In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions

Accurate surgical posterior tibial slope alteration can be achieved in total knee arthroplasty regardless of surgeon skill level or local soft tissue thickness-A retrospective radiograph-based study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively report on the impact of local soft tissue thickness and surgeon skill level on the accuracy of surgical posterior tibial slope (PTS) alteration achieved in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilising lateral knee radiographs.

METHODS

Pre- and postoperative radiographs of 82 patients undergoing primary TKA using conventional mechanical alignment technique were measured by two observers and subjected to quality criteria for accurate measurement of the PTS. All patients underwent a standardised surgical approach for PTS alteration: cruciate-retaining (CR) cases with preoperative PTS ≤ 10° were set for reconstruction of the preoperative PTS. Cases indicated for posterior-stabilised (PS) design and/or with a preoperative PTS > 10° were set for 3° of postoperative PTS. Pretibial subcutaneous fat (PSF) and surgeon skill level were analysed for their predictive quality regarding the accuracy of surgical PTS alteration achieved.

RESULTS

The overall mean postoperative PTS was significantly lower than the preoperative values (6.2°, SD 2.7 vs. 7.7°, SD 3.2; p = 0.002103). Neither local soft tissue thickness, namely PSF, nor surgeon skill level was found to be a predictor of the accuracy of surgical PTS alteration achieved. Among cases set for PTS reconstruction, 25.9% and 42.6% achieved a postoperative PTS within ±1° and ±2° of preoperative values, respectively. In patients with a PTS > 10° or those indicated for PS design, slope reduction was achieved with a mean postoperative PTS of 6.5°. Furthermore, 14.3% and 32.1% of cases were within ±1° and ±2° of 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that accurate surgical alteration of the PTS is possible in TKA regardless of local knee soft tissue thickness or surgeon skill level. This proves the clinical feasibility of both targeted reduction as well as reconstruction of the PTS in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Significantly better precision with new machine learning versus manual image registration software in processing images from single-plane fluoroscopy to determine tibiofemoral kinematics following total knee replacement

One common method to determine tibiofemoral kinematics following total knee replacement (TKR) is to capture single-plane fluoroscopic images of a patient activity and determine anterior-posterior (AP) positions of the femoral condyles and internal-external (IE) tibial rotation. Although JointTrack is widely used to analyze such images, precision (i.e. repeatability) in determining AP positions and IE tibial rotations using the two publicly available programs has never been quantified. The objectives were to determine the precision and reproducibility of results using both programs. Fluoroscopic images of 16 patients who performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend following TKR were analyzed. JointTrack Manual (JTM) and JointTrack Machine Learning (JTML) were used to perform 3D model-to-2D image registration after which AP positions of the femoral condyles and IE tibial rotations were determined. Precision in AP positions and IE rotations was quantified. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for both repeatability (i.e. intraobserver) and reproducibility (i.e. interobserver) also were determined. Precision using JTM was worse than JTML for AP positions of the medial and lateral femoral condyles (1.0 mm and 0.9 mm vs 0.3 mm and 0.4 mm, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). For IE tibial rotation, precision also was worse using JTM versus JTML (1.1º vs 0.9°, p = 0.010). ICC values for JTML indicated good to excellent agreement (range: 0.82-0.98) whereas ICC values for JTM indicated only moderate to good agreement (range: 0.58-0.88). JTML has better precision and reproducibility than JTM and also is more efficient to use. Therefore, use of JTML over JTM is strongly recommended.

PCL retained is safe in medial pivot TKA-a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

Medial pivot (MP) designs resemble native knee kinematics and restore the "natural" kinematics of a knee after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, whether to preserve or resect the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is still under debate. We inquired whether sacrificing the PCL would improve range of motion, functional outcomes, and limb alignment compared to preserving the PCL in TKA using medial pivot implants (MP-TKA).

METHODS

This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial consisted of 33 patients (66 knees) undergoing bilateral simultaneous MP-TKA. In one knee, a PCL preservation technique was performed, and in the contralateral knee, the PCL was resected. The primary outcome was postoperative range of motion (ROM). The secondary outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) score for knee pain at walking, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for symptoms (KOOS-S) and quality of life (KOOS-QoL), Oxford knee score (OKS), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and measurement of the mechanical femoral-tibial axis (mFTA) on X-ray images. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent MP-TKA with PCL preservation had a similar ROM at 2 years (125.45 ± 7.00 vs. 126.21 ± 6.73, p = 0.65) as those who underwent MP-TKAs with PCL resection. There was also no difference in VAS score (1.94 ± 0.79 vs. 2.00 ± 0.71, respectively, p = 0.51), OKS (39.97 ± 2.01 vs. 39.67 ± 2.03, respectively, p = 0.52), KOOS-S (84.41 ± 3.77 vs. 84.19 ± 3.57, respectively, p = 0.92), KOOS-QoL (82.94 ± 4.76 vs. 82.75 ± 4.70, respectively, p = 0.84), or FJS (72.66 ± 8.99 vs. 72.35 ± 8.64, respectively, p = 0.76) at the 2-year follow-up. No difference in the measurement of the mFTA was found between the two groups (180.27 ± 2.25 vs. 181.30 ± 2.13, respectively, p = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that both medial pivot TKA with PCL preservation and PCL resection achieved excellent results. There was no difference at the 2-year follow-up in terms of postoperative ROM, patient-reported outcomes, or radiographic evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level I.

Comparison of clinical outcomes among total knee arthroplasties using posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, bi-cruciate substituting, bi-cruciate retaining designs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the advent of innovative knee prosthesis design, a consistent first-option knee implant design in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remained unsettled. This study aimed to compare the clinical effects among posterior-stabilized (PS), cruciate-retaining (CR), bi-cruciate substituting (BCS), and bi-cruciate retaining designs for primary TKA.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies from inception up to July 30, 2021. The primary outcomes were the range of knee motion (ROM), and the secondary outcomes were the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication and revision rates. Confidence in evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed for synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 15 RCTs and 18 cohort studies involving 3520 knees were included. The heterogeneity and inconsistency were acceptable. There was a significant difference in ROM at the early follow-up when PS was compared with CR (mean difference [MD] = 3.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 7.18) and BCS was compared with CR (MD = 9.69, 95% CI 2.18, 17.51). But at the long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in ROM in any one knee implant compared with the others. No significant increase was found in the PROMs and complication and revision rates at the final follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

At early follow-up after TKA, PS and BCS knee implants significantly outperform the CR knee implant in ROM. But in the long run, the available evidence suggests different knee prostheses could make no difference in clinical outcomes after TKA with extended follow-up.

Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review

Posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee is a popular implant choice. At present, there is no consensus on whether sacrifice or retention of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) offers superior outcomes. This review explores the current literature available on CR total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PubMed was searched by keyword to find relevant articles for inclusion. Additional sources came from article references and joint registry reports. CR design knees have distinct kinematic gait patterns from posterior-stabilizing (PS) knees and exhibit paradoxical anterior femoral movement with less femoral rollback. While CR implants offer less flexion than PS designs, the difference is not clinically detectable as clinical scores are similar in the short and long term. CR implants have better long-term survival compared to PS knees, likely due to lower risk of aseptic loosening. CR total knee arthroplasties also have shorter operating times and lower risk of peri-prosthetic fractures. Because the CR implant is unconstrained, there may be an increased risk of instability compared to PS designs, but the literature is mixed. Overall, the current literature supports the continued use of CR TKAs due to their lower risk of complications, durability, and demonstrated equivalence in function to posterior-substituting models.

The effect of posterior tibial slope on anteroposterior stability in posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that the posterior tibial slope (PTS) plays an important role in increasing the anteroposterior stability following total knee arthroplasty. Although the relationship between the PTS and the flexion range has been investigated many times, studies on the relationship between PTS and anterior-posterior stability are limited. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the relationship and effects of PTS on anteroposterior stability in posterior cruciate retainer total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

154 primary TKAs were identified retrospectively to analyze the any association between PTS and anteroposterior laxity following posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in the overall study populations. Anteroposterior displacement was measured at the final follow-up based on the following two procedures: KT-1000 arthrometer and sagittal drawer radiographic images. In addition, the relationship between PTS and functional scores-ROM was examined.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between patients' posterior tibial slope and postoperative VAS (r: -0.060, p:0.544), WOMAC (r:0.037, p:0.709), KSS (r: -0.073, p:0.455). In addition, there was no significant correlation between postoperative knee ROM and postoperative PTS (r:0.159, p:0.106). Moreover, no correlation was found between KT-1000 arthrometer and 20 degrees AP translation with PTS. There was a negative correlation between PTS and 70 degrees AP translation (r: -0.281, p:0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study aimed to clarify the association between instability and AP laxity in flexion of implanted knees, and to determine what degree of AP laxity results of instability. A fundamental finding of this study was that; the optimum TS angle to increase anterior-posterior stability after total knee arthroplasty is between ≥ 4 to < 6 degrees, we also proved that there is no relationship between stability and patient satisfaction.

Mid-Flexion, Anteroposterior Stability of Total Knee Replacement Implanted with Kinematic Alignment: A Randomized, Quantitative Radiographic Laxity Study with Posterior-Stabilized and Medial-Stabilized Implants

UPDATE

This article was updated on January 4, 2023, because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 16, in Figure 5, the x-axis that had read "P<0.0086" now reads "KSS Pain (p=0.02)," and the value for the MS group that had read "48.9" now reads "48.8."This article was updated on January 6, 2022, because of a previous error. On page 13, in the section entitled "Results," the sentence that had read "However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the MS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008)." now reads "However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the PS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008)."

