1
|
Hodgson KL, Lamport DJ, Laville A. "Are you OK doctor?" An expanded health belief model exploration of doctors' experiences and perspectives of on-shift health behaviour. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2024; 19:2388795. [PMID: 39104181 PMCID: PMC11305022 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2388795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding doctors' health beliefs is essential for developing effective and competent healthcare practices that benefit doctors and their patients. This study aimed to qualitatively explore doctors' perceptions of on-shift health-protective behaviours and their perceived effects on competence. METHODS The research applied theoretically driven Expanded Health Belief Model (EHBM) enquiry methods to explore beliefs and experiences through an occupational context survey, 14 individual depth interviews, and two focus groups. Semantic and deductive themes associated with EHBM domains were examined, and an inductive thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted. RESULTS Doctors' beliefs were strongly imbued by their perceived identity within the systemic context; they expressed impaired self-efficacy in reacting to their health needs on shift, and several disclosed harm to themselves and patients. Dominant themes included the psychosocial effects of the systemic culture and the influence of the situational occupational context in impacting health-protective behavioural action. The context and implications of experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed. CONCLUSIONS This study presents key belief-oriented factors influencing doctors' health-protective behaviour at work and its implications for competent practice. Further doctor-led guidance on focus points for evidence-based theoretically driven health improvement solutions is provided regarding operational practice, formulating policies, developing interventions and further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty L. Hodgson
- School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Daniel J. Lamport
- School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Allán Laville
- School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Page B, Irving D, Carthey J, Welch J, Higham H, Vincent C. Strategies for adapting under pressure: an interview study in intensive care units. BMJ Qual Saf 2024:bmjqs-2024-017385. [PMID: 39179378 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare systems are operating under substantial pressures. Clinicians and managers are constantly having to make adaptations, which are typically improvised, highly variable and not coordinated across teams. This study aimed to identify and describe the types of everyday pressures in intensive care and the adaptive strategies staff use to respond, with the longer-term aim of developing practical and coordinated strategies for managing under pressure. METHODS We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 20 senior multidisciplinary healthcare professionals from intensive care units (ICUs) in 4 major hospitals in the UK. The interviews explored the everyday pressures faced by intensive care staff and the strategies they use to adapt. A thematic template analysis approach was used to analyse the data based on our previously empirically developed taxonomy of pressures and strategies. RESULTS The principal source of pressure described was a shortage of staff with the necessary skills and experience to care for the increased numbers and complexity of patients which, in turn, increased staff workload and reduced patient flow. Strategies were categorised into anticipatory (in advance of anticipated pressures) and on the day. The dynamic and unpredictable demands on ICUs meant that strategies were mostly deployed on the day, most commonly by flexing staff, prioritisation of patients and tasks and increasing modes of communication and support. CONCLUSIONS ICU staff use a wide variety of adaptive strategies at times of pressure to minimise risk and maintain a reasonable standard of care for patients. These findings provide the foundation for a portfolio of strategies, which can be flexibly employed when under pressure. There is considerable potential for training clinical leaders and teams in the effective use of adaptive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Page
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, Greater London, UK
| | - Dulcie Irving
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Jane Carthey
- Human Factors and Patient Safety, Jane Carthey Consulting, Chiswick, UK
| | - John Welch
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central London Patient Safety Research Collaborative, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Helen Higham
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Charles Vincent
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adams MA, Bevan C, Booker M, Hartley J, Heazell AE, Montgomery E, Sanford N, Treadwell M, Sandall J. Strengthening open disclosure in maternity services in the English NHS: the DISCERN realist evaluation study. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-159. [PMID: 39185618 DOI: 10.3310/ytdf8015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
