The Optimal Treatment for Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

Economic Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

In the absence of evidence on whether neoadjuvant (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is more beneficial for various tumor treatments, economic evaluation (EE) can assist medical decision making. There is limited evidence on their cost-effectiveness and their prospective evaluation is less likely in the future. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis about EE for NAC versus AC in solid tumor help compare these therapies from various perspectives.

METHODS

Various databases were searched for studies published from inception to 2021. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and economic-specific guidelines. The data were pooled using a random effects model when possible.

RESULTS

The retrieval identified 15 EE studies of NAC versus AC in 8 types of cancer. NAC is the dominant strategy for pancreatic, head and neck, rectal, prostate cancers and colorectal liver metastases. For ovarian cancer, NAC is cost-effective with a lower cost and higher or similar quality-adjusted life-year. There were no significant differences in cost and outcomes for lung cancer. For stage IV or high-risk patients with ovarian or prostate cancer, NAC was cost-effective but not for patients who were not high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The EEs results for NAC versus AC were inconsistent because of their different model structures, assumptions, cost inclusions, and a shortage of studies. There are multiple sources of heterogeneity across EEs evidence synthesis. More high-quality EE studies on NAC versus AC in initial cancer treatment are necessary.

Neoadjuvant vs Adjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Stage II-IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

In patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), recent trials demonstrate survival benefit of chemoimmunotherapy over chemotherapy alone in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. To date, there is no direct comparison between neoadjuvant and adjuvant protocols. We compared neoadjuvant vs adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable stage II-IIIB NSCLC.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database for patients who had undergone an operation for stage II-IIIB NSCLC and who had received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between 2015 and 2020. We used inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding variables and used Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression to explore the relationship between treatment groups and overall survival (OS) at 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The inverse probability-weighted cohort represented 2119 weighted patient cases (neoadjuvant, 1034; adjuvant, 1085). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant OS benefit for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in the weighted cohort (3-year OS: 77% [95% CI, 71%-83%] vs 68% [95% CI, 64%-72%]; P = .035). On adjusted Cox regression, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was associated with a significant OS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.96; P = .027). Among patients for whom pathologic stage data were available, 25% of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy had a pathologic complete response, with an additional 32.5% being downstaged.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy confers a significant OS benefit over adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with resectable stage II-IIIB NSCLC. Although randomized trials are needed to confirm our findings, strong consideration should be given to administering neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy to patients who are predetermined to receive systemic treatment.

Stage 3 N2 Lung Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Conundrum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of stage III N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debated. There is an absence of a universally agreed definition of resectability for this heterogeneous group and a lack of trial data.

RECENT FINDINGS

We reviewed and compared current international guidelines and evidence surrounding management of stage III N2 NSCLC. The Irish and Australian guidelines advise subcategorising N2 disease into N2a (may be resectable) and N2b (never resectable). On the contrary, American and British guidelines avoid subcategorising N2 disease, emphasising importance of local MDT decisions. It is suggested that evidence for resection of stage III tumours is relatively weak, but that stage IIIA should generally be considered for resection, and stage IIIB is not recommended for resection. For resectable disease, surgery may be combined with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy and radiotherapy in selected patients. There is some evidence that technically resectable disease can be treated solely with radiotherapy with similar outcomes to resection. In the event of unresectable disease, chemoradiotherapy has been the traditional management option. However, recent studies with chemoradiotherapy alongside immunotherapy appear promising. There are many factors that influence the treatment pathway offered to patients with stage III N2 NSCLC, including patient factors, team expertise, and local resources. Therefore, the role of MDTs in defining resectability and formulating an individualised treatment plan is crucial.

Clinical management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer in India: An expert consensus statement

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered the most common type of lung cancer (>80% of all lung cancers); patients are often diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease. The management of NSCLC is considered challenging owing to variations in size, an extension of the tumors, involvement patterns, and classification. Although adequate literature and guidelines are available on the management of NSCLC in several countries, an Indian perspective on stage III NSCLC management is lacking. We used the modified Delphi approach to form consensus statements. A thorough literature search was done. The authors then convened and deliberated over published literature, available guidelines, and clinical judgment. Recommendation statements were formed for different clinical scenarios. These statements were sent as a form of survey to other oncologists, and their responses were recorded and mentioned. Evidence-based statements were formed for diagnosing and managing stage III NSCLC. These recommendation statements cover various aspects-surgical, radiation, and medical treatment in various clinical scenarios including adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and consolidation therapies.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2023 Expert Consensus Document: Staging and multidisciplinary management of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Novel targeted therapy and immunotherapy drugs have recently been approved for use in patients with surgically resectable lung cancer. Accurate staging, early molecular testing, and knowledge of recent trials are critical to optimize oncologic outcomes in these patients.

