Clinical and Administrative Databases Used in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty Research

Inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty have higher odds of implant-related complications

PURPOSE

This study evaluates whether IBD patients are at increased risk of implant-related complications after THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study from 01 January 2010 to 31 October 31 2020 using an administrative claims database was performed. IBD patients undergoing THA (n = 11,025), without corticosteroid treatment, were propensity score matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio (n = 55,121) based on age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Outcomes evaluated included periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, prosthetic joint infection, and THA revision within 2 years of index procedure. Chi-square analyses were used to compare the matched cohorts. The association of IBD and implant-related complications was evaluated using logistical regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and p-values. A p-value < 0.001 was used as the significance threshold.

RESULTS

Patients with IBD had a greater incidence and odds of total implant complications (7.03% vs. 3.98%; OR 1.76; p < 0.001) compared with matched controls. IBD patients had significantly higher incidence and odds of developing periprosthetic fracture (0.50% vs. 0.20%; OR 2.46; p < 0.001), THA revisions (2.21% vs. 1.17%; OR 1.91; p < 0.001), aseptic loosening (1.45% vs. 0.84%; OR 1.75; p < 0.001), and prosthetic joint infection (2.87% vs. 1.77%; OR 1.64; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD who underwent primary THA had a significantly higher risk of implant-related complications compared to matched controls. Providers should use this study to appropriately assess post-complication risk factors for their patients with IBD.

Operative Time Associated With Increased Length of Stay After Single-level Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 3681 Surgeries

STUDY DESIGN

Level III evidence-retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to (1) determine whether longer CDA operative time increases the risk of 30-day postoperative complications, (2) analyze the association between operative time and subsequent health care utilization, and (3) discharge disposition.

BACKGROUND

Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) most commonly serves as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical spine disease, however, with only 1600 CDAs performed annually relative to 132,000 ACDFs, it is a relatively novel procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective query was performed identifying patients who underwent single-level CDA between January 2012 and December 2018 using a nationwide database. Differences in baseline patient demographics were identified through univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify associations between operative time (reference: 81-100 min), medical/surgical complications, and health care utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 3681 cases were performed, with a mean patient age of 45.52 years and operative time of 107.72±49.6 minutes. Higher odds of length of stay were demonstrated starting with operative time category 101-120 minutes (odds ratio: 2.164, 95% CI: 1.247-3.754, P=0.006); however, not among discharge destination, 30-day unplanned readmission, or reoperation. Operative time <40 minutes was associated with 10.7x odds of nonhome discharge, while >240 minutes was associated with 4.4 times higher odds of LOS>2 days (P<0.01). Increased operative time was not associated with higher odds of wound complication/infection, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, or urinary tract infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged CDA operative time above the reference 81-100 minutes is independently associated with increased length of stay, but not other significant health care utilization parameters, including discharge disposition, readmission, or reoperation. There was no association between prolonged operative time and 30-day medical/surgical complications, including wound complications, infections, pulmonary embolism, or urinary tract infection.

Risk Factors for Undergoing Surgical Intervention for Vertebral Compression Fractures: An Analysis of 703,499 Patients

BACKGROUND

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are typically treated nonoperatively but can be treated with either kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty when indicated. The decision to treat patients with/without surgical intervention is dependent on the severity of deformity and patient risk profile. The aims of this study were to: 1) compare baseline patient demographics, 2) identify risk factors of patients undergoing operative vs. nonoperative management, and 3) identify patient-specific risk factors associated with postoperative readmissions.

METHODS

This retrospective database study used patient information from January 1st, 2010, to October 31st, 2021. Cohorts were identified by patients diagnosed with VCFs through International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), ICD-10 codes, identifying those undergoing kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty via Current Procedural Terminology codes. The 2 research domains utilized in this investigation were baseline demographic profiles of patients who underwent kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for treatment of VCFs, and those who underwent nonoperative management served as the control cohort.

RESULTS

Of the 703,499 patients diagnosed with VCFs, 76,126 patients (10.8%) underwent kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty within 90 days of diagnosis of a VCF. Univariate analysis demonstrated female sex was associated with increased risk of undergoing surgical management for VCF (P < 0.0001). Several comorbidities were significantly associated with increased rates of readmission including hypertension, tobacco use, coronary artery disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < 0.0001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights specific comorbidities that are significantly associated with higher rates of kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for the treatment of thoracolumbar wedge compression fractures and increased risk for 90-day postoperative hospital readmission.

The Association of Dental Caries or Dental Implant Placement Within One Year of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty on Medical and Implant Complications

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) adverse events among patients who have dental diagnoses remain unclear. We sought to determine if dental caries or dental implant placements increased (1) 90-day medical complications, (2) 90-day readmissions, and (3) 2-year implant-related complications, including periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after THA.

METHODS

A nationwide database for primary THAs from 2010 to 2021 was queried to compare 3 patient cohorts. Patients who had a history of dental implants or caries within 12 months prior to THA (n = 1,179) or 12 months after THA (n = 1,218) were case-matched to patients who did not have dental history (n = 6,090) by age and comorbidities. Outcomes included 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and 2-year implant-related complications. Logistic regression models computed the odds ratios (ORs) of complications and readmissions. P values less than .006 were significant.