Background There is a policy drive in NHS maternity services to improve open disclosure with harmed families and limited information on how better practice can be achieved. Objectives To identify critical factors for improving open disclosure from the perspectives of families, doctors, midwives and services and to produce actionable evidence for service improvement. Design A three-phased, qualitative study using realist methodology. Phase 1: two literature reviews: scoping review of post-2013 NHS policy and realist synthesis of initial programme theories for improvement; an interview study with national stakeholders in NHS maternity safety and families. Phase 2: in-depth ethnographic case studies within three NHS maternity services in England. Phase 3: interpretive forums with study participants. A patient and public involvement strategy underpinned all study phases. Setting National recruitment (study phases 1 and 3); three English maternity services (study phase 2). Participants We completed n = 142 interviews, including 27 with families; 93 hours of ethnographic observations, including 52 service and family meetings over 9 months; and interpretive forums with approximately 69 people, including 11 families. Results The policy review identified a shift from viewing injured families as passive recipients to active contributors of post-incident learning, but a lack of actionable guidance for improving family involvement. The realist synthesis found weak evidence of the effectiveness of open disclosure interventions in the international maternity literature, but some improvements with organisation-wide interventions. Recent evidence was predominantly from the United Kingdom. The research identified and explored five key mechanisms for open disclosure: meaningful acknowledgement of harm; involvement of those affected in reviews/investigations; support for families' own sense-making; psychological safely of skilled clinicians (doctors and midwives); and knowing that improvements to care have happened. The need for each family to make sense of the incident in their own terms is noted. The selective initiatives of some clinicians to be more open with some families is identified. The challenges of an adversarial medicolegal landscape and limited support for meeting incentivised targets is evidenced. Limitations Research was conducted after the pandemic, with exceptional pressure on services. Case-study ethnography was of three higher performing services: generalisation from case-study findings is limited. No observations of Health Safety Investigation Branch investigations were possible without researcher access. Family recruitment did not reflect population diversity with limited representation of non-white families, families with disabilities and other socially marginalised groups and disadvantaged groups. Conclusions We identify the need for service-wide systems to ensure that injured families are positioned at the centre of post-incident events, ensure appropriate training and post-incident care of clinicians, and foster ongoing engagement with families beyond the individual efforts made by some clinicians for some families. The need for legislative revisions to promote openness with families across NHS organisations, and wider changes in organisational family engagement practices, is indicated. Examination of how far the study's findings apply to different English maternity services, and a wider rethinking of how family diversity can be encouraged in maternity services research. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020164061. The study has been assessed following RAMESES realist guidelines. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research Programme (NIHR award ref: 17/99/85) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 22. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Ann Adams
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Bevan
- The Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity (SANDS), London, UK
| | | | - Julie Hartley
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Elsa Montgomery
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Natalie Sanford
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jane Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Golightly D, Lonergan J, Ethell D. Human performance in the rail freight yard. ERGONOMICS 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38994738 DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2375013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Human performance in the rail freight yard has been identified as a source of risk for rail freight operations. This is both within the yard itself, and also with train preparation issues leading to incidents on the network. The rail freight yard is an area that has received limited research attention. Over 30 hours of observations were conducted at five major freight yards in Great Britain, along with 30 interviews of rail freight ground staff. Task models, human performance factors and potential solutions that were further explored in a workshop with freight personnel. This analysis led to an understanding of freight yard activities, the impact of freight yard design and environment, and the role external pressures on freight yard performance including upstream planning. The implications are discussed for both current freight operations, and for future technology and process change within the rail freight sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Golightly
- Future Mobility Group, School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sanford N, Lavelle M, Markiewicz O, Reedy G, Rafferty DAM, Darzi LA, Anderson JE. Decoding healthcare teamwork: a typology of hospital teams. J Interprof Care 2024; 38:602-611. [PMID: 38666463 PMCID: PMC11147451 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2024.2343835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
