Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Significantly Greater Improvement in Function than Total Knee Arthroplasty Despite Equivalent Satisfaction for Isolated Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis

Health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While previous research has demonstrated potential advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly in terms of clinical outcomes such as function and pain relief, the specific impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to address this gap by comparing HRQOL outcomes between UKA and TKA, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases up to July 15, 2023. Eligible studies assessed HRQOL using EQ-5D, SF-36, or SF-12 and were assessed for methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Seven eligible studies were included, comprising a total of 64,585 patients with 35,809 undergoing TKA and 28,776 undergoing UKA. Patient age ranged from 52.0 to 67.7 years with an average BMI ranging from 27.2 to 31.0 kg/m2. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 10 years. Five studies (63,829 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using EQ-5D showed significantly better outcomes for UKA compared to TKA (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.02). Two studies (756 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using SF-36 showed no significant difference between TKA and UKA. Five studies (63,286 patients) that evaluated functional outcomes using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) showed significantly better functional scores for UKA compared to TKA (MD -1.29, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.72). Four studies (24,570 patients) that reported patient satisfaction showed no statistically significant difference between TKA and UKA (MD 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05). Further subgroup analysis did not affect the conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that UKA is associated with better HRQOL and knee function, as well as similar patient satisfaction, compared to TKA for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis.

Analysis of the causes of primary revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A case series

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has great advantages in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis, but its revision rate is higher than that of total knee arthroplasty.

AIM

To summarize and analyse the causes of revision after UKA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series study in which the reasons for the first revision after UKA are summarized. We analysed the clinical symptoms, medical histories, laboratory test results, imaging examination results and treatment processes of the patients who underwent revision and summarized the reasons for primary revision after UKA.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients, including 3 males and 10 females, underwent revision surgery after UKA. The average age of the included patients was 67.62 years. The prosthesis was used for 3 d to 72 months. The main reasons for revision after UKA were improper suturing of the surgical opening (1 patient), osteophytes (2 patients), intra-articular loose bodies (2 patients), tibial prosthesis loosening (2 patients), rheumatoid arthritis (1 patient), gasket dislocation (3 patients), anterior cruciate ligament injury (1 patient), and medial collateral ligament injury with residual bone cement (1 patient).

CONCLUSION

The causes of primary revision after UKA were gasket dislocation, osteophytes, intra-articular loose bodies and tibial prosthesis loosening. Avoidance of these factors may greatly reduce the rate of revision after UKA, improve patient satisfaction and reduce medical burden.

Return to Sport After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Patello-Femoral Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Data on sports/physical activity participation following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patello-femoral arthroplasty (PFA) is variable and limited. The purpose of this study was to assess participations, outcomes, and limitations in sports following UKA and PFA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent UKA and PFA at a single institution from 2015 to 2020 were surveyed on sports participation before and after surgery. Data was correlated with perioperative patient characteristics and outcome scores. Among 776 patients surveyed, 356 (50%) patients responded. Of respondents, 296 (83.1%) underwent UKA, 44 (12.6%) underwent PFA, and 16 (4.5%) underwent both UKA/PFA.

RESULTS

Activity participation rates were 86.5, 77.3, and 87.5% five years prior, and 70.9, 61.4, and 75% at one year prior to UKA, PFA, and UKA/PFA, respectively. Return to sports rates were 81.6, 64.7, and 62.3% at mean 4.6 years postoperatively, respectively. The most common activities were recreational walking, swimming, cycling, and golf. Patients returned to a similar participation level for low-impact activities, whereas participation decreased for intermediate- and high-impact activities. Patients participating in activities had higher postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (P < .001), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (P = .045) and Mental Component Score (P = .012). Activity restrictions were reported among 25, 36.4, and 25% of UKA, PFA, and UKA/PFA patients, respectively, and were more commonly self-imposed than surgeon-directed.

CONCLUSIONS

Though UKA patients' postoperative sports participation may improve compared to one year preoperatively, participation for patients surgically treated for isolated osteoarthritis is decreased compared to 5 years preoperatively and varies among patient subsets.

C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates after Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty-Less Implant Equals Quicker Normalization

Postoperative follow up after total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) includes C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to scan for and possibly diagnose a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study was to describe the postoperative changes in CRP and ESR values after UKA and compare them with values obtained after TKA. Patients operated on between 2020 and 2022 were eligible for this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were patients with at least 4 postoperative visits associated with blood test screening for PJI, aged > 45, with uneventful follow-up for the first 90 days. Exclusion criteria were a history of chronic inflammatory disease, revision for any reason, and readmission for any reason. Blood samples were collected on the 3rd, 15th, and 30th postoperative days and once between the 45th and the 90th day. The mean and peak values were compared between the two groups. The study included 277 patients (243 TKAs and 34 UKAs). Mean age was significantly lower in the UKA group (67.2 ± 7.5 vs. 60.0 ± 5.9). On the 3rd and the 15th postoperative day, the UKA patients had significantly lower ESR and CRP levels. The levels normalized after the first month. While the TKA patients showed higher values, the trend normalized after the 30th day. CRP and ESR values rose significantly after TKA and persisted up to the 15th day postoperatively. CRP and ESR values normalized faster in patients undergoing UKA. Patients > 65 had higher CRP and ESR values during their routine follow-ups.

Computed tomography-based patient-specific cutting guides used for positioning of the femoral component of implants during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) improves the femoral component positioning of implants during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using cadaver bone models.

METHODS

Fifty adult cadaveric femoral bone specimens collected from February 2016-2018, were randomized to receive medial UKA with a PSI guide (n = 25) or conventional instrumentation (CI) (n = 25). Standard anteroposterior and lateral view radiographs were obtained postoperatively to assess the coronal and sagittal positioning of the femoral prostheses, respectively. The osteotomy time was recorded to assess the convenience of PSI in guiding osteotomy.

RESULTS

Osteotomy time significantly shortened in the PSI group (3.12 ± 0.65 versus 4.33 ± 0.73 min, p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the postoperative coronal alignment of the femoral component between the PSI and CI groups (varus/valgus angle: 1.43 ± 0.93° vs. 2.65 ± 1.50°, p = 0.001). The prevalence of outliers in coronal alignment was lower in the PSI than the CI group (2/25, 8% vs. 9/25, 36%). Sagittal posterior slope angle of the femoral component was significantly different between the two groups (8.80 ± 0.65° and 6.29 ± 1.88° in the CI and PSI groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The malalignment rate of the femoral component in the sagittal plane was 60% in the CI group, whereas no positioning deviation was observed in the PSI group.

CONCLUSION

This study used a cadaver model to support the fact that CT-based PSI shows an advantage over CI in optimizing implant positioning for UKAs.

