Long-Term Survival After Surgery Versus Percutaneous Intervention in Octogenarians With Multivessel Coronary Disease

Comparing outcomes between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with left main or multivessel disease

Mechanisms of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) differ as CABG provides surgical collateralization and may prolong life by preventing future myocardial infarctions (MI). However, CABG benefits are unclear in octogenarians, where surgical risk is often perceived as higher and PCI is chosen more liberally. We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes in octogenarians with left main or multivessel disease who underwent CABG or PCI. Primary outcome was late mortality (> 5 years). Secondary outcomes were perioperative mortality, MI, re-revascularization (R-R), acute renal failure (ARF), and stroke. Fourteen studies with 17,942 patients were included. CABG was associated with lower late mortality (hazard ratio, HR: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: CI 1.05-1.44, p < 0.01). In the pooled Kaplan-Meier analysis CABG showed significantly lower risk of death in the follow-up compared to PCI (HR: 1.08, 95%CI 1.02-1.41, p = 0.005). Landmark analyses confirmed the survival advantage of CABG over PCI after 21.5 months of follow-up (HR: 1.31, 1.19-1.44, p < 0.0001), but suggested advantage of PCI over CABG in the first 30-days (HR: 0.72, 0.64-0.82, p < 0.0001) and comparable survival from 1 to 21.5 months (HR: 0.98, 0.92-1.05, p = 0.652). We found lower risk for MI and R-R after CABG but higher perioperative mortality and no differences in ARF and stroke. CABG appears superior to PCI over time in octogenarians with complex CAD. This survival advantage is associated with fewer events of MI and R-R; however, it comes with an increased risk in perioperative mortality.

Results of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with off-pump first strategy in octogenarian

Background and Aim

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death around the world. Coronary artery bypass grafting offers efficient surgical revascularization for ischemic disease. Both on‐ or off‐pump coronary artery bypass methods provide promising results to octogenarians, once complete vascularization is achieved. However, off‐pump bypass requires a certain level of experience to achieve sufficient results. We have applied an off‐pump coronary artery bypass‐first strategy to all generations since 2008. This study investigated early and long‐term results of surgical revascularization for octogenarians by a team with an off‐pump‐first strategy.

Methods

All cases of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting performed since 2008 were identified and divided into a young group (age < 80 years) and an old group (age ≥ 80 years). Peri‐operative results were investigated retrospectively in both groups and long‐term results for the old group were assessed.

Results

Among the 707 patients, 97% underwent off‐pump bypass, and 94 cases were classified to the old group. Distal anastomoses and ventilator time were identical between groups (young vs. old: 3.3 vs. 3.2; 3.7 h vs. 3.7 h). In‐hospital death rates were 0.5% and 0% in the young and old groups, respectively. With a mean follow‐up of 1318 days, actual 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year survival rates for octogenarians were 92.1%, 81.2%, and 68.3%, respectively. Nearly half of the patients reached their nineties, which was close to the life expectancy of the national general octogenarian.

Conclusions

An experienced team with an off‐pump‐first strategy could provide valid therapeutic options for octogenarians.

Outcomes of a percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians

Background

The data on long-term outcomes for elderly patients with coronary artery disease who undergo invasive treatment is limited. This study aimed to assess long-term outcomes and risk factors for patients over 80 years of age who underwent revascularisation.

Methods

This single-centre retrospective study included ≥80-year-old patients who underwent coronary angiography between 2012 and 2014. Among 590 study patients, 411 patients had significant angiographic changes and had either a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed. Baseline patient characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities, survival to hospital discharge, and long term mortality were analysed. Three-year mortality was assessed.

Results

Three hundred sixty-nine (89.8%) patients underwent PCI and in 42 (10.2%) CABG was performed. Significant differences between groups were detected in heart failure (PCI - 51.2% vs. CABG - 78.6%; p = 0.001), previous CABG (11.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.014), cardiogenic shock (12.2% vs. 0%; p = 0.008). Hospital mortality rate in the PCI group - 10.6%, CABG - 7.1%; p = 0.787. A median 3-year survival rate in the PCI group - 66.1%, CABG - 66.7%; p = 1.000. Chronic heart failure (OR 2.442; 95% CI: 1.530-3.898, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (OR 0.425; 95% CI: 0.261-0.692, p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (OR 0.120; 95% CI: 0.054-0.270, p = 0.001), and LMCA stenosis (OR 2.104; 95% CI: 1.281-3.456, p = 0.003) were identified as independent 3-year all-cause mortality predictors in multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in hospital mortality and survival rates between elderly patients who underwent PCI or CAGB. The majority of elderly patients underwent a PCI and these patients appeared to experience cardiogenic shock more frequently.