The effectiveness of healthcare depends on successful teamwork. Current understanding of teamwork in healthcare is limited due to the complexity of the context, variety of team structures, and unique demands of healthcare work. This qualitative study aimed to identify different types of healthcare teams based on their structure, membership, and function. The study used an ethnographic approach to observe five teams in an English hospital. Data were analyzed using a combined inductive-deductive approach based on the Temporal Observational Analysis of Teamwork framework. A typology was developed, consisting of five team types: structural, hybrid, satellite, responsive, and coordinating. Teams were challenged to varying degrees with staffing, membership instability, equipment shortages, and other elements of the healthcare environment. Teams varied in their ability to respond to these challenges depending on their characteristics, such as their teamworking style, location, and membership. The typology developed in this study can help healthcare organizations to better understand and design effective teams for different healthcare contexts. It can also guide future research on healthcare teams and provide a framework for comparing teams across settings. To improve teamwork, healthcare organizations should consider the unique needs of different team types and design effective training programs accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Sanford
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Mary Lavelle
- NIHR Patient Safety and Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
- School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Ola Markiewicz
- NIHR Patient Safety and Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gabriel Reedy
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Dame Anne Marie Rafferty
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lord Ara Darzi
- NIHR Patient Safety and Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Janet E. Anderson
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carbonara N, Pellegrino R, De Luca C. Resilience of hospitals in an age of disruptions: a systematic literature review on resources and capabilities. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2024; 13:192-228. [PMID: 39175496 PMCID: PMC11338213 DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2024.2365144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Hospitals play a critical role in ensuring continuous and effective healthcare delivery, especially during crises. However, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in hospital systems, prompting a need to enhance resilience-the ability to withstand, absorb, respond to, recover from, and learn from disasters. A systematic literature review, grounded in the resource-based view, identified organizational characteristics, in terms of resources and capabilities, and their synergistic effects that bolster hospital resilience. The results demonstrate that digital technologies impact on anticipation and adaptation abilities, organizational capabilities to reorganize roles, tasks, and spaces enhance adaptability, and Inter-organizational collaborations increase the responsiveness of the hospitals. The study provides substantial theoretical and practical contributions. It expands knowledge of hospital resilience in light of recent disruptive events and promotes integration capabilities as determinants for the majority of resilience dimensions. All organisational and inter-organisational collaboration, cooperation, and coordination are deemed crucial for hospital resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nunzia Carbonara
- Department of Mechanics Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Roberta Pellegrino
- Department of Mechanics Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Cristina De Luca
- Department of Mechanics Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maben J, Taylor C, Jagosh J, Carrieri D, Briscoe S, Klepacz N, Mattick K. Causes and solutions to workplace psychological ill-health for nurses, midwives and paramedics: the Care Under Pressure 2 realist review. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-171. [PMID: 38662367 DOI: 10.3310/twdu4109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Background Nurses, midwives and paramedics are the largest collective group of clinical staff in the National Health Service and have some of the highest prevalence of psychological ill-health. Existing literature tends to be profession-specific and focused on individual interventions that place responsibility for good psychological health with nurses, midwives and paramedics themselves. Aim To improve understanding of how, why and in what contexts nurses, midwives and paramedics experience work-related psychological ill-health; and determine which high-quality interventions can be implemented to minimise psychological ill-health in these professions. Methods Realist synthesis methodology consistent with realist and meta-narrative evidence syntheses: evolving standards' reporting guidelines. Data sources First round database searching in Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online Database ALL (via Ovid), cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature database (via EBSCO) and health management information consortium database (via Ovid), was undertaken between February and March 2021, followed by supplementary searching strategies (e.g. hand searching, expert solicitation of key papers). Reverse chronology screening was applied, aimed at retaining 30 relevant papers in each profession. Round two database searches (December 2021) targeted COVID-19-specific literature and literature reviews. No date limits were applied. Results We built on seven key reports and included 75 papers in the first round (26 nursing, 26 midwifery, 23 paramedic) plus 44 expert solicitation papers, 29 literature reviews and 49 COVID-19 focused articles in the second round. Through the realist synthesis we surfaced 14 key tensions in the literature and identified five key findings, supported