Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?

Comparing patient outcomes following outpatient total joint arthroplasty in a hospital setting versus an ambulatory surgery center

Background

Traditionally, total joint arthroplasty has been performed as an inpatient procedure, sometimes requiring a hospital stay of a few days. However, outpatient total joints have gained popularity in recent years. The purpose of this study is to compare patient outcomes following an outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or a total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a hospital setting versus an ambulatory surgical center.

Method

This study was a prospective study of patients receiving either a TKA or THA, with results up to one year. All cases were performed by one board certified orthopedic surgeon. Each of the patients routinely completed patient reported outcome measures at the preoperative and postoperative visits for up to one year postoperatively.

Results

At three-month follow-up, there were no observed differences in the PROMIS, KOOS Jr, HOOS Jr, Oxford Hip, Oxford Knee, or mHHS scores between the cohorts. At one-year follow-up, there were no statistical differences in any PROMs between the ASC and hospital cohorts. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed comparing PROMs between patient's based on specific subgroups: diabetics, BMI >30, BMI<30, gender, and age, which showed non-statitistical differences at one year.

Conclusion

We believe that this study confirms that same day discharge, outpatient total joint procedures can be performed safely and effectively from either the hospital or ASC setting. While there were some differences in perceived outcomes at 3-months for some subgroups, these were not statistically significant at the 1-year after follow-up.

Hospital and Patient Factors Associated With Length of Hospitalization in Patients Who Have Osteoarthritis Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of National Data

BACKGROUND

By 2040, an estimated 3.5 million primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are expected to be performed annually in the United States. Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common indication for primary TKA. We examined the association of hospital, regional, and patient-level factors with extended lengths of hospital stay (eLOS).

METHODS

We studied patients who have OA who underwent primary TKA from 2016 to 2019 using a national inpatient database. We used the International Classification of Diseases codes to identify diagnoses and procedures. There were 2,592,469 patients who had OA who underwent primary TKA from 2016 to 2019. We used univariate and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses to assess whether patient, payer, hospital, and geographic factors were associated with an eLOS. Predictive probabilities from multivariable analyses were used to estimate the area under the curve.

RESULTS

Patient race and ethnicity, Medicaid or Medicare payer status, income, age/sex, and nearly all regional and hospital characteristics were independently associated with eLOS (>3 days; receiver-operating characteristic C-statistic = 0.74). Sensitivity analyses that used the most recent years of data from 2020 to 2021 (COVID-19 pandemic years) or adjusted for individual organ system complications reproduced the main results without much attenuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, sex, race, ethnicity, hospital location and teaching status, elective procedure designation, perioperative complications, and insurance payer status significantly influenced the LOS for primary TKA hospitalizations in the United States. Recognized disparities were linked to longer hospital stays after primary TKA in patients who had OA. Implementing policies and interventions that target these factors could help shorten hospital stays for high-risk patients after primary TKA.

Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty in the "Unhealthy": Staying Safe Using Institutional Protocols

BACKGROUND

Recent expansion in the indications for outpatient total joint arthroplasty has led to debates over patient selection. The purpose of this study was to compare early clinical outcomes and complications of same-day discharge (SDD) hip and knee arthroplasties from a high-volume institution based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were reviewed for all SDD primary joint arthroplasties between January 2013 and August 2023. There were 8 surgeons who performed 7,258 cases at hospital outpatient (n = 4,288) or ambulatory surgery centers (n = 2,970). This included 3,239 total hip arthroplasties, 1,503 total knee arthroplasties, and 2,516 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. The ASA 1 group comprised 506 subjects, compared to 5,005 for ASA 2 and 1,736 for ASA 3. The primary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, complications, and revisions within 24 hours and 90 days of surgery. The ASA 3 group was older (ASA 1 = 55 versus ASA 2 = 63 versus ASA 3 = 66 years; P < .01) and had a higher body mass index (ASA 1 = 25.4 versus ASA 2 = 28.5 versus ASA 3 = 32.7; P < .01).

RESULTS

There were no differences between ASA groups in joint-related ED visits, readmissions, and complications within 24 h and 90 days of surgery (P > .05). Subjects in the ASA 3 group experienced greater 90-day revisions compared to the other groups (ASA 1 = 1 of 506, 0.2% versus ASA 2 = 15 of 5,005, 0.3% versus ASA 3 = 15 of 1,736, 0.9%; P = .01). Regarding systemic events, ASA 1 subjects experienced significantly greater 24-hour complications (8 of 506, 1.6%) and ED visits (5 of 506, 1.0%), and the ASA 3 subjects had a higher incidence of 90-day readmissions (19 of 1,736, 1.1%) compared to the other groups (P < .05). Within 24 hours of discharge, urinary retention and syncope were the most frequent complications that required additional health care utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Medically optimized patients categorized as ASA 3 can safely undergo SDD hip and knee arthroplasty without increased risk of 24-hour or 90-day complications. Patient preference for outpatient care, reliable social support, and independent functional status are imperative for a successful outpatient program.

Perioperative Femur Fractures in muscle sparing anterolateral - Modified Watson-Jones approach to primary total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Periprosthetic femur fractures (PFF) are a rare early complication in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) that may result in revision and burden the healthcare system. A previous study identified a PFF rate of 8.3 % at 90 days with the modified anterolateral Watson-Jones (AL) approach to THA. This study assesses the PFF rate and risk factors with this approach at 90 days and 1-year post-operative follow-up.

Methods

580 primary THAs performed using the AL approach were retrospectively reviewed for risk factors associated with perioperative PFF including demographics, intra-operative and postoperative factors, and disposition.

Results

507 included patients had a 90-day PFF rate of 1.6 % (n = 8): 6 intraoperative (1.2 %), and 2 postoperative (0.4 %), significantly lower than previously reported (p < 0.001). 1 additional postoperative PFF fracture was operatively managed with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) on day 302; 1-year PFF rate was 2.5 %. All fractures healed uneventfully after treatment. The 1-year return to operating room rate for PFF was 0.3 %. Patients with PFF were significantly older (p = 0.036) compared to non-PFF patients. Implant type significantly predicted PFF.

Conclusion

The rarity of PFF among our cohort highlights the efficacy of the AL approach to avoid this complication.

Risk Factors of Failure to Discharge Before "Two Midnights" in Outpatient-Designated Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient-only list but continued to classify admissions as inpatient if they include two midnights, complicating care if an outpatient THA requires extended hospitalization. This study evaluates risk factors of patients undergoing outpatient-designated THA with a length of stay (LOS) ≥ 2 days.

METHODS

A total of 17,063 THA procedures designated as outpatient in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2015 and 2020 were stratified by LOS < 2 days (n = 2,294, 13.4%) and LOS ≥ 2 days (n = 14,765, 86.6%). Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared by univariate analysis. Multivariable regression analysis identified predictors of LOS ≥ 2 days.

RESULTS

Outpatients with extended LOS were older (mean 65.3 vs. 63.5 years; P < 0.01); were more likely to have body mass index (BMI) > 35 (24.0 vs. 17.8%; P < 0.01); and had higher incidences of smoking (15.1% vs. 10.3%; P < 0.01), diabetes (15.4% vs. 9.9%; P < 0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.4% vs. 2.3%; P < 0.01), and hypertension (57.6% vs. 49.2%; P < 0.01). Patients with LOS ≥ 2 days had a higher incidence of surgical site infection ( P < 0.01), hospital readmission ( P < 0.01), and revision surgery ( P < 0.01) over 30 days. Multivariable analysis demonstrated advanced age, female sex, African American race, Hispanic ethnicity, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension were independent risk factors for LOS ≥ 2 days.

CONCLUSION

Despite removal from the inpatient-only list, a subset of outpatient THA remains at risk of an extended LOS. This study informs surgeons on the relevant risk factors of extended stay, enabling early inpatient preauthorization.

Trends in inpatient versus outpatient upper extremity fracture surgery from 2008 to 2021 and their implications for equitable access: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to describe trends in inpatient and outpatient upper extremity fracture surgery between 2008 and 2021, along with identifying patient factors (age, sex, race, socioeconomic status) associated with outpatient surgery.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 12,593 adult patients who underwent upper extremity fracture repair from 2008 to 2021 at one of five urban hospitals in the Northeastern USA were identified. Using Distressed Communities Index (DCI), patients were divided into five quintiles based on their level of socioeconomic distress. Multivariable logistic regression was performed on patients from 2008 to 2019 to identify independent factors associated with outpatient management.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2019, outpatient procedures saw an average increase of 31%. The largest increases in the outpatient management were seen in humerus (132%) and forearm fractures (127%). Carpal and hand surgeries had the lowest percent increase of 8.1%. Clavicle and wrist fractures were independently associated with outpatient management. Older age, male sex, higher Elixhauser comorbidity index, DCI scores in the 4th or 5th quintile, and fractures of the scapula, humerus, elbow, and forearm were associated with inpatient management. During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decrease in outpatient procedures.

