays. This study synthesized the literature comparing delays and outcomes between younger and older adults with CRC. Databases were searched until December 2021. We included studies published after 1990 reporting delay in adults <50 that made comparisons to older adults. Comparisons were described narratively and stage between age groups was meta-analyzed. 39 studies were included representing 185,710 younger CRC patients and 1,422,062 older patients. Sixteen delay intervals were compared. Fourteen studies (36%) found significantly longer delays among younger adults, and nine (23%) found shorter delays among younger patients. Twelve studies compared time from symptom onset to diagnosis (N younger = 1538). Five showed significantly longer delays for younger adults. Adults <50 years also had higher odds of advanced stage (16 studies, pooled OR for Stage III/IV 1.76, 95% CI 1.52-2.03). Ten studies compared time from diagnosis to treatment (N younger = 171,726) with 4 showing significantly shorter delays for younger adults. All studies showing longer delays for younger adults examined pre-diagnostic intervals. Three studies compared the impact of delay on younger versus older adult. One showed longer delays were associated with advanced stage and worse survival in younger but not older adults. Longer delays among younger adults with CRC occur in pre-diagnostic intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Castelo
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Colin Sue-Chue-Lam
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Lawrence Paszat
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Adena S. Scheer
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Bettina E. Hansen
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Teruko Kishibe
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Nancy N. Baxter
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St. Level 5, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-43-531-3313
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sarma EA, Thompson MJ, Bowles EJA, Burnett-Hartman AN, Hubbard RA, Yu O, Chubak J. Patient and tumour characteristics of screening-age adults diagnosed with screen-detected versus symptomatic colon cancer. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:1344-1351. [PMID: 35739634 PMCID: PMC10018485 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM International studies have shown that most colon cancers are diagnosed among people with symptoms, but research is limited in the United States. Here, we conducted a retrospective study of adults aged 50-85 years diagnosed with stage I-IIIA colon cancer between 1995 and 2014 in two US healthcare systems. METHODS Mode of detection (screening or symptomatic) was ascertained from medical records. We estimated unadjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing detection mode by patient factors at diagnosis (year, age, sex, race, smoking status, body mass index [BMI], Charlson score), prediagnostic primary care utilization, and tumour characteristics (stage, location). RESULTS Of 1,675 people with colon cancer, 38.4% were screen-detected, while 61.6% were diagnosed following symptomatic presentation. Screen-detected cancer was more common among those diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 versus 1995-1999 (OR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.19-2.28), and those with a BMI of 25-<30 kg/m2 (OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.21-1.98) or ≥30 kg/m2 (OR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.18-1.96) versus <25 kg/m2 . Screen-detected cancer was less common among people aged 76-85 (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.39-0.65) versus 50-64, those with comorbidity scores >0 (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.91 for score = 1, OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.26-0.45 for score = 2+), and those with 2+ prediagnostic primary care visits (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.37-0.76) versus 0 visits. The odds of screen detection were lower among patients diagnosed with stage IIA (OR 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27-0.41) or IIB (OR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06-0.24) cancers versus stage I. CONCLUSIONS Most colon cancers among screen-eligible adults were diagnosed following symptomatic presentation. Even with increasing screening rates over time, research is needed to better understand why specific groups are more likely to be diagnosed when symptomatic and identify opportunities for interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Sarma
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew J Thompson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Erin J A Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Rebecca A Hubbard
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Onchee Yu
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Castelo M, Sue-Chue-Lam C, Paszat L, Kishibe T, Scheer AS, Hansen BE, Baxter NN. Time to diagnosis and treatment in younger adults with colorectal cancer: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273396. [PMID: 36094913 PMCID: PMC9467377 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of colorectal cancer is rising in adults <50 years of age. As a primarily unscreened population, they may have clinically important delays to diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to review the literature on delay intervals in patients <50 years with colorectal cancer (CRC), and explore associations between longer intervals and outcomes. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS were searched until December 2, 2021. We included studies published after 1990 reporting any delay interval in adults <50 with CRC. Interval measures and associations with stage at presentation or survival were synthesized and described in a narrative fashion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Institute of Health Economics Case Series Quality Appraisal Checklist, and the Aarhus Checklist for cancer delay studies. Results 55 studies representing 188,530 younger CRC patients were included. Most studies used primary data collection (64%), and 47% reported a single center. Sixteen unique intervals were measured. The most common interval was symptom onset to diagnosis (21 studies; N = 2,107). By sample size, diagnosis to treatment start was the most reported interval (12 studies; N = 170,463). Four studies examined symptoms onset to treatment start (total interval). The shortest was a mean of 99.5 days and the longest was a median of 217 days. There was substantial heterogeneity in the measurement of intervals, and quality of reporting. Higher-quality studies were more likely to use cancer registries, and be population-based. In four studies reporting the relationship between intervals and cancer stage or survival, there were no clear associations between longer intervals and adverse outcomes. Discussion Adults <50 with CRC may have intervals between symptom onset to treatment start greater than 6 months. Studies reporting intervals among younger patients are limited by inconsistent results and heterogeneous reporting. There is insufficient evidence to determine if longer intervals are associated with advanced stage or worse survival. Other This study’s protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number CRD42020179707).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Castelo
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colin Sue-Chue-Lam
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Paszat
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Teruko Kishibe
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adena S. Scheer
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bettina E. Hansen
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N. Baxter
