Tunnel communication and increased graft signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Less tunnel enlargement in triple-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

No study thus far has compared tunnel enlargement between double-bundle and triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. We compared tibial tunnel enlargement and rate of tibial tunnel coalition between these two reconstructions, hypothesizing that tibial tunnel enlargement in triple-bundle reconstruction is less than that in double-bundle reconstruction, and that the tunnel coalition rate is equal between the two procedures.

METHODS

This prospective randomized clinical trial included 25 patients who underwent computed tomography 2 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Eleven patients underwent double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 14 underwent triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tunnel positions and tunnel coalition at the tibial tunnel aperture were assessed using three-dimensional computed tomography. Tunnel enlargement rate was calculated by measuring the sagittal and axial widths of the tibial bone tunnel 10 mm from the tibial tunnel aperture. These parameters were then compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The changes in tunnel positions and tunnel coalitions between groups were not significantly different. On both sagittal and axial views, the tunnel enlargement rates of the medial and lateral sections of the anteromedial bundle in the triple-bundle group were significantly smaller than those in the double-bundle group (sagittal view, p = 0.02 and < 0.01, respectively; axial view, p = 0.02 and ≤ 0.05, respectively). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of posterolateral tunnel enlargement.

CONCLUSION

Tunnel widening in the medial and lateral sections of the anteromedial bundle-associated tibial tunnel in triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was smaller than that of double-bundle reconstruction. The tunnel coalition rates between the two reconstructions were not significantly different.

The incidence of tibial tunnel coalition is higher than femoral tunnel coalition in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Intra-operative and postoperative coalition of tunnels may occur in double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the incidence and effect on clinical outcomes of tunnel coalition following primary DB ACLR using a hamstring autograft has yet be analyzed, and thus remains unknown. The objective of this systematic review was to identify the incidence of tunnel coalition upon DB ACLR using hamstring autografts and to elucidate any clinical outcomes and/or complications that tunnel coalition may have postoperatively.

HYPOTHESIS

The incidence of tunnel coalition would increase in respect to time from the index surgery, and that tunnel coalition would be related to poorer clinical outcomes compared to non-coalition cases.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) were searched in accordance with PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines on June 15, 2020. Relevant studies were screened in duplicate and data regarding patient demographics, incidence of femoral and tibial tunnel coalition, and outcomes were extracted. Coalition rate was also compared between follow up at 1 month or less defined as "shorter-term", and 6 months or greater as "longer-term". Coalition is defined as the missing of a bony bridge between the two tunnels.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies examining 1,574 patients, mean age 29.1 years, were included in this study. 29 studies (1,110 knees) reported the incidence of femoral coalition with a pooled rate of coalition of 8% (95% CI=4-12%). 28 studies (1,129 knees) reported an incidence of tibial coalition with a pooled rate of coalition of 21% (95% CI=13-30%). The incidence of tibial coalition was significantly higher than the incidence of femoral coalition across 21 comparative studies (OR=3.37, 95% CI=1.41-8.09, p=0.0065). Only two studies (111 knees) compared tunnel coalition and non-coalition groups for clinical outcome and no significant differences were observed with regards to Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and knee laxity measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer.

DISCUSSION

The rate of tibial tunnel coalition in DB ACLR is higher than femoral tunnel coalition, particularly at longer-term follow-up. Despite the higher radiographic evidence of coalition, the clinical effects of such remain to be ascertained, and further comparative studies are required to facilitate this understanding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review.

Radiological maturation and clinical results of double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 5-year prospective case-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to make a prospective comparison of the radiological and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHOD

This prospective, case-controlled study included 65 patients, separated into 2 groups as 33 patients undergoing single bundle (SB), and 32 patients undergoing double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction. The patients were evaluated clinically using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Lysholm knee scores. Stability was evaluated with the KT-1000 Arthrometer Measurement, the Lachman and pivot shift tests. Magnetic resonance images (MRI) at 1 and 5 years postoperatively were evaluated by a musculoskeletal radiologist. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon and the clinical evaluations were made by an independent researcher.