The prognosis of clinical stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer in Taiwan

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. The treatment of stage IIIa remained the most controversial of all stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reported on the heterogenicity and current treatment strategies of stage IIIa NSCLC in Taiwan. This study is a retrospective analysis using data from the Taiwan Society of Cancer Registry between January 2010 and December 2018. 4232 patients with stage IIIa NSCLC were included. Based on cell type, the best 5-year OS (40.40%) occurred among adenocarcinoma victims. The heterogenicity of T1N2 had the best 5-year OS (47.62%), followed by T4N0 (39.82%), and the others. Patients who underwent operations had better 5-year OS (over 50%) than those who did not (less than 30%). Segmentectomy (75.28%) and lobectomy (54.06%) showed better 5-year OS than other surgical methods (less than 50%). In multivariable analysis, young age, female, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index score, adenocarcinoma cell type, well differentiated, T1N2/T4N0 heterogenicity, treatment with operation, and segmentectomy/lobectomy/bilobectomy were significant factors. In conclusions, the heterogenicity of T1N2 had the best outcomes followed by T4N0. Patients received surgical treatment revealed much better outcomes than those did not. As always, multimodal therapies with individualized treatment tend to provide better survival outcomes.

Minimally invasive surgery vs. open thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer with N2 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery [MIS, including robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)] and open thoracotomy (OT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with N2 disease.

Methods

We searched online databases and studies from the creation of the database to August 2022, comparing the MIS group to the OT group for NSCLC with N2 disease. Study endpoints included intraoperative outcomes [e.g., conversion, estimated blood loss (EBL), surgery time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), and R0 resection], postoperative outcomes [e.g., length of stay (LOS) and complication], and survival outcomes [e.g., 30-day mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS)]. We estimated outcomes using random effects meta-analysis to account for studies with high heterogeneity (I² > 50 or p < 0.05). Otherwise, we used a fixed-effect model. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes and standard mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes. Treatment effects on OS and DFS were described by hazard ratio (HR).

Results

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies on MIS vs. OT for NSCLC with N2 disease included 8,374 patients. Compared to OT, patients that underwent MIS had less estimated blood loss (EBL) (SMD = - 64.82, p < 0.01), shorter length of stay (LOS) (SMD = -0.15, p < 0.01), higher R0 resection rate (OR = 1.22, p = 0.049), lower 30-day mortality (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03), and longer overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.61, P < 0.01). The results showed no statistically significant differences in surgical time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), complications, and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.

Conclusion

Current data suggest that minimally invasive surgery may provide satisfying outcomes, a higher R0 resection rate, and better short-term and long-term survival than open thoracotomy.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022355712.

What is the optimal management of potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC? Results of a fixed-effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling

Introduction

There is a critical need to understand the optimal treatment regimen in patients with potentially resectable stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials was carried out using a literature search including the CDSR, CENTRAL, DARE, HTA, EMBASE and MEDLINE bibliographic databases. Selected trials were used to perform a Bayesian fixed-effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling of treatment regimens relevant to current-day treatment options: chemotherapy plus surgery (CS), chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (CR) and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS).

Findings

Six trials were prioritised for evidence synthesis. The fixed-effects network meta-analyses demonstrated an improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) for CRS versus CS and CRS versus CR of 0.34 years (95% CI 0.02-0.65) and 0.32 years (95% CI 0.05-0.58) respectively, over a 5-year period. No evidence of effect was observed in overall survival although point estimates favoured CRS. The probabilities that CRS had a greater mean survival time and greater probability of being alive than the reference treatment of CR at 5 years were 89% and 86% respectively. Survival outcomes for CR and CS were essentially equivalent. The economic model calculated that CRS and CS had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £19 000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and £78 000/QALY compared to CR. The probability that CRS generated more QALYs than CR and CS was 94%.