CONCLUSION

There is a shift toward outpatient surgical management of upper extremity fractures from 2008 to 2021. Application of our findings can serve as an institutional guide to allocate patients to appropriate surgical settings. Moreover, physicians and institutions should be aware of the potential socioeconomic disparities and implement plans to allow for equal access to care.

A Proposed Patient Selection Algorithm for Total Joint Arthroplasty Same-Day Discharge From an Ambulatory Surgery Center

BACKGROUND

Identifying appropriate patients for same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is critical for maintaining optimal patient safety and outcomes. This study investigated patient outcomes after SDD TJA at a single ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and proposes a TJA patient-selection algorithm based on findings and existing literature.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 660 patients was performed between July 2019 and October 2021 for all patients who underwent primary TJA in a single ASC. Successful SDD, length of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, and readmission events were recorded for each patient. There were 20 total complications in 331 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) (6.0%) and 15 total complications in 329 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) (4.6%).

RESULTS

There was one direct admission to the hospital in TKA patients and four direct admissions in THA patients, making the successful SDD rate 99.7% in TKAs, 98.8% in THAs, and 99.2% overall. In the TKA cohort, body mass index was associated with total complications (r = -0.15, P = 0.006); comorbidities with wound complications (P = 0.006); and EBL was with readmissions (r = 0.30, P < 0.001), revision surgery (r = 0.12, P = 0.04), and total complications (r = 0.16, P = 0.03). In the THA cohort, body mass index was weakly associated with wound complications (r = -0.12, P = 0.02), EBL was with emergency department visits (r = 0.18, P = 0.002) and total complications (r = 0.14, P = 0.01). However, there was no direct association between any of the analyzed characteristics and direct admission.

CONCLUSIONS

In our ASC cohort, patients had low rates of perioperative complications and hospital admissions, supporting the safety of SDD TJA using our proposed evidence-based algorithm to guide patient selection for SDD.

Advanced Concepts in Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty

As the adoption and utilization of outpatient total joint arthroplasty continues to grow, key developments have enabled surgeons to safely and effectively perform these surgeries while increasing patient satisfaction and operating room efficiency. Here, the authors will discuss the evidence-based principles that have guided this paradigm shift in joint arthroplasty surgery, as well as practical methods for selecting appropriate candidates and optimizing perioperative care. There will be 5 core efficiency principles reviewed that can be used to improve organizational management, streamline workflow, and overcome barriers in the ambulatory surgery center. Finally, future directions in outpatient surgery at the ASC, including the merits of implementing robot assistance and computer navigation, as well as expanding indications for revision surgeries, will be debated.

Local Infiltration Analgesia Is Superior to Regional Nerve Blocks for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Less Falls, Better Mobility, and Same-Day Discharge

Background: Multimodal analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides better pain control, mobility, and reduced side effects compared to monotherapies. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and regional nerve blocks (RNBs) are commonly used throughout these protocols. This study aimed to compare these procedures as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol for patients undergoing THA. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 1100 consecutive elective primary THAs was performed in 996 patients between June 2018 and December 2021. The RNB consisted of a preoperative continuous femoral nerve catheter and single-shot obturator nerve block, and LIA consisted of the intraoperative infiltration of weight-based bupivacaine. Results: A total of 579 (52.6%) patients received RNB, and 521 (47.4%) received LIA. Mean oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) during the first four hours postoperatively were significantly lower for LIA group (p < 0.001). However, the numeric pain rating scale in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was similar between groups. Patients with LIA had significantly greater first ambulation distance in the PACU (p < 0.001), higher successful same-day discharge rate (p = 0.029), fewer falls (p = 0.041), and less refill OMEs post-discharge (p < 0.001) than RNB. Conclusions: In the setting of similar pain management between groups and better functional outcomes for LIA, the use of minimally invasive procedures like LIA for pain control following THA is favorable.

The Effect of the COVID Pandemic on the Rate of Same-Day Discharge in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge (SDD) following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) started increasing prior to 2020. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in the rate of SDD after the pandemic and determine whether those changes became permanent.

METHODS

The annual rate of SDD for 15,208 primary THA and TKA cases performed between January 1, 2015, and September 9, 2022, at a single institution was determined. We also examined changes in SDD patient demographics as well as differences in the 90-day complication rates of SDD and overnight patients.

RESULTS

In 2015, the rate of SDD for primary arthroplasty was 24%, which grew annually to 29% in 2019. Postpandemic, the rate of SDD jumped above 50% and continued up to 64% by 2022. The biggest increase was in TKA, which went from under 10% SDD prepandemic to 50% by 2022. The average age and body mass index of SDD cases prepandemic increased significantly to 62 ± 9 years and 29.4 ± 5.3 (P < .01). Overnight patients had higher rates of 90-day postoperative complications (8.4 versus 4.2%, P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The pandemic caused major changes in the rate of SDD for primary THA and TKA, increasing in subsequent years. The SDD patients became older and heavier due to the expanded criteria for SDD cases. The 90-day postoperative complication rate was lower for SDD patients since higher risk patients were kept overnight. At the prepandemic rate, 29% of patients currently being sent home would have stayed overnight.

Patient Satisfaction and Experience with Same-Day Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Mixed-Methods study

INTRODUCTION

Same-day discharge (SDD) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a safe and effective healthcare pathway. However, there is limited understanding of the patient perspective on SDD. The aim of this study was to explore patient satisfaction and experience with SDD after RYGB.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study with a concurrent design was conducted in a Dutch teaching hospital, using questionnaires and interviews. Patients who underwent RYGB and were discharged on the day of the surgery completed four questionnaires of the BODY-Q (satisfaction with the surgeon, satisfaction with the medical team, satisfaction with the office staff, and satisfaction with information provision) ± 4 months postoperative. The results of the questionnaires were compared with pre-existing data from a cohort of patients who stayed overnight after surgery (i.e., control group). A subset of patients was individually interviewed for an in-depth understanding of the patient perspective on SDD.

RESULTS

In the questionnaires, median scores for the control group (n = 158) versus the present group of patients (n = 51) were as follows: 92/100 vs. 92/100 (p = 0.331) for the surgeon, 100/100 vs. 92/100 (p = 0.775) for the medical team, 100/100 vs. 100/100 (p = 0.616) for the office staff, and 90/100 vs. 73/100 (p = 0.015) for information provision. Interviews with 14 patients revealed seven themes, describing high satisfaction, along with several points of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction with SDD after RYGB is high, although information provision regarding the day of surgery could be improved. However, not every medically eligible patient might be suitable for this healthcare pathway, as responsibilities are shifted.

Causes and risk factors for same-day discharge failure after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

In recent decades, the trend toward early same-day discharge (SDD) after surgery has dramatically increased. Efforts to develop adequate risk stratification tools to guide decision-making regarding SDD versus prolonged hospitalization after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain largely incomplete. The purpose of this report is to identify the most frequent causes and risk factors associated with SDD failure in patients undergoing THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines of four bibliographic databases was conducted for comparative studies between patients who were successfully discharged on the same day and those who failed. Outcomes of interests were causes and risk factors associated with same-day discharge failure. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous variables, whereas mean differences (MD) were calculated for continuous variables. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software. Random effects were used if there was evidence of heterogeneity. Eight studies with 3492 patients were included. The most common cause of SDD failure was orthostatic hypotension, followed by inadequate physical condition, nausea/vomiting, pain, and urinary retention. Female sex was a risk factor for failure (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93), especially in the THA subgroup. ASA score IV (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.76) and III (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99) were risk factors, as were having > 2 allergies and smoking patients. General anesthesia increased failure risk (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.80), while spinal anesthesia was protective (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.17-2.24). The direct anterior and posterior approaches showed no significant differences. In conclusion, orthostatic hypotension was the primary cause of SDD failure. Risk factors identified for SDD failure in orthopedic surgery include female sex, ASA III and IV classifications, a higher number of allergies, smoking patients and the use of general anesthesia. These factors can be addressed to enhance SDD outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty at an Ambulatory Surgery Center Versus a Hospital-Based Center

