Outcome of Infrainguinal Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein Bypass for Critical Limb Ischemia is Superior to Alternative Autologous Vein Bypass, Especially in Patients With High Operative Risk

Emergency autologous vein graft reconstruction after vascular closure device usage and subsequent infection

Different techniques and devices can achieve haemostasis after endovascular procedures to reduce time to haemostasis and facilitate percutaneous large-bore access. One such device is the Angio-Seal, which accomplishes haemostasis by compressing a collagen plug against the arteriotomy. Multiple complications related to Angio-Seal exist, most commonly acute artery occlusions and rarely infections and endarteritis. We present a case of an adult male (aged 80-85) who developed a groin haematoma associated with Angio-Seal use. Arterial bypass for arterial reconstruction and intravenous antibiotics were required. This case addresses the associated pathologies of Angio-Seal failure and Angio-Seal infection, patient- and device-specific risk factors and measures to treat and prevent these complications (ANGIO-SEAL VIP Vascular Closure Device-6 Fr Terumo Medical, NJ, USA).

Alternative Conduits for Lower Extremity Bypass

While single-segment great saphenous vein (GSV) remains the gold-standard conduit for infrainguinal bypass, several alternative options are available for use when GSV is absent in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia requiring infrainguinal revascularization including alternative autologous vein, prosthetic conduits, and cryopreserved vein grafts.

Principles and Practice in Pediatric Vascular Trauma: Part 2: Fundamental Vascular Principles, Pediatric Nuance, and Follow-up Strategies

As of 2020, penetrating injuries became the leading cause of death among children and adolescents ages 1-19 in the United States. For those patients who survive and receive advanced medical care, vascular injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and trigger notable trauma team angst. Moreover, penetrating injuries can lead to life-threatening hemorrhage and/or limb-threatening ischemia if not addressed promptly. Vascular injury management demands timely and unique expertise, particularly for pediatric patients. In part 1 of this review, we discussed the scope and extent of the epidemic of traumatic vascular injuries in pediatric patients, reviewed current evidence and outcomes, discussed various challenges and advantages of a myriad of existing team structures, and outlined potential outcome targets and solutions. However, in order to optimize care for pediatric vascular trauma, we must also understand the fundamental best practice principles, surgical options and approaches, medical management, and recommendations for ongoing, outpatient follow-up. In part 2, we will address the best evidence, combined with expert consensus, regarding strategies for diagnosing, managing, and ongoing follow-up of vascular trauma, with particular focus on the nuances that define the unique approaches to pediatric patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: n/a.

Importance of Flow Waveform and Flow Volume as Prognostic Indicators for the Patency of Infra-Inguinal Autologous Vein Bypass

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of the intra-operative flow waveform and the flow volume with graft prognosis of the infra-inguinal vein bypass.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of intra-operative flowmetry performed for infra-inguinal autologous vein bypass between 2011 and 2020. Flow waveforms were classified as type 0 - IV according to the Kyushu University (KU) classification. The patients (n = 340) were divided into three groups based on the flow waveform predicting the graft patency: type 0/I (long patency), type II (no early occlusion but late occlusion possible), and type III/IV (early occlusion). The graft occlusion rates of popliteal artery bypass (PAB) and infrapopliteal artery bypass (IPAB) within 30 days of surgery were compared between type 0/I + II and type III/IV groups, while the midterm graft patency rates were compared between type 0/I and type II groups. Additionally, a multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for early and late graft occlusion.

RESULTS

The early graft occlusion rates of type 0/I + II and type III/IV groups were 3.9% and 0%, respectively, (p = 1.0) for PAB, and 5.3% and 46.2%, respectively, (p < .001) for IPAB. The two year primary patency rates of type 0/I and type II groups were 91% and 75%, respectively, (p = .030) for PAB, and 58% and 63%, respectively, (p = .72) for IPAB. Independent risk factors for early occlusion were none in PAB and flow waveform (type IV) in IPAB. Independent risk factors for patency loss in PAB were flow waveform (type II), end stage renal disease, and dual antiplatelet use, and those in IPAB were older age, women, lower flow volume, and iterative bypass.

