Performing Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Repair at the Time of Mitral Valve Operations Is Not Associated With Increased Operative Mortality

Five-year outcomes of mitral valve repair for leaflet prolapse at a medium-sized Norwegian university hospital

Objective. To evaluate patient characteristics and 5-year outcomes after surgical mitral valve (MV) repair for leaflet prolapse at a medium-sized cardiothoracic center. Background. Contemporary reports on the outcome of MV repair at medium-sized cardiothoracic centers are sparse. Methods. Patients receiving open-heart surgery with MV repair due to primary mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse between 2015 and 2021, without active endocarditis, were included. Clinical data, complications, re-interventions, mortality, and echocardiographic data were retrospectively registered from electronical patient charts, both pre-operatively and from post-operative follow-ups. Results. One hundred and three patients were included, 83% male, with a mean age of 62 years. All-cause mortality was 9% during a median follow-up time of 4.9 years. Re-intervention rate on the MV was 4%. Post-operative complications before last available follow-up visit at median 3.0 years were infrequent, with new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter in 16%, post-operative MV regurgitation grade II or above in 17% and post-operative tricuspid regurgitation grade II or above in 14%. Conclusions. These data demonstrate that surgical MV repair for leaflet prolapse at a medium-sized cardiothoracic center was associated with low re-intervention rate and few severe complications. The presented results are comparable to data from surgical high-volume centers, indicating that surgical MV repair can be safely performed at selected medium-sized cardiothoracic centers.

Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Ring Annuloplasty During Mitral Valve Surgery Versus Mitral Valve Surgery Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

Although current guidelines recommend concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and/or dilated annulus, there remains significant variation in undertaking concomitant tricuspid valve surgery (TVA) across different centres. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of concomitant tricuspid valve surgery for patients with moderate or greater TR and/or dilated annulus at the time of mitral valve (MV) surgery.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature using six databases. Eligible studies include comparative studies on TVA concomitant with MV surgery versus MV surgery alone. A meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting outcomes of interest to quantify the effects of concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty.

RESULTS

Two randomised controlled trials and six cohort studies were included in the analysis. 1,941 patients were included in the analysis, of whom, 1,090 underwent concomitant TVA and 851 underwent MV surgery alone. Pooled analysis demonstrated that there was less progression of moderate/severe TR in the concomitant group (3.0% vs 9.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.55; p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs 3.8%; OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.47-1.34; p=0.38). The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the concomitant group although this did not reach statistical significance (7.6% vs 5.3%; OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.85-1.98; p=0.23). Cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in the concomitant TVA group by 20 minutes (mean difference 13.9-26.0; p<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty at the time of MV surgery is associated with a significantly lower rate of TR progression without increasing the operative mortality. There is a trend towards a higher permanent pacemaker implantation rate although this did not reach statistical significance.

Fate of concomitant tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

Owing to a lack of supportive data, tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is usually not addressed in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Here we evaluated changes in TR degrees over time and its impact on survival in patients undergoing CABG.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of 9726 patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 2000 and January 2021. According to preoperative TR severity, patients were stratified into nonsignificant (none to trivial, mild) and significant (moderate to severe) TR groups. We excluded patients who had undergone previous tricuspid valve surgery, pacemaker placement, and concomitant valve or ablative surgery. Propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify associations between TR grade and the primary outcome of all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was change in TR severity on the last echocardiogram.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 380 patients in each group were identified. At baseline, 359 patients had moderate TR (94.5%) and 21 (5.5%) had severe TR. On the last follow-up echocardiogram, TR had improved in 40.5% of the patients in the significant TR group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significantly lower survival in patients with significant preoperative TR compared to those with nonsignificant TR (P < .001). After adjusting for other confounders, survival was no worse in the patients with significant TR group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.38; P = .70).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant preoperative TR improved in 40.5% of patients after isolated CABG. After adjusting for other factors, significant TR did not affect long-term survival.

Ten-Year Follow-Up of Mitral Valve Replacement With the Epic Porcine Valve in a Medicare Population

BACKGROUND

Bioprosthetic surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) remains an important treatment option in the era of transcatheter valve interventions. This study presents 10-year clinical outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent SMVR with a contemporary low-profile mitral porcine valve.

METHODS

This was a single-arm observational study using Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Deidentified patients undergoing SMVR with the Epic mitral valve (Abbott) in the United States between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2019 were selected by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision procedure codes and then linked to a manufacturer device tracking database. All-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, and mitral valve reintervention (surgical or transcatheter valve-in-valve) were evaluated at 10 years by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 75,739 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing SMVR during the study period, 14,015 received the Epic mitral valve (Abbott), 76.5% (10,720) of whom had underlying HF. The mean age was 74 ± 8 years. Survival at 10 years in patients without preoperative HF was 40.4% (95% CI, 37.4%-43.4%) compared with 25.4% (95% CI ,23.8%-27.0%) for patients with HF (P < .001). The 10-year freedom from HF rehospitalization was 51.3% (95% CI, 49.4%-53.1%). Freedom from mitral valve reintervention was 91.4% (95% CI, 89.7%-92.7%) at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world nationwide study of Medicare beneficiaries receiving the Epic mitral valve demonstrates >90% freedom from all-cause valve reintervention and >50% freedom from HF rehospitalization at 10 years after implantation. Long-term survival and HF rehospitalization in this population with mitral valve disease treated with SMVR was found to be affected by underlying HF.

Sex-Based Differences in Concomitant Tricuspid Repair During Degenerative Mitral Surgery

BACKGROUND

Women with mitral valve disease have higher rates of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) than men. Although tricuspid valve repair (TVr) decreases the progression of TR, we hypothesize that there may be sex-based differences in concomitant TVr at the time of mitral valve operations.