INTRODUCTION

The utilization of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and same-day discharge (SDD) from hospital-based centers (HBCs) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to increase. There remains a paucity of literature directly comparing patient-reported outcomes by surgery site. We sought to compare outcomes between patients undergoing THA at an ASC versus HBC while controlling for medical comorbidities.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary THA with SDD (postoperative day 0) from a single HBC (1,015 patients) or stand-alone ASC (170 patients) from December 2020 to 2021 were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day complications were collected. Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS JR), VR-12, and procedural satisfaction scores were collected preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients were matched by age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Chi-squared analysis was conducted to compare categorical variables, and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Linear regression models were conducted considering age, sex, and presence of comorbidities.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing THA at an ASC had markedly higher VR-12 Physical Component Scores at all time points and improved VR-12 Mental Component Scores at preoperative visit and 6 months. These patients had increased procedural satisfaction at 3 months, although there was no difference at 1 year. No notable difference was observed in 90-day complication rates between groups. After matching by age and ASA, each group had 170 patients. In the matched analysis, preoperative HOOS JR scores were markedly lower in the HBC group. However, there was no notable difference in HOOS JR scores, change in HOOS JR scores, and procedural satisfaction, at any postoperative time point.

CONCLUSIONS

No notable difference was observed in patient-reported outcomes at any time point for SDD after THA performed at an ASC or an HBC when controlling for age and comorbidities. This study suggests noninferiority of stand-alone ASCs for outpatient THA, regarding patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes.

Does the Timed-Up-and-Go Test Predict Length of Stay After Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Study

Background

The prevalence of ambulatory total hip arthroplasty (THA) is rising, but it is not appropriate for all patients. Preoperative patient selection considers medical and social factors but overlooks patients' prior level of physical function.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate if preoperative physical function, measured by the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test, is associated with length of stay (LOS) in patients who underwent primary THA.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed using 396 patients who underwent primary THA within a 2-month period at a single institution. Regression analysis evaluated the relationship between preoperative TUG scores and hospital LOS. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to identify a cutoff TUG score associated with LOS longer than 24 hours.

Results

Univariate regression analysis of those discharged in less than 24 hours and those discharged in more than 24 hours found lower TUG scores (10.7 vs 13.7, respectively) were associated with patient discharge within 24 hours. Multivariate regression analysis showed a higher TUG score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.99) was associated with decreased odds of discharge within 24 hours. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed on the entire study cohort and the ambulatory surgery group and identified TUG scores of 10.3 and 10.5 seconds, respectively, associated with LOS of less than 24 hours (OR full cohort: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.94-4.71; OR ambulatory surgery: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.90-4.60). Sensitivity and specificity were not sufficient to support the use of these cutoff scores alone in predicting LOS.

Conclusion

Although we were unable to establish a cutoff TUG score in patients who underwent primary THA that could determine LOS of more than 24 hours, the preoperative TUG score may be useful as a tool to aid in identifying patients who may require a longer hospital LOS. Further study is needed.

Same-Day Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2020: The Impact of the Medicare Inpatient Only List and the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Same-day total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to gain popularity in the United States. The present study sought to quantify recent same-day outpatient trends taking into consideration the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the removal of these procedures from the Medicare inpatient only (IPO) list.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary elective TKA and THA were identified using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and the National Inpatient Sample from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. The same-day cohort included Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample patients with a length of stay = 0 days. The inpatient cohort included patients with length of stay ≥1 day. National estimates were extrapolated using weight functions.

RESULTS

From January 2016 to December 2020, the proportion of same-day TKA increased from 1.2 (719) to 62.4% (31,293) and the proportion of same-day THA increased from 2.0 (599) to 54.5% (18,252). Following removal from the Medicare IPO list, same-day TKAs increased from 3.2% (1,895) in December 2017 to 13.8% (9,269) in January 2018, and same-day THAs increased from 10.7% (4,295) in December 2019 to 22.5% (8,708) in January 2020. Between February and March 2020, same-day TKAs increased from 42.4 (26,148) to 44.4% (16,972) and same-day THAs increased from 28.5 (10,729) to 30.2% (7,409).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of same-day TKA and THA dramatically increased following removal from the Medicare IPO list and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. By December 2020, same-day TKA and THA accounted for >50% of all cases performed in the United States.

Safety of Same-Day Discharge Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background

Joint replacement procedures have traditionally been performed in an inpatient setting to minimize complication rates. There is growing evidence that total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) can safely be performed as an outpatient procedure, with the potential benefits of decreased health care expenses and improved patient satisfaction. Prior studies have not reliably made a distinction between outpatient TAA defined as length of stay <1 day and same-day discharge. The purpose of our study was to compare a large volume of same-day discharge and inpatient TAA for safety and efficacy.

Methods

Patients undergoing TAA at our US-based institution are part of an institutional review board-approved registry. We queried the registry for TAA performed by the single highest-volume surgeon at our institution between May 2020 and March 2022. Same-day discharge TAA was defined as discharge on the day of the procedure. Patient demographics, baseline clinical variables, concomitant procedures, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Postoperative outcomes were compared after 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Multivariable models were created for comparison with the matched cohort outcome comparison analysis.

Results

Our same-day discharge group was younger (median 58 vs 67 years; P < .001), with proportionally fewer females (36.4% vs 51.4%; P = .044) and lower Charlson Comorbidity Indices (median 1 vs 3; P < .001) than the inpatient group. At a median follow-up of 1 year, after matching by age, sex, CCI, and ASA score, there was no difference in complications (P = .788), reoperations (P = .999), revisions (P = .118), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores between the 2 groups. Multivariable analyses performed demonstrated no evidence of association between undergoing same-day discharge TAA vs inpatient TAA and reoperation, revision, complication, or 1-year PROMIS scores (P > .05).

Conclusion

In our system of health care, with appropriate patient selection, same-day discharge following TAA can be a safe alternative to inpatient TAA.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Comparison of the Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Lumbar Fusion : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to synthesize the early data regarding and analyze the safety profile of outpatient lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Performing lumbar fusion in an outpatient or ambulatory setting is becoming an increasingly employed strategy to provide effective value-based care. As this is an emerging option for surgeons to employ in their practices, the data is still in its infancy.

METHODS

This study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that described outcomes of inpatient and outpatient lumbar fusion cohorts were searched from PubMed, Medline, The Cochrane Library, and Embase. Rates of individual medical and surgical complications, readmission, and reoperation were collected when applicable. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were additionally collected if reported. Individual pooled comparative meta-analysis was performed for outcomes of medical complications, surgical complications, readmission, and reoperation. PROMs were reviewed and qualitatively reported.

RESULTS

The search yielded 14 publications that compared outpatient and inpatient cohorts with a total of 75,627 patients. Odds of readmission demonstrated no significant difference between outpatient and inpatient cohorts [OR=0.94 (0.81-1.11)]. Revision surgery similarly was no different between the cohorts [OR=0.81 (0.57-1.15)]. Pooled medical and surgical complications demonstrated significantly decreased odds for outpatient cohorts compared with inpatient cohorts [OR=0.58 (0.34-0.50), OR=0.41 (0.50-0.68), respectively]. PROM measures were largely the same between the cohorts when reported, with few studies showing better ODI and VAS Leg outcomes among outpatient cohorts compared with inpatient cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary data regarding the safety of outpatient lumbar fusion demonstrates a favorable safety profile in appropriately selected patients, with PROMs remaining comparable in this setting. There is no data in the form of prospective and randomized trials which is necessary to definitively change practice.

Older Age, Male Sex, and Early Start Time Lengthen the Recovery Room Stay Following Total Joint Arthroplasty in an Ambulatory Surgical Center

Background

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) performed in the ambulatory surgical center (ASC) has been shown to be safe and cost-effective for an expanding cohort of patients. As criteria for TJA in the ASC become less restrictive, data guiding the efficient use of ASC resources are crucial.

Purpose

We sought to identify factors associated with length of stay in the recovery room after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed in the ASC.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 411 patients who underwent primary THA or TKA at our institution's ASC between November 2020 and March 2022. We collected patient demographics, perioperative factors, success of same-day discharge (SDD), and length of time in the recovery room.

Results

Of 411 patients, 100% had successful SDD. The average length of time spent in recovery was 207 minutes (SD: 73.9 minutes). Predictors of longer time in recovery were increased age, male sex, and operative start time before 9:59 am. Body mass index, preoperative opioid use, Charlson Comorbidity Index, type of surgery (THA vs TKA), urinary retention risk, and type of anesthesia (spinal vs general) were not significant predictors of length of time in the recovery room.

