Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: an aggressive disease potentially treatable with surgery

Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUNDS

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rarely high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung with features of both small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. In this study, we aim to construct a prognostic nomogram that integrates the clinical features and treatment options to predict disease-specific survival (DSS).

METHODS

A total of 713 patients diagnosed with LCNEC were from the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between 2010-2016. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to choose the significant predictors of DSS. External validation was performed using 77 patients with LCNEC in the West China Hospital Sichuan University between 2010-2018. The predictive accuracy and discriminative capability were estimated by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The clinical applicability of the nomogram was verified through the decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, we conducted a subgroup analysis of data available in the external cohort that may impact prognosis but was not recorded in the SEER database.

RESULTS

Six independent risk factors for DSS were identified and integrated into the nomogram. The nomogram achieved good C- indexes of 0.803 and 0.767 in the training and validation group, respectively. Moreover, the calibration curves for the probability of survival showed good agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation in 1-, 3- and 5-year DSS. The ROC curves demonstrated the prediction accuracy of the established nomogram (all Area Under Curve (AUC) > 0.8). DCA exhibited the favorable clinical applicability of the nomogram in the prediction of LCNEC survival. A risk classification system was built which could perfectly classify LCNEC patients into high-, medium- and low-risk groups (p < 0.001). The survival analysis conducted on the West China Hospital cohort indicated that whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), surgical procedures, tumor grade, Ki-67, and PD-L1 expression were not significantly associated with DSS.

CONCLUSION

This study has effectively developed a prognostic nomogram and a corresponding risk stratification system, which demonstrate promising potential for predicting the DSS of patients with LCNEC.

Survival outcomes of surgery in patients with pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a retrospective single-institution analysis and literature review

Background

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (pLCNEC) is a very rare malignancy originating from the lung and bronchus, and its biological behaviour, clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis are poorly understood. Thus, the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment-related prognostic factors of this rare disorder must be explored.

Results

The clinical data of 59 patients (48 males and 11 females) who were treated by surgery and diagnosed with pLCNEC by postoperative pathology at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from April 2004 to April 2019 were analysed retrospectively. The median patient age was 62 years (38–79 years), and the median duration of disease was 2 months (0.5–18 months). Compared with other lung malignancies, pLCNEC lacks specific clinical symptoms and imaging features, and preoperative biopsy pathology is often insufficient to confirm the diagnosis. The corresponding numbers of patients who were classified into stages I, II, III and IV according to the postoperative pathological tumour-nodal-metastasis stage were 25, 12, 15 and 7, respectively. The median overall survival was 36 months (0.9–61.1 months). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 76.3%, 49% and 44.7%, respectively. The tumour stage exerted a significant effect on survival (Cox multivariate analysis p < 0.05).

Conclusions

For patients with resectable pLCNEC, multidisciplinary therapy based on surgery may have good survival benefits, and tumour stage is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of pLCNEC.

Outcomes for Surgery in Large Cell Lung Neuroendocrine Cancer

INTRODUCTION

There are limited small, single-institution observational studies examining the role of surgery in large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC). We investigated the outcomes of surgery for stage I to IIIA LCNEC by using the National Cancer Database.

METHODS

Patients with stage I to IIIA LCNEC were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) and grouped by treatment: definitive chemoradiation versus surgery. Overall survival, by stage, was the primary outcome. Outcomes of surgical patients were also compared with those of patients with SCLC or other non-small cell histotypes.

RESULTS

A total of 6092 patients met the criteria: 96%, 94%, 75%, and 62% of patients received an operation for stage I, II, IIIA, and cN2 disease, respectively. Complete resection was achieved in at least 85% of patients. The 5-year survival rates for patients undergoing an operation for stage I and II LCNEC were 50% and 45%, respectively. Surgical patients with stage IIIA and N2 disease had 36% and 32% 5-year survival rates, respectively. When compared with stereotactic body radiation in stage I disease and chemoradiation in patients with stage II to IIIA disease, surgery was associated with a survival benefit. Patients with LCNEC who underwent an operation generally experienced worse survival by stage than did those with adenocarcinoma but experienced improved survival compared with patients with SCLC. Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with improved survival for pathologic stage II to IIIA disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is associated with reasonable outcomes for stage I to IIA LCNEC, although survival is generally worse than for adenocarcinoma. Surgery should be offered to medically fit patients with both early and locally advanced LCNEC, with guideline-concordant induction or adjuvant therapy.