RESULTS

Evaluation was made of a total of 53 patients (SB: 28, DB: 25). No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups regarding the postoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores. The pivot shift tests were negative in the DB group and positive in two patients of the SB group. The Lachman test was negative in all the patients. No significant difference was determined between the groups. No statistically significant difference was determined between the two groups in respect of the arthrometer measurements. In the SB group, revision surgery was performed in two patients due to graft failure. No graft failure findings were determined in the DB group, and no statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of graft failure. On the MRIs taken at 1 year postoperatively, the ACL was seen to be hyperintense in 16 patients in the DB group and 6 patients in the SB group (p = 0.004). On the 5-year MRIs, ACL hypointensity could not be seen in three patients of the SB group and two of the DB group, with no difference determined between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the 5-year follow-up period, no difference was determined between patients undergoing SB ACL reconstruction and those undergoing DB ACL reconstruction regarding clinical scores, knee stability, and MRI findings, but graft maturation occurs later the patients undergoing DB reconstruction.

Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft maturation is superior to double-bundle hamstring tendon autograft maturation following anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the second-look arthroscopic findings 1 year postoperatively and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BTB) or hamstring tendon autograft (HT). Secondary purpose included clinical results from physical examination, including range of motion, Lachman test, pivot shift test, and knee anterior laxity evaluation, and the clinical score for subjective evaluations at 2 years after surgery.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, 75 patients with primary ACL injuries were divided into either the BTB group (n = 30) or HT group (n = 45). When using HT, an anatomical double-bundle ACLR was performed. BTB was indicated for athletes with sufficient motivation to return to sporting activity. Graft maturation on second-look arthroscopy was scored in terms of synovial coverage and revascularization. All participants underwent postoperative MRI evaluation 2 years postoperatively. The signal intensity (SI) characteristics of the reconstructed graft were evaluated using oblique axial proton density-weighted MR imaging (PDWI) perpendicular to the grafts. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) was calculated to quantitatively determine the normalized SI. For clinical evaluation, the Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT-2000 evaluation, Lysholm score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were used.

RESULTS

Arthroscopic findings showed that the graft maturation score in the BTB group (3.6 ± 0.7) was significantly greater than that in the anteromedial bundle (AMB; 2.9 ± 0.2, p = 0.02) and posterolateral bundle (PLB; 2.0 ± 0.9, p = 0.001) in the HT group. The mean MRI-SNQs were as follows: BTB, 2.3 ± 0.5; AMB, 2.9 ± 0.9; and PLB, 4.1 ± 1.1. There were significant differences between BTB, AMB, and PLB (BTB and AMB: p = 0.04, BTB and PLB: p = 0.003, AMB and PLB: p = 0.03). Second-look arthroscopic maturation score and MRI-SNQ value significantly correlated for BTB, AMB, and PLB. No significant differences were detected in clinical scores. There was a significant difference (p = 0.02) in the knee laxity evaluation (BTB: 0.9 ± 1.1 mm; HT: 2.0 ± 1.9 mm).

CONCLUSION

BTB maturation is superior to that of double-bundle HT based on morphological and MRI evaluations following anatomical ACLR, although no significant differences were found in clinical scores. Regarding clinical relevance, the advantages of BTB may help clinicians decide on using the autograft option for athletes with higher motivation to return to sporting activity because significant differences were observed in morphological evaluation, MRI assessment, and knee anterior laxity evaluation between BTB and double-bundle HT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Correlation between the elastic modulus of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often acquires no signal in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) due to the short apparent transverse relaxation time of ACL. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI is capable of imaging ACL with high signal which enables quantitative ACL assessment. This study aimed to investigate the correlations of the mechanical and microstructural properties of human ACL specimens with quantitative three-dimensional UTE Cones (3D-UTE-Cones) MRI measures. ACL specimens were harvested from cadaveric knee joints of 13 (50.9 ± 21.1 years old, 11 males and 2 female) donors. Specimens were scanned using a series of quantitative 3D-UTE-Cones T₂ * (UTE-T₂ *), T₁ (UTE-T₁ ), Adiabatic T_1ρ (UTE-Adiab-T_1ρ ), and magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) sequences in a wrist coil on a clinical 3T scanner. ACL elastic modulus was measured using a uniaxial tensile mechanical test. Histomorphometry analysis was performed to measure the average fascicle specific surface, fascicle size, and number of cells per unit area. Spearman's rank correlations of UTE-MRI biomarkers with mechanical and histomorphometry measures were investigated. The elastic modulus of ACL showed significant moderate correlations with UTE-Adiab-T_1ρ (R = -0.59, p = 0.01), macromolecular fraction from MT modeling (R = 0.54, p = 0.01), magnetization transfer ratio (R = 0.53, p = 0.01), UTE-T2* (R = -0.53, p = 0.01), and average fascicle specific surface (R = 0.54, p = 0.01). UTE-MRI showed nonsignificant correlations with histomorphometry measures. UTE-MRI biomarkers may be useful noninvasive tools for the ACL mechanical assessment.

