Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3b to 5

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are a challenging and understudied population. Specifically, the late outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with CKD remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To compare overall mortality risk in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD following TAVI versus SAVR.

METHODS

Study-level meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data from Kaplan-Meier curves of studies published by August 2022.

RESULTS

Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent TAVI had a higher 5-year mortality compared with patients undergoing SAVR in the overall population (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.44-1.69, P < 0.001) and in populations with similar risk scores (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.31, P = 0.035). The landmark analysis revealed a lower risk of 30-day mortality with TAVI (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, P = 0.023), followed by similar risk until 7.5 months (HR 1, 95% CI 0.78-1.27, P = 0.978). In contrast, the landmark analysis beyond 7.5 months yielded a reversal of the HR in favor of SAVR (TAVI with HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.49 P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CKD, TAVI provides an initial survival benefit over SAVR. However, in the long run, a significant survival benefit of SAVR over TAVI was observed. Our findings highlight the need for randomized controlled trials to investigate outcomes in this special population.

The Role of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Feasibility Analysis

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the current treatment of choice for good surgical candidates with moderate to severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). As transcatheter aortic valvular replacement (TAVR) has shown an improved one and two-year all-cause mortality, it has been chosen for moderately symptomatic severe AS patients. The purpose of this review was to perform a clinical comparison of TAVR vs. SAVR and to analyze the Health Index Factor (HIF) that makes TAVR a treatment of choice in asymptomatic AS patients. 

An extensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed using the keywords “Aortic stenosis”, “SAVR”, “TAVR”, and “Asymptomatic”. A total of 45 prospective randomized clinical trials in the English language that were published from the year 2000 onwards were included in the final analysis. It has been found that 59.3% of asymptomatic AS patients are likely to die in the next five years without proactive treatment. Multiple studies have proven that early intervention with aortic valve replacement is superior to conservative treatment in severe asymptomatic AS; however, the choice between SAVR and TAVR is not well established. The NOTION Trial, SURTAVI Trail, and PARTNER 3 study have shown the non-inferiority of TAVR over SAVR, during one-year follow-up for low surgical risk patients. Evolut Low-Risk study and Early TAVR are the only two prospective studies performed to date that have enrolled patients with asymptomatic severe AS. The Evolut Trial demonstrated no difference in all-cause mortality at 30 days (1.3% vs. 4.8%. p=0.23), and 12 days (1.3% vs. 6.5%, p=0.11). Additionally, TAVR also decreases the risk of post-procedural atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury (AKI), and rehospitalization, and leads to significant improvement in the mean trans-aortic pressure gradient. TAVR also showed marked improvement in the 30-day Quality of Life (QOL) index, where SAVR did not report any significant change in the QOL index. However, the official recommendations of Early TAVR are still awaited. TAVR has consistently shown a statistically non-significant difference in case mortality, risk of stroke, and rehospitalization with moderate to high surgical risk patients whereby recent initial trials have shown significant improvement in the QOL index and hemodynamic index for patients with asymptomatic disease. More extensive studies are required to prove the risk stratifications, long-term outcomes, and clinical characteristics that would make TAVR a preferred intervention in asymptomatic patients.

Propensity matched comparison of TAVI and SAVR in intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease: a subgroup analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry

OBJECTIVE

We compared TAVI vs. SAVR in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m²) for whom both procedures could possibly be considered (age ≤ 80 years, STS-score 4-8).

BACKGROUND

According to both ACC/AHA and ESC/EACTS recent guidelines, aortic stenosis may be treated with either transcatheter (TAVI) or surgical (SAVR) aortic valve replacement in a subgroup of patients. A shared therapeutic decision is made by a heart team based on individual factors, including chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Data from the large nationwide German Aortic Valve Registry were used. A propensity score method was used to select 704 TAVI and 374 SAVR matched patients. Primary endpoint was 1-year survival. Secondary endpoints were clinical complications, including pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, myocardial infarction, bleeding, and the need for new-onset dialysis.

RESULTS

One-year survival was similar (HR [95% CI] for TAVI 1.271 [0.795, 2.031], p = 0.316), with no divergence in Kaplan-Meier curves. In spite of post-procedural short-term survival being numerically higher for TAVI patients and 1-year survival being numerically higher for SAVR patients, such differences did not reach statistical significance (96.4% vs. 94.2%, p = 0.199, and 86.2% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.316, respectively). In weighted analyses, pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, and were significantly more common with TAVI; whereas myocardial infarction, bleeding requiring transfusion, and longer ICU-stay and overall hospitalization were higher with SAVR. Temporary dialysis was more common with SAVR (p < 0.0001); however, a probable need for chronic dialysis was rare and similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both TAVI and SAVR led to comparable and excellent results in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD in an intermediate-risk population of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis for whom both therapies could possibly be considered.