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mekinda MA, Rogg SR, Peña CG, Domecki ML, Goss KH, Galinski B, Dolan ME. Chicago EYES on Cancer: Fostering Diversity in Biomedicine through Cancer Research Training for Students and Teachers. JOURNAL OF STEM OUTREACH 2022; 5:10.15695/jstem/v5i2.11. [PMID: 36571071 PMCID: PMC9788461 DOI: 10.15695/jstem/v5i2.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute's Youth Enjoy Science Research Education Program (YES) supports cancer-based research experiences, curriculum development and outreach activities to foster diversity in the biomedical workforce. The University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center was among the first recipients of the YES award in 2017, launching the Chicago EYES (Educators and Youth Enjoy Science) on Cancer program for high school and college students. The EYES team also introduced immersive research experiences and mentored curriculum development for high school science teachers, a potentially powerful means to extend science enrichment and career exposure to schools across Chicago. Ongoing evaluation of the EYES program suggests positive outcomes in terms of trainees' research skill development and their knowledge about, and positive attitudes towards, careers in biomedicine. Teacher research fellows reported that the program inspired new insights about science learning and practice that not only strengthened their skills as science educators, but also improved their ability to relate to their pupils. These findings contribute to the broader effort to establish best practices among cancer research training programs, particularly those with a shared mission to empower youth from diverse backgrounds to contribute to a field deeply in need of their talents and perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A. Mekinda
- University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Christopher G. Peña
- University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Michelle L. Domecki
- University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Kathleen H. Goss
- University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Basia Galinski
- University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - M. Eileen Dolan
- University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Snyder RA, Hu CY, DiBrito SR, Chang GJ. Association of Medicaid Expansion with Racial Disparities in Cancer Stage at Presentation. Cancer 2022; 128:3340-3351. [PMID: 35818763 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the independent association of Medicaid expansion on stage of presentation among patients of Black and White race with colorectal (CRC), breast, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS A cohort study of patients with CRC, breast cancer, or NSCLC (2009-2017) in the National Cancer Database was performed. Difference-in-differences (DID) analysis was used to compare changes in tumor stage at diagnosis between Medicaid expansion (MES) and non-expansion states (non-MES) before and after expansion. Predictive margins were calculated by race, year, and insurance status to account for effect heterogeneity. Stage migration was determined by measuring the combined proportional increase in stage I and decrease in stage IV disease at diagnosis. RESULTS Black patients gained less Medicaid coverage than White patients (6.0% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001) after expansion. Among Black and White patients, there was a shift towards increased early-stage diagnosis (DID 3.5% and 3.5%, respectively; p < 0.001) and decreased late-stage diagnosis (DID White: -3.5%; Black -2.5%; p < 0.001) in MES compared to non-MES following expansion. Overall stage migration was greater for White compared to Black patients with CRC (10.3% vs. 5.1%) and NSCLC (8.1% vs. 6.7%) after expansion. Stage migration effects in patients with breast cancer were similar by race (White 4.8% vs. Black 4.5%). CONCLUSION An increased proportion of Black and White patients residing in Medicaid expansion states presented with earlier stage cancer following Medicaid expansion. However, because the proportion of Black patients is higher in non-expansion states, national racial disparities in cancer stage at presentation appear worse following Medicaid expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chung-Yuan Hu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sandra R DiBrito
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jones LA, Brewer KC, Carnahan LR, Parsons JA, Polite BN, Ferrans CE, Warnecke RB, Rauscher GH. Health Insurance Status as a Predictor of Mode of Colon Cancer Detection but Not Stage at Diagnosis: Implications for Early Detection. Public Health Rep 2022; 137:479-487. [PMID: 33789522 PMCID: PMC9109539 DOI: 10.1177/0033354921999173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For colon cancer patients, one goal of health insurance is to improve access to screening that leads to early detection, early-stage diagnosis, and polyp removal, all of which results in easier treatment and better outcomes. We examined associations among health insurance status, mode of detection (screen detection vs symptomatic presentation), and stage at diagnosis (early vs late) in a diverse sample of patients recently diagnosed with colon cancer from the Chicago metropolitan area. METHODS Data came from the Colon Cancer Patterns of Care in Chicago study of racial and socioeconomic disparities in colon cancer screening, diagnosis, and care. We collected data from the medical records of non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients aged ≥50 and diagnosed with colon cancer from October 2010 through January 2014 (N = 348). We used logistic regression with marginal standardization to model associations between health insurance status and study outcomes. RESULTS After adjusting for age, race, sex, and socioeconomic status, being continuously insured 5 years before diagnosis and through diagnosis was associated with a 20 (95% CI, 8-33) percentage-point increase in prevalence of screen detection. Screen detection in turn was associated with a 15 (95% CI, 3-27) percentage-point increase in early-stage diagnosis; however, nearly half (47%; n = 54) of the 114 screen-detected patients were still diagnosed at late stage (stage 3 or 4). Health insurance status was not associated with earlier stage at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS For health insurance to effectively shift stage at diagnosis, stronger associations are needed between health insurance and screening-related detection; between screening-related detection and early stage at diagnosis; or both. Findings also highlight the need to better understand factors contributing to late-stage colon cancer diagnosis despite screen detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey A. Jones
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public
Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Katherine C. Brewer
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public
Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leslie R. Carnahan
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health,
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Research on Women and Gender, College of Medicine,
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Parsons
- Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago,
Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Blase N. Polite
- School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL,
USA
| | - Carol Estwing Ferrans
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at
Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL,
USA
| | - Richard B. Warnecke
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at
Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Garth H. Rauscher
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public
Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at
Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Horsey ML, Lai D, Sparks AD, Herur-Raman A, Borum M, Rao S, Ng M, Obias VJ. Disparities in utilization of robotic surgery for colon cancer: an evaluation of the U.S. National Cancer Database. J Robot Surg 2022; 16:1299-1306. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01371-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
18
|
Baxter NN, Kennedy EB, Bergsland E, Berlin J, George TJ, Gill S, Gold PJ, Hantel A, Jones L, Lieu C, Mahmoud N, Morris AM, Ruiz-Garcia E, You YN, Meyerhardt JA. Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:892-910. [PMID: 34936379 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop recommendations for adjuvant therapy for patients with resected stage II colon cancer. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS Twenty-one observational studies and six randomized controlled trials met the systematic review inclusion criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is not routinely recommended for patients with stage II colon cancer who are not in a high-risk subgroup. Patients with T4 tumors are at higher risk of recurrence and should be offered ACT, whereas patients with other high-risk factors, including sampling of fewer than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen, perineural or lymphatic invasion, poorly or undifferentiated tumor grade, intestinal obstruction, tumor perforation, or grade BD3 tumor budding, may be offered ACT. The addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based ACT is not routinely recommended, but may be offered as a result of shared decision making. Patients with mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability tumors should not be routinely offered ACT; if the combination of mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability and high-risk factors results in a decision to offer ACT, oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is recommended. Duration of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is also addressed, with recommendations for 3 or 6 months of treatment with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, with decision making informed by key evidence of 5-year disease-free survival in each treatment subgroup and the rate of adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emily Bergsland
