1
|
Bourneuf AL, Pabic EL, de Visme S, Levieux K, Pladys P. Risk factors for unexpected infant death among very premature infants in France. Arch Pediatr 2024; 31:195-201. [PMID: 38538469 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prematurity is one of the risk factors for sudden unexpected infant death (SUID), a phenomenon that remains poorly explained. MATERIALS AND METHODS The analysis of specific factors associated with SUID among very premature infants (VPI) was performed through a retrospective review of data collected in the French SUID registry from May 2015 to December 2018. The factors associated with SUID among VPI were compared with those observed among full-term infants (FTI). Results are expressed as means (standard deviation [SD]) or medians (interquartile range [IQR)]. RESULTS During the study period, 719 cases of SUID were included in the registry, 36 (incidence: 0.60 ‰) of which involved VPI (gestational age: 29.2 [2] weeks, 1157 [364]) g] and 313 (0.18 ‰) involved FTI (gestational age: 40 [0.8] weeks, 3298 [452] g). The infants' postnatal age at the time of death was similar in the two groups: 15.5 (12.2-21.8) vs. 14.5 (7.1-23.4) weeks. We observed low breastfeeding rates and a high proportion of fathers with no occupation or unemployment status among the VPI compared to the FTI group (31% vs. 55 %, p = 0.01 and 32% vs. 13 %, p = 0.05, respectively). Among the VPI, only 52 % were in supine position, and 29 % were lying prone at the time of the SUID (compared to 63 % and 17 %, respectively, in the FTI group). CONCLUSION This study confirms prematurity as a risk factor for SUID with no difference in the SUID-specific risk factors studied except for breastfeeding and socioeconomic status of the fathers. VPI and FTI died at similar chronological ages with a high proportion of infants dying in prone position. These results argue for reinforcement of prevention strategies in cases of prematurity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Estelle Le Pabic
- CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414 (Clinical Investigation Center), F-35000 Rennes, France
| | | | - Karine Levieux
- Inserm CIC 1413, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France; Pediatric Emergency Care Unit, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Patrick Pladys
- Department of Child and Adolescent Medicine, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France; Research and Innovation Department, Paediatric Department, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carpay NC, Kakaroukas A, D Embleton N, van Elburg RM. Barriers and Facilitators to Breastfeeding in Moderate and Late Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review. Breastfeed Med 2021; 16:370-384. [PMID: 33733865 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Rationale: Most of the preterm infants are born between 32 and 36 weeks of gestation (moderate to late preterm infants [MLPIs]). This comes with significant short- and long-term risks. Breastfeeding reduces many of these risks, but breastfeeding rates in MLPIs are lower than those in full-term infants. We performed a systematic review of studies identifying factors associated with successful breastfeeding in MLPIs and interventions to improve breastfeeding. Methods: Systematic search performed using PubMed April 24, 2020. In total, 11 articles describing barriers to breastfeeding in MLPIs and 6 articles about interventions to improve breastfeeding were included. Interventions were categorized according to different outcomes: breastfeeding initiation, continuation for 5 days to 6 weeks, and continuation ≥3 months. Because of heterogeneity in study characteristics, no meta-analysis was performed. Results: Breastfeeding rates were lower in those with lower socioeconomic status and single-parent households. Providing parents with more information and direct health care support significantly improved breastfeeding initiation. Cup feeding instead of bottle feeding had inconsistent effects on breastfeeding initiation and continuation. Continuous skin-to-skin contact did not affect breastfeeding initiation or continuation. Discussion: Risk groups for lower breastfeeding rates of MLPIs include mothers with lower socioeconomic status and single mothers. Interventions that may improve breastfeeding include cup feeding and providing parents with more information and health care support. Key limitations of included studies are lack of adequate adjustment for confounders and lack of blinding. However, this is the first systematic review identifying both risk groups and interventions to improve breastfeeding in MLPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora C Carpay
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Kakaroukas
- Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas D Embleton
- Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Ruurd M van Elburg