Expert Opinion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older People: Does Age Make a Difference?

As many people are living longer, much older patients are now commonly being seen in clinical practice. The management of coronary disease in this group presents formidable challenges. We review the epidemiology of coronary disease in this population and report on the burden of comorbidity, influence of frailty, problems with polypharmacy, interactions and compliance for the older patient. We discuss the management of stable and acute coronary syndromes, the specific anatomical challenges of the older coronary artery, the outcomes of the limited number of trials involving older patients, and review the guidelines available.

Coronary revascularization in the elderly with stable angina

A proportion of elderly with coronary artery disease is rapidly growing. They have more severe coronary artery disease, therefore, derive more benefit from revascularization and have a greater need for it. The elderly is a heterogeneous group, but compared to the younger cohort, the choice of the optimal revascularization method is much more complicated among them. In recent decades, results has improved dramatically both in surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), even in very old persons. Despite the lack of evidence in elderly, it is obvious, that coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has a more pronounced effect on long-term survival in price of more strokes, while PCI is certainly less invasive. Age itself is not a criterion for the selection of treatment strategy, but the elderly are often more interested in quality of life and personal independence instead of longevity. This article discusses the factors that influence the choice of the revascularization method in the elderly with stable angina and presents a complex algorithm for making an individual risk-benefit profile. As a consequence the features of CABG and PCI in elderly patients are exposed. Emphasis is centered on the frailty and non-medical factors, including psychosocial, as essential components in making the decision of what strategy to choose. Good communication with the patients and giving them unbiased information is encouraged.

A Review of Current Diagnosis, Investigation, and Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Elderly Patients

The elderly constitute a sizeable proportion of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population, and this population is continually increasing in number. Guideline-directed therapy is frequently underutilized in the elderly due to concerns about patient safety. However, studies suggest that this subgroup could benefit from many of the conventional and newer therapies available. This paper reviews current literature in the context of contemporary American and European guidance.

The evolution of cardiovascular surgery in elderly patient: a review of current options and outcomes

Due to the increase in average life expectancy and the higher incidence of cardiovascular disease with advancing age, more elderly patients present for cardiac surgery nowadays. Advances in pre- and postoperative care have led to the possibility that an increasing number of elderly patients can be operated on safely and with a satisfactory outcome. Currently, coronary artery bypass surgery, aortic and mitral valve surgery, and major surgery of the aorta are performed in elderly patients. The data available show that most cardiac surgical procedures can be performed in elderly patients with a satisfactory outcome. Nevertheless, the risk for these patients is only acceptable in the absence of comorbidities. In particular, renal dysfunction, cerebrovascular disease, and poor clinical state are associated with a worse outcome in elderly patients. Careful patient selection, flawless surgery, meticulous hemostasis, perfect anesthesia, and adequate myocardial protection are basic requirements for the success of cardiac surgery in elderly patients. The care of elderly cardiac surgical patients can be improved only through the strict collaboration of geriatricians, anesthesiologists, cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons, in order to obtain a tailored treatment for each individual patient.

Myocardial revascularization for the elderly: current options, role of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and outcomes

The increase in life expectancy has confronted cardiac surgery with a rapidly growing population of elderly patients requiring surgical myocardial revascularization. Recent advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques and improvements in postoperative care have made coronary artery bypass grafting an established therapeutic option for the treatment of coronary artery disease in this group of patients. However, conventional coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with significant risk and related morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In recent years off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting has emerged as a safe and less invasive strategy for surgical myocardial revascularization. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting by avoiding the deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass can offer potential benefits to elderly patients requiring surgical myocardial revascularization. This review article provides an overview of the age-related cardiovascular changes, epidemiology of coronary artery disease in the elderly and focuses on outcomes of surgical myocardial revascularization with special emphasis on the impact of off-pump coro-nary artery bypass surgery in the elderly.

Multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in ESRD

Thirty to sixty percent of patients with ESRD on dialysis have coronary heart disease, but the optimal strategy for coronary revascularization is unknown. We used data from the United States Renal Data System to define a cohort of 21,981 patients on maintenance dialysis who received initial coronary revascularization with either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1997 and 2009 and had at least 6 months of prior Medicare coverage as their primary payer. The primary outcome was death from any cause, and the secondary outcome was a composite of death or myocardial infarction. Overall survival rates were consistently poor during the study period, with unadjusted 5-year survival rates of 22%-25% irrespective of revascularization strategy. Using multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards regression, we found that CABG compared with PCI associated with significantly lower risks for both death (HR=0.87, 95% CI=0.84-0.90) and the composite of death or myocardial infarction (HR=0.88, 95% CI=0.86-0.91). Results were similar in analyses using a propensity score-matched cohort. In the absence of data from randomized trials, these results suggest that CABG may be preferred over PCI for multivessel coronary revascularization in appropriately selected patients on maintenance dialysis.

