Weighted versus uniform dose of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing primary, elective knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Can local infiltration analgesia supplemented with tranexamic acid reduce blood loss during total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of TXA supplemented with local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for reducing blood loss in patients undergoing total knee replacement.

MATERIALS

A retrospective study of 530 individuals with a mean age of 71.44 years was performed after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Patients were divided into three groups according to the method of bleeding control: I - patients without an additional bleeding protocol (control group); II - patients receiving IV TXA (TXA group); and III - patients receiving the exact TXA protocol plus intraoperative local infiltration analgesia (TXA + LIA group). Blood loss was measured according to the maximal decrease in Hb compared to the preoperative Hb level.

RESULTS

The mean hospitalization duration was 7.02 (SD 1.34) days in the control group, 6.08 (SD 1.06) days in the TXA group, and 5.56 (SD 0.79) in the TXA + LIA group. The most significant decrease in haemoglobin was found in the control group, which was an average of 30.08%. The average decrease in haemoglobin was 25.17% (p < 0.001) in the TXA group and 23.67% (p < 0.001) in the TXA + LIA group. A decrease in the rate of allogeneic blood transfusions was observed: 24.4% in the control group, 9.9% in the TXA group, and 8% in the TXA + LIA group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the separate administration of tranexamic acid, the combination of perioperative administration with local infiltration analgesia significantly reduced blood loss in patients after total knee replacement.

Is tranexamic acid safe for the hip joint?

To show the effects of tranexamic acid, which is a drug frequently used to control bleeding, on the hip joint and sciatic nerve in animal experiments. There were 15 rats in each of the 3 groups, with a total of 45 rats. Topical saline injections were applied to the first group, topical TXA injections to the second group, and intravenous (IV) TXA injections to the third group. In the samples taken from the hip joint 3 weeks later, femoral head cartilage, sciatic nerve, and joint capsule thicknesses were analyzed histologically. Statistically significantly more cartilage degradation was detected in the femoral head cartilage in both the IV and intraarticular TXA group when compared to the control group. The groups were also compared in terms of acetabular cartilage; however, no histological difference was found between the groups. It was seen that when the femoral head cartilage thickness (the average of the measurements made from 3 different points were used) was examined, the cartilage thickness in the topical TXA group was less when compared to the other 2 groups. However, this difference was determined to not be statistically significant. The data of the hip joint capsule thickness measurement, it was found that the capsule thickness in the topical TXA applied group was less when compared to the other 2 groups. However, this difference was not statistically significant. When the sciatic nerves in all 3 groups were compared, no different staining characteristics were found in the immunofluorescence examination. TXA, which is frequently used in orthopedic practice, shows negative effects on hip joint cartilage in both topical and intravenous application.

Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip and knee replacement surgery is a well-established means of improving quality of life, but is associated with a significant risk of bleeding. One-third of people are estimated to be anaemic before hip or knee replacement surgery; coupled with the blood lost during surgery, up to 90% of individuals are anaemic postoperatively. As a result, people undergoing orthopaedic surgery receive 3.9% of all packed red blood cell transfusions in the UK. Bleeding and the need for allogeneic blood transfusions has been shown to increase the risk of surgical site infection and mortality, and is associated with an increased duration of hospital stay and costs associated with surgery. Reducing blood loss during surgery may reduce the risk of allogeneic blood transfusion, reduce costs and improve outcomes following surgery. Several pharmacological interventions are available and currently employed as part of routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for preventing blood loss in elective primary or revision hip or knee replacement, and to identify optimal administration of interventions regarding timing, dose and route, using network meta-analysis (NMA) methodology.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, from inception to 18 October 2022: CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Transfusion Evidence Library (Evidentia), ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs of people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery only. We excluded non-elective or emergency procedures, and studies published since 2010 that had not been prospectively registered (Cochrane Injuries policy). There were no restrictions on gender, ethnicity or age (adults only). We excluded studies that used standard of care as the comparator. Eligible interventions included: antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid (TXA), aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA)), desmopressin, factor VIIa and XIII, fibrinogen, fibrin sealants and non-fibrin sealants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed the review according to standard Cochrane methodology. Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using CINeMA. We presented direct (pairwise) results using RevMan Web and performed the NMA using BUGSnet. We were interested in the following primary outcomes: need for allogenic blood transfusion (up to 30 days) and all-cause mortality (deaths occurring up to 30 days after the operation), and the following secondary outcomes: mean number of transfusion episodes per person (up to 30 days), re-operation due to bleeding (within seven days), length of hospital stay and adverse events related to the intervention received.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 102 studies. Twelve studies did not report the number of included participants; the other 90 studies included 8418 participants. Trials included more women (64%) than men (36%). In the NMA for allogeneic blood transfusion, we included 47 studies (4398 participants). Most studies examined TXA (58 arms, 56%). We found that TXA, given intra-articularly and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g pre-incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively, ranked the highest, with an anticipated absolute effect of 147 fewer blood transfusions per 1000 people (150 fewer to 104 fewer) (53% chance of ranking 1st) within the NMA (risk ratio (RR) 0.02, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0 to 0.31; moderate-certainty evidence). This was followed by TXA given orally at a total dose of 3 g pre-incision and postoperatively (RR 0.06, 95% CrI 0.00 to 1.34; low-certainty evidence) and TXA given intravenously and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g intraoperatively and postoperatively (RR 0.10, 95% CrI 0.02 to 0.55; low-certainty evidence). Aprotinin (RR 0.59, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.96; low-certainty evidence), topical fibrin (RR 0.86, CrI 0.25 to 2.93; very low-certainty evidence) and EACA (RR 0.60, 95% CrI 0.29 to 1.27; very low-certainty evidence) were not shown to be as effective compared with TXA at reducing the risk of blood transfusion. We were unable to perform an NMA for our primary outcome all-cause mortality within 30 days of surgery due to the large number of studies with zero events, or because the outcome was not reported. In the NMA for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), we included 19 studies (2395 participants). Most studies examined TXA (27 arms, 64%). No studies assessed desmopressin, EACA or topical fibrin. We found that TXA given intravenously and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g intraoperatively and postoperatively ranked the highest, with an anticipated absolute effect of 67 fewer DVTs per 1000 people (67 fewer to 34 more) (26% chance of ranking first) within the NMA (RR 0.16, 95% CrI 0.02 to 1.43; low-certainty evidence). This was followed by TXA given intravenously and intra-articularly at a total dose of 2 g pre-incision and intraoperatively (RR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.00 to 9.12; low-certainty evidence) and TXA given intravenously and intra-articularly, total dose greater than 3 g pre-incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively (RR 0.13, 95% CrI 0.01 to 3.11; low-certainty evidence). Aprotinin was not shown to be as effective compared with TXA (RR 0.67, 95% CrI 0.28 to 1.62; very low-certainty evidence). We were unable to perform an NMA for our secondary outcomes pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction and CVA (stroke) within 30 days, mean number of transfusion episodes per person (up to 30 days), re-operation due to bleeding (within seven days), or length of hospital stay, due to the large number of studies with zero events, or because the outcome was not reported by enough studies to build a network. There are 30 ongoing trials planning to recruit 3776 participants, the majority examining TXA (26 trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that of all the interventions studied, TXA is probably the most effective intervention for preventing bleeding in people undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery. Aprotinin and EACA may not be as effective as TXA at preventing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. We were not able to draw strong conclusions on the optimal dose, route and timing of administration of TXA. We found that TXA given at higher doses tended to rank higher in the treatment hierarchy, and we also found that it may be more beneficial to use a mixed route of administration (oral and intra-articular, oral and intravenous, or intravenous and intra-articular). Oral administration may be as effective as intravenous administration of TXA. We found little to no evidence of harm associated with higher doses of tranexamic acid in the risk of DVT. However, we are not able to definitively draw these conclusions based on the trials included within this review.

