Surgery Versus Optimal Medical Management for N1 Small Cell Lung Cancer

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with resected small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was recommended for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with complete or partial response to primary chemoradiotherapy. But it is still controversial regarding its role in SCLC patients who have had radical resection. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of PCI in resected SCLC patients. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAl, and ClinicalTrials for controlled trials and cohort studies regarding PCI in postoperative SCLC patients. The correlation between PCI and post-operative outcomes in SCLC patients, including survival and brain metastasis rate (BMR), was examined using hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Quality of studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and publication bias was assessed by Begg's test. Meta-analysis of eight studies with 2688 patients in total showed PCI was associated with improved overall survival (OS) for resected SCLC (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.57-0.75, p < 0.01). In addition, subgroup analysis on three studies including 923 patients confirmed the protective role of postoperative PCI in N0 SCLC patients (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97, p < 0.05). There was also a significant reduction in BMR in the PCI group pooled from six studies (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40-0.85, p < 0.01). The use of PCI delayed brain recurrence and improved OS in patients with resected, stage I-III SCLC. Importantly, patients with N0 SCLC can also benefit from postoperative PCI. In future studies, PCI's role in patients with resected N0 SCLC at different T stage may need to be explored.

CD3, CD8, IFN-γ, tumor and stroma inflammatory cells as prognostic indicators for surgically resected SCLC: evidences from a 10-year retrospective study and immunohistochemical analysis

Current clinical guidelines limit surgical intervention to patients with cT1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Our objective was to reassess the role of surgery in SCLC management, and explore novel prognostic indicators for surgically resected SCLC. We reviewed all patients diagnosed with SCLC from January 2011 to April 2021 in our institution. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent prognostic factors were assessed through the Cox proportional hazard model. In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed to evaluate the predictive value of selected indicators in the prognosis of surgically resected SCLC patients. In the study, 177 SCLC patients undergoing surgical resection were ultimately included. Both univariate and multivariate Cox analysis revealed that incomplete postoperative adjuvant therapy emerged as an independent risk factor for adverse prognosis (p < 0.001, HR 2.96). Survival analysis revealed significantly superior survival among pN0-1 patients compared to pN2 patients (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in postoperative survival was observed between pN1 and pN0 patients (p = 0.062). Patients with postoperative stable disease (SD) exhibited lower levels of tumor inflammatory cells (TIC) (p = 0.0047) and IFN-γ expression in both area and intensity (p < 0.0001 and 0.0091, respectively) compared to those with postoperative progressive disease (PD). Conversely, patients with postoperative SD showed elevated levels of stromal inflammatory cells (SIC) (p = 0.0453) and increased counts of CD3+ and CD8+ cells (p = 0.0262 and 0.0330, respectively). Survival analysis indicated that high levels of SIC, along with low levels of IFN-γ+ cell area within tumor tissue, may correlate positively with improved prognosis in surgically resected SCLC (p = 0.017 and 0.012, respectively). In conclusion, the present study revealed that the patients with pT1-2N1M0 staging were a potential subgroup of SCLC patients who may benefit from surgery. Complete postoperative adjuvant therapy remains an independent factor promoting a better prognosis for SCLC patients undergoing surgical resection. Moreover, CD3, CD8, IFN-γ, TIC, and SIC may serve as potential indicators for predicting the prognosis of surgically resected SCLC.

Survival of small-cell lung cancer patients after surgery: A single-center retrospective cohort study

This study summarized and analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients after surgical treatment. The clinical data of 130 patients (99 males and 31 females) with SCLC treated by surgery and confirmed by postoperative pathological examination at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from April 2004 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics, surgery, pathological stage, and perioperative treatment were summarized. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis were performed. Pathological examination revealed that 36 (27.69%) patients had stage I SCLC, 22 (16.92%) patients had stage II SCLC, 65 (50.00%) patients had stage III SCLC, and 7 (5.39%) patients had stage IV SCLC. The overall median survival time was 50 months (95% confidence interval, 10.8-89.2 months). The median survival time of stage I, II, III and IV SCLC patients was 148, 42, 32, and 10 months, respectively. In patients who underwent surgical treatment, postoperative adjuvant therapy and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors for survival (p < 0.05).Lobectomy and lymph nodes resection combined with adjuvant therapy were cautiously recommended for stage I-IIIa SCLC patients.

