Early adulthood overweight and obesity and risk of premenopausal ovarian cancer, and premenopausal breast cancer including receptor status: prospective cohort study of nearly 500,000 Danish women

Comparative transcriptomic, epigenomic and immunological analyses identify drivers of disparity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Black women face the highest mortality-to-incidence ratio from high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). This study investigated biological differences in HGSOC tumors from Black vs. White women. HGSOC from 35 Black and 31 White patients were analyzed by Infinium Methyation-EPIC array and RNA sequencing. 191 CpG sites were differentially methylated (FDR < 0.05, β value change> 10%) and 277 genes were differentially expressed (FDR < 0.05). Gene Ontology identified enriched pathways related to DNA damage response, p53/apoptosis signaling, and cholesterol/lipid metabolism directly connected with genes like INSR, FOXA1 and FOXB1. INSR and FOXA1 knockdown enhanced cisplatin sensitivity and inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation. Tumors from Black patients were infiltrated by fewer CD4+ naïve and regulatory T-cells. Overall, differences in DNA methylation, transcriptomic profiles and immune cell infiltration were detected in tumors from Black vs. White patients. Further investigation is warranted into how these differences may affect treatment response and outcomes in Black women.

Risk Factors for Ovarian Cancer in South America: A Literature Review

Background/Objectives: In 2020, ovarian cancer ranked fourth in global incidence among gynecological cancers and remains the deadliest cancer affecting women's health. Survival rates are significantly higher when the disease is detected at early stages; however, the lack of effective early detection methods underscores the importance of identifying risk factors in order to implement preventive strategies. The objective of this work is to provide an overview of the risk factors of ovarian cancer in South America, emphasizing those linked to social determinants, genetic components, and comorbidities. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. MeSH descriptors and keywords, such as "BRCA1 genes," "BRCA2 genes", "Latin America", and "ovarian neoplasms" were used, along with terms related to socioeconomic and health factors. Inclusion criteria focused on original studies published in the last five years involving South American women. Results: Studies were identified from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. These studies addressed genetic factors, health status at diagnosis, and sociodemographic factors, revealing important data gaps, particularly on contraception and hormone replacement therapy. The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in South America is estimated to be 15-20% among women with inherited risk factors. Social, demographic and economic factors vary by country, although commonalities include a higher prevalence among women over 50 years of age, those with limited education, and those who face barriers to accessing health care. Conclusions: Although the literature does not conclusively establish a direct link between obesity and/or diabetes and the development of ovarian cancer, the indirect association highlights the need for further clinical studies. A general research gap related to risk factors of ovarian cancer could be observed in the South American region.

Role of body mass index and weight change in the risk of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 66 cohort studies

Background

This study was designed to evaluate the effects of body mass index (BMI) and weight change on the risk of developing cancer overall and cancer at different sites.

Methods

We searched PubMed and other databases up to July 2023 using the keywords related to 'risk', 'cancer', 'weight', 'overweight', and 'obesity'. We identified eligible studies, and the inclusion criteria encompassed cohort studies in English that focused on cancer diagnosis and included BMI or weight change as an exposure factor. Multiple authors performed data extraction and quality assessment, and statistical analyses were carried out using RevMan and R software. We used random- or fixed-effects models to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess study quality.

Results

Analysis included 66 cohort studies. Compared to underweight or normal weight, overweight or obesity was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, and liver cancer but a decreased risk of prostate cancer and lung cancer. Being underweight was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer and lung cancer but not that of postmenopausal breast cancer or female reproductive cancer. In addition, weight loss of more than five kg was protective against overall cancer risk.

Conclusions

Overweight and obesity increase the risk of most cancers, and weight loss of >5 kg reduces overall cancer risk. These findings provide insights for cancer prevention and help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying cancer development.

Registration

Reviewregistry1786.

Body mass index and risk of cancer in young women

It is unclear how increasing body mass index (BMI) influences risk of cancer in young women. We used data from the Medical Birth, Patient and Cause of Death registers collected between 1982 and 2014 to determine the risk of obesity-related cancer types, breast cancer, all cancer and cancer-related death in relation to BMI in 1,386,725 women, aged between 18 and 45 years, in Sweden. During a median follow-up of 16.3 years (IQR 7.7-23.5), 9808 women developed cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) of endometrial and ovarian cancer increased with higher BMI from 1.08 (95% CI 0.93-1.24) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.96-1.21) among women with BMI 22.5-< 25 to 2.33 (95% CI 1.92-2.83) and 1.48 (95% CI 1.24-1.77), respectively, among women with BMI ≥ 30. There were linear and positive associations between BMI and incident cancer in the ovary, colon, endometrium, pancreas, rectum, gallbladder, esophageal cancer and renal cell carcinoma, as well as death from obesity-related cancer forms. In conclusion, we found that elevated BMI in young women linearly associated with several obesity-related cancer forms, including death from these cancers.

Association of physical weight statuses defined by body mass index (BMI) with molecular subtypes of premenopausal breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The association between overweight/obesity and postmenopausal breast cancer has been proven. However, uncertainty exists regarding the association between physical weight statuses and premenopausal breast cancer subtypes. This study aimed to explore the association of body weight statuses with molecular subtypes of premenopausal breast cancer.