Klotho expression and nodal involvement as predictive factors for large cell lung carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Klotho has been recently described as a carcinogenesis suppressor. Large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, highly malignant neoplasm. In the light of increasing incidence of neuroendocrine tumours, biomarkers predicting survival are needed. We consider that Klotho might be one.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analysed records of all patients diagnosed with LCNEC, atypical carcinoid and typical carcinoid operated on in our institution between 2007 and 2015. Initially, we found 134 cases. Forty-six specimens were unattainable and thus excluded from research. All patients diagnosed with LCNEC according to the WHO classification were included in the study. Immunohistochemical staining for Klotho was performed. We retrospectively reviewed patient charts and analysed multiple variables.

RESULTS

Positive staining for Klotho was present in 36 tissue specimens, while 12 patients were Klotho-negative. Survival length was significantly higher in Klotho-positive cases (p = 0.024), while advanced nodal status (N1 and N2) represented a marker of poor outcome (p = 0.011). In multivariate analysis, both Klotho presence (p = 0.015; HR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17-0.86) and nodal involvement (p = 0.007; HR = 3.04; 95% CI: 1.37-6.82) were independent prognostic factors. Tumour vessel invasion and visceral pleura infiltration were not associated with worse treatment results. Klotho presence predicted a favourable prognosis in these groups (p = 0.018; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that Klotho might be a positive factor for predicting survival in LCNEC and nodal involvement a negative one. Thus, these two markers may assist in the selection of subjects with unfavourable prognosis and to personalise therapy regimens.

Successful treatment with temozolomide in an elderly woman with advanced pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare type of lung cancer, and 40% of patients are in stage IV at initial diagnosis. It has an extremely poor prognosis with a 1-year survival rate of 27%. Patients with LCNEC are predominantly male, older, and heavy smokers. There has been no clinical trial conducted to determine the best treatment for advanced LCNEC. Temozolomide (TMZ) has been successfully used to treat a variety of malignancies, such as glioblastoma multiforme, astrocytoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma. However, its efficacy in advanced stage pulmonary LCNEC has rarely been studied.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present the rare case of a 69-year-old woman with advanced pulmonary LCNEC. She complained of recurrent dry cough for more than 1 month.

DIAGNOSES

After chest computed tomography (CT) and biopsies of supraclavicular lymph nodes, the diagnosis of stage IIIB LCNEC of the lung was made.

INTERVENTIONS

Four cycles of chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin was administered as the first-line regimen. As the disease progressed, we administered icotinib and liposomal paclitaxel. Finally, we administrated TMZ as the third-line regimen.

OUTCOMES

The patient showed partial response after 5 months. She has survived for 19 months from the time of diagnosis with a good performance status.

LESSONS

TMZ appears to be an efficacious option to treat elderly patients with advanced LCNEC.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases from pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a Japanese multi-institutional cooperative study (JLGK1401)