Interpretation

CRS provides an extended time in a disease-free state leading to improved cost-effectiveness over CR and CS in potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC.

Effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Real-world data of a retrospective, dual-center study

Background

Studying the application of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) in the real world and evaluating its effectiveness and safety in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) are critically important.

Methods

This study included the II-IIIB stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving NCT with or without PD-1 inhibitors and undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant treatments between January 2019 to August 2022. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

Results

A total of 66 patients receiving NICT and 101 patients receiving NCT were included in this study. As compared to NCT, NICT showed similar safety while not increasing the surgical difficulty. The ORR in the NICT and NCT groups was 74.2% and 53.5%, respectively, P = 0.009. A total of 44 patients (66.7%) in the NICT group and 21 patients (20.8%) in the NCT group showed major pathology response (MPR) (P <0.001). The pathology complete response (pCR) rate was also significantly higher in NICT group than that in NCT group (45.5% vs. 10.9%, P <0.001). After Propensity Score Matching (PSM), 42 pairs of patients were included in the analysis. The results showed no significant difference in the ORR between the two groups (52.3% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.118), and the proportions of MPR (76.2%) and pCR (50.0%) in NICT group were significantly higher than those of MPR (11.9%) and pCR (4.7%) in the NCT group (P <0.001). The patients with driver mutations might also benefit from NICT.

Conclusions

As compared to NCT, the NICT could significantly increase the proportions of patients with pCR and MPR without increasing the operation-related bleeding and operation time.

[Postoperative radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIA - N2: Focus and perspectives]

Patients with resectable stage IIIA - N2 lung cancer represent a very heterogeneous population with variable risks of postoperative recurrence depending on the type of N2 involvement (unisite N2, multisite N2, bulky N2, extra-capsular rupture, incomplete resection…). This heterogeneity associated with the difficulty of carrying out prospective randomized studies with sufficient power in stages IIIA - 2, results in the absence of clear and consensual recommendations (except for stages IIIA - N2 resectable R0, since LungART and PORT-C studies). The objective of this article is to make an update on the place of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of stages IIIA - N2 following the publication of two recent randomized trials (PORT-C and LungART) but also compare them fort a better understanding of the current issues raised by these first published results. Indeed, these two trials do not find any benefit in terms of progression free survival and overall survival of postoperative radiotherapy but exploratory analyzes from these two studies seem to show a potential benefit of postoperative in some pN2 populations at high risk of locoregional recurrence (N2 multisite, N2 bulky…). In addition, the advent of immunotherapy (atezolizumab or pembrolizumab) and targeted therapies (osimertinib) in the adjuvant situation are redebating the place of a possible indication for postoperative radiotherapy in stage IIIA - 2.

Moving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors to Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Since prognosis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains dismal for common relapses after curative surgery, considerable efforts are currently focused on bringing immunotherapy into neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Previously, perioperative chemotherapy showed only a modest but significative improvement in overall survival. The presence of broad tumor neoantigens load at primary tumor prior to surgery as well as the known immunosuppressive status following resection represent the main rationale for immunotherapy in early disease. Several trials have been conducted in recent years, leading to atezolizumab and nivolumab approval in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting, respectively, and perioperative immunotherapy in NSCLC remains a field of active clinical and preclinical investigation. Unanswered questions in perioperative therapy in NSCLC include the optimal sequence and timing of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, the potential of combination strategies, the role of predictive biomarkers for patient selection and the choice of useful endpoints in clinical investigation.

Survival prediction by Bayesian network modeling for pseudomyxoma peritonei after cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To establish a survival prognostic model for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) based on Bayesian network (BN).

METHODS

453 PMP patients were included from the database at our center. The dataset was divided into a training set to establish BN model and a testing set to perform internal validation at a ratio of 8:2. From the training set, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for BN model construction. The confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the BN model.

RESULTS

The univariate and multivariate analyses identified 7 independent prognostic factors: gender, previous operation history, histological grading, lymphatic metastasis, peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction and splenectomy (all p < 0.05). Based on independent factors, the BN model of training set was established. After internal validation, the accuracy and AUC of the BN model were 70.3% and 73.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The BN model provides a reasonable level of predictive performance for PMP patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC.