Influence of Age on Signal Intensity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparisons Among Different Age Groups

BACKGROUND

Thus far, the clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been observed to be comparable between young and older patients. In contrast, age-related changes in the structural and mechanical properties of tendons used for autografts have been described. However, age-related changes associated with graft maturation remain poorly understood.

HYPOTHESES

The hypotheses of this study were that (1) clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction would be comparable between younger and relatively older patients and (2) younger patients would show lower signal intensity changes on magnetic resonance imaging scans indicative of graft maturation that would be better than that in relatively older patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 236 patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction via the outside-in technique using hamstring autograft between January 2012 and December 2015. The patients were categorized by age into 3 groups: <20 years old, 20 to 39 years old, and ≥40 years old. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner activity scale, Lysholm score, and objective assessment of joint laxity 24 months after surgery. In addition, graft maturation was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging-derived measures of the signal intensity ratio (SIR) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes and graft maturation were compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

The SIR of both bundles increased from 3 months to 12 months and decreased by 24 months, showing the same tendency in all groups. No significant difference was found in the SIR among the 3 groups at any time point (P > .05). The IKDC score was significantly lower in the ≥40-year group than in the <20-year group (P < .01). In contrast, no significant differences were noted in other clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients aged ≥40 years exhibited lower IKDC scores compared with younger patients, although the results of graft maturation were comparable.

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction could not achieve sufficient control of pivot-shift when accompanying tibial tunnel coalition

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of tibial tunnel coalition on knee rotatory laxity and clinical outcomes after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who underwent anatomic DB ACL reconstruction were included prospectively. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the knee joint was obtained at approximately 1 year postoperatively to determine if tunnel coalition occurred. After excluding seven cases of femoral tunnel coalition, two groups were established based on the existence of a tibial tunnel coalition. The pivot-shift test was quantitatively evaluated on the basis of tibial acceleration preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Two subjective scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and Lysholm scores, were also collected. The pivot-shift measurement and subjective scores were compared between the ACL-reconstructed knees with and without tibial tunnel coalition. The independent t test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Student t tests were used in data analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one knees had tibial tunnel coalition (group C), whereas 13 knees did not have tunnel coalition(group N). Pivot-shift was significantly diminished postoperatively in both groups on the basis of the clinical examination and quantitative evaluations (p < 0.05). However, there was a small but significant difference in tibial acceleration demonstrating larger pivot-shift in group C (1.0 ± 0.6 m/s²) than in group N (0.5 ± 0.3 m/s², p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the IKDC subjective and Lysholm scores (both n.s.).

CONCLUSION

When the tibial tunnel coalition occurs after DB ACL reconstruction, knee rotatory laxity may not be restored in ACL-reconstructed knees, as expected in those without tunnel coalition. It is recommended that two tibial tunnels should be created separately when performing DB-ACL reconstruction to achieve better control of rotatory knee laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Clinical study of anatomical ACL reconstruction using a rounded rectangular dilator

Background

The aim of this study was that to compare clinical results between the rounded rectangular femoral tunnel ACL reconstruction (RFTR) and the conventional round femoral tunnel ACL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon. The hypothesis was that ACL reconstruction performed using the rounded rectangular dilator technique was better than that performed using the conventional round femoral tunnel technique in terms of clinical results and bone tunnel enlargement.

Methods

We conducted retrospective study. After exclusions, 40 patients were included in the conventional anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction (ASBR) group and 40 patients were included in the RFTR group. The evaluation items were knee stability, Lysholm knee score, IKDC subjective score at 2 years after surgery and bone tunnel enlargement.