BACKGROUND

Stability in mid-flexion is important for satisfactory clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to compare the anteroposterior stability of knees that had been treated with a posterior-stabilized (PS) device or a medial-stabilized (MS) device. We hypothesized that mid-flexion laxity would be greater in the PS group and that clinical outcome scores would be better for the group with lower laxity.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who had been randomly selected from a larger randomized, prospective, blinded clinical trial underwent primary TKA with either a PS implant (n = 30) or an MS implant (n = 33). Range of motion, the Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were collected, and anteroposterior laxity with the knee in 45° and 90° of flexion was evaluated with stress radiographs.

RESULTS

In 45° of flexion, the MS group demonstrated significantly less total anteroposterior displacement than the PS group (mean, 3.6 versus 16.5 mm; p ≤ 0.0001). In 90° of flexion, the total anteroposterior displacement was not significantly different for the 2 groups when both male and female patients were included (mean, 3.9 versus 5.9; p = 0.07). However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the PS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of preoperative age, body mass index, sex distribution, FJS, KSS, or range of motion, and they also did not differ in terms of postoperative FJS or range of motion. However, all 33 patients in the MS group returned to sports as indicated in question 12 of the FJS, compared with 19 subjects in the PS group (p = 0.0001). The postoperative KSS Pain, Pain/Motion, and Function scores were all significantly higher in the MS group than the PS; specifically, the mean KSS Pain score was 48.8 in the MS group, compared with 44.8 in the PS group (p = 0.02); the mean KSS Pain/Motion score was 98.4 in the MS group, compared with 89.5 in the PS group (p < 0.0001); and the mean KSS Function score was 95.5 in the MS group, compared with 85.7 in the PS group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-flexion laxity was greater in patients with PS implants than in those with MS implants, and laxity in 90° was greater in the subset of female patients in the PS group. The decreased laxity observed in the MS group correlated with higher KSS Pain, Pain/Motion, and Function scores as well as with a higher rate of return to sports activities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Kinematic function of knee implant designs across a range of daily activities

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to measure and compare six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) knee joint motion of three total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant designs across a range of daily activities. Seventy-five TKA patients were recruited to this study and randomly assigned a posterior-stabilized (PS), cruciate-retaining (CR), or medial-stabilized (MS) implant. Six months after surgery, patients performed five activities of daily living: level walking, step-up, step-down, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit. Mobile biplane X-ray imaging was used to measure 6-DOF knee kinematics and the center of rotation of the knee in the transverse plane for each activity. Mean 6-DOF knee kinematics were consistently similar for PS and CR, whereas MS was more externally rotated and abducted, and lateral shift was lower across all activities. Peak-to-peak anterior drawer for MS was also significantly lower during walking, step-up, and step-down (p < 0.017). The center of rotation of the knee in the transverse plane was located on the medial side for MS, whereas PS and CR rotated about the lateral compartment or close to the tibial origin. The kinematic function of MS was more similar to that of the healthy knee than PS and CR based on reduced paradoxical anterior translation at low flexion angles and a transverse center of rotation located in the medial compartment. Overall, 6-DOF knee joint motion for PS and CR were similar across all daily activities, whereas that measured for MS was appreciably different. The kinematic patterns observed for MS reflects a highly conforming medial articulation in the MS design.

Posterior-Stabilized Versus Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Risk of Bias Considerations

Background

Numerous systematic reviews have been published comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing posterior stabilized (PS) versus cruciate-retaining (CR) procedures in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but with some overlaps and contradictions. The objectives of this study were (1) to perform an overview of current systematic reviews comparing PS versus CR in TKA, by evaluating their methodological quality and risk of bias, and (2) to provide recommendations through the best evidence.

Methods

A systematic search of systematic reviews comparing PS and CR in TKA, published until June 2021 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Included systematic reviews were assessed for methodological quality and risk of bias by the AMSTAR2 instrument and ROBIS tool, respectively. The choice of best evidence was conducted according to the Jadad decision algorithm.

Results

A total of eight systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion in this study. The Jadad decision algorithm suggested that reviews with the highest AMSTAR2 scores should be selected. According to the ROBIS tool, there were three reviews with a low risk of bias and five with a high risk of bias. Consequently, one systematic review conducted by Verra et al. with the highest AMSTAR2 score and low risk of bias was selected as the best evidence.

Conclusions

Although current systematic reviews demonstrated some statistical differences in clinical presentation and functional outcomes between PS and CR, the current outcome indicators cannot be taken to provide recommendations for undergoing PS or CR. The decision for prosthesis selection could be made mostly based on the surgeon's preference, indications and other indicators.

Intraoperative knee kinematics measured by computer-assisted navigation and intraoperative ligament balance have the potential to predict postoperative knee kinematics

This study was designed to analyze the effects of type of activity and cruciate ligament resection on knee kinematics and ligament balance after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine if intraoperative passive kinematics are associated with active kinematics. Fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were examined. The knees were mounted on a quadriceps-driven simulator. Cruciate-retaining (CR-TKA) and posterior-substituting (PS-TKA) TKA was performed using a contemporary knee system. Active flexion (closed-kinetic chain [CKC] and open-kinetic-chain [OKC]) and passive flexion were analyzed by recording the knee kinematics using a specifically developed application of an imageless navigation system. An electronic ligament balancer was used to measure the tibiofemoral gap under constant distraction pressure. The femur rotated externally relative to the tibia during passive and active CKC flexion. The femur translated anteriorly from 10° to 50° of flexion after TKA. Beyond 50° of flexion, the femur translated posteriorly in all surgical conditions. The femoral location during active CKC flexion was posterior relative to that during active OKC. Femoral rotation and translation during passive knee flexion correlated significantly with that during active knee flexion. Posterior tilt of the electronic ligament balancer was greater with CR-TKA than with PS-TKA and correlated significantly with the anteroposterior position of the femur. Statement of Clinical Significance: Intraoperative knee kinematics measured by computer-assisted navigation and intraoperative ligament balance have the potential to predict postoperative knee kinematics.

Limited effect of anatomical insert geometry on in vitro laxity in balanced anatomic posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The present study assessed the effect of insert articular surface geometry (anatomical versus conventional insert design) on anteroposterior (AP) translation and varus-valgus (VV) laxity in balanced posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondly, we evaluated if the AP translation and VV laxity in the reconstructed knee resembled the stability of the native knee.

METHODS

Nine fresh-frozen full-leg cadaver specimens were used in this study. After testing the native knee, anatomical components of a PCL-retaining implant were implanted. The knee joints were subjected to anteriorly and posteriorly directed forces (at 20° and 90° flexion) and varus-valgus stresses (at 20°, 45° and 90° flexion) in both non-weightbearing and weightbearing situations in a knee kinematics simulator. Measurements were performed in the native knee, TKA with anatomical insert geometry (3° built-in varus, medial concave, lateral convex), and TKA with symmetrical insert geometry.

RESULTS

In weightbearing conditions, anterior translations ranged between 2.6 and 3.9 mm at 20° flexion and were < 1 mm at 90° flexion. Posterior translation at 20° flexion was 2.7 mm for the native knee versus 4.0 mm (p = 0.047) and 7.0 mm (p = 0.02) for the symmetrical insert and the anatomical insert, respectively. Posterior translation at 90° flexion was < 1.1 mm and not significantly different between the native knee and insert types. In non-weightbearing conditions, the anterior translation at 20° flexion was 5.9 mm for the symmetrical and 4.6 mm for the anatomical insert (n.s.), compared with 3.0 mm for the native knee (p = 0.02). The anterior translation at 90° flexion was significantly higher for the reconstructed knees (anatomical insert 7.0 mm; symmetrical insert 9.2 mm), compared with 1.6 mm for the native knee (both p = 0.02). Varus-valgus laxity at different flexion angles was independent of insert geometry. A valgus force in weightbearing conditions led to significantly more medial laxity (1°-3° opening) in the native knee at 45° and 90° flexion compared with the reconstructed knee for all flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

Insert geometry seems to have a limited effect with respect to AP translation and VV laxity, in the well-balanced PCL-retaining TKA with an anatomical femoral component. Secondly, AP translation and VV laxity in the reconstructed knee approximated the laxity of the native knee.

Stability with a Constrained Posterior Stabilized Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Compromise Durability

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in cases of complex deformity (e.g., ligamentous laxity, posttraumatic arthritis) may require prostheses with inherent varus-valgus stability greater than that of traditional posterior stabilized or cruciate-retaining implants. Here, we investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of TKA using a midlevel constraint (MLC) prosthesis. A retrospective review of 53 patients (62 knees) who underwent primary TKA with an MLC implant was performed. Short tibial stem extensions were utilized in 49 knees, and 13 knees received no stem extension. Mean follow-up time was 31.6 months (standard deviation [SD] = 10.0, range = 24-53). Preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Plain radiographs were reviewed for alignment, radiolucent lines, component loosening, and osteolysis. Patients who developed postoperative arthrofibrosis underwent manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Failure was defined as instability, component loosening, or need for revision surgery. Mean ROM significantly improved from 114.1 degrees (SD = 19.7 degrees) preoperatively to 123.5 degrees (SD = 12.2 degrees) at final follow-up (t = -3.43, p = 0.001). Thirty-seven knees initially presented with varus deformity (mean = 7.5 degrees, SD = 4.8 degrees), whereas 23 had valgus deformity (mean = 10.6 degrees, SD = 6.5 degrees), and 2 knees had neutral alignment. Following surgery, mean alignment was 4.3 degrees valgus (SD = 1.7 degrees, range = 0-8 degrees), representing a statistically significant improvement (t = 5.29, p < 0.001). Six patients (9.7%) developed arthrofibrosis requiring MUA, which was irrespective of baseline ROM (p = 0.92) and consistent with 12% incidence reported in the literature. There were no significant differences in postoperative ROM (t = 0.38, p = 0.71), alignment (t = -0.22, p = 0.83), or incidence of arthrofibrosis (χ² = 0.07, p = 0.79) between short-stemmed and nonstemmed implants. There was no radiographic evidence of radiolucent lines, component loosening, or osteolysis in any patients. No patients required revision surgery. Use of an MLC prosthesis with primary femoral component in TKA resulted in satisfactory clinical and radiographic results with no evidence of component loosening, osteolysis, instability, or need for revision at minimum 2-year follow-up.