Early versus late discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and readmissions for permanent pacemaker implantation

OBJECTIVE

To examine the rate of readmission for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation with early versus late discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

There is a current trend toward early discharge after TAVR. However, paucity of data exists on the impact of such practice on readmissions for PPM implantation.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database 2016-2018 was queried for all hospitalizations where patients underwent TAVR. Hospitalizations were stratified into early (Days 0 and 1) versus late (≥Day 2) discharge groups. Observations in which PPM was required in the index admission were excluded. Multivariable regression analyses involving patient- and hospital-related variables were utilized. The primary outcome was 90-day readmission for PPM implantation.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 68,482 TAVR hospitalizations, 20,261 (29.6%) with early versus 48,221 (70.4%) with late discharge. Early discharge after TAVR increased over the study period (16.2% in 2016 vs. 37.9% in 2018, P_trend  < 0.01). Nevertheless, 90-day readmission for PPM implantation remained stable (1.8% in 2016 vs. 2.0% in 2018, P_trend  = 0.32). The 90-day readmission rate for PPM implantation (2.0% vs. 1.8%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.39; p = 0.15) and median time-to-readmission (5 days [interquartile range, IQR 3-9] vs. 5 days [IQR 3-14], p = 0.92) were similar with early versus late discharge. Similar rates were observed regardless of whether readmission was elective versus not. Early discharge was associated with lower hospitalization cost ($39,990 ± $13,681 vs. $46,750 ± $18,218, p < 0.01) compared with late discharge.

CONCLUSION

In patients who did not require PPM during the index TAVR hospitalization, the rate of readmission for PPM implantation was similar with early versus late discharge.

Impact of chronic kidney disease in 29 893 patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement from the German Aortic Valve Registry

OBJECTIVES

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a key risk factor in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We analysed the impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and CKD stages on their mid-term survival.

METHODS

Data from 29 893 patients enrolled in the German Aortic Valve registry from January 2011 to December 2015 receiving TAVI (n = 12 834) or SAVR (n = 17 059) at 88 sites were included. The impact of renal impairment, as measured by eGFR and CKD stages, was investigated. The primary end-point was 1-year cumulative all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Higher CKD stages were significantly associated to lower in-hospital, 30-day- and 1-year survival rates. Both TAVI- and SAVR-treated patients in CKD 3a, 3b, 4 and 5 stages showed significant and gradually increasing HR values for 1-year all-cause mortality. The same trend persisted in multivariable analysis, although HR values for CKD 3a and 5 did not reach significance in TAVI patients, whereas CKD 4 + 5 did not reach statistical significance in SAVR. Likewise, eGFR as a continuous variable was a significant predictor for 1-year mortality, with the best cut-off points being 47.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 for TAVI and 59.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 for SAVR. Significant 8.6% and 9.0% increases in 1-year mortality were observed for every 5-ml reduction in eGFR for TAVI and SAVR, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD ≥3b and CKD ≥3a are the independent major risk factors for mortality in patients undergoing TAVI and SAVR, respectively. In the overall population of patients with severe aortic stenosis, an appropriate stratification based on CKD substage may contribute to a better selection of patients suitable for such therapies.

Worsening renal function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement

Several prior reports have investigated worsening renal function around transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. However, in clinical practice, it seems more important to evaluate changes associated with TAVR-related procedures, including preoperative enhanced computed tomography (CT), as well as the TAVR procedure itself, as CT assessment is considered essential for safe TAVR. This study evaluated worsening renal function during the TAVR perioperative period, from the preoperative enhanced CT to 1 month after TAVR, and then compared the incidence with that in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This retrospective single-center study investigated 123 TAVR patients and 130 SAVR patients. We evaluated baseline renal function before enhanced CT in TAVR patients and before operation in SAVR patients, and again at 1 month post-operatively. We defined worsening renal function at 1 month according to three definitions: (1) an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 1.5-fold from baseline or initiation of dialysis, (2) a decline in eGFR at 1 month ≥ 20% from baseline or initiation of dialysis, (3) a decline in eGFR at 1 month ≥ 30% from baseline or initiation of dialysis. TAVR patients were significantly older and had higher surgical risk scores than SAVR patients. In TAVR patients, serum creatinine levels were 1.00 ± 0.32 mg/dL at baseline and 1.01 ± 0.40 mg/dL at 1 month post-operatively (p = 0.58), while in SAVR patients, these levels were 0.99 ± 0.51 mg/dL and 0.98 ± 0.49 mg/dL, respectively (p = 0.59). In TAVR patients, 7 (5.7%), 14 (11.4%), and 3 (2.4%) patients experienced worsening renal function according to the three definitions, respectively, but there were no significant differences from those in SAVR patients, for any definition. Worsening renal function after TAVR was uncommon, and the incidence rate was comparable to that in SAVR patients, even though TAVR patients had worse baseline characteristics.