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative flowmetry is useful for predicting the graft prognosis in infra-inguinal vein bypass and this is dependent on the distal target artery.

Alternative autologous and biologic conduits have worse outcomes than prosthetic grafts for infrainguinal bypass in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Single segment great saphenous vein (GSV) is the preferred conduit in infrainguinal bypass. Alternative autologous conduits (AAC) and nonautologous biologic conduits (NABC) are thought to be a better alternative to traditional prosthetic conduits (PC) in the absence of GSV. In this study we analyzed the outcomes of these alternative conduits in lower extremity bypasses (LEB) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative LEB database from 2003 to 2020 was queried for this study, to identify LEB in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Primary outcomes were graft patency, major adverse limb events (MALE), and MALE-free survival at 1 year. Standard statistical methods were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 22,671 LEB procedures (12,810 GSV, 6002 PC, 1907 AAC, and 1952 NABC). Compared with the GSV group, the other conduit patients were significantly older, had more comorbidities, had an increased rate of prior lower extremity interventions, had a higher rate of infrageniculate bypass targets, and were less ambulatory at baseline. The PC, AAC, and NABC groups had significantly higher rates of postoperative morbidity compared with the GSV group. The PC group had a higher 30-day mortality compared with the GSV, AAC, and NABC groups (3% PC vs 2% GSV, 2% AAC, 2% NABC; P = .049). Both PC and NABC had higher 1-year mortality compared with GSV and AAC (13% PC and 13% NABC vs 10% GSV, 10% AAC; P = .02). In an adjusted Cox regression model (stratified by infrageniculate target and adjusted for age, comorbidities, and prior vascular interventions) PC was not significantly different from GSV, but AAC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.67; P < .001) and NABC (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.61-2.25; P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of loss of primary patency. A similar association with MALE was observed: both AAC (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.15-1.58; P < .001) and NABC (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.53-2.11; P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of MALE compared with GSV; PC was not significantly different from GSV.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of GSV, alternative conduits (autologous or nonautologous biologic) do not confer a benefit with regard to graft patency or MALE compared with PCs. Increased operating time or costs associated with the use of these conduits is not justified based on this study.

The Impact of Diabetes on Vascular Disease: Progress from the Perspective of Epidemics and Treatments

At present, the global incidence of diabetes has increased in countries with large populations, and the changes in developing regions are particularly worthy of attention. In the past 40 years or so, the income situation in China, India, and other countries has exploded, leading to changes in the way of life and work as well as an increase in the prevalence of diabetes. Metabolic disorders caused by diabetes can lead to secondary vascular complications, which have long-term malignant effects on the heart, kidneys, brain, and other vital organs of patients. Adequate primary prevention measures are needed to reduce the incidence of diabetic vascular complications, and more attention should be given to treatment after the disease. To this end, it is necessary to determine a standardized drug and physical therapy system and to build a more efficient and low-cost chronic disease management system.

Prognostic Significance of Intraoperative Graft Flow in Distal Bypass on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic significance of measurement of graft flow on the patency of distal bypass.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for 208 distal bypasses (208 limbs, 170 patients) with a single segment great saphenous vein conducted in a nonreversed manner from January 2009 to December 2019 in Japan. Patient backgrounds, operative details (including intraoperative mean graft flow), hospital outcomes, and long-term outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoints were the primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency of the distal bypass graft and the secondary endpoints were limb salvage and wound healing.

RESULTS

The median intraoperative graft flow was 18 [10-30] mL/min. The follow-up rate was 98% in a mean follow-up period of 31 ± 26 months. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency in the cohort were 51%, 72%, and 73% at 1 year, and 39%, 59%, and 61% at 3 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for primary patency were low graft flow (P = 0.0022) and female sex (P = 0.0016), and those for secondary patency were also low graft flow (P = 0.0025) and female sex (P < .001). The cut-offs for graft flow predicting primary and secondary patency were both 16 mL/min. The limb salvage rate was 94% at 1 year and 89% at 3 years; and the wound healing rates were 55%, 71% and 84% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Limb salvage and wound healing were not significantly associated with intraoperative graft flow.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative graft flow was an independent predictor for graft patency in distal bypass, but had no influence on limb salvage and wound healing. The cut-off value for the mean graft flow predicting primary and secondary patency was 16 mL/min.