Update on the efficacy and safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the management of hip fracture surgeries in comparison with placebo.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted from August 6, 2021. Eligible studies included randomized clinical trials and prospective studies comparing the use of intravenous TXA in patients treated for hip fractures, in comparison with placebo. Review Manager was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen prospective studies including 14 RCTs met the eligibility criteria. The results favored the TXA group in the quantity of total blood loss (MD =  - 196.91 mL, 95% CI - 247.59, - 146.23, I2 = 92%), intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 26.86 mL, 95% CI - 36.96, - 16.78, I2 = 62%), and rate of blood transfusion (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.28, 0.42, I2 = 0%). TXA also exhibited higher hemoglobin level at day 1 (MD = 6.77 g/L, 95% CI 4.30, 9.24, I2 = 83%) and day 3 (MD = 7.02 g/L, 95% CI 3.30, 10.74, I2 = 82%) postoperatively. There was no significant difference found in the incidence of thromboembolic events from occurring between the two groups, such as deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.73, 2.02, I2 = 0%) and pulmonary embolism (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.33, 2.05, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Administration of intravenous TXA appears to reduce blood loss, rate of blood transfusions and pose no increased risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, TXA should be considered by physicians when managing hip fracture patients.

The limited use of a tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty under a contemporary enhanced recovery protocol has no meaningful benefit: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to determine whether the limited use of tourniquets during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would be more beneficial under the contemporary enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol than the conventional use of tourniquets.

METHODS

One hundred patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA were randomly assigned to the limited tourniquet (LT, n = 51) and conventional tourniquet (CT, n = 49) groups. Operation time, serial hemoglobin drops, calculated blood loss, transfusion rate, D-dimer levels, and the presence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were assessed. In addition, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain around the knee and thigh were measured while resting during the day, at night, and during ambulation. Opioid consumption, range of motion, knee circumference, and postoperative complications were also analyzed. Isokinetic muscle strength, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores, and Euro-QoL-5D scores were also assessed before and 3 months after TKA. For statistical analysis, Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare the differences in categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using an independent t test or Mann‒Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The average tourniquet time was 46.7 min in the CT group and 5.4 min in the LT group. Knee pain on the first night after surgery was significantly higher in the CT group (3.2 vs. 4.6, p = 0.033). However, daytime pain in the thigh at 2 weeks and in the knee at 3 months after TKA were higher in the LT group than in the CT group (p = 0.048 and p = 0.036, respectively). The D-dimer level 3 months after TKA was also higher in the LT group than in the CT group (p = 0.028), but there was no difference in DVT incidence between the two groups (n.s.). Additionally, there were no significant differences in the other variables between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the limited use of tourniquets did not increase the operation time, blood loss, or transfusion rate, this study found that the limited use of tourniquets would not provide additional meaningful benefit in reducing pain and early functional restoration after TKA when applying the ERAS protocol.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Artificial neural networks for the prediction of transfusion rates in primary total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the increased utilization of tranexamic acid, acute blood loss anemia necessitating allogeneic blood transfusion persists as a post-operative complication. The prevalence of allogeneic blood transfusion in primary THA has been reported to be as high as 9%. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate novel machine learning models for the prediction of transfusion rates following primary total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 7265 consecutive patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty were evaluated using a single tertiary referral institution database. Patient charts were manually reviewed to identify patient demographics and surgical variables that may be associated with transfusion rates. Four state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms were developed to predict transfusion rates following primary THA, and these models were assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The factors most significantly associated with transfusion rates include tranexamic acid usage, bleeding disorders, and pre-operative hematocrit (< 33%). The four machine learning models all achieved excellent performance across discrimination (AUC > 0.78), calibration, and decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study developed machine learning models for the prediction of patient-specific transfusion rates following primary total hip arthroplasty. The results represent a novel application of machine learning, and has the potential to improve outcomes and pre-operative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control retrospective analysis.

No Difference in Blood Loss and Risk of Transfusion Between Patients Treated with One or Two Doses of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid After Simultaneous Bilateral TKA

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is often used to prevent excessive blood loss during bilateral TKA. Although it diminishes blood loss, TXA may have a potentially elevated thrombogenic risk with extra, unnecessary doses of TXA in this high-risk population. To date, the most efficacious dosing protocol in this setting has not yet been ascertained.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We compared one versus two doses of intravenous TXA in the setting of same-day bilateral TKA in terms of (1) perioperative blood loss that occurred during the hospital stay, (2) transfusion usage during the hospital stay, and (3) major complications occurring within 30 days of surgery.