Results

The RFTR group had a larger femoral tunnel area (average area, 53.1 ± 4.0 mm² vs. 46.1 ± 7.0 mm²; P < 0.01), better anteroposterior stability, and higher Lysholm scores than the ASBR group (average side-to-side difference for anterior tibial translation, 0.6 ± 0.8 mm vs. 1.6 ± 1.4 mm; P < 0.01; average Lysholm score, 98.5 ± 2.1 vs. 97.5 ± 3.5; P < 0.01). Further, bone tunnel enlargement ratio was significantly lower in the RFTR group (73 ± 38% vs. 107 ± 41%; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

We designed and developed an original rounded rectangular dilator to perform a novel ACL surgery. This technique can create a larger bone tunnel and improve clinical results than the conventional round anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Graft-Preserving Arthroscopic Debridement With Hardware Removal Is Effective for Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical, Arthrometric, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic debridement with graft preservation has been advocated as the treatment of choice for septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but no previous studies have investigated if hardware removal, while retaining the graft in situ, improves the success rate. Moreover, it is unclear whether the premature removal of fixation devices may affect graft integration and knee stability.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction who underwent arthroscopic debridement, while retaining the graft in situ but removing fixation devices, and to determine if premature hardware removal affects graft integrity and function. The hypothesis was that arthroscopic debridement with hardware removal would be effective in eradicating infections while not compromising graft integration and function.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

From a cohort of 2384 cases of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, 24 patients with postoperative septic arthritis were included for the analysis; 18 patients were available for a clinical evaluation using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, and Tegner score at a minimum 12-month follow-up. Knee laxity was assessed clinically with standardized manual laxity tests and instrumentally using an arthrometer and a triaxial accelerometer. Additionally, 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at final follow-up was performed, focusing on the graft signal, the cartilage status, and the occurrence of arthrofibrosis.

RESULTS

Eradication of the infection was achieved in all cases, and only 1 graft removal was performed because of insufficient tension. Among the remaining 23 patients, a single arthroscopic debridement procedure with hardware removal while preserving the graft was effective in 21 cases (91%) at a mean of 30 ± 37 days from ACL reconstruction to debridement. At last follow-up, 2 patients required a further ACL revision procedure. The mean IKDC, WOMAC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores of the patients available for the clinical evaluation were 75 ± 19, 90 ± 8, 79 ± 21, and 6 ± 2, respectively. No abnormal laxity was reported on manual testing, and arthrometric and accelerometer tests also demonstrated good knee stability (mean KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference was 1.6 ± 1.2 mm at manual maximum force). On MRI, a good graft signal was found in 50% of cases, while concomitant signs of arthrofibrosis were detected in 81% of patients. Severe cartilage defects (International Cartilage Repair Society grade ≥3) were reported in 63% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic debridement with hardware removal was effective in the eradication of infections after ACL reconstruction with extra-articular fixation while preserving graft integrity without compromising knee stability. Patients and surgeons should be aware of complications that might affect the outcome, particularly arthrofibrosis and chondrolysis.

Single-tunnel anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has the same effectiveness as double femoral, double tibial tunnel: A prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

To investigate whether single femoral, single tibial tunnel anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is equal to or superior to double femoral, double tibial tunnel ACL double-bundle anatomic reconstruction in terms of restoring the stability and functions of the knee joint.

METHODS

A prospective clinical study was performed to compare 30 cases of single-tunnel ACL double-bundle anatomic reconstruction to 28 cases of double-tunnel ACL double-bundle anatomic reconstruction, with average follow-up of 36 months. All graft tendons were hamstring tendon autografts. Tunnel placements in all the cases were made anatomically. Clinical results were collected after reconstruction. Graft appearance, meniscus status and cartilage state under arthroscopy were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Tunnel placements were in the anatomic positions in both groups. On the lateral pivot-shift test performed at 36 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between groups. Clinical results such as International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity scale, and range of motion showed no significant differences between the groups. The mean thickness of anteromedial graft was reduced by 10.3% and that of the posterolateral graft was reduced by 11.1% from the original graft thickness evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. No new meniscal tears were found either group; however, cartilage damage occurred in the double-tunnel group at 39.3%, and this rate was significantly higher than that in the single-tunnel group (10.0%).

CONCLUSION

Single femoral, single tibial tunnel anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction has the same effectiveness as the double femoral, double tibial tunnel in restoring the knee's stability and functions.

Inferior graft maturity in the PL bundle after autograft hamstring double-bundle ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) for graft maturation and the serial changes observed in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft at a minimum of 5 years after surgery.

METHODS

Forty-five patients who underwent DB ACL reconstruction between 2007 and 2010 were included in this prospective study. All participants underwent postoperative MRI at 3 weeks and 3, 6, 9 and 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 50 months. The signal intensity (SI) characteristics of the reconstructed graft were evaluated on oblique axial proton density-weighted MR imaging (PDWI) perpendicular to the grafts. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) was calculated to quantitatively determine the normalized SI. The SNQ of the AMB and PLB was evaluated separately.