Kidney transplantation in valvular heart disease and pulmonary hypertension: Consensus in waiting

Kidney transplantation induces a lesser anesthetic, surgical, and physiological alterations than other solid organ transplantation. Concomitant valvular pathologies expose these patients to poor postoperative outcome. There is a critical gap in knowledge and lack of coherence in the guidelines related to the management in patients with end-stage renal disease with valvular heart disease. The individualized diagnostic and management plan should be based on the assessment of perioperative outcomes. Similarly, pulmonary hypertension in end-stage renal disease poses a unique challenge, it can manifest in isolation or may be associated with other cardiac lesions, namely left-sided valvular heart disease and left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Quantification and stratification according to etiology are needed in pulmonary hypertension to ensure an adequate management plan to minimize the adverse perioperative outcomes. Lack of randomized controlled trials has imposed hindrance in proposing a unified approach to clinical decision-making in these scenarios. In this review, we have described the magnitude of the problems, pathophysiologic interactions, impact on clinical outcomes and have also proposed a management algorithm for both the scenarios.

Urea level is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis

Introduction

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in the western world. Various factors are related to severe AS prognosis, including chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of urea level in patients with severe AS.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 142 patients (79.1±9.4 years, 88 women) with severe AS (mean valve area 0.67± 0.17 cm²). Clinical assessment, blood tests and echocardiography were performed at enrollment and follow up. The patient population was divided into low and high urea level groups, according to the median urea level at enrollment (72 patients, mean urea 35.5±6.2 mg/dL and 70 patients, mean urea 61.1±17.8 mg/dL, respectively). Hundred and twelve patients (79%) underwent aortic valve intervention. The primary endpoint was all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

Outcomes

During follow-up of 37±19.5 months, 56 (37.1%) patients died, 39 due to cardiovascular causes. In univariate analysis, age, urea level, creatinine, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and aortic valve intervention were associated with all-cause mortality. However, in multivariate analysis only aortic valve intervention and blood urea were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (HR 0.494; 95% CI 0.226–0.918, P = 0.026 and HR 1.015; 95% CI 1.003–1.029, P = 0.046 respectively). Urea level, NYHA class and age were also significant predictors of cardiovascular mortality. Whereas, in multivariate analysis, only urea level predicted cardiovascular mortality in these patients (HR 1.017; CI 1.003–1.031 P = 0.019).

Conclusions

Blood urea, a generally readily available and routinely determined marker of renal function, is an independent prognostic factor in patients with severe AS.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Protect the kidneys to protect the patient

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) seems superior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for intermediate-term outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis and moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Intermediate-term mortality and the major adverse cardiac and renal event increase if the renal function worsens soon after TAVR or SAVR. Patient's demographic profile, comorbid conditions, and procedural characteristics influence the clinical outcomes emphasizing the need for careful risk assessment in deciding TAVR versus SAVR in CKD patient.

Early and late outcomes after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in obese patients

INTRODUCTION

Data on the early and late outcome following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in obese patients are limited. We investigated whether TAVI may be superior to SAVR in obese patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m²) who underwent either SAVR or TAVI were identified from the nationwide OBSERVANT registry, and their in-hospital and long-term outcomes were analysed. Propensity score matching was employed to identify two cohorts with similar baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

The propensity score matching provided 142 pairs balanced in terms of baseline risk factors. In-hospital and 30-day mortality did not differ between SAVR and TAVI obese patients (4.6% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.56, and 5.2% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.41, respectively). Obese SAVR patients experienced a higher rate of renal failure (12.4% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.0105) and blood transfusion requirement (60.3% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.0001) in comparison with TAVI patients. A higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (14.4% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.0018), and major vascular injuries (7.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.0044) occurred in the TAVI group. Five-year survival was higher in the SAVR group compared to the TAVI patient cohort (p = 0.0046), with survival estimates at 1, 3 and 5 years of 88.0%, 80.3%, 71.8% for patients undergoing SAVR, and 85.2%, 69.0%, 52.8% for those subjected to TAVI procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In obese patients, both SAVR and TAVI are valid treatment options, although in the long term SAVR exhibited higher survival rates.