Minimally invasive small incision surgical technique for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

It is always a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons to minimise surgical incisions while ensuring excellent surgical results. We propose the minimally invasive small incision (MISI) technique and an extramedullary positioning technique in the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) surgery. This study aimed to clarify the early postoperative clinical outcomes and component alignment between MISI and conventional minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 60 patients who underwent MISI-UKA and 60 patients who underwent MIS-UKA as controls. Clinical parameters include the time of straight leg raising, postoperative walking time with walker assistance, hospital stay, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score and Knee Society Score (KSS). The postoperative components and lower extremity alignment were compared between the two groups with radiographic image measurement.

RESULTS

The MISI group obtained a smaller incision during knee extension (P < 0.001) but a longer tourniquet usage time than the MIS group. The MISI group lost less blood (P < 0.001). The MISI group achieved straight leg raising and walking with aid earlier after surgery, with a shorter hospital stay than the MIS group (P < 0.001). Range of motion (ROM), NRS and KSS scores revealed no significant difference between the two groups in six months postoperative follow-up (P > 0.05). Radiographic measurement results between the two groups revealed no statistical difference (P > 0.05) CONCLUSION: The MISI-UKA could achieve faster earlier recovery after surgery and shorter hospital stays without compromising the principles of proper prosthesis position and limb alignment compared with the conventional MIS-UKA.

Combination of a High Residual Varus and Joint-Line Lowering Strongly Increases the Risk of Early Implant Failure in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Outliers in implant positioning, malalignment, and joint line height change are risk factors for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) failure. However, their relationships and patterns in large datasets remain unexplored. This study assessed medial UKA survival in a large cohort and explored associated risk factors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study on medial UKA patients (2011 to 2019). Radiological outcomes included tibial implant positioning in the coronal plane, posterior tibial slope, residual knee deformity, and joint line restitution. Survival rate at last follow-up was recorded. Multinomial logistic regression analyzed risk factors, incorporating demographic and univariate analysis data.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-six knees met inclusion criteria, with 10 lost to follow-up (2.7%). Mean follow-up was 61.3 months [24.1 to 135.1]. 5- and 10-year implant survival rates were 92% ± 1.6 and 88.4% ± 3.8, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified post-operative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) ≤ 175° (OR = 5.30 [1.64 to 17.13], P = .005) and joint line lowering ≥2 mm (OR = 8.86 [2.06 to 38.06]) as significant risk factors for tibial implant failure. Their combination carried a significantly high risk of failure (OR = 10.3 [3.1 to 34.3]). Post-operative HKA < 175° was common in knees with pre-operative HKA < 172°.

CONCLUSION

This study reports encouraging 5- and 10-year survival outcomes for medial UKA. Tibial loosening was the main reason for revision. Patients with joint line lowering ≥ 2 mm and post-operative HKA ≤ 175° were at high risk of tibial implant failure. Surgeons should carefully restore the joint line in cases of pre-operative HKA < 172°.

Impact of lateral meniscus injury detected by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on midterm results after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The significance of lateral meniscus injury and its impact on success rates with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is still debated among scholars. This study aims to investigate whether preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of lateral meniscus injury influence midterm outcomes following UKA.

METHODS

This study recruited 104 patients who underwent medial mobile-bearing UKA. Based on the extent of lateral meniscus injury indicated by the preoperative MRI and Stoller's classification system, patients were divided into two groups: the normal group (grade 0), and the lateral meniscus injury group (grade 3). Further, preoperative demographic and clinical outcome data (Hospital for Special Surgery score, lateral knee pain, squatting, and knee extension ability) were compared at least 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in knee function or clinical outcome was found between the normal group (n = 59) and the lateral meniscus injury group (n = 45). During the 39.2 months (range: 24-64 months), no patient required any reoperation or revision procedures.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the presence of lateral meniscus injury as determined by preoperative MRI does not affect the midterm results after UKA. Without additional treatment for lateral meniscus injury, UKA can yield desired outcomes regardless of the presence of lateral meniscus injury on preoperative MRI.

Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees

PURPOSE

Implant malpositioning, joint line (JL) lowering, and malalignment have been identified as risk factors for implant failure in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aims of this study were to compare the accuracy of implant positioning in robotic-assisted UKA versus conventional UKA in a large cohort and examine the correlation with implant survival at mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 356 medial UKAs from 2011 to 2019. The radiological measurements performed were coronal positioning of tibial implant according to Cartier angle (Δ Cartier), posterior tibial slope (PTS), residual hip-knee-ankle (HKA), and JL restoration. Outliers were defined as follows: post-operative HKA < 175° or > 180°, Δ Cartier > 3° or <  - 3°, JL change ≥ 2 mm, and PTS < 2° or > 8°. The survival probability was reported at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

Out of the 356 knees included, 159 underwent conventional UKA (44.5%) and 197 (55.5%) robotic-assisted UKA. The mean follow-up was 61.3 months ± 24.0. Robotic UKA was associated with better accuracy compared to conventional UKA in relation to HKA (67% vs 56%, p = 0.023), JL restoration (70% vs 44%, p < 0.0001), PTS (83% vs 55%, p < 0.0001), and tibial varus restoration (65% vs 55%, p = 0.049). Implant survival in the robotic group was found to be superior at the last follow-up (96.4% versus 87.3% at 9 years, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Robotic assistance in patients undergoing medial UKA was associated with better accuracy compared to conventional UKA with respect to tibial implant positioning, post-operative limb alignment, and JL restoration. This was translated in improved survival at mid-term follow-up favouring the robotic group.

Periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: treatment options and outcomes. What is the current evidence in literature?

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) following unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) will increase. The aim of this review is to evaluate current evidence regarding treatment options, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of PJI management in UKAs.

METHODS

A systematic review of English literature was performed. Retrospective and prospective studies providing treatment options, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of PJI following UKAs were included. PJI type, treatment, survival rate with no reoperation for infection and survival rate with no reoperation for any cause were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included. Three studies focusing on PJI following UKA (45 cases) report a survival rate with no reoperation for infection of 68.9% and a survival rate with no reoperation for any cause of 48.9%. Eight articles concerning UKA failure modes (28 cases) overestimate survival rate with no reoperation for infection (88.9%) and survival rate with no reoperation for any cause (88.9%) (p < 0.05). DAIR reports a rate of infection eradication failure ranging from 43.8 to 100%. 1SE allows for a survival rate with no reoperation for infection of 100%. 2SE reports a rate of infection eradication failure ranging from 0 to 12.5%. A high rate of early aseptic reoperation is reported, despite infection eradication (20% in DAIR; 28.5% in 2SE).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment strategy is determined by symptom timing, PJI type (acute vs chronic), causative organism, patient's comorbidities. A longer duration of PJI or severe host and extremity status seems to require 2SE or 1SE. Patients who have a shorter duration of PJI could receive DAIR.

Pre-operative predictive factors of residual varus on the mechanical axis after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Background

Residual varus after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) happens frequently. This study aims to evaluate the pre-operative contributing factors of residual varus.

