A review of published anticholinergic scales and measures and their applicability in database analyses

What is the best first choice oral drug therapy for OAB?

AIMS

The management of overactive bladder (OAB) involves lifestyle changes and conservative measures in the first instance with the use of liquid/dietary advice, weight loss, and bladder training. Thereafter oral pharmacotherapy is instigated in symptomatic patients. Antimuscarinics and beta 3 agonists form the main classes of drug therapy in this field. Views on what is the best first line OAB treatment is changing based on recent evidence and adverse event profiles of these medications.

METHODS

At the ICI-RS meeting 2023, Bristol, UK this topic was discussed and debated as a proposal. The following article summarizes the concepts presented that day as well as the interactive discussion that took place thereafter.

RESULTS

OAB guidelines are moving in many circumstances to an either antimuscarinic or beta 3 agonist approach based on patient factors. Several studies have raised concerns on the long-term impact of antimuscarinics, in relation to cognition, dementia, cardiovascular events, and mortality all related to antimuscarinic load. Neither antimuscarinics nor beta 3 agonists have good persistence and adherence rates in the medium to long term. Several barriers also exist to prescribing including guidelines recommending utilizing drugs with the lowest acquisition cost and "step therapy." A newer approach to managing OAB is personalized therapy in view of the many possible etiological factors and phenotypes. These concepts are highlighted in this article.

CONCLUSIONS

Current oral pharmacotherapy in managing OAB is limited by adverse events, adherence and persistence problems. Both antimuscarinics and beta 3 agonists are efficacious but most clinical trials demonstrate significant placebo effects in this field. Personalizing treatment to the individual seems a logical approach to OAB. There is a need for better treatments and further studies are required of existing treatments with high quality longer term outcomes.

Medications and cognitive risk in Aboriginal primary care: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are ageing with high rates of comorbidity, yet little is known about suboptimal prescribing in this population.

AIM

The prevalence of potentially suboptimal prescribing and associated risk factors were investigated among older patients attending primary care through Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs).

METHODS

Medical records of 420 systematically selected patients aged ≥50 years attending urban, rural and remote health services were audited. Polypharmacy (≥ 5 prescribed medications), potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) as per Beers Criteria and anticholinergic burden (ACB) were estimated and associated risk factors were explored with logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of polypharmacy, PIMs and ACB score ≥3 was 43%, 18% and 12% respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, polypharmacy was less likely in rural (odds ratio (OR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.77) compared to urban patients, and more likely in those with heart disease (OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.62-4.25), atrial fibrillation (OR = 4.25, 95% CI = 1.08-16.81), hypertension (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.34-3.44), diabetes (OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.69-4.39) or depression (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.19-3.06). PIMs were more frequent in females (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.03-3.42) and less frequent in rural (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19-0.85) and remote (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.29-1.18) patients. Factors associated with PIMs were kidney disease (OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.37-4.92), urinary incontinence (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.02-8.83), depression (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 1.50-4.77), heavy alcohol use (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.39-5.75) and subjective cognitive concerns (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.31-5.52). High ACB was less common in rural (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.03-0.34) and remote (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.25-1.04) patients and more common in those with kidney disease (OR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.50-6.30) or depression (OR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.70-6.47).

CONCLUSION

Associations between potentially suboptimal prescribing and depression or cognitive concerns highlight the importance of considering medication review and deprescribing for these patients.

Cumulative Anticholinergic Burden and its Predictors among Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease Initiating Cholinesterase Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Cumulative anticholinergic burden refers to the cumulative effect of multiple medications with anticholinergic properties. However, concomitant use of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and anticholinergic burden can nullify the benefit of the treatment and worsen Alzheimer's disease (AD). A literature gap exists regarding the extent of the cumulative anticholinergic burden and associated risk factors in AD. Therefore, this study evaluated the prevalence and predictors of cumulative anticholinergic burden among patients with AD initiating ChEIs.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted using the Medicare claims data involving parts A, B, and D from 2013 to 2017. The study sample included older adults (65 years and older) diagnosed with AD and initiating ChEIs (donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine). The cumulative anticholinergic burden was calculated based on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale and patient-specific dosing using the defined daily dose over the 1 year follow-up period after ChEI initiation. Incremental anticholinergic burden levels were dichotomized into moderate-high (sum of standardized daily anticholinergic exposure over a year (TSDD) score ≥ 90) versus low-no (score 0-89). The Andersen Behavioral Model was used as the conceptual framework for selecting the predictors under the predisposing, enabling, and need categories. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the predictors of high-moderate versus low-no cumulative anticholinergic burden. A multinomial logistic regression model was also used to determine the factors associated with patients having moderate and high burdens compared to low/no burdens.

RESULTS

The study included 222,064 older adults with AD with incident ChEI use (mean age 82.24 ± 7.29, 68.9% females, 83.6% White). Overall, 80.48% had some anticholinergic burden during the follow-up, with 36.26% patients with moderate (TSDD scores 90-499), followed by 24.76% high (TSDD score > 500), and 19.46% with low (TSDD score 1-89) burden categories. Predisposing factors such as age; African American, Asian, or Hispanic race; and need factors included comorbidities such as dyslipidemia, syncope, delirium, fracture, pneumonia, epilepsy, and claims-based frailty index were less likely to be associated with the moderate-high anticholinergic burden. The factors that increased the odds of moderate-high burden were predisposing factors such as female sex; enabling factors such as dual eligibility and diagnosis year; and need factors such as baseline burden, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, depression, insomnia, urinary incontinence, irritable bowel syndrome, anxiety, muscle spasm, gastroesophageal reflux disease, heart failure, and dysrhythmia. Most of these findings remained consistent with multinomial logistic regression.  CONCLUSION: Four out of five older adults with AD had some level of anticholinergic burden, with over 60% having moderate-high anticholinergic burden. Several predisposing, enabling, and need factors were associated with the cumulative anticholinergic burden. The study findings suggest a critical need to minimize the cumulative anticholinergic burden to improve AD care.

Changes in Anticholinergic Burden in Parkinson's Disease After Deep Brain Stimulation

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on anticholinergic burden in Parkinson's disease (PD) and the association of anticholinergic burden with cognition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review in patients with PD who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS from 2010 to 2020 reviewed medications with anticholinergic burden at baseline, six months, and one year (N = 216) after surgery. The cumulative anticholinergic burden at each visit was calculated using the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS).

RESULTS

ARS scores were significantly lower for patients six months and one year after surgery than at baseline (z = 6.58, p < 0.0001; z = 6.99, p < 0.0001). Change in ARS scores at both six months and one year were driven by down-titration of PD medications (z = 9.35, p < 0.0001; z = 8.61, p < 0.0001), rather than changes in pain, psychiatric, or urinary medications with anticholinergic effects. There was no significant difference in change in ARS scores at one year between targets (t = 0.41, p = 0.68). In addition, there was no significant association between anticholinergic burden and cognitive performance.

CONCLUSION

GPi and STN DBS are associated with decreased anticholinergic burden due to PD medications in the first year after surgery.

Herb-drug interactions: A short review on central and peripheral nervous system drugs

Herbal medicines are widely perceived as natural and safe remedies. However, their concomitant use with prescribed drugs is a common practice, often undertaken without full awareness of the potential risks and frequently without medical supervision. This practice introduces a tangible risk of herb-drug interactions, which can manifest as a spectrum of consequences, ranging from acute, self-limited reactions to unpredictable and potentially lethal scenarios. This review offers a comprehensive overview of herb-drug interactions, with a specific focus on medications targeting the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems. Our work draws upon a broad range of evidence, encompassing preclinical data, animal studies, and clinical case reports. We delve into the intricate pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics underpinning each interaction, elucidating the mechanisms through which these interactions occur. One pressing issue that emerges from this analysis is the need for updated guidelines and sustained pharmacovigilance efforts. The topic of herb-drug interactions often escapes the attention of both consumers and healthcare professionals. To ensure patient safety and informed decision-making, it is imperative that we address this knowledge gap and establish a framework for continued monitoring and education. In conclusion, the use of herbal remedies alongside conventional medications is a practice replete with potential hazards. This review not only underscores the real and significant risks associated with herb-drug interactions but also underscores the necessity for greater awareness, research, and vigilant oversight in this often-overlooked domain of healthcare.

Pharmcokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for the anticholinergic burden scale of drugs

Older adults frequently have many systemic diseases that require treatment with multiple drugs, and thus anticholinergic adverse effect by polypharmacy is a significant concern in the management of older adults. The accuracy of the anticholinergic burden rating may be increased by considering pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors such as biophase drug concentrations, the pharmacologically active metabolites formed after drug administration, and muscarinic receptor-mediated effects. Therefore, a pharmacological evidence-based burden scale that considers pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors is expected to be a more optimal tool for precisely assessing the anticholinergic burden, specifically risk reductions in anticholinergic adverse events in the poly-medicated elderly. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 81-87.

Association of systemic anticholinergic medication use and accelerated decrease in lung function in older adults

Older adults are frequently exposed to medicines with systemic anticholinergic properties, which are linked to increased risk of negative health outcomes. The association between systemic anticholinergics and lung function has not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate if exposure to systemic anticholinergics influences lung function in older adults. Participants of the southernmost centres of the Swedish National study on Aging and Care (SNAC) were followed from 2001 to 2021. In total, 2936 subjects (2253 from Good Aging in Skåne and 683 from SNAC-B) were included. An extensive medical examination including spirometry assessments was performed during the study visits. The systemic anticholinergic burden was described using the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale. The effect of new use of systemic anticholinergics on the annual change in forced expiratory volume (FEV1s) was estimated using mixed models. During follow-up, 802 (27.3%) participants were exposed to at least one systemic anticholinergic medicine. On average, the FEV1s of participants without systemic anticholinergic exposure decreased 37.2 ml/year (95% CI [33.8; 40.6]) while participants with low and high exposure lose 47.2 ml/year (95% CI [42.4; 52.0]) and 43.7 ml/year (95% CI [25.4; 62.0]). A novel association between new use of medicines with systemic anticholinergic properties and accelerated decrease in lung function in older adults was found. The accelerated decrease is comparable to that observed in smokers. Studies are needed to further explore this potential side effect of systemic anticholinergics.

Risks of Dementia After Treatment with an Anticholinergic, Beta-3 Agonist, or Combination of Both for an Overactive Bladder: A Korean National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

An overactive bladder (OAB) is primarily managed with behavioural therapy and using anticholinergics and beta-3 agonists. Reports have shown that the use of anticholinergics by OAB patients was associated with an increased risk of new-onset dementia compared with those using beta-3 agonists. This study compares the risks of dementia among patients with an OAB starting on a beta-3 agonist alone, an anticholinergic alone, or a combination treatment.

METHODS

Using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we studied a nationwide population cohort comprising patients newly diagnosed with an OAB who initiated their OAB medications between 2015 and 2020. The treatment types were categorised as anticholinergics (oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine, trospium, fesoterodine, flavoxate, and propiverine) alone, a beta-3 agonist (mirabegron) alone, and combination therapy (an anticholinergic plus the beta-3 agonist). To evaluate the impact of cumulative drug exposure, we quantified the cumulative exposure to solifenacin and mirabegron as cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs) using proportional hazards regression analyses, adjusted for factors known to be associated with dementia.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Among the study's 3 452 705 patients, 671 974 were new users of a beta-3 agonist alone (19.5%), 1 943 414 new users of anticholinergics alone (56.3%), and 837 317 receiving combination therapy (24.3%). The most common anticholinergic used both alone and as part of a combination treatment was solifenacin (42.9% and 56.3%, respectively). There was an increased risk of dementia between the users of an anticholinergic alone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.213; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.195-1.232) and those taking a combination treatment (aHR = 1.345; 95% CI, 1.323-1.366) compared with the users of beta-3 agonists alone after the adjustment of covariates. However, the incidence of dementia was also significantly higher, with an increase in the cumulative dose of mirabegron (aHR = 1.062 [1.021-1.106] for 28-120 cDDDs and aHR = 1.044 [1.004-1.084)] for patients who received >121 cDDDs compared with those who received <27 cDDDs). A marked increased risk of dementia was associated with the use of solifenacin, tolterodine, fesoterodine, and propiverine, both separately and in combination with mirabegron.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In this large Korean cohort, the use of anticholinergics with or without a beta-3 agonist increased the risk of new-onset dementia compared with the use of a beta-3 agonist alone. Given that the risk of dementia was most significantly elevated with combination treatments, care should be taken when considering combination treatment for OAB patients with risk factors for dementia. Furthermore, there could be a possible association between beta-3 agonists and dementia, although future studies are needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study investigated the risk of dementia induced by overactive bladder (OAB) treatment in a large Korean cohort. Two representative OAB treatment drugs, anticholinergics and beta-3 agonists, both increased the risk of new-onset dementia. Clinicians should be cautious in using OAB treatment drugs since no drugs could be concluded as safe.

Use of different anticholinergic scales and their correlation with anticholinergic symptom burden in a cohort of people living with HIV

OBJECTIVES

How to detect the clinical impact of anticholinergic (AC) burden in people with HIV (PWH) remains poorly investigated. We cross-sectionally described the prevalence and type of AC signs/symptoms and the screening accuracy of three AC scales in detecting their presence in a modern cohort of PWH.

METHODS

We calculated AC Burden Scale (ABS), AC Risk Score (ARS) and AC Drug Score (ADS) in 721 adult PWH and recorded the presence of AC signs/symptoms over the previous 3 months. High AC risk was defined by ABS score ≥2, and ARS or ADS score ≥3. Comparisons among the scale were based on Cohen's inter-rater agreement, and their screening accuracy was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and performance measures.

RESULTS

We enrolled 721 PWH, of whom 72.0% of participants were male; the median age was 53 years, and 164 participants (22.7%) were on at least one AC drug. Among these, 28.6% experienced at least one AC sign/symptom. Agreement in AC risk classification was substantial only between ARS and ADS (k = 0.6). Lower and higher risk of AC signs/symptoms was associated with dual regimens [adjusted OR (aOR) = 0.12 versus three-drug regimens, P = 0.002] and increasing number of AC drugs (aOR = 12.91, P < 0.001). Depression and COPD were also associated with higher risk of AC signs/symptoms in analysis unadjusted for number of AC drugs. ABS and ADS showed the best area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.85 (0.78-0.92) and 0.84 (0.75-0.92; P < 0.001 for both). However, at the cut-off used for the general population, the sensitivity of all three scales was very low (34.0%, 46.8% and 46.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to one-fourth of participants in our cohort were exposed to at least one AC drug, and among them AC signs/symptoms affected more than one-fourth. Both polypharmacy (as number of antiretrovirals and of co-medications with AC properties) and to a lesser extent specific comorbidities shaped the risk of developing AC signs/symptoms. Sensitive screenings for AC risk in PWH should prefer ABS or ADS based on lower cut-offs than those suggested for the general population.

Low-Income Older Adults' Vulnerability to Anticholinergic Medication-Associated Frailty

BACKGROUND

A growing body of research supports the negative impact of anticholinergic drug burden on physical frailty. However, prior research has been limited to homogeneous white European populations, and few studies have evaluated how anticholinergic burden tools compare in their measurement function and reliability with minority community-dwelling adult populations. This study investigated the association between anticholinergic drug exposure and frailty by conducting a sensitivity analysis using multiple anticholinergic burden tools in a diverse cohort.

METHODS

A comprehensive psychometric approach was used to assess the performance of five clinical Anticholinergic Burden Tools: Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), average daily dose, total standardized daily doses (TSDD), and Cumulative Anticholinergic Burden scale (CAB). Spearman correlation matrix and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the association among the variables. Ordinal logistic regression is used to evaluate the anticholinergic burden measured by each scale to determine the prediction of frailty. Model performance is determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The cohort included 80 individuals (mean age 69 years; 55.7% female, 71% African American). All anticholinergic burden tools were highly correlated (p < 0.001), ICC3 0.66 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.73). Among individuals prescribed anticholinergics, 33% were robust, 44% were prefrail, and 23% were frail. All five tools predicted prefrail and frail status (p < 0.05) with low model misclassification rates for frail individuals (AUC range 0.78-0.85).

CONCLUSION

Anticholinergic burden tools evaluated in this cohort of low-income African American older adults were highly correlated and predicted prefrail and frail status. Findings indicate that clinicians can select the appropriate instrument for the clinic setting and research question while maintaining confidence that all five tools will produce reliable results. Future anticholinergic research is needed to unravel the association between interventions such as deprescribing on incident frailty in longitudinal data.