RESULTS

The mean SNQ of the AM bundle (AMB) continued to increase until 6 months after surgery (5.2 ± 1.2), and then gradually decreased and became well stabilized by 18 months (3.3 ± 0.5), after which it remained unchanged. On the other hand, the mean SNQ of the PL bundle (PLB) continued to increase until 9 months after surgery (6.2 ± 1.1), and then decreased incrementally and became well stabilized by 24 months (4.1 ± 0.5). The SI of PLB was significantly higher than that of AMB between 3 and 24 months (p = 0.04, 0.03, 0.01, 0.04, 0.02 and 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that at least 18 months is needed after ACL reconstruction to sufficiently restore the SI of the AMB, while at least 24 months are needed to for the PLB. The SI of the PLB was significantly higher than that of the AMB at 3-24 months after surgery, indicating that the PLB showed inferior graft maturity to the AMB until 24 months after surgery. For clinical relevance, the correct understanding of serial changes in graft maturation may potentially be used in decision-making regarding a return to sports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective case series, Level IV.

Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome Between Bioabsorbable Interference Screws and Cortical Button-Post Fixation in Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Study With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years

PURPOSE

To investigate the tunnel enlargement rate and clinical function by comparing double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using different fixation devices.

METHODS

Patients receiving primary arthroscopic double-bundle ACLR were screened and divided into 2 groups on the basis of the method of graft fixation: bioabsorbable interference screw (BS) group and cortical button (CB) group. Bone tunnel size was assessed digitally using magnetic resonance imaging, which was performed a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Clinical evaluations were performed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and KT-1000 arthrometer 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixty patients receiving primary arthroscopic double-bundle ACLR were included. Overall, the BS group showed greater tunnel enlargement than the CB group, as well as a significantly increased rate of tunnel communication (P = .029). The average anteromedial tunnel enlargement rates for the BS and CB groups were 50% and 28%, respectively. The enlargement rate of the posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnel was similar in both groups. In the PL tibial tunnel, the CB group showed a significant increase in enlargement compared with the BS group (64% vs 45%, P = .0001). Both groups showed functional improvement in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and International Knee Documentation Committee score. No significant difference in postoperative functional outcomes was found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The BS group showed significantly greater tunnel enlargement in anteromedial tunnels and an increased tunnel communication rate compared with the CB group. On the other hand, the CB group showed greater tunnel enlargement in tibial PL tunnels. Tunnel communication was observed mostly on the tibial side in the BS patients. Equivalent clinical function outcomes were noted at 2 years after surgery in both groups of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Influence of knee flexion angle and transverse drill angle on creation of femoral tunnels in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transportal technique: Three-dimensional computed tomography simulation analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to find appropriate flexion angle and transverse drill angle for optimal femoral tunnels of anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle in double-bundle ACL reconstruction using transportal technique.

METHODS

Thirty three-dimensional knee models were reconstructed. Knee flexion angles were altered from 100° to 130° at intervals of 10°. Maximum transverse drill angle (MTA), MTA minus 10° and 20° were set up. Twelve different tunnels were determined by four flexion angles and three transverse drill angles for each bundle. Tunnel length, wall breakage, inter-tunnel communication and graft-bending angle were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean tunnel length of AM bundle was >30mm at 120° and 130° of flexion in all transverse drill angles. Mean tunnel length of PL bundle was >30mm during every condition. There were ≥1 cases of wall breakage except at 120° and 130° of flexion with MTA for AM bundle. There was no case of wall breakage for PL bundle. Considering inter-tunnel gap of >2mm without communication and obtuse graft-bending angle, 120° of flexion and MTA could be recommended as optimal condition for femoral tunnels of AM and PL bundles.

CONCLUSION

Flexion angle and transverse drill angle had combined effect on femoral tunnel in double-bundle ACL reconstruction using transportal technique. Achieving flexion angle of 120° and transverse drill angle close to the medial femoral condyle could be recommended as optimal condition for femoral tunnels of AM and PL bundles to avoid insufficient tunnel length, wall breakage, inter-tunnel communication and acute graft-bending angle.