Asymmetrical tibial polyethylene geometry-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty does not fully restore in-vivo articular contact kinematics during strenuous activities

PURPOSE

A new CR TKA design with concave medial and convex lateral tibial polyethylene bearing components was introduced recently to improve functional outcomes. This study aimed to investigate in-vivo articular contact kinematics in unilateral asymmetrical tibial polyethylene geometry CR TKA patients during strenuous knee flexion activities.

METHODS

Fifteen unilateral CR TKA patients (68.4 ± 5.8 years; 6 male/9 female) were evaluated for both knees during sit-to-stand, single-leg deep lunges and step-ups using validated combined computer tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system. Medial and lateral condylar contact positions were quantified during weight-bearing flexion activities. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to determine if there is a significant difference in articular contact kinematics during strenuous flexion activities between CR TKA and the non-operated knees.

RESULTS

Contact excursions of the lateral condyle in CR TKAs were significantly more anteriorly located than the contralateral non-operated knee during sit-to-stand (3.7 ± 4.8 mm vs - 7.8 ± 4.3 mm) and step-ups (- 1.5 ± 3.2 mm vs - 6.3 ± 5.8 mm). Contact excursions of the lateral condyle in CR TKAs were significantly less laterally located than the contralateral non-operated knee during sit-to-stand (21.4 ± 2.8 mm vs 24.5 ± 4.7 mm) and single-leg deep lunges (22.6 ± 4.4 mm vs 26.2 ± 5.7 mm, p < 0.05). Lateral condyle posterior rollback was not fully restored in CR TKA patients during sit-to-stand (9.8 ± 6.7 mm vs 12.9 ± 8.3 mm) and step-ups (8.1 ± 4.8 mm vs 12.2 ± 6.4 mm). Lateral pivoting patterns were observed in 80%, 73% and 69% of patients during sit-to-stand, step-ups and single-leg deep lunges respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although lateral femoral rollback and lateral pivoting patterns were observed during strenuous functional daily activities, asymmetric contact kinematics still persisted in unilateral CR TKA patients. This suggests the specific investigated contemporary asymmetrical tibial polyethylene geometry CR TKA design evaluated in this study does not fully replicate healthy knee contact kinematics during strenuous functional daily activities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effect of weight-bearing in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during high-flexion activities

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of weight-bearing on the kinematics of the bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty design during high knee flexion activities.

METHODS

The kinematics of 21 bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties were evaluated under fluoroscopy, with two- and three-dimensional image registrations, during squatting (weight-bearing) and active-assisted knee flexion (non-weight-bearing). The following variables were measured: knee range of motion, axis of femoral rotation and varus-valgus angle relative to the tibial component, anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral contact points, and the kinematic pathway of the joint surfaces.

FINDINGS

From 20° to 100° of flexion, the femoral external rotation during weight-bearing was larger than that during non-weight-bearing. There were no differences in the varus-valgus angles between the two conditions. From 10° to 50° of flexion, the medial contact point during weight-bearing was located posterior to the point of contact during non-weight-bearing; this difference between the two weight-bearing conditions was significant. From 0° to 90° of flexion, the lateral contact point in weight-bearing was located posterior to the contact point in non-weight-bearing; this difference between the two weight-bearing conditions was also significant.

INTERPRETATION

The anteroposterior position of the medial and lateral contact points of the bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty design was significantly more posterior in the mid-range of knee flexion in weight-bearing than in non-weight-bearing. However, no anterior translation of the bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty design was observed. Therefore, bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty appears to have good anteroposterior stability throughout the range of knee flexion, regardless of the weight-bearing condition.

Comparison of in vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty between cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting insert

Background

The decision to choose cruciate retaining (CR) insert or cruciate substituting (CS) insert during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue. We hypothesized that there are different knee kinematics between CR and CS inserts and that a raised anterior lip design would offer a potential minimization of the paradoxical movement and provide joint stability. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare kinematics of a CR and CS TKA of the same single-radius design.

Methods

We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 20 knees with a CR TKA (10 knees in the CR insert and 10 knees in the CS insert). Patients were examined during deep knee flexion using fluoroscopy and femorotibial motion was determined using a 2- to 3-dimensional registration technique, which used computer-assisted design models to reproduce the spatial positions of the femoral and tibial components. We evaluated the knee range of motion (ROM), femoral axial rotation relative to the tibial component, anteroposterior translation, and kinematic pathway of the nearest point of the medial and lateral femoral condyles on the tibial tray.

Results

The average ROM was 121.0 ± 17.3° in CR and 110.8 ± 12.4° in CS. The amount of femoral axial rotation was 7.2 ± 3.9° in CR, and 7.4 ± 2.7° in CS. No significant difference was observed in the amount of anterior translation between CR and CS. The CR and CS inserts had a similar kinematic pattern up to 100° flexion that was central pivot up to 70° flexion and then paradoxical anterior femoral movement until 100° flexion.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that there was no significant difference between the inserts in knee kinematics. These kinematic results suggested that the increased anterior lip could not control anterior movement in the CS insert.

Weight-bearing status affects in vivo kinematics following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The effects of weight bearing (WB) on knee kinematics following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of WB on in vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing UKA during high knee flexion activities.

METHODS

The kinematics of UKA were evaluated under fluoroscopy during squatting (WB) and active-assisted knee flexion (non-weight bearing, NWB). Range of motion, femoral axis rotation relative to the tibia, anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral sides, and kinematic pathway were measured.

RESULTS

There were no differences in knee flexion range and external rotation of the femur in each flexion angle between the WB conditions. The amount of femoral external rotation between minimum flexion and 60° of flexion during WB was significantly larger than that during NWB, and that between 60° and 130° of flexion during NWB was significantly larger than that during WB. There were no differences in medial AP translation of the femur in each flexion angle between the WB conditions. However, on the lateral side, posterior translation of 52.9 ± 12.7% was observed between minimum flexion and 130° of flexion during WB. During NWB, there was no significant translation between minimum flexion and 60° of flexion; beyond 60° of flexion, posterior translation was 41.6 ± 8.7%. Between 20° and 80° of flexion, the lateral side in WB was located more posteriorly than in NWB (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Mobile-bearing UKA has good anterior stability throughout the range of knee flexion. WB status affects the in vivo kinematics following mobile-bearing UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

In Vivo Kinematics of Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty with Anatomical Articular Surface under High-Flexion Conditions

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) recreates normal knee movement by preserving the anterior cruciate and posterior cruciate ligaments. However, in vivo kinematics of BCR-TKA with the anatomical articular surface remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate in vivo kinematics of BCR-TKA with the anatomical articular surface during high-flexion activities. For this purpose, 17 knees after BCR-TKA with an anatomical articular surface were examined. Under fluoroscopy, each patient performed squatting and cross-legged sitting motions. To estimate the spatial position and orientation of the knee, a two-dimensional or three-dimensional registration technique was used. Rotation, varus-valgus angle, and anteroposterior translation of medial and lateral contact points of the femoral component relative to the tibial component were evaluated in each flexion angle. The results showed that from 80 to 110° of flexion, the femoral external rotation during squatting was significantly larger than that during cross-legged sitting. At maximum flexion, the knees during sitting indicated significantly more varus alignment than during squatting. During squatting, a medial pivot pattern was observed from minimum flexion to 10° flexion, with no significant movement beyond 10° of flexion. Conversely, during cross-legged sitting, no significant movement was detected from minimum flexion to 60° of flexion, with a medial pivot beyond 60° of flexion. Therefore, the knees showed relatively normal kinematics after BCR-TKA with an anatomical articular surface; however, it varied during high-flexion activities depending on the activity.

Posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty reproduces natural joint laxity compared to normal in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair cadaveric study

PURPOSE

As the goal of kinematic aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to preserve soft tissue tension to the native knee, many KA surgeons recommend cruciate-retaining (CR) prosthesis. However, how a posterior-stabilizing (PS) prosthesis affects the biomechanics of a KA TKA remains unclear. This cadaveric study tested the hypothesis that a PS prosthesis in KA TKA would produce biomechanics similar to CR prosthesis and KA TKA with a PS prosthesis would produce more native knee biomechanics than mechanical aligned (MA) TKA with PA prosthesis.

METHODS

Fourteen cadaver knees (7 pairs) were mounted on a knee-testing system to measure knee motion during flexion. For each pair, 1 knee was assigned to KA TKA and the other to MA TKA. In the KA TKA group, the native knee, CR TKA, and PS TKA were tested sequentially. MA TKA was performed using conventional measured resection techniques with a PS prosthesis. All kinematics were measured and compared with the native knee before and after surgery.

