Flexibility in administration of fondaparinux for prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgeries and Factor XIa Inhibitors

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), poses a significant risk during and after hospitalization, particularly for surgical patients. Among various patient groups, those undergoing major orthopedic surgeries are considered to have a higher susceptibility to PE and DVT. Major lower-extremity orthopedic procedures carry a higher risk of symptomatic VTE compared to most other surgeries, with an estimated incidence of ~4%. The greatest risk period occurs within the first 7-14 days following surgery. Major bleeding is also more prevalent in these surgeries compared to others, with rates estimated between 2% and 4%. For patients undergoing major lower-extremity orthopedic surgery who have a low bleeding risk, it is recommended to use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with or without mechanical devices. The choice of the initial agent depends on the specific surgery and patient comorbidities. First-line options include low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants, and aspirin. Second-line options consist of unfractionated heparin (UFH), fondaparinux, and warfarin. For most patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, the initial agents recommended for the early perioperative period are LMWHs (enoxaparin or dalteparin) or direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban or apixaban). In the case of hip fracture surgery, LMWH is recommended as the preferred agent for the entire duration of prophylaxis. However, emerging factor XI(a) inhibitors, as revealed by a recent meta-analysis, have shown a substantial decrease in the occurrence of VTE and bleeding events among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. This discovery poses a challenge to the existing paradigm of anticoagulant therapy in this specific patient population and indicates that factor XI(a) inhibitors hold great promise as a potential strategy to be taken into serious consideration.

Timing of Perioperative Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis Initiation and its Effect on Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative thromboprophylaxis guidelines offer conflicting recommendations on when to start thromboprophylaxis. As a result, there is considerable variation in clinical practice, which can lead to worse patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the start time of perioperative thromboprophylaxis with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were searched on October 23, 2020. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated VTE and/or bleeding among groups receiving the initial dose of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis at different times preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively were included. Only trials that randomized patients to the same medication among groups were eligible. Studies on any type of operation were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was used. The review was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42019142079). The outcomes of interest were VTE and bleeding. Prespecified subgroup analyses of studies including orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic operations were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 trials (n = 17,124 patients) met eligibility criteria. Pooled results showed a nonstatistically significant decrease in the rate of VTE with preoperative initiation of thromboprophylaxis compared with postoperative initiation (risk ratio 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.08; I² = 0%, n = 1,933). There was also a nonstatistically significant increase in the rate of bleeding with preoperative compared with postoperative initiation (risk ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.46; I² = 35%, n = 2,752). Risk of bias was moderate. Heterogeneity between studies was low (I² = 0% to 35%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found a nonstatistically significant decrease in the rate of VTE and an increase in the rate of bleeding when thromboprophylaxis was initiated preoperatively compared with postoperatively.

Do We Need Chemoprophylaxis to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism following Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy?

The aim of this study was to investigate the overall incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to assess the efficacy of chemoprophylaxis to prevent VTE following medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) in Asian patients. A total of 133 patients who consecutively underwent MOWHTO for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity were enrolled. All patients underwent preoperative ultrasonography and computed tomography venography on postoperative day 5 to detect deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients were divided into two groups: chemoprophylaxis group included patients (n = 66) who received 2.5 mg fondaparinux for 5 days postoperatively, whereas control group comprised patients (n = 67) who received placebo (67 patients). We evaluated the efficacy and safety outcomes of the treatment. We also assessed the predisposing factors that may affect the occurrence of VTE. The incidence of overall DVT was 14.9% in the control group and 10.6% in the chemoprophylaxis group (p > 0.05). Proximal DVT occurred in one patient in the control group. There was no symptomatic DVT or pulmonary embolism in either group. The patients with DVT had significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI) than the patients without DVT. Multivariate logistic regression showed BMI > 30 kg/m² that was significantly correlated with the development of DVT (odds ratio = 0.8; p = 0.017). There were no cases of major bleeding; however, minor bleeding episodes occurred in four patients in the chemoprophylaxis group. The current study showed that the overall incidence of VTE following MOWHTO was low in Asian patients even without chemoprophylaxis. Therefore, routine chemoprophylaxis following MOWHTO seems to be not necessary in a population with low-VTE incidence. However, selective chemoprophylaxis should be considered in patients with BMI > 30 kg/m².

Thromboprophylaxis across orthopaedic surgery: Bibliometric analysis of the most cited articles

PURPOSE

One of the most common adverse events after orthopaedic surgery, with a potential for subsequent serious morbidity and mortality is venous thromboembolism (VTE). Bibliometric analysis has been performed regarding many topics and across orthopaedics. As DVT prophylaxis is a major component of both orthopaedic surgery considerations and research, a bibliometric analysis in this area would prove beneficial in not only in understanding the research done in the field thus far, but would also direct future research efforts.

METHODS

The Web of Science (WoS) database from the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) was used to compile articles for bibliometric analysis using Boolean search: ((Orthopaedic∗ OR Orthopaedic∗) AND (thromboprophylaxis OR Thromboembolism OR Deep vein thrombosis OR thrombus OR embolism OR anticoagulation OR Embolus OR prophylaxis)).