Anticholinergic medications associated with falls and frailty in people with HIV

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic medications (ACMs) are associated with poorer age-related outcomes, including falls and frailty. We investigate associations between ACM use and recurrent falls and frailty among older (aged ≥50 years) people with HIV in the POPPY study.

METHODS

Anticholinergic potential of co-medications at study entry was coded using the anticholinergic burden score, anticholinergic risk score, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network score; drugs scoring ≥1 on any scale were defined as ACM. Associations with recurrent falls (two or more falls in the previous 28 days) and frailty (modified Fried's) were assessed using logistic regression adjusting for (1) possible demographic/lifestyle confounders and (2) clinical factors and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9).

RESULTS

ACM use was reported by 193 (28%) of 699 participants, with 64 (9%) receiving two or more ACM; commonly prescribed ACMs were codeine (12%), citalopram (12%), loperamide (9%), and amitriptyline (7%). Falls were reported in 63/673 (9%), and 126/609 (21%) met the frailty criteria. Both recurrent falls and frailty were more common in ACM users than in non-users (recurrent falls: 17% in users vs. 6% in non-users, p < 0.001; frailty: 32% vs. 17%, respectively, p < 0.001). Use of two or more ACMs was associated with increased odds of falls after adjustment for demographic/lifestyle factors (odds ratio [OR] 4.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06-9.98) and for clinical factors (OR 3.58; 95% CI 1.37-9.38). Similar albeit weaker associations were seen with frailty (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.09-4.70 and OR 2.12; 95% CI 0.89-5.0, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

ACM are commonly prescribed for people living with HIV, and evidence exists for an association with recurrent falls and frailty. Clinicians should be alert to this and reduce ACM exposure where possible.

Effect of anticholinergic burden on brain activity during Working Memory and real-world functioning in patients with schizophrenia

Cognitive impairment has been associated with poor real-world functioning in patients with Schizophrenia. Previous studies have shown that pharmacological treatment with anticholinergic properties may contribute to cognitive impairment in Schizophrenia. We investigated the effect of the anticholinergic burden (ACB) on brain activity, cognition, and real-world functioning in Schizophrenia. We hypothesized that greater ACB would be associated with altered brain activity along with poorer cognitive performance and lower real-world functioning. A sample of 100 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was recruited in the naturalistic multicenter study of the Italian Network for Research on Psychoses (NIRP) across 7 centres. For each participant, ACB was evaluated using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale. The association of ACB with brain function was assessed using BOLD fMRI during the N-Back Working Memory (WM) task in a nested cohort (N = 31). Real-world functioning was assessed using the Specific Level of Functioning (SLOF) scale. Patients with high ACB scores (≥3) showed lower brain activity in the WM frontoparietal network (TFCE corrected alpha <0.05) and poorer cognitive performance (p = 0.05) than patients with low ACB scores (<3). Both effects were unaffected by demographic characteristics, clinical severity, and antipsychotic dosage. Moreover, patients with high ACB showed poorer real-world functioning than patients with lower ACB (p = 0.03). Our results suggest that ACB in Schizophrenia is associated with impaired WM and abnormal underlying brain function along with reduced real-world functioning. Clinical practice should consider the potential adverse cognitive effects of ACB in the treatment decision-making process.

The relationship between dry eye disease and anticholinergic burden

PURPOSE

Anticholinergic drugs are widely prescribed for many medical conditions. However, data on the association of anticholinergic burden with dry eye disease (DED) are limited. In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between anticholinergic burden and DED.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated a total of 120 participants who underwent ophthalmological examination between February 2021 and February 2022. The drugs used by the patients in the last 2 months were recorded from the institute's electronic data system. Anticholinergic burden was assessed using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale.

RESULTS

The mean age of those patients was 59.0 ± 11.6 years and more than half (n = 33, 64.7%) were women. Patients with DED had significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index scores (p = 0.01), lower Schirmer test values (p = 0.01), higher Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores (p = 0.01), and higher anticholinergic burden (p = 0.01). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between ACB and OSDI scores (r = 0.22, p = 0.02) and a negative correlation between ACB scores and Schirmer test values (r = -0.46, p = 0.01). After adjusting for potential confounding factors (age, gender, and comorbidities), each 1-point increase in anticholinergic burden was found to result in a 2.97-fold increase in the risk of DED (OR: 2.97, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-7.24, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Anticholinergic burden appears to be associated with DED. Therefore, greater caution in prescribing anticholinergic drugs for adult patients may be important in reducing the rates of many adverse outcomes.

The Prognostic Utility of Anticholinergic Burden Scales: An Integrative Review and Gap Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic drugs are commonly prescribed, especially to older adults. Anticholinergic burden scales (ABS) have been used to evaluate the cumulative effects of multiple anticholinergics. However, studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the association between anticholinergic burden assessed with ABS and adverse clinical outcomes such as cognitive impairment, functional decline, and frailty. This review aims to identify gaps in research on the development, validation, and evaluation of ABS, and provide recommendations for future studies.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, CENTRAL) was conducted for relevant studies published from inception until 25 May 2023. Two reviewers screened for eligibility and assessed the quality of studies using different tools based on the study design and stage of the review framework. Research evidence was evaluated, and gaps were identified and grouped into evidence, knowledge, and methodological gaps, using evidence tables to summarize data.

RESULTS

Several evidence, knowledge, and methodological gaps in existing development, validation, and evaluation studies of ABS were identified. There is no universally accepted scale, and there is a need to define a clinically relevant threshold for measuring total anticholinergic burden. The current evidence has limitations, underrepresenting low- and middle-income countries, younger individuals, and populations with cognitive disabilities. The impact of anticholinergic burden on frailty is also understudied. Existing evaluation studies provide limited evidence on the benefit of reducing anticholinergic burden on clinical outcomes or the safety of anticholinergic deprescribing. There is also uncertainty regarding optimal reduction, clinically significant anticholinergic burden thresholds, and cost effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research recommendations to bridge knowledge gaps include developing a risk assessment framework, refining ABS scales, establishing a standardized consensus scale, and creating a longitudinal measure of cumulative anticholinergic risk. Strategies to minimize bias, consider frailty, and promote multidisciplinary and multinational collaborations are also necessary to improve patient outcomes.

Development of the Swedish anticholinergic burden scale (Swe-ABS)

BACKGROUND

Drugs with anticholinergic properties are associated with cognitive adverse effects, especially in patients vulnerable to central muscarinic antagonism. A variety of drugs show weak, moderate or strong anticholinergic effects. Therefore, the cumulative anticholinergic burden should be considered in patients with cognitive impairment. This study aimed to develop a Swedish Anticholinergic Burden Scale (Swe-ABS) to be used in health care and research.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed and Ovid Embase to identify previously published tools quantifying anticholinergic drug burden (i.e., exposure). Drugs and grading scores (0-3, no to high anticholinergic activity) were extracted from identified lists. Enteral and parenteral drugs authorized in Sweden were included. Drugs with conflicting scores in the existing lists were assessed by an expert group. Two drugs that were not previously assessed were also added to the evaluation process.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search identified the following nine anticholinergic burden scales: Anticholinergic Activity Scale, Anticholinergic Burden Classification, updated Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale, Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Load Scale, Anticholinergic Risk Scale, updated Clinician-rated Anticholinergic Scale, German Anticholinergic Burden Scale and Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale. A list of drugs with significant anticholinergic effects provided by The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare was included in the process. The suggested Swe-ABS consists of 104 drugs scored as having weak, moderate or strong anticholinergic effects. Two hundred and fifty-six drugs were listed as having no anticholinergic effects based on evaluation in previous scales. In total, 62 drugs were assessed by the expert group.

CONCLUSIONS

Swe-ABS is a simplified method to quantify the anticholinergic burden and is easy to use in clinical practice. Publication of this scale might make clinicians more aware of drugs with anticholinergic properties and patients' total anticholinergic burden. Further research is needed to validate the Swe-ABS and evaluate anticholinergic exposure versus clinically significant outcomes.

Cognitive effects of individual anticholinergic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anticholinergics (ACs) are among the most prescribed drugs. Investigating the impaired cognitive domains due to individual ACs usage is associated with controversial findings.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of individual ACs on different aspects of cognitive function based on clinical trial studies.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA statement. A systematic search was performed in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists and the meta-analysis was performed using the CMA software.