Methods

A total of 1,002 knees (880 patients, 201 patients were male, and 679 were female) underwent Oxford UKA in the Orthopedic Surgery Department of the Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from March 2018 to April 2021. The mean age of the patient was 64.7 ± 7.7 years. To assess residual varus, the full-length lower extremity is placed upright for EOS imaging, with the knee fully extended. The angle of post-operative residual varus was measured as described by Noyes et al. Of the knees studied, they were either categorized into an under-corrected group (post-operative Noyes angle >5°) or a corrected group (post-operative Noyes angle ≤5°). Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), range of motion (ROM), Clinical American Knee Society Score (Clinical AKSS), and Function American Knee Society Score (Function AKSS) were compared. The following additional parameters were measured: pre-operative Noyes angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), the posterior slope of the proximal tibia angle (PPTA), joint line converge angle (JLCA), and fixed flexion deformity (FFD).

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in regards to gender (p = 0.428), surgical leg (p = 0.937), age (p = 0.851), BMI (p = 0.064), pre-operative Clinical AKSS (p = 0.206) and Function AKSS (p = 0.100). However, pre-operative ROM statistically differed between the two groups (p < 0.001). The contributing factors of post-operative residual varus were determined to be the following parameters: pre-operative MPTA (p < 0.001, OR = 4.522, 95% CI: 2.927-6.984), pre-operative Noyes (p < 0.001, OR = 3.262, 95% CI: 1.802-5.907) and pre-operative FFD (p = 0.007, OR = 1.862, 95% CI: 1.182-2.934). The effects of pre-operative LDFA (p = 0.146), JLCA (p = 0.942), and pre-operative PPTA (p = 0.899) on the post-operative mechanical axis did not show statistical significance.

Conclusions

Patients with severe pre-operative varus, particularly varus deformity mainly from the tibial side or pre-operative FFD, are more prone to get extremity mechanical axis residual varus after UKA with Oxford.

Partial versus total knee arthroplasty for isolated antero-medial osteoarthritis - An analysis of PROMs and satisfaction

AIM

This study aimed to compare the patient-reported functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) versus Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), performed for anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) of the knee in patients from an Indian population, at a minimum 3-year follow-up.

METHODS

This is a prospective matched cohort study (1:2 ratio). One hundred and one UKA cases were matched to 206 TKA cases by propensity score matching for age, body mass index (BMI), gender distribution, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The primary outcome (Oxford knee score, OKS) was assessed at a 3-year follow-up, along with secondary outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] Score, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Anterior Knee Pain (Kujala) score, patient satisfaction, and revision rate at the final follow-up).

RESULTS

The UKA group was superior to the TKA group in patient-reported functional outcomes based on the OKS (p = 0.004). Using the FJS score, UKA was more likely to be a forgotten joint compared to TKA (p < 0.001). However, differences in the OKS and FJS did not meet the reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. Quality of life (EuroQol-5D VAS scale) was found to be significantly higher in the UKA group (p < 0.001). Patients in the UKA group were more likely to be very satisfied (75.2%) versus the TKA group (62.1%, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

For AMOA, UKA was associated with improved patient satisfaction compared to TKA. Although patient-reported outcome measures were statistically in favour of UKA over TKA, the differences were not clinically significant. Multicenter and randomized studies comparing the two procedures are warranted.

EVIDENCE

Level-II Therapeutic.

All-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with increased risks of poorer knee society knee score and lower satisfaction in obese patients

BACKGROUND

Although metal-backed tibial component (MB) is biomechanically superior to all-polyethylene (AP) implants in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), recent studies have shown comparable functional outcomes between the two. However, no study has examined this comparison in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²). We investigated whether functional outcomes between the two implants differ among obese patients, and whether the extent of obesity influences these outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred twenty-two UKA implants from 347 obese patients were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were assessed using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Function Score (KSFS), the original Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment was recorded. Patients' fulfillment of expectations and satisfaction with the surgery outcome was also graded. Patients were further divided into lower obesity (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m²) and higher obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) to examine effect modification.

RESULTS

There were no differences in functional outcomes and quality-of-life scores, MCID attainment of functional scores, as well as satisfaction and expectation fulfillment between AP and MB. Among higher obesity patients, AP was associated with a poorer KSKS (p = 0.031) and lower proportion of satisfaction fulfillment (p = 0.041) 2 years postoperatively compared to MB.

CONCLUSION

We found no differences in functional and quality-of-life outcomes between fixed-bearing AP and MB tibial components among obese patients who underwent UKA. However, among higher obesity patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²), patients with AP tibial component were associated with lower KSKS score and a lower proportion of attaining satisfaction fulfillment 2 years postoperatively.

Reliability and Validity of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was developed to document outcomes from knee injury, including the impact of osteoarthritis on knee function. The purpose of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of the KOOS subscales for evaluating outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

KOOS Pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Sport, Symptoms, and Quality of Life (QoL) scores collected from 172 patients who underwent UKA were used in the analysis. KOOS subscales were tested for reliability and validity of scores through a Rasch model analysis.

RESULTS

KOOS Sport, KOOS ADL, and KOOS QoL had good evidence of reliability with acceptable person reliability, person separation, and item reliability. For overall scale functioning, KOOS Pain, Symptoms, and ADL all had 1 question that did not have an acceptable value for infit or outfit mean square value. Questions in KOOS Sport and QoL all had acceptable values. There was a positive, linear relationship between the Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary and the KOOS subscales which indicated good evidence of convergent validity. These associations were also seen when the cohort was separated in medial and lateral UKA.

CONCLUSION

Two of the 5 KOOS subscales (KOOS Sport and KOOS QoL) were considered adequate in measuring outcomes, as well as reliability. The KOOS ADL had borderline values; however, it had adequate infit and outfit values. The KOOS Pain and Symptom score performed poorly in this analysis. For documenting outcomes following UKA, this study supports the use of KOOS ADL, Sport, and QoL.

Improved accuracy and reproducibility of a novel CT-free robotic surgical assistant for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

Alignment errors in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) predispose to premature implant loosening and polyethylene wear. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a novel CT-free robotic surgical assistant improves the accuracy and reproducibility of bone resections in UKA compared to conventional manual instrumentation.

METHODS

Sixty matched cadaveric limbs received medial UKA with either the ROSA^® Partial Knee System or conventional instrumentation. Fifteen board-certified orthopaedic surgeons with no prior experience with this robotic application performed the procedures with the same implant system. Bone resection angles in the coronal, sagittal and transverse planes were determined using optical navigation while resection depth was obtained using calliper measurements. Group comparison was performed using Student's t test (mean absolute error), F test (variance) and Fisher's exact test (% within a value), with significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Compared to conventional instrumentation, the accuracy of bone resections with CT-free robotic assistance was significantly improved for all bone resection parameters (p < 0.05), other than distal femoral resection depth, which did not differ significantly. Moreover, the variance was significantly lower (i.e. fewer chances of outliers) for five of seven parameters in the robotic group (p < 0.05). All values in the robotic group had a higher percentage of cases within 2° and 3° of the intraoperative plan. No re-cuts of the proximal tibia were required in the robotic group compared with 40% of cases in the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

The ROSA^® Partial Knee System was significantly more accurate, with fewer outliers, compared to conventional instrumentation. The data reported in our current study are comparable to other semiautonomous robotic devices and support the use of this robotic technology for medial UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cadaveric study, Level V.