RESULTS

The Top 100 cited articles included in the final list generated a total of 21,099 citations. The highest cited article was Prevention of venous thromboembolism by Geerts et al. published in Chest, which had a total of 2802 on WoS, and a calculated citation density of 215.54 of citations/years since publication. Comparing the overall citation against the year of publication there was a slight positive trend favoring more recent publications (R-value: 0.142; adjusted R-squared: 0.01; p = 0.16). Analysis of an articles Level of Evidence (LOE), 17 were grade with a level of I.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic thromboprophylaxis is an ever-changing field that is at the forefront of orthopaedic literature. The significant trend favoring high quality research within orthopaedic thromboprophylaxis demonstrates the importance of this topic and there was a need for a guide to best understand the evolution of DVT prophylaxis.

American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common source of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) intend to support decision making about preventing VTE in patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including performing systematic reviews. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 30 recommendations, including for major surgery in general (n = 8), orthopedic surgery (n = 7), major general surgery (n = 3), major neurosurgical procedures (n = 2), urological surgery (n = 4), cardiac surgery and major vascular surgery (n = 2), major trauma (n = 2), and major gynecological surgery (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing major surgery in general, the panel made conditional recommendations for mechanical prophylaxis over no prophylaxis, for pneumatic compression prophylaxis over graduated compression stockings, and against inferior vena cava filters. In patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty, conditional recommendations included using either aspirin or anticoagulants, as well as for a direct oral anticoagulant over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). For major general surgery, the panel suggested pharmacological prophylaxis over no prophylaxis, using LMWH or unfractionated heparin. For major neurosurgery, transurethral resection of the prostate, or radical prostatectomy, the panel suggested against pharmacological prophylaxis. For major trauma surgery or major gynecological surgery, the panel suggested pharmacological prophylaxis over no prophylaxis.

Pneumatic compression device does not show effective thromboprophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty in a low incidence population

INTRODUCTION

Purpose of this study was to assess whether the intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) device would be an effective prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a low incidence population.

HYPOTHESIS

The mechanical thromboprophylaxis could reduce the incidence of DVT compared to non-prophylaxis group and would have similar efficacy as the chemoprophylaxis following TKA in a low DVT incidence population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2009 to June 2016, 1259 elective primary TKA with preoperative diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis in a single institute were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups: those who were managed with chemoprophylaxis (CPX group, 414 cases), with mechanical prophylaxis (IPC group, 425 cases), or without pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis (control group, 420 cases). All patients underwent preoperative ultrasonography and computed tomographic venography on postoperative day 6 to assess development of DVT. The incidence of overall, proximal, symptomatic DVT and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) were compared among the groups. Major and minor bleeding complications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The incidence of overall DVT was 14.8% in control group, 6.3% in CPX group and 11.3% in IPC group respectively and CPX group showed significantly lower incidence than other two groups (p<0.001). The incidence of proximal DVT was 1.9% in control group, 0.7% in CPX group and 0.9% in IPC group respectively (p>0.05). The incidence of symptomatic DVT was 0.7% in control group, 0% in CPX group and 0.7% in IPC group respectively (p>0.05). There was no case of symptomatic PE diagnosed during hospital stay in all patients.

DISCUSSION

Single use of IPC device could not reach significant level of DVT prophylaxis compared to control group and only chemoprophylaxis showed significantly reduce the incidence of overall DVT following TKA. Single use of IPC device does not show effective thromboprophylaxis in a low DVT incidence population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case control study.

Incidence and risk factors of major bleeding following major orthopaedic surgery with fondaparinux thromboprophylaxis. A time-to-event analysis

AIMS

Increased exposure to fondaparinux, as observed in patients with renal impairment, may increase bleeding risk. This study aims to determine the time course of major bleeding after major orthopaedic surgery, identify predictors of bleeding and simulate the effect of a reduced dose of fondaparinux on bleeding for patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance = 20-50 ml min^-1 ).

METHODS

Data including fondaparinux anti-Xa activities from two multicentre prospective cohorts were used. In the first cohort, patients (n = 957) received fondaparinux 2.5 mg once a day. In the second, patients with moderate renal impairment (n = 436) received 1.5 mg once per day. The time-to-major bleeding after the end of surgery was modelled using a parametric survival analysis in NONMEM.

RESULTS

The observed rate of major bleeding up to day 11 was 5.2%. The time-to-event analysis indicated that the hazard of bleeding was highest in the first days following surgery and then remained low thereafter. Independent significant predictors of an increased hazard of major bleeding were male sex, lower body weight and increased drug exposure. Simulated rates of major bleeding up to day 11 in patients with moderate renal impairment were 6.5% with fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily and 3.8% with fondaparinux 1.5 mg once daily.

CONCLUSION

The hazard of major bleeding is highest in the first postoperative days and increases with fondaparinux exposure. To reduce the risk of bleeding in patients with moderate renal impairment, this study supports the use of a lower dose of fondaparinux 1.5 mg once daily.