METHODS

Adults undergoing mitral valve operation for degenerative disease with moderate or worse preoperative TR at a high-volume center from 2014 to 2023 were identified. Patients with a previous tricuspid intervention were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of concomitant TVr. To evaluate the clinical impact of not performing TVr, a competing risk model compared development of severe TR or valve-related reoperation by sex among patients without TVr.

RESULTS

Most included patients were women (55% [n = 214 of 388]), and the median age was 73 years (quartile 1-quartile 3, 65-79 years). There was no difference in the rate of severe TR by sex (female, 28%; male, 26%; P = .63). The unadjusted rate of concomitant TVr was 57% for women and 73% for men (P < .001). Overall, women had 52% lower adjusted odds of TVr (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006), including a lower adjusted rate for moderate TR (47% [95% CI, 45%-49%] vs 66% [95% CI, 64%-69%]) and for severe TR (83% [95% CI, 81%-86] vs 92% [95% CI, 90%-93%]) Among those without TVr, 12% of women and 0% of men had severe TR or required a valve-related reoperation at 4 years (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with moderate or severe TR undergoing mitral valve operation for degenerative disease were less likely to receive concomitant TVr, severe TR was more likely to develop, or they would more likely need a valve-related reoperation. Evaluation of sex-based treatment differences is imperative to improve outcomes for women.

Pacemaker implantation associated with tricuspid repair in the setting of mitral valve surgery: Insights from a Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

In a recent trial, tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) during mitral valve surgery (MVS) for degenerative mitral regurgitation and moderate or less tricuspid regurgitation (TR) reduced the composite rate of death, reoperation for TR, or TR progression at 2 years. However, this benefit was counterbalanced by an increase in implantation of permanent pacemakers (PPMs). In this study, we analyzed the timing, indications, and risk factors for these implantations.

METHODS

We randomized 401 patients (MVS alone = 203; MVS + TA = 198). Potential risk factors for PPMs were assessed using multivariable time-to-event models with death and PPM implantation for heart failure indications as competing risks.

RESULTS

A PPM was implanted in 36 patients (9.6; 95% CI, 6.8-13.0) within 2 years of randomization, with 30/187 (16.0%) in the MVS + TA and 6/188 (3.2%) in the MVS groups (rate ratio, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.16-11.94; P < .001). Most (29/36; 80.6%) implantations occurred within 30 days postoperatively. Independent risk factors for PPM implantation within 2 years were TA (hazard ratio [HR], 5.94; 95% CI, 2.27-15.53; P < .001), increasing age (5 years, HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52; P = .04), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99; P = .02). In the subset of TA recipients (n = 197), age (5 years, HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P = .04) and LVEF (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99; P = .01) were associated with PPM within 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant TA, age, and baseline LVEF were risk factors for PPM implantation in patients who underwent MVS for degenerative mitral regurgitation. Although TA was effective in preventing progression of TR, innovation is needed to identify ways to decrease PPM implantation rates.

Risk of Pacemaker Implantation After Degenerative Mitral and Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery

BACKGROUND

A recent multicenter trial showed a reduction in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression when tricuspid annuloplasty was performed at the time of surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), but with a 14% permanent pacemaker (PPM) rate. We present real-world outcomes at a high-volume center for degenerative MR surgery with/without tricuspid annuloplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing first-time degenerative mitral surgery between 2011 and 2021 were identified (n = 1738). After excluding patients undergoing aortic, aortic valve, or tricuspid replacement procedures, patients were stratified into mitral surgery alone (n = 1068) vs mitral surgery plus tricuspid annuloplasty (n = 417). Outcomes, including operative mortality, new PPM implantation, postoperative length of stay, and risk-adjusted overall mortality, were compared.

RESULTS

Among 1485 patients in this study, 98% underwent mitral repair. Compared with concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty patients, those undergoing mitral surgery alone were 6 years younger and had lower median The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality. Among concomitant tricuspid repair patients, 85% (355 of 417) had moderate or less preoperative TR, whereas 15% (61 of 417) had severe TR. Operative mortality was 1.4%. The incidence of new PPM implantation was 0.7% (7 of 1068) in the mitral only group and 5.5% (23 of 417) in the concomitant tricuspid group (P < .001). Although unadjusted cumulative survival was lower in the concomitant tricuspid group, after risk adjustment, concomitant tricuspid surgery was not associated with worse overall mortality (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.19; P = .27).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty is safe, with no difference in mortality and a <6% PPM rate at a high-volume mitral center. These data provide real-world context for concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty.

Permanent Pacemaker Implantation and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Concomitant Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TA) during mitral valve repair (MVr) is associated with increased risk of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, but the magnitude of risk and long-term clinical consequences have not been firmly established.

OBJECTIVES

This study assesses the incidence rates of PPM implantation after isolated MVr and following MVr with TA as well as the associated long-term clinical consequences of PPM implantation.

METHODS

State-mandated hospital discharge databases of New York and California were queried for patients undergoing MVr (isolated or with concomitant TA) between 2004 and 2019. Patients were stratified by whether or not they received a PPM within 90 days of index surgery. After weighting by propensity score, survival, heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs), endocarditis, stroke, and reoperation were compared between patients with or without PPM.