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Y Nancy You
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hao S, Parikh AA, Snyder RA. Racial Disparities in the Management of Locoregional Colorectal Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 31:65-79. [PMID: 34776065 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Racial disparities pervade nearly all aspects of management of locoregional colorectal cancer, including time to treatment, receipt of resection, adequacy of resection, postoperative complications, and receipt of neoadjuvant and adjuvant multimodality therapies. Disparate gaps in treatment translate into enduring effects on survivorship, recurrence, and mortality. Efforts to reduce these gaps in care must be undertaken on a multilevel basis and focus on modifiable factors that underlie racial disparity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlett Hao
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, 600 Moye Boulevard, Surgical Oncology Suite, 4S-24, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| | - Alexander A Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, 600 Moye Boulevard, Surgical Oncology Suite, 4S-24, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, 600 Moye Boulevard, Surgical Oncology Suite, 4S-24, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hao S, Snyder RA, Irish W, Parikh AA. Association of race and health insurance in treatment disparities of colon cancer: A retrospective analysis utilizing a national population database in the United States. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003842. [PMID: 34695123 PMCID: PMC8575307 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both health insurance status and race independently impact colon cancer (CC) care delivery and outcomes. The relative importance of these factors in explaining racial and insurance disparities is less clear, however. This study aimed to determine the association and interaction of race and insurance with CC treatment disparities. STUDY SETTING Retrospective cohort review of a prospective hospital-based database. METHODS AND FINDINGS In this cross-sectional study, patients diagnosed with stage I to III CC in the United States were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB; 2006 to 2016). Multivariable regression with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were performed to evaluate the association of insurance and race/ethnicity with odds of receipt of surgery (stage I to III) and adjuvant chemotherapy (stage III), with an additional 2-way interaction term to evaluate for effect modification. Confounders included sex, age, median income, rurality, comorbidity, and nodes and margin status for the model for chemotherapy. Of 353,998 patients included, 73.8% (n = 261,349) were non-Hispanic White (NHW) and 11.7% (n = 41,511) were non-Hispanic Black (NHB). NHB patients were less likely to undergo resection [odds ratio (OR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.72, p < 0.001] or to receive adjuvant chemotherapy [OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.87, p < 0.001] compared to NHW patients. NHB patients with private or Medicare insurance were less likely to undergo resection [OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p = 0.004 (private insurance); OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.66, p < 0.001 (Medicare)] and to receive adjuvant chemotherapy [0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87, p < 0.001 (private insurance); OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91, p < 0.001 (Medicare)] compared to similarly insured NHW patients. Although Hispanic patients with private and Medicare insurance were also less likely to undergo surgical resection, this was not the case with adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is mainly limited by the retrospective nature and by the variables provided in the dataset; granular details such as continuity or disruption of insurance coverage or specific chemotherapy agents or dosing cannot be assessed within NCDB. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that racial disparities in receipt of treatment for CC persist even among patients with similar health insurance coverage and that different disparities exist for different racial/ethnic groups. Changes in health policy must therefore recognize that provision of insurance alone may not eliminate cancer treatment racial disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlett Hao
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Rebecca A. Snyder
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - William Irish
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Alexander A. Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Berkman AM, Andersen CR, Puthenpura V, Livingston JA, Ahmed S, Cuglievan B, Hildebrandt MAT, Roth ME. Impact of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status over Time on the Long-term Survival of Adolescent and Young Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1717-1725. [PMID: 34244160 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although there are growing numbers of adolescent and young adult (AYA) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors, long-term overall survival (OS) patterns and disparities in this population are underreported. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), rurality, diagnosis age, sex, and HL stage over time on long-term survival in AYA HL survivors. METHODS The authors used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to identify survivors of HL diagnosed as AYAs (ages 15-39 years) between the years 1980 and 2009 and who were alive 5 years after diagnosis. An accelerated failure time model was used to estimate survival over time and compare survival between groups. RESULTS There were 15,899 5-year survivors of AYA HL identified, with a median follow-up of 14.4 years and range up to 33.9 years from diagnosis. Non-Hispanic black survivors had inferior survival compared with non-Hispanic white survivors [survival time ratio (STR): 0.71, P = 0.002]. Male survivors, older age at diagnosis, those diagnosed at higher stages, and those living in areas of higher SES deprivation had unfavorable long-term survival. There was no evidence of racial or sex-based survival disparities changing over time. CONCLUSIONS Racial, SES, and sex-based disparities persist well into survivorship among AYA HL survivors. IMPACT Disparities in long-term survival among AYA HL survivors show no evidence of improving over time. Studies investigating specific factors associated with survival disparities are needed to identify opportunities for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Berkman
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Clark R Andersen
- Division of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vidya Puthenpura
- Section of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - J Andrew Livingston
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Branko Cuglievan
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michelle A T Hildebrandt
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Roth