Persistent Pulmonary Embolism Rates Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Even With Prophylactic Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), a significant and life-threatening complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), has been described as a "never event." Despite a number of advancements in care, PE continues to occur following TKA. This study evaluates symptomatic PE rates over time in TKA patients enrolled in multicenter randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify clinical trials assessing prophylactic anticoagulation in patients undergoing TKA between January 1995 and December 2016. A random effect model was used to combine PE rates across studies. The pooled proportion of symptomatic PEs was calculated and heterogeneity was quantified with the I² statistic. A 95% prediction interval was constructed to examine what the expected range in the proportion of symptomatic PEs would be in future studies. Meta-regression was used to explore the effect of time on the rate of symptomatic PEs.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies representing 27,073 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The symptomatic PE rate was 0.37% (95% confidence interval, 0.24%-0.52%). There was significant heterogeneity across studies, I² = 66%. Between 1996 and 2010, the proportion of PEs did not change in the regression analysis. The 95% prediction interval was 0.0002 to 0.0106, indicating that in similar future studies, the true proportion of symptomatic PEs would range from 0.02% to 1.06%.

CONCLUSION

Over a 14-year period, the symptomatic PE rate after TKA was relatively constant even when patients received potent anticoagulation. These results suggest that some patients may have a genetic predisposition to develop a PE and more effective risk stratification protocols need to be developed to make sure patients receive appropriate anticoagulation.

Venous thromboembolism prevention with fondaparinux 1.5 mg in renally impaired patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery

Despite the need for effective and safe thromboprophylactic drugs for patients with renal impairment, clinical trial data on anticoagulant agents are limited in this population. The study aim was to assess in the real-world setting the use of the once-daily 1.5 mg reduced dosage regimen of fondaparinux available for this context. In this prospective cohort study, patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 20–50 ml/ minute, undergoing total hip (THR) or knee (TKR) replacement or hip fracture surgery (HFS) received fondaparinux thromboprophylaxis. Main clinical outcomes were bleeding (major/clinically relevant nonmajor), symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and death. Overall, 442 patients (353 women; median age: 82 years; 39.4% in ASA class ≥3; mean ± SD CrCl: 39.0 ± 8.0 ml/minute; 78% with additional risk factors for bleeding), undergoing THR (43.7%), TKR (27.6%), or HFS (28.7%) received fondaparinux 1.5 mg for a mean ± SD duration of 16.0 ± 12.5 days. At postoperative day 10, the rates (95% confidence interval) of major bleeding, clinically relevant bleeding and symptomatic VTE were 4.5% (2.8–6.9), 0.5% (0.1–1.6) and 0.5% (0.05–1.62), respectively; no fatal bleeding, bleeding into a critical organ, pulmonary embolism or proximal deep-vein thrombosis occurred. Corresponding rates at one month were 5.2%, 0.7% and 0.7%. One-month mortality was 2.3% (0.9–3.6). This large clinical prospective study provides for the first time, under conditions reflecting “real-world” routine clinical practice, data on the bleeding and VTE risks of thromboprophylaxis with fondaparinux 1.5 mg after major orthopaedic surgery in renally impaired patients. It shows that these patients constitute a very elderly and fragile population.

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00555438

Pulmonary Embolism Rates Following Total Hip Arthroplasty With Prophylactic Anticoagulation: Some Pulmonary Emboli Cannot Be Avoided

BACKGROUND

A symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) after total joint arthroplasty has been described as a "never event." Despite potent anticoagulants and improvements in patient care, PE continues to occur following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study evaluates symptomatic PE rates over time in THA patients enrolled in multicenter randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify clinical trials assessing prophylactic anticoagulation in patients undergoing THA between January 1995 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria consisted of RCTs evaluating prophylactic anticoagulation in patients undergoing THA. A random effect model was used to combine PE rates across studies.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies (34,764 patients) were included. Patients were administered low molecular weight heparin (13,590 patients), oral factor Xa inhibitors (6609 patients), oral direct thrombin inhibitors (5965 patients), indirect factors Xa/IIa inhibitors (3444 patients), aspirin (2427 patients), and warfarin (489 patients). Mobile compression was used in 199 patients, and placebo was used in 2041 patients. Across all included studies, the estimated PE rate was 0.21% (95% confidence interval: 0.13%, 0.32%). Between 1997 and 2013, the proportion of PEs did not change in regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although the PE rate was low, it was consistent throughout the 17 years spanning these RCTs, which excluded patients with significant morbidity. These results suggest that even healthy THA patients receiving aggressive anticoagulation still have a risk for PE, and the "never event" designation requires reassessment.

Choosing the Appropriate Antithrombotic Agent for the Prevention and Treatment of VTE: A Case-Based Approach

Objective:

To review the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in various patient populations and evaluate the agents available for the prevention and treatment of VTE using a case-based approach.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search (1995–July 2006) was conducted to identify relevant literature. Additional references were reviewed from selected articles.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Articles related to the prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and medically ill patients, as well as the treatment of VTE, were reviewed.

Data Synthesis:

Pharmacologic options for the prevention and treatment of VTE include warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), and fondaparinux. Current guidelines support the use of warfarin, LMWH, or fondaparinux for VTE prophylaxis following lower limb major orthopedic surgery. For VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients or patients undergoing general surgery, use of UFH and LMWH is supported; however, recent data on fondaparinux suggest that it is also effective in these patient populations. The use of UFH or LMWH (both in conjunction with warfarin) for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis or nonmassive pulmonary embolism is recommended. Recent data suggest that fondaparinux (in conjunction with warfarin) is also effective for the treatment of VTE. A variety of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacoeconomic factors differentiate each agent for the various indications.