RESULTS

A total of 32,736 patients underwent isolated MVr (n = 28,003) or MVr + TA (n = 4,733). Annual MVr + TA volumes increased throughout the study period (P < 0.001, trend), and PPM rates decreased (P < 0.001, trend). The incidence of PPM implantation <90 days after surgery was 7.7% for MVr and 14.0% for MVr + TA. In 90-day conditional landmark-weighted analyses, PPMs were associated with reduced long-term survival among MVr (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.75-2.19; P < 0.001) and MVr + TA recipients (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.28-2.14; P < 0.001). In both surgical groups, PPMs were also associated with an increased risk of HFH (HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.27-1.90; P < 0.001) and endocarditis (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.52-2.51; P < 0.001), but not with stroke or reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to isolated MVr, adding TA to MVr was associated with a higher risk of 90-day PPM implantation. In both surgical groups, PPM implantation was associated with an increase in mortality, HFH, and endocarditis.

A comprehensive overview of surgical and transcatheter therapies to treat tricuspid regurgitation in patients with heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The unique pathophysiologic considerations of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) have led to advancements in surgical and transcatheter treatments. The purpose of this review is to highlight the current surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) to functional TR.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgical repair with ring annuloplasty consistently demonstrates better outcomes than surgical replacement or other repair approaches. However, surgical uptake of TR correction remains relatively low, and operative mortality rates are still high owing to multiple comorbidities and advanced tricuspid valve disease/right ventricular dysfunction at time of referral. Pivotal trials for tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) and transcatheter TV replacement (TTVR) indicate improved quality of life compared to medical therapy alone for high-surgical-risk patients with severe symptomatic TR. Trials are underway to assess caval valve implantation (CAVI), which holds hope for many severe TR patients who are not ideal candidates for T-TEER or orthotopic TTVR. Peri-procedural optimization of right ventricular function remains critical to promote both device success and patient outcomes.

SUMMARY

Clinical outcomes after surgical TV intervention are poor, often due to intervening late in the disease course of TR. TTVI covers a treatment gap for patients deemed inoperable or high-surgical-risk, but earlier referral for TV interventions is still important prior to patients developing multiorgan dysfunction from chronic untreated TR.

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation versus conventional redo surgery for degenerated mitral valve prostheses and rings in a multicenter registry

OBJECTIVES

Degeneration of mitral prostheses/rings may be treated by redo surgery, and, recently, by transcatheter valve-in-valve/ring implantation. This multicenter registry presents results of transcatheter valve-in-valve and repeat surgery for prostheses/rings degeneration.

METHODS

Data provided by 10 German heart centers underwent propensity score-matched retrospective analysis. The primary endpoint was 30-day/midterm mortality. Perioperative outcome was assessed according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Further, the influence of moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on 30-day/midterm mortality was analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2019, 273 patients (79 transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve [TM-ViV] and 194 redo mitral valve replacement [Re-MVR]) underwent repeat procedure for mitral prosthesis/ring degeneration. Propensity score matching distinguished 79 patient pairs. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II-predicted risk was 15.7 ± 13.7% in the TM-ViV group and 15.0% ± 12.7% in the Re-MVR group (P = .5336). TM-ViV patients were older (74.73 vs 72.2 years; P = .0030) and had higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (54 vs 40 patients; P = .0233). Severe TR incidence was similar (17.95% in TM-ViV vs 14.10%; P = .1741). Sixty-eight TM-ViV patients previously underwent mitral valve replacement, whereas 41 Re-MVR patients underwent valve repair (P < .0001). Stenosis was the leading degeneration mechanism in 42 TM-ViV versus 22 Re-MVR patients (P < .0005). The 30-day/midterm mortality did not differ between groups. Moderate or greater TR was a predictor of total (odds ratio [OR], 4.36; P = .0011), 30-day (OR, 3.76; P = .0180), and midterm mortality (OR, 4.30; P = .0378), irrespective of group.

CONCLUSIONS

In both groups, observed mortality was less than predicted. Redo surgery enabled treatment of concomitant conditions, such as atrial fibrillation or TR. TR was shown to be a predictor of total, 30-day, and midterm mortality in both groups.

Contemporary Approach to Tricuspid Regurgitation: Knowns, Unknowns, and Future Challenges

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) worsens heart failure and is associated with impaired survival. In daily clinical practice, patients are referred late, and tricuspid valve interventions (surgical or transcatheter) are underutilised, which may lead to irreversible right ventricular damage and increases risk. This article addresses the appropriate timing and modality for an intervention (surgical or transcatheter), and its potential benefits on clinical outcomes. Ongoing randomised controlled trials will provide further insights into the efficacy of transcatheter valve interventions compared with medical treatment.

Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery Is Not Associated With Increased Operative Risk During Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of robotic mitral valve surgery with and without concomitant tricuspid valve surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic mitral surgery between March 2010 and September 2022 were included. Patients were grouped according to the presence of concomitant tricuspid interventions. The groups were compared for baseline factors, operative parameters, and early postoperative outcomes. Age- and gender-matched groups were also compared for outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 285 robotic mitral surgery patients. There were 59 patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid interventions. In the concomitant tricuspid surgery group, cardiopulmonary bypass time (150.1 vs 128.4 min, P < 0.001) and cross-clamp time (99.2 vs 82.4 min, P < 0.001) were longer. Prolonged intubation was more frequent in the concomitant tricuspid intervention group (5.2% vs 0.5%, P = 0.029). The groups did not differ in terms of mortality, permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement, or other morbidities. Perioperative outcomes were similar after matched group analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative mortality and early adverse outcomes did not increase with the addition of tricuspid intervention in our cohort of robotic mitral surgery patients. The robotic approach for mitral disease and coexisting tricuspid disease may offer safe results without an increased risk of postoperative PPM requirement.