Multimodality Treatment including Surgery Related to the Type of N2 Involvement in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Multimodality therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a complex and controversial issue, especially regarding optimal treatment regimens for patients with ipsilateral positive mediastinal nodes (N2 disease). Is the landscape in this hotly debated stage changing the role for surgery as immunotherapy and targeted therapies are being investigated and implemented? A review on multimodality therapeutic options for stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC is presented.

Abstract

For patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or positive N1 nodes, multimodality treatment is indicated. However, the optimal management of patients presenting with ipsilateral positive mediastinal nodes (N2 disease) has not been determined yet. Different treatment regimens consisting of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery have been proposed and implemented previously. In more recent years, immunotherapy and targeted therapies have been added as therapeutic options. The role of surgery is currently redefined. Recent studies have shown that surgical resection after induction immunotherapy or targeted therapy is feasible and yields good short-term results. In this review, we summarize the latest data on multimodality treatment options for stage IIIA-N2 locally advanced NSCLC, depending on the extent of nodal involvement.

Outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: an exploratory analysis from the PACIFIC trial

Background

The phase III PACIFIC trial (NCT02125461) established consolidation durvalumab as standard of care for patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no disease progression following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In some cases, patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC are considered operable, but the relative benefit of surgery is unclear. We report a post hoc, exploratory analysis of clinical outcomes in the PACIFIC trial, in patients with or without stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

Materials and methods

Patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no disease progression after ≥2 cycles of platinum-based, concurrent CRT were randomized 2 : 1 to receive durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously; once every 2 weeks for up to 12 months) or placebo, 1-42 days after CRT. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS; assessed by blinded independent central review according to RECIST version 1.1) and overall survival (OS). Treatment effects within subgroups were estimated by hazard ratios (HRs) from unstratified Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Of 713 randomized patients, 287 (40%) had stage IIIA-N2 disease. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. With a median follow-up of 14.5 months (range: 0.2-29.9 months), PFS was improved with durvalumab versus placebo in both patients with [HR = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.65] and without (HR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.80) stage IIIA-N2 disease. Similarly, with a median follow-up of 25.2 months (range: 0.2-43.1 months), OS was improved with durvalumab versus placebo in patients with (HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.39-0.79) or without (HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.57-1.06) stage IIIA-N2 disease. Durvalumab had a manageable safety profile irrespective of stage IIIA-N2 status.

Conclusions

Consistent with the intent-to-treat population, treatment benefits with durvalumab were confirmed in patients with stage IIIA-N2, unresectable NSCLC. Prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach for patients who are deemed operable.

•

The PACIFIC trial established durvalumab after CRT as standard of care for unresectable, stage III NSCLC.

•

The optimum multimodal treatment strategy for patients with potentially resectable, stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC is unknown.

•

Survival benefit with durvalumab was observed in patients with stage IIIA-N2, unresectable NSCLC in this post hoc analysis.

•

Durvalumab after CRT also exhibited a manageable safety profile in this subpopulation from PACIFIC.

•

Studies of surgical vs. non-surgical strategies are needed to establish the best approach for potentially operable patients.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy as a potential therapeutic option in NSCLC UICC stage IIIA with multilevel N2 disease

