Estudio comparativo entre azatioprina oral y pulsos intravenosos de ciclofosfamida en el tratamiento de la fibrosis pulmonar idiopática

Mycophenolate and azathioprine efficacy in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) are immunomodulatory treatments in interstitial lung disease (ILD). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MMF or AZA on pulmonary function in ILD.

DESIGN

Population included any ILD diagnosis, intervention included MMF or AZA treatment, outcome was delta change from baseline in per cent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) and gas transfer (diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide, %DLco). The primary endpoint compared outcomes relative to placebo comparator, the secondary endpoint assessed outcomes in treated groups only.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies were included. No language restrictions were applied. Retrospective studies and studies with high-dose concomitant steroids were excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The systematic search was performed on 9 May. Meta-analyses according to drug and outcome were specified with random effects, I2 evaluated heterogeneity and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation evaluated certainty of evidence. Primary endpoint analysis was restricted to RCT design, secondary endpoint included subgroup analysis according to prospective observational or RCT design.

RESULTS

A total of 2831 publications were screened, 12 were suitable for quantitative synthesis. Three MMF RCTs were included with no significant effect on the primary endpoints (%FVC 2.94, 95% CI -4.00 to 9.88, I2=79.3%; %DLco -2.03, 95% CI -4.38 to 0.32, I2=0.0%). An overall 2.03% change from baseline in %FVC (95% CI 0.65 to 3.42, I2=0.0%) was observed in MMF, and RCT subgroup summary estimated a 4.42% change from baseline in %DLCO (95% CI 2.05 to 6.79, I2=0.0%). AZA studies were limited. All estimates were considered very low certainty evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

There were limited RCTs of MMF or AZA and their benefit in ILD was of very low certainty. MMF may support preservation of pulmonary function, yet confidence in the effect was weak. To support high certainty evidence, RCTs should be designed to directly assess MMF efficacy in ILD.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023423223.

Sustained Treatment Response after Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in a Patient with Therapy-Resistant COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Case Report

Treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents a severe complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and is often challenging in intensive care treatment. Potential positive effects of intravenous cyclophosphamide have been reported in interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). However, there are no data on the use of high-dose cyclophosphamide in therapy-resistant COVID-19 ARDS. We report the case of a 32-year-old male patient admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Medical University of Vienna due to severe COVID-19 ARDS who required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with a total runtime of 85 days. Despite all these therapeutic efforts, he remained in a condition of therapy-resistant ARDS. Unfortunately, the patient was denied for lung transplantation. However, a significant improvement in his respiratory condition was achieved after the administration of an intravenous regimen of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone. After a period of consecutive stabilization, the patient was transferred to the normal ward after 125 days of intensive care treatment. There is a substantial lack of therapeutic options in therapy-resistant ARDS. Our case report suggests that cyclophosphamide may represent a new treatment strategy in therapy-resistant ARDS. Due to its severe adverse effect profile, cyclophosphamide should be used after careful evaluation of a patient's general condition.

Prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis without anti-fibrotic therapy: a systematic review

In addition to facilitating healthcare delivery planning, reliable information about prognosis is essential for treatment decisions in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This review aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients with IPF without anti-fibrotic therapy. We included all cohort studies and the placebo arms of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in IPF and follow-up of ≥12 months. Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. A total of 154 cohort studies and 16 RCTs were included. The pooled proportions of mortality were 0.12 (95% CI 0.09–0.14) at 1–2 years, 0.38 (95% CI 0.34–0.42) between 2–5 years, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.78) at ≥5 years. The pooled mean overall survival was 4 years (95% CI 3.7–4.6) for studies with a follow-up duration of 10 years. At <2 years, forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide declined by a mean of 6.76% predicted (95% CI −8.92 −4.61) and 3% predicted (95% CI −5.14 −1.52), respectively. Although heterogeneity was high, subgroup analyses revealed lower pooled proportions of mortality at 1 year in the RCT participants (0.07 (95% CI 0.05–0.09)) versus cohort study participants (0.14 (95% CI 0.12–0.17)). This review provides comprehensive information on the prognosis of IPF, which can inform treatment discussions with patients and comparisons for future studies with new therapies.

Without anti-fibrotic therapy, patients with IPF have a mortality rate of 31% at ≥5 years, and a mean overall survival of 4 years over 10 years of follow-uphttp://bit.ly/2SDiZSb

Usefulness of Cyclophosphamide Pulse Therapy in Interstitial Lung Diseases

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a group of disorders characterised by progressive lung function decline. Stabilisation of lung function under intermittent i.v. cyclophosphamide was shown in patients suffering from systemic sclerosis, yet data in ILD patients are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively evaluate the usefulness of cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in ILD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all patients who received i.v. cyclophosphamide in our centre from 2002 to 2012. Lung function, survival status, and bronchoalveolar lavage cytology were recorded during a follow-up period of 18 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 6 with lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (LIP), 8 with idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), 7 with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD, and 7 with perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-positive ILD (pANCA+ ILD) were included. Patients with LIP and NSIP had the best survival outcome, those with pANCA+ ILD the worst. In the total cohort, we found a significantly higher total lung capacity decline in the year before treatment compared to the year after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis of cyclophosphamide treatment shows a stabilisation of lung function in most patients with fibrotic ILDs, yet prospective studies in clearly defined diagnoses are urgently needed.

[Advances in respiratory health 2010: Techniques and Transplantation Section]

Five articles and an editorial on interventional pneumology were published in Archivos de Bronconeumología. Two of these articles deal with bronchoscopy, one with lung biopsy with cryoprobes, one with thermoplasty in asthma and the last with tracheobronchomalacia. We also review several publications in international journals, with special emphasis on endobronchial ultrasound. Four original articles on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were published in Archivos de Bronconeumología: one special article comparing two treatments and a Cochrane systematic review on the efficacy of non-steroidal drugs in this disease. Finally, we highlight studies in lung transplantation, consisting of 14 publications from different continents and with highly diverse contents: one editorial, one letter to the editor, one procedures manual and nine international publications on donor characteristics, various types of complications, experimental results in the field of preservation, and the casuistics obtained in distinct diseases in which transplantation is an option.

Non-steroid agents for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic progressive lung disease with poor outcome and no effective treatment to date. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2003.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of non-steroid agents in adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register (30 March 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2010), Ovid MEDLINE to March week 5, 2010, EMBASE to week 13, 2010 and PubMed to April 2010, with additional handsearching, including abstracts of international conferences. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised studies comparing non-steroid drugs with placebo or steroids in adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We contacted pharmaceutical companies to obtain missing information, if any. We combined survival outcomes using Peto odds ratios or hazard ratios (HR).

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials involving 10 different drugs were included. Two trials enrolling 1156 patients compared interferon gamma-1beta with placebo: interferon gamma-1beta did not significantly improve survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.64; P = 0.68). Four trials involving 1155 patients compared pirfenidone with placebo. Three trials, conducted in 1046 patients, provided data on progression-free survival: pirfenidone significantly reduced the risk of disease progression by 30% (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.88, P = 0.002). Data on the effect of pirfenidone on pulmonary function could only be assessed for two studies analysing 314 patients. Forced vital capacity or vital capacity was significantly improved by pirfenidone (mean difference 0.08 L, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.13, P = 0.0006).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on available data, partly still unpublished, pirfenidone appears to improve progression-free survival and, to a lesser extent, pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. More data are needed on overall survival and quality of life on treatment. From the studies in this review, interferon gamma-1beta has not been shown to affect survival. Other agents evaluated in single studies either failed to provide evidence for a benefit or need to be assessed in larger randomised controlled trials.