Results

Out of 3,026 results of searching, 138 studies were included. A total of 38 studies that assess the cognitive impacts of scopolamine were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies reported cognitive effects of scopolamine, mecamylamine, atropine, biperiden, oxybutynin, trihexyphenidyl, benzhexol, and dicyclomine; however, glycopyrrolate, trospium, tolterodine, darifenacin, fesoterodine, tiotropium, and ipratropium were not associated with cognitive decline. Based on the meta-analyses, scopolamine was associated with reduced recognition (SDM -1.84; 95%CI -2.48 to -1.21; p<0.01), immediate recall (SDM -1.82; 95%CI -2.35 to -1.30; p<0.01), matching to sample (SDM -1.76; 95%CI -2.57 to -0.96; p<0.01), delayed recall (SDM -1.54; 95%CI -1.97 to -1.10; p<0.01), complex memory tasks (SDM -1.31; 95%CI -1.78 to -0.84; p<0.01), free recall (SDM -1.18; 95%CI -1.63 to -0.73; p<0.01), cognitive function (SDM -0.95; 95%CI -1.46 to -0.44; p<0.01), attention (SDM -0.85; 95%CI -1.38 to -0.33; p<0.01), and digit span (SDM -0.65; 95%CI -1.21 to -0.10; p=0.02). There was a high RoB in our included study, especially in terms of dealing with possible cofounders.

Conclusion

The limitations of this study suggest a need for more well-designed studies with a longer duration of follow-up on this topic to reach more reliable evidence.

The Cumulative Use of Muscle Relaxants and the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease: A Nationwide Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Use of pharmacological treatments is one possible modifiable risk factor for cognitive disorders.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if the use of muscle relaxants is associated with the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

The study was performed in a nested case-control design. Altogether 70,718 community-dwelling residents of Finland who received AD diagnosis in 2005-2011 were included as cases (the MEDALZ study). Each case was matched with four controls without AD by age, sex, and region of residence (N = 282,858). Data was extracted from Prescription register (1995-2012), Special Reimbursement register (1972-2012), and Hospital Discharge register (1972-2012). Drug use periods were modeled with PRE2DUP-method. Defined daily dose (DDD) was used to quantify the use. Analyses were conducted for any muscle relaxant use, and drug specific analyses were done for orphenadrine and tizanidine. A five-year lag window prior to the diagnosis was used, and results analyzed with conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

The use of any muscle relaxant was associated with the risk of AD, aOR (95% CI) 1.04 (1.02-1.07). Stronger associations were observed with longer use (>366 days, aOR 1.12 (1.03-1.21)) than shorter use (1-365 days aOR, 1.04 (1.02-1.06)) compared to non-users. Dose-response was not observed. Tizanidine was not associated with AD, whereas cumulative exposure of orphenadrine (≥101 DDDs) was associated with the risk of AD, aOR 1.19 (1.07-1.32).

CONCLUSION

Muscle relaxant use was associated with the risk of AD and higher exposure to orphenadrine showed increased risk. Further studies on higher doses and longer durations of use are warranted.

Polypharmacy Interactions Impacting Methacholine Challenge Testing for Asthma Assessment in Older People

Objective To investigate potential reasons for unusually high incidence of negative Methacholine Challenge Tests (MCT), following standardized MCT medication-hold protocol, in older people with physician-diagnosed asthma. Design An analysis of a longitudinal observational parent study of asthma. Setting Community-dwelling participants were evaluated in an outpatient clinic and at home. Participants Screening inclusion criteria for the parent study included 60 years of age or older, physician diagnosis of asthma, and a positive response to at least one of six asthma screening questions. Participants were enrolled in the study if they also demonstrate either: (1) a postbronchodilator administration response showing an increase of at least 12% and 200 mL in forced expiratory volume or an increase of at least 12% and 200 mL in forced vital capacity, or (2) an MCT result of PC20 ≤ 16 mg/mL (indicating bronchial hyper-responsiveness, MCT positive). Exclusion criteria included diagnosis of cognitive impairment or dementia, residing in a long-term care facility, more than 20 pack/ year smoking history or a history of smoking within the previous five years, inability to perform pulmonary function testing maneuvers, and a Prognostic Index score of greater than 10. Interventions Analysis of participant data for non-medication- and medication-exposure factors for association with negative MCT results. Results Anticholinergic burden and statin use were positively associated with negative MCT. Conclusion Medications not accounted for in medication-hold protocols, and concurrently in use, may impact clinical tests and outcomes.

Overactive Bladder and Cognitive Impairment: The American Urogynecologic Society and Pelvic Floor Disorders Research Foundation State-of-the-Science Conference Summary Report

IMPORTANCE

Overactive bladder (OAB) is prevalent in older adults in whom management is complicated by comorbidities and greater vulnerability to the cognitive effects of antimuscarinic medications.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive evidence-based summary of the 2021 State-of-the-Science (SOS) conference and a multidisciplinary expert literature review on OAB and cognitive impairment.

STUDY DESIGN

The American Urogynecologic Society and the Pelvic Floor Disorders Research Foundation convened a 3-day collaborative conference. Experts from multidisciplinary fields examined cognitive function, higher neural control of the OAB patient, risk factors for cognitive impairment in older patients, cognitive effects of antimuscarinic medications for OAB treatment, OAB phenotyping, conservative and advanced OAB therapies, and the need for a multidisciplinary approach to person-centered treatment. Translational topics included the blood-brain barrier, purine metabolome, mechanotransduction, and gene therapy for OAB targets.

RESULTS

Research surrounding OAB treatment efficacy in cognitively impaired individuals is limited. Short- and long-term outcomes regarding antimuscarinic effects on cognition are mixed; however, greater anticholinergic burden and duration of use influence risk. Oxybutynin is most consistently associated with negative cognitive effects in short-term, prospective studies. Although data are limited, beta-adrenergic agonists do not appear to confer the same cognitive risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2021 SOS summary report provides a comprehensive review of the fundamental, translational, and clinical research on OAB with emphasis on cognitive impairment risks to antimuscarinic medications. Duration of use and antimuscarinic type, specifically oxybutynin when examining OAB treatments, appears to have the most cognitive impact; however, conclusions are limited by the primarily cognitively intact population studied. Given current evidence, it appears prudent to minimize anticholinergic burden by emphasizing nonantimuscarinic therapeutic regimens in the older population and/or those with cognitive impairment.

Cholinergic Functioning, Cognition, and Anticholinergic Medication Burden in Schizophrenia

Acetylcholine (ACh) signaling is critical for central nervous function and is known to be abnormal in schizophrenia (SZ), a chronic neuropsychiatric disorder in which cognitive deficits persist, despite treatment. This review provides a summary of the clinical evidence linking ACh abnormalities to SZ-associated cognitive deficits, an overview of ACh-based pro-cognitive strategies attempted in SZ, and a survey of recent studies that describe the impact of anticholinergic medication burden on cognitive outcomes in SZ. Methodological challenges that currently limit more substantial investigation of ACh in SZ patients and future directions are also discussed.

The Twilight Zone: Oxybutynin Overuse Exacerbating Delirium

Anticholinergic medications, such as oxybutynin, are first-line pharmacologic therapies in overactive bladder. However, the cognitive adverse effect profiles of frequently used anticholinergic medications are extensive and limit their use in older patients. Additionally, many older patients continue on anticholinergic therapy if adverse effects are not self-reported by the patient or detected by the provider.Here, we present a case of a 73-year-old male with a history of major neurocognitive disorder, in which unreported oxybutynin overuse led to repeated delirious states, erratic driving, and subsequent psychiatric hospitalizations. During his hospitalizations, he displayed progressively more linear thought processes and improved insight without clear etiology. After a more thorough history of his medication use was obtained, he disclosed that he would often take additional doses of oxybutynin to prevent incontinence during car rides and had done so prior to recent hospitalizations.Our example highlights the importance of thorough history taking, medication review, reducing polypharmacy, careful patient education about medications with psychiatric adverse effects, and, importantly, the avoidance of anticholinergic medication prescription in older patients.

Relapse of first-episode schizophrenia patients and neurocognitive impairment: The role of dopaminergic and anticholinergic burden

BACKGROUND

The prevention of relapse may be a key factor to diminish the cognitive impairment of first-episode schizophrenia (FES) patients. We aimed to ascertain the effects of relapse, and dopaminergic and anticholinergic treatment burdens on cognitive functioning in the follow-up.

METHODS

Ninety-nine FES patients participated in this study. Cognitive assessments were performed at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up or, in those patients who relapsed, after &gt;2 months of stabilization of the new acute psychotic episode. The primary outcomes were final cognitive dimensions.