METHODS

Between August 2013 and October 2016, 309 patients underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA performed by one of five attending surgeons. During that time, indications for same-day bilateral TKA included bilateral knee pathology in which each knee was independently indicated for TKA and the patient preferred bilateral simultaneous TKAs versus staged bilateral surgeries. Patients who had cardiac disease or an American Society for Anesthesiologists physical classification score of greater than 2 were not generally indicated for bilateral simultaneous TKAs. After preoperative clearance from the primary physician and/or specialists as necessary, the decision for bilateral TKA was at the judgment of the operating surgeons. Input from anesthesia occurred at the time of the surgery as the procedure was performed in a sequential fashion allowing for the surgery to be restrained to a single limb if anesthesia identified concerns at the completion of the first TKA. The current retrospective, comparative series compared generally sequential groups in terms of TXA usage. Between August 2013 and July 2015, we used two TXA doses. Patients received 1 g of intravenous TXA as a bolus immediately after the last tourniquet release and were given a 1-g intravenous bolus 6 hours after the initial dose. A total of 167 patients were treated with this approach, of whom 96% (161) are fully analyzed here. Between August 2015 and October 2016, our approach changed to a single TXA dose. The dosing regimen change occurred as a group decision for change of practice and occurred mid-year to coincide with the fellowship year cycle. Patients received a 1-g bolus of intravenous TXA immediately after the final tourniquet release. A total of 105 patients were treated with this approach, of whom 89% (93) are fully analyzed here. An additional 37 patients were excluded because they did not receive any TXA because of a medical contraindication such as history of venous thromboembolism, history of thrombotic stroke, cardiac stent in the past 2 years, atrial fibrillation, or long-term anticoagulation therapy. We compared patients who received one versus two doses in terms of blood loss, transfusion usage, and 30-day major complications. The mean age was 65 years for patients receiving one dose and 67 years for patients receiving two doses (p = 0.17). The one-dose group comprised 67% (62 of 93) women and the two-dose group comprised 61% (98 of 161) women (p = 0.36). Blood loss was defined as change in the hemoglobin level (the last recorded value before discharge subtracted from the preoperative value). During the study period, the decision to transfuse was based on a hemoglobin level less than 8.0 g/dL or at higher levels for symptomatic patients, patients with cardiac disease, or at the discretion of the attending surgeon. We defined complications as major medical events that included cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

With the numbers available, there was no difference in blood loss between patients treated with one and those treated with two doses of TXA (mean hemoglobin decrease -3.5 ± 1.2 g/dL versus -3.5 ± 1.0 g/dL, respectively; mean difference 0.03 g/dL [95% CI -0.2 to 0.3 g/dL]; p = 0.80). No patient in either group received a transfusion. There was no difference in the proportion of patients in either group who experienced a cerebrovascular accident (0% [0 of 93] versus 1% [1 of 161]; p > 0.99), deep vein thrombosis (1% [1 of 93] versus 0% [0 of 161]; p = 0.37), or pulmonary embolism (1% [1 of 93] versus 1% [1 of 161]; p > 0.99). No patient in either the one-dose or two-dose TXA groups experienced a myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that a single dose of intravenous TXA may be adequate to control excessive blood loss and reduce blood transfusion in simultaneous bilateral TKA. Despite its short half-life, TXA still appears to be effective in this demanding procedure without requiring prolonged plasma concentrations obtained from multiple doses. Additional high-quality studies are still needed to determine the most appropriate dosing regimen.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Tranexamic acid combined with compression dressing reduces blood loss in gluteal muscle contracture surgery

Background

Blood loss and incision-related complications caused by the surgical procedure to release gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) put negative effects on the surgical outcomes. Current procedures to prevent blood loss and complications are not satisfactory. The current study aimed to determine whether tranexamic acid (TXA) in combination with pressure dressing reduce the amount of blood loss, the rate of incision-related complications, and the rate of readmission for patients undergoing surgeries to release GMC.

Methods

49 GMC patients were finally included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups: study group and control group. Patients in both groups received minimally invasive surgery to release GMC except that in the study group, patients were administered a dosage of 20 mg/kg of intravenous TXA preoperatively, and 2 subsequent dosages of TXA at 10 mg/kg at two time points: 3 and 6 h after the first dose. Gauze soaked with TXA was used to pack the wound for 10 min before the incision closure. Then the wound was pressure-wrapped with a hip-spica bandage for 24 h after the surgery in the study group.

Results

The level of UBL in the study group was significantly lower compared to that in the control group. Similar results were also found for UMHD and UMAD. The incision-related postoperative complications were greatly decreased in the study group compared to those of the control group as well. So was the 30-day readmission rate. All patients in both groups reached “excellent” or “good” level with respect to the postoperative function evaluation.

Conclusions

Intravenous and topical application of TXA combined with 24 h pressure hip-spica bandage reduces perioperative blood loss, rate of incision-related complications, and the rate of readmission for GMC patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical releasing procedure.

Trial Registration Chinese Clinical and Trial Registry ChiCTR2000039216, registration date 2020/10/22, retrospectively registered

Tranexamic acid attenuates early post-operative systemic inflammatory response and nutritional loss and avoids reduction of fibrinogen in total hip arthroplasty within an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway

PURPOSE

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an intervention with significant inflammatory response. The impact of additional doses of tranexamic acid (TXA) on inflammatory response, trauma and nutrition parameters, and coagulation and fibrinolysis changes has rarely been reported.

METHODS

A prospective double-blind randomized trial was performed on elective primary THA. Ninety-nine adult patients were recruited consecutively from 2019 to 2020. They were randomized to receive single-dose of TXA before incision, another dose of TXA at three hours post-operatively, or another two doses of TXA at three and six hours  post-operatively. The primary outcomes included changes in white blood cell (WBC) counts, creatine kinase (CK), haemoglobin(Hb), and albumin(Alb); the secondary outcomes included coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters.

RESULTS

Compared with single-dose TXA, patients received three dose TXA had significantly reduced WBC counts and fibrinogen/fibrin degradation product (FDP) levels, increased albumin and fibrinogen levels, and prolonged PT on post-operative day (POD) three. Though patients received three dose TXA had a tendency that increased Hb, decreased CK, reduced D-D, and prolonged APTT on POD3, it is not statistically significant. And the other measured outcomes on POD1 and POD2W shared a similar statistical result, except PT. The PT is significantly prolonged on POD2W in three dose group compared with single dose.

CONCLUSION

Three-dose TXA contribute to attenuate early post-operative systemic inflammatory response and nutritional loss, increase fibrinogen, reduce FDP levels, and prolong PT in THA patients within an ERAS pathway, which may associate with reduced early post-operative haemorrhagic tendency, thrombosis risks, and hypercoagulability.