RESULTS

Patients who had dental caries or implant placement 12 months before or after THA experienced 1.6-fold greater odds of 90-day medical complications compared to case-matched patients. Readmissions within 90 days increased for patients who had a dental history before (11.7% versus 8.3%; OR: 1.49, P < .0001) and after (14.2% versus 8.3%; OR: 1.84, P < .0001) THA compared to case-matched patients. A dental caries diagnosis or dental implant placement within 12 months following THA increased 2-year implant complications compared to case-matched patients (15.2% versus 9.3%; OR: 1.69, P < .0001), including PJIs (5.3% versus 2.8%; OR: 1.98, P < .0001), dislocations (4.4% versus 2.7%; OR: 1.63, P = .002), and THA revisions (3.9% versus 2.5%; OR: 1.61, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Dental diagnoses within 12 months of THA are associated with increased medical complications. Dental diagnoses occurring 12 months after THA are associated with greater implant-related complications, including PJIs. Delaying invasive dental procedures for 12 months after THA may be advisable.

The Impact of Cardiac Arrhythmias on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cardiac comorbidities are common in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While there is an abundance of research showing an association between cardiac abnormalities and poor postoperative outcomes, relatively little is published on specific pathologies. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of cardiac arrhythmias on postoperative outcomes in the setting of TKA.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients undergoing TKA from a national database, from 2016 to 2019. Patients who had cardiac arrhythmias were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and Clinical Modification/Procedure Coding System codes and served as the cohort of interest. Multivariate regression was performed to compare postoperative outcomes. Gamma regression was performed to assess length of stay and total charges, while negative binomial regression was used to assess 30-day readmission and reoperation. Patient demographic variables and comorbidities, measured via the Elixhauser comorbidity index, were controlled in our regression analysis. Out of a total of 1,906,670 patients, 224,434 (11.76%) had a diagnosed arrhythmia and were included in our analyses.

RESULTS

Those who had arrhythmias had greater odds of both medical (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; P < .001) and surgical complications (OR 2.27; P < .001). They also had greater readmission (OR 2.49; P < .001) and reoperation (OR 1.93; P < .001) within 30 days, longer hospital stays (OR 1.07; P < .001), and greater total charges (OR 1.02; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac arrhythmia is a common comorbidity in the TKA population and is associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Patients who had arrhythmias had greater odds of both medical and surgical complications requiring readmission or reoperation.

STUDY DESIGN

Level III; Retrospective Cohort Study.

Risk Factors for Readmission Following Surgical Decompression for Spinal Epidural Abscesses: An Analysis of 4595 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to (1) compare baseline demographics of patients undergoing surgery for SEA who were/were not readmitted; (2) identify risk factors for 90-day readmissions; and (3) quantify 90-day episode-of-care health care costs.

BACKGROUND

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA), while rare, occurring ~2.5-5.1/10,000 admissions, may lead to permanent neurologic deficits and mortality. Definitive treatment often involves surgical intervention via decompression.

METHODS

A search of the PearlDiver database from 2010 to 2021 for patients undergoing decompression for SEA identified 4595 patients. Cohorts were identified through the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Baseline demographics of patients who were/were not readmitted within 90 days following decompression were aggregated/compared, identifying factors associated with readmission. Using Bonferroni correction, a P-value<0.001 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Readmission within 90 days of surgical decompression occurred in 36.1% (1659/4595) of patients. While age/gender were not associated with readmission rate, alcohol use disorder, arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease, ischemic heart disease, and obesity were associated with readmission. Readmission risk factors included fluid/electrolyte abnormalities, obesity, paralysis, tobacco use, and pathologic weight loss (P<0.0001). Mean same-day total costs ($17,920 vs. $8204, P<0.001) and mean 90-day costs ($46,050 vs. $15,200, P<0.001) were significantly higher in the readmission group.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of patients (36.1%) are readmitted within 90 days following surgical decompression for SEA. The top 5 risk factors in descending order are fluid/electrolyte abnormalities, pathologic weight loss, tobacco use, pre-existing paralysis, and obesity. This study highlights areas for perioperative medical optimization that may reduce health care utilization.

Miscoding in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database Raises Questions About Validity for Arthroplasty Research

BACKGROUND

The use of administrative databases in arthroplasty research has increased over the past decade. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) is one of the first and most frequently used. Despite many published articles using this dataset, there exists no standardization resource accounting for the potential of biased results. The purpose of our study was to assess the amount of discordant data between clinically relevant variables and propose a standard for using this database in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

An initial set of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty were identified from the NIS between 2016 and 2019 using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Procedure Coding System. All records with THA and TKA in any of the procedure variables (PR1-PR20) were included. A total of 63 relevant and consistent variables were selected for individual comparison including diagnosis-related group (1), elective (1), procedure codes (20), day of main procedure (1), and diagnosis codes (40). Descriptive statistics were used. A total of 3,562,819 patients were included in the initial set.