Conclusions:

Currently, a “one-size-fits-all” anticoagulant is not available for treatment of VTE. A variety of patient factors, including type of surgery, medical indication, thrombotic risk factors, bleeding risk, history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and a variety of comorbid conditions can affect the safety, efficacy, and selection of appropriate VTE therapy.

Pentasaccharides for the prevention of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition with potentially serious and life-threatening consequences. The standard method of thromboprophylaxis uses an anticoagulant such as low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin. In recent years, another type of anticoagulant, pentasaccharide, an indirect factor Xa inhibitor, has shown good anticoagulative effect in clinical trials. Three types of pentasaccharides are available: short-acting fondaparinux, long-acting idraparinux and idrabiotaparinux. Pentasaccharides cause little heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and are better tolerated than unfractionated heparin, LMWH and warfarin. However, no consensus has been reached on whether pentasaccharides are superior or inferior to other anticoagulative methods.

OBJECTIVES

To assess effects of pentasaccharides versus other methods of thromboembolic prevention (thromboprophylaxis) in people who require anticoagulant treatment to prevent venous thromboembolism.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Specialised Register (last searched March 2016) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 2). The CIS searched trial databases for details of ongoing and unpublished studies. Review authors searched LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences) and the reference lists of relevant studies and reviews identified by electronic searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials on any type of pentasaccharide versus other anticoagulation methods (pharmaceutical or mechanical) for VTE prevention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed methodological quality and extracted data in predesigned tables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included in this review 25 studies with a total of 21,004 participants. All investigated fondaparinux for VTE prevention; none investigated idraparinux or idrabiotaparinux. Studies included participants undergoing abdominal surgery, thoracic surgery, bariatric surgery or coronary bypass surgery; acutely ill hospitalised medical patients; people requiring rigid or semirigid immobilisation; and those with superficial venous thrombosis. Most studies focused on orthopaedic patients. We lowered the quality of the evidence because of heterogeneity between studies and a small number of events causing imprecision.When comparing fondaparinux with placebo, we found less total VTE (risk ratio (RR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.38; 5717 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 64%; P < 0.00001), less symptomatic VTE (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.36; 6503 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001), less total DVT (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.40; 5715 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 67%; P < 0.00001), less proximal DVT (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.39; 2746 participants; 7 studies; I2 = 64%; P = 0.0004) and less total pulmonary embolism (PE) (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.62; 6412 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 0%; P = 0.008) in the fondaparinux group. The quality of the evidence was moderate for total VTE, total DVT and proximal DVT, and high for symptomatic VTE and total PE.When fondaparinux was compared with LMWH, analyses indicated that fondaparinux reduced total VTE and DVT (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; 9339 participants; 11 studies; I2 = 64%; P < 0.0001; and RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.71; 9356 participants; 10 studies; I2 = 67%; P < 0.0001, respectively), and showed a trend toward reduced proximal DVT (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.02; 8361 participants; 9 studies; I2 = 53%; P = 0.06). Symptomatic VTE (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.63; 12240 participants; 9 studies; I2 = 35%; P = 0.90) and total PE (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.34; 12350 participants; 10 studies; I2 = 0%; P = 0.51) indicated no difference between fondaparinux and LMWH. The quality of the evidence was moderate for total VTE, symptomatic VTE, total DVT and total PE, and low for proximal DVT.We showed that fondaparinux increased major bleeding compared with both placebo and LWMH (RR 2.56, 95% CI 1.48 to 4.44; 6659 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 0%; P = 0.0008; moderate-quality evidence; and RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.75; 12,501 participants; 11 studies; I2 = 24%; P = 0.008; high-quality evidence, respectively). All-cause mortality was not different between fondaparinux and placebo or LMWH (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.22; 6674 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 14%; P = 0.26; moderate-quality evidence; and RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.22; 12,400 participants; 11 studies; I2 = 0%; P = 0.44; moderate-quality evidence, respectively).One study compared fondaparinux with variable and fixed (1 mg per day) doses of warfarin after elective hip or knee replacement surgery and showed no difference in primary and secondary outcomes between fondaparinux and both variable and fixed doses of warfarin. The quality of the evidence was very low. One small study compared fondaparinux with edoxaban in patients with severe renal impairment undergoing lower-limb orthopaedic surgery and reported no thromboembolic events, major bleeding events or deaths in either group. The quality of the evidence was very low. One small study compared fondaparinux with mechanical thromboprophylaxis. Results showed no difference in total VTE and total DVT between fondaparinux and mechanical thromboprophylaxis. This study reported no cases pertaining to the other outcomes of this review. The quality of the evidence was low.There were insufficient studies to permit meaningful conclusions for subgroups of clinical conditions other than orthopaedic surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate to high quality evidence shows that fondaparinux is effective for short-term prevention of VTE when compared with placebo. It can reduce total VTE, DVT, total PE and symptomatic VTE, and does not demonstrate a reduction in deaths compared with placebo. Low to moderate quality evidence shows that fondaparinux is more effective for short-term VTE prevention when compared with LMWH. It can reduce total VTE and total DVT and does not demonstrate a reduction in deaths when compared with LMWH. However, at the same time, moderate to high quality evidence shows that fondaparinux increases major bleeding when compared with placebo and LMWH. Therefore, when fondaparinux is chosen for the prevention of VTE, attention should be paid to the person's bleeding and thrombosis risks. Most data were derived from patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Therefore, the conclusion predominantly pertains to these patients. Data on fondaparinux for other clinical conditions are sparse.