METHOD

A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools were used to evaluate the quality of the literature. STATA and R software were used to analyze the extracted data.

RESULT

The meta-analysis included 35 observational studies with a total of 41,049 premenopausal breast cancer patients. The study showed that the proportion of underweight patients was 4.8% (95% CI = 3.9-5.8%, P = 0.01), overweight was 29% (95%CI = 27.1-30.9%, P < 0.01), obesity was 17.8% (95% CI = 14.9-21.2%, P < 0.0001), and normal weight was 51.6% (95% CI = 46.7-56.5%, P < 0.0001). The pooled results showed that in comparison to the normal weight group, being physically underweight is related to a 1.44-fold risk (OR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.28-1.63, P < 0.0001) of HER2 + breast cancer. Overweight is related to a 1.16-fold risk (OR = 1.16, 95%CI = 1.06-1.26, P = 0.002) of TNBC and a 16% lower risk (OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.75-0.93, P = 0.001) of ER + breast cancer. When compared to underweight/normal weight populations, both overweight (OR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.56-0.97, P = 0.032) and obesity (OR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.50-0.98, P = 0.037) can reduce the risk of ER + PR + breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

In the premenopausal breast cancer population, the distribution of patients' numbers with different weight statuses was significantly distinct among the various breast cancer subtypes. Additionally, the associations between physical weight statuses and the risk of premenopausal breast cancer subtypes are divergent.

Metabolic dependencies and targets in ovarian cancer

Reprogramming of cellular metabolism is a hallmark of cancer. Cancer cells undergo metabolic adaptations to maintain tumorigenicity and survive under the attack of immune cells and chemotherapy in the tumor microenvironment. Metabolic alterations in ovarian cancer in part overlap with findings from other solid tumors and in part reflect unique traits. Altered metabolic pathways not only facilitate ovarian cancer cells' survival and proliferation but also endow them to metastasize, acquire resistance to chemotherapy, maintain cancer stem cell phenotype and escape the effects of anti-tumor immune defense. In this review, we comprehensively review the metabolic signatures of ovarian cancer and their impact on cancer initiation, progression, and resistance to treatment. We highlight novel therapeutic strategies targeting metabolic pathways under development.

A retrospective study in tumour characteristics and clinical outcomes of overweight and obese women with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Obesity and breast cancer are two major pathologies closely associated with increasing incidence and mortality rates, especially amongst women. The association between both diseases have been thoroughly discussed but much is still to uncover.

AIM

The aim of this study is to analyse tumour characteristics and clinical outcomes of overweight and obese women to disclosure potential associations and better understand the impact of obesity in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological information of 2246 women were extracted from the institutional database of comprehensive cancer centre in Portugal diagnosed between 2012 and 2016. Women were stratified according to body mass index as normal, overweight, and obese. Patients' demographic information and tumour features (age, family history, topographic localization, laterality, histological type, and receptor status) were taken as independent variables and overall survival, tumour stage, differentiation grade and bilaterality were considered clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The main results reveal that overweight and obesity are predominantly associated with worse outcomes in breast cancer patients. Obese patients present larger (p-value: 0.002; OR 1.422; 95% CI 1.134-1.783) and more poorly differentiated tumours (p-value: 0.002; OR 1.480; 95% CI 1.154-1.898) and tend to have lower overall survival although without statistical significance (p-value: 0.117; OR 1.309; 95% CI 0.934-1.833). Overweighted women are more likely to have bilateral breast cancer (p-value: 0.017; OR 3.076; 95% CI 1.225-7.722) than obese women. The results also reveal that overweight women present less distant metastasis (p-value: 0.024; OR 0.525; 95%CI 0.299-0.920). Topographic localization and laterality did not achieve statistical significance.

Body fatness associations with cancer: evidence from recent epidemiological studies and future directions

This narrative review highlights current evidence linking greater body fatness to risk of various cancers, with focus on evidence from recent large cohort studies and pooled analyses of cohort studies as well as Mendelian randomization studies (which utilized genetic variants associated with body mass index to debrief the causal effect of higher body fatness on cancer risk). This review also provides insights into the biological mechanisms underpinning the associations. Data from both observational and Mendelian randomization studies support the associations of higher body mass index with increased risk of many cancers with the strongest evidence for digestive system cancers, including esophageal, stomach, colorectal, liver, gallbladder, and pancreatic cancer, as well as kidney, endometrial, and ovarian (weak association) cancer. Evidence from observational studies suggests that greater body fatness has contrasting effects on breast cancer risk depending on menopausal status and on prostate cancer risk depending on disease stage. Experimental and Mendelian randomization studies indicate that adiponectin, insulin, and sex hormone pathways play an important role in mediating the link between body fatness and cancer risk. The possible role of specific factors and pathways, such as other adipocytokines and hormones and the gut microbiome in mediating the associations between greater body fatness and cancer risk is yet uncertain and needs investigation in future studies. With rising prevalence of overweight and obesity worldwide, the proportion of cancer caused by excess body fatness is expected to increase. There is thus an urgent need to identify efficient ways at the individual and societal level to improve diet and physical activity patterns to reduce the burden of obesity and accompanying comorbidities, including cancer.