Fate of individuals with ischemic amputations in the REACH Registry: Three-year cardiovascular and limb-related outcomes

Inhibiting anti-angiogenic VEGF165b activates a miR-17-20a-Calcipressin-3 pathway that revascularizes ischemic muscle in peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

VEGF165a increases the expression of the microRNA-17-92 cluster, promoting developmental, retinal, and tumor angiogenesis. We have previously shown that VEGF165b, an alternatively spliced anti-angiogenic VEGF-A isoform, inhibits the VEGFR-STAT3 pathway in ischemic endothelial cells (ECs) to decrease their angiogenic capacity. In ischemic macrophages (Møs), VEGF165b inhibits VEGFR1 to induce S100A8/A9 expression, which drives M1-like polarization. Our current study aims to determine whether VEGF165b inhibition promotes perfusion recovery by regulating the microRNA(miR)-17-92 cluster in preclinical PAD.

METHODS

Femoral artery ligation and resection was used as a preclinical PAD model. Hypoxia serum starvation (HSS) was used as an in vitro PAD model. VEGF165b was inhibited/neutralized by an isoform-specific VEGF165b antibody.

RESULTS

Here, we show that VEGF165b-inhibition induces the expression of miR-17-20a (within miR-17-92 (miR-17-18a-19a-19b-20a-92) cluster) in HSS-ECs and HSS-Møs vs. respective normal and/or isotype-matched IgG controls to enhance perfusion recovery. Consistent with the bioinformatics analysis that revealed RCAN3 as a common target of miR-17 and miR-20a, Argonaute-2 pull-down assays showed decreased miR-17-20a expression and higher RCAN3 expression in the RNA-induced silencing complex of HSS-ECs and HSS-Møs vs. respective controls. Inhibiting miR-17-20a induced RCAN3 levels to decrease ischemic angiogenesis and promoted M1-like polarization to impair perfusion recovery. Finally, using STAT3 inhibitors, S100A8/A9 silencers, and VEGFR1-deficient ECs and Møs, we show that VEGF165b-inhibition activates the miR-17-20a-RCAN3 pathway independent of VEGFR1-STAT3 or VEGFR1-S100A8/A9 in ischemic-ECs and ischemic-Møs respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data revealed a hereunto unrecognized therapeutic 'miR-17-20a-RCAN3' pathway in the ischemic vasculature that is VEGFR1-STAT3/S100A8/A9 independent and is activated only upon VEGF165b-inhibition in PAD.

Amputation-free survival in the long-term follow-up and gender-related characteristics in patients revascularized for critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) present a high risk of cardiovascular events and death. Revascularization is the cornerstone of therapy to relieve ischemic pain and prevent limb loss. Literature data suggest that women tend to present with worse outcomes after revascularization. The aim of the present study is to determine amputation-free survival in a long-term follow-up in women and men following endovascular revascularization procedure for CLI.

METHODS

From November 2013 to December 2020, 357 consecutive patients were retrospectively included. Clinical and biological parameters were recorded at baseline before endovascular revascularization. During follow-up until February 2023, overall survival and amputation-free survival (freedom from major amputation) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to study the parameters associated with amputation-free survival. A P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 357 consecutive patients were included, 189 men and 168 women with CLI, with a mean age of 78.6±12 years. Treated hypertension (79%), diabetes mellitus (48%), coronary artery disease (39%) and protein malnutrition (61%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Women were older than men with a mean age of 82.4±11.4 years (versus 75.4±11 years in men) and presented more frequently with protein malnutrition (70% of women). Prevalence of diabetes, tobacco use and history of coronary heart disease were significantly higher in men. During the 10-year follow-up period, 241 patients had died (68%) and 38 (11%) underwent major amputation, of whom 22 patients were still alive on February 2023. Median survival was 35.5 months [IQR: 29.5; 43] in the overall population, 38.5 [32; 50.4] months in women and 33.5 months [24.7; 43.5] in men. No gender-related differences were noted according to peri-procedural complications, survival probability and amputation-free survival. In multivariate analysis for amputation-free survival, age, previous coronary heart disease, C-reactive protein level, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<60% and albumin level<35g/L were correlated with poor outcome. In particular, protein malnutrition, as a treatable risk factor, appears significantly correlated with poor outcome in both men and women (HR=2.50 [1.16;5.38], P=0.0196 in men; HR=1.77 [1.00;3.13], P=0.049 in women).

CONCLUSION

The present results highlight that mortality in patients after endovascular revascularization remains high with a mortality rate of 28% at 1 year, 40% at 2 years and 51% at 3 years. Women represented a distinct population, almost 10-year older than their male counterparts, with more prevalent protein malnutrition. However, no gender-related difference was noted according to amputation-free survival on the long-term follow-up. Associated risk factors are mainly age, a history of coronary heart disease, pre-procedural inflammatory syndrome and protein malnutrition. Correction of malnutrition could have the potential to improve functional and general long-term prognosis in patients with CLI together with optimal medical and interventional management.