OBJECTIVE In 1999, the World Health Organization categorized large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung as a variant of large cell carcinoma, and LCNEC now accounts for 3% of all lung cancers. Although LCNEC is categorized among the non-small cell lung cancers, its biological behavior has recently been suggested to be very similar to that of a small cell pulmonary malignancy. The clinical outcome for patients with LCNEC is generally poor, and the optimal treatment for this malignancy has not yet been established. Little information is available regarding management of LCNEC patients with brain metastases (METs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for patients with brain METs from LCNEC. METHODS The Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife Society planned this retrospective study in which 21 Gamma Knife centers in Japan participated. Data from 101 patients were reviewed for this study. Most of the patients with LCNEC were men (80%), and the mean age was 67 years (range 39-84 years). Primary lung tumors were reported as well controlled in one-third of the patients. More than half of the patients had extracranial METs. Brain metastasis and lung cancer had been detected simultaneously in 25% of the patients. Before GKRS, brain METs had manifested with neurological symptoms in 37 patients. Additionally, prior to GKRS, resection was performed in 17 patients and radiation therapy in 10. A small cell lung carcinoma-based chemotherapy regimen was chosen for 48 patients. The median lesion number was 3 (range 1-33). The median cumulative tumor volume was 3.5 cm³, and the median radiation dose was 20.0 Gy. For statistical analysis, the standard Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine post-GKRS survival. Competing risk analysis was applied to estimate GKRS cumulative incidences of maintenance of neurological function and death, local recurrence, appearance of new lesions, and complications. RESULTS The overall median survival time (MST) was 9.6 months. MSTs for patients classified according to the modified recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) system were 25.7, 11.0, and 5.9 months for Class 1+2a (20 patients), Class 2b (28), and Class 3 (46), respectively. At 12 months after GKRS, neurological death-free and deterioration-free survival rates were 93% and 87%, respectively. Follow-up imaging studies were available in 78 patients. The tumor control rate was 86% at 12 months after GKRS. CONCLUSIONS The present study suggests that GKRS is an effective treatment for LCNEC patients with brain METs, particularly in terms of maintaining neurological status.

Correlation of neuroendocrine features with prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer

The improvement in histological diagnostic tools, including neuroendocrine markers by immunohistochemistry (IHC), has led to increased recognition of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with neuroendocrine (NE) feature. However, little is known regarding the prevalence and clinical implications of NE feature in patients with NSCLC. In this study, we performed IHC in a tissue microarray containing 451 Chinese NSCLC cases, and analyzed correlation of the expression of neuroendocrine marker with pathological and clinical features of NSCLC. The result showed that NE feature in NSCLC was detectable in almost 30% of studied patients, and tumors with NE feature were significantly correlated with pathological classification, clinical stages and cell differentiation of NSCLC. Our data also revealed that NE feature indicated worse overall survival and disease free survival. Compared with mutant p53, NE markers showed more significance as for prognostic evaluation. Multi-factor COX analysis further suggested a potential clinical impact for NE feature as an independent indicator of poor prognosis for NSCLC patients.

The role of surgery in high grade neuroendocrine tumours of the lung

High grade lung neuroendocrine tumours are a heterogeneous subtype of pulmonary cancers including small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). LCNEC represents approximately 2-3% of lung cancers, whereas SCLC represents 15-20% of lung cancers. Patients with SCLC and LCNEC have a poor prognosis compared with patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LCNEC is treated with primary surgical resection in stages I-II, which is similar to other NSCLCs. Neo-adjuvant treatment in stage III is similar to NSCLC but has not been well studied. LCNEC tumours have an unfavourable prognosis in higher stages but a more favourable prognosis in earlier stages. Surgery plays a minor role in treatment of SCLC because tumours are often locally advanced or have metastasized at the time of presentation and treatment relies on chemo- or chemoradiotherapy. However, patients with limited cancer may demonstrate better disease control upon surgical treatment. The resection rate of limited disease (LD) SCLC is low (1-6%), but 5-year survival rates of 31-42% after surgical resection are encouraging and are significantly higher than the survival rates of comparable patients that did not have surgery. Curing SCLC in stage I is reported in up to 66% of cases. Local treatment with either resection or radiotherapy alone is followed by high rates of locoregional and distant recurrences, so preoperative or adjuvant treatment is recommended. Here, we summarise the similarities and differences of SCLC and LCNEC and highlight the role of surgery in the treatment of SCLC and LCNEC and its effect on local recurrence prevention.

Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung

BACKGROUND

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung displays morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics common to neuroendocrine tumors and morphologic features of large-cell carcinomas. Because surgical resection of LCNEC in many series has been described with 5-year actuarial survival that is far worse than that reported for other histologic variants of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), considerable debate has emerged as to whether these tumors should be classified and treated as NSCLC or small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

The initial evaluation and diagnosis, tumor classification, surgical treatment, results of therapy, and long-term prognosis of patients with LCNEC based on our experience are discussed, and a review of the literature is presented.