Lung Cancer is still one of the leading causes for cancer related death worldwide. The determination of an adequate therapeutic approach requests a precise staging, which contains computed tomography (CT) of the thorax, positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT), cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) and pulmonary function testing as well as the patient's opinion. In UICC stages I and II, if there is functional operability and technical resectability, the treatment of choice is primary surgery followed by adjuvant therapy depending on lymph node status, while patients in the metastatic stage IV, or with locally advanced, nonresectable disease are more likely to receive definitive chemoradiation therapy. The UICC Stage III (8th edition) combines a heterogeneous group of patients that remains the focus of discussion regarding the optimal therapeutic regimen, which ranges from primary surgical care to a neoadjuvant therapeutic approach, to definitive conservative treatment. Since March 2020, we have been treating a patient on an interdisciplinary basis who initially had a UICC stage IIIA multilevel N2 pulmonary adenocarcinoma and finally underwent successful surgery after a very good response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Our latest follow-up showed no evidence of recurrence. Similar to current ongoing studies our case shows, that neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a reasonable alternative to conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Management of Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on management of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary oncology, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts was convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 127 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address evaluation and staging workup of patients with suspected stage III NSCLC, surgical management, neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches, and management of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Salvage Surgery Compared to Surgery After Induction Chemoradiation Therapy for Advanced Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Salvage surgery is performed for selected patients with relapses of locally advanced lung cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT), and seems to be effective. To date, the feasibility of such salvage surgery, particularly anatomical pulmonary resection, has not been fully evaluated. To assess the feasibility of salvage surgery after definitive CRT, we compared clinical outcomes of surgery after definitive CRT to those of surgery after induction CRT.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent surgery from January 2000 to January 2018 were reviewed. We compared patients with salvage anatomical pulmonary resection after definitive CRT to patients with surgery after induction CRT in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients underwent salvage surgery after definitive CRT for locally advanced lung cancer (salvage group) and 36 underwent surgery after induction CRT for cN2-stage III non-small cell lung cancer (induction CRT group). The surgical procedures in the salvage group were 2 segmentectomies, 13 lobectomies, 1 bi-lobectomy and 7 pneumonectomies, and those in the induction CRT group were 34 lobectomies and 2 bi-lobectomies. There was no 30-day or 90-day mortality in either group. The 5-year overall survival was 44.7% for the salvage group and 58.6% for the induction CRT group. The 5-year progression-free interval was 42.2% for the salvage group and 47.7% for the induction CRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage anatomical pulmonary resection after definitive CRT for locally advanced lung cancer is feasible with acceptable morbidity and prognosis in highly selected patients.

Neoadjuvant osimertinib with/without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for EGFR-mutated resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: NeoADAURA

Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible oral EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor), that potently inhibits EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations and T790M resistance mutations together with efficacy in CNS metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we describe the rationale and design for the Phase III NeoADAURA study (NCT04351555), which will evaluate neoadjuvant osimertinib with or without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone prior to surgery, in patients with resectable stage II-IIIB N2 EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The primary end point is centrally assessed major pathological response at the time of resection. Secondary end points include event-free survival, pathological complete response, nodal downstaging at the time of surgery, disease-free survival, overall survival and health-related quality of life. Safety and tolerability will also be assessed. Trial Registration number: NCT04351555 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the survival outcomes of patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary surgery on survival outcomes for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using an approach based on a meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane library, and CNKI databases were systematically browsed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which met a set of predetermined inclusion criteria throughout January 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) were applied for the pooled overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) values, and the pooled survival rates at 1-year and 3-year were used as the relative risk (RR). All the pooled effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs contained a total of 4372 NSCLC at I-III stages was selected for final meta-analysis. We noted NACT was significantly associated with an improvement in OS (HR: 0.87; 95%CI: 0.81-0.94; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.86; 95%CI: 0.78-0.96; P = 0.005). Moreover, the survival rate at 1-year (RR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02-1.12; P = 0.007) and 3-year (RR: 1.16; 95%CI: 1.06-1.27; P = 0.001) in the NACT group was significantly higher than the survival rate for the primary surgery group. Finally, the treatment effects of NACT versus primary surgery on survival outcomes might be different when stratified by the mean age of patients and the tumor stages.

CONCLUSIONS

NACT could improve survival outcomes for patients with resectable NSCLC, suggesting its suitable future applicability for clinical practice. However, large-scale RCT should be conducted to assess the chemotherapy regimen on the prognosis of resectable NSCLC.

Upregulation of Long Non-Coding RNA GCC2-AS1 Facilitates Malignant Phenotypes and Correlated With Unfavorable Prognosis for Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background

The role played by long noncoding RNA GCC2-AS1 in primary malignant tumors remains poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the expression levels and evaluate the clinical significance and biological effects of GCC2-AS1 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

Methods

We used data obtained from tissue samples and the TCGA database to determine the levels of GCC2-AS1 expression LUAD patients, and the prognostic value of those levels. Functional experiments were performed to investigate the effect of GCC2-AS1 on LUAD cells. Genes that were differentially expressed in GCC2-AS1-low and -high groups were analyzed by an enrichment analysis. Additionally, a nomogram model was created and subgroup analyses were performed to further determine the prognostic value of GCC2-AS1 in LUAD.