RESULTS

Repeated measures MANOVA analyses showed improvements in the whole sample on the end-point assessments in processing speed and social cognition. However, only impairment in social cognition showed a significant interaction with relapse by time in this sample. Relapse in FES patients was significantly associated with poor performance on end-point assessments of working memory, social cognition and global cognitive score. Anticholinergic burden, but not dopaminergic burden, was associated with verbal memory impairment. These significant associations resulted after controlling for baseline cognitive functioning, relapse and dopaminergic burden.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between relapse and cognitive impairment in recovered FES patients seems to be particularly complex at the short-term follow-up of these patients. While relapse was associated with working memory, social cognition impairments and global cognitive score, anticholinergic burden might play an additional worsening effect on verbal memory. Thus, tailoring or changing antipsychotics and other drugs to reduce their anticholinergic burden may be a potential modifiable factor to diminish cognitive impairment at this stage of the illness.

A novel Artificial Intelligence-based tool to assess anticholinergic burden: a survey

BACKGROUND

many medications possess anticholinergic activity. Their use is associated with a number of serious adverse effects including cognitive effects. The cumulative anticholinergic effect of medications as assessed by tools such as the anticholinergic burden scale (AchB) can identify people particularly at risk of anticholinergic side-effects. Currently, >20 tools are available for clinicians to use, but there is no consensus on the most appropriate tool.

METHODS

a newly created online tool-International Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Tool (IACT)-based on natural language processing and chemical structure analysis, was developed and made available for clinicians to test its functions. We carried out a survey (between 8th of February and 31st of March 2021) to assess the overall need for an assessment tool as well as the usability of the IACT.

RESULTS

a total of 110 responses were received from different countries and practitioners' groups. The majority of the participants (86.11%) stated they would use a tool for AchB assessment if available and when they were asked to rate the IACT against other tools, amongst 34 responders, 20.59% rated it better and 8.82% rated it significantly better, 44.12% rated it neither better, nor worse, 14.71% rated it worse and 11.76% somewhat worse.

CONCLUSION

there is a need for an anticholinergic burden calculator to assess the anticholinergicity of medications. Tools such as the IACT potentially could meet this demand due to its ability to assign scores to current and new medications appearing on the market based both on their chemical structure and reported adverse pharmacological effects.

[The use of anticholinergic drugs and associated factors in middle-aged adults and the elderly]

The objective of this article was to describe the use of anticholinergic drugs and possible factors associated with their use, in middle-aged adults and in the elderly. This is a cross-sectional study, based on data from a population-based study called VIGICARDIO. All respondents aged 44 or older interviewed in 2015 were included. Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS) was used to determine anticholinergic burden (ACB), categorized as significant (≥3) and non-significant (< 3). Poisson regression was conducted with crude and adjusted analysis to investigate the factors associated with ACB. There was a prevalence of 20.7% of significant ACB among respondents, higher among middle-aged adults (24.1%). After adjusted analysis, significant ACB (≥ 3) remained in the non-elderly age group with polypharmacy and sporadic use of two or more drugs. In the elderly, sporadic use of two or more medications and hospitalization in the last year continued to be associated with significant ACB. The results indicate a higher prevalence of ACB among middle-aged adults, polymedicated and in sporadic use of medications, which suggests that the investigation of the use of anticholinergicsin this age group requires greater attention.

Phenotypic Displays of Cholinergic Enzymes Associate With Markers of Inflammation, Neurofibrillary Tangles, and Neurodegeneration in Pre- and Early Symptomatic Dementia Subjects

Background

Cholinergic drugs are the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Therefore, a better understanding of the cholinergic system and its relation to both AD-related biomarkers and cognitive functions is of high importance.

Objectives

To evaluate the relationships of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cholinergic enzymes with markers of amyloidosis, neurodegeneration, neurofibrillary tangles, inflammation and performance on verbal episodic memory in a memory clinic cohort.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 46 cholinergic drug-free subjects (median age = 71, 54% female, median MMSE = 28) were recruited from an Icelandic memory clinic cohort targeting early stages of cognitive impairment. Enzyme activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) was measured in CSF as well as levels of amyloid-β_1–42 (Aβ₄₂), phosphorylated tau (P-tau), total-tau (T-tau), neurofilament light (NFL), YKL-40, S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Verbal episodic memory was assessed with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning (RAVLT) and Story tests.

Results

No significant relationships were found between CSF Aβ₄₂ levels and AChE or BuChE activity (p > 0.05). In contrast, T-tau (r = 0.46, p = 0.001) and P-tau (r = 0.45, p = 0.002) levels correlated significantly with AChE activity. Although neurodegeneration markers T-tau and NFL did correlate with each other (r = 0.59, p < 0.001), NFL did not correlate with AChE (r = 0.25, p = 0.09) or BuChE (r = 0.27, p = 0.06). Inflammation markers S100B and YKL-40 both correlated significantly with AChE (S100B: r = 0.43, p = 0.003; YKL-40: r = 0.32, p = 0.03) and BuChE (S100B: r = 0.47, p < 0.001; YKL-40: r = 0.38, p = 0.009) activity. A weak correlation was detected between AChE activity and the composite score reflecting verbal episodic memory (r = −0.34, p = 0.02). LASSO regression analyses with a stability approach were performed for the selection of a set of measures best predicting cholinergic activity and verbal episodic memory score. S100B was the predictor with the highest model selection frequency for both AChE (68%) and BuChE (73%) activity. Age (91%) was the most reliable predictor for verbal episodic memory, with selection frequency of both cholinergic enzymes below 10%.

Conclusions

Results indicate a relationship between higher activity of the ACh-degrading cholinergic enzymes with increased neurodegeneration, neurofibrillary tangles and inflammation in the stages of pre- and early symptomatic dementia, independent of CSF Aβ₄₂ levels.

Anticholinergic Medication Burden in Parkinson's Disease Outpatients

BACKGROUND

Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) may be especially vulnerable to future cognitive decline from anticholinergic medications.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize anticholinergic medication burden, determine the co-occurrence of anticholinergic and cholinesterase inhibitors, and to assess the correlations among anticholinergic burden scales in PD outpatients.

METHODS

We studied 670 PD outpatients enrolled in a clinic registry between 2012 and 2020. Anticholinergic burden was measured with the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and Drug Burden Index-Anticholinergic component (DBI-Ach). Correlations between scales were assessed with weighted kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

Between 31.5 to 46.3% of PD patients were taking medications with anticholinergic properties. Among the scales applied, the ACB produced the highest prevalence of medications with anticholinergic properties (46.3%). Considering only medications with definite anticholinergic activity (scores of 2 or 3 on ACB, ADS, or ARS), the most common anticholinergic drug classes were antiparkinsonian (8.2%), antipsychotic (6.4%), and urological (3.3%) medications. Cholinesterase inhibitors and medications with anticholinergic properties were co-prescribed to 5.4% of the total cohort. The most highly correlated scales were ACB and ADS (κ= 0.71), ACB and ARS (κ= 0.67), and ADS and ARS (κ= 0.55).

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of PD patients (20%) were either taking antiparkinsonian, urological, or antipsychotic anticholinergic medications or were co-prescribed anticholinergic medications and cholinesterase inhibitors. By virtue of its detection of a high prevalence of anticholinergic medication usage and its high correlation with other scales, our data support use of the ACB scale to assess anticholinergic burden in PD patients.

Anticholinergics and falls in older adults

INTRODUCTION

The use of medications with anticholinergic (ACh) properties is associated with numerous adverse effects especially in older adults. Emerging evidence suggests the presence of long-term effects with ACh use.

AREAS COVERED

Our article presents an overview of ACh effects and falls in older individuals including examination of emerging evidence on ACh use and cumulative exposure on short-term and long-term falls risk. The databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for articles published from January 2002 to December 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

Anticholinergic side effects include muscle weakness, blurred vision, and mental confusion which are likely to lead to increased falls risk. Many commonly used medications such as beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and antihistamines are now known to have mild ACh properties. With polypharmacy now considered unavoidable in older patients, the cumulative effects of the use of multiple drugs with mild ACh properties may also lead to increased falls risk. The relationship between ACh drugs and falls may also be irreversible as ACh effects may extend beyond the period of drug use, due to cognitive and physical deconditioning following the initial exposure to ACh drugs. Future long-term studies with accurate quantification of cumulative ACh exposure and measurement of actual falls outcomes are urgently required.

