Increased risk of acute and chronic microvascular renal lesions associated with antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics in Lupus Nephritis vs. Non-Lupus Nephritis Patients-A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis Based on 921 Patients

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is an inflammation of the kidneys that is related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics between LN and non-LN SLE patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records collected from SLE patients treated at the University Hospital in Kraków, Poland, from 2012 to 2022. All patients met the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) criteria for SLE. Results: Among 921 SLE patients, LN was documented in 331 (35.94%). LN patients were younger at SLE diagnosis (29 vs. 37 years; p < 0.001) and had a male proportion that was 2.09 times higher than the non-LN group (16.62% vs. 7.97%; p < 0.001). They were more often diagnosed with serositis and hematological or neurological involvement (p < 0.001 for all). Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia occurred more frequently in these patients (p < 0.001 for both). LN patients exhibited a higher frequency of anti-dsDNA, anti-histone, and anti-nucleosome antibodies (p < 0.001 for all). Conversely, the non-LN group had a 1.24-fold (95% CI: 1.03-1.50; p = 0.021) increase in the odds ratio of having positive anti-cardiolipin IgM antibody results. LN patients were more frequently treated with immunosuppressants. The risk factors for experiencing at least three LN flares included female sex, younger age at the onset of LN or SLE, LN occurring later than SLE onset, the presence of anti-nucleosome or anti-dsDNA antibodies, and certain SLE manifestations such as myalgia, arthritis, proteinuria > 3.5 g/day, and pathological urinary casts in the urine sediment. Conclusions: LN patients differ from non-LN patients in the age of SLE diagnosis, treatment modalities, and autoantibody profile and have more frequent, severe manifestations of SLE. However, we still need more prospective studies to understand the diversity of LN and its progression in SLE patients.

[Lupus nephritis and thrombotic microangiopathy: A review]

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most common organ-specific manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Various clinical signs of LN develop in at least 50% of patients with SLE. In addition to LN, the spectrum of renal lesions associated with SLE also includes vascular pathology. One of the variants of renal microvascular injury is thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), the mechanisms of which are diverse. The review focuses on the main forms of TMA, including antiphospholipid syndrome and nephropathy associated with antiphospholipid syndrome, TMA caused by complement system regulation disorders and deficiency of ADAMTS13. In most cases, these forms of TMA are combined with LN. However, they may also exist as a single form of kidney damage. This article discusses the TMA pathogenesis, the impact on kidney prognosis, and treatment options.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review

Importance

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and immune-mediated injury to multiple organ systems, including the mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, hematologic, and kidney systems. Approximately 3.4 million people worldwide have received a diagnosis of SLE.

Observations

Approximately 90% of people with SLE are female. Although there are no uniformly accepted diagnostic criteria for SLE, the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (formerly the European League Against Rheumatism)/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria developed for scientific study are an estimated 96.1% sensitive and 93.4% specific for SLE. These classification criteria include both clinical factors, such as fever, cytopenia, rash, arthritis, and proteinuria, which may be indicative of lupus nephritis; and immunologic measures, such as SLE-specific autoantibodies and low complement levels. Approximately 40% of people with SLE develop lupus nephritis, and an estimated 10% of people with lupus nephritis develop end-stage kidney disease after 10 years. The primary goal of treatment is to achieve disease remission or quiescence, defined by minimal symptoms, low levels of autoimmune inflammatory markers, and minimal systemic glucocorticoid requirement while the patient is treated with maintenance doses of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive medications. Treatment goals include reducing disease exacerbations, hospitalizations, and organ damage due to the disease or treatment toxicity. Hydroxychloroquine is standard of care for SLE and has been associated with a significant reduction in mortality. Treatments in addition to hydroxychloroquine are individualized, with immunosuppressive agents, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide, typically used for treating moderate to severe disease. Three SLE medications were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration: belimumab (for active SLE in 2011 and for lupus nephritis in 2020), voclosporin (for lupus nephritis), and anifrolumab (for active SLE).

Conclusions and Relevance

Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with immune-mediated damage to multiple organs and increased mortality. Hydroxychloroquine is first-line therapy and reduces disease activity, morbidity, and mortality. When needed, additional immunosuppressive and biologic therapies include azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, belimumab, voclosporin, and anifrolumab.