Results

GCC2-AS1 expression was significantly upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma tissues as compared with normal tissues. Depletion of GCC2-AS1 inhibited the proliferation and invasion of LUAD cells in vitro. An elevated level of GCC2-AS1 was strongly correlated with shorter overall survival time and was identified as an independent prognostic marker for LUAD patients. Enrichment analyses conducted using GO, KEGG, and GSEA databases were performed to identify biological pathways that might involve GCC2-AS1. Several subgroups were found to have a significant prognostic value for patients in the GCC2-AS1-low and -high groups.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that GCC2-AS1 can serve as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for LUAD patients.

Thoracoscopic Vs Open Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Clinical N2 Lung Cancer

We evaluated the feasibility of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) following neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) for N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively reviewed patients with clinical N2 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection after nCCRT. The patients were matched using a propensity score based on age, sex, pulmonary function test, histologic type, clinical T factor, and method of N-staging. A total of 385 patients were enrolled between June 2012 and July 2017 (35 VATS, 350 open). After propensity matching (31 VATS, 112 open), the VATS group showed a significantly lower major complication rate (≥ grade II Clavien-Dindo classification; 9.7% vs 30.4%, P = 0.036). No significant differences were found between 2 group of 5-year survival rates (77.1% for the VATS group, 59.9% for the open group; P = 0.276) and recurrence-free survival rates (66.3% for the VATS group, 54.6% for the open group; P = 0.354). In multivariable analysis, VATS did not affect overall survival and recurrence-free survival. VATS was comparable to open thoracotomy in patients with clinical N2 NSCLC after nCCRT without compromising oncologic efficacy.

Neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 in EGFR-Mutant/ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

Defining the optimal neoadjuvant strategy in early-stage and locoregional (N2) oncogenic-driven lung cancer remains a major challenge for the scientific community. Whereas significant advances have been achieved with the use of personalized medicine and targeted therapies in advanced stages, we are still far from translating the same magnitude of benefits into an earlier-stage disease. Perioperative strategies with neoadjuvant and adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR and ALK gene alterations have yielded mixed results and further biomarker-driven trials are needed to shed more light on the significance of inhibiting the oncogenic signaling addiction at earlier stages of the disease and the conceivable value of incorporating more potent targeted inhibitors in this setting. Meanwhile, the landscape of early-stage lung cancer management is progressing rapidly, and we anticipate the incorporation of novel immunotherapeutic agents on the basis of this promising preliminary activity as induction strategies. Whether the benefits observed in the overall population can be translated into specific subsets of oncogenic-driven tumors is still unknown, but it clearly reinforces the importance of incorporating—sooner rather than later—a biomarker-testing strategy into the routine work-up of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are still many challenges to overcome such as the need to stablish standardized surrogate endpoints and to define the optimal duration of perioperative treatment, as well as how to expedite patient recruitment using enrichment strategies for biomarker stratified trials. Despite the difficulties, we are living in exciting times and coming up on a new window of opportunities for achieving the ultimate goal of curing early-stage lung cancer and improving long-term outcomes by eliminating the minimal residual disease and reducing the risk for metastatic recurrence.

SMAD-6, -7 and -9 are potential molecular biomarkers for the prognosis in human lung cancer

SMADs, a family of proteins that function as signal transducers and transcriptional regulators to regulate various signaling pathways, including the transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway, are similar to the mothers against decapentaplegic family of genes and the sma gene family in Caenorhabditis elegans. SMADs generate context-dependent modulation by interacting with various sequence-specific transcription factors, such as E2F4/5, c-Fos, GATA3, YY1 and SRF, which have been found to serve a key role in lung carcinoma oncogenesis and progression. However, the prognostic values of the eight SMADs in lung cancer have not been fully understood. In the present study, the expression levels and survival data of SMADs in patients with lung carcinoma from the Oncomine, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis, Kaplan-Meier plotter and cBioPortal databases were downloaded and analyzed. It was found that the mRNA expression levels of SMAD-6, -7 and -9 were decreased in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma compared with that in adjacent normal tissues, while there was no significant difference in SMADs 1-5. Survival analysis revealed that not only were low transcriptional levels of SMAD-6, -7 and -9 associated with low overall survival but they also had prognostic role for progression-free survival and post-progression survival (P<0.05) in patients with lung carcinoma. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that SMAD-6, -7 and -9 are potential biomarkers for the prognosis of patients with lung carcinoma.