RESULTS

A PS prosthesis restored femoral rollback similar to a CR prosthesis. CR TKA showed less lateral rollback at knee flexion ≤ 60° than the native knee. There were no differences in soft tissue tensions among the native knee, CR, and PS prosthesis, except in varus tension at 30° of flexion. Varus tension of CR TKA was larger than those of PS TKA and the native knee after KA TKA with < 1 degree difference. Meanwhile, KA TKA achieved knee motion that was closer to the native knee than did MA TKA at ≥ 60° of flexion when using a PS prosthesis. There were no differences in soft tissue tension between KA-PS and MA-PS TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

After KA TKA, a PS prosthesis affords similar femoral rollback and soft tissue tension when compared with a CR prosthesis. A PS TKA may be a feasible strategy for patients requiring a PS prosthesis when performing KA TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Laboratory study, I.

A Validated Forward Solution Dynamics Mathematical Model of the Knee Joint: Can It Be an Effective Alternative for Implant Evaluation?

BACKGROUND

Mathematical modeling is among the most common computational tools for assessing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) mechanics of different implant designs and surgical alignments. The main objective of this study is to describe and validate a forward solution mathematical of the knee joint to investigate the effects of TKA design and surgical conditions on TKA outcomes.

METHODS

A 12-degree of freedom mathematical model of the human knee was developed. This model includes the whole lower extremity of the human body and comprises major muscles and ligaments at the knee joint. The muscle forces are computed using a proportional-integral-derivative controller, and the joint forces are calculated using a contact detection algorithm. The model was validated using telemetric implants and fluoroscopy, and the sensitivity analyses were performed to determine how sensitive the model is to both implant design, which was analyzed by varying medial conformity of the polyethylene, and surgical alignment, which was analyzed by varying the posterior tibial tilt.

RESULTS

The model predicted the tibiofemoral joint forces with an average accuracy of 0.14× body weight (BW), 0.13× BW, and 0.17× BW root-mean-square errors for lateral, medial, and total tibiofemoral contact forces. With fluoroscopy, the kinematics were validated with an average accuracy of 0.44 mm, 0.62 mm, and 0.77 root-mean-square errors for lateral anteroposterior position, medial anteroposterior position, and axial rotation, respectively. Increasing medial conformity resulted in reducing the paradoxical anterior sliding midflexion. Furthermore, increasing posterior tibial slopes shifted the femoral contact point more posterior on the bearing and reduced the tension in the posterior cruciate ligament.

CONCLUSION

A forward solution dynamics model of the knee joint was developed and validated using telemetry devices and fluoroscopy data. The results of this study suggest that a validated mathematical model can be used to predict the effects of component design and surgical conditions on TKA outcomes.

Videofluoroscopic Evaluation of the Influence of a Gradually Reducing Femoral Radius on Joint Kinematics During Daily Activities in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical anterior translation in midflexion is reduced in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with a gradually reducing femoral radius, when compared to a 2-radii design. This reduction has been shown in finite element model simulations, in vitro tests, intraoperatively, and recently also in vivo during a lunge and unloaded flexion-extension. However, TKA kinematics are task dependent and this reduction has not been tested for gait activities.

METHODS

Thirty good outcome subjects (≥1 year postoperatively) with a unilateral cruciate-retaining TKA with a gradually reducing (n = 15) or dual (n = 15) femoral radius design were assessed during 5 complete cycles of level walking, stair descent (0.18-m steps), deep knee bend, and sitting down onto and standing up from a chair, using a moving fluoroscope (25 Hz, 1 ms shutter time). Kinematic data were extracted by 2D/3D image registration.

RESULTS

Tibiofemoral ranges of motion for flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, internal-external rotation, and anteroposterior (AP) translation were similar for both groups, whereas the pattern of AP translation-flexion-coupling differed. The subjects with the dual-radii design showed a sudden change in direction of AP translation around 30° of flexion, which was not present in the subjects with the gradually reducing femoral radius design.

CONCLUSION

Through the unique ability of moving fluoroscopy, the present study confirmed that the gradually reducing femoral radii eliminated the paradoxical sudden anterior translation at 30° present in the dual-radii design in vivo during daily activities, including gait and stair descent.

J-curve design total knee arthroplasty: the posterior stabilized shows wider medial pivot compared to the cruciate retaining during chair raising

PURPOSE

Which total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design represents the better solution to restore a correct knee biomechanics is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare posterior stabilized (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) version of the same TKA design (femoral component with an anatomic sagittal radius-J-curve design) by the use of dynamic Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). The hypothesis was that the two models influence differently in vivo knee kinematic.

METHODS

A cohort of 16 randomly selected patients was evaluated 9 months after surgery: Zimmer PERSONA® was implanted, eight with CR design and eight with PS design. The kinematic evaluations were performed using a Dynamic RSA (BI-STAND DRX 2) developed in our Institute, during the execution of the sit-to-stand motor task. The motion parameters were obtained using the Grood and Suntay decomposition and the low-point kinematics methods.

RESULTS

PS TKA lateral femoral compartment had a wider anterior translation (17 ± 2 mm) than the medial one (11 ± 2 mm), while the two compartments of CR TKA showed a similar anterior translation (medial: 9 ± 2 mm/lateral: 11 ± 2 mm). T test for comparison between CR and PS TKA of antero-posterior translation showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the flexion range between 15° and 40°. The CR prosthesis did not anteriorly translate during flexion. The PS design translated anteriorly showing a roll-forward mechanism during extension from 80° to 18° of flexion and a posterior translation from 18° to 0°. The same significant differences (p < 0.05) between the PS and CR groups were found comparing the low-point positions of the femoral condyles in the range of flexion between 25° and 40° for the medial compartment and between 15° and 25° for the lateral compartment.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic RSA was able to investigate for the first time in vivo the kinematic behaviour of PS and CR version of the same TKA J-curve design. PS type showed a medial pivot during sit-to-stand motion task, while the CR type showed a cylindrical movement. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of different TKA designs on clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty reproduces in vivo kinematics of normal knees to a lower extent than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to clarify the natural knee kinematics provided by bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) compared with those of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and normal knees.

METHODS

Volunteers and patients who had undergone UKA and BCR-TKA with anatomical articular surface performed squatting motion under fluoroscopy. To estimate the knee's spatial position and orientation, a two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique was used. The rotation angle and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral sides of the femur relative to the tibia in each flexion angle were directly evaluated using the same local coordinate system and their differences amongst the three groups were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc pairwise comparison.

RESULTS

From 0° to 10° of flexion, the femoral external rotation angle of BCR-TKA knees was significantly greater than that of normal and UKA knees and the medial side of BCR-TKA knees was significantly more anteriorly located than that of normal and UKA knees. From 40° to 50° of flexion, the medial side of UKA knees was significantly more posteriorly located than that of normal and BCR-TKA knees. From 30° to 120° of flexion, the lateral side of BCR-TKA knees was significantly more anteriorly located than that of normal and UKA knees.

CONCLUSION

The in vivo kinematics of BCR-TKA knees reproduces those of normal knees to a lower extent than those of UKA knees. Thus, BCR-TKA with anatomical articular surface reproduces in vivo kinematics of normal knees to a lower extent than UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Polyethylene spinout in the Attune® Cruciate-Retaining Rotating-Platform (CR RP) total knee arthroplasty performed with a cruciate-sacrificing and measured-resection technique

INTRODUCTION

Polyethylene (PE) spinout is a known but uncommon complication when using a mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design. Sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is within the manufacturer's recommendations for the Attune® Cruciate-Retaining Rotating-Platform (CR RP) knee design.

AIM

To discuss the potential aetiology and prevention of spinout in the Attune® CR RP knee.

METHODS

We used a retrospective radiological review from two centres reporting a higher rate of spinout in the Attune® CR RP knee using a cruciate-sacrificing and measured-resection technique when compared to a gap-balancing technique. Three hundred and thirty-two patients were evaluated over a 3-year period.

RESULTS

There were 8 out of 279 (2.86%) cases of spinout in our first cohort of patients using a measured-resection technique. There were 0 out of 53 cases of spinout in our second cohort of patients where a gap-balancing technique was used. One spinout was reduced closed, the other seven were initially revised to a thicker RP insert of the same design. Of these seven, three underwent a further revision TKA and one patient required a knee fusion/arthrodesis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports a higher incidence of PE spinout in the Attune® CR RP TKA when a measured-resection technique in combination with PCL resection is performed. We recommend a gap-balancing technique with conservative soft-tissue release if the surgeon is planning to sacrifice the PCL in the Attune® CR RP.

In Vivo Knee Kinematics for a Cruciate Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasty Having Both a Symmetrical Femoral and Tibial Component

BACKGROUND

Early total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs were symmetrical, but lead to complications due to over-constraint leading to loosening and poor flexion. Next-generation TKAs have been designed to include asymmetry, pertaining to the trochlear groove, femoral condylar shapes, and/or the tibial component. More recently, an advanced posterior cruciate sacrificing (PCS) TKA was designed to include both a symmetrical femoral component with a patented V-shaped trochlear groove and a symmetrical tibial component with an ultracongruent insert, in an attempt to reduce inventory costs. Because previous PCS TKA designs produced variable results, the objective of this study is to determine and evaluate the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with this symmetrical TKA.

METHODS

Twenty-one subjects, implanted with symmetrical PCS fixed-bearing TKA, were asked to perform a weight-bearing deep knee bend (DKB) while under fluoroscopic surveillance. A 3-dimensional to 2-dimensional registration technique was used to determine each subject's anteroposterior translation of lateral and medial femoral condyles as well as tibiofemoral axial rotation and their weight-bearing knee flexion.