One Dose Versus Two Doses of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Total Joint Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Despite its widespread use, a single formulation or dosing regimen of tranexamic acid (TXA) has not been universally agreed on for total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare previously uninvestigated single-dose and two-dose regimens in postoperative hemoglobin level and secondary outcomes within 30 days of surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective search of our institution's database of patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty and primary total hip arthroplasty between January 1, 2017, and July 1, 2019, was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: one group received a 1-g bolus of intravenous TXA just before incision and another intravenous 1-g bolus during wound closure, and the second group received a single 1-g intravenous bolus of TXA just before incision. Two doses of TXA were administered in 873 procedures, and a single dose was administered in 647 procedures.

RESULTS

A single intravenous TXA dose just before incision was comparable with using two doses of intravenous TXA on patients' postoperative hemoglobin value, length of stay, rate of transfusion, and 30-day postoperative complication rate, although those receiving two doses of TXA trended toward being less likely to require a transfusion (odds ratio = 0.561; 95% confidence interval: 0.296 to 1.062; P = 0.08). A sensitivity analysis was unable to identify a preoperative hemoglobin value that would identify whether patients would benefit from two versus one dose of TXA.

DISCUSSION

The use of a single intravenous TXA dose was as efficacious as two doses, without an increase in postoperative complications. Further studies may identify patient subgroups that would benefit from a second dose.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

[Comparison of two doses of intra-articular tranexamic acid on postoperative bleeding in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial]

INTRODUCTION

Tranexamic Acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic that inhibits the fibrinolytic activity of plasmin is used to decrease perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in orthopedic surgery. The aim of our study was to compare postoperative bleeding in two intra-articular doses (1g and 2g) of tranexamic acid in adult patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.

METHOD

We conducted a single-operator, randomized, and controlled, double-blind study in two groups. The G1 group received 1g of intra-articular TXA and the G2 group 2g of intra-articular TXA. Both groups received 15mg.kg^-1 IV before the surgical incision (TXA induction dose) and then 10mg.kg^-1, orally, 6 and 12hours after the induction dose of TXA. The primary endpoint was bleeding measured by blood loss in postoperative drainage. Secondary outcomes were change in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels on the first and third postoperative days, and the need for transfusion during hospitalization.

RESULTS

In total, 100 patients were randomized, and 100 were included in the analysis. Blood loss in postoperative drainage was similar in both groups (200±50 vs. 250±50mL, G1 and G2 groups respectively). Change in hematocrit and hemoglobin values (% of change) between preoperative and day 3 were not statically significant between groups G1 and G2 (18±5 vs. 21±4; 21±7 vs. 22±5 respectively). No patients received blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not show superiority of 2g of intra-articular tranexamic acid compared to 1g. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04085575.

Comparison of two doses of intra-articular tranexamic acid on postoperative bleeding in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Method

Results

Conclusions

The effect of tourniquet uses on total blood loss, early function, and pain after primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Aims

The aim of this study was to examine whether tourniquet use can improve perioperative blood loss, early function recovery, and pain after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of multiple-dose intravenous tranexamic acid.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial including 180 patients undergoing TKA with multiple doses of intravenous tranexamic acid. One group was treated with a tourniquet during the entire procedure, the second group received a tourniquet during cementing, and the third group did not receive a tourniquet. All patients received the same protocol of intravenous tranexamic acid (20 mg/kg) before skin incision, and three and six hours later (10 mg/kg). The primary outcome measure was perioperative blood loss. Secondary outcome measures were creatine kinase (CK), CRP, interleukin-6 (IL-6), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, limb swelling ratio, quadriceps strength, straight leg raising, range of motion (ROM), American Knee Society Score (KSS), and adverse events.

Results

The mean total blood loss was lowest in the no-tourniquet group at 867.32 ml (SD 201.11), increased in the limited-tourniquet group at 1024.35 ml (SD 176.35), and was highest in the tourniquet group at 1,213.00 ml (SD 211.48). The hidden blood loss was lowest in the no-tourniquet group (both p < 0.001). There was less mean intraoperative blood loss in the tourniquet group (77.48 ml (SD 24.82)) than in the limited-tourniquet group (137.04 ml (SD 26.96)) and the no-tourniquet group (212.99 ml (SD 56.35); both p < 0.001). Patients in the tourniquet group showed significantly higher levels of muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers such as CK, CRP, and IL-6 than the other two groups (p < 0.05). Outcomes for VAS pain scores, limb swelling ratio, quadriceps strength, straight leg raising, ROM, and KSS were significantly better in the no-tourniquet group at three weeks postoperatively (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences at three months. No significant differences were observed among the three groups with respect to transfusion rate, thrombotic events, or the length of hospital stay.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent TKA with multiple doses of intravenous tranexamic acid but without a tourniquet presented lower total blood loss and hidden blood loss, and they showed less postoperative inflammation reaction, less muscle damage, lower VAS pain score, and better early knee function. Our results argue for not using a tourniquet during TKA.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(6):322–332.

Multiple intravenous tranexamic acid doses in total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely used in the orthopedic field and particularly in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Its efficacy and safety in reducing the blood loss in TKA have been well-documented in the current literature. Little data regarding TKA without tourniquet and TXA exist. Our aim is to compare three different dosages of intravenous (IV) TXA in TKA without tourniquet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 180 patients undergoing TKA for knee osteoarthritis were stratified in three equal groups. All surgeries were performed under spinal anesthesia, without tourniquet. Group A (60 patients) received 15 mg/kg of IV TXA given on induction, Group B (60 patients) received an additional dose of IV TXA (15 mg/kg) 3 h after incision and Group C (60 patients) received an additional (third) dose 3 h later (15 mg/kg). The measured outcomes were the change in hemoglobin (Hb) from pre-operatively to post-operatively, the amount of blood transfusion given (units), the functional and quality of life (QoL) and pain assessment based on their corresponding scoring system.

RESULTS

Calculated blood loss, Hb decrease and transfusion rate were significantly lower in Group C (p value < 0.05). Additionally, patients that had been included in the three-dosage group benefited much more in terms of faster rehabilitation, better QoL, decreased post-operative pain, with no increase in complications.