Clinical presentation and outcomes in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome-associated adrenal hemorrhage. A multicenter cohort study and systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Adrenal hemorrhage (AH) can occur in patients with antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). We aimed to characterize the clinical manifestations, treatments, and outcomes of patients presenting with APS-associated AH (APS-AH) through a retrospective cohort and a systematic literature review (SLR).

METHODS

We performed a mixed-source approach combining a multicenter cohort with an SLR of patients with incident APS-AH. We included patients from Mayo Clinic and published cases with persistent positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies and presenting with AH, demonstrated by imaging or biopsy. We extracted demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, treatment strategies, and outcomes (primary adrenal insufficiency and mortality). We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox models for survival analysis.

RESULTS

We included 256 patients in total, 61 (24%) from Mayo Clinic and 195 (76%) from the SLR. The mean age was 46.8 (SD 15.2) years, and 45% were female. 69% of patients had bilateral adrenal involvement and 64% presented adrenal insufficiency. The most common symptoms at presentation were abdominal pain in 79%, and nausea and vomiting 46%. Hyponatremia (77%) was the most common electrolyte abnormality. Factors associated with primary adrenal insufficiency were bilateral adrenal involvement at initial imaging (OR 3.73, CI; 95%, 1.47-9.46) and anticardiolipin IgG positivity (OR 3.80, CI; 95%, 1.30-11.09). The survival rate at five years was 82%. History of stroke was associated with 3.6-fold increase in mortality (HR 3.62, 95% CI; 1.33-9.85).

CONCLUSION

AH is a severe manifestation of APS with increased mortality. Most patients developed permanent primary adrenal insufficiency, particularly those positive for anticardiolipin IgG and bilateral adrenal involvement.

Epidemiology of antiphospholipid syndrome: macro- and microvascular manifestations

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic and non-thrombotic macro- and microvascular manifestations and pregnancy complications in the setting of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), namely anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibodies and lupus anticoagulant. Four decades after its first description, APS prevalence and incidence are still not completely understood due to the limited number of well-designed, population-based multi-ethnic studies. Furthermore, despite decades of efforts to standardise aPL immunoassays, considerable intraassay and interlaboratory variances in aPL measures still exist. Large multicentre APS cohorts have shown a 10-year survival of ∼91% and the presence of catastrophic APS occurs in about 1% of the entire population, associated with a 50% mortality rate. Clinically, any organ can be affected in the context of large, medium or small vessel (artery and/or vein) thrombosis. Macrovascular thrombosis is the hallmark of the disease and veins are more frequently affected than arteries. Deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism thromboembolic disease is the most common APS manifestation, while stroke and transient ischaemic attack are the most frequent arterial thrombosis events. Myocardial infarction can also occur and contributes to increased mortality in APS. A minority of patients present with thrombosis affecting the intraabdominal organs, including the liver, spleen, small and large bowel, and the kidneys. Microvascular thrombosis, including APS nephropathy, chronic skin ulcers and livedoid vasculopathy represent a diagnostic challenge requiring histologic confirmation. In this narrative review we summarize the available evidence on APS epidemiology, focusing on the description of the prevalence of macro- and microvascular manifestations of the disease.

Efforts to Better Characterize "Antiphospholipid Antibody Nephropathy" for the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria: Renal Pathology Subcommittee Report

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) nephropathy (-N) can be challenging to recognize due to a lack of established classification or diagnostic criteria. As part of efforts to develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria (CC), the APS CC Renal Pathology Subcommittee aimed to better characterize the entity of aPL-N.

METHODS

We used a 4-pronged approach that included (1) administering Delphi surveys to worldwide APS physicians to generate aPL-N terminology; (2) conducting a literature review to demonstrate the association of nephropathy with aPL and identify published aPL-N histopathological terminology and descriptions; (3) evaluating aPL-N terminology used in renal biopsy reports from an international patient registry; and (4) evaluating proposed kidney pathologic features for aPL-N by assessment of international Renal Pathology Society (RPS) members.