Association between anticholinergic burden and dementia in UK Biobank

Background

Previous studies on the relationship between anticholinergic drugs and dementia have reported heterogeneous results. This variability could be due to different anticholinergic scales and differential effects of distinct classes of drugs.

Methods

Using Cox proportional hazards models, we computed the association between annual anticholinergic burden (AChB) and the risk of dementia in UK Biobank with linked general practitioner prescription records between the years 2000 and 2015 (n = 171,775).

Results

AChB according to most anticholinergic scales (standardized odds ratio range: 1.027-1.125) and the slope of the AChB trajectory (hazard ratio = 1.094; 95% confidence interval: 1.068-1.119) were predictive of dementia. However, the association between AChB and dementia held only for some classes of drugs, especially antidepressants, antiepileptics, and antidiuretics.

Discussion

The heterogeneity in previous findings may partially be due to different effects for different classes of drugs. Future studies should establish differences in more detail and further examine the practicality of a general measure of AChB relating to the risk of dementia.

CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale: An Updated Anticholinergic Burden Scale. Comparison with the ACB Scale in Spanish Individuals with Subjective Memory Complaints

The increase in life expectancy has also been accompanied by an increase in the use of medication to treat chronic diseases. Polypharmacy is associated with medication-related problems such as the increase in the anticholinergic burden. Older people are more susceptible to anticholinergic effects on the central nervous system and this, in turn, may be related to cognitive impairment. In this paper, we develop an updated anticholinergic burden scale, the CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale (CALS) via a systematic review of the literature and compare it with the currently most used Anticholinergic Burden Scale (ACB). Our new scale includes 217 different drugs with anticholinergic properties, 129 more than the ACB. Given the effect that anticholinergic medications have on cognitive performance, we then used both scales to investigate the relationship between anticholinergic burden and cognitive impairment in adult Spanish subjects with subjective memory complaint. In our population, we observed an association between cognitive impairment and the anticholinergic burden when measured by the new CALS, but not when the ACB was applied. The use of a more comprehensive and upgraded scale will allow better discrimination of the risk associated with the use of anticholinergic medications on cognitive impairment. CALS can help raise awareness among clinicians of the problems associated with the use of medications, or combinations of them, with large anticholinergic effect, and promote a better personalized pharmacological approach for each patient.

The Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Anticholinergic Burden in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents with Overactive Bladder in the US

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent condition commonly treated with anticholinergic medications. The extent to which anticholinergic burden is associated with costs and healthcare resource use (HCRU) in the long-stay nursing home (LSNH) setting is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This research evaluated the impact of anticholinergic burden on HCRU and related costs among LSNH residents with OAB.

METHODS

This was a cohort study based on 2013-2015 Minimum Data Set-linked Medicare claims data involving LSNH residents aged ≥ 65 years with OAB and having Parts A, B and D coverage 6 months pre- and ≥ 12 months post-nursing home admission date (index date). Cumulative anticholinergic burden was determined using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale and defined daily dose. Direct medical costs related to HCRU were examined. HCRU included inpatient, outpatient, emergency room (ER), and physician office visits. Costs and HCRU associated with levels of anticholinergic burden were evaluated using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

A total of 123,308 LSNH residents with OAB were included in this study. Most residents (87.2%) had some level (12.8%, none; 18.0%, low; 41.9%, moderate; and 27.3%, high) of cumulative anticholinergic burden. Results indicate that all types of resource utilization were higher among those with any level of anticholinergic burden than those with no burden. The outpatient, ER, and physician costs tended to be higher with increasing anticholinergic burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs and HCRU patterns reflected increasing trends with anticholinergic burden. Targeted efforts towards reducing anticholinergic burden among LSNH residents with OAB may result in decreases in costs and HCRU.

The effect of the anticholinergic burden on duration and severity of delirium in older hip-surgery patients with and without haloperidol prophylaxis: A post hoc analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic acting drugs have been associated with delirium in older patients.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the anticholinergic burden (ACB) and the duration and severity of delirium in older hip-surgery patients with or without haloperidol prophylaxis.

METHODS

Older patients with a postoperative delirium following hip surgery from a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of haloperidol prophylaxis on delirium incidence were included in this study. The ACB was quantified using two different tools, the Anticholinergic Drug Scale and an Expert Panel. Using linear regression, the association between the ACB and delirium was analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall delirium duration and severity were not significantly associated with the ACB. Also, no statistically significant differences were found in delirium duration or severity between the placebo and haloperidol treatment groups for the ACB groups. The protective effect of haloperidol on delirium duration and severity however tended to be present in patients with no or a low ACB but not or to a lesser extent in patients with an intermediate to high ACB.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACB was not significantly associated with delirium duration or severity. Haloperidol prophylaxis tended to shorten delirium duration and decrease delirium severity in patients with no or a low ACB. To further explore the influence of anticholinergic acting drugs on delirium duration and severity and the effect of concomitant haloperidol use, additional research with a higher haloperidol dose, a larger study population, and ACB quantification taking drug exposure into account is warranted.

Quantifying Anticholinergic Burden and Sedative Load in Older Adults with Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review of Risk Scales and Models

BACKGROUND

Patients taking medication with high anticholinergic and sedative properties are at increased risk of experiencing poor cognitive and physical outcomes. Therefore, precise quantification of the cumulative burden of their drug regimen is advisable. There is no agreement regarding which scale to use to simultaneously quantify the burden associated with medications.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the strengths and limitations of available tools to quantify medication-related anticholinergic burden and sedative load in older adults. We discuss specific limitations and agreements between currently available scales and models and propose a comprehensive table combining drugs categorized as high, moderate, low, or no anticholinergic or sedative activity as excerpted from the selected studies.

METHODS

A targeted search was carried out using the National Library of Medicine through PubMed using medical subject heading terms and text words around the following search terms: (anticholinergic OR sedative) AND (load OR burden OR scale) for studies published between 1 January 1945 and 5 June 2021. In addition, the following databases were searched using the same terms: MEDLINE-EBSCO, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, OAIster, OVID-MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Screening by titles was followed by an abstract and full-text review. After blind evaluation, agreement between reviewers was reached to establish drug characteristics and categories.

RESULTS

After 3163 articles were identified, 13 were included: 11 assigned risk scores to anticholinergic drugs and two to sedative drugs. Considerable variability between anticholinergic scales was observed; scales included between 27 and 548 drugs. We generated a comprehensive table combining the anticholinergic and sedative activities of drugs evaluated and proposed a categorization of these drugs based on available scientific and clinical evidence. Our table combines information about 642 drugs and categorizes 44, 25, 99, and 474 drugs as high, moderate, low, or no anticholinergic and sedative activity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability and inconsistency exists among scales used to categorize drugs with anticholinergic or sedative burden. In this review, we provide a comprehensive table that proposes a new categorization of these drugs. A longitudinal study will be required to validate the new proposed anticholinergic and sedative burden catalog in an evidence-based manner.

Anticholinergic Burden of Geriatric Ward Inpatients

Background and Objectives: Anticholinergic drug use in the pharmacotherapy of elderly persons is common despite the increased risk of side effects. We examined the prevalence of anticholinergic drug use and total anticholinergic drug burden among patients admitted to an acute care geriatric ward in Poland. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional study of 329 subjects hospitalized at the geriatric ward. Patient condition was assessed with a comprehensive geriatric assessment. The Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale was used to estimate the total anticholinergic load. Results: Mean patient age was 79.61 ± 6.82 years. 40.73% of them were burdened with at least one anticholinergic drug. The clinically significant anticholinergic burden was observed in 13.98% of subjects. Patients with dementia, risk of falls, and severe disability had significantly higher total ACB scores compared to other groups. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve revealed that the total ACB score ≥ 1 was significantly associated with dementia and the risk of falls. Total ACB score ≥ 2 was significantly associated with severe disability. Conclusions: Patients admitted to an acute care geriatric ward had an anticholinergic cognitive burden score comparable to other patient populations. We found associations at both low and elevated levels of anticholinergic burden with dementia and risk of falls. At elevated anticholinergic burden levels, we found associations with severe disability. Despite recommendations against the use of anticholinergics in older adults these medications are still commonly prescribed. Further study is necessary to define the characteristics of anticholinergic medication most closely associated with negative outcomes in elderly populations.