Retrospective cohort study of long-term outcomes and prognostic factors for survival after lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetes

AIMS

Lower extremity amputation (LEA) is a pivotal event for patients with diabetes. This study aimed to provide updated data on the outcomes and prognostic factors after LEA for patients with diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all LEAs (n = 1081) performed at Tampere University Hospital between February 2007 and September 2020. Overall survival (OS) and major amputation-free survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Index amputation level was below ankle in 65 % (n = 704) of patients, below knee in 14 % (n = 154) of patients, and above knee in 21 % (n = 223) of patients. In the whole population, OS was 75.8 % (CI 95 %: 73.3-78.3) at one year and 38.3 % (CI 95 %: 34.7-41.7) at five years. Higher age, peripheral artery disease (PAD), more proximal amputation level, and lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduced OS. Multiple amputations and diagnosed dyslipidemia or hypertension associated with improved OS. Further, age, PAD, and GFR were identified as significant factors for major amputation free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

OS after LEA is poor. After major amputation, the risk for death is higher compared to minor amputation. Recurrent amputation is associated with improved OS. Further, ischemia and renal disease are significant factors for inferior OS.

Peri-procedural complications following endovascular revascularization for critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Revascularization procedures are considered the cornerstone of therapy in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and multiple procedures are often required to attain limb salvage. The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of peri-procedural complications after endovascular procedure, and to determine the clinical and biological characteristics of patients associated to the risk of peri-procedural complications.

METHODS

From November 2013 to May 2021, 324 consecutive patients were retrospectively included, of whom 99 underwent more than one revascularization procedure for contralateral CLI or clinical recurrence of CLI. A total of 532 revascularizations were performed. Clinical and biological parameters were recorded at baseline before endovascular revascularization. The occurrence of a peri-procedural complication (local complications, fatal and non-fatal major bleeding or cardiovascular events) was recorded up to 30days after revascularization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to study the parameters associated with per-procedural complications. A P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 324 consecutive patients were included, 177 men and 147 women with CLI, with a mean age of 77.6±11.9years. Most of these patients had cardiovascular comorbidities (41% with a history of coronary heart disease, 78% treated hypertensive patients, 49% diabetic patients). Peri-procedural mortality occurred in 13 patients (4%) and 9 patients (2.8%) experienced major amputation at one-month following revascularization. Among the 532 revascularization procedures, 99 major bleeding events (22.8% of the cohort population) and 31 cardiovascular events (8.6% of the cohort population), were recorded in the peri-procedural period. Cardiovascular events were associated with peri-procedural mortality. Complications at the puncture site occurred during 38 of the 532 procedures (10.2% of the cohort population). Compared with patients undergoing a single revascularization procedure, patients with multiple procedures presented a higher risk of major bleeding events (48.5% vs. 11.6%, P<0.0001) and access site complications (20.2% vs. 5.78%, P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, pulse pressure <60mmHg and hemoglobin level <10g/dl were correlated with the occurrence of major bleeding events; left ventricular ejection fraction<60% and the absence of statin treatment were correlated with the occurrence of cardiovascular complications; a high chronological rank of revascularization was correlated with the occurrence of local complication. Finally, age and gender were not associated with the occurrence of peri-procedural complication.

CONCLUSION

The present results highlight that multiple revascularization procedures for limb salvage are required in almost one third of the population with critical limb ischemia and were associated with the risk of major bleeding events and access site complications. The most frequent complications of peripheral vascular interventions were major bleeding events. Adverse cardiovascular events were related with peri-procedural mortality. Anemia, blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction and statin treatment are important parameters to consider for peri-procedural outcomes, independently of age, gender and the chronological rank of revascularization procedure.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

High-quality evidence from trials directly comparing single antiplatelet therapies in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) to dual antiplatelet therapies or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus low-dose rivaroxaban is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis on the effectiveness of all antithrombotic regimens studied in PAD.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleedings. Secondary endpoints were major adverse limb events (MALE) and acute limb ischaemia (ALI). For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was used to compare relative risks (RRs) between medication and ASA. ASA was the universal comparator since a majority of studies used ASA as in the reference group.

RESULTS

Twenty-four randomized controlled trials were identified including 48,759 patients. With regard to reducing MACE, clopidogrel [RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.93], ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97), ASA plus ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97), and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93) were more effective than ASA, and equally effective to one another. As compared to ASA, major bleedings occurred more frequently with vitamin K antagonists, rivaroxaban, ASA plus vitamin K antagonists, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban. All regimens were similar to ASA concerning MALE, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing ALI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80). Subgroup analysis in patients undergoing peripheral revascularization revealed that ≥ 3 months after intervention, evidence of benefit regarding clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and ASA plus ticagrelor was lacking, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing MACE (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97) and MALE (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97) compared to ASA. ASA plus clopidogrel was not superior to ASA in preventing MACE ≥ 3 months after revascularization. Evidence regarding antithrombotic treatment strategies within 3 months after a peripheral intervention was lacking.

CONCLUSION

Clopidogrel, ticagrelor, ASA plus ticagrelor, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban are superior to ASA monotherapy and equally effective to one another in preventing MACE in PAD. Of these four therapies, only ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban provides a higher risk of major bleedings. More than 3 months after peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban is superior in preventing MACE and MALE compared to ASA but again at the cost of a higher risk of bleeding, while other treatment regimens show non-superiority. Based on the current evidence, clopidogrel may be considered the antithrombotic therapy of choice for most PAD patients, while in patients who underwent a peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban could be considered for the long-term (> 3 months) prevention of MACE and MALE.

Incident cardiovascular events and early mortality in patients with revascularized critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVES

Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) present a high risk of cardiovascular events and death. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and one-year mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization procedure for CLI.