RESULTS

Using diagnosis-related groups, 5.3% were revision surgeries, 4.7% were not elective, 2.3% did not have THA or TKA as their primary procedure for hospitalization, and 2.9% of THA and 9.7% of TKA were bilateral. A total of 6.2% of the surgeries were done day(s) before or after admission, and 10.8% of THA and 6.3% of TKA were missing an orthopedic diagnosis for admission. Many had multiple orthopedic diagnoses for admission, 3.2% of THA and 0.7% of TKA. Overall miscoding was 23.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the NIS without standardized data processing to study elective, unilateral, primary THA and TKA introduces major bias. A logical and stepwise approach to curate the data before analysis is proposed to improve research quality when using this database in hip and knee arthroplasty studies.

Decreasing trend of inpatient mortality rates of aseptic versus septic revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 681,034 cases

BACKGROUND

While most revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs) are for aseptic loosening/instability, infection accounts for approximately 16%. The purpose of this study was to: (1) quantify mortality rates of aseptic versus septic rTHA; (2) determine if mortality rates have changed over the past 20 years; and (3) identify associated preoperative risk factors, focusing on the utility/validity of the Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI).

METHODS

ICD-9/ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients undergoing rTHA in the National Inpatient Sample database between 1998 and 2017. A total of 681,034 cases (576,143 aseptic THA and 104,891 septic THA) were identified. For each patient, demographic variables including age, sex, race, insurance type, ECI, and inhospital mortality were gathered. A logistic regression model was constructed to assess risk of inhospital mortality.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2017, inpatient mortality rates of aseptic and septic rTHA decreased from 0.83 to 0.45%, and from 2.58 to 1.24%, respectively. Septic rTHA was independently associated with higher odds of mortality relative to aseptic (odds ratio (OR): 2.305, 95% confidence interval (CI): (2.014, 2.638), p < 0.0001). Increased ECI was associated with higher odds of mortality at both medium (OR: 5.147, 95% CI: (4.433,5.977), p < 0.0001) and high index scores (OR: 13.714, 95% CI: (11.519,16.326), p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality rates for both aseptic and septic rTHA have been declining over the past 20 years, potentially due to patient selection guidelines and advances in medical management. Our study confirms that the ECI is independently associated with increased inpatient mortality.

Surgical Trends for Managing Knee Osteonecrosis: A 2010 to 2020 United States Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

Knee osteonecrosis (ON) is rare, with an estimated incidence of 0.01-0.17 per 1,000 person years. Our study aimed to do the following: 1) quantify total operative procedures with rates normalized to the United States population; 2) compare arthroplasty versus joint-preserving procedural trends; and 3) determine rates of specific operative techniques/demographics in patients aged <50 versus >50 years.

METHODS

Using a nationwide database, 8,269 patients diagnosed with knee ON underwent surgical treatment from 2010 to 2020. Documented surgical procedures included total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and core decompression. Primary outcomes included procedural utilization with subanalyses comparing arthroplasty versus joint-preserving procedures, and age-stratified by under/over 50 years. Linear regressions were evaluated for trends in procedural volumes over time.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2014, 0.54% of all knee procedures were to treat ON compared to 0.71% from 2015 to 2020 (P < .001). Overall rates of TKA (85.4%) and UKA (10.3%) far exceeded rates of joint preserving procedures (4.3%). Comparing 2010-2014 with 2015-2019, joint-preserving procedures proportionally increased (0.7 to 5.0%, P < .001). Patients <50 years had significantly more joint-preserving procedures (19.5 versus 2.7%). Overall, TKA was the most common procedure (7,062; 85.40%), following by UKA 853; 10.32%) and core decompression (354; 4.28%).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize surgical trends in management of knee ON. Overall surgical volume for knee ON has continued to increase, outpacing population growth. Patients who have knee ON are most commonly managed with arthroplasty procedures, specifically TKA. Younger aged patients (<50 years) are more likely to undergo joint-preserving procedures, namely core decompression.

Is the American Joint Replacement Registry Able to Correctly Classify Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedural Diagnoses?

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) is a powerful tool for the study of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The AJRR uses International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10-CM) codes for recording surgical diagnoses. However, the validity of this methodology is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes, as used by AJRR, in classifying rTKA diagnoses.

METHODS

There were 988 rTKAs performed from 2015 to 2021 identified in our institutional total joint registry (TJR). Revision diagnoses were obtained from TJR, in which trained abstractors prospectively record diagnoses independent of ICD-10-CM data. The ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes submitted to AJRR were retrieved for the same procedures. The accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes for classifying rTKA diagnoses as septic versus aseptic, aseptic loosening, instability, and periprosthetic fracture was assessed using Cohen's Kappa statistics, sensitivities, and specificities.

RESULTS

Concordance between AJRR-submitted codes and TJR was excellent (97.3%, k = 0.9) for identifying septic versus aseptic revisions. Agreement for aseptic diagnoses varied from very good for loosening (k = 0.65) and instability (k = 0.64) to fair for periprosthetic fracture (k = 0.36). Specificity was high (> 94%) for all three diagnoses, but sensitivity was lower at 71%, 63%, and 28% for loosening, instability, and periprosthetic fracture, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AJRR submitted ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes correctly classified rTKA cases as septic or aseptic with remarkable accuracy, but accuracy for more granular diagnoses varied. These data demonstrate the potential for diagnosis-specific limitations when using administrative claims data for registry reporting and have important implications for researchers using ICD-10-CM data.