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Chronic Renal Insufficiency: Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Objectives

The objective of this study is to determine incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease.

Background

The incidence of AKI in patients with preexisting renal insufficiency undergoing TAVR versus SAVR is not well described.

Methods

All patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease who underwent SAVR for aortic stenosis with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting or TAVR from 5/2008 to 6/2017. Patients requiring preoperative hemodialysis were excluded. Chronic kidney disease was defined as an estimated glomerular filtrate rate (eGFR) of < 60 mL/min/1.73 m². The incidence of postoperative AKI was compared using the RIFLE classification system for acute kidney injury.

Results

A total of 406 SAVR patients and 407 TAVR patients were included in this study. TAVR patients were older and had lower preoperative eGFR as compared to SAVR patients. Covariate adjustment using propensity score between the two groups showed that SAVR patients were more likely to have a more severe degree of postoperative AKI as compared to TAVR patients (OR = 4.75; 95% CI: 3.15, 7.17; p <.001). SAVR patients were more likely to require dialysis postoperatively as compared to TAVR patients (OR = 4.55; 95% CI: 1.29, 15.99; p <.018).

Conclusion

In patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease, TAVR was associated with significantly less AKI as compared to SAVR.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Chronic Kidney Disease

Background We sought to study longer term survival in patients with aortic stenosis ( AS ) and nondialysis chronic kidney disease ( CKD ). Methods and Results We studied 839 patients (aged 78±9 years and 51% male) with CKD and AS on echocardiogram from 2005 to 2012. Longer term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was compared with a CKD group without AS , propensity matched for age, sex, race, left ventricular ejection fraction and CKD stage. Cox models were used to evaluate all-cause mortality and competing-risks regression models censored at time of aortic valve replacement to evaluate cardiac mortality in patients with AS and CKD . Overall, 511 (61%), 252 (30%), and 76 (9%) patients had CKD stages 3a, 3b, and 4, respectively; 93% had hypertension, 28% had diabetes mellitus, and 37% had coronary artery disease. In total, 185 (22%) had mild AS, 355 (42%) had moderate AS, and 299 (36%) had severe AS (66 symptomatic). Patients with CKD and AS had higher cardiac and all-cause mortality compared with controls with CKD and no AS ( P<0.001). Among patients with AS and CKD , there were 156 (19%) aortic valve replacements and 454 (54%) deaths (203 cardiac deaths) at 4.0±2.3 years of follow-up. Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio per 10 mL/min per 1.73 m2: 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29) was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality but not cardiac mortality (hazard ratio: 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97-1.30; P=0.13). Of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, 61% had improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate within 1 year (median percentage change=+2.8% per month). Conclusions Among patients with nondialysis CKD , AS is associated with significantly higher cardiac and all-cause mortality; lower estimated glomerular filtration rate is associated with increased mortality, and aortic valve replacement was associated with improved survival.

Evolution of chronic kidney disease after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

Immediate improvement in kidney function has been reported after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Long-term data, however, are not available.

AIM

To assess the evolution of kidney function in chronic kidney disease stage 3b-5, 1 year after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

METHODS

All patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b-5 undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in a single centre were included. Kidney function was assessed 1 year postprocedure. Improvement or deterioration in estimated glomerular filtration rate was defined by an increase or decrease of 5mL/min/1.73 m², respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 127 procedures were analysed (54 surgical aortic valve replacements and 73 transcatheter aortic valve implantations). Kidney function improved in 51% of patients at 1 year (45% of the surgical aortic valve replacement group versus 57% of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group; P=0.21), and deteriorated in only 14% of patients at 1 year (18% of the surgical aortic valve replacement group versus 10% of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group; P=0.22). Almost a quarter of patients (23%) had an improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate of>15mL/min/1.73 m², and this was consistent at later follow-up. Few patients went onto chronic dialysis at 1 year (three after surgical aortic valve replacement and one after transcatheter aortic valve implantation). Acute kidney injury was an independent prognostic factor for long-term deterioration in kidney function (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.6; P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Aortic valve replacement, whether by surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation, improved estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year in more than half of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b-5.