Tunnel widening after single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized 8-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with regard to tunnel widening, isokinetic muscle strength, and clinical outcomes over an 8-year follow-up period.

METHODS

This study included 31 patients with ACL injury who underwent ACL reconstruction via the SB (n = 16) or the DB (n = 15) technique. Isokinetic and concentric strength measurements of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles were conducted at postoperative 6 months and postoperative 8 years, and 3D-CT scans of the knee joints were performed on the 2nd, 3rd and 6th month, and the 8th year postoperatively. Clinical evaluations were performed at 8 years postoperatively with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, and Lysholm knee scoring systems.

RESULTS

There was marked widening of the parts of the femoral tunnel close to the knee joint in both the SD and the DB groups. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of clinical results and isometric muscle strength at postoperative 8 years; however, there was a significant difference between the preoperative and 6 months postoperative clinical and strength results in both group (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the groups in IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and anterior drawer test at postoperative 8 years. On evaluation of the anteromedial bundles alone, the DB group had greater widening than the SB group.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we have found that the tunnels continue to enlarge after 6 months. However, that has no impact in patients comfort and that did not made any change in our daily routine. On the other hand, we found that the reconstruction of the double-band ligament technique is useless for non-professional athletes.

Is Remnant Preservation Truly Beneficial to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Healing? Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluations of Remnant-Preserved Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Remnant-preserved anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was introduced to improve clinical outcomes and biological healing. However, the effects of remnant preservation and the influence of the delay from injury until reconstruction on the outcomes of this technique are still uncertain. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purposes of this study were to evaluate whether remnant preservation improved the clinical outcomes and graft incorporation of ACL reconstruction and to examine the influence of the delay between ACL injury and reconstruction on the usefulness of remnant preservation. We hypothesized that remnant preservation improves clinical results and accelerates graft incorporation and that its effect is dependent on the delay between ACL injury and reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 151 consecutive patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a semitendinosus graft were enrolled in this study: 74 knees underwent ACL reconstruction without a remnant (or the remnant was <25% of the intra-articular portion of the graft; NR group), while 77 knees underwent ACL reconstruction with remnant preservation (RP group). These were divided into 4 subgroups based on the time from injury to surgery: phase 1 was <3 weeks (n = 24), phase 2 was 3 to less than 8 weeks (n = 70), phase 3 was 8 to 20 weeks (n = 32), and phase 4 was >20 weeks (n = 25). Clinical measurements, including KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side anterior tibial translation measurements, were assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after reconstruction. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluations of graft maturation and graft-tunnel integration of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after reconstruction.

RESULTS

There was no difference in side-to-side anterior tibial translation between the NR and RP groups. There was also no difference in graft maturation between the 2 groups. Furthermore, the time from ACL injury until reconstruction did not affect graft maturation, except in the case of very long delays before reconstruction (phase 4). Graft-tunnel integration was significantly increased in both groups in a time-dependent manner. However, there was no difference between the NR and RP groups.

CONCLUSION

Remnant preservation did not improve knee stability at 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, remnant preservation did not accelerate graft incorporation, especially during the acute and subacute injury phases.

Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Diameter and Bioabsorbable Screw Findings After Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction in 5-Year Clinical and MRI Follow-up

Background:

Tunnel enlargement is frequently seen in short-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). According to new evidence, tunnel enlargement may be followed by tunnel narrowing, but the long-term evolution of the tunnels is currently unknown.

Hypothesis/Purpose:

The hypothesis was that tunnel enlargement is followed by tunnel narrowing caused by ossification as seen in follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ossification pattern of the tunnels, the communication of the 2 femoral and 2 tibial tunnels, and screw absorption findings in MRI.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Thirty-one patients underwent anatomic double-bundle ACLR with hamstring grafts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation and were followed with MRI and clinical evaluation at 2 and 5 years postoperatively.

Results:

The mean tunnel enlargement at 2 years was 58% and reduced to 46% at 5 years. Tunnel ossification resulted in evenly narrowed tunnels in 44%, in conical tunnels in 48%, and fully ossified tunnels in 8%. Tunnel communication increased from 13% to 23% in the femur and from 19% to 23% in the tibia between 2 and 5 years and was not associated with knee laxity. At 5 years, 54% of the screws were not visible, with 35% of the screws replaced by a cyst and 19% fully ossified. Tunnel cysts were not associated with worse patient-reported outcomes or knee laxity. Patients with a tibial anteromedial tunnel cyst had higher Lysholm scores than patients without a cyst (93 and 84, P = .03).