Excellent survival of pathological N0 small cell lung cancer patients following surgery

BACKGROUND

Current clinical guidelines recommend surgery only for cT1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. In light of recent studies, the role of surgery in the treatment of SCLC needs to be reconsidered.

METHODS

We reviewed all SCLC patients who underwent surgery from November 2006 to April 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively collected from medical records. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic factors were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

196 SCLC patients undergoing surgical resection were enrolled. The 5-year overall survival for the entire cohort was 49.0% (95% CI: 40.1-58.5%). PN0 patients had significantly superior survival to pN1-2 patients (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate of pN0 and pN1-2 patients were 65.5% (95% CI: 54.0-80.8%) and 35.1% (95% CI: 23.3-46.6%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that smoking, older age, and advanced pathological T and N stages were independently associated with poor prognosis. Subgroup analyses demonstrated similar survival among pN0 SCLC patients regardless of pathological T stages (p = 0.416). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed factors, including age, smoking history, type of surgery, and range of resection, were not independently prognostic factors for the pN0 SCLC patients.

CONCLUSION

Pathological N0 stage SCLC patients have significantly superior survival to pN1-2 patients, regardless of features, including T stage. Thorough preoperative evaluation should be applied to estimate the status of lymph node involvement to achieve better selection of patients who might be candidate for surgery. Studies with larger cohort might help verify the benefit of surgery, especially for T3/4 patients.

Pathological Stage N1 Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Can Benefit From Surgical Resection

PURPOSE

Surgery is controversial in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) (except for T1-2, N0M0). This study aimed to analyze the survival of LS-SCLC patients with proximal lobe (N1) lymph node metastases after surgery and appropriate postoperative adjuvant treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed and followed up medical history and survival data of LS-SCLC patients from June 2007 to June 2016, and a total of 68 pathological stage N1 (p-N1) patients who underwent surgical resection and 71 clinical-stage N1 (c-N1) patients who received chemoradiotherapy were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of all the patients was 99.30 months. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of the surgery group was 13.567 months, and the median overall survival (OS) of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 29.600 months and 21.133 months (P-value < .001), respectively. The 2- and 5-year survival rates of the surgery group were 55.9% and 33.7%, and the 2- and 5-year survival rates of the chemoradiotherapy group were 39.8% and 9.4%, respectively. Meanwhile, postoperative thoracic radiotherapy appeared to be associated with a good prognosis (median OS 36.400 vs. 21.333 months, P-value .048), as did prophylactic cranial irradiation (median OS 50.867 vs. 22.600 months, P-value .007) in the surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery may benefit patients with p-N1 SCLC, and in combination with appropriate postoperative adjuvant treatment, surgery may be a new therapeutic modality for SCLC.

Peripheral Tumor Location Predicts a Favorable Prognosis in Patients with Resected Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy. Surgical resection is currently only recommended for clinical stage I patients who have been carefully staged. The clinical outcomes of patients with resected SCLCs vary because the disease is highly heterogeneous, suggesting that selected patients could be considered for surgical resection depending on their clinical and/or molecular characteristics.

METHODS

We collected data on a retrospective cohort of 119 limited-stage SCLC patients who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection from March 2013 to March 2020 at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Correlations were derived using Fisher's exact test. Models of 2-year and 3-year survival were evaluated by deriving the area under receiver operating characteristic curves. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate significant differences between the survival curves and hazard ratios.

RESULTS

The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 35.9 months (range 0.9-105.3 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 45.2 months (range 4.8-105.3 months). Univariate analysis showed that TNM stage was significantly correlated with DFS and OS. The 2-year disease-free rates of patients with stage I, II, and III disease were 76.4%, 50.5%, and 36.1%, respectively, and the 3-year OS rates were 75.9%, 57.7%, and 34.4%, respectively. In pN + patients, multiple (or multiple-station) lymph node involvement significantly increased recurrence and reduced survival compared with patients with single or single-station metastases. Patients with peripheral SCLCs evidenced significantly better DFS and OS than did patients with central tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that TNM stage and tumor location were independently prognostic in Chinese patients with resected limited-stage SCLC. A combination of TNM stage and tumor location was helpful for prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

TNM stage and tumor location were independently prognostic in Chinese patients with resected SCLCs. Patient stratification by tumor location should inform the therapeutic strategy. The role of surgical resection for limited-stage SCLC patients must be reevaluated, as this may be appropriate for some patients.