Surgical myocardial revascularization versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in octogenarian patients

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to compare the clinical outcomes of octogenarian (or older) patients who are referred for either surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of all patients 80 years of age who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an internal mammary artery or had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a sirolimus-eluting stent to the left anterior descending artery in our center between May 2002 and December 2006.

RESULTS

Of the 301 patients, 120 underwent a PCI, and 181 underwent CABG. Surgical patients had higher rates of left main disease, triple-vessel disease, peripheral vascular disease, emergent procedures, and previous myocardial infarctions (39.7% versus 3.3% [P = .001], 76.1% versus 28.3% [P = .0001], 19.6% versus 7.5% [P = .004], 15.8% versus 2.5% [P = .0001], and 35.9% versus 25% [P = .04], respectively). CABG patients had a higher early mortality rate (9.9% versus 2.5%, P = .01). There were no differences in 1- and 4-year actuarial survival rates, with rates of 90% and 68%, respectively, for the PCI group and 85% and 71% for the CABG group (P = .85). The rates of actuarial freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 1 and 4 years were 83% and 75%, respectively, for the PCI group, and 86% and 78% for the CABG group (P = .33). The respective rates of freedom from reintervention were 87% and 83% for the PCI group, versus 99% and 97% for the CABG group (P < .001). The 4-year rate of freedom from recurring angina was 58% for the PCI group, versus 88% for CABG patients (P < .001). Revascularization strategy was not a predictor of adverse outcome in a multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Octogenarian CABG patients were sicker and experienced a higher rate of early mortality. The 2 strategies had similar rates of late mortality and MACEs, with fewer reinterventions and recurring angina occurring following surgery.

Incomplete revascularization in the drug eluting stent era permits meaningful long-term (12-78 months) outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years with acute coronary syndrome

Objective

To compare long-term prognosis between complete revascularization (CR) and incomplete revascularization (IR) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

We prospectively enrolled patients ≥ 75 years with ACS and multi-lesion disease between January 2005 and December 2010 at our center (Institute of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital). Baseline clinical characteristics, PCI parameters and long-term (12 to 78 months) outcomes including main adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) were compared between CR and IR groups. We used the Kaplan-Meier curve to describe the survival rates, and variables reported to be associated with prognosis were included in Cox regression.

Results

Of the 502 patients, 230 patients obtained CR, and the other 272 patients underwent IR. Higher SYNTAX score was an independent predictor of IR [Odds ratio (OR): 1.141, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.066–1.221, P = 0.000]. A total of 429 patients (85.5%) were followed with a duration ranging from 12 months to 78 months. There were no significant differences in cumulative survival rates and event free survival rates between the two groups, even for patients with multi-vessel disease. Older age (OR: 1.079, 95% CI: 1.007–1.157, P = 0.032), prior myocardial infarction (OR: 1.440, 95% CI: 1.268–2.723, P = 0.001) and hypertension (OR: 1. 653, 95% CI: 1.010-2.734, P = 0.050) were significant independent predictors of long-term MACCE.

Conclusions

Given that both clinical and coronary lesion characteristics are much more complex in patients ≥75 years with ACS and multi-lesion disease, IR may be an option allowing low risk hospital results and meaningful long-term (12 to 78 months) outcomes.

Overview: Japanese guidelines for myocardial revascularization to treat stable ischemic heart disease 2012

Since its introduction in the early 1970s, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become an established surgical treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), first clinically applied in 1977, was promoted as an alternative to CABG during the mid-1980s. Along with the nationwide expansion of PCI, the ratio of PCI to CABG has exceeded 6-7:1. The Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) published "Guidelines on elective coronary intervention, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), for ischemic heart disease in 2000" and "Guidelines on the selection of bypass conduits and operative procedures in coronary artery bypass grafting for ischemic heart disease". The society intended to revise these guidelines in 2010 and to issue two new guidelines specific either to PCI or CABG. They also planned to issue joint guidelines for myocardial revascularization and PCI/CABG, which are primary indications for patients with stable CAD, especially with those with more complex left main trunk disease and/or multi-vessel disease. The scientific committee of JCS established the "Council for myocardial revascularization" that consisted of experts including interventional and non-interventional cardiologists, cardiac surgeons and physicians specialized in diabetes or nephrology selected by medical and surgical societies. After over 10 rounds of meetings, the Council prepared primary guidelines for myocardial revascularization to treat stable CAD, PCI/CABG. These guidelines consist of (1) Statements about myocardial revascularization, (2) Interpretation of the statements and (3) Indications for PCI/CABG including a table.