How Effective Is Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Surgery for Pathologic Single-Station N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

The optimal treatment strategy for pathologic single-station N2 (pN2a1) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-surgery first followed by adjuvant treatment (SF) or neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (NS)-remains unclear. We compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after NS versus SF for pN2a1 NSCLC. We retrospectively identified patients with pN2a1 NSCLC resected between 2000 and 2018. Patients in the SF group had cN0 disease and were treated with surgery before adjuvant chemotherapy; patients in the NS group had known preoperative nodal disease, cN2 disease, and were treated with neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. The matching-weights procedure was applied to generate a cohort with similar characteristics between groups. DFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier approach and compared between groups using weighted log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models. We identified 227 patients with pN2a1 disease: 121 treated with SF and 106 with NS. After the matching-weights procedure, 5- and 10-year DFS were 45% and 27% for SF versus 26% and 21% for NS (log-rank P = 0.056; hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-2.65); 5- and 10-year OS were 49% and 30% for SF versus 43% and 20% for NS (log-rank P = 0.428; HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.67-2.28). SF and NS for pN2a1 NSCLC resulted in similar survival. A study comparing SF for known preresectional pN2a1 with occult pN2a1 disease could be a next step. Further investigation of SF for known N2a1 versus occult pN2a1 disease could power a clinical trial focused on N2a NSCLC.

Results of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in surgical resection of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese high-volume Center

PURPOSE

To investigate the short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for surgical treatment of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with open thoracotomy (OT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 1034 patients who underwent pulmonary resection and systemic lymph node dissection for pathological N2 NSCLC from September 2005 to December 2017 (536 patients in VATS group and 498 patients in OT group). Propensity score matching was applied to reduce the confounding effects. Factors affecting survival were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The VATS procedure was associated with shorter operative time compared with the OT procedure (147.96 ± 58.91 min vs. 165.34 ± 58.91 min, P < 0.001). No significant difference was identified between the two groups in the number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) and number of dissected MLNs stations. More patients after VATS procedure received postoperative adjuvant therapy (83.4% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.002). At a median follow-up of 36 (range 4-150) months, comparing VATS procedure and OT procedure, no significant differences were noted in 5-year DFS (20.7% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.89) and 5-year OS (30.7% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.821). The VATS procedure was not found to be an independent predictor of DFS (hazard ratio, 0.986; 95% CI, 0.809 to 1.202) or OS (hazard ratio, 0.977; 95% CI 0.802 to 1.191).

CONCLUSION

In this large propensity-matched comparison, the VATS procedure offered comparable short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy for patients with pN2 NSCLC when compared with OT procedure.

Prognostic Value of Tumor Size in Resected Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for lung cancer was introduced in 2017 and included major revisions, especially of stage III. For the subgroup stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgical resection remains controversial due to heterogeneous disease entity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of patients with completely resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. We retrospectively evaluated 77 consecutive patients with pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC (AJCC eighth edition) who underwent surgical resection with curative intent in China Medical University Hospital between 2006 and 2014. Survival analysis was conducted, using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed, using log-rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Of the 77 patients with pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC examined, 35 (45.5%) were diagnosed before surgery and 42 (54.5%) were diagnosed unexpectedly during surgery. The mean age of patients was 59 years, and the mean length of follow-up was 38.1 months. The overall one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 91.9%, 61.3%, and 33.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size <3 cm (hazards ratio (HR): 0.373, p = 0.003) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach (HR: 0.383, p = 0.014) were significant predictors for improved OS. For patients with surgically treated, pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, tumor size <3 cm and the VATS approach seemed to be associated with better prognosis.

An annual review of the remarkable advances in lung cancer clinical research in 2019

In recent years, lung cancer has become the most common cancer and the leading cause of deaths attributed to cancer. In China, lung cancer is the third leading cause of death after strokes and ischemic heart disease. This review aimed to provide an up-to-date summary of studies in regard to lung cancer in 2019 and to present the remarkable progress seen in lung cancer clinical research. A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science for research published in 2019 was conducted using the search terms "lung cancer", "early stage", "advanced", "diagnosis", "treatment", or any combination of these terms. We selected 56 studies that we considered to be significant and have presented their major findings. In summary, survival among lung cancer patients was significantly improved compared with historical controls, turning lung cancer from an incurable disease into a chronic disease. In addition, treating lung cancer has become increasingly comprehensive, diversified, and individualized. Exploring the accurate biomarkers in immunotherapy and the mechanism of drug resistance in targeted therapy constitutes the greatest challenge at this stage.