Concomitant tricuspid valve repair for mild-moderate tricuspid regurgitation patients undergoing mitral valve surgery? A meta-analysis and meta-regression

The development of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common complication of mitral valve disease. Although severe TR is usually operated on at the same time of mitral valve surgery (MVS), controversies remain regarding whether mild to moderate TR patients should be operated. Concomitant tricuspid valve repair with MVS for mild-moderate TR patients. Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 20, 2022 to include any observational or randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compare concomitant tricuspid repair with MVS versus MVS alone. Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool study estimates and calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 9813 patients from 25 studies were included. Regarding primary outcomes, concomitant repair group had significantly lower 30 days mortality (OR: 0.66; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.96), all-cause mortality-based on RCTs- (OR: 0.40; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71), cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.86) and heart failure hospitalizations (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.63). However, was associated with higher permanent pacemaker implantation rates (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.45 to 3.00). There were no significant differences in terms of secondary outcomes: tricuspid valve reinterventions, stroke and acute kidney injury. Furthermore, repair group showed lower risk for TR progression degrees (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.16) and decreased mean of TR progression (MD -1.85; 95% CI -1.92 to -1.77). Concomitant tricuspid valve repair in mild or moderate TR at time of MVS appears to reduce not only 30 days but also long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality weighed against the increased risk of pacemaker implantation.

Tricuspid surgery at time of mitral surgery improves survival free from severe tricuspid regurgitation but not quality of life

Objective

The choice to operate on moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during mitral surgery is challenging owing to limited mid-term data. We assess whether concomitant tricuspid operations improve mid-term quality of life, morbidity, or mortality.

Methods

An institutional database identified mitral surgery recipients with moderate TR at the time of surgery from 2010 to 2019. Patients were stratified by the presence of a concomitant tricuspid operation. Quality of life at the last follow-up was assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). Morbidity was compared using the χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Student t test. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimation.

Results

Of 210 mitral surgery recipients, 67 (31.9%) underwent concomitant tricuspid surgery. The concomitant tricuspid surgery cohort had greater preoperative dialysis use (10.5% vs 3.5%; P = .043) but similar age, New York Heart Association class, and cardiac surgery history relative to the nonconcomitant cohort (P > .05 for all). The concomitant tricuspid surgery cohort had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (144 minutes vs 122 minutes; P = .005) but a similar rate of mitral repair (P = .220). Postoperative KCCQ-12 scores reflected high quality of life in both cohorts (95.1 vs 89.1; P = .167). The concomitant tricuspid surgery cohort trended toward a higher perioperative pacemaker placement rate (22.8% vs 12.7%; P = .088) but were less likely to develop severe TR (0.0% vs 13.0%; P = .004). Overall survival was comparable between the 2 cohorts at 1 year (84.9% vs 81.6%; P = .628) and 5 years (73.5% vs 57.9%; P = .078). Five-year survival free from severe TR was higher in the concomitant cohort (73.5% vs 54.3%; P = .032).

Conclusions

Concomitant tricuspid surgery for moderate TR is associated with increased 5-year survival free from severe TR but not with increased quality of life.

Pacemaker implantation following tricuspid valve annuloplasty

Objective

Tricuspid annuloplasty is associated with increased risk of atrioventricular block and subsequent implantation of a permanent pacemaker. However, the exact incidence of permanent pacemaker, associated risk factors, and outcomes in this frame remain debated. The aim of the study was to report permanent pacemaker incidence, risk factors, and outcomes after tricuspid annuloplasty from nationwide databases.

Methods

By using data from multiple Swedish mandatory national registries, all patients (n = 1502) who underwent tricuspid annuloplasty in Sweden from 2006 to 2020 were identified. Patients who needed permanent pacemaker within 30 days from surgery were compared with those who did not. The cumulative incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation was estimated. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to identify risk factors of 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation. The association between permanent pacemaker implantation and long-term survival was evaluated with multivariable Cox regression.

Results

The 30-day permanent pacemaker rate was 14.2% (214/1502). Patients with permanent pacemakers were older (69.8 ± 10.3 years vs 67.5 ± 12.4 years, P = .012). Independent risk factors of permanent pacemaker implantation were concomitant mitral valve surgery (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.34-3.27), ablation surgery (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.12-2.23), and surgery performed in a low-volume center (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.17-2.83). Permanent pacemaker implantation was not associated with increased long-term mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.03).

Conclusions

This nationwide study demonstrated a high risk of permanent pacemaker implantation within 30 days of tricuspid annuloplasty. However, patients who needed a permanent pacemaker did not have worse long-term survival, and the cumulative incidence of heart failure and major adverse cardiovascular events was similar to patients who did not receive a permanent pacemaker.

Progression of Non-Significant Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Regurgitation

Little is known about the natural history of non-significant mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (MR and TR) following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for aortic regurgitation (AR). We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients (median age 64 (IQR, 55-74) years, 76.6% males) who underwent SAVR for AR. Subjects with significant non-aortic valvulopathies, prior/concomitant valvular interventions, or congenital heart disease were excluded. The cohort was evaluated for MR/TR progression and, based on the latter's occurrence, for echocardiographic and clinical indices of heart failure and mortality. By 5.8 (IQR, 2.8-11.0) years post-intervention, moderate or severe MR occurred in 20 (10.9%) patients, moderate or severe TR in 25 (13.5%), and either of the two in 36 (19.6%). Patients who developed moderate or severe MR/TR displayed greater biventricular disfunction and functional limitation and were less likely to be alive at 7.0 (IQR, 3.4-12.1) years compared to those who did not (47.2 vs. 79.7%, p < 0.001). The emergence of significant MR/TR was associated with preoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter, symptomatic heart failure, and above-mild MR/TR as well as concomitant composite graft use, but not with baseline echocardiographic measures of biventricular function and dimensions, aortic valve morphology, or procedural aspects. In conclusion, among patients undergoing SAVR for AR, significant MR/TR developed in one fifth by six years, correlated with more adverse course, and was anticipated by baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables.