RESULTS

Patients with LCNEC are more likely to develop recurrent lung cancer and have shorter actuarial survival than patients with other histologic types of NSCLC, even in those with stage I disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate differentiation of LCNEC from other types of NSCLC is important because it identifies those patients at highest risk for developing recurrent disease. Efforts to identify effective adjuvant therapies are needed to improve treatment outcomes with this aggressive type of lung cancer.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Clinico-Pathologic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) accounts for approximately 3% of lung cancers. Pathologic classification and optimal therapies are debated. We report the clinicopathologic features, treatment and survival of a series of patients with stage IV LCNEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases of pathologically-confirmed stage IV LCNEC evaluated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2006 to 2013 were identified. We collected demographic, treatment, and survival data. Available radiology was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with stage IV LCNEC were identified. The median age was 64 years, 63% of patients were male, and 88% were smokers. Twenty-three patients (n = 23/49; 47%) had brain metastases, 17 at diagnosis and 6 during the disease course. Seventeen LCNEC patients (35%) had molecular testing, of which 24% had KRAS mutations (n = 4/17). Treatment data for first-line metastatic disease was available on 37 patients: 70% (n = 26) received platinum/etoposide and 30% (n = 11) received other regimens. RECIST was completed on 23 patients with available imaging; objective response rate was 37% (95% confidence interval, 16%-62%) with platinum/etoposide, while those treated with other first-line regimens did not achieve a response. Median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval, 8.6-16.4 months) for the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage IV LCNEC have a high incidence of brain metastases. KRAS mutations are common. Patients with stage IV LCNEC do not respond as well to platinum/etoposide compared with historic data for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer; however, the prognosis is similar. Prospective studies are needed to define optimum therapy for stage IV LCNEC.

Predictors of survival after operation among patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) represents a rare entity in non-small cell lung cancer, with only partially understood biology and poor survival. A diagnosis is difficult to obtain on the basis of small biopsy specimens, but surgical procedures may be indicated in only a small fraction of patients. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and immunohistochemical features of patients with LCNEC to identify predictors of outcome and long-term survival.

METHODS

The clinical and pathologic data of 57 surgical patients with LCNEC between March 2003 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The tumor specimens were examined for expression of neuronal specific enolase, synaptophysin, CD 56, chromogranin-A, and the somatostatin receptor by immunohistochemistry. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant predictors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (41 men, 16 women) underwent thoracic operations with curative intent. Complete resection was achieved in 91% of cases. The results of staining for CD56, synaptophysin, neuronal specific enolase, chromogranin-A, and somatostatin were positive in 86%, 81%, 68%, 61%, and 21%, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 28 patients (49%). Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 50% and 45%, respectively, after 3 years. Advanced nodal status (N1, p < 0.025; N2, p < 0.02) and simultaneous expression of CD56 and chromogranin-A (p < 0.04) were significantly associated with poorer outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

LCNEC is a rare neuroendocrine pulmonary malignancy that is associated with poor prognosis and high recurrence rates. Surgical treatment can achieve satisfactory results in selected cases. Neuroendocrine marker profiles may predict prognosis and may influence the decision for adjuvant therapy or follow-up intervals.

A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics of large cell carcinoma of the lung

The aim of the present study was to analyze and summarize the clinicopathological characteristics of large-cell lung carcinoma (LCLC) of the lung, in order to improve the definite diagnosis rate of LCLC. Clinicopathological data of 174 patients with LCLC, confirmed pathologically, were retrospectively reviewed. The 174 cases of LCLC accounted for 5.7% of the total lung cancer cases during the corresponding time period at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University (Tianjin, China), among which there were 131 males and 43 females with an average age of 61.4 years. The postoperative pathological diagnosis of the 174 cases showed 80 cases of classic LCLC, 64 cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), six cases of combined LCNEC, 19 cases of basaloid carcinoma, three cases of clear cell carcinoma and two cases of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. Of the total 174 LCLC cases, 96 patients exhibited lymph node metastasis. LCLC is a highly aggressive malignancy with a high tendency of invasion and metastasis, although the incidence rate is low. A definite diagnosis of LCLC primarily relies on the pathological diagnosis. Each subtype of LCLC has its own pathomorphological and immunohistochemical characteristics.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma exhibiting extensive pagetoid spread in the bronchial epithelium: A case report