CONCLUSION

According to our results, three doses of IV TXA have effectively and safely reduced blood loss and the need of allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing TKA without tourniquet, with additional patients-related benefits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Exclusion criteria and adverse events in perioperative trials of tranexamic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an inexpensive therapy effective at minimizing perioperative blood loss and transfusion. However, it remains underutilized due to safety concerns. To date, no evidence-based guidelines exist identifying which patients should not receive TXA therapy. This study determined patient groups for whom safety information regarding TXA is lacking due to common exclusion from perioperative TXA trials.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review searching the databases Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) administering systemic TXA perioperatively to elective or emergent surgery patients were eligible. Our primary outcome was to describe exclusion criteria of RCTs, and the secondary outcome was TXA safety. A descriptive synthesis of exclusion criteria was performed, and TXA safety was assessed by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 268 eligible RCTs were included. Meta-analysis showed that systemic TXA did not increase risk of adverse events compared to placebo or no intervention (relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.12). Patient groups commonly excluded from perioperative TXA trials, and thus potentially lacking TXA safety data, were those with major comorbidities, a history of thromboembolism, medication use affecting coagulation, TXA allergy, and coagulopathy. Exclusion of patients with major comorbidities may not be necessary; we showed that the risk of adverse events was similar in studies that excluded patients with major comorbidities and those that did not.

CONCLUSION

Sufficient evidence exists to develop perioperative guidelines for TXA use in many populations. Further studies evaluating perioperative TXA use in patients with a history of thromboembolism are warranted.

Evaluation of the use of tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty

Objective

Evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing bleeding in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

101 patients were randomized into two groups: the tranexamic acid group (n = 51) and the placebo group (n = 50). Patients were compared regarding the following parameters: reduction of hemoglobin, total estimated blood loss, drain output, and postoperative blood transfusion rate.

Results

Comparing the groups, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the following parameters: reduction of hemoglobin, decreased hematocrit, estimated blood loss, and drain output. All values were lower in the tranexamic acid group. Only placebo group patients required blood transfusion.

Conclusion

The use of intravenous tranexamic acid is effective to reduce bleeding in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

The Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

A growing body of published research on tranexamic acid (TXA) suggests that it is effective in reducing blood loss and the risk for transfusion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate TXA in primary TKA as the basis for the efficacy recommendations of the combined clinical practice guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine on the use of TXA in primary total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for publications before July 2017 on TXA in primary total joint arthroplasty. All included studies underwent qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing. Direct and indirect comparisons were performed as a network meta-analysis, and results were tested for consistency.

RESULTS

After critical appraisal of the available 2113 publications, 67 articles were identified as representing the best available evidence. Topical, intravenous (IV), and oral TXA formulations were all superior to placebo in terms of decreasing blood loss and risk of transfusion, while no formulation was clearly superior. Use of repeat IV and oral TXA dosing and higher doses of IV and topical TXA did not significantly reduce blood loss or risk of transfusion. Preincision administration of IV TXA had inconsistent findings with a reduced risk of transfusion but no effect on volume of blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong evidence supports the efficacy of TXA to decrease blood loss and the risk of transfusion after primary TKA. No TXA formulation, dosage, or number of doses provided clearly improved blood-sparing properties for TKA. Moderate evidence supports preincision administration of IV TXA to improve efficacy.

The Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Direct Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is effective in reducing blood loss in total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but concerns still remain regarding the drug's safety. The purpose of this direct meta-analysis was to evaluate and establish a basis for the safety recommendations of the combined clinical practice guidelines on the use of TXA in primary TJA.

METHODS

A search was completed for studies published before July 2017 on TXA in primary TJA. We performed qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing and a direct comparison meta-analysis. We used the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 or greater as a proxy for patients at higher risk for complications in general and performed a meta-regression analysis to investigate the influence of comorbidity burden on the risk of arterial thromboembolic event and venous thromboembolic event (VTE).

RESULTS

Topical, intravenous, and oral TXA were not associated with an increased risk of VTE after TJA. In addition, meta-regression demonstrated that TXA use in patients with an ASA status of 3 or greater was not associated with an increased risk of VTE after total knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Although most studies included in our analysis excluded patients with a history of prior thromboembolic events, our findings support the lack of evidence of harm from TXA administration in patients undergoing TJA. Moderate evidence supports the safety of TXA in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with an ASA score of 3 or greater. The benefits of using TXA appear to outweigh the potential risks of thromboembolic events even in patients with a higher comorbidity.

Efficacy and safety of multiple boluses of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid at reducing blood loss after primary total knee arthroplasty without a tourniquet: A prospective randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to examine whether the administration of multiple boluses of oral or intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) postoperatively were equivalent at reducing blood loss and the inflammatory and fibrinolytic responses in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without a tourniquet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial, patients undergoing primary THA were randomized into either an oral or intravenous TXA group. All patients received 1 dose of 20 mg/kg intravenous TXA 5-10 min before skin incision. Patients in the oral TXA group then received 3 doses of 2 g oral TXA at 4, 10, and 16 h postoperatively, while patients in the intravenous TXA group received 3 doses of 1 g intravenous TXA at 6, 12, and 18 h after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the hemoglobin (Hb) or hematocrit (Hct) drop on postoperative day 1 (14.7 ± 10.5 vs 14.4 ± 9.6 g/L, p = 0.869; 0.042 ± 0.032 vs 0.040 ± 0.028, p = 0.781) and 3 (22.6 ± 10.6 vs 20.5 ± 9.7 g/L, p = 0.300; 0.059 ± 0.031 vs 0.054 ± 0.031, p = 0.332). No patients needed an allogeneic blood transfusion. The mean total blood loss, hidden blood loss, length of hospital stay, the level of inflammatory and fibrinolytic markers on the first and third postoperative days, and the incidence of complications were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in Hb and Hct drop, blood loss, inflammatory and fibrinolytic responses in primary TKA without a tourniquet between those who received multiple boluses of oral or intravenous TXA after surgery in current scheme.

One Dose of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Is Equivalent to Two Doses in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) helps to prevent excessive blood loss during total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but the most efficacious dosing protocol has not been ascertained. The purpose of this study was to identify whether 1 dose of intravenous TXA is equivalent to 2 doses for reducing blood loss and transfusion rates following THA and TKA without an increase in complications.