by 26 context mechanism and outcome configurations. The key findings identified the following: (1) interventions are fragmented, individual-focused and insufficiently recognise cumulative chronic stressors; (2) it is difficult to promote staff psychological wellness where there is a blame culture; (3) the needs of the system often override staff well-being at work ('serve and sacrifice'); (4) there are unintended personal costs of upholding and implementing values at work; and (5) it is challenging to design, identify and implement interventions to work optimally for diverse staff groups with diverse and interacting stressors. Conclusions Our realist synthesis strongly suggests the need to improve the systemic working conditions and the working lives of nurses, midwives and paramedics to improve their psychological well-being. Individual, one-off psychological interventions are unlikely to succeed alone. Psychological ill-health is highly prevalent in these staff groups (and can be chronic and cumulative as well as acute) and should be anticipated and prepared for, indeed normalised and expected. Healthcare organisations need to (1) rebalance the working environment to enable healthcare professionals to recover and thrive; (2) invest in multi-level system approaches to promote staff psychological well-being; and use an organisational diagnostic framework, such as the NHS England and NHS Improvement Health and Wellbeing framework, to self-assess and implement a systems approach to staff well-being. Future work Future research should implement, refine and evaluate systemic interventional strategies. Interventions and evaluations should be co-designed with front-line staff and staff experts by experience, and tailored where possible to local, organisational and workforce needs. Limitations The literature was not equivalent in size and quality across the three professions and we did not carry out citation searches using hand searching and stakeholder/expert suggestions to augment our sample. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020172420. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020172420. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129528) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 9. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Maben
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Cath Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Justin Jagosh
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Daniele Carrieri
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Simon Briscoe
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Naomi Klepacz
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Wessex, Southampton, UK
| | - Karen Mattick
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guise V, Chambers M, Lyng HB, Haraldseid-Driftland C, Schibevaag L, Fagerdal B, Dombestein H, Ree E, Wiig S. Identifying, categorising, and mapping actors involved in resilience in healthcare: a qualitative stakeholder analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:230. [PMID: 38388408 PMCID: PMC10882781 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10654-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resilience in healthcare is the capacity to adapt to challenges and changes to maintain high-quality care across system levels. While healthcare system stakeholders such as patients, informal carers, healthcare professionals and service managers have all come to be acknowledged as important co-creators of resilient healthcare, our knowledge and understanding of who, how, and in which contexts different stakeholders come to facilitate and support resilience is still lacking. This study addresses gaps in the research by conducting a stakeholder analysis to identify and categorise the stakeholders that are key to facilitating and sustaining resilience in healthcare, and to investigate stakeholder relationships relevant for the enactment of resilient healthcare systems. METHODS The stakeholder analysis was conducted using a sample of 19 empirical research projects. A narrative summary was written for 14 of the projects, based on publicly available material. In addition, 16 individual interviews were undertaken with researchers from the same sample of 19 projects. The 16 interview transcripts and 14 narratives made up the data material of the study. Application of stakeholder analysis methods was done in three steps: a) identification of stakeholders; b) differentiation and categorisation of stakeholders using an interest/influence grid; and c) investigation and mapping of stakeholder relationships using an actor-linkage matrix. RESULTS Identified stakeholders were Patients, Family Carers, Healthcare Professionals, Ward/Unit Managers, Service or Case Managers, Regulatory Investigators, Policy Makers, and Other Service Providers. All identified stakeholders were categorised as either 'Subjects', 'Players', or 'Context Setters' according to their level of interest in and influence on resilient healthcare. Stakeholder relationships were mapped according to the degree and type of contact between the various groups of stakeholders involved in facilitating resilient healthcare, ranging from 'Not linked' to 'Fully linked'. CONCLUSION Family carers and healthcare professionals were found to be the most active groups of stakeholders in the enactment of healthcare system resilience. Patients, managers, and policy makers also contribute to resilience to various degrees. Relationships between stakeholder groups are largely characterised by communication and coordination, in addition to formal collaborations where diverse actors work together to achieve common goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veslemøy Guise