Risk of Surgical Mitral Valve Repair for Primary Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Risk estimation for surgical intervention is an essential component of heart team shared decision-making. However, current mitral valve (MV) surgery risk models used in practice lack etiologic or procedural specificity. The purpose of this study was to establish a comprehensive method for assessment of operative risk of MV repair of primary mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

A novel etiology and procedure-specific algorithm identified 53,462 consecutive (July 2014 to June 2020) intention-to-treat MV repair patients with primary MR from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Risk models were fit for 30-day operative mortality, mortality and/or major morbidity, and conversion-to-replacement (CONV). As-treated mortality and morbidity models were derived separately.

RESULTS

Event rates for mortality (n = 619; 1.16%), mortality plus morbidity (n = 4746; 8.88%), and CONV (n = 3399; 6.36%) were low. Mortality was higher in CONV patients vs repair (3.18% vs 1.02%). All event rates were lower with increasing program volumes. The mortality risk model had excellent discrimination (AUC: 0.807) and calibration and confirmed very low mortality risk for isolated MV repair for primary MR, with mean mortality risk of 1.16% and median of 0.55% (interquartile range: 0.30%-1.17%) with 90th and 95th percentiles 2.48% and 3.99%, respectively. The mortality risk was <0.5% in patients <65 years of age, with 97% of the total population across age groups having a risk of <3%. Only 1 in 4 patients age 75 or older had >3% estimated risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This etiologic and procedure-specific risk model establishes that the contemporary mortality risk of MV repair for primary MR is <1% for the vast majority of patients.

Risk of Surgical Mitral Valve Repair for Primary Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Risk estimation for surgical intervention is an essential component of heart team shared decision-making. However, current mitral valve (MV) surgery risk models used in practice lack etiologic or procedural specificity.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to establish a comprehensive method for assessment of operative risk of MV repair of primary mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

A novel etiology and procedure-specific algorithm identified 53,462 consecutive (July 2014 to June 2020) intention-to-treat MV repair patients with primary MR from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Risk models were fit for 30-day operative mortality, mortality and/or major morbidity, and conversion-to-replacement (CONV). As-treated mortality and morbidity models were derived separately.

RESULTS

Event rates for mortality (n = 619; 1.16%), mortality plus morbidity (n = 4,746; 8.88%), and CONV (n = 3,399; 6.36%) were low. Mortality was higher in CONV patients vs repair (3.18% vs 1.02%). All event rates were lower with increasing program volumes. The mortality risk model had excellent discrimination (AUC: 0.807) and calibration and confirmed very low mortality risk for isolated MV repair for primary MR, with mean mortality risk of 1.16% and median of 0.55% (IQR: 0.30%-1.17%) with 90th and 95th percentiles 2.48% and 3.99%, respectively. The mortality risk was <0.5% in patients <65 years of age, with 97% of the total population across age groups having a risk of <3%. Only 1 in 4 patients age 75 or older had >3% estimated risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This etiologic and procedure-specific risk model establishes that the contemporary mortality risk of MV repair for primary MR is <1% for the vast majority of patients.

Tricuspid repair in mitral regurgitation surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Concomitant tricuspid repair in MR surgery is indicated in patients with severa tricuspid regurgitation, however, concomitant repair in less-than-severe TR patients is still a matter of debate.

METHODS

In December 2021, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing isolated MR surgery versus MR surgery with concomitant TR annuloplasty. Four studies were included, resulting in 651 patients (323 in the prophylactic tricuspid intervention group and 328 in the no tricuspid intervention group).

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis showed a similar all-cause mortality and perioperative mortality for concomitant prophylactic tricuspid repair when compared with no tricuspid intervention (pooled odds ratio (OR), 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-1.15, P = 0.11; I2 = 0% and pooled OR, 0.54; 95% CI: 0.25-1.15, P = 0.11; I2 = 0%, respectively) in patients undergoing MV surgery. despite a significantly lower TR progression (pooled OR, 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02-0.24, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%). Additionally, similar New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III and IV were identified in both concomitant prophylactic tricuspid repair and no tricuspid intervention, despite a lower trend in the tricuspid intervention group (pooled OR, 0.63; 95% CI: 0.38-1.06, P = 0.08; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our pooled analyses suggested that TV repair at the time of MV surgery in patients with moderate or less-than-moderate TR did not impact on perioperative or postoperative all-cause mortality, despite reducing TR severity and TR progression following the intervention.

Minimally Invasive Approaches Are Safe for Concomitant Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Objective:

The need for concomitant tricuspid surgery during mitral valve surgery is associated with higher operative risk. We hypothesized that concomitant tricuspid surgery through a minimally invasive thoracotomy (MICS) is associated with noninferior risk compared with a sternotomy.

Methods:

All patients undergoing mitral valve surgery at a single institution (2010 to 2020) were evaluated. After excluding endocarditis, emergent operations, and concomitant aortic valve or coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, patients were stratified by MICS versus sternotomy. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the risk-adjusted association between concomitant tricuspid valve procedure and Society of Thoracic Surgeons major morbidity or mortality. An interaction term evaluated the impact of approach on concomitant tricuspid surgery.

Results:

A total of 772 patients underwent mitral valve surgery, including 138 (17.9%) with concomitant tricuspid valve operation. Of the total cohort, 243 patients (31.5%) underwent the MICS approach. Concomitant tricuspid operation was performed in 104 sternotomy patients (19.7%) compared with 34 MICS patients (14.0%, P = 0.056). After risk adjustment, patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid valve surgery via sternotomy had nearly 2 times greater odds of morbidity and mortality relative to those undergoing isolated mitral surgery via sternotomy (adjOR = 1.86, P = 0.049), while patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid surgery via the MICS approach had no increased risk of the composite outcome (adjOR = 0.66, P = 0.543), relative to isolated mitral surgery via MICS approach.