Increasing trend toward joint-preserving procedures for hip osteonecrosis in the United States from 2010 to 2019

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head is estimated at about 10 to 20,000 patients annually, and, when left untreated, 80% or more of cases progress to femoral head collapse. A series of joint-preserving procedures have been developed to prevent/delay the need for hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to provide a five-year update: (1) evaluating temporal trends of arthroplasty vs. joint-preservation techniques such as core decompression, bone grafting, osteotomies, and arthroscopy; (2) determining proportions of procedures in patients aged less than vs. over 50 years; and (3) quantifying rates of specific operative techniques.

METHODS

A total of 10,334 patients diagnosed with osteonecrosis of the femoral head and having received hip surgery were identified from a nationwide database between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019, by using the International Classification of Disease, the Ninth/Tenth revision (ICD-9/10) codes. The percentage of patients managed by each operative procedure was calculated annually. To identify trends, patients were grouped by age under/over 50 years and divided into a joint-preserving and a non-joint-preserving (arthroplasty) group. Chi-squared tests were performed to compare the total number of procedures per year.

RESULTS

Rates of arthroplasty far exceeded those for joint-preserving procedures. However, from 2015 to 2019, significantly more joint-preserving procedures were performed than in 2010 to 2014 (4.3% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001). Significantly more joint-preserving procedures were performed in patients aged < 50 years relative to those ≥ 50 years (7.56% vs. 1.86%, P < 0.001). Overall, total hip arthroplasty was the most common procedure (9,814; 94.97%) relative to core decompression (331; 3.20%), hemiarthroplasty/resurfacing (102; 0.99%), bone grafting (48; 0.46%), and osteotomy (5; 0.05%).

CONCLUSION

Management of patients who have osteonecrosis of the femoral head continues to be predominantly arthroplasty procedures, specifically, total hip arthroplasty. Our findings suggest a small, but significant trend toward increased joint-preserving procedures, especially in patients under 50 years. In particular, the proportion of patients receiving core decompression has increased significantly from 2015 to 2019 relative to prior years.

Impact of Large Database Studies on Orthopedic Surgery Literature: Are We Advancing the Field?

Background: While database studies have become more prevalent in the literature, there is concern over their value. In addition, the questions they are suitable to answer are limited. Questions/Purposes: We sought to determine the incidence of database studies in the orthopedic literature and in each subspecialty. In addition, we wanted to assess the impact of database studies on the literature by determining whether citations and Altmetric Attention Scores (AAS) varied by study type (studies using internal or external databases and those not using databases). Methods: We searched PubMed for articles published in impactful orthopedic surgery journals in the year 2018. All articles were discoverable on the Altmetric explorer portal database. Impact was determined by journal impact factor. Study design, subspecialty, number of citations, and AAS were obtained. Univariable analyses were conducted between study type, demographic variables, and the outcome of either citation count or AAS. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of the primary outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed to differentiate the impact of external and internal database studies compared with non-database studies. Results: A total of 2684 total articles were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 366 studies (13.6%) were database studies. Hip and knee articles had the greatest incidence of database studies. Database studies had significantly more citations (5.9 vs 4.0) and significantly higher AAS (12.8 vs 11.3) compared with non-database studies. External database studies had significantly more citations (6.7 vs 4.8) and significantly higher AAS (14.0 vs 10.7) than internal database studies. Internal database studies had higher traditional citation counts but similar AAS to non-database studies. Conclusions: In 2018, database studies in well-reputed orthopedic journals had a greater number of citations but similar AAS compared with non-database studies. Further studies are warranted.

Can the American Joint Replacement Registry Utilize Administrative Claims Data to Accurately Classify Revision THA Surgical Diagnoses?

INTRODUCTION

The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) is a valuable tool for studying revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Currently, International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes are utilized by AJRR for classifying surgical diagnoses. However, the validity of this methodology is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of these codes, as used by AJRR, in classifying rTHA diagnoses.

METHODS

We identified 908 rTHAs performed at our institution from 2015 to 2021 using our total joint registry (TJR). Revision diagnoses were obtained from TJR, which contains prospectively recorded surgical diagnoses collected by trained abstractors, independent from ICD-10 data. The ICD-10 diagnosis codes, as submitted to AJRR, were retrieved for the same procedures. The accuracy of ICD-10 codes for classifying rTHA diagnoses as septic versus aseptic, instability, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture was assessed using Cohen's Kappa statistic, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Concordance between AJRR submitted data and TJR for classifying rTHA as septic or aseptic was excellent (96.9%; k=0.87). Agreement for aseptic diagnoses varied from very good for instability (k=0.76) and loosening (k=0.67) to moderate for periprosthetic fracture (k=0.54). Specificity was high (>96%) for all three aseptic diagnoses, but sensitivity was lower at 74, 68, and 44% for instability, loosening, and periprosthetic fracture, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AJRR submitted ICD-10 data correctly classifies the infection status of rTHA procedures with outstanding accuracy, but the accuracy for more granular diagnoses was variable. These data demonstrate the potential for diagnosis specific limitations when utilizing ICD-10 administrative claims for registry reporting.