The Use of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Postoperative Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to carry out an up-to-date evaluation on the use of compression devices as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis methods in orthopedic and neurological patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is an increased risk of DVT with surgery, particularly in patients who are not expected to mobilize soon after their procedures, such as orthopedic and neurosurgical patients. Compression devices are often employed for DVT prophylaxis in these patients. However, the true efficacy of these devices and the standardization of use with these devices are yet to be established.

METHODS

Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane library electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting on the use of compression devices for DVT prevention.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included for review and meta-analysis. Use of an intermittent pneumatic compression device alone is neither superior nor inferior to chemoprophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of large randomized multicenter trials comparing the use of intermittent pneumatic compression or chemoprophylaxis alone to a combination of both treatments, the current evidence supports the use of a combined approach in high-risk surgical patients.

Timing the First Postoperative Dose of Anticoagulants: Lessons Learned From Clinical Trials

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, have been shown in phase 3 trials to be effective for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty. Results from prior studies suggested that the safety of anticoagulants in such patients was improved if the first postoperative dose was delayed for at least 6 h after surgery. The timing of the first postoperative dose of the NOACs tested in phase 2 studies differed among the three NOACs: dabigatran was started 1 to 4 h postoperatively, whereas rivaroxaban and apixaban were started at least 6 and 12 h, postoperatively, respectively. Our review of the timing of initiation of thromboprophylaxis in randomized trials provides three related lessons. First, clinical trials performed before the NOACs were evaluated demonstrated that delaying the first dose of prophylactic anticoagulation until after major surgery is effective and safe. Second, the optimal timing of the first dose of prophylactic anticoagulation after surgery depends on the dose that is selected. Third, the results of the phase 3 trials with NOACs for thromboprophylaxis support the concept that acceptable efficacy and safety can be achieved when the appropriate first postoperative dose of anticoagulant is delayed for at least 6 h after surgery.

Prevalence of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Treated with Mechanical Compression Device After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Asian Patients

The purpose of this study was: (1) to determine the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after the use of a mechanical compression device only, without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis; (2) to investigate the factors associated with DVT; and (3) to investigate the natural course of DVT and PE. We reviewed consecutive series of 874 patients (1434 knees) who received treatment with a mechanical compression device only for prevention of DVT after primary TKA. The prevalence of DVT was 6.6% (94 of 1434 knees). Proximal thrombi were found in 6 of 1434 knees (0.4%). No patient had PE on perfusion lung scans. Further sonograms and venograms for the patients with thrombi at 6 months after the operation revealed that all thrombi were resolved.

Prevalence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism treated with mechanical compression device after total hip arthroplasty

Several reports have suggested that there is a strikingly low prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Asian patients. We determined the prevalence of DVT and PE after the use of a mechanical compression device only without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in 459 patients (516 hips). The overall prevalence of DVT was 4.8% (27 of 561 hips). Nine of 27 hips had proximal thrombi. Three patients (0.7%) had asymptomatic PE. In our patients, combinations of absent thrombophilic polymorphisms with low clinical prothrombotic risk factors led to a low prevalence of DVT and virtually no symptomatic PE. Therefore, mechanical compression device only suffices to prevent DVT and PE in Asian patients.

Venous thromboembolism after total joint arthroplasty: results from a Japanese multicenter cohort study

Introduction

Real-world evidence of the effectiveness of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is limited. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylactic regimens in Japanese patients undergoing joint replacement in a real-world setting.

Method

Overall, 1,294 patients (1,073 females and 221 males) who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 868 patients (740 females and 128 males) who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 34 Japanese national hospital organization (NHO) hospitals were enrolled. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detected by mandatory bilateral ultrasonography up to post-operative day (POD) 10 and pulmonary embolism (PE) up to POD28. The main safety outcomes were bleeding (major or minor) and death from any cause up to POD28.

Results

Patients undergoing TKA (n = 1,294) received fondaparinux (n = 360), enoxaparin (n = 223), unfractionated heparin (n = 72), anti-platelet agents (n = 45), or no medication (n = 594). Patients undergoing THA (n = 868) received fondaparinux (n = 261), enoxaparin (n = 148), unfractionated heparin (n = 32), anti-platelet agents (n = 44), or no medication (n = 383). The incidence rates of sonographically diagnosed DVTs up to POD10 were 24.3% in patients undergoing TKA and 12.6% in patients undergoing THA, and the incidence rates of major bleeding up to POD28 were 1.2% and 2.3%, respectively. Neither fatal bleeding nor fatal pulmonary embolism occurred. Significant risk factors for postoperative VTE identified by multivariate analysis included gender (female) in both TKA and THA groups and use of a foot pump in the TKA group. Only prophylaxis with fondaparinux reduced the occurrence of VTE significantly in both groups. Propensity score matching analysis (fondaparinux versus enoxaparin) showed that the incidence of DVT was lower (relative risk 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 0.85, P = 0.002 in TKA and relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99, P = 0.134 in THA) but that the incidence of major bleeding was higher in the fondaparinux than in the enoxaparin group (3.4% versus 0.5%, P = 0.062 in TKA and 4.9% versus 0%, P = 0.022 in THA).