METHODS

This investigation is a retrospective analysis of an ongoing cohort study in patients with CLI undergoing endovascular revascularization, hospitalized in the vascular medicine department from November 2013 to December 2018. Major cardiovascular events were collected during the first year after revascularization procedure and were defined as heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke and sudden death. Mortality and major limb amputations, defined as above-the-ankle amputation, were determined during the one-year follow-up period. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with the occurrence of MACE and one-year mortality after revascularization procedure. A P≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study included 285 consecutive patients, 157 men (55%) and 128 women (45%), with a mean age of 77.8±12 years. Treated hypertension was present in 222 (78%) patients; diabetes was present in 137 (48%) patients; 112 (39%) patients had known coronary heart disease and 20 (7%) patients were dialysis dependent. During the one-year follow-up after revascularization procedure, 75 (26.3%) patients presented an incident cardiovascular event, of whom 19 (6.7%) patients in the perioperative period. Cumulative mortality rate was 26.7% (76 patients) mostly from cardiovascular causes. Twenty-five patients (8.8%) experienced major amputation. In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of MACE was associated with an increased mortality risk (HR 6.96 (2.99-16.94), P<0.001). Other variables associated with an increased mortality were living in a nursing home and malnutrition. Decompensated heart failure and coronary heart disease were both associated with incident MACE in multivariate analysis, independently of confounders.

CONCLUSION

In the present study population, incident MACE were prevalent in the year following endovascular revascularization procedure in patients with CLI and were associated with an increased risk of mortality. Coronary heart disease and decompensated heart failure are important contributors for the occurrence of MACE. In this elderly patient population with CLI, these results should be taken into account during the multidisciplinary team meeting before consideration of revascularization procedure.

[Key aspects of drug therapy in vascular surgery]

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is one of the most common manifestations of systemic atherosclerosis. PAD affects millions of people worldwide, thus greatly contributing to the structure of mortality and disability of the population of developed countries. Along with surgical revascularization, pharmacotherapy is becoming increasingly important in improving the prognosis in such patients. Modern clinical guidelines define optimal therapy for patients with PAD as simultaneous prescription of several classes of drugs (hypolipidemic, antithrombotic, antihypertensive and, probably, vasodilators), thus making it necessary for the surgeon to take into consideration possible drug interactions. This literature review presents the evolution of evidence-based approaches to drug therapy and an algorithm of choosing drugs, depending on initial risk for ischaemic events in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Effect of Endovascular Treatment on Systemic Vascular Resistance in Patients with Lower-Limb Peripheral Artery Disease

Objective: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for lower-limb peripheral artery disease patients reduces blood pressure (BP) and improves prognosis. This study retrospectively examined hemodynamics during EVT to clarify the mechanism. Materials and Methods: Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was measured using a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system during EVT. Furthermore, ankle brachial index was measured before and after EVT. Results: The study included 88 lesions of 56 patients (hypertension in 98%). SVR significantly decreased from 2409.1±746.8 dynes·s·cm^-5 to 2033.7±635.0 dynes·s·cm^-5 (p<0.0001). The difference in SVR before and after EVT was significantly greater in the Fontaine IV group than in the Fontaine IIa group (554.7±406.6 dynes·s·cm^-5 vs. 312.9±245.7 dynes·s·cm^-5, p=0.0151). The change in SVR was correlated with a change in mean BP in the upper limb (p=0.0026). When the change in pressure gradient between the upper limb and the diseased lower limb was large, mean BP of the upper limb significantly decreased (p=0.0022). Conclusion: EVT can reduce SVR and BP by canceling the pressure gradient between central BP and diseased lower-limb BP.

Study protocol for a prospective, longitudinal cohort study investigating the medical and psychosocial outcomes of UK combat casualties from the Afghanistan war: the ADVANCE Study

INTRODUCTION

The Afghanistan war (2003-2014) was a unique period in military medicine. Many service personnel survived injuries of a severity that would have been fatal at any other time in history; the long-term health outcomes of such injuries are unknown. The ArmeD SerVices TrAuma and RehabilitatioN OutComE (ADVANCE) study aims to determine the long-term effects on both medical and psychosocial health of servicemen surviving this severe combat related trauma.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

ADVANCE is a prospective cohort study. 1200 Afghanistan-deployed male UK military personnel and veterans will be recruited and will be studied at 0, 3, 6, 10, 15 and 20 years. Half are personnel who sustained combat trauma; a comparison group of the same size has been frequency matched based on deployment to Afghanistan, age, sex, service, rank and role. Participants undergo a series of physical health tests and questionnaires through which information is collected on cardiovascular disease (CVD), CVD risk factors, musculoskeletal disease, mental health, functional and social outcomes, quality of life, employment and mortality.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ADVANCE Study has approval from the Ministry of Defence Research Ethics Committee (protocol no:357/PPE/12) agreed 15 January 2013. Its results will be disseminated through manuscripts in clinical/academic journals and presentations at professional conferences, and through participant and stakeholder communications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The ADVANCE Study is registered at ISRCTN ID: ISRCTN57285353.

Predicting 10-year risk of recurrent cardiovascular events andcardiovascular interventions in patients with established cardiovascular disease: results from UCC-SMART and REACH

BACKGROUND

Existing cardiovascular risk scores for patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) estimate residual risk of recurrent major cardiovascular events (MACE). The aim of the current study is to develop and externally validate a prediction model to estimate the 10-year combined risk of recurrent MACE and cardiovascular interventions (MACE+) in patients with established CVD.

METHODS

Data of patients with established CVD from the UCC-SMART cohort (N = 8421) were used for model development, and patient data from REACH Western Europe (N = 14,528) and REACH North America (N = 19,495) for model validation. Predictors were selected based on the existing SMART risk score. A Fine and Gray competing risk-adjusted 10-year risk model was developed for the combined outcome MACE+. The model was validated in all patients and in strata of coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), peripheral artery disease (PAD).