Trends in Surgical Management of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A 2010 to 2020 Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is estimated at more than 20,000 patients annually in the US. Our study aimed to provide a 10-year analysis: 1) evaluating total operative procedures with rates normalized to the population; 2) determining trends of arthroplasty versus joint-preserving procedures; and 3) quantifying specific operative techniques in patients <50 versus >50 years of age.

METHODS

A total of 64,739 patients who were diagnosed with ONFH and underwent hip surgery were identified from a nationwide database between 2010 and 2020. The percentage of patients managed by each operative procedure was calculated and normalized to the overall population annually. Patients were grouped into joint-preserving versus non-joint-preserving (arthroplasty) procedures, and divided by age under/over 50 years. Linear regression modeling was performed to evaluate trends/differences in procedural volume by year.

RESULTS

The number of operative procedures to treat ONFH has relatively declined from 2010 to 2020. The relative proportion of joint-preserving procedures increased (8.6% to 11.2%) during this time period. There were significantly more joint-preserving procedures in patients aged <50 years relative to >50 years (15.3% versus 2.7%, P < .001). Overall, THA was the most common procedure (57,033;88.1%) relative to hemiarthroplasty (3,875;6.0%), core decompression (2,730;4.2%), bone graft (467;0.7%), and osteotomy (257;0.4%).

CONCLUSION

Surgical management of patients who have ONFH remains predominantly arthroplasty procedures (94% overall). Our findings suggest an increase in joint-preserving procedures, particularly core decompression, in patients <50 years (15.3%). Our findings provide insight into surgical management trends for ONFH, and suggest opportunities for joint-preserving procedures.

Is the Number of National Database Research Studies in Musculoskeletal Sarcoma Increasing, and Are These Studies Reliable?

BACKGROUND

Large national databases have become a common source of information on patterns of cancer care in the United States, particularly for low-incidence diseases such as sarcoma. Although aggregating information from many hospitals can achieve statistical power, this may come at a cost when complex variables must be abstracted from the medical record. There is a current lack of understanding of the frequency of use of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) over the last two decades in musculoskeletal sarcoma research and whether their use tends to produce papers with conflicting findings.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is the number of published studies using the SEER and NCDB databases in musculoskeletal sarcoma research increasing over time? (2) What are the author, journal, and content characteristics of these studies? (3) Do studies using the SEER and the NCDB databases for similar diagnoses and study questions report concordant or discordant key findings? (4) Are the administrative data reported by our institution to the SEER and the NCDB databases concordant with the data in our longitudinally maintained, physician-run orthopaedic oncology dataset?

METHODS

To answer our first three questions, PubMed was searched from 2001 through 2020 for all studies using the SEER or the NCDB databases to evaluate sarcoma. Studies were excluded from the review if they did not use these databases or studied anatomic locations other than the extremities, nonretroperitoneal pelvis, trunk, chest wall, or spine. To answer our first question, the number of SEER and NCDB studies were counted by year. The publication rate over the 20-year span was assessed with simple linear regression modeling. The difference in the mean number of studies between 5-year intervals (2001-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, 2016-2020) was also assessed with Student t-tests. To answer our second question, we recorded and summarized descriptive data regarding author, journal, and content for these studies. To answer our third question, we grouped all studies by diagnosis, and then identified studies that shared the same diagnosis and a similar major study question with at least one other study. We then categorized study questions (and their associated studies) as having concordant findings, discordant findings, or mixed findings. Proportions of studies with concordant, discordant, or mixed findings were compared. To answer our fourth question, a coding audit was performed assessing the concordance of nationally reported administrative data from our institution with data from our longitudinally maintained, physician-run orthopaedic oncology dataset in a series of patients during the past 3 years. Our orthopaedic oncology dataset is maintained on a weekly basis by the senior author who manually records data directly from the medical record and sarcoma tumor board consensus notes; this dataset served as the gold standard for data comparison. We compared date of birth, surgery date, margin status, tumor size, clinical stage, and adjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

The number of musculoskeletal sarcoma studies using the SEER and the NCDB databases has steadily increased over time in a linear regression model (β = 2.51; p < 0.001). The mean number of studies per year more than tripled during 2016-2020 compared with 2011-2015 (39 versus 13 studies; mean difference 26 ± 11; p = 0.03). Of the 299 studies in total, 56% (168 of 299) have been published since 2018. Nineteen institutions published more than five studies, and the most studies from one institution was 13. Orthopaedic surgeons authored 35% (104 of 299) of studies, and medical oncology journals published 44% (130 of 299). Of the 94 studies (31% of total [94 of 299]) that shared a major study question with at least one other study, 35% (33 of 94) reported discordant key findings, 29% (27 of 94) reported mixed key findings, and 44% (41 of 94) reported concordant key findings. Both concordant and discordant groups included papers on prognostic factors, demographic factors, and treatment strategies. When we compared nationally reported administrative data from our institution with our orthopaedic oncology dataset, we found clinically important discrepancies in adjuvant treatment (19% [15 of 77]), tumor size (21% [16 of 77]), surgery date (23% [18 of 77]), surgical margins (38% [29 of 77]), and clinical stage (77% [59 of 77]).