A Comparative Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty and Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 patients admitted to the Department of Orthopaedics of Yijishan Hospital from 2020 to 2021. The patients were divided into UKA group (n = 15) and TKA group (control, n = 15). The intraoperative situation and postoperative clinical indicators of patients in the two groups were collected and compared, such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and postoperative functional recovery. Postoperative functional recovery was investigated by the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), knee score scale (HSS), and knee range of motion (ROM) scores 5 days after surgery.

Results

Perioperative indexes in the UKA group were significantly lower than those in the TKA group, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first time going to the ground, and length of hospital stay. VAS, HSS, and ROM scores in the two groups were significantly improved after surgery compared with those before surgery. However, ROM scores in the UKA group were significantly better than in the TKA group. In terms of early postoperative complications, there was one case of venous thrombosis of lower limbs in the UKA group, while in the TKA group there was one case of delayed wound healing due to diabetes, and one case of deep infection.

Conclusion

Both UKA and TKA are very successful options for the treatment of KOA, but the use of UKA can promote the recovery of postoperative knee function, reduce postoperative complications, and achieve more satisfactory than expected results.

Medial/central PF arthritis and functionally stable ACL deficiency do not compromise outcomes of fixed-bearing medial UKA

BACKGROUND

There is limited published data assessing functional scores and patient satisfaction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with patellofemoral (PF) arthritis or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. The purpose of this study was to determine whether medial/central PF arthritis or functionally stable ACL deficiency compromise outcomes of fixed-bearing medial UKA at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The hypothesis was that equivalent outcomes can be achieved in patients with substantial medial/central PF arthritis or with functionally stable ACL deficiency.

METHODS

The authors studied a consecutive series of 229 patients (240 knees) at 36.9 ± 6.3 months after receiving fixed-bearing medial UKA. Patients completed pre- and post-operative (2 years) clinical outcome questionnaires for Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EQ-5D, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations between clinical scores, patient demographics, PF arthritis and functionally stable ACL deficiency.

RESULTS

Of the 240 knees, 125 (54%) had substantial medial/central PF arthritis and 21 (9%) functionally stable ACL deficiency. Multivariable analyses revealed no association between outcomes and medial/central PF arthritis, but knees with functionally stable ACL deficiency were associated with better KOOS-PS (β = 8.99, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Fixed-bearing medial UKA grants satisfactory outcomes at 2 years even in knees with substantial medial/central PF arthritis or functionally stable ACL deficiency. Longer-term prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these promising findings regarding outcomes in patients traditionally contraindicated for medial UKA.

Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Compromise the Functional Outcomes of Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Although Revision for Progressive Arthritis May Occur Earlier

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency is commonly considered a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of UKA after prior ACL reconstruction (rACL cohort) to UKA with an intact native ACL (nACL cohort).

METHODS

Forty-five patients from 3 institutions who underwent medial UKA after prior rACL were matched by age, gender, preoperative function scores, and body mass index to 90 patients who underwent UKA with an intact nACL. Primary outcomes were Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Oxford Knee Scores, Knee Society Functional Scores, and Kellgren-Lawrence scores in the unresurfaced, lateral tibiofemoral compartment. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and the need for revision to TKA.

RESULTS

At a mean of 3.6 years, all PROMs improved significantly with no differences identified between groups. The incidence of revision TKA was similar between cohorts (P = 1.00); however, the mean time to revision for progressive osteoarthritis was 4.0 years in the nACL group and 2.2 years in the rACL group. Twenty percent of rACL patients had a postoperative complication compared to 8% in the nACL group. Despite presenting with a similar degree of lateral arthritis, a greater percentage of patients developed Kellgren-Lawrence scores of ≥3 in the rACL cohort (9%) than in the nACL cohort (0%).

CONCLUSION

A previously reconstructed ACL does not appear to compromise the short-term functional outcomes of UKA; however, there is a higher rate of minor complications and progression of lateral compartment arthritis, which should be considered with patients in the shared decision process.

Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results

INTRODUCTION

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has an infection rate of 0.1-0.8%. Despite the wide amount of literature about septic total knee arthroplasty management, few data are available for UKA infection treatment. The aim is to present the clinical and radiological outcomes along with complication rates of a series of septic UKA treated with two-stage exchange.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 16 patient treated with staged UKA revision for infection between June 2015 and September 2019 in a single bone infection unit. The main demographic and surgical data were recorded. Clinical scores (VAS, KSS, OKS, postoperative ROM), radiological parameters (osseointegration, loosening and radiolucencies) and complications were reported. The mean follow-up was 33.5 ± 6.9 months.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 68.5 ± 9.1. All but two were medial UKA. The mean number of previous surgeries was 2.9 ± 1.9. The mean ROM, VAS, KSS and OKS of the entire population improved significantly (p < 0.01). Radiological analysis did not show any migration or implant loosening. Ten constrained condylar and six posterior stabilized prosthesis were finally implanted. One intraoperative pathogen isolation was recorded and managed with suppressive therapy and good final outcome. The implant survivorship free from infection was 100% at the final follow-up. The overall survival rate for any reason of revision was 100% CONCLUSION: According to our results, staged revision represents a reliable ad effective option in delayed and late UKA infections. This technique provides optimal clinical and radiological results with acceptable complication rates. To the best of our knowledge, this represent the widest case series on infected UKA managed with two-stage exchange.

An up to date on clinical prospects and management of osteoarthritis

The rising prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) in the general population has necessitated the development of novel treatment options. It is critical to recognize the joint as a separate entity participating in degenerative processes, as well as the multifaceted nature of OA. OA is incurable because there is currently no medication that can stop or reverse cartilage or bone loss. As this point of view has attracted attention, more research is being directed toward determining how the various joint components are impacted and how they contribute to OA pathogenesis. Over the next few years, several prospective therapies focusing on inflammation, cartilage metabolism, subchondral bone remodelling, cellular senescence, and the peripheral nociceptive pathway are predicted to transform the OA therapy landscape. Stem cell therapies and the use of various biomaterials to target articular cartilage (AC) and osteochondral tissues are now being investigated in considerable detail. Currently, laboratory-made cartilage tissues are on the verge of being used in clinical settings. This review focuses on the update of clinical prospects and management of osteoarthritis, as well as future possibilities for the treatment of OA.

•

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a general term that incorporates several different joint diseases.

•

The exact pathophysiology of OA remains unclear.

•

OA is incurable because there is currently no medication that can stop or reverse cartilage or bone loss.

•

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most frequently prescribed medications to alleviate arthritic discomfort.

•

Stem cell therapies to target articular cartilage and osteochondral tissues are now under investigation.