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Silva T, Kadakia N, Aribo C, Gochi A, Kim GY, Solomon N, Molkara A, Molina DC, Plasencia A, Lum SS. Compliance With Surgical Oncology Specialty Care at a Safety Net Facility. Am Surg 2021; 87:1545-1550. [PMID: 34130523 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211024975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social determinants of health challenge in at-risk patients seen in safety net facilities. STUDY DESIGN We performed a retrospective review of surgical oncology specialty clinic referrals at a safety net institution evaluating referral compliance and times to first appointment and initiation of definitive treatment. Main outcomes measured included completion of initial visit, initiation of definitive treatment, time from referral to first appointment, and time from first appointment to initiation of definitive treatment. RESULTS Of 189 new referrals, English was not spoken by 52.4% and 69.4% were Hispanic. Patients presented without insurance in 39.2% of cases. Electronic patient portal was accessed by 31.6% of patients. Of all new referrals, 55.0% arrived for initial consultation and 53.4% initiated definitive treatment. Malignant diagnosis (P < .0001) and lack of insurance (P = .01) were associated with completing initial consultation. Initiation of definitive treatment was associated with not speaking English (P = .03), malignant diagnosis (P < .0001), and lack of insurance (P = .03). Times to first appointment and initiation of definitive treatment were not significantly affected by race/ethnicity, language, insurance, treatment recommended, or electronic patient portal access. CONCLUSION Access to surgical oncology care for at-risk patients at a safety net facility is not adversely affected by lack of insurance, primary spoken language, or race/ethnicity. However, a significant proportion of all patients fail to complete the initial consultation and definitive treatment. Lessons learned from safety net facilities may help to inform disparities in health care found elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor Silva
- Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, CA, USA
| | - Nikita Kadakia
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Chade Aribo
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Gochi
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Gi Yoon Kim
- Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, CA, USA
| | - Naveen Solomon
- Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Afshin Molkara
- Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - David C Molina
- Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Alexis Plasencia
- Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Sharon S Lum
- Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Estrella JB, Carmichael H, Myers QWO, Lee S, Velopulos CG. Making it Complicated: Does Disparity in Access to Care Lead to More Perforated Appendicitis? J Surg Res 2021; 266:405-412. [PMID: 34091088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Delays in obtaining care may lead to perforated appendicitis, increasing risk of morbidity and mortality. We previously explored the role of social determinants in patients undergoing cholecystectomy, finding that emergent presentation is associated with neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). We hypothesize that social vulnerability is associated with increased incidence of perforated appendicitis. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients presenting to our urban, academic hospital with acute appendicitis during a 9-month timeframe (11/2019 - 7/2020). Patients were classified as perforated or non-perforated. Patient SVI was determined using geocoding at the census tract level. Because rates of perforation were higher in older patients, we performed a subset analysis of patients ≥ 40 years. RESULTS 190 patients were included. Patients with perforated appendicitis (n = 48, 25%) were older and were more likely to present to a clinic versus the emergency department (P = 0.009). Perforated patients had longer delay before seeking care (56% versus 6% with > 72 hours of symptoms, P < 0.001). However, there were no differences between groups in terms of sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, language barrier, having a primary care physician, or any of the SVI subscales. Of patients ≥ 40 years, a higher proportion were perforated (28/80, 35%) despite similar rates of delayed care. In this cohort, higher overall SVI as well as the socioeconomic status and household composition/disability subscales were associated with perforation. CONCLUSIONS Contrary to our hypothesis, while perforation was associated with delayed care in this population, we did not find overall that social vulnerability or individual social determinants accounted for this delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather Carmichael
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Sterling Lee
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA
| | - Catherine G Velopulos
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Singh S, Sridhar P. A narrative review of sociodemographic risk and disparities in screening, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of the most common extrathoracic malignancies in the United States. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:3827-3843. [PMID: 34277073 PMCID: PMC8264686 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
There is a well-established association between multiple sociodemographic risk factors and disparities in cancer care. These risk factors include minority race and ethnicity, low socioeconomic status (SES) including low income and education level, non-English primary language, immigrant status, and residential segregation, and distance to facilities that deliver cancer care. As cancer care advances, existing disparities in screening, treatment, and outcomes have become more evident. Lung cancer remains the most common and fatal malignancy in the United States, with breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer being the three most common and deadly extrathoracic malignancies. Achieving the best outcomes for patients with these malignancies relies on strong physician-patient relationships leading to robust screening, early diagnosis, and early referral to facilities that can deliver multidisciplinary care and multimodal therapy. It is likely that challenges experienced in developing patient trust and understanding, providing access to screening, and building referral pipelines for definitive therapy in lung cancer care to vulnerable populations are paralleled by those in extrathoracic malignancies. Likewise, progress made in delivering optimal care to all patients across sociodemographic and geographic barriers can serve as a roadmap. Therefore, we provide a narrative review of current disparities in screening, treatment, and outcomes for patients with breast, prostate, and colorectal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Singh
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Praveen Sridhar
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Carnahan LR, Jones L, Brewer KC, Watts EA, Peterson CE, Ferrans CE, Cipriano-Steffens T, Polite B, Maker AV, Chowdhery R, Molina Y, Rauscher GH. Race and Gender Differences in Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Guidelines Among Recently Diagnosed Colon Cancer Patients in an Urban Setting. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:567-575. [PMID: 31838729 PMCID: PMC7293559 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01666-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to first characterize the prevalence of recall, recognition, and knowledge of colon cancer screening tests and guidelines (collectively, "awareness") among non-Hispanic black (NHB) and NH white (NHW) urban colon cancer patients. Second, we sought to examine whether awareness was associated with mode of cancer detection. Low awareness regarding colon cancer screening tests and guidelines may explain low screening rates and high prevalence of symptomatic detection. We examined recall, recognition, and knowledge of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests and guidelines and their associations with mode of cancer detection (symptomatic versus screen-detected) in 374 newly diagnosed NHB and NHW patients aged 45-79. Patients were asked to name or describe any test to screen for colon cancer (recall); next, they were given descriptions of stool testing and colonoscopy and asked if they recognized each test (recognition). Lastly, patients were asked if they knew the screening guidelines (knowledge). Overall, awareness of CRC screening guidelines was low; just 20% and 13% of patients knew colonoscopy and fecal test guidelines, respectively. Awareness of CRC screening tests and guidelines was especially low among NHB males, socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, and those diagnosed at public healthcare facilities. Inability to name or recall a single test was associated with reduced screen-detected cancer compared with recall of at least one test (36% vs. 22%, p = 0.01). Low awareness of CRC screening tests is a risk factor for symptomatic detection of colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie R Carnahan