RESULTS

During the DKB, the average active maximum weight-bearing flexion was 111.7° ± 13.3°. On average, from full extension to maximum knee flexion, subjects experienced -2.5 ± 2.0 mm of posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle and 2.5 ± 2.2 mm of medial condyle motion in the anterior direction. This medial condyle motion was consistent for the majority of the subjects, with the lateral condyle exhibiting rollback from 0° to 60° of flexion and then experienced an average anterior motion of 0.3 mm from 60° to 90° of knee flexion. On average, the subjects in this study experienced 6.6°± 3.3° of axial rotation, with most of the rotation occurring in early flexion, averaging 4.9°.

CONCLUSION

Although subjects in this study were implanted with a symmetrical PCS TKA, they did experience femoral rollback of the lateral condyle and a normal-like pattern of axial rotation, although less in magnitude than the normal knee. The normal axial rotation pattern occurred because the lateral condyle rolled in the posterior direction, while the medial condyle moved in the anterior direction. Interestingly, the magnitude of posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation for subjects in this study was similar in magnitude reported in previous studies pertaining to asymmetrical TKA designs. It is proposed that more patients be analyzed having this TKA implanted by other surgeons.

Kinematic Performance of Gradually Variable Radius Posterior-Stabilized Primary TKA During Various Activities: An In Vivo Study Using Fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with gradually variable radii (G-curve) femoral condylar geometry is now available. It is believed that a G-curve design would lead to more mid-flexion stability leading to reduced incidence of paradoxical anterior slide. The objective of this study was to assess the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with this type of TKA under various conditions of daily living.

METHODS

Tibiofemoral kinematics of 35 patients having posterior-stabilized TKA with G-curve design were analyzed using fluoroscopy while performing three activities: weight-bearing deep knee bend, gait, and walking down a ramp. The subjects were assessed for range of motion, condylar translation, axial rotation, cam-spine engagement, and condylar lift-off.

RESULTS

The average weight-bearing flexion during deep knee bend was 111.4°. On average, the subjects exhibited 5.4 mm of posterior rollback of the lateral condyle and 2.0 mm of the medial condyle from full extension to maximum knee flexion. The femur consistently rotated externally with flexion, and the average axial rotation was 5.2°. Overall movement of the condyles during gait and ramp-down activity was small. No incidence of condylar lift-off was observed.

CONCLUSION

Subjects in this study experienced consistent magnitudes of posterior femoral rollback and external rotation of the femur with weight-bearing flexion. The variation is similar to that previously reported for normal knee where the lateral condyle moves consistently posterior compared to the medial condyle. Subjects experienced low overall mid-flexion paradoxical anterior sliding and no incidence of condylar lift-off leading to mid-flexion stability.

Are TKA Kinematics During Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises Associated with Patient-reported Outcomes? A Preliminary Analysis

BACKGROUND

Kinematic patterns after TKA can vary considerably from those of the native knee. It is unknown, however, if there is a relationship between a given kinematic pattern and patient satisfaction after TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Is there an association between kinematic patterns as measured by AP translation during open kinetic chain flexion-extension and closed kinetic chain exercises (rising from a chair and squatting) and a custom aggregate of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that targeted symptoms, pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sports, quality of life (QOL), and patient satisfaction after TKA?

METHODS

Thirty patients who underwent TKA between 2014 and 2016 were tested at a minimum follow-up of 6 months. As three different implants were used, per implant the first 10 patients who presented themselves at the follow-up consultations and were able to bend the knee at least 90°, were recruited. Tibiofemoral kinematics during an open kinetic chain flexion-extension and closed kinetic chain exercises-rising from a chair and squatting-were analyzed using fluoroscopy. A two-step cluster analysis was performed, resulting in two clusters of patients who answered the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the satisfaction subscore of the Knee Society Score questionnaires. Cluster 1 (CL1) consisted of patients with better (good-to-excellent) patient-reported outcome measures scores (high-PROMs cluster); Cluster 2 (CL2) consisted of patients with poorer scores (low-PROMs cluster). Tibiofemoral kinematics were compared between patients in these clusters by performing a Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Concerning open kinetic chain flexion-extension, there was no difference in kinematic patterns between the patients in the high-PROMs cluster and those in the low-PROMs cluster, with the numbers available. However, during the closed-chain kinetic exercises, medially, initial anterior translation (femur relative to tibia) was found in patients in Cluster 1 during early flexion, but in those in Cluster 2, translation was steeper and ran more anteriorly (CL1 -1.5 ± 7.3%; CL2 -8.5 ± 4.4%); mean difference 7.0% [95% CI 0.1 to 13.8]; p = 0.046). In midflexion, the femur did not translate anterior nor posterior in relation to the tibia, resulting in a stable medial compartment in Cluster 1, whereas Cluster 2 had already started translating posteriorly (CL1 -0.7 ± 3.5%; CL2 3.4 ± 3.6%; mean difference -4.1% [95% CI -7.0 to -1.2]; p = 0.008). There was no difference, with the numbers available, between the two clusters with respect to posterior translation in deep flexion. Laterally, there was small initial anterior translation in early flexion, followed by posterior translation in midflexion that continued in deep flexion. Patients in Cluster 1 demonstrated more pronounced posterior translation in deep flexion laterally than patients in Cluster 2 did (CL1 8.3 ± 5.2%; CL2 3.5 ± 4.5%); mean difference 4.9% [95% CI 0.6 to 9.1]; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

This study of total knee kinematics suggests that during closed kinetic chain movements, patients with poor PROM scores after TKA experience more anterior translation on the medial side followed by a medial mid-flexion instability and less posterior translation on the lateral side in deep flexion than patients with good PROM scores. The relationship of kinematic variations with patient-reported outcomes including satisfaction must be further elaborated and translated into TKA design and position. Reproduction of optimal kinematic patterns during TKA could be instrumental in improving patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Future expansion of the study group is needed to confirm these findings.Level of Evidence Level II, therapeutic study.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics

Knee kinematics is an analysis of motion pattern that is utilized to assess a comparative, biomechanical performance of healthy nonimplanted knees, injured nonimplanted knees, and various prosthetic knee designs. Unfortunately, a consensus between implanted knee kinematics and outcomes has not been reached. One might hypothesize that the kinematic variances between the nonimplanted and implanted knee might play a role in patient dissatisfaction following TKA. There is a wide range of TKA designs available today. With such variety, it is important for surgeons and engineers to understand the various geometries and kinematic profiles of available prostheses. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with the pertinent information related to TKA kinematics.

Bicruciate-stabilised total knee arthroplasty provides good functional stability during high-flexion weight-bearing activities

PURPOSE

Bicruciate-stabilised total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA) uses a dual-post-cam mechanism as a substitute for the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), with the surface geometry providing additional guidance for axial rotation and posterior translation. However, the effect of weight-bearing on the kinematics of BCS-TKA has not been investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the effect of weight-bearing on the kinematics of BCS-TKA during high-flexion activities.

METHODS

The kinematics of 11 BCS-TKAs were evaluated under fluoroscopy, with two- and three-dimensional image registration, during squatting weight-bearing and active-assisted knee flexion non-weight-bearing. The following variables were measured: knee range of motion, axis of femoral rotation relative to the tibial component, anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial contact point, kinematic path of the joint surfaces, lateral femorotibial contact point, and anterior and post-cam engagement.

RESULTS

The weight-bearing condition did not influence the range of knee flexion, axis of femoral rotation, medial pivot pattern during early flexion, or bicondylar rollback beyond mid-flexion. With regard to AP translation, both the medial and lateral contact points had more posterior locations in weight-bearing than in non-weight-bearing at the mid-flexion angle. Anterior engagement was identified in 6/11 knees (54.5%) in weight-bearing and 4/11 knees (36.3%) in non-weight-bearing. Post-cam engagement was observed in all knees, with the angle of flexion at engagement being larger in weight-bearing than in non-weight-bearing.

CONCLUSION

Although weight-bearing resulted in a posterior location of the medial and lateral contact points of the BCS-TKA design compared with non-weight-bearing in the mid-range of knee flexion, the amount of anterior translation was small overall. Therefore, BCS-TKA provides good stability during high-flexion weight-bearing activities. However, BCS-TKA is associated with high rate of the anterior engagement during early flexion. Therefore, understanding a patient's activities is an important factor when selecting the most appropriate TKA method.

What to Know for Selecting Cruciate-Retaining or Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

There has been continuing debate about the superiority of cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA for obtaining knee joint stability with functional improvement. Many surgeons tend to select the type of prosthesis on the basis of their own training and experience. However, the selection must be based on a great store of knowledge rather than on the surgeon's preconceptions or preferences. CR TKA may not be feasible in certain settings: posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, severe deformity, and history of trauma or surgery. The risk of conversion from a CR type prosthesis to a PS type prosthesis might be high in patients with severe flexion contracture, steep posterior slope, and small femoral component size. The above factors should be carefully considered for an appropriate selection of the type of prosthesis. The surgeon should have a clear understanding on the technical differences between CR and PS TKAs. The amount of distal femoral resection, femoral component size, and tibial slope are particularly crucial for successful TKA. Unless they are meticulously determined, stiffness or instability will ensue, which can be difficult to resolve afterwards. There was no notable difference in functional outcome, range of motion, kinematics, and survival rate between CR and PS TKAs in most previous studies. Strict adherence to surgical indications and solid understanding of differences in surgical principles might be more important than the selection of either a CR or PS prosthesis.