Diabetes mellitus was not associated with lower amputation-free survival after open revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia - A nationwide propensity score adjusted analysis

The risk of major amputation is higher after urgently planned endovascular therapy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this nationwide cohort study was to compare outcomes between patients with and without DM following urgently planned open revascularization for CLTI from 2010 to 2014. Out of 1537 individuals registered in the Swedish Vascular Registry, 569 were registered in the National Diabetes Register. A propensity score adjusted Cox regression analysis was conducted to compare outcome between the groups with and without DM. Median follow-up was 4.3 years and 4.5 years for patients with and without DM, respectively. Patients with DM more often had foot ulcers (p = 0.034) and had undergone more previous amputations (p = 0.001) at baseline. No differences in mortality, cardiovascular death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), or major amputation were observed between groups. The incidence rate of stroke was 70% higher (95% CI: 1.11–2.59; p = 0.0137) and the incidence rate of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) 39% higher (95% CI: 1.00–1.92; p = 0.0472) among patients with DM in comparison to those without. Open vascular surgery remains a first-line option for a substantial number of patients with CLTI, especially for limb salvage in patients with DM. The higher incidence rates of stroke and AMI among patients with DM following open vascular surgery for infrainguinal CLTI require specific consideration preoperatively with the aim of optimizing medical treatment to improve cardiovascular outcome postoperatively.

Systems Approach to Discovery of Therapeutic Targets for Vein Graft Disease: PPARα Pivotally Regulates Metabolism, Activation, and Heterogeneity of Macrophages and Lesion Development

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Vein graft failure remains a common clinical challenge. We applied a systems approach in mouse experiments to discover therapeutic targets for vein graft failure.

Review: Tissue Engineering of Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts and Their In Vivo Evaluation in Large Animals and Humans

To date, a wide range of materials, from synthetic to natural or a mixture of these, has been explored, modified, and examined as small-diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts (SD-TEVGs) for tissue regeneration either in vitro or in vivo. However, very limited success has been achieved due to mechanical failure, thrombogenicity or intimal hyperplasia, and improvements of the SD-TEVG design are thus required. Here, in vivo studies investigating novel and relative long (10 times of the inner diameter) SD-TEVGs in large animal models and humans are identified and discussed, with emphasis on graft outcome based on model- and graft-related conditions. Only a few types of synthetic polymer-based SD-TEVGs have been evaluated in large-animal models and reflect limited success. However, some polymers, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), show favorable biocompatibility and potential to be further modified and improved in the form of hybrid grafts. Natural polymer- and cell-secreted extracellular matrix (ECM)-based SD-TEVGs tested in large animals still fail due to a weak strength or thrombogenicity. Similarly, native ECM-based SD-TEVGs and in-vitro-developed hybrid SD-TEVGs that contain xenogeneic molecules or matrix seem related to a harmful graft outcome. In contrast, allogeneic native ECM-based SD-TEVGs, in-vitro-developed hybrid SD-TEVGs with allogeneic banked human cells or isolated autologous stem cells, and in-body tissue architecture (IBTA)-based SD-TEVGs seem to be promising for the future, since they are suitable in dimension, mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and availability.

The Upper-Arm Basilic-Cephalic Loop: A Valueable Alternative for Below-Knee Arterial Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances of endovascular interventions, bypass surgery remains the gold standard for treatment of long and complex arterial occlusions in the lower limb. Autologous vein is regarded superior to other options. As the graft of first choice, the great saphenous vein (GSV) is often not available due to previous bypass, stripping or poor quality. Other options like arm veins (AV) are important alternatives. As forearm portions of AVs are often unusable, a graft created from the upper arm basilic and cephalic veins provides a valuable alternative.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral center between 01/1998 and 07/2018 using arm veins as the main peripheral bypass graft. Study endpoints were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage and survival.

