Barriers and Facilitators to Rehabilitation Care of Individuals With Spatial Neglect: A Qualitative Study of Professional Views

Diagnosis of spatial neglect and rehabilitation access for stroke survivors

Spatial neglect in stroke survivors is associated with a decrease in quality of life. This disorder occurs in 20-80% of stroke survivors and up to 1/3 of stroke survivors will continue to experience chronic impairment. Occupational therapists are uniquely qualified to treat stroke survivors with spatial neglect due to their holistic approach but access to therapy is limited. Diagnostic coding is used to help determine appropriate reimbursement and continuation of care including rehabilitation services. The objectives of this study were to 1) identify the prevalence of diagnostic coding for spatial neglect in stroke survivors, and 2) identify the prevalence and types of rehabilitation for patients with diagnostic coding for spatial neglect. We completed a retrospective cohort analysis using 2018 and 2019 5% Medicare Limited Data Sets from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We extracted all ischemic stroke survivors and stratified them by the presence of a secondary diagnostic code indicating spatial neglect. Rehabilitation Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify stroke survivors who received rehabilitation. Despite recommendations from clinical practice, only 4.9% had a diagnostic code for spatial neglect. Of those formally diagnosed, only 2.3% received outpatient occupational therapy after being discharged from acute care.

Identifying Spatial Neglect in Chronic Right Hemisphere Stroke Survivors Using the RHDBank Outcomes

PURPOSE

The chronicity of spatial neglect (SN) and the utility of existing diagnostic measures used by speech-language pathologists remain poorly understood. In this retrospective study, we examined how the RHDBank test battery informs the identification of SN after right hemisphere brain damage (RHD) during the chronic phase of recovery.

METHOD

Data from 29 right hemisphere stroke survivors were extracted from the RHDBank, including SN tests, for which we performed laterality index scoring: a 51-item demographic survey, the Apples Test, the Indented Paragraph Test, and the clock drawing task from the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT). Two groups (SN+ and SN-) were identified using the Apples Test. A hierarchical cluster analysis explored CLQT performance clusters in association with SN, and group comparisons of demographic variables and test scores were conducted.

RESULTS

Ten patients were identified as having SN+ (34%) using the Apples Test. The Indented Paragraph Test and the CLQT's clock drawing test identified only two of the 20 stroke survivors with SN+. Cluster analyses showed that domain and task scores on the CLQT carried information to classify participants into SN+ and SN- in concordance with performance on the Apples Test. Participants in the SN+ cluster had moderately impaired attention and executive function skills and mildly impaired visuospatial skills.

CONCLUSIONS

The Apples Test differentiated SN in a group of chronic right hemisphere stroke survivors. Using multiple measures from the CLQT seemed to capture a greater range of problems than clock drawing and paragraph reading tests alone. Therefore, the RHDBank test battery as a whole-and in part the CLQT, Apples Test, and Indented Paragraph Test-can detect certain subtypes of SN in the chronic deficit profile after RHD and is a starting point for diagnostic integration by speech-language pathologists.

The Neurophysiological Features Associated with Unilateral Spatial Neglect Recovery: A Scoping Review

The purpose of this scoping review is to provide updated information on the neural basis and neurophysiological features associated with unilateral spatial neglect (USN) recovery. We applied the Preferred Reporting Systems for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework and identified 16 relevant papers from the databases. Critical appraisal was performed by two independent reviewers using a standardized appraisal instrument developed by the PRISMA-ScR. We identified and categorized investigation methods for the neural basis and neurophysiological features of USN recovery after stroke using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI, and electroencephalography (EEG). This review found two brain-level mechanisms underlying USN recovery at the behavioral level. These include the absence of stroke-related damage to the right ventral attention network during the acute phase and compensatory recruitment of analogous areas of the undamaged opposite hemisphere and prefrontal cortex during visual search tasks in the subacute or later phases. However, the relationship between the neural and neurophysiological findings and improvements in USN-related activities of daily living remains unknown. This review adds to the growing body of evidence regarding the neural mechanisms underlying USN recovery.

Quantification and Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Validation Study in Healthy Subjects

Unilateral spatial neglect is a common sensorimotor disorder following the occurrence of a stroke, for which prismatic adaptation is a promising rehabilitation method. However, the use of prisms for rehabilitation often requires the use of specific equipment that may not be available in clinics. To address this limitation, we developed a new software package that allows for the quantification and rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect using immersive virtual reality. In this study, we compared the effects of virtual and real prisms in healthy subjects and evaluated the performance of our virtual reality tool (HTC Vive) against a validated motion capture tool. Ten healthy subjects were randomly exposed to virtual and real prisms, and measurements were taken before and after exposure. Our findings indicate that virtual prisms are at least as effective as real prisms in inducing aftereffects (4.39° ± 2.91° with the virtual prisms compared to 4.30° ± 3.49° with the real prisms), but that these effects were not sustained beyond 2 h regardless of exposure modality. The virtual measurements obtained with our software showed excellent metrological qualities (ICC = 0.95, error = 0.52° ± 1.18°), demonstrating its validity and reliability for quantifying deviation during pointing movements. Overall, our results suggest that our virtual reality software (Virtualis, Montpellier, France) could provide an easy and reliable means of quantifying and rehabilitating spatial neglect. Further validation of these results is required in individuals with unilateral spatial neglect.