Propensity score matched analysis for the role of surgery in stage Ⅲ small cell lung cancer based on the eighth edition of the TNM classification: a population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese hospital

OBJECTIVE

Patients with very early stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) can benefit from surgery. However, the role of surgery in local advanced SCLC patients remains controversial. We designed this study to investigate the role of surgery on survival of this subset population.

METHODS

The included patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER database from 1998 to 2016 and Shanghai Chest Hospital of China from 2009 to 2016. Propensity score matching(PSM) was used to balance clinical bias. The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

Among the 3005 stage Ⅲ patients, 570 (18.97%) patients underwent surgery. Compared with non-surgical group, patients undergoing surgery were more likely to be male, had smaller tumor size, mediastinal lymph node involvement and lower pathologic stage. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that surgical patients had a better OS and LCSS before and after PSM. 418 surgical patients were well matched with non-surgical patients. In matched surgical group, there were 224 (53.59%) patients who underwent lobectomy (LB), 147 (35.17%) patients who received sublobectomy (SLB), 31 (7.41%) patients who underwent pneumonectomy and 16 (3.83%) patients with unknown surgery type. The 5-year OS of the 4 subgroups were 28.80%, 12.50%, 8.70% and 13.50%, respectively (P = 0.002). In a multivariable Cox model, SLB (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95%CI, 1.20-1.96; P = 0.001) and pneumonectomy (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95%CI, 1.12-2.65; P = 0.013) were associated with worse OS compared with LB.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection significantly improved OS and LCSS of stage Ⅲ SCLC patients in our study. Furthermore, LB had advantage over other surgery type but further exploration in larger prospective clinical trials is needed.

Octogenarians may benefit from stage-specific small cell lung cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Our study investigates treatment profiles in octogenarian patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and assesses each treatment's role in a stage-specific manner.

METHODS

Patient data from individuals with SCLC aged 80 years and older between 1988 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database were extracted. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients with no treatment and different treatment groups were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method, with stratifications by stage. Cox Proportional Hazard model further identified independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 7,290 patients were included in this study. Notably, 3,358 (46.1%) patients did not receive active treatment. Compared with the no active treatment group, the CSS of patients who received treatment was significantly improved (median 6 vs. 0 months, P<0.001) and further validated in stage subgroups. Chemotherapy combined with local therapy was associated with the best CSS in regional and distant disease stages, with the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) being 0.30 (0.26-0.34) and 0.27 (0.25-0.30), respectively. Local therapy only appeared to confer better oncological outcomes (HR =0.33; 95% CI: 0.25-0.42) than chemotherapy only (HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.29-0.47) in the localized disease stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nearly half of octogenarians with SCLC did not receive active treatment in the real clinical setting, these patients may benefit from treatment. Chemotherapy combined with local therapy may provide the best treatment choice in octogenarians with advanced SCLC, while local therapy appears to play a more critical role in treating those with early-stage disease.

Prognostic factors of patients with small cell lung cancer after surgical treatment

Background

The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend surgical treatment for patients with stages I–IIA small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but it still cannot deny the effect of surgical treatment on other limited-stage SCLC. Although more advanced diagnostic methods are now used for the diagnosis and classification of SCLC, the selection of surgical candidates is still arbitrary.

Methods

Data were collected from patients with SCLC who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2011 to January 2021. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate cumulative survival curves, and log-rank test was used to evaluate differences among different subgroups. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the predictive power of the variables for prognosis and survival.