RESULTS

External calibration for 2-year risk in REACH Western Europe and REACH North America was good, c-statistics were moderate: 0.60 and 0.58, respectively. In strata of CVD at baseline good external calibration was observed in patients with CHD and CeVD, however, poor calibration was seen in patients with PAD. C-statistics for patients with CHD were 0.60 and 0.57, for patients with CeVD 0.62 and 0.61, and for patients with PAD 0.53 and 0.54 in REACH Western Europe and REACH North America, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-year combined risk of recurrent MACE and cardiovascular interventions can be estimated in patients with established CHD or CeVD. However, cardiovascular interventions in patients with PAD could not be predicted reliably.

Lower Extremity Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia among Patients at the Extremes of Age

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) at the extremes of age are thought to have distinct risk factor profiles and poor outcomes after lower extremity revascularization (LER). The aim of this study is to examine the relationships among age, risk factor profiles, and outcomes of LER in patients with CLTI in a large database focusing on the extreme age groups.

METHODS

Patients undergoing LER for CLTI in the Vascular Quality Initiative suprainguinal bypass, infrainguinal bypass, and peripheral vascular intervention files were reviewed through 2019. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: premature peripheral artery disease (PAD) (≤50 years old), 51-84 years old, and elderly (≥85 years old). Trends in major amputation and mortality by age group were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 156,513 patients who underwent LER for CLTI. Of these, 9,063 (5.79%) patients had premature PAD, 131,694 (84.14%) patients were 51-84 years old, and 15,756 (10.07%) were elderly. Patients with premature PAD were more likely to have insulin-dependent diabetes, be dialysis-dependent, and be active smokers compared to patients 51-84 years old and the elderly. Elderly patients were more likely to undergo an endovascular procedure for tissue loss compared to younger groups. Perioperative and 1-year major amputation rates were highest among patients with premature PAD and decreased with increasing age (P < 0.001), while perioperative and 1-year mortality increased with age (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, premature PAD was associated with an increased risk of major amputation (odds ratio, OR = 1.41 [1.22-1.62]), while elderly age was associated with decreased odds of major amputation compared to patients 51-84 years old (OR = 0.61 [0.51-0.73]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at the extremes of age have significantly different outcomes after LER for CLTI. Although mortality increases with age, the risk of major amputation decreases. Patients with premature PAD constitute a group of patients with a high risk of perioperative and 1-year major amputation.

A meta-analysis of mortality after minor amputation among patients with diabetes and/or peripheral vascular disease

OBJECTIVE

Foot complications in patients with diabetes or peripheral artery disease (PAD) are serious events in the life of these patients that often lead to amputations and mortality. No evidence synthesis has been reported on the mortality rates after minor lower extremity amputation; thus, a quantitative evidence synthesis was needed.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies that had reported the survival or mortality rates after a minor LEA. The studies were required to include one or more of the following primary outcomes: mortality rate at 30 days, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, 6 to 7 years, or 8 to 9 years. The secondary outcomes were the mortality rates according to the anatomic location of the amputation in the foot and the independent risk factors for mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies with 17,325 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analytical results of the mortality rates were as follows: 3.5% at 1 month, 20% at 1 year, 28% at 3 years, 44.1% at 5 years, 51.3% at 6 to 7 years, and 58.5% at 8 to 9 years. From these studies of diabetic patients, age was the most consistent independent risk factor, followed by chronic kidney disease, PAD, and coronary artery disease. One study of patients with PAD had reported diabetes as an independent risk factor for mortality. The subgroup analysis of the four studies reporting the outcomes of patients with PAD showed greater 3- and 5-year mortality rates compared with the overall and "diabetic" results.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality after minor amputation for patients with diabetes and/or PAD was found to be very high. Compared with the reported cancer data, survival was worse than that for many cancers. Just as in the case of major amputations, minor amputations should be considered a pivotal event in the life of these patients.

Dapagliflozin and Cardiac, Kidney, and Limb Outcomes in Patients With and Without Peripheral Artery Disease in DECLARE-TIMI 58

BACKGROUND

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at heightened risk of cardiovascular complications. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin reduces the risk for hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and kidney events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. An increased risk of amputation has been observed with canagliflozin in 1 previous trial. We examined cardiovascular and kidney efficacy and the risk of limb-related events in patients with and without PAD in an exploratory analysis.

METHODS

A total of 17 160 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, including 1025 (6%) with PAD, were randomized. Key efficacy outcomes were MACE (cardiovascular [CV] death, myocardial infarction, stroke), CV death/HHF, and progression of kidney disease. Amputations, peripheral revascularization, and limb ischemic adverse events were site-reported and categorized by a blinded reviewer.