Effect of polyethylene conformity on total knee arthroplasty early clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty is a successful procedure in treating subjects with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. The objective of this matched study was to evaluate subjective patient satisfaction and clinical and radiological outcomes in two groups of patients undergoing primary TKA using an identical third-generation design with different conformity in the polyethylene insert.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients undergoing TKA because of knee osteoarthritis were randomized in two matched groups. Group A included 50 Posterior-Stabilized (PS) implants, while group B included 50 Medially Congruent (MC) implants. The surgical technique was identical: gap balancing in extension and measured resection in flexion; cruciate ligaments were always removed; the coronal alignment followed the mechanical axis and the tibial slope was set at 3° in the PS group and 5° in the MC. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Society Score (KSS) were assessed preoperatively and at 2 year minimum follow-up. Two-sample T test statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

All patients were available at final follow-up: there were no preoperative statistical differences between the two groups in the average preoperative ROM (PS 112°, MC 108°; n.s.), average preoperative KSS (PS 64.4, MC 63.7; n.s.), average preoperative OKS (PS 19.6; MC 19.0; n.s.), and average BMI (PS 34.40, MC 34.60; n.s.). At final follow-up, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in the average OKS (PS 40,5; MC 41.1; n.s.) and in the average KSS (PS 161,5, MC 165,7; n.s.). We found a statistically but not clinically significant difference at final ROM: the average maximum active flexion was 120° in the PS group and 123° in the MC group (s.s.).

CONCLUSION

This study evaluated two biomechanically different polyethylene inserts in the same TKA design, showing that reducing the level of intra-articular conformity had minimal effects on PROMs and objective short-term clinical results but a potentially beneficial effect on ROM. This study suggests that, once a satisfactory intra-operative stability is obtained, the minimal level of constraint should be used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Knee implant kinematics are task-dependent

Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become a standard surgical procedure for relieving pain, knowledge of the in vivo knee joint kinematics throughout common functional activities of daily living is still missing. The goal of this study was to analyse knee joint motion throughout complete cycles of daily activities in TKA subjects to establish whether a significant difference in joint kinematics occurs between different activities. Using dynamic videofluoroscopy, we assessed tibio-femoral kinematics in six subjects throughout complete cycles of walking, stair descent, sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit. The mean range of condylar anterior-posterior translation exhibited clear task dependency across all subjects. A significantly larger anterior-posterior translation was observed during stair descent compared to level walking and stand-to-sit. Local minima were observed at approximately 30° flexion for different tasks, which were more prominent during loaded task phases. This characteristic is likely to correspond to the specific design of the implant. From the data presented in this study, it is clear that the flexion angle alone cannot fully explain tibio-femoral implant kinematics. As a result, it seems that the assessment of complete cycles of the most frequent functional activities is imperative when evaluating the behaviour of a TKA design in vivo.

Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

AIM

A meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing cruciate retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS) in primary total knee arthroplasty was performed. The outcomes of interest were the Knee Society Rating System, clinical (KSCS) and functional (KSFS) subscales, joint range of motion (ROM), surgical duration and further complications (anterior knee pain, instability and revision rate).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The search was conducted in July 2018, accessing the following databases: Cochrane Systematic Reviews, Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and Google Scholar. We included only clinical trials level of evidence I and II. During the statistical analysis, we excluded all the studies that affect negatively the I² test, in order to achieve more reliable results. For the methodological quality assessment we referred to the PEDro score. The risk of publication's bias was evaluated by the funnel plots across all the comparisons.

RESULTS

The PEDro score reported a good methodological quality assessment. The funnel plot detected a very low risk of publication's bias. We included in this study 36 articles, counting a total of 4052 patients and 4884 procedures. The mean follow-up term for both groups was 3.39 years. The ROM resulted in an overall estimate effect of 2.18° in favor of the PS group. The overall WOMAC showed a result in favor of the PS group. The overall estimate effect of the KSCS was 0.02% higher in the CR group. The KSFS showed an overall estimate effect of 2.09% in favor of the PS group. Concerning the surgical duration, the estimate effect resulted in 6.87 min shorter in the CR group. No differences were reported across the two groups regarding anterior knee pain, knee joint instability or revision rate.

CONCLUSION

Both the prosthetic implants provided to be a safety and feasible solution to treat end-stage knee joint degeneration. The PS implants reported improvements in the knee range of motion and a prolongation of the surgical time. No clinically relevant dissimilarities concerning the analyzed scores were evidenced. No statistically significant relevant differences in complications were detected.

Comparison of the biomechanical effect of posterior condylar offset and kinematics between posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The effect of the changes in the femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) on anterior-posterior (AP) translation and internal-external (IE) rotation in cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics in CR and PS TKA with respect to the difference in prosthetic design and PCO change through a computational simulation.

METHODS

We developed three-dimensional finite element models with the different PCOs of ±1, ±2 and ±3 mm in the posterior direction using CR and PS TKA. We performed the simulation with different PCOs under a deep knee bend condition and evaluated the kinematics for the AP and IE in CR and PS TKA.

RESULTS

The more tibiofemoral (TF) translation in the posterior direction was found as PCO translated in posterior direction for both CR and PS TKA compared to the neutral position. However, the change of the AP translation with respect to the PCO change in CR TKA was greater than PS TKA. The more TF external rotation was found as PCO translated in the anterior direction for both CR and PS TKA compared to the neutral position. However, unlike the TF translation, the TF rotation was not influenced by the PCO change in both CR and PS TKA.

CONCLUSION

The PCO magnitude was influenced by a postoperative change in the kinematics in CR TKA although a relatively smaller effect was observed in PS TKA. Hence, surgeons should be aware of the PCO change, especially for CR TKA.

Posterior tibial slope impacts intraoperatively measured mid-flexion anteroposterior kinematics during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Posterior tibial slope (PTS) for cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually pre-determined by the surgeon. Limited information is available comparing different choices of PTS on the kinematics of the CR TKA, independent of the balancing of the extension gap. This study hypothesized that with the same balanced extension gap, the choice of PTS significantly impacts the intraoperatively measured kinematics of CR TKA.

METHODS

Navigated CR TKAs were performed on seven fresh-frozen cadavers with healthy knees and intact posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). A custom designed tibial baseplate was implanted to allow in situ modification of the PTS, which altered the flexion gap but maintained the extension gap. Knee kinematics were measured by performing passive range of motion (ROM) tests from full extension to 120° of flexion on the intact knee and CR TKAs with four different PTSs (1°, 4°, 7°, and 10°). The measured kinematics were compared across test conditions to assess the impact of PTS.

RESULTS

With a consistent extension gap, the change of PTS had significant impact on the anteroposterior (AP) kinematics of the CR TKA knees in mid-flexion range (45°-90°), but not so much for the high-flexion range (90°-120°). No considerable impacts were found on internal/external (I/E) rotation and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. However, the findings on the individual basis suggested the impact of PTS on I/E rotation and HKA angle may be patient-specific.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggested that the choice of PTS had the greatest impact on the mid-flexion AP translation among the intraoperatively measured kinematics. This impact may be considered while making surgical decisions in the context of AP kinematics. When using a tibial component designed with "center" pivoting PTS, a surgeon may be able to fine tune the PTS to achieve proper mid-flexion AP stability.

Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability

PURPOSE

It is unknown whether the conforming superiority of ultracongruent (UC) inserts over posterior stabilized (PS) inserts, due to an increased anterior lip for prevention of anterior displacement of the condyles during knee flexion, leads to better knee scores or greater knee stability in arthroplasty patients. This meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes, intraoperative kinematics, sagittal stability, and range of motion (ROM) between groups with either UC or PS inserts in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Studies that recorded clinical outcomes, intraoperative kinematics, sagittal stability, and ROM in patients who underwent primary TKA with UC or PS inserts were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses based on differences in flexion angles were performed for intraoperative kinematics.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The UC and PS insert groups reported similar pain scores (95% CI - 0.15 to 0.16; n.s.) and function scores (95% CI - 0.30 to 0.14; n.s.). In contrast, femoral rotation during flexion (95% CI - 0.06 to 6.35; p = 0.05), posterior femoral translation during flexion (95% CI - 2.74 to - 0.15; p = 0.03), tibial sagittal laxity at 90° (95% CI 2.91 to 7.72; p < 0.0001), and ROM (95% CI - 4.84 to - 1.53; p = 0.0002) differed significantly between the groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that the pooled data for femoral rotation were significantly different between groups: 60°, 4.09 (p < 0.00001); 90°, 7.94 (p < 0.00001); and 120°, 8.16 (p < 0.00001). Furthermore, pooled data for posterior femoral translation were significantly different between groups: 90°, - 3.70 (p < 0.00001); and 120°, - 3.96 (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups with UC and PS inserts. However, the UC insert group showed significantly greater external femoral rotation, less posterior femoral translation, greater tibial laxity in the sagittal plane, and less ROM than the PS insert group. Based on the results of the current meta-analysis, in substituting the PCL, PS inserts are preferable to UC inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability, even though both inserts have equivalent clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level II.

Reduced tibial strain-shielding with extraosseous total knee arthroplasty revision system

•

A novel extracortical support system for revision of failed knee prostheses.

•

Shown to reduce metaphyseal stress-shielding versus intramedullary stem fixation.

•

Reduces bone loss and enables bone grafting of defects after implant loosening.

•

Enables use of conventional prosthesis in a revision scenario.

Background

Revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) has poorer results than primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the prostheses are invasive and cause strain-shielding of the bones near the knee. This paper describes an RTKA system with extracortical fixation. It was hypothesised that this would reduce strain-shielding compared with intramedullary fixation.