Risk of Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background and Purpose—

The risk of stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is known to increase dramatically with age. During recent years, the age of patients operated on has increased and concomitant therapy has changed. Therefore, we have re-evaluated the risk of stroke after CABG.

Methods—

Through the Danish National Hospital Register, we identified all 25 159 patients with isolated CABG from 1997 through 2006. Stroke, comorbidities, and medication were further obtained. Risk factors of stroke were determined through regression models.

Results—

Overall, 1901 patients (7.6%) suffered a stroke after surgery, 477 patients (2.0%) within 30 days after CABG. Rates of stroke per 100 person-years (95% CI) within 30 days after surgery increased with age: <60 years, 10.1 (7.8–13.0); 60 to 64 years, 18.4 (14.3–23.5); 65 to 69 years, 27.7 (23.0–33.3); 70 to 74 years, 36.0 (30.4–42.6); 75 to 79 years, 36.1 (29.1–44.7); ≥80 years, 38.0 (25.2–57.1). Risks of stroke within 30 days after surgery adjusted for age (reference: age <60 years), sex, relevant comorbidities, and selected medication included: 60 to 64 years: HR, 1.7 ( P =0.005; 95% CI, 1.2–2.4), 65 to 69 years: HR, 2.4 ( P =0.001; 95% CI, 1.7–3.3), 70 to 74 years: HR, 2.8 ( P =0.001; 95% CI, 2.1–3.8), 75 to 79 years: HR, 2.8 ( P =0.001; 95% CI, 2.0–4.0), ≥80 years: HR, 3.0 ( P =0.001; 95% CI, 1.8–4.9), previous stroke: HR, 4.2 ( P =0.001; 95% CI, 3.3–5.4), diabetes: HR, 1.3 ( P =0.019; 95% CI, 1.1–1.7), hypertension: HR, 1.4 ( P =0.003; 95% CI, 1.1–1.7), peripheral vascular disease: HR, 1.6 ( P =0.001; 95% CI, 1.3–2.1), renal failure: HR, 1.7 ( P =0.012; 95% CI, 1.1–2.5), statins: HR, 0.8 ( P =0.049; 95% CI, 0.7–1.0), clopidogrel: HR, 0.6 ( P =0.032; 95% CI, 0.4–1.0).

Conclusions—

The increase in stroke with age after CABG is moderate and the relation uncertain in ages older than 70 years. Declining CABG in elderly patients because of risk of stroke purely on the basis of high age is debatable.

Outcomes and cost of cardiac surgery in octogenarians is related to type of operation: a multiinstitutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Given recent economic implications in caring for an aging population, we sought to determine if postoperative complications and costs for octogenarians differed based on the type of cardiac operation.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2008, patients who underwent cardiac operations at 16 different centers were identified from the Virginia Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative and selected into two cohorts (<80 years and ≥80 years). Octogenarians (≥80 years) were stratified into isolated primary coronary bypass graft, aortic valve, mitral valve, or combined operation. Preoperative risks, outcomes, and costs were analyzed. Case-mix adjusted models for mortality and major complication rate were developed.

RESULTS

We examined 45,731 patients, of which 3,079 were octogenarians (82.7 ± 2.5 years). Compared with younger patients, octogenarians incurred higher mortality (6.5% vs 3.1%, p < 0.001) and major complication rates (13.2% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001) with only incrementally higher total costs (p < 0.001). Among octogenarians mortality was similar despite the operation. Cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001), hospital length of stay (p = 0.001), and major complication rate (p = 0.002) were highest for combined operation. Despite the fewest complications, mitral valve operation had the highest total costs (p < 0.001). Type of operation was not predictive of mortality or major complication rate. However, age, female gender, emergent status, and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time were independently associated with death despite risk-adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age confers increased risks and incrementally higher costs in patients undergoing cardiac operations. Isolated mitral and combined procedures have the highest complications and costs. Any proposed cardiac operation in octogenarians mandates careful consideration of resource utilization.