Results

Smoking index, surgical resection method, TNM stage of postoperative pathology, and postoperative chemotherapy were significantly correlated with postoperative survival (P<0.05), which were independent predictors for postoperative survival. Patients with a smoking index >800 had a higher risk of death after surgery [hazard ratio (HR): 7.050, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.079–16.143, P<0.001]. Compared with patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy, those who underwent other pneumoresections (e.g., wedge resection, segmental resection, sleeve resection) had an increased risk of death (HR: 2.822, 95% CI: 1.030–7.734, P=0.044). Compared with stage I patients, stage II and stage III patients had an increased risk of death, with HRs of 6.039 and 3.145, respectively. Compared with those who received ≤4 courses of postoperative chemotherapy, those who received >4 courses of postoperative chemotherapy had reduced postoperative mortality risk (HR: 0.211, 95% CI: 0.097–0.459, P<0.001).

Conclusions

A high smoking index suggests worse prognosis; therefore, patients who smoke should be advised to quit smoking. Compared with stage II and stage III patients, surgical treatment is recommended for stage I SCLC patients. TNM staging, especially N staging, should be evaluated prior to surgery. Pulmonary lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection should be the preferred surgical treatment for patients with SCLC. Patients should receive at least 5 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery.

VATS Versus Open Lobectomy in Pathological T1 SCLC: A Multi-Center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been widely used in the surgical treatment of thoracic diseases, and it suggested surgical and oncological advantages compared with open surgery. However, reports on the application of VATS in surgery of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are scarce. This study aimed to explore the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical approaches in the treatment of pathological stage T1(pT1) SCLC in terms of safety, clinical outcomes, and lymph node dissection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent lobectomy for pT1 SCLC between January 2014 and September 2017 were identified from the National Collaborative Lung Cancer Database (LinkDoc Database). The patients were stratified based on the surgery approach (VATS or open lobectomy). Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival were analyzed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients with pT1 SCLC met the criteria and were enrolled for this study, including 110 cases of VATS lobectomies and 59 cases of open lobectomies. VATS lobectomy was associated with less blood loss than open surgery (168.1 ± 237.4 vs. 340.0 ± 509.8 mL, P = .002). Open lobectomy harvested more N2 LNs (11.8 ± 8.2 vs. 8.4 ± 5.8, P = .048) and identified more metastasis positive LNs (3.1 ± 6.0 vs. 1.4 ± 3.0, P = .050). Open lobectomy associated with longer overall survival (OS) but has no statistical difference (23.4 ± 13.2 vs. 20.2 ± 10.9, P = .070).

CONCLUSION

Open lobectomy had better lymph node dissection results, and comparable postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and OS to VATS lobectomy. Further studies may still be needed to confirm the recommendation of thoracoscopic approach as a routine surgical procedure for operable SCLC, and until then, open surgery should still be considered.

pN1 but not pN0/N2 predicts survival benefits of prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer patients after surgery

Background

Prophylactic cranial irradiation has been shown to reduce brain metastases and provide survival benefits in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, its role in limited-stage SCLC patients after surgery remains unclear. Further, it is unknown whether the effect of prophylactic cranial irradiation is generalizable in these patients with different pathological nodal (N0-N2) stages, a state indicating the presence of tumor metastases.

Methods

We combined data from a single medical center and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Propensity score matching analyses were performed (1:2) to evaluate the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in SCLC patients after surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify predictors of survival.

Results

124 (18.7%) out of 664 surgically-treated SCLC patients received prophylactic cranial irradiation treatment. Within the entire cohort, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified dataset source, age, pathological T and N stages, adjuvant chemotherapy, resection type, and histology as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Prophylactic cranial irradiation appeared to be associated with a better overall survival, but the difference is marginally significant (P=0.063). Further, we stratified patients based on the pathological N0-N2 stages using propensity score matching analyses, which showed that prophylactic cranial irradiation treatment was superior to non-prophylactic cranial irradiation treatment for surgically-treated SCLC patients with N1 stage only (univariate analysis: P=0.026; multivariate Cox: P=0.004), but not N0/N2 stage (univariate analysis: P=0.65 and P=0.28, respectively; multivariate Cox: P=0.99 and P=0.35, respectively).