Conclusion

In this retrospective study, factors associated with increased length of time in the recovery room included older age, male sex, and operative start time before 9:59 am. Such factors may guide surgeons in determining the optimal order of cases for each day at the ASC, but further prospective studies should seek to confirm these observations.

Increasing the Volume of Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty Procedures: An Evaluation of a Novel Rapid Recovery Pathway Program Within an Academic Medical Center

Background

There has been a national trend toward shifting joint arthroplasty procedures to the outpatient setting. These cases are often performed in freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), which are often not accessible to surgeons within academic practices.

Purposes

We sought to investigate a novel rapid recovery program used to transition arthroplasty patients to an outpatient-based care system within an academic medical center.

Methods

All patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty between November 2019 and April 2021 were retrospectively evaluated for their eligibility for a rapid recovery pathway through the Extended Stay Unit (ESU) based on clinical and social criteria. Once admitted, patients were evaluated for whether they were discharged from the unit or if hospital admission was necessary.

Results

Out of the 444 patients deemed candidates for the rapid recovery program, 188 patients were admitted to the ESU (42.3%); 18 (9.6%) required inpatient hospital admission, with the majority of these due to failing physical therapy (16; 88.9%). Of the ESU patients who were successfully discharged home, 55 (32.4%) were discharged on postoperative day (POD) 0 and 115 (67.6%) on POD 1 (<23 hours).

Conclusion

As total joint arthroplasties shift toward the outpatient setting, surgeons in academic institutions must employ strategies to increase their volume of patient candidates for outpatient procedures. Our retrospective study of prospectively collected data suggests the feasibility of creating a separate rapid recovery unit within the hospital that can be an effective method by which to eventually transition to the ASC setting.

Patient satisfaction analysis of robot-assisted minimally invasive adrenalectomy: a single-center retrospective study

The objective of this study is to compare the satisfaction of patients undergoing robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopy adrenalectomy under the ambulatory mode and conventional mode. Basic information and clinical data of patients who underwent robotic-assisted posterior laparoscopic adrenalectomy between June 2020 and June 2023 were queried from our case system. The Outpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey (OAS CAHPS®) was used to investigate patient satisfaction with preoperative preparation, discharge counseling, postoperative instructions, postoperative pain, and satisfaction with nursing work. The stats R package was used to select the appropriate statistic for the statistics based on the characteristics of the data. A total of 311 patients who underwent robot-assisted posterior laparoscopic adrenalectomy were enrolled in our case system. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, ASA classification, laterality, maximum tumor diameter, type of resection, hormonal activity, disease type, pathological classification, duration of surgery, estimated intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications and follow-up period that were compared between the two groups of patients. There were no significant differences in preoperative preparation score, discharge counseling score, postoperative guidance score and nursing care satisfaction score (P > 0.05). Postoperative hospitalization, peristalsis time, defecation time, time to first postoperative mobilization, duration of indwelling drain and hospitalization costs in patients in the ambulatory model group were significantly less than patients in the conventional model group (P < 0.001). Patients in the ambulatory model group had significantly higher postoperative pain relief scores than patients in the conventional model group. In conclusion, our data suggest that patient satisfaction is equal between the conventional and ambulatory mode of performing robotic-assisted adrenalectomy. Patient satisfaction was probably associated with shorter hospitalization days, adequate preoperative preparation and standardized, high-quality post-discharge information and guidance.

Safety of Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed in Patients 65 Years of Age and Older in an Ambulatory Surgery Center

Studies regarding the safety of same day discharge (SDD) in patients ≥65 years of age undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) are lacking. A retrospective review of 69 patients undergoing SDD following primary THA in 2 free-standing ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) was performed to evaluate for safety and complications. Sixty-six patients met SDD goals, while 1 patient required transport to a hospital for transfusion, and 2 patients underwent overnight observation in the ASC. This study reveals that with appropriate preoperative evaluation, patient selection, and education, THA in a free-standing ASC can be safely performed in patients ≥65 years of age.

Success of Same-Day Discharge Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Does Location Matter?

BACKGROUND

Same calendar day discharge (SCDD) following total joint arthroplasty is desirable for patients and surgeons alike. The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of SCDD in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) versus hospital setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 510 patients who underwent primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty over a 2-year period. The final cohort was divided into 2 groups based on location of surgery: ASC (N = 255) or hospital (N = 255). Groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and Charleston Comorbidity Index. Successes of SCDD, reasons for failure of SCDD, length of stay (LOS), and 90-day readmission and complication rates were recorded.

RESULTS

All SCDD failures were from the hospital setting (36 [65.6%] total knee arthroplasty [TKA] and 19 [34.5%] total hip arthroplasty [THA]). There were no failures from the ASC. The main causes of failed SCDD in both THA and TKA included failed physical therapy and urinary retention. Regarding THA, the ASC group had a significantly shorter total LOS (6.8 [4.4 to 11.6] versus 12.8 [4.7 to 58.0] hours, P < .001). Similarly, TKA patients had a shorter LOS in the ASC (6.9 [4.6 to 12.9] versus 16.9 [6.1 to 57.0], P < .001). Total 90-day readmission rates were higher in the ASC group (2.75% versus 0%), where all but 1 patient underwent TKA. Similarly, complication rates were higher in the ASC group (8.2% versus 2.75%), where all but 1 patient underwent TKA.

CONCLUSION

TJA performed in the ASC, compared to the hospital setting, allowed for reduced LOS and improved success of SCDD.

Fostering Excellence in Knee Arthroplasty: Developing Optimal Patient Care Pathways and Inspiring Knowledge Transfer of Advanced Surgical Techniques

Osteoarthritis of the knee is common. Early sports trauma or cartilage defects are risk factors for osteoarthritis. If conservative treatment fails, partial or total joint replacement is often performed. A joint replacement aims to restore physiological biomechanics and the quality of life of affected patients. Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most performed surgeries in musculoskeletal medicine. Several developments have taken place over the last decades that have truly altered the way we look at knee arthroplasty today. Some of the fascinating aspects will be presented and discussed in the present narrative review.

Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty From a Stand-Alone Surgery Center: Safe as the Hospital?

BACKGROUND

Literature suggests that outpatient arthroplasty may result in low rates of complications and readmissions. There is, however, a dearth of information on the relative safety of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed at stand-alone ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) versus hospital outpatient (HOP) settings. We aimed to compare safety profiles and 90-day adverse events of these 2 cohorts.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were reviewed on all patients who underwent outpatient TKA from 2015 to 2022. The ASC and HOP groups were compared, and differences in demographics, complications, reoperations, revisions, readmissions, and emergency department (ED) visits within 90 days of surgery were analyzed. There were 4 surgeons who performed 4,307 TKAs during the study period, including 740 outpatient cases (ASC = 157; HOP = 583). The ASC patients were younger than HOP patients (ASC = 61 versus HOP = 65; P < .001). Body mass index and sex did not differ significantly between groups.

RESULTS

Within 90 days, 44 (6%) complications occurred. No differences were observed between groups in rates of 90-day complications (ASC = 9 of 157, 5.7% versus HOP = 35 of 583, 6.0%; P = .899), reoperations (ASC = 2 of 157, 1.3% versus HOP = 3 of 583, 0.5%; P = .303), revisions (ASC = 0 of 157 versus HOP = 3 of 583, 0.5%; P = 1), readmissions (ASC = 3 of 157, 1.9% versus HOP = 8 of 583, 1.4%; P = .625), and ED visits (ASC = 1 of 157, 0.6% versus HOP = 3 of 583, 0.5%; P = .853).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that in appropriately selected patients, outpatient TKA can be safely performed in both ASC and HOP settings with similar low rates of 90-day complications, reoperations, revisions, readmissions, and ED visits.

Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: Are We Closing the Racial Disparities Gap?

INTRODUCTION

As ne arly half of all total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures are projected to be performed in the outpatient setting by 2026, the impact of this trend on health disparities remains to be explored. This study investigated the racial/ethnic differences in the proportion of TJA performed as outpatient as well as the impact of outpatient surgery on 30-day complication and readmission rates.