Three-year outcomes of multivessel revascularization in very elderly acute coronary syndrome patients

BACKGROUND

Comparative effectiveness of interventional treatment strategies for the very elderly with acute coronary syndrome remains poorly defined due to study exclusions. Interventions include percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), usually with stents, or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The elderly are frequently directed to PCI because of provider perceptions that PCI is at therapeutic equipoise with CABG and that CABG incurs increased risk. We evaluated long-term outcomes of CABG versus PCI in a cohort of very elderly Medicare beneficiaries presenting with acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

Using Medicare claims data, we analyzed outcomes of multivessel PCI or CABG treatment for a cohort of 10,141 beneficiaries age 85 and older diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome in 2003 and 2004. The cohort was followed for survival and composite outcomes (death, repeat revascularization, stroke, acute myocardial infarction) for three years. Logistic regressions controlled for patient demographics and comorbidities with propensity score adjustment for procedure selection.

RESULTS

Percutaneous coronary intervention showed early benefits of lesser morbidity and mortality, but CABG outcomes improved relative to PCI outcomes by three years (p < 0.01). At 36 months post-initial revascularization, 66.0% of CABG recipients survived (versus 62.7% of PCI recipients, p < 0.05) and 46.1% of CABG recipients were free from composite outcome (versus 38.7% of PCI recipients, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In very elderly patients with ACS and multivessel CAD, CABG appears to offer an advantage over PCI of survival and freedom from composite endpoint at three years. Optimizing the benefit of CABG in very elderly patients requires absence of significant congestive heart failure, lung disease, and peripheral vascular disease.

Off-pump coronary artery revascularization in octogenarians: is it better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Octogenarians are the fastest growing stratum of the population and have the highest prevalence of coronary artery disease. In the past, physicians have been reluctant to provide these patients with optimal care. Seniors are frequently excluded from large randomized trials and generally not included in published guidelines. The purpose of this review is to revisit the demography and epidemiology of coronary artery disease in this population as well as therapeutic strategies used.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent publications have shown significant advancement in medical and invasive treatment of coronary artery disease in elderly, with special focus on the potential benefit of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.

SUMMARY

Although OPCAB surgery has gained popularity over the past 15 years, its benefit regarding operative mortality and major complications has not been clearly defined in the general population. There is a body of literature supporting its benefit in the elderly population. OPCAB surgery has the potential of decreasing operative mortality and major postoperative complications such as stroke, delirium, atrial fibrillation, and decline in neurocognitive functions in these patients. Off-pump surgery is technically more demanding and has been blamed for providing less complete revascularization and lower graft patency rate, especially in less experienced hands. However, with the upcoming demographic explosion of senior citizens in western societies, OPCAB surgery has definitely to be a part of the armamentarium of modern cardiac surgeons.

Evaluation of revascularization subtypes in octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest that octogenarians' long-term survival after complete coronary artery bypass graft revascularization is superior to incomplete revascularization. Discriminating between variable definitions of "complete" complicates interpretation of survival data. We aimed to clarify octogenarian long-term survival rates by stratifying revascularization subtypes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1986 to 2007, 580 patients 80 to 94 years of age underwent coronary artery bypass graft. Functional complete revascularization was defined as at least 1 graft to all diseased coronary vessels with >50% stenosis. Traditional complete revascularization was defined as 1 graft to each major arterial system with at least 50% stenosis. Incomplete revascularization was defined as leaving diseased, ungrafted regions. Revascularization was functional in 279 (48%), traditional in 181 (31%), and incomplete in 120 (21%). Long-term survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Of 537 operative survivors, there were 402 late deaths. Cumulative long-term survival totaled 2890 patient-years. Late survival (Kaplan-Meier) was similar between functional (mean, 6.8 years) and traditional (6.7 years) groups (P=0.51), but diminished with incomplete (4.2 years) revascularization (P=0.007). Survival by group at 5 years was: 59+/-3% functional, 57+/-4% traditional, and 45+/-5% incomplete. Survival at 8 years was: 40+/-3% functional, 37+/-4% traditional, and 26+/-5% incomplete. To minimize selection bias in patients with limited life expectancy, Kaplan-Meier analysis was repeated including only patients with survival >12 months. Survival was again impaired with incomplete revascularization (P=0.04), and there was no difference between functional and traditional complete revascularization (P=0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Bypassing all diseased arterial vessels after revascularization does not afford significant long-term survival advantage compared to a traditional approach. Incomplete revascularization, related to more extensive disease, is associated with an 18% decline in survival. These data suggest that it is important to avoid incomplete revascularization in octogenarians, but the supplementary endeavor required to perform functional complete revascularization does not improve survival.

[Update on geriatric cardiology]

This article contains a review of the main developments in the field of geriatric cardiology reported during 2008. The focus is on research concerning the specific characteristics of elderly patients with heart failure, arrhythmias, ischemic heart disease, and aortic valve disease.