Conclusions

Prophylactic cranial irradiation provides survival benefits for SCLC patients with pN1 after surgery but not with pathological N0/N2 stage. Our findings may provide helpful stratifications for clinical decision-making of prophylactic cranial irradiation intervention in SCLC patients.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Prognostic Model for Resected Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background

In this study, we developed and validated nomograms for predicting the survival in surgically resected limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.

Methods

The SCLC patients extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2000 and 2014 were reviewed. Significant prognostic factors were identified and integrated to develop the nomogram using multivariable Cox regression. The model was then validated internally by bootstrap resampling, and externally using an independent SCLC cohort diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 at our institution. The prognostic performance was measured by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve.

Results

A total of 1006 resected limited-stage SCLC patients were included in the training cohort. Overall, 444 cases from our institution constituted the validation cohort. Seven prognostic factors were identified and entered into the nomogram construction. The C-indexes of this model in the training cohort were 0.723, 0.722, and 0.746 for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS), respectively, and 0.816, 0.710, and 0.693, respectively, in the validation cohort. The calibration curve showed optimal agreement between nomogram-predicted survival and actual observed survival. Additionally, significant distinctions in survival curves between different risk groups stratified by prognostic scores were also observed. The proposed nomogram was then deployed into a website server for convenient application.

Conclusions

We developed and validated novel nomograms for individual prediction of survival for resected limited-stage SCLC patients. These models perform better than the previously widely used staging system and may offer clinicians instructions for strategy making and the design of clinical trials.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-09552-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Surgery in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers and is one of the most aggressive tumors, with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. This review summarizes the main results observed with surgery in SCLC, discussing the critical issues related to the use of this approach. Following two old randomized clinical trials showing no benefit with surgery, several prospective, retrospective, and population-based studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery in addition to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with selected stage I SCLC. Currently, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging within a multimodal approach and after a multidisciplinary evaluation.

Abstract

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive tumors, with a rapid growth and early metastases. Approximately 5% of SCLC patients present with early-stage disease (T1,2 N0M0): these patients have a better prognosis, with a 5-year survival up to 50%. Two randomized phase III studies conducted in the 1960s and the 1980s reported negative results with surgery in SCLC patients with early-stage disease and, thereafter, surgery has been largely discouraged. Instead, several subsequent prospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery before or after chemotherapy and followed in most studies by thoracic radiotherapy, with a 5-year survival probability of 36–63% for patients with completely resected stage I SCLC. These results were substantially confirmed by retrospective studies and by large, population-based studies, conducted in the last 40 years, showing the benefit of surgery, particularly lobectomy, in selected patients with early-stage SCLC. On these bases, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging: in these cases, lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy is considered the standard approach. In all cases, surgery can be offered only as part of a multimodal treatment, which includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and after a proper multidisciplinary evaluation.

Propensity Score Matching Analysis for the Role of Surgery in Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of surgery for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is not clear. We aimed to evaluate this issue using a population-based database.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 with SCLC staged T1-4 N0-2 M0 disease were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias between the surgical and nonsurgical patient groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) for the matched patients.

RESULTS

A total of 8,811 patients were retrieved, including 863 patients who underwent surgical resection. After 1:1 PSM, a matched cohort with 1,562 patients was generated. In the matched cohort, surgery was associated with 5-year OS improvement (from 16.8 to 36.7%, p < 0.001) and lung cancer-specific survival improvement (from 21.6 to 43.2%, p < 0.001). Survival benefits of surgery were significant in all subgroups, including N1-2 disease, except for patients with a tumor size >5.0 cm or T3 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SCLC of limited stage can benefit from surgery, including N1-2 disease. However, patients with a tumor size >5.0 cm or advanced T stage may be unable to benefit from surgery.

The effect of extent of resection on outcomes in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There is poor understanding of the comparative effectiveness of lobar and sublobar resections for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We analyzed the National Cancer Database to examine the outcomes of patients undergoing wedge resection (WR), segmentectomy (SR), and lobectomy (LB) for limited-stage SCLC.

METHODS

Patients with cT1-2N0M0 SCLC (2004-2015) who underwent definitive surgery were identified and stratified by extent of resection: WR, SR, or LB. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were margin-positive resection (>R0) and pathologic nodal upstaging.