Comparison of Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

There are few data comparing outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with chronic kidney disease. In this retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample 2011 to 2014, we included a total of 2,820 TAVI and 4,054 SAVR procedures, representative of 14,039 TAVI and 19,835 SAVR procedures nationally. Co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis-requiring AKI, and postoperative stroke. In multivariate analysis, TAVI was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.69, p < 0.001), rates of AKI (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.22, p < 0.001), dialysis-requiring AKI (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.44, p < 0.001), and postoperative stroke (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.53, p < 0.001) compared with SAVR. In 1001 propensity-matched pairs of TAVI and SAVR procedures, TAVI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.99, p = 0.047) rates of AKI (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.46, p < 0.001), dialysis-requiring AKI (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.81, p < 0.001), postoperative stroke (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.98, p = 0.045), significantly shorter length of stay (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.42, p < 0.001), and nonsignificant difference in cost (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.26, p = 0.57) compared with SAVR. In conclusion, TAVI may be a preferable approach to SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis in the setting of chronic kidney disease.

Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with advanced kidney disease: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative for surgically inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Advanced kidney disease may significantly affect outcomes in patients treated with TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

HYPOTHESIS

TAVR is associated with better in-hospital outcomes compared with SAVR in patients with advanced kidney disease.

METHODS

We identified our sample from the National Inpatient Sample between 2012 and 2014, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We included patients with chronic kidney disease stages IV and V and end-stage renal disease as advanced kidney disease patients. We excluded patients with acute kidney injury on admission and patients on dialysis.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, 2485 patients were included in each group. The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality (12.9% vs 6.2%; P < 0.01) was higher with SAVR as compared with TAVR. Patients who underwent SAVR reported higher acute kidney injury (50.3% vs 33%; P < 0.01) and dialysis requirements (26.8% vs 20.1%; P < 0.01). Other secondary outcomes including blood transfusion, atrial fibrillation, iatrogenic cardiac complications, pericardial complications, perioperative stroke, perioperative infections, and postoperative shock were more common with SAVR. With SAVR, the length of hospitalization and hospitalization costs were significantly higher; however, permanent pacemaker placement was more common with TAVR compared with SAVR.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced kidney disease, SAVR was associated with higher mortality and higher periprocedural complications, as compared with TAVR. Thus, benefits of TAVR could be extended in patients with advanced kidney disease who cannot undergo surgery.

Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant recipients

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved to a treatment of choice in high-risk patients and is therefore ideal for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, as patients with end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant recipients. Especially, outcome of this special patient group is very important. 22 patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 undergoing intermittent hemodialysis treatment (CKD 5D) and 8 kidney transplant recipients (KT) with severe aortic valve stenosis underwent transfemoral TAVI. TAVI was successfully performed in all patients. Postinterventional acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in four kidney transplant recipients (KDIGO grade 1: n = 3, grade 3: n = 1) but creatinine/eGFR returned to baseline values in all patients. Short-term (30-day) mortality was 3% (1 patient in CKD 5D group). KT had a higher 2-year mortality than CKD5D patients (31% vs. 53%; p = 0.309), and cause of death was non-cardiac because of sepsis in all cases. The amount of contrast medium during TAVI was not associated with the development of acute kidney injury. TAVI is feasible in patients with CKD5D and in KT. Postinterventional AKI in these patients is often mild and does not impact renal function at day 30, while infection/ sepsis is the leading cause of mid-term mortality.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians: early and intermediate outcome from the OBSERVANT study and meta-analysis of the literature

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of nonagenarians after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) from the OBSERVANT study and to pool the results of the literature on this topic. Aortic stenosis is the most common acquired valvular heart disease in the Western countries, and its prevalence is linked to the phenomenon of population aging. TAVR can be considered as a wise approach to treat nonagenarians, but data on its safety and effectiveness are scarce. Data on 80 patients aged >90 years who underwent TAVR from OBSERVANT study were analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis of published data were performed. Thirty-day mortality in the OBSERVANT series was 6.3 %. None of these patients experienced stroke. Permanent pacemaker implantation was necessary in 20 % of patients. Paravalvular regurgitation was observed in 57.5 %. Survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 79.6, 71.9, and 61.5 %. Ten series provided data on 1227 nonagenarians who underwent TAVR. Pooled 30-day mortality rate was 7.1 %, stroke 2.8 %, vascular access complication 8.8 %, and permanent pacemaker implantation 10.6 %. Paravalvular regurgitation was observed in 60.1 % of patients. Pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 79.2, 68.2, and 55.6 %. Transapical TAVR was associated with a significantly higher risk of early mortality compared with transfemoral TAVR. The results of OBSERVANT study and aggregate data meta-analysis suggest that in nonagenarians, TAVR is associated with low postoperative morbidity and excellent intermediate survival. Transapical TAVR in these very elderly is associated with high postoperative mortality.