Knee Scores of Patients with Non-Lateral Compartmental Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Mobile, Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

To evaluate knee scores and clinical efficacies of patients with non‐lateral unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) who randomly underwent mobile‐bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), fixed‐bearing (FB) UKA, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

From September 2015 to February 2017, a prospective, randomized, parallel, single‐center trial of 180 patients (78 males and 102 females; 63.3 ± 6.9 years) with non‐lateral compartmental knee OA was performed in the first author‐affiliated hospital. The patients were randomly divided into three groups (each group included 60 patients) and received medial cemented Oxford phase 3 MB UKA, medial cemented Link FB UKA, or cemented DePuy Sigma PFC TKA, respectively. A similar perioperative management and fast‐track surgery program was carried out for all patients. The knee scores at 3‐year follow‐up after operation and clinical efficacies of these three groups of patients were recorded, investigated, and compared.

Results

Primarily, compared to the TKA group, the UKA groups (MB UKA and FB UKA) had shorter operative time (median 63.2 < 67.1 min), less bleeding (8.6 < 30.0 mL), earlier resumption of walking without crutches (3.0 < 8.0 days) and walking up and down the stairs (5.0 < 10.0 days) (P < 0.001), higher FJS scores (78.0 > 74.5) (P = 0.007), better results in all knee scores (except VAS and KSS function scores) (P < 0.05), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee at the 3‐year follow‐up (123.0° > 96.0°) (P = 0.001). Secondarily, compared to the TKA group, the MB UKA group showed better results in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index (WOMAC) stiffness (83.6 > 79.6), WOMAC total (86.3 > 83.2), Oxford knee score (OKS) (20.0 < 23.0), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (78.5 > 74.5), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee (123.0 > 96.0) (P < 0.05). Moreover, the FB UKA group showed higher Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) (91.0 > 88.5), WOMAC stiffness (84.3 > 79.6), WOMAC function (85.2 > 81.7), WOMAC total scores (87.6 > 83.2), and a larger maximum flexion angle of the knee (119.0° > 96.0°) than the TKA group (P < 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in all knee scores and maximum flexion angles of the knee for the MB UKA and FB UKA groups (P > 0.05). There was one case with original bearing dislocation in MB UKA group. One patient with displacement of the femoral component caused by a fall injury, and another patient, who lost his life in a car accident, were involved in the FB UKA group. There was an infection case and an intermuscular vein thrombosis case in TKA group.

Conclusion

UKA showed more advantages than TKA; however, there was no significant difference between the MB UKA and FB UKA groups for treatment of non‐lateral compartmental knee OA.

Fewer Adverse Events Following Outpatient Compared with Inpatient Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a common procedure for unicompartmental knee arthritis, often resulting in pain relief and improved function. The demand for total knee arthroplasty in the U.S. is projected to grow 85% between 2014 and 2030, and the volume of UKA procedures is growing 3 to 6 times faster than that of total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to examine the safety of outpatient and inpatient UKA and to investigate changes over time as outpatient procedures were performed more frequently.

METHODS

Patients who underwent UKA from 2005 to 2018 as part of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified. Patients were divided into an early cohort (5,555 patients from 2005 to 2015) and late cohort (5,627 patients from 2016 to 2018). Outpatient status was defined as discharge on the day of surgery. Adverse events within 30 days postoperatively were compared, with adjustment for baseline characteristics with use of standard multivariate regression and propensity-score-matching techniques.

RESULTS

Among the 5,555 cases in the early cohort, the rate of surgical-site infection was lower for inpatient (0.84%) compared with outpatient UKA (1.69%; adjusted relative risk [RR] for inpatient, 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 1.0; p = 0.045); no other significant differences were identified. Among the 5,627 cases in the late cohort, inpatient UKA had higher rates of any complication (2.53% compared with 0.95% for outpatient UKA; adjusted RR for inpatient, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.3; p = 0.001) and readmission (1.81% compared with 0.88% for outpatient UKA; adjusted RR for inpatient, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.5; p = 0.023). In the propensity-score-matched comparison for the late cohort, inpatient UKA had a higher rate of any complication (RR for inpatient, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.0; p = 0.049) and return to the operating room (RR for inpatient, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 12.6; p = 0.009). Although the rate of readmission was almost twice as high among inpatients (1.67% compared with 0.84% for outpatients; RR for inpatient, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.1; p = 0.059), this difference did not reach significance with the sample size studied. There was a significant reduction in the overall rate of complications over time (3.44% in the early cohort compared with 2.11% in the late cohort; adjusted RR for late cohort, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.8; p = 0.001), with a more than fourfold reduction among outpatients (3.95% in the early cohort compared with 0.95% in the late cohort; adjusted RR for late cohort, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.5; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient UKA was associated with a lower risk of complications compared with inpatient UKA when contemporary data are examined. We identified a dramatic reduction in complications across the early and late cohorts, suggesting an improvement in quality over time, with the largest improvements seen among outpatients. This shift may represent changes in patient selection or improvements in perioperative protocols.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Joint awareness after unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: Which feels more natural?

Background/Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the joint awareness and knee function after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the management of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis.

Methods

Patients who underwent UKA or TKA at our institution for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis from 2015 to 2020 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were screened. 116 eligible patients were invited and 94 volunteer patients participated. All patients were evaluated with The Forgotten Joint Score-12 and Lysholm Knee Scale.

Results

Average follow-up period was 29.13±15.48 months for UKA and 31.66±2.91 months for TKA groups ( p=0.292). FJS-12 of the UKA group was significantly higher than that of the TKA group (79.74±15.06 and 63.25±19.86, respectively; p=0.024). The Lysholm Knee Scale score was also significantly higher in the UKA group compared with the TKA group (92.94±8.74 and 78.34±14.99, respectively; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that patients who underwent UKA were less aware of their artificial joints and had better knee function compared to patients who underwent TKA for medial osteoarthritis of the knee.

Joint awareness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the joint awareness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that patients with UKA could better forget about their artificial joint in comparison to TKA.

METHODS

A search of major literature databases and bibliographic details revealed 105 studies evaluating forgotten joint score in UKA and TKA. Seven studies found eligible for this review were assessed for risk of bias and quality of evidence using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The forgotten joint score (FJS-12) was assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean FJS-12 at 2 years was 82.35 in the UKA group and 74.05 in the TKA group. Forest plot analysis of five studies (n = 930 patients) revealed a mean difference of 7.65 (95% CI: 3.72, 11.57, p = 0.0001; I² = 89% with p < 0.0001) in FJS-12 at 2 years. Further sensitivity analysis lowered I² heterogeneity to 31% after exclusion of the study by Blevin et al. (MD 5.88, 95%CI: 3.10, 8.66, p < 0.0001). A similar trend of differences in FJS-12 between the groups was observed at 6 months (MD 32.49, 95% CI: 17.55, 47.43, p < 0.0001) and at 1 year (MD 25.62, 95% CI: 4.26, 46.98, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

UKA patients can better forget about their artificial joint compared to TKA patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Preoperative Flexion Contracture Does Not Compromise the Outcomes and Survivorship of Medial Fixed Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Despite the expanding indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the classic indication that limits flexion contracture to <5° in fixed bearing UKA excludes most patients with arthritic knees and has not been challenged in modern literature. This study compared the clinical outcomes between patients with severe flexion contracture and controls undergoing UKA.