RESULTS

Patients in the placebo arm with PAD versus those without tended to have higher adjusted risk of CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.23 [95% CI, 0.97-1.56], P=0.094) and significantly higher adjusted risk of CV death/HHF (adjusted HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.21-2.12], P=0.0010) and progression of kidney disease (adjusted HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.13 - 2.03], P=0.0058), and limb adverse events (adjusted HR, 8.37, P<0.001). The relative risk reductions with dapagliflozin for CV death/HHF (HR, 0.86, PAD; HR, 0.82, no-PAD; P-interaction=0.79) and progression of kidney disease (HR, 0.78, PAD; HR, 0.76, no-PAD; P-interaction=0.84) were consistent regardless of PAD. There were 560 patients who had at least 1 limb ischemic event, 454 patients with at least 1 peripheral revascularization, and 236 patients with at least 1 amputation, with a total of 407 amputations reported. Overall, there were no significant differences in any limb outcome with dapagliflozin versus placebo including limb ischemic adverse events (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.90-1.26]) and amputation (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.84-1.40]), with no significant interactions by a history of PAD versus not (P-interactions=0.30 and 0.093, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with versus without PAD are at a higher risk of CV death of CV death, HHF, and kidney outcomes, and have a consistent benefits for CV death/HHF and progression of kidney disease with dapagliflozin. Patients with PAD had a higher risk of limb events, with no consistent pattern of incremental risk observed with dapagliflozin. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01730534.

Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Antithrombotic Therapy Following Revascularization Procedures in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and summarize the clinical efficacy and safety of available antithrombotic therapies after peripheral endovascular or surgical revascularization in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Five databases were searched using free-text and Emtree/Mesh terms for PAD, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and antithrombotic therapies of interest (ie, single antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, and vitamin K antagonists). Randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion if they assessed the risk of thrombotic events (ie, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, limb ischemia, or limb amputation) or safety profile (ie, minor, moderate, major, or fatal bleeding events) after revascularization. In total, 16 RCTs were identified. Only a few studies reported on treatment effects of the investigated therapies. Myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, and amputation were reported in up to 2.3%, 2.3%, 5.6%, and 7.3% of patients, respectively. Bleeding events were observed in up to 8.4% (major) and 1.5% (fatal) of patients. Despite available treatments, patients with PAD undergoing revascularization remain at risk of thrombotic events. There is a need for new treatments that will help to optimize care for patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing revascularization.

Incidence and Factors Associated With Major Amputation in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

Background:

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with increased risk of mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and major amputation. Data on major amputation from a large randomized trial that included a substantial cohort of patients without critical limb ischemia (CLI) have not been described. The objective was to describe the incidence and types of amputations in the EUCLID trial (Examining Use of Ticagrelor in Peripheral Artery Disease) population, subcategorize amputations in the CLI versus no CLI cohorts, and describe the events surrounding major amputation.

Methods and Results:

Postrandomization major amputation was analyzed in the EUCLID trial. Patients were stratified by baseline CLI status. The occurrence of major amputation was ascertained and defined as the highest level. Perioperative events surrounding major amputation were obtained including acute limb ischemia, revascularization, and all-cause mortality. All variables were assessed for significance in univariable and multivariable models. The rate of major amputation during the course of the trial was 1.6% overall, 8.4% in the CLI at baseline group, and 1.2% in the no CLI at baseline group. The annualized rate of major amputation was 0.6% in PAD overall, 3.9% in the CLI at baseline group, and 0.5% in the no CLI at baseline group. Several factors were associated with increased risk of major amputation, including history of amputation, the presence of diabetes mellitus, baseline Rutherford category 4 to 6, and an ankle-brachial index <0.8. Factors associated with a lower risk for major amputation included prior statin use. The 30-day mortality rate after major amputation was 6.5% overall, 5.6% in the CLI at baseline group, and 6.8% in the no CLI at baseline group. The annual mortality rate following major amputation was 22.8% in the CLI at baseline group and 16.0% in the no CLI at baseline group.

Conclusions:

The risk factors for major amputation in EUCLID patients are similar to previous large registries’ reports except for diabetes mellitus in patients with CLI. The mortality following major amputation is lower in the EUCLID trial compared with registry data.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01732822.

The burden of amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease in the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can lead to severe cases of critical limb ischemia (CLI), which in turn might lead to amputation. Amputation can have substantial consequences for patients. This publication aims to give a better understanding of the amputation-related burden in patients with PAD in the Netherlands.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review and grey literature searches were conducted followed by qualitative interviews with a multidisciplinary team of clinical experts in amputation. Subsequently, IQVIA's Dutch hospital claims data were analyzed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty-seven publications were identified. Dutch claims data identified claims for 2328 patients after amputation for PAD. Data for the following topics were found: incidence, mortality, complications, mobility, daily functioning, quality of life, utilities, length of stay (LoS), costs, and resource use. Annually, 90% of the 3300 amputations carried out in the Netherlands were due to vascular disease. One-year mortality in patients with an amputation ranged from 49.6% (above-the-knee amputation) to 9% (specialized care). Patients' quality of life was substantially affected and utility of post-major amputation for PAD was 0.54. LoS after amputation varied from 11.4 (general rehabilitation) to 53.4 days (amputation of the leg). Total budget incurred based on frequently claimed DBC's from Dutch claims data in patients with PAD undergoing an amputation over 2012 to 2016 was € 136,651,374. Mean cost per patient was € 17,821.

CONCLUSIONS

Amputation leads to substantial burden in patients with PAD in the Netherlands. Identified results give a better understanding of the specific Dutch burden of amputation.

Adherence to lipid management guidelines is associated with lower mortality and major adverse limb events in patients undergoing revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lipid management guidelines recommend high-intensity statins for all patients ≤75 years old with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and moderate-intensity statins for CLTI patients >75 years old without contraindications or on dialysis, but these recommendations are based primarily on coronary and stroke data. We aimed to validate these guidelines in patients with CLTI and to assess current adherence to these recommendations.