Conclusions:

Concomitant tricuspid surgery at the time of mitral valve surgery carries additional risk in a broad patient population. A minimally invasive approach appears to be safe for selected patients requiring concomitant tricuspid valve surgery.

Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Tricuspid Repair in patients undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid valve surgery is recommended for both, classes I and IIb while being essential for class II patients undergoing MVS.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

The meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tricuspid valve repair in patients undergoing MVS.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar through January 2022, and studies comparing patients with tricuspid valve repair (TVR) and those without TVR were selected. The primary outcome was 30-day and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, 20 studies were included with a patient population of 72,422. 30-day mortality studies (RR: 1.14, 95% CI [0.69, 1.87]) and all-cause mortality studies (RR: 1.16, 95% CI [0.86, 1.57]) at follow-up both were insignificant. From the secondary outcomes, pacemaker insertion (RR: 2.62, 95% CI [2.24, 3.06]), new-onset TR or progression (RR: 0.32, 95% CI [0.16, 0.66]), stroke (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.05, 1.42]), cross-clamp time (WMD: 17.67, 95% CI [13.96, 21.37]), surgery time (WMD: 43.59, 95% CI [37.07, 50.10]), ICU time (WMD: 19.50, 95% CI [9.31, 29.67]), and ventilation time (WMD: 6.62, 95% CI [0.69, 12.55]) were significant. Whereas major bleeding events, atrial fibrillation, renal failure, heart failure hospitalization, postoperative MI, wound infection, early or prolonged morbidity, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and duration of hospital stay were non-significant.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was observed between patients undergoing TVR with MVS in comparison to MVS group only for the primary outcomes, 30-day mortality and all-cause mortality, respectively.

Surgical management of tricuspid regurgitation: a new algorithm to minimise recurrent tricuspid regurgitation

Introduction

Recurrent tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is frequently observed after cardiac surgery; however, the correct approach remains controversial. We developed an algorithm for action on the tricuspid valve (TV) and conducted a 1-year follow-up study. The aim was to assess the efficacy of the algorithm to minimise residual TR after TV surgery. The hypothesis was that the TR rate at 1 year would be reduced by selecting the surgical approach in accordance with a set of preoperative clinical and echocardiographic variables.

Methods

A prospective, observational, single-centre study was performed in 76 consecutive patients with TV involvement. A protocol was designed for their inclusion, and data on their clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were gathered at 3 months and 1-year postsurgery. The treatment of patients depended on the degree of TR. Surgery was performed in all patients with severe or moderate-to-severe TR and in those with mild or moderate TR alongside the presence of certain clinical or echocardiographic factors. They underwent annuloplasty or extended valve repair when the TV was distorted. If repair techniques were not feasible, a prosthesis was implanted. Residual TR rates were compared with published reports, and predictors of early/late mortality and residual TR were evaluated.

Results

TR was functional in 69.9% of patients. Rigid ring annuloplasty was performed in 35.7% of patients, De Vega annuloplasty in 27.1%, extended repair in 11.4% and prosthetic replacement in 25.7%. TR was moderate or worse in 8.19% of patients (severe in 3.27%) at 1 year postintervention. No clinical, surgical or epidemiological variables were significantly associated with residual TR persistence, although annulus diameter showed a close-to-significant association. Total mortality was 12.85% for all causes and 10% for cardiovascular causes. In multivariate analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction was related to both early and late mortality.

Conclusions

Severe residual TR was significantly less frequent than reported in other series, being observed in less than 4% of patients at 1-year postsurgery.

Tricuspid regurgitation management: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a highly prevalent condition and an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. Multiple clinical guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of TR, but the recommendations may sometimes vary. We systematically reviewed high-quality guidelines with a specific focus on areas of agreement, disagreement, and gaps in evidence. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (1 January 2011 to 30 August 2021), the Guidelines International Network International, Guideline Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, Google Scholar, and websites of relevant organizations for contemporary guidelines that were rigorously developed (as assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool). Three guidelines were finally retained. There was consensus on a TR grading system, recognition of isolated functional TR associated with atrial fibrillation, and indications for valve surgery in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic patients, primary vs. secondary TR, and isolated TR forms. Discrepancies exist in the role of biomarkers, complementary multimodality imaging, exercise echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing for risk stratification and clinical decision-making of progressive TR and asymptomatic severe TR, management of atrial functional TR, and choice of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI). Risk-based thresholds for quantitative TR grading, robust risk score models for TR surgery, surveillance intervals, population-based screening programmes, TTVI indications, and consensus on endpoint definitions are lacking.

Long-Term Impact of Preventive Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty on Right Ventricular Remodeling

In patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR), concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) annuloplasty at the time of left-sided valve surgery is indicated in case of a dilated TV annulus ≥40 mm independent of the presence or severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, the long-term impact on right ventricular (RV) adverse remodeling is less well established and the benefit of preventive TV annuloplasty remains controversial. The aim of the study was to assess differences in long-term RV adverse remodeling and the development of significant TR in those patients. In total, 98 patients (mean age 65 ± 11 years, 85% men) with significant primary MR and TV annulus dilatation ≥40 mm without significant TR who underwent mitral valve (MV) repair with or without concomitant TV annuloplasty were included. Of the 98 patients, 28 patients underwent isolated MV repair without TV annuloplasty and 70 patients received concomitant TV annuloplasty at the time of MV surgery. The RV basal diameter (p = 0.03), RV long-axis diameter (p = 0.04), RV end-diastolic area (p <0.01), and RV end-systolic area (p = 0.03) showed less adverse remodeling at follow-up in patients with concomitant TV annuloplasty compared with patients without TV annuloplasty. Additionally, 4 patients (14%) in the subgroup without TV annuloplasty developed significant TR during follow-up in contrast to zero patients in the subgroup with TV annuloplasty (p = 0.001). In conclusion, concomitant preventive TV annuloplasty during MV surgery in patients with primary MR, no significant TR and a tricuspid annulus (≥40 mm) prevented RV adverse remodeling and the development of significant TR at long-term follow-up.