Update on the management of overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a common condition characterised by urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, frequency and nocturia, in the absence of any other pathology. Clinical diagnosis is based upon patient self-reported symptomology. Currently there is a plethora of treatments available for the management of OAB. Clinical guidelines suggest treatment via a multidisciplinary pathway including behavioural therapy and pharmacotherapy, which can be commenced in primary care, with referral to specialist services in those patients refractory to these treatments. Intradetrusor botulinum A and sacral neuromodulation provide safe and efficacious management of refractory OAB. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and augmentation cystoplasty remain available and efficacious in a select group of patients. Unfortunately, there remains a high rate of patient dissatisfaction and discontinuation in all treatments and thus there remains a need for emerging therapies in the management of OAB.

Use of Drugs with Anticholinergic Properties at Hospital Admission Associated with Mortality in Older Patients: A Danish Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Use of drugs with anticholinergic properties (DAP) has a negative impact on older people.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to examine the association between DAP at hospital admission and mortality in older patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study including patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted to Danish geriatric medicine departments during 2005-2014. National health registers were used to link with individual-level data. Patients were followed to emigration, death, or study termination (31 December 2015). DAP was defined as medications included in the anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scale, which assigns each DAP a score between 1 and 3. The individual ACB score was calculated and the number of DAP counted. We used Cox proportional-hazard regressions to estimate the crude and adjusted hazard ratios adjusting for age, activities of daily living, marital status, index admission period, BMI, and prior hospitalizations (model 1), and additionally Charlson Comorbidity Index (model 2).

RESULTS

We included 74,589 patients aged (median [IQR]) 83 (77-88) years. Use of one or more DAP (62.5%) was associated with increased mortality compared with those with no use (p < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model 2, compared with no use, higher mortality risks (HR [95% CI]) were seen with ACB score of 2 and number of DAP ≥ 5 for 30-day (1.46 [1.32-1.61] and 1.46 [1.09-1.95]), 1-year (1.34 [1.28-1.41] and 1.48 [1.29-1.70]), and overall mortality (1.27 [1.23-1.31] and 1.44 [1.31-1.59]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of DAP at hospital admission is associated with short- and long-term mortality in geriatric patients. Deprescribing studies are warranted to study whether the impact on mortality can be attenuated.

Anticholinergic Burden and Associated Healthcare Resource Utilization in Older Adults with Overactive Bladder

BACKGROUND

Bladder anticholinergics are the most widely used drugs to treat overactive bladder (OAB) but can contribute to cumulative anticholinergic burden, which may be associated with adverse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between cumulative anticholinergic burden and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs in older adults with OAB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study that used data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database. Participants were aged ≥ 65 years with ≥ 3 years of continuous enrolment before and ≥ 2 years after the index date (date of OAB diagnosis or first prescription for any OAB drug between 1 April 2007 and 31 December 2015). The primary endpoint was the association between cumulative anticholinergic burden (assessed using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden [ACB] scale during the 3-year pre-index period) and HRU (GP consultations, specialist referrals, urological tests, hospital admissions) over the 2-year post-index period.

RESULTS

Data from 23,561 adults were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) ACB scores in the pre- and post-index periods were 1.0 (1.1) and 2.4 (1.7), respectively; urological drugs contributed most (58.8%) to the latter. For the primary endpoint, higher pre-index ACB scores were associated with higher post-index HRU and costs. Mean (SD) ACB scores in the post-index period were 1.2 (1.3) and 2.5 (1.7) in those treated with mirabegron (beta-3 agonist) or bladder anticholinergics, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

The generalizability of the results outside the UK is unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adults with OAB, higher anticholinergic burden before initiating OAB drugs is associated with higher HRU and costs. When making treatment decisions in older adults, consideration should be given to assessing the existing anticholinergic burden and using OAB treatments that do not add to this burden.

The cross-sectional association of frailty with past and current exposure to strong anticholinergic drugs

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic drugs may contribute to frailty by impairing cognitive and physical functions. Strong anticholinergic drugs in particular may have adverse effects among older adults.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the association between frailty and the use of strong anticholinergic drugs among older US Veterans.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling Veterans 65 years and older who had determinations of frailty status. Prescription data for patients using strong anticholinergic medications (never/past/current) was obtained via electronic health records. A 31-item VA Frailty Index (VA-FI) was generated at the time of the assessment. We dichotomized the groups into non-frail (FI =  < 0.21) and frail (FI ≥ 0.21) patients. We used binomial logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Frailty was the dependent variable and use of strong anticholinergic drugs was the independent variable. Multivariate adjustment was conducted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, and BMI.

RESULTS

Population sample consisted of 17,084 Veterans who were 71.05% Caucasian, 97.34% male, and with a mean age 75.60 (SD = 8.04) years. Among the population, 9940 (58.18%) patients had no previous use of strong anticholinergic drugs, whereas 5182 (30.33%) had past exposure and 1962 (11.49%) had current exposure. In binomial logistic regression, individuals with past (OR 3.27, 95% CI 3.03-3.54, p < 0.0005) or current (OR 4.78, 95% CI 4.30-5.31, p < 0.0005) exposure showed a higher association with frailty as compared to individuals who were never exposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Past and current use of strong anticholinergic drugs were associated with frailty in older Veterans. These results suggest that screening for frailty in patients with past or current exposure to strong anticholinergic medications may be necessary for proper management.

Association between anticholinergic burden and oropharyngeal dysphagia among hospitalized older adults

BACKGROUND

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is an emerging age-related disorder that affects 23% of inpatients leading to malnutrition, dehydration, or aspiration pneumonia. Anticholinergic drugs can cause reduced peristalsis and dry mouth, both related to dysphagia.

AIM

To determine the association between anticholinergic burden and oropharyngeal dysphagia in older inpatients.

METHODS

Retrospective descriptive observational study. There are 239 patients. Dysphagia diagnosis based on routine volume-viscosity swallow test. Characteristics: age, functional loss (instrumental and basic activities), frailty (Frail-VIG-Index), geriatric syndromes, polypharmacy, and anticholinergic-cognitive-burden scale at admission.

RESULTS

25.5% of elderly patients diagnosed with dysphagia are more dependent and frailer than non-dysphagic patients. 83.6% scored ≥ 3 points on the ACB Scale [odds ratio: 4.46 (2.13-9.33)], which is statistically associated with dysphagia (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with an ACB of ≥ 3 points at admission are more than four times as likely to develop oropharyngeal dysphagia. Evaluating anticholinergic burden routinely should be considered and, whenever possible, reduce it.

Association between Anticholinergic Burden and Constipation: A Systematic Review

The association between anticholinergic burden and constipation is not well defined and documented; for this reason, a systematic review was carried out in five databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Scopus), including studies assessing the correlation between anticholinergic burden, and constipation between January 2006 and December 2020. Data extraction was conducted independently by two researchers. Abstracts and titles were reviewed to determine eligibility for review with eligible articles read in full. From 2507 identified articles, 11 were selected for this review: six cross-sectional studies, four retrospective cohort studies, and a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Overall, nine studies reported at least one statistical association between anticholinergic burden and constipation, finding 13 positive results out of 24 association measurements. A total of 211,921 patients were studied. The association between constipation and anticholinergic burden could be demonstrated in studies including 207,795 patients. Most studies were not designed to find differences in constipation prevalence and did not adjust the results by confounding factors. Our findings suggest that a correlation between anticholinergic burden and constipation exists. Higher quality-evidence studies are needed, including analysis that considers confounding factors, such as other non-pharmacological causes of constipation.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Cumulative Anticholinergic Burden Among Older Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents with Overactive Bladder

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB), the primary cause of urinary incontinence in nursing homes, is commonly treated with anticholinergic medications; however, the elderly population is vulnerable to the adverse effects associated with anticholinergic burden. Given the relatively high prevalence of OAB among nursing home residents, it is important to understand the magnitude of anticholinergic burden in this population.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to (1) examine the prevalence of cumulative anticholinergic burden among long-stay nursing home (LSNH) residents with OAB; and (2) identify the factors associated with varying levels of cumulative anticholinergic burden.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cohort study using Minimum Data Set-linked Medicare claims data. Anticholinergic burden was determined based on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale and patient-specific dosing using defined daily dose. The Andersen Behavioral Model framework was used to identify the predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with levels of anticholinergic burden. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to determine the factors associated with levels of anticholinergic burden.