Conclusions

These findings indicate that prophylaxis with fondaparinux, not enoxaparin, reduces the risk of DVT but increases bleeding tendency in patients undergoing TKA and THA.

Trial registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000001366. Registered 11 September 2008.

A mobile compression device for thrombosis prevention in hip and knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolic events, either deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, are important complications in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile compression device (ActiveCare+S.F.T.) with or without aspirin compared with current pharmacological protocols for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective primary unilateral arthroplasty of a lower-extremity joint.

METHODS

A multicenter registry was established to capture the rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolic events following primary knee arthroplasty (1551 patients) or hip arthroplasty (1509 patients) from ten sites. All patients were eighteen years of age or older with no known history of venous thromboembolism, coagulation disorder, or solid tumor. Use of the compression device began perioperatively and continued for a minimum of ten days. Patients with symptoms of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism underwent duplex ultrasonography and/or spiral computed tomography. All patients were evaluated at three months postoperatively to document any evidence of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

Of 3060 patients, twenty-eight (0.92%) had venous thromboembolism (twenty distal deep venous thrombi, three proximal deep venous thrombi, and five pulmonary emboli). One death occurred, with no autopsy performed. Symptomatic venous thromboembolic rates observed in patients who had an arthroplasty of a lower-extremity joint using the mobile compression device were noninferior (not worse than), at a margin of 1.0%, to the rates reported for pharmacological prophylaxis, including warfarin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, except in the knee arthroplasty group, in which the mobile compression device fell short of the rate reported for rivaroxaban by 0.06%.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the mobile compression device with or without aspirin for patients undergoing arthroplasty of a lower-extremity joint provides a noninferior risk for the development of venous thromboembolism compared with current pharmacological protocols.

New oral therapies for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism

PURPOSE

Data comparing traditional and novel anticoagulants are reviewed, and the potential use of new oral agents for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is assessed.

SUMMARY

Practical challenges in using traditional anticoagulants are well established and have led to the search for new oral agents. Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran etexilate are new oral anticoagulants that may offer simpler, more effective, and safer treatment and prevention of VTE, which may increase adherence to such therapy, improve outcomes, and decrease overall health care costs. Their immediate onset of anticoagulant effect, ease of oral administration, and lack of needed regular anticoagulation monitoring are of interest in the medical and pharmacy communities. However, in the treatment and prevention of VTE, more data will be needed to determine their ultimate place in therapy. This review is intended to provide pharmacists with an objective overview of practical considerations that can help them understand the clinical data to facilitate their selection of anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran etexilate are new oral agents for the prevention and treatment of VTE.

[The new guidelines for deep venous thromboembolic disease prophylaxis in elective hip and knee replacement surgery. Are we nearer or further away from a consensus?]

Venous thromboembolism events (VTE) prophylaxis after elective hip or knee replacement surgery is a subject of controversy. Three sets of guidelines (NICE, ACCP and AAOS) on this topic have recently been updated. The guidelines have points in common: prophylaxis is necessary, it is recommended to combine mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis in patients who have suffered a previous VTE, isolated mechanical measures and low molecular weight heparins are effective, the new oral anticoagulants and fondaparinux are effective drugs. There is some consensus in recommending regional anaesthesia, in advising against echography studies in asymptomatic patients, and in the promotion of early mobilisation of the patient. There is controversy over the most suitable pharmacological treatment and the time of starting, and the duration of this, as well as on vena cava filters, antiplatelet drugs, and VTE or bleeding risk factors.

Is routine chemoprophylaxis necessary for prevention of venous thromboembolism following knee arthroplasty in a low incidence population?

BACKGROUND

Standard thromboprophylaxis guidelines have not been applied universally in regions with low incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) considering risks of chemoprophylaxis and low incidence itself. We evaluated the prevalence of DVT, efficacy and safety of chemoprophylaxis, and necessity of pharmacological prevention in a low DVT incidence population.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-eight patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were prospectively randomized to receive either a placebo or 2.5 mg of fondaparinux once daily for 5 days. Doppler ultrasonography was performed preoperatively and 7 days after surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was prevalence of DVT up to day 7. Secondary efficacy outcome was prevalence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) up to day 90. Primary and secondary safety outcomes were incidence of major and minor bleeding, respectively.

RESULTS

The prevalence of total DVT was 25.7 % in placebo group and 6.8 % in fondaparinux group (p = 0.002) and the prevalence of proximal DVT was lower in both groups with no statistical difference. There was no symptomatic VTE in either group up to day 90. Although no major bleeding was developed, fondaparinux group had a significant increase of minor bleeding events (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There remains low incidence of VTE following TKA in East Asians even without chemoprophylaxis. Although short-term fondaparinux protocol could reduce the incidence of overall DVT, its routine use seems debatable due to extremely rare proximal DVT and symptomatic PE and drug-related bleeding complication. However, modified and selective use of chemoprophylaxis would be considerable in high risk patients.

Conflict of interest in the assessment of thromboprophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The choice of modalities for thromboprophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty is controversial. To address this issue, an evidence-based review of previous studies was performed. The characteristics of the studies selected for review can affect the final conclusion of an evidence-based review. One such characteristic, financial conflict of interest related to medical research, is a widespread concern. The purpose of the present study was to determine what proportion of studies on thromboprophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty were sponsored by industry and whether the assessments of thromboprophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty were associated with industry support.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for prospective, original, English-language studies, published from 2004 to 2010, on thromboprophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty. The funding sources of the articles were reviewed, and qualitative conclusions regarding the modality of interest for thromboprophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty were classified as being favorable, neutral, or unfavorable.