METHODS

Eighty seven medial fixed bearing UKAs performed in patients with severe (≥15°) flexion contracture were matched 1:1 with 87 controls without flexion or recurvatum deformity (-5°<extension<5°) using propensity scores to control for age, sex, BMI, Charlson comorbidity index, ASA class, and baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Perioperative outcomes were recorded. Range of motion, Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, SF-36, and patient satisfaction were assessed at 6 months and 2 years. Survivorship was recorded at mean 11.5 ± 3.2 years.

RESULTS

Preoperative knee extension in the control and contracture groups was 0.9° ± 1.9° and 18.0° ± 3.5° (P < .001), respectively, whereas flexion was 122.8° ± 27.9° and 120.6° ± 13.6° (P = .502). The contracture group had poorer Knee Society functional (P = .023) and SF-36 physical score (P = .010) at 6 months. However, there was no difference in PROMs at 2 years. A similar proportion achieved the minimal clinically important difference for each PROM and was satisfied with surgery. Range of motion remained poorer in the contracture group and a higher percentage had residual contractures (P < .001). Ten-year survivorship was 94% and 97% in the control and contracture groups, respectively (P = .145).

CONCLUSION

Although patients with severe flexion contractures had a poorer range of motion and postoperatively, these patients attained comparable PROMs, satisfaction rates, and mid-term survivorship after UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, therapeutic study.

Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations

Robotic technology has reduced the errors of implant alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), but its impact on functional recovery after UKA is poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to compare early functional recovery, pain levels, and satisfaction in UKA performed with either robotic assistance or conventional methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 89 matched consecutive patients who underwent outpatient UKA by a single physician using either conventional instruments (n = 39) or robotic methods (n = 50), with otherwise identical perioperative protocols. Outcomes studied included Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), new Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR.), VR/SF-12, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and perioperative opioid consumption. Patients in the robotic cohort had superior early functional outcomes, with greater LEFS (conventional = 23; robotic = 31) at 1 week post-op (p=0.015) and KOOS-JR (conventional = 74; robotic = 81) at up to 6 months post-op (p=0.037); these two values remained statistically significant after mixed-model regression analysis (p=0.010; p=0.023), respectively. At 1 year post-op, expectations were more likely to be met in those who received robotic assistance (p=0.06). No differences were reported with respect to postoperative opioid usage (p=0.320), reoperations (p=1.00), and complications (p=0.628). Robotic-assisted UKA resulted in more rapid recovery and less early postoperative pain and were more likely to meet expectations than conventional UKA, although functional differences equilibrated by 1 year postoperatively. Further follow-up is necessary to determine if implant durability is impacted by robotics.

Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Customized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA) utilizes implants manufactured on an individual patient basis, derived from pre-operative computed tomography images in an effort to more closely approximate the natural anatomy of the knee. The outcomes from 349 medial and lateral fixed-bearing C-UKA were reviewed. Implant survivorship analysis was conducted via retrospective chart review, and follow-up analysis was conducted via a single postoperative phone call or email. The rate of follow-up was 69% (242 knees). The average age at surgery was 71.1 years and the average body mass index was 28.8 kg/m2. Seven revision arthroplasties (2.1%) had knowingly been performed at an average of 1.9 years postoperatively (range: 0.1-3.9 years), resulting in an implant survivorship of 97.9% at an average follow-up of 4.2 years (range: 0.1-8.7) and 97.9% at an average of 4.8 years (range: 2.0-8.7) when knees with less than two years of follow-up were excluded. The reasons for revision were implant loosening (one knee), infection (two knees), progression of osteoarthritis (two knees), and unknown reasons (two knees). The average KOOS, JR. interval score was 84 (SD: 14.4). Of those able to be contacted for follow-up analysis, 67% were "very satisfied," 26% were "satisfied," 4% were "neutral," 2% were "dissatisfied," and 1% were "very dissatisfied." When asked if the knee felt "natural," 60% responded with "always," 35% responded with "sometimes," and 5% responded with "never." After analyzing a large cohort of C-UKA, we found favorable rates of survivorship, satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes.

Costs of unicompartmental compared with total knee arthroplasty : a matched cohort study over ten years

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare ten-year longitudinal healthcare costs and revision rates for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The Humana database was used to compare 2,383 patients undergoing UKA between 2007 and 2009, who were matched 1:1 from a cohort of 63,036 patients undergoing primary TKA based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Medical and surgical complications were tracked longitudinally for one year following surgery. Rates of revision surgery and cumulative mean healthcare costs were recorded for this period of time and compared between the cohorts.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing TKA had significantly higher rates of manipulation under anaesthesia (3.9% vs 0.9%; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (5.0% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (1.5% vs 0.8%; p = 0.001), and renal failure (4.2% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001). Revision rates, however, were significantly higher for UKA at five years (6.0% vs 4.2%; p = 0.007) and ten years postoperatively (6.5% vs 4.4%; p = 0.002). Longitudinal-related healthcare costs for patients undergoing TKA were greater than for those undergoing UKA at one year ($24,771 vs $22,071; p < 0.001) and five years following surgery ($26,549 vs $25,730; p < 0.001); however, the mean costs of TKA were comparable to UKA at ten years ($26,877 vs $26,891; p = 0.425).

CONCLUSION

Despite higher revision rates, patients undergoing UKA had lower mean healthcare costs than those undergoing TKA up to ten years following the procedure, at which time costs were comparable. In the era of value-based care, surgeons and policymakers should be aware of the costs involved with these procedures. UKA was associated with fewer complications at one year postoperatively but higher revision rates at five and ten years. While UKA was significantly less costly than TKA at one and five years, costs at ten years were comparable with a mean difference of only $14. Lowering the risk of revision surgery should be targeted as a source of cost savings for both UKA and TKA as the mean related healthcare costs were 2.5-fold higher in patients requiring revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):23-31.

Disappointing Relationship between Functional Performance and Patient Satisfaction of UKA Patients: A Cross Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Following a Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) satisfaction is often conflated with functional outcome. Recent studies have shown that satisfaction is not linked to functional outcome. The research questions were: (1) what is the relationship between satisfaction and functional performance and quality of life (absolute and gain values) after UKA? And (2) what is the level of satisfaction, function, and quality of life after UKA?

HYPOTHESIS

There is a poor relationship between functional performance and patient satisfaction following UKA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using a locally held arthroplasty register to identify patients who had undergone UKA between 2004 and 2017. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively and included EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction score (based on a visual analogue score with 0 being worst and 100 being best). Patients with a complete set of pre-operative and 2-year post-operative outcome scores were included. Patients who subsequently underwent revision surgery were excluded. 1638 patients were identified, of which 896 were eligible for inclusion. The average age was 66.7 years old, with 46.3% of patients being female.