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor, which was proposed as a novel type of neuroendocrine tumor in 1991. Although it is categorized as a non-small cell lung carcinoma, the precise pathological condition is unknown due to its rare occurrence. The present study outlines the case of a patient presenting with an LCNEC that exhibited pagetoid spread from the region of the primary tumor to the bronchial epithelium (distance, >30 mm). The pagetoid spread was unconfirmed preoperatively, however, was identified by intraoperative rapid diagnosis. This caused us to suffer the perioperative decision of additional resection and resulted in an incomplete resection, as suture of the bronchus was not possible. Pagetoid spread, which is often apparent in the breast, presents as a rare pattern of infiltration of cancer cells when a massive carcinoma is identified beneath the intraepithelial spread. Although preoperative diagnosis of pagetoid spread is difficult due to its rarity and undefined clinical features, it is important for surgeons and pathologists treating lung cancer patients to be aware of potential pagetoid spread in the thoracic region.

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) without pulmonary symptoms diagnosed in a cutaneous metastasis

Patient: Female, 60

Final Diagnosis: Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Symptoms: Back pain

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Vertebroplasty

Specialty: Oncology

High grade neuroendocrine lung tumors: pathological characteristics, surgical management and prognostic implications

Among non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), large cell carcinoma (LCC) is credited of significant adverse prognosis. Its neuroendocrine subtype has even a poorer diagnosis, with long-term survival similar to small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Our purpose was to review the surgical characteristics of those tumors. The clinical records of patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer in two French centers from 1980 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. We more particularly focused on patients with LCC or with high grade neuroendocrine lung tumors. High grade neuroendocrine tumors were classified as pure large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (pure LCNEC), NSCLC combined with LCNEC (combined LCNEC), and SCLC combined with LCNEC (combined SCLC). There were 470 LCC and 155 high grade neuroendocrine lung tumors, with no difference concerning gender, mean age, smoking habits. There were significantly more exploratory thoracotomies in LCC, and more frequent postoperative complications in high grade neuroendocrine lung tumors. Pathologic TNM and 5-year survival rates were similar, with 5-year ranging from 34.3% to 37.6% for high grade neuroendocrine lung tumors and LCC, respectively. Induction and adjuvant therapy were not associated with an improved prognosis. The subgroups of LCNEC (pure NE, combined NE) and combined SCLC behaved similarly, except visceral pleura invasion, which proved more frequent in combined NE and less frequent in combined SCLC. Survival analysis showed a trend toward a lower 5-year survival in case of combined SCLC. Therefore, LCC, LCNEC and combined SCLC share the same poor prognosis, but surgical resection is associated with long-term survival in about one third of patients.

Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung: a critical analysis

Neuroendocrine carcinomas represent an important group of primary neoplasms in the lung. During the last decades, the nomenclature of these tumors has evolved and the current use of immunohistochemical and molecular biology studies have, to some extent, expanded the conventional view of these tumors. However, the primary diagnosis of most of these lesions is performed on limited biopsy specimens, which may not translate well when one is confronted with a nomenclature that is based on resected material. In addition, for some of these specific entities, some confusion and controversy apparently remain, allowing for the proliferations of different terms that, although they may be dismissed as "semantics," may have a role in interpretation, further subclassification, and, possibly, treatment. Herein we review current concepts regarding the classification of these neoplasms and the role of this classification in our daily practice and discuss how it may impact treatment.