- Center for Research on Women and Gender, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Lindsey Jones
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Katherine C Brewer
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Watts
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Caryn E Peterson
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Carol Estwing Ferrans
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Blase Polite
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ajay V Maker
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Creticos Cancer Center, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rozina Chowdhery
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yamilé Molina
- Center for Research on Women and Gender, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Garth H Rauscher
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lima MAN, Villela DAM. [Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with time to treatment for colorectal cancer in Brazil, 2006-2015]. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2021; 37:e00214919. [PMID: 34076098 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00214919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer presents high incidence worldwide, but case-fatality is higher in developing countries. The study's objective was to analyze sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with delay in the initiation of treatment for colorectal cancer in hospitals in Brazil. This is a retrospective study of data from hospital cancer registries in Brazil from 2006 to 2015. The target variable is time to initiation of treatment for colorectal cancer and possible associations between sociodemographic variables and clinical factors. The analysis revealed disparities in time to treatment according to sociodemographic strata and geographic regions. Higher odds of treatment delay were associated with age over 50 years, black race/color (OR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.21-1.84) and brown race/color (OR = 1.28; 95%CI: 1.17-1.42), illiteracy or low schooling (OR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.19-1.90), and treatment in a city far from the patient's residence (OR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.14-1.38). For rectal cancer, higher odds of treatment delay were associated with age over 50 years, black (OR = 1.44; 95%CI: 1.20-1.72) or brown race/color (OR = 1.29; 95%CI: 1.19-1.39), illiteracy or low schooling (OR = 1.71; 95%CI: 1.40-2.09), and treatment in a city far from the patient's residence (OR = 1.35; 95%CI: 1.25-1.47). In conclusion, greater attention should be given to reducing the time to initiation of treatment in underprivileged regions and in social strata identified with barriers to timely treatment access.
Collapse
|
27
|
Vahl JM, von Witzleben A, Welke C, Doescher J, Theodoraki MN, Brand M, Schuler PJ, Greve J, Hoffmann TK, Laban S. Influence of travel burden on tumor classification and survival of head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:4535-4543. [PMID: 33877433 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06816-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer patients have to overcome various barriers to obtain diagnostics and treatment at head and neck cancer centers. Travel distance to a specialized hospital may result in psychosocial and financial distress, thus interfering with diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up care. In this study, we have aimed to analyze the association of travel distance with cTNM status, UICC stage at primary diagnosis, and survival outcomes of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. METHODS We have analyzed data of 1921 consecutive HNC patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2019 at the head and neck cancer center of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm (CCCU), Germany. Postal code-based travel distance calculation in kilometers, TNM status, and UICC stage were recorded at initial diagnosis. The assembly of travel distance-related groups (short, intermediate, long-distance) has been investigated. Moreover, group-related survival and recurrence analysis have been performed. RESULTS In contrast to observations from overseas, no association of travel distance and higher cTNM status or UICC stage at primary diagnosis has been observed. Furthermore, no significant differences for recurrence-free survival and overall survival by travel distance were detected. CONCLUSION In southern Germany, travel distance to head and neck cancer centers seems to be tolerable. Travel burden is not synonymous with travel distance alone but also involves sociodemographic, monetary, and disease-specific aspects as well as accessibility to proper infrastructure of transport and health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Vahl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
| | - A von Witzleben
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - C Welke
- Clinical Cancer Registry Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - J Doescher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - M N Theodoraki
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - M Brand
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - P J Schuler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - J Greve
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - T K Hoffmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - S Laban
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rieser CJ, Hoehn RS, Zenati M, Hall LB, Kang E, Zureikat AH, Lee A, Ongchin M, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Presentation and Outcomes in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Following Cytoreduction and Chemoperfusion: Persistent Inequalities in Outcomes at a High-Volume Center. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:3522-3531. [PMID: 33687614 PMCID: PMC8184539 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09627-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS HIPEC) can offer significant survival advantage for select patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). Low socioeconomic status (SES) is implicated in disparities in access to care. We analyze the impact of SES on postoperative outcomes and survival at a high-volume tertiary CRS HIPEC center. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients who underwent CRS HIPEC for CRPM from 2000 to 2018. Patients were grouped according to SES. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival were examined between groups. RESULTS A total of 226 patients were analyzed, 107 (47%) low-SES and 119 (53%) high-SES patients. High-SES patients were younger (52 vs. 58 years, p = 0.01) and more likely to be White (95.0% vs. 91.6%, p = 0.06) and privately insured (83% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). They traveled significantly further for treatment and had lower burden of comorbidities and frailty (p = 0.01). Low-SES patients more often presented with synchronous peritoneal metastases (48% vs. 35%, p = 0.05). Following CRS HIPEC, low-SES patients had longer length of stay and higher burden of postoperative complications, 90-day readmission, and 30-day mortality. Median overall survival following CRS HIPEC was worse for low-SES patients (17.8 vs. 32.4 months, p = 0.02). This disparity persisted on multivariate survival analysis (low SES: HR = 1.46, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Despite improving therapies for CRPM, low-SES patients remain at a significant disadvantage. Even patients who overcome barriers to care experience worse short- and long-term outcomes. Improving access and addressing these disparities is crucial to ensure equitable outcomes and improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Richard S Hoehn
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mazen Zenati
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eliza Kang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bui A, Yang L, Myint A, May FP. Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status Are Associated With Prolonged Time to Treatment After a Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Large Population-Based Study. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:1394-1396.e3. [PMID: 33058864 PMCID: PMC7956146 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Bui
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Liu Yang
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anthony Myint