CONCLUSION

Appropriate use of databases in musculoskeletal cancer research is essential to promote clear interpretation of findings, as almost two-thirds of studies we evaluated that asked similar study questions produced discordant or mixed key findings. Readers should be mindful of the differences in what each database seeks to convey because asking the same questions of different databases may result in different answers depending on what information each database captures. Likewise, differences in how studies determine which patients to include or exclude, how they handle missing data, and what they choose to emphasize may result in different messages getting drawn from large-database studies. Still, given the rarity and heterogeneity of sarcomas, these databases remain particularly useful in musculoskeletal cancer research for nationwide incidence estimations, risk factor/prognostic factor assessment, patient demographic and hospital-level variable assessment, patterns of care over time, and hypothesis generation for future prospective studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

How to Create an Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Database Project: A Step-by-Step Guide Part II: Study Execution

In recent years, the use of national databases in orthopaedic surgery research has grown substantially with database studies comprising an estimated ∼10% of all published lower extremity arthroplasty research. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to: (1) design; (2) execute; and (3) publish an orthopaedic database arthroplasty project. In part II, we discuss how to collect data, propose a novel checklist/standards for presenting orthopaedic database information (SOPOD), discuss methods for appropriate data interpretation/analysis, and summarize how to convert findings to a manuscript (providing a previously published example study). Data collection can be divided into two stages: baseline patient demographics and primary/secondary outcomes of interest. Our proposed SOPOD is more orthopaedic-centered and builds upon previous standards for observational studies from the EQUATOR network. There are a host of statistical methods available to analyze data to compare baseline demographics, primary/secondary outcomes, and reduce type 1 errors seen in large datasets. When drafting a manuscript, it is important to consider and discuss the limitations of database studies, including their retrospective nature, issues with coding/billing, differences in statistical versus clinical significance (or relevance), lack of surgery details (approach, laterality, and implants), and limited sampling or follow-up. We hope this paper will serve as a starting point for those interested in conducting lower extremity arthroplasty database studies.

How to Create an Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Administrative Database Project: A Step-by-Step Guide Part I: Study Design

BACKGROUND

Use of clinical and administrative databases in orthopaedic surgery research has grown substantially in recent years. It is estimated that approximately 10% of all published lower extremity arthroplasty research have been database studies. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to (1) design, (2) execute, and (3) publish an orthopaedic administrative database arthroplasty project.

METHODS

In part I, we discuss how to develop a research question and choose a database (when databases should/should not be used), detailing advantages/disadvantages of those most commonly used. To date, the most commonly published databases in orthopaedic research have been the National Inpatient Sample, Medicare, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and those provided by PearlDiver. General advantages of most database studies include accessibility, affordability compared to prospective research studies, ease of use, large sample sizes, and the ability to identify trends and aggregate outcomes of multiple health care systems/providers.

RESULTS

Disadvantages of most databases include their retrospective observational nature, limitations of procedural/billing coding, relatively short follow-up, limited ability to control for confounding variables, and lack of functional/patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Although this study is not all-encompassing, we hope it will serve as a starting point for those interested in conducting and critically reviewing lower extremity arthroplasty database studies.

How does sleep apnea impact outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a matched-control analysis

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that the prevalence of sleep apnea (SA) to be increasing within the United States. While studies have shown the association of SA and its association on complications following elective orthopedic procedures, well-powered studies investigating its impact in a traumatic setting are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SA patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures have higher rates of: (1) hospital lengths of stay (LOS); (2) readmissions; (3) complications; and (4) healthcare expenditures.

METHODS

The 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files was queried from 2005 to 2014 for patients who sustained femoral neck fractures and were treated with primary THA. The study group consisted of patients with concomitant diagnoses of SA, whereas patients without SA served as controls. Study group patients were matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio by age, sex, and various comorbid conditions. Demographics of the cohorts were compared using Pearson's chi-squared analyses, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds (OR) of the effects of SA on postoperative outcomes. A p value less than 0.006 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

The final query yielded 24,936 patients within the study (n = 4166) and control (n = 20,770) cohorts. SA patients had significantly longer in-hospital LOS (6 vs. 5 days, p < 0.0001) but similar readmission rates (24.12 vs. 20.50%; OR: 1.03, p = 0.476). SA patients had significantly higher frequency and odds of developing medical complications (72.66 vs. 43.85%; OR: 1.57, p < 0.0001), and higher healthcare costs ($22,743.79 vs. $21,572.89, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

SA is associated with longer in-hospital LOS, higher rates of complications and healthcare expenditures. This study is vital as it can allow orthopaedists to educate patients with SA on the potential complications which may occur following their procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