[Trends in prognostic factors for neuroendocrine lung tumors]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze trends in a variety of prognostic factors for neuroendocrine lung carcinomas through analysis of 2 groups of surgically treated patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Group A contained the first 361 patients, treated between 1980 and 1997. That group was analyzed retrospectively and contained 261 patients with typical carcinoid tumors, 43 with atypical carcinoid tumors, 22 with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and 35 with small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Group B contained 404 patients enrolled prospectively between 1998 and 2002: 308 with typical carcinoid tumors, 49 with atypical carcinoid tumors, 18 with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and 29 with small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The following clinical variables were considered: sex, mean age, tumor site, tumor size, lymph node involvement, stage, metastasis, and local recurrence. The 1997 TNM classification was used for staging of lung cancer and survival analysis was performed along with assessment of factors influencing survival. Statistical analysis of the data involved univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

In both groups, significant differences were observed between patients with typical and atypical carcinoid tumors in terms of mean age, tumor size, node involvement, and recurrence. In group A, female sex, node involvement, and recurrence differed between patients with atypical carcinoid tumors and those with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; the same was true for group B, with the exception of lymph node involvement. Node involvement differed between patients with small-cell versus large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in group A but not group B. Both groups displayed significant differences in overall survival and survival of patients with lymph node involvement between patients with typical and atypical carcinoid tumors and between patients with atypical carcinoid tumors and those with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; no differences were observed between patients with large-cell versus small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Histological type and lymph node involvement had the greatest influence on prognosis in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A well-defined trend is observed in prognostic factors for neuroendocrine lung tumors. Histological type and lymph node involvement show the greatest influence on survival.

Sentinel node sampling limits lymphadenectomy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

It is controversial whether a systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) needs to be performed in all patients with stage I lung cancer. The present study was done to examine the new sentinel lymph nodes hypothesis based on the lobe of the primary tumor.

METHODS

In our first study, the lymph node (LN) metastases were assessed in 291 stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had a major lung resection with a systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection. We evaluated the validity of using our new sentinel lymph nodes method based on the lobe of the primary tumor as follows: the pretracheal (#3), tracheobronchial (#4), and hilar nodes (#10) for right upper lobe tumors; #4, subcarinal (#7), and #10 for middle lobe tumors; the subaortic (#5), paraaortic (#6), and #10 for left upper lobe tumors; and the #7, #10, and interlobar nodes (#11) for tumors in either lower lobes. In the second study, we performed a lobectomy with new sentinel node sampling in 64 patients with preoperative complications. If all of the sampling nodes showed no metastases on frozen section diagnosis, systematic node dissections were not performed.

RESULTS

Six of 291 patients in the first study had skip metastases that did not involve the new sentinel nodes; 5 of the 6 patients had macroscopic pleural invasion. Thus, we defined pleural invasion as an exclusion criterion for the second study. In the second study, the median follow-up time was 39 months. Metastatic lymph nodes were detected in 11 of 64 patients. Fifty-three patients (83%) had no metastasis in the sampled nodes, and, therefore, a mediastinal lymph node dissection was not done. The morbidity rate in the sampling group was 36%, and there was no mortality. In the sampling group, local recurrences were observed in two patients, distant metastases in eight, and carcinomatous pleuritis in one; the overall 5-year survival rate was 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that it is possible to perform a less invasive lymphadenectomy for patients with stage I lung cancer using intra-operative sampling of new sentinel lymph nodes.

Pulmonary and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Poorly differentiated large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) comprise a rare and still scarcely known subgroup of neuroendocrine tumors. The objective of this study was to investigate the epidemiology, clinical presentation, prognostic factors, and molecular pathways of patients with poorly differentiated LCNEC.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of poorly differentiated LCNEC according to the criteria of the most recent World Health Organization classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung entered the study. The clinicopathologic features of patients with poorly differentiated LCNEC were reviewed, prognostic parameters for their survival were studied, and the prognostic roles of the proteins involved in cell cycle regulation were investigated with tissue array analysis in a subset of patients with LCNEC.