RESULTS

A total 1948 patients met study criteria: 619 (32%) underwent WR, 96 (5%) SR, and 1233 (63%) LB. Patients receiving LB were more likely to be younger, have fewer comorbidities, and be privately insured. The unadjusted 5-year OS of WR, SR, and LB patients was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27-35), 35% (95% CI, 25-49), and 45% (95% CI, 42-49), respectively. In a multivariable Cox model, WR was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.79) and SR similar OS (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.87-1.67) compared with LB. SR was associated with similar survival compared with LB in a propensity score-matched multivariable analysis as well. WR was also associated with greater odds of >R0 resection compared with LB.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, patients with limited-stage SCLC undergoing WR experienced worse survival compared with those undergoing LB; survival was similar between segmentectomy and LB.

Comparison of treatment strategies for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer who received chemotherapy

Background

The standard care for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome for patients receiving chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus surgery (CS), chemotherapy plus radiation (CR), or chemotherapy plus surgery and radiation (CSR) for limited-stage SCLC.

Methods

Patients with T1-4N0-2M0 SCLC who received chemotherapy from 2004 to 2014 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The overall survival (OS) of these patients, stratified by different stage, was compared in accordance to the method of receiving different treatments using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

Results

A total of 7,204 patients were included, where 1,347 (18.7%) patients received chemotherapy alone, 296 (4.1%) undergone CS, 5,296 (73.5%) patients were subjected to CR and 267 (3.7%) patients were managed by the three combination of CSR. Chemotherapy alone was associated with the worst survival in comparison to the other two method of combination i.e., chemotherapy with radiation or surgery. When compared with CR, CS had no survival benefit in patients with stage in excess of T1-2N0 disease, but was associated with improved 5-year OS in patients with T1-2N0 disease, which ranged from 29.1% to 54.3% (P<0.001). For patients with T1-2N2 disease who received CSR demonstrated superior OS over those who received CR (P=0.004) or CS (P=0.036). Cox regression analysis showed CS was associated with improved OS when compared with CR in patients with N0 disease (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43–0.68; P=0.000) and CSR was associated with better OS in comparison with CR in patients with N2 disease (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55–0.93; P=0.013).

Conclusions

Patients with limited-stage SCLC can benefit from local treatment such as surgery, radiation, and surgery plus radiation. For patients with N0 disease, CS was associated with improved survival in comparison to CR. If N2 was identified after surgery, radiation may be added to improve OS.

[New Advances in the Treatment for Small Cell Lung Cancer]

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a refractory cancer with high degree of malignancy, rapid disease progression, poor prognosis and easy recurrence. In the past 30 years, the traditional treatment of SCLC, mainly chemotherapy and radiotherapy, has not changed significantly, and the effective treatment method for clinical needs is extremely urgent. The rapid development of precision medicine has revealed the molecular biological characteristics of SCLC, so its diagnosis and treatment will into a new era. At present, some studies have shown that anti-angiogenic drugs, immunotherapy and so on have improved the efficacy of SCLC treatment to some extent, and there are more studies on the diagnosis and treatment of SCLC, so a new field of SCLC treatment are coming and bringing more survival benefits to patients. New studies on targeted therapy, anti-angiogenesis drugs and immunotherapy of molecular pathology of SCLC are emerging. This paper reviews the new diagnosis and treatment methods of SCLC to provide new guidance for its clinical treatment.
.

Surgery for small cell lung cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Survey from 2010 to 2015