What are the Causes, Costs and Risk-Factors for Emergency Department Visits Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? An Analysis of 1,018,772 Patients

BACKGROUND

Well-powered studies analyzing the relationship and nature of emergency department (ED) visits following primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) are limited. The aim of this study was to: 1) compare baseline demographics of patients with/without an ED visit; 2) determine leading causes of ED visits; 3) identify patient-related risk factors; and 4) quantify 90-day episode-of-care healthcare costs divided by final diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary THA between January 1, 2010 and October 1, 2020 who presented to the ED within 90-days postoperatively were identified using the Mariner dataset of PearlDiver, yielding 1,018,772 patients. This included 3.9% (n = 39,439) patients who did and 96.1% (n = 979,333) who did not have an ED visit. Baseline demographics between the control/study cohorts, ED visit causes, risk-factors, and subsequent costs-of-care were analyzed. Using Bonferroni-correction, a P-value less than 0.002 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients who presented to the ED post-operatively were most often aged 65-74 years old (41.09%) or female sex (55.60%). Nonmusculoskeletal etiologies comprised 66.8% of all ED visits. Risk factors associated with increased ED visits included alcohol abuse, depressive disorders, congestive heart failure, coagulopathy, and electrolyte/fluid derangements (P < .001 for all). Pulmonary ($28,928.01) and cardiac ($28,574.69) visits attributed to the highest costs of care.

CONCLUSION

Nonmusculoskeletal causes constituted the majority of ED visits. The top five risk factors associated with increased odds of ED visits were alcohol abuse, electrolyte/fluid derangements, congestive heart failure, coagulopathy, and depression. This study highlights potential areas of pre-operative medical optimization that may reduce ED visits following primary THA.

High Prevalence of Causal Language and Inferences in Observational Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Database Studies: A Review of Papers Published Across Four Orthopaedic Journals

BACKGROUND

The use of administrative databases and clinical registries in lower extremity arthroplasty research is growing. Such observational studies are unable to fully control for confounders and cannot establish causality. However, many authors use causal language when describing their aims or findings, potentially misleading readers. We examined the prevalence of causal language and inferences in the lower extremity arthroplasty literature.

METHODS

We systematically identified administrative database and registry studies on hip and knee arthroplasty that were published in 4 orthopaedic journals in 2020. Articles were graded independently by two reviewers for the presence of causal language in both the title and abstract and the full text. Chi-squared analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between the causality grading and article characteristics including the journal of publication.

RESULTS

Of 116 eligible articles, we classified 79.3% of titles and abstracts as either consistently causal or inconsistently causal, with only 20.7% as consistently noncausal. A total of 40.5% of full texts were consistently causal, 49.1% were inconsistent, and 10.3% were consistently noncausal. Chi-squared analyses revealed no statistically significant association between the title and abstract's grading and the journal (P = .720) nor with the use of a database or registry (P = .716).

CONCLUSION

Causal language and inferences were present in 79.3% of titles and abstracts of lower extremity arthroplasty observational database studies published in 2020. The high prevalence of causal language and inferences in the arthroplasty literature may mislead readers.

The combined effect of policy changes and the covid-19 pandemic on the same day discharge and complications following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis

Introduction

As a result of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, elective surgeries, including total joint arthroplasty (TJA), were suspended nationwide. Concurrent removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Medicare inpatient-only list posed challenges to the delivery of quality patient care with low payor cost. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare temporal trends in patient demographics, case volumes, length of stay, and complications following elective THA in the years 2019 to 2020 in the United States.

Methods

The 2019 to 2020 ACS-NSQIP database was queried for elective THA patients. Patients Pre-COVID (2019 and 2020Q1) were compared with post-COVID (2020Q2-Q4). THA utilization, demographics, 30-day complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between years. Linear regression evaluated changes in case volumes over time with significance threshold of P < 0.05.

Results

A total of 77,797 patients underwent elective THA in 2019 (n = 43,667) and 2020 (n = 34,130), resulting in a 24.5% decline. Outpatient THA increased in 2020 (35.6%) vs. 2019 (5.7%) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the volume of cases in 2019Q1 through 2019Q4 (P = 0.984). Elective THA volumes declined by 68.8% in 2020Q2, returned to pre-pandemic baseline in 2020Q3, before leveling off at 81.5% of baseline in Q4. Average LOS was significantly shorter in 2020 (1.55 days) vs. 2019 (1.78 days) (P < 0.001) and the proportion of same day discharge (SDD) increased quarterly from 2019 to 2020. There was no significant difference in the total complication rates in 2019 (6.6%) vs. 2020 (6.6%) (P = 0.831).

Discussion

Elective THA precipitously declined during the second quarter of 2020. The combined effect of policy changes and the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a seven-fold increase in the number of surgeries performed in the outpatient setting in 2020. Rates of SDD doubled over the study period, despite no change in complication rates.