METHODS

We identified 1,736 patients who underwent THA (592 who did not receive TXA, 454 who received 1 dose of TXA, and 690 who received 2 doses) and 2,042 patients who underwent TKA (744 who did not receive TXA, 499 who received 1 dose, and 799 who received 2 doses) from 2012 to 2016. The differences among groups with regard to the change in hemoglobin levels, rate of allogeneic blood transfusions, and rate of complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent THA and received 1 dose or 2 doses of TXA had similar drops in the mean hemoglobin levels postoperatively (2.9 g/dL and 3.1 g/dL, respectively; p = 0.197) and both had a smaller drop than the control group (3.6 g/dL; p < 0.001 compared with the 1 and 2-dose groups). These findings were confirmed by a multivariate analysis that controlled for age, sex, and preoperative hemoglobin level. Transfusion was required for 12.5% of the patients who underwent THA without receiving TXA, no patient who received 1 dose, and 0.7% of the patients who received 2 doses. The patients who underwent TKA and received 1 dose or 2 doses of TXA had similar mean drops in the hemoglobin level postoperatively (2.4 g/dL and 2.4 g/dL, respectively; p = 0.891), and both had less of a drop than the control group (2.9 g/dL; p < 0.001 compared with the 1 and 2-dose groups). These findings were also confirmed by a multivariate analysis that controlled for age, sex, and preoperative hemoglobin level. Transfusion was required for 4.3% of the patients who underwent TKA without receiving TXA, 0.4% of those who received 1 dose, and 0.3% of those who received 2 doses. Similar rates of perioperative complications occurred among all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

One dose of TXA was as effective as 2 doses for decreasing blood loss and transfusion rates after THA and TKA without an increase in complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss, D-Dimer, and Fibrinogen Kinetics in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

BACKGROUND

Antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid reduce operative blood loss and blood product transfusion requirements in patients undergoing surgical correction of scoliosis. The factors involved in the unrelenting coagulopathy seen in scoliosis surgery are not well understood. One potential contributor is activation of the fibrinolytic system during a surgical procedure, likely related to clot dissolution and consumption of fibrinogen. The addition of tranexamic acid during a surgical procedure may mitigate the coagulopathy by impeding the derangement in D-dimer and fibrinogen kinetics.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who had undergone surgical correction of adult spinal deformity between January 2010 and July 2016 at our institution. Intraoperative hemostatic data, surgical time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion records were analyzed for patients before and after the addition of tranexamic acid to our protocol. Each patient who received tranexamic acid and met inclusion criteria was cohort-matched with a patient who underwent a surgical procedure without tranexamic acid administration.

RESULTS

There were 17 patients in the tranexamic acid cohort, with a mean age of 60.7 years, and 17 patients in the control cohort, with a mean age of 60.9 years. Estimated blood loss (932 ± 539 mL compared with 1,800 ± 1,029 mL; p = 0.005) and packed red blood-cell transfusions (1.5 ± 1.6 units compared with 4.0 ± 2.1 units; p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the tranexamic acid cohort. In all single-stage surgical procedures that met inclusion criteria, the rise of D-dimer was attenuated from 8.3 ± 5.0 μg/mL in the control cohort to 3.3 ± 3.2 μg/mL for the tranexamic acid cohort (p < 0.001). The consumption of fibrinogen was 98.4 ± 42.6 mg/dL in the control cohort but was reduced in the tranexamic acid cohort to 60.6 ± 35.1 mg/dL (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing spinal surgery, intravenous administration of tranexamic acid is effective at reducing intraoperative blood loss. Monitoring of D-dimer and fibrinogen during spinal surgery suggests that tranexamic acid impedes the fibrinolytic pathway by decreasing consumption of fibrinogen and clot dissolution as evidenced by the reduced formation of D-dimer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intra-articular Application is More Effective Than Intravenous Application of Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal administration route of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the effect of TXA on hidden blood loss and total blood loss are undetermined. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intravenous versus intra-articular application of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 150 patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomly distributed to 3 groups (IV, intra-articular, and control group; each 50 patients) and administrated TXA (1 g IV and 50 mL intra-articular saline, 1 g intra-articularly and 50 mL intra-articular saline, and 0 g and 50 mL intra-articular saline, respectively). The amount of total and hidden blood loss (HBL), drainage, transfusion, changes in hemoglobin levels, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Intra-articular use of TXA reduced more total blood loss (P = .011) and reduced more total 48 hours drainage volume than IV use of TXA (P < .001). Two patients received transfusion in IV and control group. No deep venous thrombosis or other severe complications had occurred. The HBL volume had no significant difference among the control, IV, and intra-articular groups (708.6 ± 308.2, 651.7 ± 302.9, and 625.2 ± 252.1 mL, respectively; which was 65.6%, 70.8%, and 81.1% of the total loss).

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular administration of TXA significantly reduced total blood loss and drainage volume to a greater degree than IV injection in total knee arthroplasty without reduction of HBL.

An Aprotinin Containing Fibrin Sealant Does Not Reduce Blood Loss in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Fibrin sealants are topical agents used to reduce perioperative blood loss; however, their efficacy in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine if a fibrin sealant containing aprotinin as an antifibrinolytic agent, TISSEEL (Baxter, Deerfield, IL), reduces postoperative blood loss and transfusion during THA when compared with intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) and control groups.

METHODS

Three retrospective uniform cohorts of primary THA procedures were identified, from a prospectively maintained database: 1 group who received TISSEEL, 1 group who received 1 g IV TXA, and 1 group who received neither (control). There were 80 patients in each group. Outcome measures included the lowest measured hemoglobin during postoperative hospitalization, greatest decrease in hemoglobin from preoperative to postoperative values, and blood transfusion rates.

RESULTS

The minimum postoperative hemoglobin level was significantly lower for TISSEEL patients compared with that of IV TXA patients (P = .021) and no different when compared with that of control patients (P = .134). Patients receiving fibrin sealant had a greater hemoglobin level decrease compared with that of IV TXA (P = .029) and control (P = .036). Postoperative transfusion rates were no different for the group receiving TISSEEL compared with those of control (P = .375) and were statistically greater when compared with those of IV TXA (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

TISSEEL fibrin sealant does not reduce postoperative blood loss or transfusions; however, IV TXA reduced postoperative transfusions compared with TISSEEL and control. Therefore, TXA is recommended to reduce perioperative blood loss, while, utilization of a fibrin sealant requires further refinements before being adopted for routine use in THA.

A prospective, randomized, comparative study of intravenous alone and combined intravenous and intraarticular administration of tranexamic acid in primary total knee replacement

Background

Studies on the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) to improve clinical outcomes after joint arthroplasty have reported contrasting results between intravenous (IV) TXA alone and combined IV and intraarticular (IA) administration. We compared the effectiveness of the 2 methods in providing higher postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

A total of 100 TKA patients were randomly assigned to receive either IV TXA alone (group 1) or combined IV and topical IA TXA (group 2). Hb and hematocrit levels were measured before and after surgery. The amount of drained blood and transfused blood for the 2 groups was compared.