RESULTS

In the observed time period 2702 bypass procedures were performed at our institution for below-knee arterial reconstructions. Vein grafts used included the ipsilateral GSV (iGSV; n = 1937/71.7%), contralateral GSV (cGSV; 192/7.1%), small saphenous vein (SSV; 133/4.9%), prosthetic conduits (61/2.3%) and different configurations of AV (379/14%). In the majority of patients receiving AV grafts a complete continuous cephalic or basilic vein (CAV) was used (n = 292/77%). If it was not possible to use major parts of these 2 veins, either spliced arm vein grafts (SAV) (42/11%) or an upper arm basilic-cephalic loop graft (45/12%) were used. Median follow-up was 27 (interquartile range: 8-50) months. After 3 years secondary patency (CAV: 85%; SAV: 62%; loop: 66%; p = 0.125) and limb salvage rates (CAV: 79%, SAV: 68%; loop: 79%; p = 0.346) were similar between the 3 bypass options.

CONCLUSION

The encouraging results of alternative AV configurations highlight their value in case the basilic or cephalic veins are not useable in continuity. Especially for infragenual redo-bypass procedures, these techniques should be considered to offer patients durable revascularization options.

[Results of loop endarterectomy and femoropopliteal bypass grafting in TASC C and D lesions]

AIM

The aim of our investigation was to analyse the results of treatment of patients with atherosclerotic lesions of the femoropopliteal segment by means of femoropopliteal bypass grafting or loop endarterectomy within the framework of a single-centre retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included a total of 177 patients who were divided into two groups. Group One was composed of 108 patients subjected to loop endarterectomy from the arteries of the femoropopliteal segment, and Group Two comprised 69 patients who endured femoropopliteal bypass surgery using a synthetic graft.

RESULTS

Thoroughly analysed were the clinical, demographic, anatomical and perioperative data, as well as intra- and perioperative complications, followed by assessment of primary and secondary patency, with no statistically significant differences in these parameters revealed. Secondary patency was somewhat better in the group of loop endarterectomy. Also determined and examined were specific complications such as insufficient extraction of the plaque, perforation of the artery with the loop, thinning of the wall, detachment of the calcified plaque. This is followed by discussing variants of correction of similar events. In the group of loop endarterectomy, there were no severe complications, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation in the early postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Loop endarterectomy is an acceptable alternative to femoropopliteal bypass grafting with a synthetic prosthesis. Taking into account all specific complications, it is possible to achieve minimization of unsuccessful outcomes.

Optical Coherence Tomography Contribution Assessment in the Revascularization of Long Femoropopliteal Occlusive Lesions (TASC C and D): A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment has become the first-line revascularization technique for femoropopliteal lesions. This technique lacks reliable and accurate morphological control of the arterial segment treated. Intraoperative 2-dimensional angiogram consumes iodinated contrast media and increases X-ray exposure; this subsequently provides no 3-dimensional information on the quality of the revascularization completed, what could explain some of the early and late failures of the technique. We evaluated whether intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) control in addition to standard angiogram could improve the primary patency rate at 12 months in comparison to standard angiogram alone in patients with occlusive femoropopliteal lesions.

METHODS

The tomography by optical coherence in femoral artery trial is a multicentric, prospective, randomized, controlled, and single-blind study including patients with long de novo occlusive femoropopliteal lesions. The randomization will be achieved in 2 balanced groups of patients after crossing successfully the lesion: group 1 with intraoperative OCT control in addition to standard angiogram and group 2 with standard angiogram alone. The randomization will be stratified by center. The protocol has been submitted and approved by a French ethic's committee under reference number CPP2019-12-098. The study has been registered under the reference number NCT04434586 on the Web site of clinicaltrials.gov.