METHODS

The ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent primary, elective total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) between 2011 and 2018. The proportion of TJA performed as an outpatient, 30-day complications, and 30-day readmission among African American, Hispanic, Asian, Native American/Alaskan, and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander patients were each compared to White patients (control group). Analyses were performed for each racial/ethnic group separately. A general linear model (GLM) was used to calculate the odds ratios for receiving TJA in an outpatient vs. inpatient setting while adjusting for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), functional status, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

In total, 170,722 THAs and 285,920 TKAs were analyzed. Compared to White patients, non-White patients had higher likelihood of THA or TKA performed as an outpatient (OR 1.31 and 1.24 respectively for African American patients, OR 1.65 and 1.76 respectively for Hispanic patients, and OR 1.66 and 1.59 respectively for Asian patients, p < 0.001). Outpatient surgery did not lead to increased complications in any of the study groups compared to inpatient surgery (p > 0.05). However, readmission rates were significantly higher for outpatient TKA in all the study groups compared to inpatient TKA (OR range 2.47-10.15, p < 0.001). Complication and readmission rates were similar between inpatient and outpatient THA for all the study groups.

CONCLUSION

While this study demonstrated higher proportion of TJA performed as an outpatient among most non-White racial/ethnic groups, this observation should be tempered with the increased readmission rates observed in outpatient TKA, which could further the disparities gap in health outcomes.

The Differential Effect of COVID on Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Hospital and Ambulatory Surgery Centers/Hospital Outpatient Departments: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Analysis

Background

Coronavirus disease (COVID) created unprecedented challenges, especially for high-volume elective subspecialties like total joint arthroplasty. Limited inpatient capacity and resource conservation led to new outpatient selection criteria and site of service changes. As a Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Quality Collaborative Initiative quality project, demographic changes, complications, and differential effects on inpatient vs outpatient centers pre- and post-COVID were analyzed.

Methods

The registry identified all total joint arthroplasty at hospitals and ASCs/HOPDs between 07/2019-12/2019 and 07/2020-12/2020. These intervals represented pre-COVID and post-COVID elective surgery shutdowns. Case volumes, demographics, and 90-day complications were compared.

Results

Comparing 2020 to 2019, hospital volumes decreased (-9% total hip arthroplasty [THA], -17% total knee arthroplasty [TKA]), and ambulatory surgery center (ASC)/hospital outpatient department (HOPD) increased (+84% THA, +125% TKA). Entering 2020, ASC/HOPD patients were older (P = .0031, P < .0001: THA, TKA), had more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (P = .0105, P = .0021), fewer attended joint class (P < .0001, P < .0001), and more hips were women (P = .023). Hospital patients had higher preoperative pain scores (P = .0117, P < .0001; THA, TKA), less joint education attendance (P < .0001, P < .0001), younger TKAs (P = .0169), and more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (0.0009). After propensity matching, there were no significant differences between site of service for 90-day fractures, deep vein thromboses or pulmonary embolisms, infection, or hip dislocations. Hospital THAs had higher readmissions (P = .0003) and TKAs had higher 30-day emergency department visits (P = .005). ASC/HOPD patients were prescribed higher oral morphine equivalents (P < .0001, P < .0001; THA, TKA).

Conclusions

COVID's elective surgery shutdown caused a dramatic site of service shift. Traditional preoperative education was negatively impacted, and older and sicker patients became outpatients. But short-term complications were not increased in ASCs/HOPDs. These site of service and associated patient demographic changes may be safely sustained.

Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty Shows Decreasing Complication Burden From 2010 to 2020

BACKGROUND

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed on an outpatient basis continues to increase. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates over the last decade to evaluate trends in the safety of outpatient TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TKA from 2010 to 2020 from a large administrative claims database were retrospectively identified and stratified based on the year of surgery. Propensity-score matching was performed to match patients who were discharged within 24 hours of surgery to inpatients based on age, sex, comorbidity index, and year of surgery. Linear regression analyses were used to compare trends from 2010 to 2020. The 90-day adverse events in the early cohort (2010-2012) were compared to those in the late cohort (2018-2020) using multivariable regression analyses. Of the 547,137 patients in the sample, 28,951 outpatients (5.3%) were propensity matched to inpatients.

RESULTS

The incidence of outpatient TKA increased from 2010 to 2018 (1.9 versus 13.8%, P < .001). Despite a similar complication rate early (24.1 versus 22.6%, P = .164), outpatient TKA had fewer complications at the end of the study period (13.7 versus 16.7%, P < .001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the risk of any complication after outpatient TKA was lower than inpatient from 2018 to 2020 (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications in both cohorts declined dramatically suggesting improvements in quality of care over time, with the greatest decline in patients undergoing outpatient surgery. These results suggest that outpatient TKA today is not higher risk for the patient than inpatient TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Assessing the Precision of Surgery Duration Estimation: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives

The operating room (OR) is considered the highest source of cost and earnings. Therefore, measuring OR efficiency, which means how time and resources are allocated precisely for their intended purposes in the operating room is crucial. Both overestimation and underestimation negatively impact OR efficiency Therefore, hospitals defined metrics to Measuring OR Effeciency. Many studies have discussed OR efficiency and how surgery scheduling accuracy plays a vital role in increasing OR efficiency. This study aims to evaluate OR efficiency using surgery duration accuracy.

Methods

This retrospective, quantitative study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City. We extracted data on 97,397 surgeries from 2017 to 2021 from the OR database. The accuracy of surgery duration was identified by calculating the duration of each surgery in minutes by subtracting the time of leaving the OR from the time of entering the OR. Based on the scheduled duration, the calculated durations were categorized as either underestimation or overestimation. Descriptive and bivariate analyses (Chi-square test) were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results

Sixty percent out of the 97,397 surgeries performed were overestimated compared to the time scheduled by the surgeons. Patient characteristics, surgical division, and anesthesia type showed statistically significant differences (p <0.05) in their OR estimation.

Conclusion

Significant proportion of procedures have overestimated. This finding provides insight into the need for improvement.

Recommendations

It is recommended to enhance the surgical scheduling method using machine learning (ML) models to include patient characteristics, department, anesthesia type, and even the performing surgeon increases the accuracy of duration estimation. Then, evaluate the performance of an ML model in future studies.

Utilization, Complications, and Costs of Inpatient versus Outpatient Total Elbow Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although total hip and knee arthroplasty have largely moved to the outpatient setting, total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains a predominantly inpatient procedure. Currently, evidence on the safety and potential cost savings of outpatient TEA is limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the costs and complications associated with performing TEA in the inpatient versus outpatient setting.

METHODS

We identified patients who received elective TEA using the Truven Health MarketScan database. Outcomes of interest were 90-day complication rate, readmission rate, and procedure costs in the inpatient and outpatient settings. We used propensity score matching and logistic regression analysis to assess how patient comorbidities and surgical setting influenced complications and readmission rates. The median cost per patient was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

We identified 307 outpatient and 414 inpatient TEA procedures over a 9-year period. Elixhauser comorbidity scores were higher for the inpatient cohort. The incidence of surgical complications was significantly higher in the inpatient than the outpatient cohort (27% vs 9%). The odds of 90-day readmissions were similar in the 2 groups (37% vs 25%). In terms of cost, the median inpatient TEA was more expensive than outpatient TEA ($26 817 vs $18 412). However, the median cost for occupational therapy within 90 days of surgery was higher for outpatient TEA patients ($687 vs $571).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that surgeons can consider a transition toward outpatient TEA for patients without significant comorbidities, as this will substantially reduce health care costs.

Hospital Revenue, Cost, and Contribution Margin in Inpatient Versus Outpatient Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Removal of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient-only list has financial implications for both patients and institutions. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare financial parameters between patients designated for inpatient versus outpatient total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who underwent TKA or THA after these procedures were removed from the inpatient-only list. Patients were statistical significance into cohorts based on inpatient or outpatient status, procedure type, and insurance type. This included 5,284 patients, of which 4,279 were designated inpatient while 1,005 were designated outpatient. Patient demographic, perioperative, and financial data including per patient revenues, total and direct costs, and contribution margins (CMs) were collected. Data were compared using t-tests and Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

Among Medicare patients receiving THA, CM was 89.1% lower for the inpatient cohort when compared to outpatient (P < .001), although there was no statistical significance difference between cohorts for TKA (P = .501). Among patients covered by Medicaid or Government-managed plans, CM was 120.8% higher for inpatients receiving THA (P < .001) when compared to outpatients and 136.3% higher for inpatients receiving TKA (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our analyses showed that recent costs associated with inpatient stay inconsistently match or outpace additional revenue, causing CM to vary drastically depending on insurance and procedure type. For Medicare patients receiving THA, inpatient surgery is financially disincentivized leaving this vulnerable patient population at a risk of losing access to care.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Online Crowdsourcing Survey of United States Population Preferences and Perceptions Regarding Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been shown to be both safe and cost-effective in appropriately selected patients and continues to expand substantially across the United States. Using online crowdsourcing, we aimed to assess population perceptions regarding outpatient TJA and to determine factors associated with preference for outpatient versus inpatient arthroplasty.