Optimizing Use of Large Databases in Joint Arthroplasty and Orthopaedics

The potential users of "big data" need to consider many factors when choosing whether to use a large observational database for their research question and, if so, which database is the best fit for the scientific question. The first section of this paper, written by Dr. James A. Browne, provides a framework (who, what, where, when, and why?) to assess the critical elements that are included in a large database, which allows the user to determine if interrogation of the data is likely to answer the research question. The next section of this paper, written by Dr. Bryan Springer, focuses on the importance of having an a priori research question before deciding the best data source to answer the question; it also elaborates on the differences between administrative databases and clinical databases. The final section of the paper, written by Dr. Kurt P. Spindler, reviews the concepts of hypothesis-generating and hypothesis-testing studies and discusses in detail the differences, strengths, limitations, and appropriate uses of observational data versus randomized controlled trials.

Analysis of New Orthopaedic Technologies in Large Database Research

Improvements in orthopaedic surgery go hand in hand with technological advances. The present article outlines the historical and current uses of large databases and registries for the evaluation of new orthopaedic technologies, providing insights for future utilization, with robotic-assisted surgery as the example technology.

Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Postpolio Syndrome: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with postpolio syndrome (PPS) may be afflicted by hip arthritis in either the paralytic or contralateral limb. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be considered in these patients. However, short-term and long-term outcomes following THA in PPS patients remain poorly characterized.

METHODS

The PearlDiver MHip administrative database was queried for patients undergoing THA. Patients with a diagnosis of PPS were matched 1:4 with control patients on the basis of age, gender, and comorbidity burden. Incidence of postoperative adverse events and readmission in the 90 days following surgery and occurrence of revision arthroplasty in the five-year postoperative period were assessed between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 1,519 PPS patients were matched to 6,076 control patients without PPS. After controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities, PPS patients demonstrated higher 90-day odds of urinary tract infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, P = .016), pneumonia (OR = 2.07, P < .001), prosthetic dislocation (OR = 1.63, P = .018), and readmission (OR = 1.49, P = .002). Five years following surgery, 94.7% of the PPS cohort remained revision-free, compared to 96.7% of the control cohort (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to patients without PPS, patients with PPS demonstrated a higher incidence of urinary tract infection, pneumonia, prosthetic dislocation, and hospital readmission. In addition, five-year incidence of revision arthroplasty was significantly higher among the PPS cohort. In light of these increased risks, special considerations should be made in both preoperative planning and postoperative surveillance of PPS patients undergoing THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Not all Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Are the Same: What Are the Implications in Large Database Studies?

BACKGROUND

The use of claims databases for research after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) has increased exponentially. These studies rely on accurate coding, and inadvertent inclusion of patients with nonroutine indications may influence results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complexity of THA and TKA captured by CPT code and determine if complication rates vary based on the indication.

METHODS

The NSQIP database was queried using CPT codes 21730 and 27447 to identify patients undergoing THA and TKA from 2018 to 2019. The surgical indication was classified based on the ICD-10 diagnosis code as routine primary, complex primary, inflammatory, fracture, oncologic, revision, infection, or indeterminant. Patient factors and 30-day complications, readmission, reoperation, and wound complications were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 86,009 THA patients had 703 ICD-10 diagnosis codes and 91.4% were routine primary indications. Complication rates were: routine primary 7.4%, complex primary 11.3%, inflammatory 12.5%, fracture 23.9%, oncologic 32.4%, revision 26.9%, infection 38.7%, and indeterminant 10.3% (P < .0001). 137,500 TKA patients had 552 ICD-10 diagnosis codes and 96.1% were routine primary cases. Complication rates were: routine primary 5.9%, complex primary 8.0%, inflammatory 7.2%, fracture 38.9%, oncologic 32.7%, revision 13.3%, infection 37.7%, and indeterminant 9.6% (P < .0001). Routine primary arthroplasty had significantly lower rates of reoperation, readmission, and wound complications.

CONCLUSION

Using CPT code alone captures 10% of THA and 4% of TKA patients with procedures for nonroutine primary indications. It is essential to recognize identification of patients simply by CPT code has the potential to inadvertently introduce bias, and surgeons should critically assess methods used to define the study populations.

Sleep Apnea and Postoperative Medical Complications and Health Care Expenditures Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Sleep Apnea (SA) is a common sleep disorder that increases postoperative morbidity. There is limited research on how SA influences outcomes following operative fixation of ankle fractures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether patients who undergo surgical fixation for bimalleolar ankle fractures have higher rates of medical complications and health care expenditures.

METHODS

A retrospective review from January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2014 was conducted using the parts A and B Medicare Data from PearlDiver database. Patients with and without SA on the day of the primary open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of their bimalleolar ankle fractures were queried using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Welch'st-tests were used to compare costs of care. A multivariate binomial logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of adverse events. A P-value <.001 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 20 560 patients (SA = 3150; comparison cohort = 17 410) who underwent ORIF for bimalleolar ankle fractures during the study period. Sleep apnea patients were found to have significantly higher rates and odds of 90-day medical complications (21.42% vs 7.47%, OR: 3.11, P < .0001) and 90-day costs of care ($7213.12 vs $5415.79, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

This research demonstrates an increased risk of postoperative medical complications and health care costs among patients with SA undergoing ORIF for bimalleolar ankle fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV: Retrospective.