METHODS

We identified all patients with CLTI who underwent first-time revascularization (endovascular or surgical) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2005 to 2014. Patients were classified as taking high-intensity, moderate-intensity, low-intensity, or no statin postoperatively. Outcomes included death and major adverse limb event (MALE). Propensity scores were calculated for the probability of receiving guideline-recommended intensity of statin therapy to account for nonrandom assignment of treatments. Cox regression models were constructed and adjusted for the propensity scores and further adjusted for strong potential confounders.

RESULTS

After excluding patients on hemodialysis (n = 252), we identified 1019 limbs from 931 patients with a median follow-up of 380 days. Patients discharged on the recommended statin intensity had higher rates of preoperative statin use, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, stroke, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery bypass grafting; they had lower smoking rates and were less likely to be ambulatory preoperatively. Overall, only 35% were taking the recommended statin dosage: 55% of those >75 years old and 20% of those ≤75 years old. In multivariable analysis including propensity scores where appropriate, discharge on any statin was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90; P < .01). Discharge on the recommended intensity of statin therapy was associated with lower mortality (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99; P < .05) and lower MALE rate (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97; P < .05). Patients >75 years old and ≤75 years old accrued similar benefit. In patients >75 years old, moderate-intensity statin therapy was associated with lower rates of death and MALE compared with high-intensity therapy but did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the recommended intensity of statin therapy in compliance with 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lipid management guidelines is associated with significantly improved survival and lower MALE rate in patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI. Adherence to current guidelines is an appealing target for quality improvement.

Long-term outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia and heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

The impact of heart failure (HF) on long-term survival in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has not been well described. Outcomes stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are also unknown. A single center retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent treatment for CLI from 2006 to 2013. Baseline demographics, procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. HF diagnosis was based on appropriate signs and symptoms as well as results of non-invasive testing. Among 381 CLI patients, 120 (31%) had a history of HF and 261 (69%) had no history of heart failure (no-HF). Within the HF group, 74 (62%) had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 46 (38%) had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The average EF for those with no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF were 59±13% vs 56±9% vs 30±9%, respectively. The likelihood of having concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) was lowest in the no-HF group (43%), higher in the HFpEF group (70%) and highest in the HFrEF group (83%) ( p=0.001). Five-year survival was on average twofold higher in the no-HF group (43%) compared to both the HFpEF (19%, p=0.001) and HFrEF groups (24%, p=0.001). Long-term survival rates did not differ between the two HF groups ( p=0.50). There was no difference in 5-year freedom from major amputation or freedom from major adverse limb events between the no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF groups, respectively. Overall, the combination of CLI and HF is associated with poor 5-year survival, independent of the degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Geographic variation and risk factors for systemic and limb ischemic events in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease: Insights from the REACH Registry

Background

Patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk of ischemic events. However, data about predictors of this risk are limited.

Hypothesis

We analyzed baseline characteristics and 4‐year follow‐up of patients enrolled in the international REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry with symptomatic PAD and no history of stroke/transient ischemic attack to describe annual rates of recurrent ischemic events globally and geographically.

Methods

The primary outcome was systemic ischemic events (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) at 4 years. The secondary outcome was limb ischemic events (composite of lower limb amputation, peripheral bypass graft, and percutaneous intervention for PAD) at 2 years. Multivariate analysis identified risk factors associated with recurrent ischemic events.

Results

The primary endpoint rate reached 4.7% during the first year and increased continuously (by 4%–5% each year) to 17.6% by year 4, driven mainly by cardiovascular mortality (11.1% at year 4). Japan experienced lower adjusted ischemic rates (P < 0.01) vs North America. Renal impairment (P < 0.01), congestive heart failure (P < 0.01), history of diabetes (P < 0.01), history of myocardial infarction (P = 0.01), vascular disease (single or poly, P < 0.01), and older age (P < 0.01) were associated with increased risk of systemic ischemic events, whereas statin use was associated with lower risk (P = 0.03). The limb ischemic event rate was 5.7% at 2 years.

Conclusions

Four‐year systemic ischemic risk in patients with PAD and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attack remains high, and was mainly driven by cardiovascular mortality.

New developments in the clinical use of drug-coated balloon catheters in peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving the lower extremity is a major source of morbidity and mortality. Clinical manifestations of PAD span the spectrum from lifestyle limiting claudication to ulceration and gangrene leading to amputation. Advancements including balloon angioplasty, self-expanding stents, drug-eluting stents, and atherectomy have resulted in high technical success rates for endovascular therapy in patients with PAD. However, these advances have been limited by somewhat high rates of clinical restenosis and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The recent introduction of drug-coated balloon technology shows promise in limiting neointimal hyperplasia induced by vascular injury after endovascular therapies. This review summarizes the contemporary clinical data in the emerging area of drug-coated balloons.

Strategy of Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia Due to Infragenicular Lesions-Which Should Be Selected Firstly, Bypass Surgery or Endovascular Therapy?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In patients with peripheral arterial diseases (PADs) due to infra-popliteal (below the knee; BTK) lesions, we often encounter situations requiring the immediate selection of either of two revascularization methods, namely bypass surgery or endovascular therapy (EVT). However, the question of whether endovascular or surgical revascularization should be performed initially for critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients with BTK lesions has not been clarified. To assess the efficacy and durability of EVT or bypass as a first approach, we evaluated the short- and mid-term outcomes of the first revascularizations achieved using EVT (EVT First Group; EVT-first) compared with bypass (Bypass First Group; Bypass-first). To verify the validity of each initial revascularization, we explored factors influencing overall survival (OS) rates using multivariate analyses.