The role of surgery in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is controversial. This study explored whether surgery offered a survival benefits for patients with SCLC.Patients diagnosed with SCLC between 2010 and 2015 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage of SCLC in these patients was reclassified according to the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. Overall survival (OS) was separately compared according to TNM stage between patients who underwent surgery and those who did not using Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression model was used to identify relevant variables affecting survival. Additional Kaplan-Meier curves were created to compare different types of surgery. Cox regression models and Forest plots were used to identify the predictors of survival in the surgery cohort.A total of 26,659 patients with SCLC were included, among which 627 (2.4%) patients underwent surgery. Surgery was associated with longer survival in patients with stage IA (45.0 vs 20.0 months, P < .001), stage IB (47.0 vs 19.0 months, P = .001), stage IIA (16.0 m vs NR, P = .007), stage III (18.0 vs 12.0 months, P < .001), and stage IV (9.0 vs 5.0 months, P < .001) disease, although the difference was not statistically significant for patients with stage IIB disease. Multivariate analysis identified surgery as an independent predictor of improved survival for all cohorts divided by stages except for stage IIB. Lobectomy was the most commonly performed procedure. Multivariate analysis in patients who underwent surgery identified lobectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.544; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.341-0.869; P = .011) and chemotherapy (HR, 0.634; 95% CI, 0.487-0.827; P < .001) as independent predictors of improved survival in the surgery cohort.In a national analysis, surgery was performed in some patients for both early and advanced-stage SCLC. Surgery for SCLC was associated with improved survival except for patients with stage IIB disease. These results support an increased role of surgery in multimodal therapy for SCLC.

Analysis of unexpected small cell lung cancer following surgery as the primary treatment

PURPOSE

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered a systemic disease and surgery is generally not recommended to treat it. High heterogeneity within the tumor and preoperative diagnostic capabilities can sometimes fail to identify SCLC correctly, leading to a subset of unexpected SCLC patients that are diagnosed only after pulmonary resections.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who were diagnosed as having SCLC only after surgery between 2008 and 2015 at a single institution.

RESULTS

A total of 125 unexpected SCLC patients were identified, including those with pure (p-SCLC; n = 76, 60.8%) and combined (c-SCLC; n = 49, 39.2%) SCLC. Highly differential diagnoses were observed between pre- and postoperative tissue examinations. Sixty-nine (55.2%) patients with postoperatively pathological-proven SCLC, including 31 with p-SCLC and 38 with c-SCLC, were diagnosed preoperatively with poorly differentiated carcinoma (n = 23), squamous carcinoma (n = 14), adenocarcinoma (n = 10), malignant cells with necrosis (n = 10), large cell carcinoma (n = 8), or carcinoid (n = 4). Also, inconsistencies between the clinical (c-) and pathological (p-) stages were found in this cohort, which were less common in patients with preoperative PET examination than those without (24.4% vs. 43.8%; p = 0.032). Multivariable analyses showed that higher p-stage (hazards ratio (HR) = 1.7349, p = 0.0025), sub-lobar resection (HR = 1.9078, p = 0.0395), and a lack of prophylactic cranial irradiation treatment (PCI, HR = 0.3873, p = 0.0057) were unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Non-resection approaches reveal an inadequate diagnosis of SCLC. PET examination facilitates the evaluation of the clinical staging of SCLC. For unexpected SCLC undergoing resection, favorable outcomes can be achieved if radical resection and postoperative PCI are performed.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Surgical Resection Improves Survival in Patients With Early Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of resection coupled with standard chemotherapy on the survival prognosis of patients with early stage small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Patients (n = 110) with mediastinal lymph node-negative SCLC were enrolled in this study. The baseline clinical data of patients with surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test analyses. Ninety-eight patients received mediastinoscopy biopsy, and pulmonary lobectomy or sublobar resection, and 67 patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy after pulmonary lobectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical intervention was associated with longer OS (median OS: 42.14 vs. 33.53 months, p = 0.01) and PFS (median PFS: 25.20 vs. 13.48 months, p = 0.000) compared to resection alone for all patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improvement of survival for N1 patients with stage II (median OS: 36.42 vs. 26.68 months, p = 0.021). The median PFS was 19.02 m (16.08, 21.96) and 13.25 m (10.19, 16.30) (p = 0.031), respectively, for patients of N1 stage who received chemotherapy and those who did not. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that age, TNM stage (N stage, not T stage), and chemotherapy were independent risk factors that might affect overall survival in patients with mediastinal lymph node-negative SCLC. These findings suggest that the application of adjuvant chemotherapy following pulmonary lobectomy is associated with improvements of survival prognoses for patients with SCLC. The combination of surgical intervention with conventional therapy should be taken into consideration as a prospective multidisciplinary regimen for early stage SCLC.