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mitha A, Piedvache A, Khoshnood B, Fresson J, Glorieux I, Roué JM, Blondel B, Durox M, Burguet A, Ancel PY, Kaminski M, Pierrat V. The impact of neonatal unit policies on breast milk feeding at discharge of moderate preterm infants: The EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION 2019; 15:e12875. [PMID: 31310706 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Facilitating factors and barriers to breast milk feeding (BMF) for preterm infants have been mainly studied in very preterm populations, but little is known about moderate preterm infants. We aimed to analyze hospital unit characteristics and BMF policies associated with BMF at discharge for infants born at 32 to 34 weeks' gestation. EPIPAGE-2, a French national cohort of preterm births, included 883 infants born at 32 to 34 weeks' gestation. We investigated kangaroo care in the first 24 hr, early involvement of parents in feeding support, volume of the unit, BMF information given to mothers hospitalized for threatened preterm delivery, protocols for BMF, presence of a professional trained in human lactation, unit training in neurodevelopmental care, and regional BMF initiation rates in the general population. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to investigate associations between unit policies and BMF at discharge, adjusted for individual characteristics and estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, 59% (490/828) of infants received BMF at discharge (27% to 87% between units). Rates of BMF at discharge were higher with kangaroo care (adjusted OR 2.03 [95% CI 1.01, 4.10]), early involvement of parents in feeding support (1.94 [1.23, 3.04]), unit training in a neurodevelopmental care programme (2.57 [1.18, 5.60]), and in regions with a high level of BMF initiation in the general population (1.85 [1.05, 3.28]). Creating synergies by interventions at the unit and population level may reduce the variability in BMF rates at discharge for moderate preterm infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayoub Mitha
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,Department of Neonatal Medicine, CHU Lille, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Aurélie Piedvache
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Babak Khoshnood
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Jeanne Fresson
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CHRU Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Isabelle Glorieux
- Department of Neonatology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Michel Roué
- Department of Neonatal Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Béatrice Blondel
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Mélanie Durox
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Burguet
- Department of Neonatal Pediatrics, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Ancel
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,Clinical Research Unit, Center for Clinical Investigation P1419, Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Monique Kaminski
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Pierrat
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,Department of Neonatal Medicine, CHU Lille, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mitha A, Piedvache A, Glorieux I, Zeitlin J, Roué JM, Blondel B, Durox M, Burguet A, Kaminski M, Ancel PY, Pierrat V. Unit policies and breast milk feeding at discharge of very preterm infants: The EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2019; 33:59-69. [PMID: 30698887 DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Facilitating factors and barriers to breast milk feeding (BMF) very preterm (VP) infants have been widely studied at the individual level. We aimed to describe and analyse factors associated with BMF at discharge for VP infants, with a special focus on unit policies aiming to support BMF. METHODS We described BMF at discharge in 3108 VP infants enrolled in EPIPAGE-2, a French national cohort. Variables of interest were kangaroo care during the 1st week of life (KC); unit's policies supporting BMF initiation (BMF information systematically given to mothers hospitalised for threatened preterm delivery and breast milk expression proposed within 6 hours after birth) and BMF maintenance (availability of protocols for BMF and a special room for mothers to pump milk); the presence in units of a professional trained in human lactation and regional BMF initiation rates in the general population. Associations were investigated by multilevel logistic regression analysis, with adjustment on individual factors. RESULTS In total, 47.2% of VP infants received BMF at discharge (range among units 21.1%-84.0%). Unit policies partly explained this variation, regardless of individual factors. BMF at discharge was associated with KC (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40, 3.65)), with policies supporting BMF initiation (aOR 2.19 (95% CI 1.27, 3.77)) and maintenance (aOR 2.03 (95% CI 1.17, 3.55)), but not with BMF initiation rates in the general population. CONCLUSION Adopting policies of higher performing units could be an effective strategy for increasing BMF rates at discharge among VP infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayoub Mitha
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Paris, France.,Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,CHU Lille, Department of Neonatal Medicine, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Aurélie Piedvache
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Glorieux
- Department of Neonatology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Jennifer Zeitlin
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Michel Roué
- Department of Neonatal Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Béatrice Blondel
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Mélanie Durox
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Burguet
- Department of Neonatal Pediatrics, Dijon University Hospital Dijon, France
| | - Monique Kaminski
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Ancel
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Paris, France.,Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,Clinical Research Unit, Center for Clinical Investigation P1419, Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Pierrat
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Paris, France.,CHU Lille, Department of Neonatal Medicine, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|