Locoregional Control, Overall Survival, and Disease-Free Survival in Stage IIIA (N2) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of Resected and Unresected Patients

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes concurrent definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) followed by durvalumab, thus challenging the role of surgery in resectable patients. We assessed locoregional disease control and survival in patients with surgically resected and unresected stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis from prospectively collected databases at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery or dCRT for clinical stage IIIA (N2) disease (2004-2014) were evaluated. Primary outcomes included locoregional disease control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier outcome analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 159 resected patients, the majority had lobectomy (82.4%), followed by pneumonectomy (11.9%) and sublobar resection (5.7%). The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0.6% and 1.3%, respectively. At median follow-up of 52.8 months, recurrence was 55.3%, with 44.0% having distant and 15.1% locoregional recurrence. At 5 years, OS was 50.8% and DFS was 33.1% Median OS was 61.2 months. A total of 366 patients underwent dCRT, with intensity-modulated radiation in 64.5%, proton therapy in 26.0%, and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in 9.6%. The mean dose was 68.1 Gy. At median follow-up of 20.8 months, recurrence was 53.6%, with distant and locoregional recurrence of 40.7% and 30.3%, respectively. At 5 years, OS was 29.2% and DFS was 20.5%. Median OS was 27.5 months.

CONCLUSION

Stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC continues to be a heterogeneous disease, and patients with surgically resected and unresected disease represent different risk populations. Ongoing immunotherapy trials may further redefine treatment algorithms in this complex patient population.

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus S-1 in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

About one-third of the lung tumors are staged as locally advanced at the time of initial diagnosis; however, the optimal induction treatment before curative resection has not been elucidated. To date, the evidence regarding the preoperative apatinib plus S-1 for locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma is scarce.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 29-year-old female was admitted because of persistent cough, sputum, and chest distress for 2 months.

DIAGNOSES

Primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma (cT3N2M0, IIIB) with unknown driver gene mutation status.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient had received 4 months of neoadjuvant therapy using oral apatinib (425 mg daily) plus S-1 (60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval), followed by anatomical lobectomy with curative intent. Adjuvant apatinib (425 mg daily for a month, and 250 mg daily for another month) plus S-1 at the same dosage were administered for 2 months. Thereafter, maintenance of low-dose S-1 monotherapy (40 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval) was continued for 6 months.

OUTCOMES

The adverse events were tolerable and well-controlled. A postoperative recurrence-free survival for 2 years and a half up to now was indicated.

LESSONS

Preoperative apatinib plus S-1 showed efficacy in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. However, high-quality trials are warranted before the recommendation of this therapeutic regimen.

Enhanced expression of circ_0000735 forecasts clinical severity in NSCLC and promotes cell progression via sponging miR-1179 and miR-1182

Although numerous dysregulated circular RNAs (circRNAs) was discovered, the study between circRNAs and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is just beginning. Here, we investigated the functions and provided a possible mechanism of circ_0000735 for NSCLC. Real-time PCR was used to elucidate the level of circ_0000735 in NSCLC tissue samples and cells. CCK8, colony formation, flow cytometric, and transwell experiments were carried out to evaluate cell proliferation, apoptosis, migratory and invasive abilities in NSCLC cell lines. Luciferase reporter assays were conducted to elucidate the mechanisms of circ_0000735 in NSCLC. Circ_0000735 was elevated in both NSCLC tissues and cells. This upregulation of circ_0000735 is associated with more advanced TNM stages and lymph node invasion. Gain and loss of function experiments documented that circ_0000735 significantly facilitated cell proliferation, migratory and invasive abilities and inhibit cell apoptosis. Moreover, we proved circ_0000735 could bound to miR-1179/1182 to exert its biological functions in NSCLC cells. Taken together, this work provided a possible treatment target for this devastating disease.