Results

The Hb level was significantly higher at postoperative day 4, together with a positive, albeit not significant, trend toward less postoperative blood loss in the group that received combined IV and IA TXA. No postoperative infections or deep venous thrombosis events occurred.

Conclusions

This study reinforces evidence that, as compared to IV TXA alone, combined IV and IA administration of TXA has a synergic effect, leading to higher postoperative Hb levels without influencing drug safety in TKA patients.

Use of tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

different strategies have been developed to reduce blood loss in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The efficacy of both systemic and local tranexamic acid (TXA) administration is demonstrated in the literature. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of systemic, local and combined (systemic + local) administration of TXA in reducing blood loss after TKA.

METHODS

we enrolled all patients submitted to a primary TKA in our department between November 2014 and August 2015. They were divided into three groups corresponding to the method of TXA administration used: intravenous (IV), intra-articular (IA), and a combination of the two. Demographic data, as well as preoperative hemoglobin and platelet levels, were collected. The primary outcome was the maximum hemoglobin loss, while the secondary outcomes were the amount of blood in the drain (cc/hour) and the rate of transfusions; postoperative pain was also assessed. Student's t-test or a χ² test was used to evaluate between-group differences, using p<0.05 as the cut-off for statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

the sample comprised 34 patients: IV, 10 cases; IA, 15 cases, and combined (IV + IA), 9 cases. The average age of the patients was 71.1±6.4 years. No significant differences in the outcome measures were found between the groups, with the exception of a significantly lower maximum hemoglobin loss in the combined versus the IV group (p=0.02). There were no differences between the groups in the amount of blood in the drain or the rate of transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

the data from this preliminary study, as well as data from the literature, confirm that TXA administration is safe and effective in reducing total blood loss in TKA, and no administration protocol seems to be superior to the others.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

The combined use of oral and topical tranexamic acid is a safe, efficient and low-cost method in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates in total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

The combined (IV (intravenous) + topical) use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to be a safe method and more effective than single (IV or topical) application. The optimal administration method of TXA is still being investigated and safety, efficiency and cost are the three main crucial parameters in achieving the best administration method. We aimed to determine whether combined (oral + topical) use of TXA reduced blood loss and transfusion rates more than single (topical) administration in TKA and whether oral + topical use is as safe and efficient as the IV + topical use, in addition to the main advantage of relatively low cost.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized study, 100 patients were randomly assigned to either the topical TXA group or the combined (oral + topical) TXA group. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, body mass index or gender. The haemoglobin and haematocrit levels of each patient were recorded preoperatively and on post-operative days 0, 1, 2 and 3. The post-operative suction drainage and blood transfusion volumes were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between the groups in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels on post-operative days 0, 1, 2 and 3 ( p < 0.05) in favour of the combined group. The post-operative drainage amounts ( p = 0.0001), measured blood loss volume ( p = 0.003) and transfusion rates ( p = 0.03) were lower in the combined (oral + topical) group compared to the topical group.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the different methods of TXA administration, the combined use of oral and topical TXA is a safe, efficient and low-cost method in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates after TKA.

Effectiveness and Safety of Fixed-Dose Tranexamic Acid in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to greater blood loss and higher risk of venous thromboembolism. The effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in simultaneous bilateral TKAs have not been clearly defined. We presumed that a fixed dose of TXA may be a preferable alternative for ease of administration in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKAs.

METHODS

We prospectively randomized 120 primary simultaneous bilateral TKAs to a fixed dose of TXA or equivalent volume of normal saline intravenously. The primary outcome measure was total blood loss. The secondary outcome measures were blood transfusion rate, transfusion units, intraoperative blood loss, drainage volumes, hidden blood loss, maximum decline of hemoglobin, and postoperative suprapatellar girth increment.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant lower total blood loss, blood transfusion rate, drainage volumes, transfusion units, and maximum decline of hemoglobin in the TXA group than in the control group (P < .05), without increasing incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic venous thromboembolism. However, TXA did not significantly reduce the hidden blood loss (P = .123). No differences were observed in suprapatellar girth increments between both groups on postoperative day 5 and week 6 (P = .251 and .299).

CONCLUSION

Fixed dose of TXA for patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKAs was effective and safe in reducing total blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion needs without any additional thromboembolic risk. However, TXA administered intravenously did not significantly reduce the hidden blood loss.

Multiple Boluses of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Hidden Blood Loss After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Tourniquet: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal dosage and timing of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are undetermined. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of multiple boluses of intravenous TXA on hidden blood loss (HBL), inflammatory response, and knee function after primary TKA without tourniquet.

METHODS

A total of 151 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups to receive single bolus of 20 mg/kg IV-TXA before skin incision (group A), or another bolus of 10 mg/kg IV-TXA 3 hours later (group B), or another 2 boluses of 10 mg/kg IV-TXA 3 hours and 6 hours later (group C). TKAs without tourniquet were operated by 1 single surgeon. The primary outcomes were HBL and maximum hemoglobin drop. Other outcome measurements such as total blood loss, transfusion rate, inflammation markers (C-reactive protein, interleukin 6), visual analog scale pain score, limb swelling ratio, Hospital for Surgery Score, range of motion, length of hospital stay (LOH), and deep venous thrombosis were also compared.

RESULTS

The mean HBL and maximum Hb drop in group C (467.6 ± 305.9 and 20.9 ± 9.3) was lower than those in group A (763.0 ± 373.3, P < .001; 28.7 ± 12.2, P < .001) and group B (637.5 ± 303.5, P = .010; 25.2 ± 8.4, P = .036). However, such differences were not detected between groups A and B (P = .058 and P = .080, respectively). The mean value of total blood loss in the groups A, B, and C were 967.2 ± 380.1, 803.7 ± 321.8, and 677.6 ± 326.0 mL, respectively, with a significant intergroup difference (P < .001). The mean serum level of C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 in group C were lower than those in group A and group B on postoperative days 1 and 2. The visual analog scale pain score and swelling ratio were also lower in group C than in the other 2 groups with statistical significance on POD 1-3. Moreover, the Hospital for Surgery Score, range of motion, and LOH were better in group C. No episodes of transfusion or deep venous thrombosis had occurred.

CONCLUSION

Multiple boluses of IV-TXA can effectively reduce HBL after primary TKA without tourniquet. What is the most important is that, by adding another bolus of IV-TXA, patients can gain a smaller decline of Hb, less postoperative inflammatory response, less pain, less knee swelling, better knee function, and shorter LOH.

The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Same Efficacy at Lower Cost?