RESULTS

Twenty-four men and 17 women with a median age of 63 years (age range, 26-81 years) who had LCNEC were studied. LCNEC developed after therapy for a first cancer in 14% of patients. Neither a personal or familial history of endocrine tumors nor a primary association that was compatible with an inherited syndrome was observed. The increase of at least 1 serum biologic marker was observed in 93% of patients. A primary tumor was identified in only 63% patients. Thirty-one patients had distant metastases, and 10 patients had only lymph node metastases at the time of the diagnosis. The 5-year survival rate was 24%. High mitotic count, low expression of neuroendocrine markers, and a Bcl-2/Bax ratio > 1 were unfavorable prognostic factors for survival (P < .01). All patients who had isolated peripheral lymph node LCNEC achieved a cure.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study highlighted distinctive clinical features and prognostic indicators of poorly differentiated LCNEC. Peripheral isolated lymph node clinical presentation is proposed as a new clinical entity.

Neuroendocrine differentiation and neuroendocrine morphology as two different patterns in large-cell bronchial carcinomas: outcome after complete resection

BACKGROUND

In 1999, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a new tumor entity in the group of non-small cell, epithelial tumors, a differentiated classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung not existing until this time. Scientific knowledge on prognosis and therapy of these tumors, especially between those with neuroendocrine morphology only and those showing additional expression of neuroendocrine markers, is fragmentary. In this analysis, we studied the clinical behavior and the prognosis of these two rare tumor entities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The analysis comprises 12 patients of a total of 2053, who underwent thoracotomy for non small-cell lung carcinoma between 1997 and 2005 in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the University Hospital of Freiburg. Clinical data, pathological examinations as well as complete follow-up were reviewed from large-cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine morphology only (n=4) and from large-cell carcinoma expressing neuroendocrine markers (n=8).

RESULTS

The median survival of patients with neuroendocrine morphology was 30 months (11-96 months). In the patient group showing the expression of neuroendocrine markers, the median survival time was 20 months (2-26 months). Tumor recurrences occurred in the group with neuroendocrine morphology, without exception, in the form of distant metastases and in the group with neuroendocrine markers as intrapulmonary metastases.

CONCLUSION

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung show aggressive behavior with a poor prognosis. Expression of neuroendocrine markers markedly reduce tumor-free interval as well as survival and might influence the site of metastases.

Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: An Aggressive Neuroendocrine Lung Cancer

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is part of the neuroendocrine spectrum of pulmonary tumors. This increasingly recognized tumor has been reported to have 5-year actuarial survival rates following resection that are worse than those described for other variants of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, debate has emerged regarding whether the tumors should be classified and treated as NSCLC or small-cell lung cancer. This article reviews the tumor characterization, biology, presentation and diagnosis, surgical therapy, results of therapy, and long term prognosis of patients with LCNEC.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung with a cystic appearance on computed tomography

Almost all reported cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are solid-type tumors. We encountered a rare case of LCNEC displaying a cystic shape. An abnormal cystic shadow was revealed on chest computed tomography in a 71-year-old man who underwent total gastrectomy due to gastric cancer 5 years earlier. The cystic lesion enlarged from 7 mm to 16 mm over 7 months, so surgery was performed for definitive diagnosis and therapy. Microscopy revealed rosette patterns, a high mitotic rate and a large area of necrosis. Neuroendocrine differentiation was confirmed on immunohistochemical examinations using chromogranin, synaptophysin and NCAM (CD56). Given these findings, LCNEC was diagnosed. This is the first report of LCNEC with a cystic shape. This case challenges preconceptions regarding the radiographic appearance of LCNEC.

Role of chemotherapy and the receptor tyrosine kinases KIT, PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, and Met in large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

PURPOSE

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a relatively uncommon, high-grade neuroendocrine tumor sharing several features with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) but currently considered as a variant of non-SCLC and accordingly treated with poor results. Little is known about the optimal therapy of LCNEC and the possible therapeutic molecular targets.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 83 patients with pure pulmonary LCNEC to investigate their clinicopathologic features, therapeutic strategy, and immunohistochemical expression and the mutational status of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) KIT, PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, and Met.