RESULTS

After completing our metaanalysis demonstrating an association between nephropathy and aPL, we used Delphi surveys, a literature review, and international renal biopsy reports to develop a preliminary definition of aPL-N. The preliminary definition included include specific terms associated with acute (ie, thrombotic microangiopathy in glomeruli or arterioles/arteries) and chronic (ie, organized arterial or arteriolar microthrombi with or without recanalization, organized glomerular thrombi, fibrous and fibrocellular [arterial or arteriolar] occlusions, focal cortical atrophy with or without thyroidization, and fibrous intimal hyperplasia) lesions. Most RPS survey respondents agreed with this terminology and the importance of knowing aPL results for histopathological diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the inclusion of aPL-N in the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology APS CC, and provide the most widely accepted terminology to date for both acute and chronic pathologic lesions of aPL-N.

C/EBPβ isoform-specific regulation of podocyte pyroptosis in lupus nephritis-induced renal injury

As an essential factor in the prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lupus nephritis (LN) can accelerate the rate at which patients with SLE can transition to chronic kidney disease or even end-stage renal disease. Podocytes now appear to be a possible direct target in LN in addition to being prone to collateral damage from glomerular capillary lesions induces by immune complexes and inflammatory processes. The NLRP3 inflammasome is regulated by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ), which is involved in the pathogenesis of SLE. However, the role and mechanism of C/EBPβ in LN remain unclear. In this investigation, glomerular podocytes treated with LN serum and MRL/lpr mice were employed as in vivo and in vitro models of LN, respectively. In vivo, the expression of C/EBPβ isoforms was detected in kidney specimens of humans and mice with LN. Then we assessed the effect of C/EBPβ inhibition on renal structure and function by injecting RNAi adeno-associated virus of C/EBPβ shRNA into MRL/lpr mice. In vitro, glomerular podocytes were treated with LN serum and C/EBPβ siRNA to explore the role of C/EBPβ in the activation of the AIM2 inflammasome and podocyte injury. C/EBPβ-LAP and C/EBPβ-LIP were significantly overexpressed in kidney tissue samples from LN patients and mice, and C/EBPβ inhibition significantly alleviated renal function damage and ameliorated renal structural deficiencies. Inflammatory pathways downstream from the AIM2 inflammasome could be suppressed by C/EBPβ knockdown. Furthermore, the upregulation of C/EBPβ-LAP could activate the AIM2 inflammasome and podocyte pyroptosis by binding to the promoters of AIM2 and CASPASE1 to enhance their expression, and the knockdown of AIM2 or (and) caspase-1 reversed the effects of C/EBPβ-LAP overexpression. Interestingly, C/EBPβ-LIP overexpression could transcriptionally inhibit IRAG and promote Ca2+ release-mediated activation of the AIM2 inflammasome. This finding suggests that C/EBPβ is not only involved in the regulation of the expression of key proteins of the AIM2 inflammasome but also affects the polymerization of key proteins of the AIM2 inflammasome through the regulation of Ca2+ release. In conclusion, this study provides a new idea for studying the regulatory mechanism of C/EBPβ and provides a theoretical basis for the early diagnosis and treatment of LN in the future. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Anti-phospholipid autoantibodies in human diseases

Anti-phospholipid autoantibodies are a group of antibodies that can specifically bind to anionic phospholipids and phospholipid protein complexes. Recent studies have reported elevated serum anti-phospholipid autoantibody levels in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic disorders, malaria, SARS-CoV-2 infection, obstetric diseases and cardiovascular diseases. However, the underlying mechanisms of anti-phospholipid autoantibodies in disease pathogenesis remain largely unclear. Emerging evidence indicate that anti-phospholipid autoantibodies modulate NETs formation, monocyte activation, blockade of apoptotic cell phagocytosis in macrophages, complement activation, dendritic cell activation and vascular endothelial cell activation. Herein, we provide an update on recent advances in elucidating the effector mechanisms of anti-phospholipid autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of various diseases, which may facilitate the development of potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of anti-phospholipid autoantibody-related disorders.

The 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria

OBJECTIVE

To develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and trials, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR.