RESULTS

The primary outcome of the study is the primary patency at 12 months. The number of patients who need to be treated is 166 (83 in each group) considering 5% of no workable data. Symptoms' improvement, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, quality-of-life questionnaires, cost utility, and cost effectiveness will be analyzed as secondary end-point variables at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is to evaluate the potential benefit for patients on the result of endovascular revascularization of long occlusive femoropopliteal lesion at 12 months when using intraoperative OCT control.

Arm Vein versus Small Saphenous Vein for Lower Extremity Bypass in the Absence of Both Great Saphenous Veins

BACKGROUND

Bypass surgery remains the gold standard for long and complex arterial occlusions in the lower limb. The vein is regarded superior to prosthetic conduits in peripheral arterial bypass surgery. However, this option is often limited because of previous bypass, stripping, or poor quality of the ipsilateral and/or contralateral great saphenous vein (GSV). Under these circumstances, the arm vein (AV) and small saphenous vein (SSV) are the only alternative autologous vein grafts.

METHODS

We analyzed all consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral center between January 1998 and July 2018 using either the AV or SSV as the main peripheral bypass graft. Study end points were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival.

RESULTS

In total, 416 bypass procedures using exclusively AV (n = 327) or SSV (n = 89) were performed. There was a predominance of male gender. The majority of risk factors were evenly distributed between groups. The mean follow-up period was 2.3 years (0.9 to 13.3 years). Five-year primary and secondary patency rates were 39% (95% CI: 31-47%) and 67% (59-75%) for AV and 53% (41-66%) and 76% (67-86%) for SSV, respectively (P = 0.2 and 0.25). The five-year limb salvage and survival rates were 71% (68-81%) and 84% (77-90%) for AV and 78% (67-88%) and 90% (82-98%) for SSV, respectively (P = 0.52 and 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Both AV and SSV are equally effective alternatives for peripheral bypass if no GSV is available. Although there was a trend toward better results with the SSV, there was no significant difference between the 2 options.

Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative based on patch type

OBJECTIVE

The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) is the largest registry of vascular surgical procedures and as such is capable of distinguishing small but important differences in outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) based on patch type, including bovine pericardium, autogenous vein, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and Dacron.

METHODS

All primary CEAs performed with primary repair and patching (n = 70,987) within the VQI were retrospectively analyzed. Reoperative CEA and combined CEA and coronary artery bypass were excluded. Rates of any postoperative neurologic event, return to the operating room (bleeding, neurologic event, or wound complication), and restenosis (>50% and >80%) at 1-year follow-up were primary outcomes. Rates were compared by patch type using χ² and Bonferroni analysis. Multivariate hierarchical logistic regression models were used to predict end points of postoperative neurologic event, return to the operating room, and 1-year restenosis.

RESULTS

During the period of study, 2003 to 2017, there were 70,987 CEAs entered into the VQI registry. Bovine pericardium was the patch material with the highest frequency of use (n = 51,480), followed by Dacron (n = 12,356), vein (n = 1460), and PTFE (n = 1638). Bovine pericardium, vein, and Dacron had lower rates of postoperative neurologic events compared with PTFE or primary repair. Bovine pericardium had the lowest rate of restenosis at 1 year. By multivariate analysis, bovine pericardium (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.89) and protamine use (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.91) were associated with a lower incidence of return to the operating room. The use of Dacron, vein, and PTFE patches was not significantly different from the reference of primary closure. Multivariate analysis of postoperative neurologic events revealed that bovine pericardium (OR, 0.59; CI, 0.48-0.72) and Dacron (OR, 0.56; CI, 0.43-0.72) were associated with lower incidence of stroke or transient ischemic attack, whereas vein and PTFE were no different from primary closure. Bovine pericardium (OR, 0.57; CI, 0.44-0.75), Dacron (OR, 0.70; CI, 0.50-0.98), vein (OR, 0.72; CI, 0.53-0.98), and never smoking (OR, 0.87; CI, 0.78-0.96) were associated with a lower incidence of restenosis at 1 year by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Bovine pericardium has superior outcomes both postoperatively and at 1 year compared with other patch materials. The large volume of patient data contained in the VQI makes it possible to compare outcomes that have small but meaningful differences.