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Mary Chambers
- Kingston University & St. George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Hilda Bø Lyng
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Cecilie Haraldseid-Driftland
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Lene Schibevaag
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Birte Fagerdal
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Heidi Dombestein
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Eline Ree
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Siri Wiig
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Irving D, Page B, Carthey J, Higham H, Undre S, Vincent C. Adaptive strategies used by surgical teams under pressure: an interview study among senior healthcare professionals in four major hospitals in the United Kingdom. Patient Saf Surg 2024; 18:8. [PMID: 38383433 PMCID: PMC10880194 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-024-00390-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare systems are operating under substantial pressures, and often simply cannot provide the standard of care they aspire to within the available resources. Organisations, managers, and individual clinicians make constant adaptations in response to these pressures, which are typically improvised, highly variable and not coordinated across clinical teams. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the types of everyday pressures experienced by surgical teams and the adaptive strategies they use to respond to these pressures. METHODS We conducted interviews with 20 senior multidisciplinary healthcare professionals from surgical teams in four major hospitals in the United Kingdom. The interviews explored the types of everyday pressures staff were experiencing, the strategies they use to adapt, and how these strategies might be taught to others. RESULTS The primary pressures described by senior clinicians in surgery were increased numbers and complexity of patients alongside shortages in staff, theatre space and post-surgical beds. These pressures led to more difficult working conditions (e.g. high workloads) and problems with system functioning such as patient flow and cancellation of lists. Strategies for responding to these pressures were categorised into increasing or flexing resources, controlling and prioritising patient demand and strategies for managing the workload (scheduling for efficiency, communication and coordination, leadership, and teamwork strategies). CONCLUSIONS Teams are deploying a range of strategies and making adaptations to the way care is delivered. These findings could be used as the basis for training programmes for surgical teams to develop coordinated strategies for adapting under pressure and to assess the impact of different combinations of strategies on patient safety and surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dulcie Irving
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Bethan Page
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Helen Higham
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Shabnam Undre
- Department of Urology, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Foundation Trust, Stevenage, UK
| | - Charles Vincent
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eklund Saksberg M, Bielsten T, Cahill S, Jaarsma T, Nedlund AC, Sandman L, Jaarsma P. Nurses' priority-setting for older nursing home residents during COVID-19. Nurs Ethics 2024:9697330241226597. [PMID: 38317371 DOI: 10.1177/09697330241226597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ethical principles behind prioritization in healthcare are continuously relevant. However, applying ethical principles during times of increased need, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, is challenging. Also, little is known about nursing home nurses' prioritizations in their work to achieve well-being and health for nursing home residents. AIM The aim of this study was to explore nursing home nurses' priority-setting for older nursing home residents in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESEARCH DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND RESEARCH CONTEXT We conducted a qualitative interview study. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (retrospective self-reports) between February and May 2021 with 21 nursing home nurses. To help respondents to recall their memories, we used the critical incident technique (CIT). We analyzed data within the theoretical framework and the methodological orientation of content analysis. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Written and verbal consent was obtained before the interviews, and information was given to participants informing them that participation was entirely voluntary. The Swedish Ethical Review Agency gave an advisory opinion stating that there were no ethical objections to the research project (Dnr. 2020-05649). FINDINGS We identified an overarching theme-nursing home nurses struggling on multiple fronts, "just do it"-and seven categories: striving for survival and caring about a dignified death; responding sensitively to relatives' expectations; ranking the urgency of needed care; responding to input from different actors; combating the spread of infection in unconventional ways; taking the lead and doing what is required; and following the ideals of person-centered nursing. CONCLUSIONS Nurses' priority-setting for older nursing homes residents during the COVID-19 pandemic meant strain and struggle. In some cases, nurses had taken responsibility for priorities falling outside their statutory powers. Different demands and interests affected nurses' priorities. Nursing home nurses need organizational and managerial support to prioritize.