RESULTS

There was a moderate to strong correlation between the absolute or relative values for OKS and the patient satisfaction following UKA (r=0.705 and r=0.522, respectively). The average pre-operative scores improved from a median of 23 (IQR 18-28) to 43 (IQR 35-46) (p<0.001) and from a median of 0.62 (IQR 0.186-0.691) to 0.85 (IQR 0.691 - 1) (p<0.001) for OKS and EQ-5D, respectively. In terms of satisfaction with outcome, 82.6% of patients were very satisfied and 4.4% were dissatisfied (scoring ≥80% and <50%, respectively). At 2 years, the PASS was met or surpassed by 73.1% and 54.9% (OKS and EQ-5D, respectively). The MCID was met or surpassed by 93% and 78% (OKS and EQ-5D, respectively).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

UKA is a successful procedure generating high levels of patient function and satisfaction. Because patients' OKS and EQ-5D scores may be influenced by comorbidities, those scores are of disappointing predictive value in estimating patient satisfaction, and therefore should not be used as a surrogate to determine the success of the UKA procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Restrospective cohort study.

Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up After Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Isolated Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to compare the long-term functional outcome and quality of life between total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for the treatment of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2008, a total of 218 patients underwent primary UKA at our tertiary hospital. A TKA group was matched through 1:1 propensity score matching and adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, preoperative knee flexion, and function scores. All patients had medial compartment osteoarthritis. The patients were assessed with the range of motion, Knee Society Knee Score and Knee Society Function Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short Form-36 physical component score (PCS) and mental component score preoperatively, at 6 months, 2 years, and 10 years. Patients' satisfaction, expectation fulfillment, and minimal clinically important difference were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups after propensity score matching (P > .05). UKA had greater knee flexion at all time points. Although the Knee Society Function Score was superior in UKA by 5.5, 3, and 4.3 points at 6 months, 2 years, and 10 years, respectively (P < .001), these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (Knee Society Knee Score 6.1). There were no significant differences in the Oxford Knee Score and Short Form-36 physical component score/mental component score. At 10 years, similar proportions of UKA and TKA were satisfied (90.8% vs 89.9%, P = .44) and had expectation fulfillment (89.4% vs 88.5%, P = .46). Between 2 and 10 years, all function scores deteriorated significantly for both groups (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

UKA and TKA are excellent treatment modalities for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis, with similar functional outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction at 10 years.

Increased Operative Time Impacts Rates of Short-Term Complications After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence has demonstrated an exacerbating effect of increased operative time on short-term complications in total joint arthroplasty. While the same relationship may be expected for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), supporting evidence remains sparse. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of operative time on short-term complication rates after UKA and determine a critical threshold in operative times after which complications may increase.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project was queried from 2007 to 2018 to identify 11,633 UKA procedures that were included in the final analysis. The effect of operative time on complications within 30 days was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models. Receiver operating characteristics curves and spline regression models were used to identify critical thresholds in operative time that increase the likelihood of short-term complications.

RESULTS

Longer operative times (in minutes) were associated with higher rates of surgical site infection (90.4 ± 26.7 vs 84.8 ± 25.5, P = .003), blood transfusions (94.9 ± 28.6 vs 84.9 ± 25.5, P = .007), as well as reoperation rates (90.8 ± 27.9 vs 84.9 ± 25.5, P = .01), extended hospital length of stay (93.4 ± 29.8 vs 84.5 ± 25.2, P < .001), and mortality (110.4 ± 35.5 vs 84.9 ± 25.5, P = .008). Following multivariate logistic regression, operative time was found to independently predict increased surgical site infection, blood transfusion, myocardial infarction, extended length of stay, and mortality (odds ratio: 1.09 - 1.45, CI: 1.01 - 1.91, all P values <0.02). Receiver operating characteristics curves found an increase in mortality risk during the 30-day postoperative period after 88.5 minutes of operative time, a finding supported by spline regression plots.

CONCLUSION

The present study found a positive correlation between increased operative times and short-term postoperative complication rates after UKA. Despite a statistically significant association with increasing operative time, odds ratios of reported complications are relatively low.

Unicondylar knee replacement versus total knee replacement for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Since the optimal surgery for isolated medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear, this study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of unicondylar knee replacement (UKR) with total knee replacement (TKR) for simple medial knee OA.

METHODS

Literature searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to 1th April 2020. Only studies comparing UKR with TKR for isolated medial knee OA were included. Data collection and extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles with 1888 patients were included, among which, 944 and 944 underwent UKR and TKR, respectively. The analyzed postoperative outcomes were mostly within 5 years of follow-up. The meta-analysis showed that UKR improved knee general function (P < 0.00001) and health (P = 0.02), moreover, reduced post-operative pain (P = 0.01) and complications (P < 0.05) more than TKR. There were no significant differences in postoperative revision (P = 0.252), high-activity arthroplasty score (HAAS) (P = 0.307) and Oxford knee score (OKS) (P = 0.15) between the two techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients of UKR could achieve better clinical results than that of TKR, moreover, there were negligible differences between the two techniques in postoperative revision in the early and mid-term follow-up and surgeons should be aware of the important reasons for revision of UKR. Thus, UKR instead of TKR should be performed in patients with late-stage isolated medial knee OA.

Ten-Year Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Psychological Distress

BACKGROUND

Although the influence of psychological distress on the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty has been described extensively, its effect on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is poorly defined. Furthermore, most studies in arthroplasty literature had short follow-ups of ≤1 year. We investigated the influence of psychological distress on long-term patient-reported outcomes and analyzed the change in mental health after UKA in a cohort with minimum 10 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 269 patients undergoing UKA in 2004-2007 were reviewed. Patients were stratified into those with psychological distress (36-item Short-Form health survey [SF-36] Mental Component Summary [MCS] <50, n = 111) and those without (SF-36 MCS ≥50, n = 158). Clinical outcomes were obtained preoperatively, at 2 years, and 10 years. Multiple regression was used to control for age, gender, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and baseline scores. The rate of expectation fulfillment and satisfaction was compared.

RESULTS

Psychologically distressed patients had poorer Knee Society Knee Score, Function Score, Oxford Knee Score, and SF-36 Physical Component Summary preoperatively, at 2 years, and 10 years. However, an equal proportion in each group attained the minimal clinically important difference for each score. Distressed patients had a comparable rate of satisfaction (91% vs 95%, P = .136) but lower fulfillment of expectations (89% vs 95%, P = .048). The percentage of distressed patients declined from 41% to 35% at follow-up. The mean SF-36 MCS improved by 6.9 points.

CONCLUSION

Although psychologically distressed patients had relatively greater pain and poorer function preoperatively and up to 10 years after UKA, a similar proportion of them experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcomes.

Does new instrument for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improve short-term clinical outcome and component alignment? A meta-analysis

Background

The Microplasty (MP) instrumentation designed for the Phase III Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) system is considered a better option to achieve more accurate component positioning and alignment. In the present study, we focused on short-term clinical and radiological outcomes to determine whether the MP instrumentation can reduce the short-term revision rate and occurrence of outliers of metallic components.