METHODS

A total of 169 consecutive BTK revascularization procedures (150 patients) for CLI conducted at our facility between November 2006 and July 2012 were analyzed. Patients undergoing revascularization were divided into two groups (EVT-first or Bypass-first), with 102 patients undergoing endovascular therapy first (EVT-first) and 51 undergoing bypass surgery first (Bypass-first). No statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups with respect to preoperative background including age, gender, and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, coronary arterial disease (CAD), chronic heart failure (CHF), cerebrovascular disease, and hemodialysis). Technical success was defined as a single straight-line flow to the ankle after completion angiography of the first revascularization method. Hemodynamic success was defined as a postoperative skin perfusion pressure of the foot exceeding 40 mmHg.

RESULTS

The average age of patients was 76.0 years (range, 46-98 years; 65 men and 37 women) and 72.3 years (range, 43-93 years; 35 men and 13 women) in the EVT-first and Bypass-first groups, respectively. Patient follow-up ranged from 1 to 50 months (mean, 15 months). Respective technical and hemodynamic success rates were 96.2% and 66.7% for EVT-first and 100% and 94% for Bypass-first, respectively. Treatment was required an average of 1.5 times for EVT-first and 1.2 times for Bypass-first. Respective rates for other factors examined in the EVT-first and the Bypass-first groups were: major amputation rates 30 days post-procedure, 5.9%, and 3.9%; mortality rates 30 days post-procedure, 3.9%, and 0%; one-year AFS rates, 71.7%, and 79.5%; OS rates, 73.5% and 83.9%; and limb salvage rates, 88.8%, and 91.0%. Multivariate-analysis of all subjects in the two groups revealed that the OS rates were affected by four risk factors as follows: (1) age greater than 80 years, (2) CAD, (3) CHF, and (4) a non-ambulatory limb.

CONCLUSION

For patients with CLI due to BTK lesions and whose saphenous veins are in poor condition or are in poor general condition having two or more of the four severe risk factors, the EVT-First procedure is effective and provides durable results. Overall survival in patients with CLI due to BTK lesions is worse when patients have more than two severe risk factors, which is non-ambulatory limb, aged less than 81 years, with CAD or with CHF. (This article is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2014; 23: 766-773.).

Pharmacological Treatment and Current Management of Peripheral Artery Disease

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at heightened risk of both systemic cardiovascular adverse events, as well as limb-related morbidity. The optimal management of patients with PAD requires a comprehensive treatment strategy incorporating both lifestyle changes, including smoking cessation and exercise, as well as optimal medical therapy. Pharmacological therapies for patients with PAD are targeted both at modifying broad risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events, as well as reducing limb-related morbidity. Observational data suggest that indicated pharmacological treatments are greatly underutilized in PAD, underscoring the need for improvements in patient identification and care delivery. Ongoing trials of novel therapies in patients with PAD will further inform pharmacological strategies to reduce both systemic cardiovascular risk and limb-related morbidity.

Peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischaemia: still poor outcomes and lack of guideline adherence

AIMS

Only few and historic studies reported a bad prognosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The contemporary state of treatment and outcomes should be assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From the largest public health insurance in Germany, all in- and outpatient diagnosis and procedural data were retrospectively obtained from a cohort of 41 882 patients hospitalized due to PAD during 2009-2011, including a follow-up until 2013. Patients were classified in Rutherford categories 1-3 (n = 21 197), 4 (n = 5353), 5 (n = 6916), and 6 (n = 8416). The proportions of patients with classical risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and smoking declined with higher Rutherford categories (each P < 0.001) while diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and chronic heart failure increased (each P < 0.001). Angiographies and revascularizations were performed less often in advanced PAD (each P < 0.001). In-hospital amputations increased continuously from 0.5% in Rutherford 1-3 to 42% in Rutherford 6, as also myocardial infarctions, strokes, and deaths (each P < 0.001). Among 4298 amputated patients with CLI, 37% had not received any angiography or revascularization neither during index hospitalization nor the 24 months before. During follow-up (mean 1144 days), 7825 patients were amputated and 10 880 died. Kaplan-Meier models projected 4-year mortality risks of 18.9, 37.7, 52.2, and 63.5% in Rutherford 1-3, 4, 5, and 6, and for amputation of 4.6, 12.1, 35.3, and 67.3%, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models, PAD categories were significant predictors of death, amputation, myocardial infarction, and stroke (each P < 0.001). Length of in-hospital stay (5.8 ± 6.7 days, 10.7 ± 11.1days, 15.2 ± 13.8 days and 22.1 ± 20.3 days; P < 0.001) and mean case costs (3662 ± 3186 €, 5316 ± 6139 €, 6021 ± 4892 €, and 8461 ± 8515 €; P < 0.001) increased continuously in Rutherford 1-3, 4, 5, and 6. While only 49% of the patients suffered from CLI, these produced 65% of in-hospital costs (141 million €), and 56% during follow-up (336 million €).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of recent advances in PAD treatment, current outcomes remain poor especially in CLI. Despite overwhelming evidence for reduction of limb loss by revascularization, CLI patients still received significantly less angiographies and revascularizations.

Vorapaxar in patients with peripheral artery disease and acute coronary syndrome: insights from Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRACER)

BACKGROUND

In the TRACER trial, vorapaxar, a protease-activated receptor-1 antagonist, plus standard care in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) patients did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point but reduced a key secondary end point and significantly increased bleeding. History of peripheral artery disease (PAD) was a risk-enrichment inclusion criterion. We investigated the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in NSTE ACS patients with documented PAD.