Collapse
|
11
|
Fagerdal B, Lyng HB, Guise V, Anderson JE, Wiig S. No size fits all - a qualitative study of factors that enable adaptive capacity in diverse hospital teams. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1142286. [PMID: 37484113 PMCID: PMC10359188 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Resilient healthcare research studies how healthcare systems and stakeholders adapt and cope with challenges and changes to enable high quality care. By examining how performance emerges in everyday work in different healthcare settings, the research seeks to receive knowledge of the enablers for adaptive capacity. Hospitals are defined as complex organizations with a large number of actors collaborating on increasingly complexity tasks. Consequently, most of today's work in hospitals is team based. The study aims to explore and describe what kind of team factors enable adaptive capacity in hospital teams. Methods The article reports from a multiple embedded case study in two Norwegian hospitals. A case was defined as one hospital containing four different types of teams in a hospital setting. Data collection used triangulation of observation (115 h) and interviews (30), followed by a combined deductive and inductive analysis of the material. Results The study identified four main themes of team related factors for enabling adaptive capacity; (1) technology and tools, (2) roles, procedures, and organization of work, (3) competence, experience, knowledge, and learning, (4) team culture and relations. Discussion Investigating adaptive capacity in four different types of teams allowed for consideration of a range of team types within healthcare and how the team factors vary within and across these teams. All of the four identified team factors are of importance in enabling adaptive capacity, the various attributes of the respective team types prompt differences in the significance of the different factors and indicates that different types of teams could need diverse types of training, structural and relational emphasis in team composition, leadership, and non-technical skills in order to optimize everyday functionality and adaptive capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birte Fagerdal
- Faculty of Health Sciences, SHARE – Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Hilda Bø Lyng
- Faculty of Health Sciences, SHARE – Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Veslemøy Guise
- Faculty of Health Sciences, SHARE – Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Janet E. Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Siri Wiig
- Faculty of Health Sciences, SHARE – Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rydenfält C, Persson J, Erlingsdóttir G, Larsson R, Johansson G. Home care nurses' and managers' work environment during the Covid-19 pandemic: Increased workload, competing demands, and unsustainable trade-offs. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2023; 111:104056. [PMID: 37257218 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Little research exists on how home care nursing personnel have experienced the Covid-19 pandemic. This qualitative study explores the work environment related challenges nurses and managers in home care faced during the pandemic. We discuss these challenges in relation to the Demand-Control-Support Model and reflect on how the organizational dynamics associated with them can be understood using the competing pressures model. During the pandemic, home care nurses and managers experienced both an increased workload and psychosocial strain. For managers, the increased complexity of work was a major problem. We identify three key takeaways related to sustainable crisis management: 1) to support managers' ability to provide social support to their personnel, 2) to increase crisis communication preparedness, and 3) to apply a holistic perspective on protective gear use. We also conclude that the competing pressures model is useful when exploring the dynamics of the work environment in complex organizational contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christofer Rydenfält
- Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Faculty of Engineering, P.O. Box 118, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Johanna Persson
- Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Faculty of Engineering, P.O. Box 118, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir
- Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Faculty of Engineering, P.O. Box 118, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Roger Larsson
- Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Faculty of Engineering, P.O. Box 118, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Gerd Johansson
- Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Faculty of Engineering, P.O. Box 118, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sanford N, Lavelle M, Markiewicz O, Reedy G, Rafferty AM, Darzi A, Anderson JE. Understanding complex work using an extension of the resilience CARE model: an ethnographic study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1126. [PMID: 36068564 PMCID: PMC9450258 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08482-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Resilient Healthcare research centres on understanding and improving quality and safety in healthcare. The Concepts for Applying Resilience Engineering (CARE) model highlights the relationships between demand, capacity, work-as-done, work-as-imagined, and outcomes, all of which are central aspects of Resilient Healthcare theory. However, detailed descriptions of the nature of misalignments and the mechanisms used to adapt to them are still unknown. Objective The objectives were to identify and classify types of misalignments between demand and capacity and types of adaptations that were made in response to misalignments. Methods The study involved 88.5 hours of non-participant ethnographic observations in a large, teaching hospital in central London. The wards included in the study were: two surgical wards, an older adult ward, a critical care unit, and the Acute Assessment