METHODS

A closed-ended survey consisting of 39 questions was administered to members of a public platform. Study participants responded to questions regarding demographic factors and outpatient TJA. Validated assessments to capture health literacy and engagement were also used. To determine factors associated with preference for outpatient TJA, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 900 participants completed the survey. After exclusion of surveys with incomplete data, 725 responses remained for analysis (80.6%). Over half (59.9%) of the survey participants would feel comfortable going home the same day of surgery following TJA. However, two-thirds (64.6%) would prefer to stay in the hospital following TJA. The majority (68.0%) of respondents perceive a hospital setting as the safest location for TJA. The 3 major concerns regarding outpatient TJA were cost, post-operative pain control, and post-operative complication. Among the 111 respondents (15.3%) who would prefer outpatient TJA, 45% would pay more out-of-pocket, 63.1% travel further, and 55.9% would be willing to wait longer to have their surgery performed as an outpatient. On multivariable regressions, those living in a suburban setting (adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals: 4.2 [1.3-2.7], P = .02) and >60 year old adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals: 8 [2-33.1], P = .004) were more likely to prefer outpatient TJA.

CONCLUSION

Despite the rise in outpatient TJA, the majority of the public appears to prefer inpatient TJA and the minority would expect to be discharged home the same day. Our data can be used to address specific patient concerns regarding outpatient TJA and set realistic expectations for hospital systems and ambulatory facilities.

Emerging Racial Disparities in Outpatient Utilization of Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities within the field of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have been extensively reported. To date, however, it remains unknown how these disparities have translated to the outpatient TJA (OP-TJA) setting. The purposes of this study were to compare relative OP-TJA utilization rates between White and Black patients from 2011-2019 and assess how these differences in utilization have evolved over time.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review from 2011-2019 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Differences in the relative utilization of OP (same-day discharge) versus inpatient TJA between White and Black patients were assessed and trended over time. Multivariable logistic regressions were run to adjust for baseline patient factors and comorbidities.

RESULTS

During the study period, Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo OP-TJA when compared to White patients (P < .001 for both outpatient total knee arthroplasty and outpatient total hip arthroplasty [OP-THA]). From 2011 to 2019, an emerging disparity was found in outpatient total knee arthroplasty and OP-THA utilization between White and Black patients (eg, White versus Black OP-THA: 0.4% versus 0.6% in 2011 compared with 10.2% versus 5.9% in 2019, P_trend < .001). These results held in all adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSION

In this study we found evidence of emerging and worsening racial disparities in the relative utilization of OP-TJA procedures between White and Black patients. These results highlight the need for early intervention by orthopaedic surgeons and policy makers alike to address these emerging inequalities in access to care before they become entrenched within our systems of orthopaedic care.

Perioperative Management in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Practice

Perioperative management for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty has evolved significantly over the years to reduce overt complications and improve patient outcomes. The groundwork for perioperative care encompasses initial patient selection and education strategies for achieving successful outcome. Multimodal pain management strategies have advanced patient care with the increased use of new regional/local anesthetics. In addition, complications resulting from blood loss and transfusions have been curtailed with the use of synthetic antifibrinolytic agents. It remains critical for shoulder arthroplasty surgeons to optimize patients during the perioperative period through various modalities to maximize functional progression, outcomes, and patient's satisfaction following shoulder arthroplasty.

Improved clinical outcomes of outpatient enhanced recovery hip and knee replacements in comparison to standard inpatient procedures: A study of patients who experienced both

BACKGROUND

The benefits of combining enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) interventions with an outpatient program for total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) are uncertain. This study's main objective was to evaluate adverse events with an ERAS-outpatient compared to standard-inpatient care and secondary objectives were to compare pain, functional recovery, PROMs and satisfaction.

HYPOTHESIS

The ERAS-outpatient program would result in reduced adverse events compared to standard-inpatient care.

METHODS

An ambidirectional single subject cohort study was conducted on 48 consecutive patients who experienced both a standard-inpatient and an ERAS-outpatient THA/TKA (contralaterally). Adverse event rate according to the Clavien-Dindo scale, the Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI) and the number of unplanned episodes of care were assessed. Postoperative pain on a numeric rating scale, opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents, functional recovery, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (WOMAC, KOOS, HOOS, Forgotten Joint Score and Patient Joint Perception) and patients' satisfaction were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Following the ERAS-outpatient surgery, complication rates were reduced by more than 50% (2.1 vs. 4.4, p<0.001), CCI was significantly lower (12.3 vs. 19.1, p<0.001), and similar unplanned episodes of care were observed (p>0.999). In the first 8 postoperative hours, perceived pain was similar (p>0.805) while opioid consumption was significantly reduced (9.3 vs. 26.5, p<0.001). Patients walked, climbed stairs, showered, performed activities of daily living, practised sports, went back to work sooner (p<0.001), but PROMs were similar between groups at the last follow-up (p>0.188). Patients were more satisfied of the ERAS-outpatient pathway and recommended it significantly more (p<0.002).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the conventional inpatient care, the ERAS-outpatient program proved to be safer, enable faster functional recovery, and improve patients' satisfaction which highlight the importance of following ERAS principles when implementing an outpatient THA/TKA program.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Ambidirectional Cohort study.

The Most Influential Publications in Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

Total joint replacements are some of the most common procedures performed by surgeons. There has been a recent increase to transition these procedures to the outpatient setting.

Objective

Our study seeks to identify the most influential publications, in terms of total citations, regarding outpatient total hip and knee replacement surgeries.

Methods

The database used to collect the data for this analysis was Clarivate Analytics Web of Science. The search query selected and used to collect data was: “outpatient or ambulatory,” with a “Title” filter AND “total joint replacement” AND “total joint arthroplast*” with “Topic” filters. The papers returned were then sorted by total number of citations and exported to Google Sheets for further analysis.

Results

The most cited publication was “Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique,” by Berger et al.. This was the oldest publication analyzed (2005), the most recent publication being published in 2020. The publications analyzed were cited a total number of 1,774 times and averaged 35.5 citations per year. The Journal with the most attributable publications was The Journal of Arthroplasty.

Conclusion

This study provides a measure of the most cited articles on outpatient arthroplasty. Most literature on the topic were categorized as Clinical Science and Outcomes (50%), comprised level of evidence III (28%), were published in the Journal of Arthroplasty (54%) and came out of the United States (76%). Knowledge of these most influential articles allows for a foundation of understanding on a rapidly growing area of arthroplasty among clinicians.

Outpatient total knee and hip arthroplasty present comparable and even better clinical outcomes than inpatient operation

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare total complications, complications stratified by type, readmissions, and reoperations at 30 and 90 days after outpatient and standard inpatient total knee and total hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA).

Methods

A literature search was conducted from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for articles published before 20 August 2021. The types of studies included prospective randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective comparative studies, retrospective reviews of THA and TKA registration databases, and observational case-control studies. Comparisons of interest included total complications, complications stratified by type, readmissions, and reoperations at 30 and 90 days. The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.

Results

Twenty studies with 582,790 cases compared relevant postoperative indicators of outpatient and inpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) (TKA and THA). There was a significant difference in the total complications at 30 days between outpatient and inpatient THA (p = 0.001), readmissions following TJA (p = 0.03), readmissions following THA (p = 0.001), stroke/cerebrovascular incidents following TJA (p = 0.01), cardiac arrest following TJA (p = 0.007), and blood transfusions following TJA (p = 0.003). The outcomes showed an obvious difference in 90-day total complications between outpatient and inpatient TJA (p = 0.01), readmissions following THA (p = 0.002), and surgical-related pain following TJA (p < 0.001). We did not find significant differences in the remaining parameters.

Conclusion

Outpatient procedures showed comparable and even better outcomes in total complications, complications stratified by type, readmissions, and reoperations at 30 and 90 days compared with inpatient TJA for selected patients.

