Shipping Lungs Greater Distances Increases Costs Without Cutting Waitlist Mortality

Bigger pies, bigger slices: Increased hospitalization costs for lung transplantation recipients in the non-donation service area allocation era

OBJECTIVE

On November 24, 2017, lung transplant allocation switched from donation service area to a 250-nautical mile radius policy to improve equity in access to lung transplantation. Given the growing consideration of healthcare costs, we evaluated changes in hospitalization costs after this policy change.

METHODS

Lung transplant hospitalizations were identified within the National Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2020. Recipients were categorized as donation service area era (August 2015 to October 2017) or non-donation service area era (December 2017 to February 2020). Median total hospitalization costs (inflation adjusted) were compared by era nationally and regionally. Multivariable generalized linear regression was performed to determine if the removal of the donation service area was associated with total hospitalization costs. The model was adjusted for recipient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, hospitalization region, transplant type (single, double), and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ex vivo lung perfusion, and mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

We analyzed 12,985 lung transplant recipients (median age of 61 years, 66% were male): 7070 in the donation service area era and 5915 in the non-donation service area era. Demographics were not different between recipients in both eras. Non-donation service area era recipients had greater extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, mechanical ventilation (<24 hours), and longer length of stay than donation service area era recipients. Median total hospitalization costs for non-donation service area versus donation service area era recipients increased by $24,198 ($157,964 vs $182,162, percentage change = 15.32%, P < .001). Median costs increased in East North Central ($42,281) and Mountain ($35,521) regions (both P < .01). After adjustment, median costs for non-donation service area versus donation service area era recipients still increased ($19,168, 95% CI, 145-38,191, P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization costs for lung transplant hospitalizations have increased from 2015 to 2020. The transition from donation service area-based allocation to the non-donation service area system may have contributed to this increase after 2017 by increasing access to transplant for sicker recipients.

Early national trends of lung allograft use during donation after circulatory death heart procurement in the United States

Objective

Innovative technology such as normothermic regional perfusion and the Organ Care System has expanded donation after circulatory death heart transplantation. We wanted to investigate the impact of donation after circulatory death heart procurement in concurrent lung donation and implantation at a national level.

Methods

We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing database for heart donation between December 2019 and March 2022. Donation after circulatory death donors were separated from donation after brain death donors and further categorized based on concomitant organ procurement of lung and heart, or heart only.

Results

A total of 8802 heart procurements consisted of 332 donation after circulatory death donors and 8470 donation after brain death donors. Concomitant lung procurement was lower among donation after circulatory death donors (19.3%) than in donation after brain death donors (38.0%, P < .001). The transplant rate of lungs in the setting of concomitant procurement is 13.6% in donation after circulatory death, whereas it is 38% in donation after brain death (P < .001). Of the 121 lungs from 64 donation after circulatory death donors, 22 lungs were retrieved but discarded (32.2%). Normothermic regional perfusion was performed in 37.3% of donation after circulatory death donors, and there was no difference in lung use between normothermic regional perfusion versus direct procurement and perfusion (20.2% and 18.8%). There was also no difference in 1-year survival between normothermic regional perfusion and direct procurement and perfusion.

Conclusions

Although national use of donation after circulatory death hearts has increased, donation after circulatory death lungs has remained at a steady state. The implantation of lungs after concurrent procurement with the heart remains low, whereas transplantation of donation after circulatory death hearts is greater than 90%. The use of normothermic regional perfusion lungs has been controversial, and we report comparable 1-year outcomes to standard donation after circulatory death lungs. Further studies are warranted to investigate the underlying mechanisms of normothermic regional perfusion on lung function.

A call to action in thoracic transplant surgical training

Thoracic organ recovery and implantation is increasing in complexity. Simultaneously the logistic burden and associated cost is rising. An electronic survey distributed to the surgical directors of thoracic transplant programs in the United States indicated dissatisfaction amongst 72% of respondents with current procurement training and 85% of respondents favored a process for certification in thoracic organ transplantation. These responses highlight concerns for the current paradigm of training in thoracic transplantation. We discuss the implications of advancements in organ retrieval and implant for surgical training and propose that the thoracic transplant community might address the need through formalized training in procurement and certification in thoracic transplantation.

Characteristics of donor lungs declined on site and impact of lung allocation policy change

OBJECTIVE

National and institutional data suggest an increase in organ discard rate (donor lungs procured but not implanted) after a new lung allocation policy was introduced in 2017. However, this measure does not include on-site decline rate (donor lungs declined intraoperatively). The objective of this study is to examine the impact of the allocation policy change on on-site decline.

METHODS

We used a Washington University (WU) and our local organ procurement organization (Mid-America Transplant [MTS]) database to abstract data on all accepted lung offers from 2014 to 2021. An on-site decline was defined as an event in which the procuring team declined the organs intraoperatively, and the lungs were not procured. Logistic regression models were used to investigate potentially modifiable reasons for decline.

RESULTS

The overall study cohort comprised 876 accepted lung offers, of which 471 donors were at MTS with WU or others as the accepting center and 405 at other organ procurement organizations with WU as the accepting center. At MTS, the on-site decline rate increased from 4.6% to 10.8% (P = .01) after the policy change. Given the greater likelihood of non-local organ placement and longer travel distance after policy change, the estimated cost of each on-site decline increased from $5727 to $9700. In the overall group, latest partial pressure of oxygen (odds ratio [OR], 0.993; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.989-0.997), chest trauma (OR, 2.474; CI, 1.018-6.010), chest radiograph abnormality (OR, 2.902; CI, 1.289-6.532), and bronchoscopy abnormality (OR, 3.654; CI, 1.813-7.365) were associated with on-site decline, although lung allocation policy era was unassociated (P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that nearly 8% of accepted lungs are declined on site. Several donor factors were associated with on-site decline, although lung allocation policy change did not have a consistent impact on on-site decline.