Unit (AAU), an extension unit created to expedite patient flow out of the Emergency Department. Data were collected via observations of routine clinical work and ethnographic interviews with healthcare professionals during the observations. Field notes were transcribed and thematically analysed using a combined deductive-inductive approach based on the CARE model. Results A total of 365 instances of demand-capacity misalignment were identified across the five wards included in the study. Of these, 212 had at least one observed corresponding work adaptation. Misalignments identified include equipment, staffing, process, communication, workflow, and space. Adaptations identified include process, resource redistribution, and extra-role performance. For all misalignment types observed across the five in-patient settings, process adaptations were the most frequently used adaptations. The exception to this was for staffing misalignments, which were most frequently responded to with extra-role performance adaptations. Of the three process adaptations, hospital workers most often adapted by changing how the process was done. Conclusions This study contributes a new version of the CARE model that includes types of misalignments and corresponding adaptations, which can be used to better understand work-as-done. This affords insight into the complexity of the system and how it might be improved by reducing misalignments via work system redesign or by enhancing adaptive capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Sanford
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College, James Clerk Maxwell Building 1.32, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
| | - Mary Lavelle
- School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.,NIHR Patient Safety and Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ola Markiewicz
- NIHR Patient Safety and Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gabriel Reedy
- Centre for Education, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anne Marie Rafferty
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College, James Clerk Maxwell Building 1.32, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- NIHR Patient Safety and Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Janet E Anderson
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fagerdal B, Lyng HB, Guise V, Anderson JE, Thornam PL, Wiig S. Exploring the role of leaders in enabling adaptive capacity in hospital teams - a multiple case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:908. [PMID: 35831857 PMCID: PMC9281060 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08296-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resilient healthcare research studies how healthcare systems and stakeholders adapt and cope with challenges and changes to enable high quality care. Team leaders are seen as central in coordinating clinical care, but research detailing their contributions in supporting adaptive capacity has been limited. This study aims to explore and describe how leaders enable adaptive capacity in hospital teams. METHODS This article reports from a multiple embedded case study in two Norwegian hospitals. A case was defined as one hospital containing four different types of teams in a hospital setting. Data collection used triangulation of observation and interviews with leaders, followed by a qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Leaders contribute in several ways to enhance their teams' adaptive capacity. This study identified four key enablers; (1) building sufficient competence in the teams; (2) balancing workload, risk, and staff needs; (3) relational leadership; and (4) emphasising situational understanding and awareness through timely and relevant information. CONCLUSION Team leaders are key actors in everyday healthcare systems and facilitate organisational resilience by supporting adaptive capacity in hospital teams. We have developed a new framework of key leadership enablers that need to be integrated into leadership activities and approaches along with a strong relational and contextual understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birte Fagerdal
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, N-5021, Norway.
| | - Hilda Bø Lyng
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Veslemøy Guise
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Janet E Anderson
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Alfred and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | | | - Siri Wiig
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
In this study we identify the differences in goal realisation when applying two conflicting paradigms regarding rule perception and management. We gathered more than 30 scenarios where goal conflicts were apparent in a military operational unit. We found that operators repetitively utilized certain routines in executing their tasks in an effort to realize several conflicting goals. These routines were not originally intended nor designed into the rules and not explicitly included in documentation. They were not necessarily at odds with the literal wording and/or the intent of rules and regulations, although we did find examples of this. Our data showed that local ingenuity was created innovatively within the frame of existing rules or kept invisible to those outside the unit. The routines were introduced and passed on informally, and we found no evidence of testing for the introduction of new risks, no migration into the knowledge base of the organisation, and no dissemination as new best practices. An explanation for this phenomenon was found in the fact that the military organisation was applying a top-down, classical, rational approach to rules. In contrast, the routines were generated by adopting a constructivist view of rules as dynamic, local, situated constructions with operators as experts. The results of this study suggest that organisations are more effective in solving goal conflicts and creating transparency on local ingenuity if they adopt a constructivist paradigm instead of, or together with, a classical paradigm.
Collapse
|