Methods

Twelve replica tibiae were prepared for full-field optical surface strain analysis. They were either left intact, implanted with RTKA components with cemented intramedullary fixation stems, or implanted with a novel design with a tibial tray subframe supported by two extracortical fixation plates and screw fixation. They were loaded to simulate peak walking and stair climbing loads and the surface strains were measured using digital image correlation. The measurements were validated with strain gauge rosettes.

Results

Compared to the intact bone model, extracortical fixation reduced surface strain-shielding by half versus intramedullary fixation. For all load cases and bone regions examined, the extracortical implant shielded 8–27% of bone strain, whereas the intramedullary component shielded 37–56%.

Conclusions

The new fixation design, which offers less bone destruction than conventional RTKA, also reduced strain-shielding. Clinically, this design may allow greater rebuilding of bone loss, and should increase long-term fixation.

High tibial slope correlates with increased posterior tibial translation in healthy knees

PURPOSE

Notwithstanding the importance of the tibial slope (TS) for anterior tibial translation, little information is available regarding the implications on posterior laxity, particularly in healthy subjects. It was hypothesized that increased TS is associated with decreased posterior tibial translation (PTT) in healthy knees.

METHODS

A total of 124 stress radiographs of healthy knees were enrolled in this study. Tibial slope and the posterior tibial translation were evaluated using a Telos device with a 150-N force at 90° of knee flexion. Two blinded observers reviewed independently on two different occasions.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four patients [35 females and 89 males; 41 (range 18-75) years] were enrolled in this study, with a mean PTT of 2.8 mm (±1.9 mm; range 0-8 mm) and a mean TS of 8.6° (±2.6°; range 1°-14°). Pearson correlation showed a significant correlation between the PTT and TS in the overall patient cohort (P < 0.0001) with r = 0.76 and R ² = 0.58. There was no statistical difference between female and male patients regarding the PTT or the TS. Subgrouping of the patient cohort (four groups with n = 31) according to their TS (groups I < 7°; II = 7°-8.5°; III = 9°-10.5°; IV ≥ 11°) revealed significant differences between each subgroup, respectively. Furthermore, there was a weak but significant correlation between age and PTT (P = 0.004, r = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

In addition to the substantial variance in tibial slope and posterior laxity among healthy knees, high tibial slope significantly correlates with increased posterior tibial translation. Increasing age is further associated with a greater magnitude of posterior tibial translation. Consequently, knowledge of the tibial slope facilitates simple estimation of posterior knee laxity, which is mandatory for PCL reconstruction and knee arthroplasty.

Fracture of the insert cone of a polyethylene liner in a failed posterior-stabilized, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty

Failures unique to posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses rarely include polyethylene post fractures but have been described. We report a case involving a fracture of the distal insert cone of a rotating-platform (RP) polyethylene liner in a primary total knee arthroplasty. This case highlights a 67-year-old male presenting with new-onset knee pain and recurrent effusions with osteolysis 11 years following placement of a posterior-stabilized, RP total knee arthroplasty. At the time of revision surgery, the polyethylene insert cone was found to be fractured just below the junction between cone and the body of the insert. Liner exchange, synovectomy, and osteolytic-defect curettage and cement packing were performed. One year following revision surgery, the patient is without pain and has returned to function without limitations. Clinicians must be aware of this possible failure with RP prostheses in the setting of pain with a stable knee, recurrent aseptic effusions, and osteolysis.

Changes in total knee arthroplasty design affect in-vivo kinematics in a redesigned total knee system: A fluoroscopy study

BACKGROUND

Journey II Bi-Cruciate-Stabilized knee system was designed to overcome the complications of Journey Bi-Cruciate-Stabilized, including ilio-tibial band inflammation and episodes of dislocation. The purpose of this study was to assess differences in knee kinematics between the first and second-generation design by means of video-fluoroscopy. Re-designed prosthesis in-vivo kinematics was analyzed during activities of daily living and results were eventually compared with those of the previous system, as reported in a previously published study. It was hypothesized that changes in components' design influences replaced knee's kinematic patterns.

METHODS

Sixteen patients (3 males, 13 females) implanted with the redesigned prosthesis were assessed by video-fluoroscopy during stair-climbing, chair-rising and leg-extension at 8 months of follow-up. Patterns of axial rotation and antero-posterior motion of the medial and lateral femoral condyles were obtained. Range of Motion and International Knee Society Score were recorded pre- and post-operatively. Student t-tests were applied to compare the mean of each interesting variables.

FINDINGS

The comparison of the kinematics of the two designs revealed similar patterns of axial rotation, with progressive femoral external rotation in flexion and reduced absolute values of displacement for the new system. Reduced posterior displacements of the medial and lateral condyles were observed in Journey II patients. In terms of absolute location, the lateral condyle in the redesigned prosthesis showed a more anterior position on the tibial-baseplate embedded coordinate system at maximal flexion.

INTERPRETATION

Design changes in the recently-introduced total knee system contributed to modify its in-vivo knee kinematics as demonstrated by video-fluoroscopy.

Influence of Increased Posterior Tibial Slope in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Knee Joint Biomechanics: A Computational Simulation Study

BACKGROUND

The reconstructed posterior tibial slope (PTS) plays a significant role in restoring knee kinematics in cruciate-retaining-total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A few studies have reported the effect of the PTS on biomechanics.

METHODS

This study investigates the effect of the PTS on tibiofemoral (TF) kinematics, patellofemoral (PF) contact stress, and forces at the quadriceps, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and collateral ligament after cruciate-retaining-TKA using computer simulations. The simulation for the validated TKA finite element model was performed under deep knee bend condition. All analyses were repeated from -3° to 15° PTS in increments of 3°.

RESULTS

The kinematics on the TF joint translated increasingly posteriorly when the PTS increased. Medial and lateral contact points translated in posterior direction in extension and flexion as PTS increased. The maximum contact stress on the PF joint and quadriceps, and collateral ligament force decreased when the PTS increased. An implantation of the tibial plate with increased PTS reduced the PCL load. Physiologic insert movement led to an increasingly posterior position of the femur and reduced quadriceps force especially for knee flexion angles above high flexion (120°) when compared to TKA with a decreased slope of the tibial base plate.

CONCLUSION

An increase in the PTS increased medial and lateral movements without paradoxical motion. However, an excessive PTS indicated progressive loosening of the TF joint gap due to a reduction in collateral ligament tension during flexion.

Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Performance of All-Poly Tibial Freedom® Total Knee System for Treating Osteoarthritis Patients: Three-Year Follow Up Study

Introduction

Advancement in technology in terms of design and building materials has made Total Knee Replacement (TKR) a highly effective, safe, and predictable orthopedic procedure.

Aim

To review the clinical outcomes for efficacy and performance of Freedom Total Knee System for the management of Osteoarthritis (OA), at a minimum of three years follow up.

Materials and Methods

For this retrospective, post-marketing study, clinical data of patients treated with Freedom Total Knee System was retrieved from the clinical records after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee . All the patients above the age of 18 years who completed at least three years after TKR were observed for the study purpose. Patients treated for OA were included while the patients who received the implant for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and traumatic injury were excluded. Factors such as aseptic loosening, implant failure, and need for revision surgery were observed to evaluate implant performance. Cases were recruited for clinical assessment of primary efficacy endpoint in terms of post-surgery maximun range of motion. Secondary efficacy endpoint was to determine the clinical and social quality of life as per the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and stiffness scores.

Results

A total of 158 patients who had 191 TKR were observed for performance. The mean age of the patients was 67.67 years; mean BMI was 28.97±3.33, and the group comprised of 43% men and 57% women. Telephonic follow up at three years of 158 patients identified that none of them required revision surgery or had aseptic loosening suggesting excellent performance. Final clinical follow up at three years was available for only 35 patients (41 knee implants). The range of motion significantly improved from preoperative 104°±5.67° (range, 85°-119°) to 119.8°±11.05° (98°-123°) at follow-up (p<0.05). There was a significant improvement in clinical and functional AKSS score and WOMAC score at follow-up.

Conclusion

The evaluation of Freedom Total Knee System for TKR in treating OA, at a minimum of three years follow up showed excellent outcomes in terms of performance, range of motion, reduced postoperative stiffness and pain, and improved functionality.

Cruciate Retaining compared with Posterior Stabilised Nexgen total knee arthroplasty: results at 10 years in a matched cohort

INTRODUCTION Debate has persisted for many years about whether to sacrifice or replace the posterior cruciate ligament when performing total knee arthroplasty. A paucity of long-term follow-up studies comparing outcomes between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilised knees exist. We aimed to compare results at ten-year follow-up. METHODS A matched paired study comparing a cohort of 107 Zimmer Nexgen® Cruciate Retaining (CR) patients with a cohort of 107 Nexgen Posterior-Stabilised (PS) knees matched for age, sex, body mass index and preoperative American Knee Society score was undertaken. All patients underwent independent clinical assessment and knee society scoring preoperatively and at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years postoperatively. RESULTS Fifty-three patients (49.5%) in the CR group and 44 patients (41.1%) in the PS group were alive at 10-year follow-up. There were no significant differences between the CR and PS groups with regards to functional assessment (P = 0.95), overall range of movement (P = 0.46) or patient satisfaction (P = 1.0) at 10 years. However, there was a significantly better score improvement in range of movement in PS knees compared with CR knees (P = 0.027). There were six revisions (5.6%) in the PS group and 1 (0.93%) in the CR group (P = 0.12). Both CR and PS knees showed excellent survivorship with no significant difference at 10 years (P = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in functional score, overall range of motion or patient satisfaction between the Nexgen cruciate retaining and posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty at 10-year follow-up. However, PS knees had a greater score improvement in range of motion compared with CR knees.