Ambulatory total hip arthroplasty: Causes for failure to launch and associated risk factors

Aims

The volume of ambulatory total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures is increasing due to the emphasis on value-based care. The purpose of the study is to identify the causes for failed same-day discharge (SDD) and perioperative factors leading to failed SDD.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study followed pre-selected patients for SDD THA from 1 August 2018 to 31 December 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing unilateral THA with appropriate social support, age 18 to 75 years, and BMI < 37 kg/m². Patients with opioid dependence, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were collected from the electronic medical records. Possible risk factors for failed SDD were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

In all, 278 patients were identified with a mean age of 57.1 years (SD 8.1) and a mean BMI of 27.3 kg/m² (SD 4.5). A total of 96 patients failed SDD, with the most common reasons being failure to clear physical therapy (26%), dizziness (22%), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (11%). Risk factors associated with failed SDD included smokers (odds ratio (OR) 6.24; p = 0.009), a maximum postoperative pain score > 8 (OR 4.76; p = 0.004), and procedures starting after 11 am (OR 2.28; p = 0.015). A higher postoperative tolerable pain goal (numerical rating scale 4 to 10) was found to be associated with successful SDD (OR 2.7; p = 0.001). Age, BMI, surgical approach, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and anaesthesia type were not associated with failed SDD.

Conclusion

SDD is a safe and viable option for pre-selected patients interested in rapid recovery THA. The most common causes for failure to launch were failing to clear physical thereapy and patient symptomatology. Risk factors associated with failed SSD highlight the importance of preoperative counselling regarding smoking cessation and postoperative pain to set reasonable expectations. Future interventions should aim to improve patient postoperative mobilization, pain control, and decrease symptomatology.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):684–691.

Safety and efficacy of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of outpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) pathways compared to inpatient pathways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted to identify eligible studies. Studies comparing OJA with inpatient pathways-following hip and/or (partial) knee arthroplasty-were included. Included studies were assigned-based on OJA definition-to one of the following two groups: (1) outpatient surgery (OS); outpatient defined as discharge on the same day as surgery; and (2) semi-outpatient surgery (SOS); outpatient defined as discharge within 24 h after surgery with or without an overnight stay. Methodological quality was assessed. Outcomes included (serious) adverse events ((S)AEs), readmissions, successful same-day discharge rates, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and costs. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses by type of arthroplasty were performed when deemed appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies (OS = 26, SOS = 15) met the inclusion criteria. One RCT and 40 observational studies were included, with an overall risk-of-bias of moderate to high. Forty studies were included in the meta-analysis. Outpatients (both OS and SOS) were younger and had a lower BMI and ASA class compared to inpatients. Overall, no significant differences between outpatients and inpatients were found for overall complications and readmission rates, and improvement in PROMs. By type of arthroplasty, only THAs in OS pathways were associated with fewer AEs [OR = 0.55 (0.41-0.74)] compared to inpatient pathways. 92% of OS patients were discharged on the day of surgery. OJA resulted in an average cost reduction of $6.797,02.

CONCLUSION

OJA pathways are as safe and effective as inpatient pathways in selected populations, with a potential reduction of costs. Considerable risk of bias in the majority of studies emphasizes the need for further research.

Orthopaedic surgeons' perspective on the implementation of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty - Results of a nationwide survey

Background

Outpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) for the hip and knee is gaining popularity among orthopaedic surgeons worldwide. The purposes of this study were to (1) assess the proportion of Dutch orthopaedic surgeons who perform OJA; (2) identify surgeons' willingness to implement OJA in the future; (3) identify reasons and barriers to implement OJA; and (4) gather surgeon's perspective on the implementation of OJA.

Methods

A 20-item survey was developed and administered by email to orthopaedic surgeons who are a member of the Dutch Hip Society and Dutch Knee Society. Survey response rate was 40% (N = 123).

Results

Twenty-two respondents (18%) already implemented OJA, and 46% of respondents (who don't perform OJA) were interested to implement OJA in the future. Reasons to perform OJA included own positive experiences (82%), available evidence (77%) and patients' request (77%). Proponents' and opponents' view on safety and added value conflicted with each other. Other barriers included patient selection and organizational related (e.g., multidisciplinary support). Surgeons' view on evolution and relevance of OJA significantly differed by respondents who perform OJA versus respondents who don't perform OJA. Most respondents agreed with one another that the healthcare institution benefits most from OJA, and that optimization of the arthroplasty pathway could be reached through better patient education and -participation (e.g., eHealth, wearables).

Conclusion

One in five respondents currently implement OJA pathways, and about half of the remaining respondents are interested to implement OJA in the future. OJA-opponents aren't convinced of the value and safety of OJA, despite accumulating evidence supporting OJA. Future research should inform patient-selection and -acceptance and organizational implementation.

Same-day discharge arthroplasty has a higher overall complications rate than fast-track arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Published studies have reported many inconsistent results regarding the comparison of same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and inpatient TJA. More notably, many recent studies comparing same-day discharge TJA with fast-track TJA presented higher rates of complications for same-day discharge TJA, which raises concerns about the safety of same-day discharge TJA.

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases up to June 2020 for studies comparing mortality, readmission, and complications in same-day discharge and inpatient total hip or knee arthroplasty. Studies that used inpatient TJA as the control could be further divided into fast-track inpatient TJA (length of stay [LOS] ≤ 2 days) and traditional inpatient TJA (no restrictions on LOS). Relative risks were pooled to compare the outcomes of the same-day discharge group and the control group.

RESULTS

According to selection criteria and quality assessment, 14 studies including 222,766 cases were identified. There was no significant difference in the risk of mortality (RR = 1.42, CI [0.67, 3.01]) or readmission (RR = 0.93, CI [0.79, 1.10]) between same-day discharge TJA and inpatient TJA. Compared with fast-track TJA, the rate of overall complications in same-day discharge TJA was significantly higher (RR = 1.67, CI [1.45, 1.93]), while the rates of overall complications were similar between same-day discharge and traditional inpatient TJA (RR = 0.83, CI [0.67, 1.03]).

CONCLUSION

The overall safety of same-day discharge TJA is satisfactory; however, more complications were detected in same-day discharge TJA than that in fast-track TJA. Complications in same-day discharge TJA might be underestimated in some previous studies taking long-staying inpatient TJA as control. Being more cautious about complications is necessary in the care of same-day discharge TJA, and extensive prospective studies are needed to explore the optimized option that weighs both cost and complications.

Outpatient total hip arthroplasty does not increase complications and readmissions: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus about the safety of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to quantitatively evaluate and compare outpatient and inpatient THA studies in terms of complication and readmission rates.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed on 26 July 2019 on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and on the grey literature databases. The papers thus collected were used for a meta-analysis comparing outpatient and inpatient THA in terms of complication and readmission rates. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were defined according to Cochrane guidelines. The PRISMA guidelines were used to determine which papers to include in this study.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 2317 articles; of these, 8 articles were used for the meta-analysis. A total of 66,971 patients were included, of which 1428 were THA outpatients. The overall complication rate for outpatient THAs was 3.0%, while inpatient THAs had an overall complication rate of 4.7%. The readmission rate was 1.4% in outpatient THAs and 3.0% in inpatient THAs. Only 6 studies reported the number of deaths, which ranged from 0% to 0.01%. The included studies present a moderate risk of bias and, according to GRADE guidelines, the level of evidence for complications and readmissions is very low.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis documented that outpatient THA is a feasible approach since it does not increase complications or readmissions with respect to inpatient THA, but the available studies present a moderate risk of bias and the quality of evidence of these findings is very low. Future high-level studies are needed to confirm results and indications for outpatient THA.

Comparing complications of outpatient management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and Blount’s disease: A database study

BACKGROUND

Currents trends in pediatric orthopaedics has seen an increase in surgeries being successfully completed in an outpatient setting. Two recent examples include slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and Blount’s disease. Surgical indications are well-studied for each pathology, but to our knowledge, there is an absence in literature analyzing safety and efficacy of inpatient vs outpatient management of either condition. We believed there would be no increase in adverse outcomes associated with outpatient treatment of either conditions.

AIM

To investigate whether outpatient surgery for SCFE and Blount’s disease is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.

METHODS

The 2015-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Registries were used to compare patient characteristics, rates of complications, and readmissions between outpatient and inpatient surgery for SCFE and Blount’s disease.