METHODS

TRACER was a double-blind, randomized trial comparing vorapaxar with placebo in 12,944 patients with NSTE ACS.

RESULTS

In total, 936 (7.2%) patients had a history of PAD. Ischemic events occurred more frequently among patients with PAD (25.3%) versus no PAD (12.2%, P < .001), and Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries moderate/severe bleeding was more common in PAD (9.1%) versus no PAD (5.0%, P = .004). Similar rates of the composite end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) occurred in patients with PAD treated with vorapaxar and placebo (21.7% vs 24.8%, P interaction = .787). Patients with PAD treated with vorapaxar, when compared with placebo, also had a numerical reduction in peripheral revascularization procedures (8.1% vs 9.0%, P = .158) and a lower extremity amputation rate (0.9% vs 1.5%, P = .107). Vorapaxar increased Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries moderate/severe bleeding similarly in patients with PAD (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% CI 0.89-2.45) and without (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.22-1.79; P interaction = .921).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NSTE ACS and PAD were at increased risk for ischemic events. Lower rates of ischemic end points, peripheral revascularization, and amputation with vorapaxar did not reach statistical significance but warrant further investigation. Vorapaxar increased bleeding in both patients with and without PAD at a similar magnitude of risk.

Statin therapy and long-term adverse limb outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease: insights from the REACH registry

AIMS

Due to a high burden of systemic cardiovascular events, current guidelines recommend the use of statins in all patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). We sought to study the impact of statin use on limb prognosis in patients with symptomatic PAD enrolled in the international REACH registry.

METHODS

Statin use was assessed at study enrolment, as well as a time-varying covariate. Rates of the primary adverse limb outcome (worsening claudication/new episode of critical limb ischaemia, new percutaneous/surgical revascularization, or amputation) at 4 years and the composite of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke were compared among statin users vs. non-users.

RESULTS

A total of 5861 patients with symptomatic PAD were included. Statin use at baseline was 62.2%. Patients who were on statins had a significantly lower risk of the primary adverse limb outcome at 4 years when compared with those who were not taking statins [22.0 vs. 26.2%; hazard ratio (HR), 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.92; P = 0.0013]. Results were similar when statin use was considered as a time-dependent variable (P = 0.018) and on propensity analysis (P < 0.0001). The composite of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke was similarly reduced (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with PAD in the REACH registry, statin use was associated with an ∼18% lower rate of adverse limb outcomes, including worsening symptoms, peripheral revascularization, and ischaemic amputations. These findings suggest that statin therapy not only reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, but also favourably affects limb prognosis in patients with PAD.

Alendronate and risk of lower limb ischemic vascular events: a population-based cohort study

While alendronate inhibits atherosclerosis experimentally, its effect on lower limb ischemia risk is unknown. Our results suggest that alendronate reduces the risk of lower limb ischemic vascular events requiring surgical interventions, including amputation. Our results are relevant for patients at risk of lower limb ischemia undergoing fragility fracture treatment.

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the association between alendronate therapy and the risk of lower limb ischemic vascular events (i.e., bypass surgery, endovascular stenting, and major lower limb amputation for lower limb ischemia).

METHODS

We used a nationwide population-based cohort of patients aged over 50 years diagnosed with a vertebral or hip fracture between January 1999 and June 2010. We compared the risk of lower limb ischemic vascular events between patients undergoing treatment with alendronate (n = 3,731) and an age- and sex-matched comparison group (n = 7,462) over 5 years of follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional regression analysis with adjustment for treatment status, comorbidities, and other variables.

RESULTS

Ten patients (0.3 %) in the alendronate treatment group had a lower limb ischemic vascular event compared with 51 patients (0.7 %) in the comparison group. The incidence of lower limb ischemic vascular events was 8.4 (95 % CI, 4.0-15.5) per 10,000 person-years in the alendronate group and 21.8 (95 % CI, 16.2-28.7) per 10,000 person-years in the comparison group. The risk of a lower limb ischemic vascular event in the alendronate treatment group was lower (adjusted HR, 0.41; 95 % CI, 0.21-0.82).

CONCLUSION

Alendronate treatment was associated with a reduced risk of lower limb ischemic vascular events among hip or vertebral fragility fracture patients.

High mortality risks after major lower extremity amputation in Medicare patients with peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the contemporary outcomes of older patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing major lower extremity (LE) amputation in the United States. We sought to characterize clinical outcomes and factors associated with outcomes after LE amputation in patients with PAD.

METHODS

Using data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2008, we examined the national patterns of mortality after major LE amputation among patients 65 years or older with PAD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the association between clinical variables, comorbid conditions, year of index amputation, geographic variation, and major LE amputation.

RESULTS

Among 186,338 older patients with identified PAD who underwent major LE amputation, the mortality rate was 13.5% at 30 days, 48.3% at 1 year, and 70.9% at 3 years. Age per 5-year increase (hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95% CI 1.29-1.29), history of heart failure (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.71-1.72), renal disease (HR 1.84. 95% CI 1.83-1.85), cancer (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.70-1.72), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.33, 95% CI, 1.32-1.33) were all independently associated with death after major LE amputation. Subjects who underwent above knee amputation had a statistically higher hazard of death when compared with subjects who underwent LE amputation at more distal locations (HR with above the knee amputation 1.31, 95% CI 1.25-1.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with PAD undergoing major LE amputation still face a slightly high mortality risk, with almost half of all patients with PAD dying within a year of major LE amputation.