Effect of tibial slope changes on femorotibial contact kinematics after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of tibial slope (TS) changes on the femorotibial articular contact kinematics in subjects undergoing posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CRTKA).

METHODS

Eighteen knees in nine patients with medial osteoarthritis who underwent CRTKA using the same size prosthesis were analysed preoperatively and 2 years after TKA. TS changes were calculated on lateral radiographs taken before and after TKA. Knees were classified into two groups according to the change in TS obtained by subtracting the post-operative value from the preoperative value: group 1 (>3°) and group 2 (<3°). The femorotibial articular contact kinematics of knees during weight-bearing flexion were compared between the two groups by two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration.

RESULTS

Group 1 showed a continuous posterior translation of the medial femoral condyle during the process of knee flexion, whereas in group 2 the medial femoral condyle experienced paradoxical anterior motion from 20° to 90° of knee flexion. The lateral femoral condyle continuously moved posteriorly in both groups.

CONCLUSION

A greater reduction in TS after TKA compared with preoperative TS reduces paradoxical medial femoral condylar movement. This may contribute to improved patient satisfaction after CR TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Customized versus Patient-Sized Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vivo Kinematics Study Using Mobile Fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

Historically, knee arthroplasties have been designed using average patient anatomy. Recent advances in imaging and manufacturing have facilitated the development of customized prostheses designed to fit the unique shape of individual patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if improving implant design through customized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves kinematic function.

METHODS

Using state-of-the-art mobile fluoroscopy, tibiofemoral kinematics were analyzed for 24 subjects with a customized individually made (CIM), cruciate-retaining TKA, and 14 subjects having an asymmetric condylar cruciate-retaining TKA. Subjects performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend and a rise from a seated position. Each patient was evaluated for weight-bearing range of motion, femorotibial translation, femorotibial axial rotation, and condylar liftoff occurrence.

RESULTS

Subjects having a CIM TKA experienced greater weight-bearing knee flexion compared with the traditional posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) TKA design. During flexion, the CIM TKA subjects consistently exhibited more posterior femoral rollback than the traditional PCR TKA subjects. The CIM TKA was found to have statistically greater axial rotation compared with the traditional PCR TKA (P = .05). Of note, only the CIM TKA patients experienced femoral internal rotation at full extension, as exhibited in a normal knee. Compared with the traditional PCR TKA, the CIM TKAs demonstrated minimal occurrences of paradoxical sliding and reverse rotation during flexion and extension. The CIM TKA subjects showed minimal liftoff and hence better stability in earlyflexion to midflexion compared with the traditional PCR subjects.

CONCLUSION

The CIM TKA demonstrated kinematics more similar to a normal knee. Therefore, using customized implant technology through CIM TKA designs affords benefits including more normal motion compared with a traditional PCR TKA.

Popliteus impingement after TKA may occur with well-sized prostheses

PURPOSE

To determine the mechanisms and extents of popliteus impingements before and after TKA and to investigate the influence of implant sizing. The hypotheses were that (1) popliteus impingements after TKA may occur at both the tibia and the femur, and (2) even with an apparently well-sized prosthesis, popliteal tracking during knee flexion is modified compared to the preoperative situation.

METHODS

The location of the popliteus in three cadaver knees was measured using computed tomography, before and after implantation of plastic TKA replicas, by injecting the tendon with radiopaque liquid. The pre- and post-operative positions of the popliteus were compared from full extension to deep flexion using normosized, oversized, and undersized implants (one size increments).

RESULTS

At the tibia, TKA caused the popliteus to translate posteriorly, mostly in full extension: 4.1 ± 2 mm for normosized implants, and 15.8 ± 3 mm with oversized implants, but no translations were observed when using undersized implants. At the femur, TKA caused the popliteus to translate laterally at deeper flexion angles, peaking between 80° and 120°: 2 ± 0.4 mm for normosized implants and 2.6 ± 0.5 mm with oversized implants. Three-dimensional analysis revealed prosthetic overhang at the posterosuperior corner of normosized and oversized femoral components (respectively, up to 2.9 mm and 6.6 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

A well-sized tibial component modifies popliteal tracking, while an undersized tibial component maintains more physiologic patterns. Oversizing shifts the popliteus considerably throughout the full arc of motion. This study suggests that both femoro- and tibio-popliteus impingements could play a role in residual pain and stiffness after TKA.

A soft-tissue preserving method for evaluating the impact of posterior tibial slope on kinematics during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A validation study

BACKGROUND

The reconstructed posterior tibial slope (PTS) plays a significant role in restoring knee kinematics in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. However, conventional methods for the investigation of PTS can be limited by sample size or prone to errors due to damages to the bone and/or soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to validate a novel method for the evaluation of the effects of PTS on knee kinematics.

METHODS

Seven computer-assisted cruciate-retaining TKAs were performed by two surgeons on healthy cadaveric knees. The implanted tibial baseplates allowed precise and easy modification of the PTS in situ. Knee kinematics were evaluated during passive full range of motion test. The evaluation was performed three times at each of the five PTSs in the order of 10°, seven degrees, four degrees, one degree, and back to ten degrees. The variability of the repeated measurements, inter-surgeon variation of the data, and test reproducibility were investigated.

RESULTS

The test method was shown to be highly repeatable (low root-mean-squared errors) and has low sensitivity to surgeon variability (ANOVA). No statistical difference was found in the knee kinematics between the first and last measurements at 10° PTS (paired t-test).

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that the developed method can be used to investigate the impact of PTS on knee kinematics without disrupting the soft-tissue environment of the knee. The use of the novel tibial baseplate allowed for adjusting the PTS without re-cutting the tibia and removing the components. The method may be applied to improve the future investigation of PTS.

Evaluation of the relationship of tibiofemoral kinematics before and after total knee replacement in an in vitro model of cranial cruciate deficiency in the dog

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between tibiofemoral kinematics before and after total knee replacement (TKR) in vitro.

ANIMALS

Eight canine hemipelves.

METHODS

A modified Oxford Knee Rig was used to place cadaveric limbs through a range of passive motion allowing the kinematics of the stifle to be evaluated. Four measurements were performed: a control stage, followed by a cranial cruciate transection stage, then following TKR with the musculature intact stage, and finally TKR with removal of limb musculature stage. Joint angles and translations of the femur relative to the tibia, including flexion-extension versus adduction-abduction, flexion-extension versus internal-external rotation, as well as flexion-extension versus each translation (cranial-caudal and lateral-medial) were calculated.

RESULTS

Significant differences were identified in kinematic data from limbs following TKR implantation as compared to the unaltered stifle. The TKR resulted in significant decreases in external rotation of the stifle during flexion-extension compared to the limb prior to any intervention, as well as increasing the abduction. The TKR significantly increased the caudal translation of the femur relative to the tibia compared to the unaltered limb. When compared with the cranial cruciate ligament-transection stage, TKR significantly decreased the ratio of the external rotation to flexion.

DISCUSSION

All three test periods showed significant differences from the unaltered stifle. The TKR did not completely restore the normal kinematics of the stifle.

Different intraoperative kinematics with comparable clinical outcomes of ultracongruent and posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

There remains no consensus as to whether mobile total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should use a posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing ultracongruent (UC) or a posterior cruciate ligament-substituting posterior stabilized (PS) prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to assess intraoperative kinematics and clinical outcomes of UC and PS rotating platform mobile-bearing TKA.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled study, mobile UC TKA prostheses (n = 45) were compared with mobile PS TKA prostheses (n = 45) with regard to intraoperative kinematics and clinical outcomes. The passive kinematic study using intraoperative navigation system included anterior/posterior translation, varus/valgus alignment and rotation of femur during flexion. The patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated over a 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Paradoxical anterior translation of the femur was 10.8 ± 5.2 mm in the UC knee from 0° to 82° of knee flexion and 8.7 ± 3.0 mm in the PS knee from 0° to 70° of knee flexion (p = 0.027). Paradoxical internal rotation of the femur was 5.8° in the UC knees and 9.9° in the PS knees (p = 0.003). But, there was no significant difference between the groups in regard to the coronal alignment. There was no significant difference in the range of motion, KS knee scores, KS function scores, and WOMAC index scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite different intraoperative kinematics between mobile UC and mobile PS TKA, neither design reproduced physiologic knee kinematics and there was no difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The clinical relevance of the study is that despite different intraoperative kinematics, UC design can be a considerable alternative to PS design in mobile-bearing TKA in respect of clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Women and Minorities Are at Risk of Developing Unexpected Reduction of Preoperative Flexion After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Reduced flexion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to the preoperative values can affect patient's activities of daily living and lead to patient dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to determine preoperative risk factors for developing a decrease in knee flexion after a primary TKA.

METHODS

We identified 37 knees diagnosed with osteoarthritis with a preoperative knee flexion ≥120° but a 12-month postoperative range of motion (ROM) ≤110°. A random sample of 111 patients (1:3) from the same database, whose knees had a preoperative and 12-month postoperative ROM ≥120°, based on a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis and no previous open knee surgery, were selected as the controls.

RESULTS

We found female gender, black ethnicity, and the low preoperative knee-specific Knee Society Score to be significant risk factors for developing a reduction of knee flexion after TKA with odds ratios of 3.48, 5.11, and 0.95, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of the well-recognized preoperative risk factors for a limited postoperative ROM, female patients, minorities, and those with lower knee-specific Knee Society Scores are at an increased risk of developing a decrease in flexion after an elective primary TKA.