RESULTS

Total 1788 SCFE database entries were included, 30% were performed in an outpatient setting. In situ pinning was used in 98.5% of outpatient surgeries and 87.8% of inpatient surgeries (P < 0.0001). Inpatients had a greater percent of total complications than outpatients 2.57% and 1.65% respectively. Regarding Blount’s disease, outpatient surgeries constituted 41.2% of the 189 procedures included in our study. The majority of inpatients were treated with a tibial osteotomy, while the majority of outpatients had a physeal arrest (P < 0.0001). Complications were encountered in 7.4% of patients, with superficial surgical site infections and wound dehiscence being the most common. 1.6% of patients had a readmission. No differences in complication and readmission risks were found between inpatients and outpatients.

CONCLUSION

The current trend is shifting towards earlier discharges and performing procedures in an outpatient setting. This can be safely performed for a large portion of children with SCFE and Blount’s disease without increasing the risk of complications or readmissions. Osteotomies are more commonly performed in an inpatient setting where monitoring is available.

Opioid-Prescribing Practices Between Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in an Outpatient Versus Inpatient Setting

ABSTRACT

Despite trends showing increases in the utilization of outpatient (OP) ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and decreases in the utilization of inpatient (IP) facilities for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), little is known about opioid prescribing for these procedures between each setting. This study evaluated differences in opioid prescribing and consumption between OP ASC and IP settings for elective TKA and THA surgeries over a 1-year period. Data collection also included pain and satisfaction of pain control postsurgery. In an OP ASC, analysis revealed a significant decrease in pills prescribed (p < .001, p < .001) and consumed (p < .001, p < .001) for TKA and THA, respectively. There was a significant decrease in the morphine equivalence units prescribed (p < .001, p < .001) and consumed (p < .001, p < .001) for TKA and THA, respectively. For TKA, pain was significantly lower (p = .018) and satisfaction of pain control was significantly higher (p = .007). For THA, pain (p = .374) and satisfaction of pain control (p = .173) were similar between the settings. Benefits of performing these surgeries in an OP ASC setting are patients having similar or lower levels of pain and having similar or higher satisfaction of pain control. Patients are also prescribed and consume less opioids. This has important implications for healthcare systems.

Recent Increases in Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Have Not Increased Early Complications

BACKGROUND

Outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in recent years. Recent regulatory changes may allow and incentivize outpatient THA in more patients; however, there are concerns regarding safety. The purpose of this study is to assess early complications in outpatient THA compared to longer hospitalization.

METHODS

We identified patients undergoing primary THA in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2015 and 2018. Patients were stratified by length of stay (LOS): 0 days (LOS 0), 1-2 days, and ≥3 days. Thirty-day rates of any complication, wound complications, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed. Multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 4813 (4%) patients underwent outpatient THA, 84,627 (64%) had LOS of 1-2 days, and 42,293 (32%) had LOS ≥3 days. LOS 0 patients were younger, had lower body mass index, and less medical comorbidities compared to those with postsurgical hospitalization. Any complication was experienced in 3.2% of the LOS 0 group, 5.3% of the LOS 1-2 group, and 15.6% for the LOS ≥3 group (P < .0001). Readmission rates were 1.6%, 2.6%, and 4.7% for the 3 groups, respectively (P < .0001). After controlling for confounding variables, patients with LOS 1-2 days had higher odds for any complication (odds ratio 1.56 [1.32-1.83) and readmission (odds ratio 1.41 [1.12-1.78]) compared to LOS 0 days. Patients with LOS ≥3 days had higher odds for complications compared to LOS 0 or 1-2 days.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient THA had lower odds for readmission or complications compared to LOS 1-2 days. Despite increased outpatient surgery, many patients had postsurgical hospitalization and, due to patient factors, this remains an integral patient of post-THA care.

Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review

Objective

Recent reports have shown that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA) may be a safe alternative to inpatient management in appropriately selected patients. The purpose was to review the literature reporting on outpatient SA.

Methods

A systematic review of publications on outpatient SA was performed. Included publications discussed patients who were discharged on the same calendar day or within 23 hours from surgery. Articles were categorized by discussions on complications, readmissions, and safety, patient selection, pain management strategies, cost effectiveness, and patient and surgeon satisfaction.

Results

Twenty-six articles were included. Patients undergoing outpatient SA were younger and with a lower BMI than those undergoing inpatient SA. Larger database studies reported more medical complications for patients undergoing inpatient compared to outpatient SA. Articles on pain management strategies discussed both single shot and continuous interscalene blocks with similar outcomes. Both patients and surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction following outpatient SA, and cost analysis studies demonstrated significant cost savings for outpatient SA.

Conclusion

In appropriately selected patients, outpatient SA can be a safe, cost-saving alternative to inpatient care and may lead to high satisfaction of both patients and physicians, though further studies are needed to clarify appropriate utilization of outpatient SA.

Patient Satisfaction is Equivalent for Inpatient and Outpatient Minimally-Invasive Adrenalectomy

INTRODUCTION

Same-day surgery in the carefully selected patient decreases costs, improves inpatient capacity, and decreases patient exposure to hospital-acquired conditions. Outpatient adrenalectomy has been shown to be safe and effective, but patients' perspectives have yet to be addressed. This study compares patient satisfaction following inpatient and outpatient adrenalectomy.

METHODS

An institutional database was queried for minimally-invasive adrenalectomies performed from 2017 to 2020. Patients were contacted up to two times to participate in a phone survey consisting of 25 questions modeled after the Outpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey (OAS CAHPS) assessing preparation for surgery, discharge experience, post-operative course, and overall satisfaction. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal Wallis, Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney, and Chi-square tests, as appropriate.

RESULTS

One hundred five adrenalectomy patients were identified, of which 98 were contacted and 58 responded (59%). Two surgeons contributed patients, with no difference in the percentage of patients in the outpatient group (51.7% versus 62.1%, P = 0.423). Outpatient adrenalectomy patients had slightly higher overall experience scores, but this difference was not statistically significant (9.12 ± 1.36 versus 8.93 ± 1.51, P = 0.367). Patients undergoing outpatient adrenalectomy were more likely to have their discharge plan discussed pre-operatively (94% versus 62%, P = 0.005), but no significant differences were noted between inpatient and outpatient groups regarding preparation for surgery, readiness for discharge, night of surgery experiences, or self-reported pain or complications (P > 0.05 for all). Significantly higher overall experience scores were reported by patients counseled about their discharge plan (9.27 versus 7.9, P = 0.036), felt prepared for recovery (9.39 versus 5.5, P < 0.001), received information about pain control (9.13 versus 7.00, P = 0.031), felt prepared at time of discharge (9.33 versus 5.80, P < 0.001), and received information about potential complications (9.29 versus 7.00, P = 0.001). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend towards outpatients being more likely to choose the same approach if they were to undergo surgery again (97% versus 84%, P = 0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction following adrenalectomy is significantly associated with patients' self-reported degree of preparation for surgery and discharge, with no significant difference in patient satisfaction between inpatient and outpatient groups. Patients undergoing outpatient adrenalectomy would be likely to choose the same approach compared to inpatients. Targeted pre-operative counseling can contribute to enhanced patient outcomes for all patients undergoing adrenalectomy.

The successful migration of total joint arthroplasty from the hospital inpatient to outpatient ASC setting

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to analyze the clinical results and complication rate of patients undergoing outpatient total joint arthroplasty by a single orthopedic group. All surgeries were performed in the practice-owned ambulatory surgery center (ASC).

METHODS

All patients indicated for outpatient total joint arthroplasty from 2016-2019 with complete pre and post-operative patient reported outcomes were enrolled in the study including hip, knee and partial knee replacements. Patient reported outcomes including HOOS, KOOS and VR-12 were collected at six months. Patient complication and satisfaction data was also collected.

RESULTS

There were 1007 patients enrolled in the study. At six months, THA HOOS and VR-12 scores improved to 82.2 and 54.5/45. TKA KOOS and VR-12 scores improved to an average of 74.3 and 54.0/43.6. At six months, UKA scores improved to an average of 73.6 and 55.1/41.2. All HOOS, KOOS and VR-12 PCS scores improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.001) and met MCID thresholds. A separate cohort of 1898 regionally tracked cases with comprehensive global complication data exhibited 111 complications (unplanned post-operative events generating a medical expense) including manipulation 13 (0.68%), DVT/PE 4 (0.2%), medical 45 (2.4%), wound 8 (0.4%), infection 8 (0.4%). Sixty-six outpatient cases (3.5%) experienced clinical complications requiring some form of additional treatment.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient joint arthroplasty performed in the ASC is safe and effective in appropriately selected patients with complication rates that compares favorably to inpatient procedures.