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Folasade P. May
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California,UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Osarogiagbon RU, Sineshaw HM, Unger JM, Acuña-Villaorduña A, Goel S. Immune-Based Cancer Treatment: Addressing Disparities in Access and Outcomes. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-13. [PMID: 33830825 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_323523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Avoidable differences in the care and outcomes of patients with cancer (i.e., cancer care disparities) emerge or worsen with discoveries of new, more effective approaches to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The rapidly expanding use of immunotherapy for many different cancers across the spectrum from late to early stages has, predictably, been followed by emerging evidence of disparities in access to these highly effective but expensive treatments. The danger that these new treatments will further widen preexisting cancer care and outcome disparities requires urgent corrective intervention. Using a multilevel etiologic framework that categorizes the targets of intervention at the individual, provider, health care system, and social policy levels, we discuss options for a comprehensive approach to prevent and, where necessary, eliminate disparities in access to the clinical trials that are defining the optimal use of immunotherapy for cancer, as well as its safe use in routine care among appropriately diverse populations. We make the case that, contrary to the traditional focus on the individual level in descriptive reports of health care disparities, there is sequentially greater leverage at the provider, health care system, and social policy levels to overcome the challenge of cancer care and outcomes disparities, including access to immunotherapy. We also cite examples of effective government-sponsored and policy-level interventions, such as the National Cancer Institute Minority-Underserved Community Oncology Research Program and the Affordable Care Act, that have expanded clinical trial access and access to high-quality cancer care in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joseph M Unger
- Health Services Research, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Affiliate, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Sanjay Goel
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Quarrier S, Li S, Penniston KL, Best SL, Hedican SP, Jhagroo RA, Nakada SY. Lower Socioeconomic Status is Associated With Adverse Urinary Markers and Surgical Complexity in Kidney Stone Patients. Urology 2020; 146:67-71. [PMID: 32991913 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if socioeconomic status (SES) correlates with severity of kidney stone disease and 24-hour urine parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS An IRB approved prospectively maintained database for nephrolithiasis was retrospectively analyzed for both 24-hour urine results and surgical procedures performed from 2009 to 2019. Severely distressed communities (SDC) were categorized as those with a Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a composite measure of SES, score in the top quartile (lowest for SES). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the strength of the association of DCI on: stone size at presentation, need for and type of surgical procedure, need for staged surgery and specific stone risk factors in 24-hour urine collections. RESULTS Surgical procedures were performed on 3939 patients (1978 women) who were not from SDC and 200 (97 women) from SDC. Patients from SDC were older (57.1 years vs 54.2 years; P = .009). Patients from SDC were more likely to undergo proportionally more invasive procedures (17.5% vs 11.6%; P = .011) and require staged surgery at a higher rate (13.0% vs 8.5%; P = .028). Men from SDC had larger stones (12.5 mm vs 9.7 mm; P = .001). Among 24-hour urine results from 2454 patients (1187 women), DCI was not correlated with sodium, calcium, magnesium, volume, oxalate, phosphate, and pH levels. Higher DCI (lower SES) correlated with lower urine citrate (P = .001) and lower urine potassium (P = .002). CONCLUSION SES correlates with larger stone burden at the time of urologic intervention, requires proportionally more invasive procedures and more staged procedures. Lower SES correlated with lower urine citrate and potassium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Quarrier
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
| | - Shuang Li
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | | - Sara L Best
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Sean P Hedican
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Roy A Jhagroo
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sharp SP, Ata A, Chismark AD, Canete JJ, Valerian BT, Wexner SD, Lee EC. Racial disparities after stoma construction in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:713-722. [PMID: 31876362 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Racial disparities are under-recognized among patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the complication rates and surgical outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity among patients undergoing colorectal surgery with intestinal stoma creation. METHOD The ACS NSQIP database from 2013 to 2016 was used. Colon, rectum and small bowel cases requiring intestinal stoma creation were selected. Both African-American and other groups of minority patients were compared with Caucasian patients using a complex multivariable analysis model. Primary outcomes of interest were complication rates, mortality and extended hospital length of stay. RESULTS The study included 38 088 admissions. After multivariable analysis, African-American patients still had a prolonged length of hospital stay and higher complication rates. Other minorities also had a prolonged length of hospital stay and higher complication rates. CONCLUSIONS Both African-American and other groups of minority patients requiring an ostomy suffer significantly higher postoperative complication rates and a prolonged hospital length of stay, even after comorbidity adjustment. Access to care, socioeconomic status and comorbid disease management are all important factors for minority patients who undergo colorectal surgery requiring intestinal stoma construction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S P Sharp
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.,Digestive Disease Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - A Ata
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - A D Chismark
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - J J Canete
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - B T Valerian
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - S D Wexner
- Digestive Disease Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - E C Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kaltenmeier C, Malik J, Yazdani H, Geller DA, Medich D, Zureikat A, Tohme S. Refusal of cancer-directed treatment by colon cancer patients: Risk factors and survival outcomes. Am J Surg 2020; 220:1605-1612. [PMID: 32680623 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Surgery with or without chemotherapy represent the only curative option for patients with colon cancer. However, some patients refuse treatment despite the recommendation. This study aims to identify the incidence, risk factors and impact on survival associated with refusal. METHODS A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) analysis between 1998 and 2012 was performed. We identified 924,290 patients with potentially treatable colon cancer. Patients who underwent treatment were compared with patients that refused. RESULTS 7152 patients refused surgery. On multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to refuse if they were older (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.14-1.15), female (OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.12-1.28), African American (vs White, OR = 2.30; 95% CI 2.10-2.51) or on Medicaid (vs private, OR = 3.06; 95% CI 2.49-43.77). Overall survival was worse in patients that refused surgery [median survival 6.8 vs 24 months, Cox hazard ratio (HR) 3.41; 95%CI 3.12-3.60]. Furthermore, 11,334 patients with path. stage III disease refused adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Refusal of treatment affects survival and is independently associated with several variables (gender, race, insurance status), therefore raising the concern that socioeconomic factors may drive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jannat Malik