RESULTS

A total of 123,308 LSNH residents with OAB were identified; 87.2% had some degree of anticholinergic burden and 27.3% had high cumulative burden. Multiple factors were associated with higher levels of burden, including younger age, female sex, and non-Hispanic White ethnicity (predisposing factors); dual eligibility, Southern geographic region, and rural residence (enabling factors); and a number of comorbidities and concomitant medications (need factors).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a high level of anticholinergic burden among LSNH residents. Multiple factors were associated with a high level of burden. There is a need to optimize the use of anticholinergics due to their significant safety concerns in the LSNH setting.

Effects of anticholinergic medication use on brain integrity in persons living with HIV and persons without HIV

OBJECTIVE

This study examined relationships between anticholinergic medication burden and brain integrity in people living with HIV (PLWH) and people without HIV (HIV-).

METHODS

Neuropsychological performance z-scores (learning, retention, executive function, motor/psychomotor speed, language domains, and global cognition), and neuroimaging measures (brain volumetrics and white matter fractional anisotropy) were analyzed in PLWH (n = 209) and HIV- (n = 95) grouped according to the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale (0 = no burden, 1-3 = low burden, >3 = high burden). Neuropsychological performance and neuroimaging outcomes were compared between HIV- and PLWH with high anticholinergic burden. Within a cohort of PLWH (n = 90), longitudinal change in ACB score over ∼2 years was correlated to the rate of change per month of study interval in neuropsychological performance and neuroimaging measures.

RESULTS

A higher number of anticholinergic medications and ACB was observed in PLWH compared with HIV- (P < 0.05). A higher ACB was associated with worse motor/psychomotor performance, smaller occipital lobe, putamen, subcortical gray matter and total gray matter volumes in HIV-; and poorer executive function, retention and global cognition, smaller brain volumes (frontal, parietal and temporal lobes, hippocampus, amygdala, cortex, subcortical gray matter and total gray matter), and reduced fractional anisotropy (posterior corpus callosum, perforant pathway) in PLWH. PLWH with high anticholinergic burden performed worse on tests of learning and executive function compared with HIV- with high anticholinergic burden. Longitudinally, PLWH who reduced their ACB over time had better neuropsychological performance and neuroimaging measures.

CONCLUSION

Anticholinergic medications were associated with worse neuropsychological performance and reduced structural brain integrity, and these effects were more widespread in PLWH. Use of anticholinergic medications should be carefully monitored in older adults with deprescription considered whenever possible.

Ambulatory Heart Rate Variability in Schizophrenia or Depression: Impact of Anticholinergic Burden and Other Factors

BACKGROUND

Heart rate variability (HRV) has been found reduced in patients with schizophrenia and depression. However, there is a lack of knowledge on how demographic, lifestyle, and pharmacological factors contribute to the reduction in HRV in these patients.

METHODS

We recruited 37 patients with schizophrenia, 43 patients with unipolar depression, and 64 healthy controls. A combined chest-worn HRV and accelerometer device was used in an ambulatory measurement. Age, sex, anticholinergic burden of medication, nicotine use, body mass index, and ongoing physical activity were assessed in multiple regression models regarding their influence on HRV, measured as the standard deviation of all the RR intervals (SDNN).

RESULTS

In the fully adjusted model, schizophrenia (β = -0.23, P = 0.019), depression (β = -0.18, P = 0.028), age (β = -0.34, P < 0.000), ongoing physical activity (β = -0.23, P = 0.001), and anticholinergic burden (β = -0.19, P = 0.025) influenced SDNN negatively. Sex, nicotine use, and BMI had negligible effects on SDNN.

CONCLUSIONS

We show for the first time that a quantified score of anticholinergic burden of medication has a negative relationship to HRV in patients with schizophrenia or depression, but that the diagnoses themselves still exhibit an effect on HRV.

Association between anticholinergic burden and anticholinergic adverse outcomes in the elderly: Pharmacological basis of their predictive value for adverse outcomes

The use of anticholinergic drugs and other drugs with anticholinergic activity is highly prevalent in older people. Cumulative anticholinergic effects, known as anticholinergic burden, are associated with important peripheral and central adverse effects and outcomes. Several methods have been developed to quantify anticholinergic burden and to estimate the risk of adverse anticholinergic effects. Serum anticholinergic activity (SAA) and anticholinergic burden scoring systems are the most commonly used methods to predict the occurrence of important negative outcomes. These tools could guide clinicians in making more rational prescriptions to enhance patient safety, especially in older people. However, the literature has reported conflicting results about the predictive ability of these tools. The majority of these instruments ignore relevant pharmacologic aspects such as the doses used, differential muscarinic receptor subtype affinities, and blood-brain barrier permeability. To increase the clinical relevance of these tools, mechanistic and clinical pharmacology should collaborate. This narrative review describes the rational and pharmacological basis of anticholinergic burden tools and provides insight about their predictive value for adverse outcomes.

Anticholinergic medications and risk of dementia in older adults: Where are we now?

INTRODUCTION

Anticholinergic medications are effective for a wide variety of indications, but are associated with significant central adverse effects, especially cognitive decline and dementia in older adults.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a review of relevant literature in the past decade to address anticholinergic scales and evidence of anticholinergic-related dementia/cognitive decline in older adults. We discussed various anticholinergic scales used to classify anticholinergic medications. The review focused on the evidence from previous reviews and individual studies evaluating the anticholinergic-related risk of developing cognitive decline/dementia. This review also discussed clinical and methodological issues of studies along with recommendations for practice and research.

EXPERT OPINION

The review demonstrates moderate to strong risk of dementia with anticholinergic use in multiple studies involving older adults, irrespective of the study design, analytical approach, anticholinergic exposure and outcome definition. This risk is particularly significant with the cumulative burden and high-level anticholinergics. There also exists a dose-response relationship between anticholinergic use and increased risk for dementia. Therefore, anticholinergic agents can be considered as a modifiable risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline in older adults. Based on the current evidence, regular assessment and optimization of anticholinergic burden prior to prescribing these medications can minimize anticholinergic-related morbidity in older adults.

Anticholinergics May Carry Significant Cognitive and Gait Burden in Parkinson's Disease

Background

Anticholinergic drugs are associated with significant cognitive and other adverse events in older adults, including those with Parkinson's disease (PD). Anticholinergic effects are considered lesser in younger individuals and the burden and outcomes in younger patients with PD are unknown.

Objectives

To determine the cumulative anticholinergic burden in a cohort of younger of patients with PD and to correlate the same with cognitive impairment and freezing of gait (FOG).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study to identify the cumulative anticholinergic burden from medications prescribed to patients with PD. Two standard scales, the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale and the ACB score, were used to calculate the anticholinergic burden from prescriptions. We identified commonly prescribed drugs contributing to anticholinergic effects and correlated the cumulative ACB score with cognitive impairment (Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale item 1.1) and FOG (Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale items 2.13 and 3.11).

Results

We recruited 287 patients with PD (68.9% male) with a mean age of 56.9 ± 11.8 years and a duration of symptoms 6.3 ± 6.9 years. Median ACB score was 4 (range 0-12). A total of 164 (58.4%) patients had total ACB score > 3. ACB score > 3 was independently associated with cognitive impairment (Odds Ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-4.53; P < 0.001) and FOG using patient-reported measures (Odds Ratio, 3.192; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.68-6.07; P < 0.001) and objective measures (odds ratio, 2.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.6, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

Patients with PD are exposed to significant anticholinergic burden from drugs prescribed for PD and non-PD indications. Higher anticholinergic burden is associated with cognitive impairment and FOG even in younger patients with PD.

The cognitive safety of antimuscarinics in the treatment of overactive bladder

INTRODUCTION

Overactive bladder is a common problem women suffer from, with its incidence increasing with age. The mainstay of treatment is antimuscarinic medication. There is growing evidence that antimuscarinics may increase the risk of cognitive impairment, dementia, and even death.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores the evidence that antimuscarinics increase the risk of cognitive impairment, dementia, and death. It evaluates how best to treat overactive bladder the older woman.

EXPERT OPINION

The evidence suggests that antimuscarinics increase the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in the older adult. Care should be taken to use an antimuscarinic that is less likely to cross the blood-brain barrier and thus reduce the risk of these significant adverse events. A patient's anticholinergic load also needs to be considered when treating this group. Other treatment options such as fluid management, bladder retraining, vaginal estrogens, mirabegron, Onabotulinum toxin A and neuromodulation can be used instead.