Clinical outcomes following pre-, pro- and synbiotic supplementation after caesarean birth or antibiotic exposure in the first week of life in term born infants: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Caesarean section and early exposure to antibiotics disrupt the developing gastrointestinal microbiome, which is associated with long-term health effects.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the impact of prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics supplementation on clinical health outcomes of term infants born by caesarean section or exposed to antibiotics in the first week of life.

DESIGN

A systematic search was performed in Medline and Embase from inception to August 2021. Title and abstract screening (n = 11,248), full text screening (n = 48), and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers.

RESULTS

Six RCTs studying caesarean born infants were included, group sizes varied between 32-193 with in total 752 children. No studies regarding supplementation after neonatal antibiotic exposure were found. Three studies administered a probiotic, one a prebiotic, one a synbiotic, and one study investigated a prebiotic and synbiotic. Several significant effects were reported at follow-up varying between 10 days and 13 years: a decrease in atopic diseases (n = 2 studies), higher immune response to tetanus and polio vaccinations (n = 2), lower response to influenza vaccination (n = 1), fewer infectious diseases (n = 2), and less infantile colic (n = 1), although results were inconsistent.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementation of caesarean-born infants with prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics resulted in significant improvements in some health outcomes as well as vaccination responses. Due to the variety of studied products and the paucity of studies, no recommendations can be given yet on the routine application of prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics to improve health outcomes after caesarean section or neonatal antibiotic exposure.

Barriers and Facilitators to Breastfeeding in Moderate and Late Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

Rationale: Most of the preterm infants are born between 32 and 36 weeks of gestation (moderate to late preterm infants [MLPIs]). This comes with significant short- and long-term risks. Breastfeeding reduces many of these risks, but breastfeeding rates in MLPIs are lower than those in full-term infants. We performed a systematic review of studies identifying factors associated with successful breastfeeding in MLPIs and interventions to improve breastfeeding. Methods: Systematic search performed using PubMed April 24, 2020. In total, 11 articles describing barriers to breastfeeding in MLPIs and 6 articles about interventions to improve breastfeeding were included. Interventions were categorized according to different outcomes: breastfeeding initiation, continuation for 5 days to 6 weeks, and continuation ≥3 months. Because of heterogeneity in study characteristics, no meta-analysis was performed. Results: Breastfeeding rates were lower in those with lower socioeconomic status and single-parent households. Providing parents with more information and direct health care support significantly improved breastfeeding initiation. Cup feeding instead of bottle feeding had inconsistent effects on breastfeeding initiation and continuation. Continuous skin-to-skin contact did not affect breastfeeding initiation or continuation. Discussion: Risk groups for lower breastfeeding rates of MLPIs include mothers with lower socioeconomic status and single mothers. Interventions that may improve breastfeeding include cup feeding and providing parents with more information and health care support. Key limitations of included studies are lack of adequate adjustment for confounders and lack of blinding. However, this is the first systematic review identifying both risk groups and interventions to improve breastfeeding in MLPIs.