RESULTS

LCNEC histology predicted a dismal outcome (overall median survival, 17 months) even in stage I patients (5-year survival rate, 33%). LCNEC strongly expressed RTKs (KIT in 62.7% of patients, PDGFRalpha in 60.2%, PDGFRbeta in 81.9%, and Met in 47%), but no mutations were detected in the exons encoding for the relevant juxtamembrane domains. Tumor stage and size (> or = 3 cm) and Met expression were significantly correlated with survival. At univariate and multivariate analysis, SCLC-based chemotherapy (platinum-etoposide) was the most important variable correlating with survival, both in the adjuvant and metastatic settings (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary LCNEC represents an aggressive tumor requiring multimodal treatment even for resectable stage I disease, and LCNEC seems to respond to adjuvant platinum-etoposide-based chemotherapy. Patients who received this therapy had the best survival rate. Despite our failure in finding mutational events in the tested RTKs, the strong expression of KIT, PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, and Met in tumor cells suggests an important role of these RTKs in LCNEC, and these RTKs seem to be attractive therapeutic targets.

Tumeurs neuroendocrines thoraciques

Neuroendocrine pulmonary and thymic tumors constitute a distinct category of tumors collectively disclosing morphologic and biologic neuroendocrine features. They are classified in 4 histopathological types and 3 malignancy grades. The typical carcinoids are of low grade, the atypical carcinoids of intermediate grade and the large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with the small cell carcinoma are high grade neuroendocrine tumors. Their distinction relies on objective morphologic and phenotypic criteria of strong clinical significance and predictive prognostic value.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: An aggressive form of non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung display morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics common to neuroendocrine tumors and the morphologic features of large cell carcinomas. Surgical resection of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas in many series has been described, with 5-year actuarial survivals ranging from 13% to 57%. Considerable debate has emerged as to whether these tumors should be classified and treated as non-small cell lung cancers or small cell lung cancers. The objective of this study was to report the outcome of surgical resection in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas.

METHODS

An analysis of our tumor registry was performed to identify all patients undergoing surgical resection of lung cancer between July 1, 1988, and December 31, 2002, for large cell tumors. Cases were then segregated into large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (in which at least one portion of the tumor was a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma), or large cell carcinomas on the basis of morphology and differentiation. Follow-up was complete on all patients, with a mean follow-up of 48 months. Type of resection, mortality, and survival by stage were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival was determined for all patients from the date of surgical intervention. Cox proportional hazards model analysis incorporating the variables of age, sex, histology, and stage estimated the effect of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas on recurrence and death. The stage of disease in all patients was assessed according to the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 2099 patients who underwent resection, 82 (3.9%) had large cell lung cancers. Perioperative mortality was 2.4%. Overall survival and freedom from recurrence at 5 years for the entire group was 47.1% and 58.4%, respectively. Overall survival by histologic subtype at 5 years was 30.2% for patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (n = 45), 30.3% for patients with mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (n = 11), and 71.3% for patients with large cell carcinomas (n = 21). Survival was significantly worse for patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas than for patients with large cell carcinomas ( P = .013). The presence of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas in the specimen (the large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma groups combined) was significantly associated with decreased survival (relative risk, 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.29-4.58; P = .003) and decreased freedom from recurrence (relative risk, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.76-11.57; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas have a significantly worse survival after resection than patients with large cell carcinomas, even in stage I disease. Accurate differentiation of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma from large cell carcinoma is important because it identifies those patients at highest risk for the development of recurrent lung cancer.

Complexity in the treatment of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

PURPOSE

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), one of the neuroendocrine tumors of the lung, is considered as a variant of non-small cell lung carcinoma. The objective of this study was to investigate the treatment strategy for LCNEC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical information of 12 patients with LCNEC.

RESULTS

Three patients with stage I disease underwent curative resection but all relapsed within 20 months. One with stage IIA disease underwent non-curative resection received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin plus etoposide) and is well with no evidence of recurrence. Two with stage IIIB disease received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Both achieved partial response (PR) but relapsed within 2 months. One elderly patient with stage IIIA disease received vinorelbine alone and did not respond. Of five patients with stage IV disease, three received platinum-based chemotherapy but no patient achieved PR. Of five patients with gefitinib as salvage therapy, one achieved PR.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of LCNEC is poor. To improve the outcome, we must evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable disease. In addition, the evaluation of systemic and multimodality treatment strategies similar as in small cell lung cancer is worthy of consideration.