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hamza Yazdani
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Medich
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Samer Tohme
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tramontano AC, Chen Y, Watson TR, Eckel A, Hur C, Kong CY. Racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer treatment utilization and phase-specific costs, 2000-2014. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0231599. [PMID: 32287320 PMCID: PMC7156060 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study analyzed disparities in utilization and phase-specific costs of care among older colorectal cancer patients in the United States. We also estimated the phase-specific costs by cancer type, stage at diagnosis, and treatment modality. METHODS We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify patients aged 66 or older diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer between 2000-2013, with follow-up to death or December 31, 2014. We divided the patient's experience into separate phases of care: staging or surgery, initial, continuing, and terminal. We calculated total, cancer-attributable, and patient-liability costs. We fit logistic regression models to determine predictors of treatment receipt and fit linear regression models to determine relative costs. All costs are reported in 2019 US dollars. RESULTS Our cohort included 90,023 colon cancer patients and 25,581 rectal cancer patients. After controlling for patient and clinical characteristics, Non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely to receive treatment but were more likely to have higher cancer-attributable costs within different phases of care. Overall, in both the colon and rectal cancer cohorts, mean monthly cost estimates were highest in the terminal phase, next highest in the staging phase, decreased in the initial phase, and were lowest in the continuing phase. CONCLUSIONS Racial/ethnic disparities in treatment utilization and costs persist among colorectal cancer patients. Additionally, colorectal cancer costs are substantial and vary widely among stages and treatment modalities. This study provides information regarding cost and treatment disparities that can be used to guide clinical interventions and future resource allocation to reduce colorectal cancer burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela C. Tramontano
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Yufan Chen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Tina R. Watson
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Chin Hur
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Chung Yin Kong
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Eaglehouse YL, Georg MW, Shriver CD, Zhu K. Racial Comparisons in Timeliness of Colon Cancer Treatment in an Equal-Access Health System. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:410-417. [PMID: 31271431 PMCID: PMC7156930 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-Hispanic black (NHB) adults with cancer may have longer time-to-treatment than non-Hispanic whites (NHW) in the United States. Unequal access to medical care may partially account for this racial disparity. This study aimed to investigate whether there were racial differences in time-to-treatment and in treatment delays for patients diagnosed with colon cancer in the equal-access Military Health System (MHS). METHODS Patients age 18-79 years diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2014, were identified in the Department of Defense Central Cancer Registry and the MHS Data Repository-linked databases. Median time-to-treatment (surgery and chemotherapy) and 95% confidence intervals were compared between NHBs and NHWs in multivariable quantile regression models. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of receiving delayed treatment defined by guidelines for NHBs relative to NHWs were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Patients (n = 3067) had a mean age at diagnosis of 58.4 (12.2) years and the racial distribution was 76.7% NHW and 23.3% NHB. Median adjusted time-to-treatment was similar for NHB compared to NHW patients. The likelihood of receiving delayed treatment was similar between NHB and NHW patients. CONCLUSIONS In the MHS, there was no evidence of treatment delays for NHBs compared to NHWs, suggesting the role of equal access to medical care and insurance coverage in reducing racial disparities in colon cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne L Eaglehouse
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda
- Department of Surgery, Bethesda, MD
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda
| | - Matthew W Georg
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda
| | - Craig D Shriver
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda
- Department of Surgery, Bethesda, MD
| | - Kangmin Zhu
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Bethesda
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Orhurhu V, Agudile E, Chu R, Urits I, Orhurhu MS, Viswanath O, Ohuabunwa E, Simopoulos T, Hirsch J, Gill J. Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of spine augmentation for patients with osteoporotic fractures: an analysis of National Inpatient Sample from 2011 to 2015. Spine J 2020; 20:547-555. [PMID: 31740396 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTENT Vertebral augmentation procedures are used for treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Prior studies have reported disparities in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, particularly with regards to the use of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to report updates in racial and health insurance inequalities of spine augmentation procedures in patients with osteoporotic fractures. METHODS With the use of the National Inpatient Sample, we identified hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures between the period of 2011 and 2015. Patients with spine augmentation, defined by the utilization of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, were also identified. Our primary outcome was defined as the utilization of spine augmentation procedures across ethnic (white, hispanic, black, and asian/pacific islander) and insurance (self-pay, private insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid) groups. Variables were identified from the NIS database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth diagnosis codes. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used for statistical analysis with p value <.05 considered significant. A subgroup analysis was performed across the utilization of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and Medicare coverage. RESULTS We identified a total of 110,028 patients with a primary diagnosis of vertebral fracture between 2011 and 2015 (mean age: 74.4±13.6 years, 68% women). About 16,237 patients (14.8%) underwent any type of spine augmentation with over 75% of the patients receiving kyphoplasty. Multivariate analysis showed that black patients (odds ratio [OR]=0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.70, p<.001), Hispanic patients (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.86, p<.001), and Asian/Pacific Islander (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89, p<.001) had significantly lower odds for receiving any spine augmentation compared with white patients. Patients with Medicaid (OR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.53-0.66, p<.001), private insurance (OR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96, p=.001), and those who self-pay (OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.47-0.69, p<.001) had significantly lower odds of spine augmentation compared with those with Medicare. Comparative use of kyphoplasty was not significantly different between white and black patients (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.70-1.04, p=.12). However, Hispanic patients (OR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99, p=.04) and Asian/Pacific Islander patients (OR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.92, p=.007) had significantly lower use of kyphoplasty compared with white patients. The comparative use of kyphoplasty among patients receiving spine augmentation was not significantly different across each insurances status when compared with patients with Medicare. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that racial and socioeconomic disparities continue to exist with the utilization of spine augmentation procedures in hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vwaire Orhurhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Emeka Agudile