Conclusion:

Tunnel enlargement was followed by tunnel narrowing in 5-year follow-up after double-bundle ACLR. Tunnel communication and tunnel cysts were frequent MRI findings and not associated with adverse clinical evaluation results.

Graft quality and clinical outcomes of intraoperative bone tunnel communication in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background/objective

In anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, it is crucial to create two separate bone tunnels within the footprints of the anterior cruciate ligament at the femur and tibia. This can occasionally be difficult to accomplish and the adverse effects of bone tunnel communication are unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of intraoperative bone tunnel communication on graft quality and clinical outcome.

Methods

Fifty-two patients (52 knees) who underwent anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons were included. The mean age of the patients was 30.7 years. Clinical assessments were performed 1 year after surgery. Bone tunnel communication was evaluated using computed tomography 10 days after surgery. Graft quality was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging 6 months after surgery and the signal/noise quotient was calculated using the region of interest technique.

Results

Bone tunnel communication was observed in the femur of one knee (1.9%) and the tibias of 10 knees (30.8%). The knees with tibial bone communication were classified into Group C (N = 16), and the knees without tibial bone tunnel communication were classified into Group N (N = 36). No significant differences were observed between Groups C and N in terms of clinical outcome. The signal/noise quotient of the distal portion of the posterolateral graft in Group C was significantly higher than that of Group N.

Conclusion

Bone tunnel communication in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction did not affect clinical outcome, but it did affect posterolateral graft quality.

Level of evidence

Level 4, case series, therapeutic studies.

High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature

BACKGROUND

ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed and studied procedures in modern sports medicine. A multitude of objective and subjective patient outcome measures exists; however, nonstandardized reporting patterns of these metrics may create challenges in objectively analyzing pooled results from different studies. The goal of this study was to document the variability in outcome reporting patterns in high-impact orthopaedic studies of ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

All clinical studies pertaining to ACL reconstruction in four high-impact-factor orthopaedic journals over a five-year period were reviewed. Biomechanical, basic science, and imaging studies were excluded, as were studies with fewer than fifty patients, yielding 119 studies for review. Incorporation of various objective and subjective outcomes was noted for each study.

RESULTS

Substantial variability in reporting of both objective and subjective measures was noted in the study cohort. Although a majority of studies reported instrumented laxity findings, there was substantial variability in the type and method of laxity reporting. Most other objective outcomes, including range of motion, strength, and complications, were reported in <50% of all studies. Return to pre-injury level of activity was infrequently reported (24% of studies), as were patient satisfaction and pain assessment following surgery (8% and 13%, respectively). Of the patient-reported outcomes, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scores were most often reported (71%, 63%, and 42%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variability in outcome reporting patterns exists among high-impact studies of ACL reconstruction. Such variability may create challenges in interpreting results and pooling them across different studies.

Evaluating the distance between the femoral tunnel centers in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a computer simulation

Purpose

We aimed to clarify the distance between the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle tunnel-aperture centers by simulating the anatomical femoral tunnel placement during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-D computer-aided design models of the knee, in order to discuss the risk of tunnel overlap. Relationships between the AM to PL center distance, body height, and sex difference were also analyzed.

Patients and methods

The positions of the AM and PL tunnel centers were defined based on previous studies using the quadrant method, and were superimposed anatomically onto the 3-D computer-aided design knee models from 68 intact femurs. The distance between the tunnel centers was measured using the 3-D DICOM software package. The correlation between the AM–PL distance and the subject’s body height was assessed, and a cutoff height value for a higher risk of overlap of the AM and PL tunnel apertures was identified.

Results

The distance between the AM and PL centers was 10.2±0.6 mm in males and 9.4±0.5 mm in females (P<0.01). The AM–PL center distance demonstrated good correlation with body height in both males (r=0.66, P<0.01) and females (r=0.63, P<0.01). When 9 mm was defined as the critical distance between the tunnel centers to preserve a 2 mm bony bridge between the two tunnels, the cutoff value was calculated to be a height of 160 cm in males and 155 cm in females.

Conclusion

When AM and PL tunnels were placed anatomically in simulated double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the distance between the two tunnel centers showed a strong positive correlation with body height. In cases with relatively short stature, the AM and PL tunnel apertures are considered to be at a higher risk of overlap when surgeons choose the double-bundle technique.