Autologous alternative veins may not provide better outcomes than prosthetic conduits for below-knee bypass when great saphenous vein is unavailable

BACKGROUND

There is a need to better define the role of alternative autologous vein (AAV) segments over contemporary prosthetic conduits in patients with critical limb ischemia when great saphenous vein (GSV) is not available for use as the bypass conduit.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent bypass to infrageniculate targets between 2007 and 2011 were categorized in three groups: GSV, AAV, and prosthetic. The primary outcome was graft patency. The secondary outcome was limb salvage. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust for baseline confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 407 infrainguinal bypasses to below-knee targets were analyzed; 255 patients (63%) received a single-segment GSV, 106 patients (26%) received an AAV, and 46 patients (11%) received a prosthetic conduit. Baseline characteristics were similar among groups, with the exception of popliteal targets and anticoagulation use being more frequent in the prosthetic group. Primary patency at 2 and 5 years was estimated at 47% and 32%, respectively, for the GSV group; 24% and 23% for the AAV group; and 43% and 38% for the prosthetic group. Primary assisted patency at 2 and 5 years was estimated at 71% and 55%, respectively, for the GSV group; 53% and 51% for the AAV group; and 45% and 40% for the prosthetic group. Secondary patency at 2 and 5 years was estimated at 75% and 60%, respectively, for the GSV group; 57% and 55% for the AAV group; and 46% and 41% for the prosthetic group. In Cox analysis, primary patency (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.404-0.758), primary assisted patency (HR, 0.57; P = .004; 95% CI, 0.388-0.831), and secondary patency (HR, 0.56; P = .005; 95% CI, 0.372-0.840) were predicted by GSV compared with AAV, but there was no difference between AAV and prosthetic grafts except for the primary patency, for which prosthetic was protective (HR, 0.38; P < .001; 95% CI, 0.224-0.629). Limb salvage was similar among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

AAV conduits may not offer a significant patency advantage in midterm follow-up over prosthetic bypasses.

Use of completion imaging during infrainguinal bypass in the Vascular Quality Initiative

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the practice patterns of intraoperative completion imaging (CI) for lower extremity bypass (LEB) in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all LEB procedures in the VQI database from January 2003 to October 2013 was performed. Regions with fewer than 200 LEB procedures were excluded from the regional analysis. The modality of CI was defined as duplex ultrasound, angiography, or both.

RESULTS

A total of 14,140 LEBs were captured, with the rate of CI being 43%. After exclusion of three regions for insufficient volume (<200 LEBs), 13,945 LEB operations across 13 regions were available for regional analysis. Use of any type of intraoperative CI varied across regions from a low of 8% to a high of 70%, with angiography being performed most frequently. When CI was performed, the type of imaging modality varied between regions from a high of 99% for angiography to a high of 75% for duplex ultrasound. CI was more common in male patients (44% of male patients vs 42% of female patients; P = .032), diabetics (44% of diabetic patients vs 42% of nondiabetic patients; P = .026), and patients with coronary artery disease (45% of patients with coronary artery disease vs 42% of patients with no coronary artery disease; P = .0015). CI was performed less frequently in LEB using single-segment great saphenous vein vs LEB using lesser saphenous, arm, or composite vein (48% vs 57%; P < .0001). CI was used in 51% of LEBs with a tibial or pedal target vessel vs 38% of LEBs with a more proximal target vessel (P < .0001). Patients with an indication of critical limb ischemia underwent CI in 45% of LEBs vs 39% with an indication other than critical limb ischemia (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the VQI database, considerable practice pattern variation exists in the use of CI. Currently, CI is most commonly employed for patients with critical limb ischemia, infrageniculate target vessel, and disadvantaged venous conduit. Further study is required to standardize and to define the appropriate use of CI for LEBs.