Concomitant Tricuspid Repair in Patients with Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid regurgitation is common in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation. However, the evidence base is insufficient to inform a decision about whether to perform tricuspid-valve repair during mitral-valve surgery in patients who have moderate tricuspid regurgitation or less-than-moderate regurgitation with annular dilatation.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 401 patients who were undergoing mitral-valve surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation to receive a procedure with or without tricuspid annuloplasty (TA). The primary 2-year end point was a composite of reoperation for tricuspid regurgitation, progression of tricuspid regurgitation by two grades from baseline or the presence of severe tricuspid regurgitation, or death.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent mitral-valve surgery plus TA had fewer primary-end-point events than those who underwent mitral-valve surgery alone (3.9% vs. 10.2%) (relative risk, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.86; P = 0.02). Two-year mortality was 3.2% in the surgery-plus-TA group and 4.5% in the surgery-alone group (relative risk, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.88). The 2-year prevalence of progression of tricuspid regurgitation was lower in the surgery-plus-TA group than in the surgery-alone group (0.6% vs. 6.1%; relative risk, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.69). The frequencies of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, functional status, and quality of life were similar in the two groups at 2 years, although the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the surgery-plus-TA group than in the surgery-alone group (14.1% vs. 2.5%; rate ratio, 5.75; 95% CI, 2.27 to 14.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing mitral-valve surgery, those who also received TA had a lower incidence of a primary-end-point event than those who underwent mitral-valve surgery alone at 2 years, a reduction that was driven by less frequent progression to severe tricuspid regurgitation. Tricuspid repair resulted in more frequent permanent pacemaker implantation. Whether reduced progression of tricuspid regurgitation results in long-term clinical benefit can be determined only with longer follow-up. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the German Center for Cardiovascular Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02675244.).

Results after Repair of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation with a Three-Dimensional Annuloplasty Ring

Background: Tricuspid valve (TV) repair is the recommended treatment for severe functional tricuspid regurgitation (fTR) in patients undergoing left-sided surgery. For this purpose, a wide range of annuloplasty devices differing in form and flexibility are available. This study reports the results using a three-dimensional annuloplasty ring (Medtronic, Contour 3D Ring) for TV repair and analysis of risk factors. Methods: A cohort of 468 patients who underwent TV repair (TVr) with a concomitant cardiac procedure from December 2010 to January 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. Results: At follow-up, 96.1% of patients had no/trivial or mild TR. The 30-day mortality was 4.7%; it significantly differed between electively performed operations (2.7%) and urgent/emergent operations (11.7%). Risk factors for recurrent moderate and severe TR were LVEF < 50%, TAPSE < 16 mm, and moderate mitral valve (MV) regurgitation at follow-up. Preoperatively reduced renal function lead to a higher 30-day and overall mortality. Reoperation of the TV was required in six patients (1.6%). Risk factors for TV related reoperations were preoperative TV annulus over 50 mm and an implanted permanent pacemaker. Conclusions: TVr with the Contour 3D annuloplasty ring shows low TR recurrence and reoperation rates. Risk-factor analysis for the recurrence of TR revealed the importance of left- and right-ventricular function.

The risk factors of the early postoperative residual tricuspid regurgitation after concomitant thoracoscopic tricuspid valve repair

OBJECTIVE

Secondary tricuspid regurgitation will be aggravated if left uncorrected during the initial surgery. Recently, an aggressive strategy of routine concomitant tricuspid valve repair has been warranted. Follow this strategy, routine concomitant thoracoscopic tricuspid valve repair was performed and the surgical effect and postoperative residual TR were reviewed.

METHODS

A two-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted. Patients who underwent concomitant thoracoscopic tricuspid valve repair performed by the same surgeon between May 2012 to April 2020 were recruited into the study. The data were collected from the hospital database and outpatient records from the most recent follow-up to analysis.

RESULTS

There were 504 patients recruited in this study. No death occurred and all patients were discharged. The average follow-up time was 7.4 ± 7.5 months. After the surgery, the dimension of right ventricle and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were reduced significantly. There were 11 cases (2.2%) of postoperative residual tricuspid regurgitation. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed left atrial dimension (p = .002) and tricuspid regurgitation (p = .002) positively associated with the residual tricuspid regurgitation occurrence rate significantly. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated the more severe the tricuspid regurgitation, the higher the residual tricuspid regurgitation occurrence rate (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tricuspid valve repair surgery may improve the patients' prognosis effectively if it was performed at the appropriate timing. The larger the left atrial dimension is, or the more severe the tricuspid regurgitation is, the higher the residual tricuspid regurgitation occurrence rate after concomitant thoracoscopic tricuspid valve repair. Our experience has shown that concomitant thoracoscopic tricuspid valve repair is reliable, effective, and safe, which may be beneficial to right heart remodeling in the short to midterm.

Effects of Transapical Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation

Purpose: In this study, transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TAMVI) was compared with surgical redo mitral valve replacement (SRMVR) in terms of clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with degenerated mitral bioprosthesis or failed annuloplasty rings who underwent redo SRMVR or TAMVI at our medical center. Clinical outcomes were based on echocardiography results.