RESULTS

Seventy-one eligible articles were identified; fifty-two were funded by industry, and fourteen were not. The other five studies did not include information about the funding source. A significant association was observed between the funding source and qualitative conclusions (p = 0.033). Only two (3.8%) of the fifty-two industry-sponsored studies had unfavorable conclusions, whereas three (21.4%) of the fourteen non-industry-sponsored studies indicated that, depending on the clinical scenario, the modality examined was neither effective nor safe.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies on thromboprophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty are sponsored by industry. Moreover, the qualitative conclusions in those studies are favorable to the use of the sponsored prophylactic agent.

Fondaparinux - data on efficacy and safety in special situations

New anticoagulants promise to have better efficacy, more safety and/or a better manageability than traditional anticoagulants. However, knowledge is limited regarding special situations such as renal insufficiency, obesity, pregnancy, long-term therapy, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, treatment in patients with mechanical heart valves, use for children, and in patients with a high risk of thromboembolic complications. These situations have rarely or even never been the objective of randomised controlled trials. The purpose of the present article is to summarize and discuss available data on efficacy and safety in these special situations for one of the first new anticoagulants, the indirect factor-Xa inhibitor fondaparinux. Furthermore, we discuss safety in licensed indications and management of bleeding complications and comment on measuring of drug concentration in plasma.

Application, tolerance and safety of fondaparinux therapy in a German hospital: a prospective single-centre experience

INTRODUCTION

The pentasaccharide fondaparinux is widely approved for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases and therapy of acute coronary syndrome. It is also used off-label in patients with acute, suspected or antecedent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The aim of this prospective observational cohort study was to document fondaparinux' prescription practice, tolerance and therapy safety in a representative mixed German single-centre patient cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 09/2008 - 04/2009, 231 consecutive patients treated with fondaparinux were enrolled. Medical data were obtained from patient's records. The patients were clinically screened for thrombosis (Wells score), sequelae of HIT (4T's score), and bleeding complications (ISTH-criteria) and subjected to further assessment (i.e. sonography, HIT-diagnostics), if necessary. The mortality rate was assessed 30 days after therapy start.

RESULTS

Overall, 153/231 patients had a prophylactic, 74/231 patients a therapeutic, and 4/231 patients a successive prophylactic/therapeutic indication. In 11/231 patients fondaparinux was used due to suspected/antecedent HIT, in 5/231 patients due to a previous cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity to heparins. Other indications were rare. Three new/progressive thromboses were detected. No cases of HIT, major bleedings, or fatalities occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Fondaparinux was well tolerated and was safe in prophylaxis and therapy; prescriptions mostly followed the current approval guidelines and were rarely related to HIT-associated indications (<5% of prescriptions), which is in contrast to previous study results in the U.S. (>94% of prescriptions were HIT-associated). A trend towards an individualised fondaparinux use based on the compound's inherent properties and the patients' risk profiles, i.e., antecedent HIT, bone fractures, heparin allergy, was observed.

[Recommendations for the administration of conventional and new antithrombotic agents from the perspective of anesthesiology]

Neuraxial blockade confers benefits to surgical patients not only due to the high analgesic quality but also through a reduction in postoperative complications, such as respiratory insufficiency and a shortening of postoperative paralytic ileus. In orthopedic surgery peripheral and neuraxial blockades are extensively used to enhance postoperative mobilization. The most serious complication of neuraxial blockade is spinal epidural hematoma, which may lead to permanent paraplegia if left untreated. The risk is enhanced in patients receiving thromboembolism prophylaxis. Most national societies have issued guidelines with specific time intervals between application of antithrombotic drugs and subsequent neuraxial blockade to minimize this risk. From the viewpoint of an anesthesiologist it is preferable to start with chemical thromboembolism prophylaxis postoperatively as opposed to preoperatively, to administer all drugs in the evening and to limit the number of available drugs at each site. The safety of neuraxial blockade in the presence of the new oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban is currently unknown due to limited experience and dabigatran is considered contraindicated with indwelling epidural catheters according to the manufacturer.

Italian intersociety consensus statement on antithrombotic prophylaxis in hip and knee replacement and in femoral neck fracture surgery

Anticoagulant prophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a worldwide established procedure in hip and knee replacement surgery, as well as in the treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNF). Different guidelines are available in the literature, with quite different recommendations. None of them is a multidisciplinary effort as the one presented. The Italian Society for Studies on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET), the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT), the association of Orthopaedists and Traumatologists of Italian Hospitals (OTODI), together with the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) have set down easy and quick suggestions for VTE prophylaxis in hip and knee surgery as well as in FNF treatment. This inter-society consensus statement aims at simplifying the grading system reported in the literature, and its goal is to benefit its clinical application. Special focus is given to fragile patients, those with high bleeding risk, and those receiving chronic antiplatelet (APT) and vitamin K antagonists treatment. A special chapter is dedicated to regional anaesthesia and VTE prophylaxis.

[Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in adults]

According to the concept of Virchow, alterations of the blood flow, vascular injury and hypercoagulability of the blood (due to inherited or acquired thrombophilia or as a consequence of perioperative coagulation activation) are causally related to the risk of venous thrombosis. The overall risk of venous thromboembolic events in the perioperative setting ranges between <10% and >50%. The risk is highest in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery or cancer surgery. The aim of perioperative thrombosis prophylaxis is to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. The article discusses patient- and intervention-dependent thromboprophylactic measures. Recent recommendations for non-pharmacological and pharmacological prophylaxis are presented including the information on the beginning and duration of anticoagulation. Management strategies for patients undergoing abdominal and orthopaedic surgery as well as special aspects of the neurosurgical population and of cancer surgery are highlighted.

New versus established drugs in venous thromboprophylaxis: efficacy and safety considerations related to timing of administration

European surgeons generally administer thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) at high doses 12 hours preoperatively in response to findings that surgery-related deep-vein thrombosis typically originates at the time of major orthopedic surgery or shortly afterwards. North American surgeons, in contrast, generally administer LMWHs at an almost 50% higher dose than that given in Europe 12-24 hours postoperatively, even though both pre- and postoperative administration are considered suitable in current guidelines. This review therefore examines how close to major orthopedic surgery thromboprophylaxis is administered, and the subsequent effect of timing on clinically relevant efficacy and safety parameters. The trials examined involve fondaparinux sodium (fondaparinux) and (xi)melagatran, in comparison with the established LMWHs enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) and dalteparin. In key trials, fondaparinux reduced the risk of asymptomatic and clinical venous thromboembolism (VTE) by 55% compared with enoxaparin, at the expense of a 1.6-fold higher risk of bleeding. While the studies were not designed to compare efficacy endpoints based on clinical outcomes, no significant difference was demonstrated for symptomatic VTE. The fact that the enoxaparin regimen was started at the upper limits of its recommended initiation timeframe may have significantly influenced the results of comparative studies, given that several meta-analyses found that the timing of LMWH initiation significantly influenced its effectiveness on asymptomatic VTE and major bleedings. Compared with once-daily LMWH in European trials, early postoperative doses/regimens of twice-daily (xi)melagatran did not increase severe bleeding and was significantly less effective at preventing asymptomatic total VTE in patients who had undergone total hip-replacement surgery. When used according to the 'knife-to-skin' protocol, the melagatran regimen was superior to enoxaparin in preventing major asymptomatic VTE, but at the cost of a higher rate of major bleeding. In North America, the delayed postoperative administration of (xi)melagatran (oral only) was less effective than the postoperative twice-daily enoxaparin regimen with regard to asymptomatic total and major VTE. Our analysis highlights the fact that differences in efficacy and safety data in clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis might also be linked to differences in the timing of initiation. However, it is not possible to assess the importance of this 'time effect' among other factors considered as drug-specific properties (pharmacokinetics, mode of action, dosage) and evaluate their respective contribution in the observed differences. To avoid unbiased comparison in further studies, the possible effect of timing should be taken into account and, when feasible, both therapies started at the same time. For instance, harmonizing the initiation of thromboprophylaxis 6-8 or 12 hours postoperatively could be two acceptable harmonized options for scheduling in clinical trials.

The benefit of aspirin chemoprophylaxis for thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty

The threat of thromboembolic events after total knee arthroplasty has been substantially reduced during the past decade. Currently, the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism is approximately 0.1%. This is due to a confluence of changes in our medical practices, including early mobilization, less traumatic surgery, increased use of regional anesthesia, pneumatic compression devices, and chemoprophylactic agents. Because many chemoprophylactic agents are associated with an increased risk of bleeding, we have chosen aspirin as our preferred method of chemoprophylaxis. This study seeks to determine if aspirin is as effective as newer chemoprophylactic agents as judged by the prevalence of fatal or nonfatal pulmonary embolus, readmission for deep venous thrombosis, and risk of bleeding. Aspirin was the principle chemoprophylactic agent for 3473 consecutive patients having total knee arthroplasty. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks. There were nine deaths: two from pulmonary embolism, five cardiac events, one stroke, and one fat embolism. Three cardiac-related deaths occurred in patients for whom pulmonary embolism could not definitively be ruled out. Therefore, the best case and worst case scenarios for fatal pulmonary embolism were 0.06% and 0.14%, respectively. Thirteen patients underwent reoperation for hematoma (0.4%). Therefore, we have demonstrated aspirin combined with early mobilization, regional anesthesia, foot pumps, and improved surgical techniques is safer than and equally efficacious as other chemoprophylaxis agents.

Rationale for low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty

Low-molecular-weight heparin has been studied extensively in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and provides highly effective and safe prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Low-molecular-weight heparin received the highest rating (A1) in the American College of Chest Physicians recommendations for DVT prophylaxis after elective TKA. Prevalence of DVT with low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis was 33% in TKA data pooled from six randomized studies, with a proximal DVT rate of 7.1%. A metaanalysis reported a 2.4% rate of major bleeding with low-molecular-weight heparin. Low-molecular-weight heparin, given by subcutaneous injection, can be started before surgery or after surgery. A synthetic pentasaccharide (fondaparinux), which received an A1 rating in the American College of Chest Physicians recommendations, also is available. As with all treatments, the benefit must be considered against the risk when using these anticoagulants.