METHODS

This international multidisciplinary initiative included 4 phases: 1) Phase I, criteria generation by surveys and literature review; 2) Phase II, criteria reduction by modified Delphi and nominal group technique exercises; 3) Phase III, criteria definition, further reduction with the guidance of real-world patient scenarios, and weighting via consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis, and threshold identification; and 4) Phase IV, validation using independent adjudicators' consensus as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria include an entry criterion of at least one positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test within 3 years of identification of an aPL-associated clinical criterion, followed by additive weighted criteria (score range 1-7 points each) clustered into 6 clinical domains (macrovascular venous thromboembolism, macrovascular arterial thrombosis, microvascular, obstetric, cardiac valve, and hematologic) and 2 laboratory domains (lupus anticoagulant functional coagulation assays, and solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for IgG/IgM anticardiolipin and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2 -glycoprotein I antibodies). Patients accumulating at least 3 points each from the clinical and laboratory domains are classified as having APS. In the validation cohort, the new APS criteria versus the 2006 revised Sapporo classification criteria had a specificity of 99% versus 86%, and a sensitivity of 84% versus 99%.

CONCLUSION

These new ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary international input. Hierarchically clustered, weighted, and risk-stratified criteria reflect the current thinking about APS, providing high specificity and a strong foundation for future APS research.

2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria

OBJECTIVE

To develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and trials, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR.

METHODS

This international multidisciplinary initiative included four phases: (1) Phase I, criteria generation by surveys and literature review; (2) Phase II, criteria reduction by modified Delphi and nominal group technique exercises; (3) Phase III, criteria definition, further reduction with the guidance of real-world patient scenarios, and weighting via consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis, and threshold identification; and (4) Phase IV, validation using independent adjudicators' consensus as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria include an entry criterion of at least one positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test within 3 years of identification of an aPL-associated clinical criterion, followed by additive weighted criteria (score range 1-7 points each) clustered into six clinical domains (macrovascular venous thromboembolism, macrovascular arterial thrombosis, microvascular, obstetric, cardiac valve, and hematologic) and two laboratory domains (lupus anticoagulant functional coagulation assays, and solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for IgG/IgM anticardiolipin and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies). Patients accumulating at least three points each from the clinical and laboratory domains are classified as having APS. In the validation cohort, the new APS criteria vs the 2006 revised Sapporo classification criteria had a specificity of 99% vs 86%, and a sensitivity of 84% vs 99%.

CONCLUSION

These new ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary international input. Hierarchically clustered, weighted, and risk-stratified criteria reflect the current thinking about APS, providing high specificity and a strong foundation for future APS research.

Antiphospholipid syndrome nephropathy: Current knowledge and unanswered questions

The definition of acute and chronic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) nephropathy was recently updated using a multiphase methodology in the context of the development of the new APS classification criteria. Currently, there is no consensus for the treatment of APS nephropathy, which mainly relies on the general recommendations for the management of APS. Based on evidence from experimental studies and a few clinical studies and case series, targeted treatments such as B-cell depletion, anti-B-cell activating factor antibody, complement inhibition, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, and neutrophil extracellular traps or interferon targeting may show promise for the treatment of microvascular manifestations in APS, including APS nephropathy. Validation of the new APS nephropathy definition and/or efforts for improvement in proposed terminology, along with the assessment of the safety and efficacy of potential targeted treatments in randomized controlled trials, are major future research directions. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of APS nephropathy and discuss unanswered questions.

Lupus Nephritis Risk Factors and Biomarkers: An Update

Lupus nephritis (LN) represents the most severe organ manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in terms of morbidity and mortality. To reduce these risks, tremendous efforts have been made in the last decade to characterize the different steps of the disease and to develop biomarkers in order to better (i) unravel the pre-SLE stage (e.g., anti-nuclear antibodies and interferon signature); (ii) more timely initiation of therapy by improving early and accurate LN diagnosis (e.g., pathologic classification was revised); (iii) monitor disease activity and therapeutic response (e.g., recommendation to re-biopsy, new urinary biomarkers); (iv) prevent disease flares (e.g., serologic and urinary biomarkers); (v) mitigate the deterioration in the renal function; and (vi) reduce side effects with new therapeutic guidelines and novel therapies. However, progress is poor in terms of improvement with early death attributed to active SLE or infections, while later deaths are related to the chronicity of the disease and the use of toxic therapies. Consequently, an individualized treat-to-target strategy is mandatory, and for that, there is an unmet need to develop a set of accurate biomarkers to be used as the standard of care and adapted to each stage of the disease.