Methods

The literature in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was searched up to May 2020. Studies were scrutinized by two independent authors, and the revision rate, complication spectrum, and radiological assessment with outlier rates were specifically analyzed. RevMan 5.3 was used for the statistical analysis.

Results

Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Four studies reported both clinical and radiological outcomes, two reported only radiological outcomes, and one reported only clinical outcomes. The pooled analysis showed that the revision rate in the MP instrumentation group was 0.866 per 100 component years, while that in the control group was 1.124 (odds ratio, 0.77; p < 0.05). The subgroup analysis of the bearing dislocation rate showed a significantly greater reduction in the Korean population than in the populations of other countries (p < 0.05). The radiological assessment showed that the alignment of the femoral component was significantly improved (p < 0.05), while that of the tibial component was not (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The newly developed MP instrumentation for Oxford UKA significantly reduced the revision rate of this treatment. The positioning of the femoral component was also proven to be better by radiological assessments.

What Is the Critical Tibial Resection Depth During Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Biomechanical Study of Fracture Risk

BACKGROUND

Fracture after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a rare complication. Biomechanical studies evaluating association between depth of resection and maximum load to failure are lacking. The purpose of this study is to establish the relationship between depth of resection of the medial tibial plateau and mean maximum load to failure.

METHODS

Medial tibial resections were performed from 2 to 10 mm in 25 standardized fourth-generation Sawbones composite tibias (Sawbones, Vashon Island, Washington). A metal-backed tibial component with a 9-mm polyethylene bearing was used (Stryker PKR). Tibias were mounted on a biomechanical testing apparatus (MTESTQuattro) and axially loaded cyclically 10 times per cycle and incrementally increased until failure occurred.

RESULTS

Load to failure was recorded in 25 proximal tibia model samples after medial UKA using sequential resections from 2 to 10 mm. Analysis of variance testing identified significant differences in mean maximum load to failure between groups (P = .0003). Analysis of regression models revealed a statistically significant fit of a quadratic model (R² = 0.59, P = .0001). The inflection point of this quadratic curve was identified at 5.82 mm, indicating that the maximum load to failure across experimental models in this study began to decline beyond a resection depth of 5.82 mm.

CONCLUSION

In this biomechanical model, medial tibial resections beyond 5.82 mm produced a significantly lower mean load to failure using a quadratic curve model. Resections from 2 to 6 mm showed no significant differences in mean load to failure. Identification of the tibial resection depth at which the mean load to failure significantly decreases is clinically relevant as this depth may increase the risk of periprosthetic fracture after a medial UKA.

General Anesthesia Leads to Increased Adverse Events Compared With Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The volume of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased dramatically in recent years with good reported long-term outcomes. UKA can be performed under general or neuraxial (ie, spinal) anesthesia; however, little is known as to whether there is a difference in outcomes based on anesthesia type. The purpose of the present study is to compare perioperative outcomes between anesthesia types for patients undergoing primary elective UKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary elective UKA from 2007 to 2017 were identified from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Operating room times, length of stay (LOS), 30-day adverse events, and readmission rates were compared between patients who received general anesthesia and those who received spinal anesthesia. Propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis was used to control for selection bias and baseline patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 8639 patients underwent UKA and met the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 4728 patients (54.7%) received general anesthesia and 3911 patients (45.3%) received spinal anesthesia. On propensity-adjusted multivariate analyses, general anesthesia was associated with increased operative time (P < .001) and the occurrence of any severe adverse event (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.04-1.84; P = .024). In addition, general anesthesia was associated with higher rates of deep venous thrombosis (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.11-4.6; P = .024) and superficial surgical site infection (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.6-1.81; P < .001). Finally, general anesthesia was also associated with a reduced likelihood of discharge to home (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P < .001). No difference existed in postoperative hospital LOS or readmission rates among cohorts.

CONCLUSION

General anesthesia was associated with an increased rate of adverse events and increased operating room times as well as a reduced likelihood of discharge to home. There was no difference in hospital LOS or postoperative readmission rates between anesthesia types.

Treatment and Outcome of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a devastating but poorly understood complication, with a paucity of published data regarding treatment and outcomes. This study analyzes the largest cohort of UKA PJIs to date comparing treatment outcome, septic and aseptic reoperation rates, and risk factors for treatment failure.

METHODS

Twenty-one UKAs in 21 patients treated for PJI, as defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, were retrospectively reviewed. Minimum and mean follow-up was 1 and 3.5 years, respectively. Fourteen (67%) patients had acute postoperative PJIs. Surgical treatment included 16 debridement, antibiotics, and implant retentions (DAIRs) (76%), 4 two-stage revisions (19%), and 1 one-stage revision (5%). Twenty (95%) PJIs were culture positive with Staphylococcus species identified in 15 cases (71%).

RESULTS

Survivorship free from reoperation for infection at 1 year was 76% (95% confidence interval, 58%-93%). Overall survival from all-cause reoperation was 57% (95% confidence interval, 27%-87%) at 5 years. Two additional patients (10%) underwent aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty for lateral compartment degeneration 1 year after DAIR and tibial aseptic loosening 2.5 years after 2-stage revision. All patients who initially failed PJI UKA treatment presented with acute postoperative PJIs (5 of 14; 36%).

CONCLUSION

Survivorship free from persistent PJI at 1 year is low at 76% but is consistent with similar reports of DAIRs for total knee arthroplasties. Furthermore, there is low survivorship free from all-cause reoperation of 71% and 57% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Surgeons should be aware of these poorer outcomes and consider treating UKA PJI early and aggressively.

Reimbursement and Complications in Outpatient vs Inpatient Unicompartmental Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Increasing utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has driven a greater push for outpatient treatment and cost containment in the setting of bundled payments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate utilization trends of inpatient vs outpatient UKA, index episode and 90-day reimbursement, and any differences in medical or surgical complications.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was employed to identify all inpatient and outpatient UKAs performed between 2007 and 2016 with 2-year follow-up. Patients were matched by age, gender, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. We tracked index procedure and global period reimbursement, 90-day medical and surgical complications, and 2-year surgical complications.

RESULTS

The reimbursement and utilization cohort included 3181 outpatient and 5490 inpatient UKAs. Outpatient UKA and overall utilization of UKA increased over the study period. Mean index reimbursement of inpatient UKA was $2486.16 higher per procedure (P < .001) while mean global period reimbursement was $2782.13 higher per inpatient procedure (P < .001). Ninety-day medical complications including postoperative anemia (P < .001), transfusion (P = .024), and arrhythmia (P = .004) were more common with inpatient UKAs, whereas surgical wound complications (P = .001) and operative debridement (P = .028) were more common among outpatient UKAs. Outpatient UKA was not associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (P > .05), aseptic loosening (P > .05), or revision surgery (P > .05) when compared to inpatient UKA.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient UKA utilization is increasing and is associated with decreased reimbursement compared to inpatient UKA without increased risk of major medical complications, although it is associated with increased risk of wound complication and need for operative debridement at 90 days.