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert Chu
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ivan Urits
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mariam Salisu Orhurhu
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Emmanuel Ohuabunwa
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thomas Simopoulos
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua Hirsch
- Division of Endovascular/Interventional Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jatinder Gill
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cancer-related diagnostic and treatment capabilities of hospitals in the context of racial residential segregation. Public Health 2020; 182:95-101. [PMID: 32213360 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate distribution of hospital-level cancer diagnosis and treatment technologies along dimensions of racial residential segregation. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis of residential segregation and availability of technologies associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment. METHODS American Hospital Association data were merged with American Community Survey data, and hospital was the unit of analysis. Isolation index and Atkinson's index were calculated for racial residential segregation for the census tract in which the hospital is located based on the composite census block groups. Logistic regression was used to model presence of cancer technologies as a function of percent below poverty (scaled 1-10), number of neighboring hospitals, and rural status. RESULTS Segregation measured by isolation index was associated with the availability of some technologies, independent of percentage below 125% poverty line, number of neighboring hospitals, and rural status. Diagnostic cancer technologies, such as CT scan (odds ratio [OR] = 0.928, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.894, 0.964), ultrasound (OR = 0.961, 95% CI: 0.927, 0.997), mammography (OR = 0.943, 95% CI: 0.914, 0.974), optical colonoscopy (OR = 0.932, 95% CI: 0.904, 0.961), and full-field digital mammography (OR = 0.948, 95% CI: 0.920, 0.977) and therapeutic cancer technology such as chemo therapy (OR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.934, 0.992) appear to be less available in neighborhoods with higher isolation index. However, when segregation is measured by Atkinson's index, CT scan (OR = 1.064, 95% CI: 1.010, 1.121), ultrasound (OR = 1.087, 95% CI: 1.035, 1.141), mammography (OR = 1.094, 95% CI: 1.049, 1.141), and optical colonoscopy (OR = 1.053, 95% CI: 1.012, 1.095) are more available in neighborhoods with higher Atkinson's index. CONCLUSION These results suggest that cancer diagnostic capabilities in segregated areas are in the pathway between residential segregation and cancer treatment process, and future studies should evaluate individual-level associations.
Collapse
|
38
|
Brewer KC, Peacock NR, Ferrans CE, Campbell RT, Polite B, Carnahan L, Jones LA, Rauscher GH. Gender- and Race-Based Differences in Barriers and Facilitators to Early Detection of Colon Cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2020; 29:1192-1202. [PMID: 32096681 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Early detection of colon cancer is essential to successful treatment and survival, yet most patients are diagnosed only after onset of symptoms. Previous studies suggest differences in colon cancer screening and presentation by gender and race, but reasons for this are not understood. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to early detection of colon cancer and to compare by gender and race. Materials and Methods: In the Colon Cancer Patterns of Care in Chicago study, non-Hispanic Black and White (NHB, NHW) patients aged 30-79 newly diagnosed with colon cancer between 2010 and 2014 (n = 249) underwent in-depth semistructured interviews regarding the pathway to colon cancer diagnosis. Mixed qualitative and quantitative methods were used to analyze patient narratives and to compare response patterns by gender and race within prespecified domains: health care access factors, provider-related factors, patient-related factors, and diagnostic workup factors. Results: Women reported more barriers than facilitators to early detection than men (barrier: facilitator ratio of 0.60 vs. 0.48). Thematic differences were seen, with women reporting more barriers related to health care access, scheduling of follow-ups, symptom recognition, and inappropriate or inconclusive diagnostic tests. Fewer women than men reported facilitators related to provider factors such as ease of scheduling follow-ups and receiving referrals for screening or a specialist. NHBs and NHWs reported similar ratios of barriers to facilitators (0.55 vs. 0.53), but more NHBs than NHWs reported barriers related to health care access, scheduling follow-ups, and clinical delays, and fewer NHBs reported facilitators related to health care accessibility (existing relationship with provider, ease of scheduling follow-ups). Conclusions: In this diverse population of patients recently diagnosed with colon cancer, we identified substantive gender- and race-based differences in the types and burden of barriers and facilitators to early detection experienced in the path to diagnosis. These differences should be explored further as they may contribute to disparities in the diagnosis and prognosis of colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C Brewer
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nadine R Peacock
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Carol E Ferrans
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center of Excellence in Eliminating Disparities, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Richard T Campbell
- Center of Excellence in Eliminating Disparities, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Blase Polite
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine & Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Leslie Carnahan
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center for Research on Women and Gender, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lindsey A Jones
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Garth H Rauscher
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center of Excellence in Eliminating Disparities, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Propensity-matched analysis of stage-specific efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:877-885. [PMID: 31420159 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contemporary randomized controlled trials exploring adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for bladder cancer (BCa) have yielded inconsistent results due to premature termination and/or poor patient accrual. OBJECTIVE To compare efficacy of AC vs. observation after radical cystectomy stratified by disease stage in a propensity-matched cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a retrospective study that included patients who underwent radical cystectomy for any pT, N0-1, M0 BCa from the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2014). Patients who underwent AC were 1:1 propensity matched with patients who received observation only. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Overall survival was assessed with multivariable Cox regression models where adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS After coarsened exact 1:1 propensity matching, 3,066 patients (AC 1,533; observation 1,533) were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in patient-, facility-, or tumor-level characteristics among cohorts. Compared with patients who underwent observation, recipients of AC had improved overall survival (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.61-0.74). Patients with pT2-4, pN1 disease significantly benefited from AC. Among the pN0 cohort, improved survival from AC was observed only in stages pT3 (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.83) and pT4 (aHR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-0.98). CONCLUSIONS AC was associated with improved survival in locally advanced (pT3-4, pN0) and regionally advanced (pT2-4, pN1) chemotherapy-naive BCa.
Collapse
|
40
|
Wang MM, Warnack E, Joseph KA. Breast Reconstruction in an Underserved Population: A Retrospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:821-826. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6994-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|