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic antifibrinolytic agent successfully used intravenously (IV) to reduce blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). An oral formulation of the medication is available, at a fraction of the cost of the IV preparation. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to determine if oral TXA is equivalent to IV TXA in reducing blood loss in TKA.

METHODS

In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, patients undergoing primary TKA were randomized to receive 1.95g of TXA orally 2 hours preoperatively or 1g IV bolus before wound closure. The primary outcome was reduction of hemoglobin. Power analysis determined that 30 patients were required in each group. Equivalence analysis was performed with pooled and Satterthwaite t tests with a P-value of <.05 suggesting equivalence between treatments.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients received oral TXA and 37 patients received IV TXA. There was no difference in the mean reduction of hemoglobin between oral and IV groups (3.45g/dL vs 3.31g/dL, respectively; P = .001, equivalence), and total blood loss was equivalent at 1281 mL vs 1231 mL, respectively (P = .02, equivalence). One patient in each group was transfused.

CONCLUSION

Oral TXA provides equivalent reductions in blood loss, at a cost of $14 compared with $47-$108 depending on the IV formulation selected. As approximately 700,000 primary TKA are performed in the United States annually, a switch to oral TXA could yield total cost savings of between $23 million and $67 million dollars per year for our health care system.

The effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid in bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) for the treatment of blood loss after a bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Patients prepared for bilateral TKA and intervention including TXA versus placebo were comprehensively retrieved from MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from the time of the establishment of these databases to January 2016. The outcomes were all calculated by Stata 12.0 software. The continuous endpoints (total blood loss and blood loss in drainage) were calculated as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Binary variables (the need for transfusion, and the occurrence of deep venous thrombosis [DVT]) were calculated as relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Pooled results revealed that treatment with TXA associated with less need for transfusion (P = 0.000) and the value of Hb drop postoperatively (P = 0.290) after bilateral TKA. The results also indicated that TXA can decrease the total blood loss and blood loss in drainage after bilateral TKA (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, TXA can decrease the blood units transfused per patient by 1.23 U (P = 0.001). There is no statistically significant difference in terms of the occurrence of DVT between the 2 groups (P = 0.461).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current evidence, TXA can decrease the need for transfusion and the total blood loss without increasing the occurrence of DVT, and its administration is recommended routinely in bilateral TKA.

Tranexamic acid reduces the blood loss and blood transfusion requirements following peri-acetabular osteotomy

We have investigated the effect of using tranexamic acid (TXA) during peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) on peri-operative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements. In addition we analysed whether the use of TXA was associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following this procedure. A consecutive series of 96 PAOs, performed by a single surgeon, were reviewed. A total of 48 patients received TXA and 48 did not. The TXA group received a continuous infusion of TXA at a rate of 10 mg/kg/h. The primary outcome measure was the requirement for blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes included total blood loss, the decrease in the level of haemoglobin in the blood, the length of hospital stay, and the complications of this treatment. The mean rate of transfusion was significantly lower in the TXA group (62.5% vs 12.5%, p < 0.001). The mean blood loss was also significantly reduced in the TXA group (1.9 L (standard deviation (SD) 0.9) vs 1.5 L (SD 0.7), p < 0.01). No post-operative episodes of VTE were identified in either group. The use of TXA reduced the blood loss and the rate of transfusion after PAO significantly, without adverse effects such as an increased rate of VTE.

Intravenous versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: A double-blinded randomised controlled noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the proven efficacy of both intravenous (IV) and intra-articular (IA) tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing blood loss during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the ideal route of administration remained debatable. This study aimed to compare the effect of IV versus IA TXA on transfusion incidences, perioperative blood loss and postoperative lower limb swelling during TKA.

METHODS

One hundred patients were prospectively randomised into two groups: 1) IV TXA; and 2) IA TXA. In both groups, TXA was administered intraoperatively after cementing the prostheses. The perioperative blood loss was calculated using the haemoglobin balance method. The thigh, suprapatellar, and calf girths were measured preoperatively and on postoperative day (POD) 4.

RESULTS

Two patients in the IV group and one patient in the IA group required blood transfusion (p=0.500). The median and interquartile range (IQR) of perioperative blood loss on POD1 and POD4 was 530 (IQR 386,704) and 730 (IQR 523,925) ml for the IV group, compared with 613 (IQR 506,703) and 799 (IQR 563,1067) ml for the IA group (p=0.090 and p=0.232 respectively). The median increment in thigh, suprapatellar, and calf girths were 1.5 (IQR 0, 3.0), 2.0 (IQR 0.5, 4.0) and 0 (IQR 0, 1.0) cm for the IV group, compared to 2.0 (IQR 1.0, 4.0), 2.0 (IQR 0, 4.5) and 0 (IQR 0, 1.5) cm for the IA group (p=0.246, p=0.562, and p=0.937 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both IV and IA TXA had comparable effect on transfusion incidences, perioperative blood loss, and postoperative lower limb swelling during TKA. IA TXA is an alternative to IV TXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Tranexamic Acid in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Perioperative blood loss is a significant concern for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. A growing body of evidence has shown tranexamic acid (TXA) to be effective in decreasing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in both primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty. TXA is a synthetic drug that limits blood loss through inhibition of fibrinolysis and clot degradation. Both topical and intravenous administration of TXA, in a variety of dosing regimens, has proven effective. Further investigation is required to determine the optimal dose and dosing regimens; however, evidence exists to recommend an initial intravenous dose be given before beginning the procedure, with at least one additional intravenous dose administered postoperatively. Additionally, topical TXA doses >2 g appear to be more efficacious than lower doses. Finally, relatively few adverse reactions have been reported in arthroplasty patients, and no study to date has demonstrated an increased risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolic events in this patient population.

Venous thromboembolism and mortality associated with tranexamic acid use during total hip and knee arthroplasty

TKA and THA are associated with blood transfusion and risk for postoperative venothromboembolism (VTE). Reports show that tranexamic acid (TA) may be safe to use in high-risk orthopedic patients, but further data are needed to substantiate its use. All patients who underwent primary or revision TKA or THA in a five year period were retrospectively identified. In 13,262 elective TKA or THA procedures, neither the odds of VTE (OR=0.98; 95% CI 0.67-1.45; P=0.939) or adjusted odds of death (OR=0.26; 95% CI 0.04-1.80; P=0.171) were significant with TA administration. The major findings of this large, single center, retrospective cohort study show the odds of postoperative VTE and 30-day mortality were unchanged with TA administration.