Results: We retrospectively identified patients with symptomatic mitral bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (n = 58) and failed annuloplasty rings (n = 14) who underwent redo SRMVR (n = 36) or TAMVI (n = 36). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores were higher in the TAMVI group (median: 9.52) than in the SRMVR group (median: 5.59) (p-value = 0.02). TAMVI patients were more severe in New York Heart Association (p-value = 0.04). The total procedure time (skin to skin) and length of stay after procedures were significantly shorter in the TAMVI group, and no significant difference in mortality was noted after adjustment for confounding factors (p-value = 0.11). The overall mean mitral valve pressure gradient was lower in the TAMVI group than in the SRMVR group at 24 months (p < 0.01). Both groups presented a decrease in the severity of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation at 3–24 months.

Conclusions: In conclusion, the statistical analysis is still not robust enough to make a claim that TAMVI is an appropriate alternative. The outcome of the patient appears only to be related to the patient's pre-operative STS score. Additional multi-center, longitudinal studies are warranted to adequately assess the effect of TAMVI.

Concomitant tricuspid valve surgery is beneficial at the time of left-sided valve surgery

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the impact of secondary functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and concomitant tricuspid valve repair (TVr) at the time of left-sided valve operations.

METHODS

Adults undergoing left-sided valve operations between 2010 and 2019 at a multihospital academic institution were included. Patients were stratified into three groups: less-than-moderate TR without TVr (Group 1), moderate-or-greater TR without TVr (Group 2), and moderate-or-greater TR with TVr (Group 3). Primary outcomes included survival and hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes included major postoperative morbidities. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated risk-adjusted mortality and readmission.

RESULTS

About 3444 patients were included in the analysis and were stratified into Group 1 (n = 2612, 75.8%), Group 2 (n = 563, 16.3%), and Group 3 (n = 269, 7.8%). Patients with moderate or greater TR (Groups 2 and 3) had higher rates of mortality, hospital readmissions and major postoperative complications including reoperations, renal failure requiring dialysis, blood transfusions, and prolonged ventilation (all, p < .05). When assessed individually, the Group 3 had substantially higher rates of renal failure requiring dialysis, prolonged ventilation, and reoperations, although the Group 2 had higher rates of 30-day mortality (all, p < .05). These findings persisted in risk-adjusted analysis with the highest hazards for mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-2.2) and readmission (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5) appreciated in the Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of 3444 patients, those with moderate-to-severe TR who did not undergo a TVr at the time of their left-sided valve operation had substantially higher risks of mortality and hospital readmissions compared with those who did undergo TV surgery.

Burden of Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with poor outcomes after cardiac surgery. Guidelines recommend correction of severe TR in patients undergoing left-sided valve surgery but not coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We sought to evaluate impact of TR on outcomes after CABG.

METHODS

All patients (n = 28,027) undergoing CABG in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) regional database (2011 to 2018) were stratified by TR severity. Primary outcomes included major morbidity or mortality, which were compared using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of patients undergoing CABG, 4837 (17%) had mild, 800 (3%) had moderate, and 81 (0.29%) had severe TR. Increased severity was associated with higher rate of preoperative heart failure (none 5162 [23.4%] vs mild 1697 [35%] vs moderate 427 [53%] vs severe 54 [67%], P < .001] and STS predicted risk of mortality (1.0 [0.6 to 1.9) vs 1.4 [0.8 to 2.9] vs 2.8 [1.4 to 5.4] vs 6.2 [2.2 to 11.4], P < .001). Increasing severity was associated with higher postoperative rate of renal failure (426 [1.9%] vs 145 [3%] vs 58 [7.3%] vs 7 [8.6%], P < .001), prolonged ventilation (1652 [7.5%] vs 495 [10.2%] vs 153 [19.1%] vs 22 [27.2%], P < .001), and mortality (344 [1.6%] vs 132 [2.7%] vs 58 [7.3%] vs 9 [11.1%], P < .001). After risk adjustment, mild, moderate, and severe TR remained associated with increased morbidity and mortality (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing TR severity, although independently associated with higher surgical risk, is not accounted for entirely by STS risk calculator. This highlights the importance of TR on operative risk and supports consideration of concurrent tricuspid intervention for patients with significant TR undergoing CABG.

Optimal Tricuspid Annular Size for Tricuspid Annuloplasty in Patients with Less-Than-Moderate Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

Background

We evaluated the association between tricuspid annular dilatation and the development of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Additionally, we determined the optimal tricuspid annular dilatation threshold to use as an indicator for tricuspid annuloplasty in patients with less-than-moderate functional TR (FTR).

Methods

Between August 2007 and December 2014, 227 patients with less-than-moderate TR underwent mitral valve surgery without a tricuspid valve (TV) procedure. The TV annular diameter was measured via transthoracic echocardiography. The TV annular index (TVAI) was calculated as the TV annular diameter divided by the body surface area. The mean duration of echocardiographic follow-up was 42.0 months (interquartile range, 9.3–66.6 months).

Results

Eight patients (3.5%) developed moderate or severe TR. The rate of freedom from development of moderate or severe TR at 5 years was 96.2%. TV annular diameter, left atrial diameter, preoperative atrial fibrillation, and TVAI were found to be associated with the development of moderate or severe TR in the univariate analysis. A cut-off TVAI value of 19.8 mm/m² was found to predict the development of moderate or severe TR, and a significant difference was observed in the development of TR of this severity based on this cut-off (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The progression of TR was not infrequent in patients with untreated less- than-moderate FTR. An aggressive treatment approach can be helpful to prevent the progression of FTR for patients with risk factors, especially TVAI greater than 19.8 mm/m².