1
|
Maria Khargi SD, Nelissen AN, Oemrawsingh A, Christian Veger HT, Wever JJ, Wilhelmus Maria Brouwers JJ, Statius van Eps RG. Predicting 30-day Mortality after Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Validation of the Harborview Risk Score in a Single-Center Dutch Study Population. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 105:10-17. [PMID: 38492731 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Harborview Risk Score (HRS) was recently proposed as scoring tool to predict 30-day mortality in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). The HRS assigns 1 point for each of the following preoperative characteristics: age > 76 years, pH < 7.2, creatinine level > 2 mg/dL (> 176.8 μmol/L), and systolic blood pressure < 70 mm Hg, resulting in scores from 0 to 4. The 30-day mortality risk increases with every point. Primarily, we aimed to validate the HRS for the first time in a Dutch study population. A second objective was to identify other clinically relevant predictors for 30-day mortality after repair of rAAA. METHODS Retrospective data from patients who underwent open repair or endovascular aortic repair for a rAAA between January 2009 and February 2022 were reviewed. Patients were grouped by HRS category (score 0-4). The 30-day mortality rate was calculated for each HRS category. Determinants for 30-day mortality were tested for significance and validated for HRS. RESULTS In total, data from 135 patients were included. Open repair was performed in 95 patients and 40 patients underwent endovascular aortic repair. Univariate logistic regression identified pH < 7.2, systolic blood pressure < 70 mm Hg, female sex, performance status, and increase per HRS unit as significant determinants for 30-day mortality. After adjusting for sex and performance status in the multivariate analysis, the association between the HRS per-unit increase and 30-day mortality remained significant (odds ratio 2.532 (95% confidence interval: 1.437-4.461)). The 30-day mortality rate for HRS score 0 was 15.2%, while for HRS score 3 and 4 the mortality was 80% and 100% respectively. CONCLUSIONS The Harborview Risk Score was validated in this single-center Dutch population. Results were concordant with data presented in earlier studies. Therefore, the HRS seems accurate and accessible as preoperative tool. For now, the HRS should guide as an insightful tool to indicate the chances of postoperative mortality during the preoperative conversations in the emergency room, rather than as a decision-making tool whether to operate or not. Our results suggest that female sex and performance status are also relevant predictors that should be assessed in other populations to improve preoperative scoring systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Arvind Oemrawsingh
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Jacob Wever
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yunus RA, Saeed S, Levy N, Di Fenza R, Sharkey A, Pobywajlo S, Liang P, Schermerhorn M, Mahmood F, Matyal R, Neves S. A Multidisciplinary Protocolized Approach for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Management: A Retrospective Before-After Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:755-770. [PMID: 38220517 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) management reduces rates of adverse complications. DESIGN A retrospective before-after study. SETTING A tertiary-care academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients who underwent open or endovascular rAAA repair; data were stratified into before-protocol implementation (group 1: 2015-2018) and after-protocol implementation (group 2: 2019-2022) groups. INTERVENTION The protocol details the workflow for vascular surgery, anesthesia, emergency department, and operating room staff for a rAAA case; training was accomplished through yearly workshops. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause morbidity and other major complications. Differences in postoperative complication rates between groups were assessed using Pearson's χ2 test. Of the 77 patients included undergoing rAAA repair, 41 (53.2%) patients were in group 1, and 36 (46.8%) patients were in group 2. Patients in group 2 had a significantly shorter median time to incision (1.0 v 0.7 hours, p = 0.022) and total procedure time (180.0 v 160.5 minutes, p = 0.039) for both endovascular and open repair. After protocol implementation, patients undergoing endovascular repair exhibited significantly lower rates of mortality (46.2% v 20.0%, p = 0.048), all-cause morbidity (65.4% v 44.0%, p = 0.050), and renal complications (15.4% v 0.0%, p = 0.036); patients undergoing open repair for a rAAA exhibited significantly lower rates of mortality (53.3% v 27.3%, p = 0.018) and bowel ischemia (26.7% v 0.0%, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol for the management of a rAAA may reduce rates of adverse complications and improve the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayaan A Yunus
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Shirin Saeed
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Nadav Levy
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Raffaele Di Fenza
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Aidan Sharkey
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Susan Pobywajlo
- The CardioVascular Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Patric Liang
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Feroze Mahmood
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Robina Matyal
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| | - Sara Neves
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berchiolli R, Troisi N, Bertagna G, D’Oria M, Mezzetto L, Malquori V, Artini V, Motta D, Grosso L, Grando B, Badalamenti G, Calvagna C, Mastrorilli D, Veraldi GF, Adami D, Lepidi S. Intraoperative Predictors and Proposal for a Novel Prognostic Risk Score for In-Hospital Mortality after Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (SPARTAN Score). J Clin Med 2024; 13:1384. [PMID: 38592197 PMCID: PMC10934212 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Several mortality risk scores have been developed to predict mortality in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs), but none focused on intraoperative factors. The aim of this study is to identify intraoperative variables affecting in-hospital mortality after open repair and develop a novel prognostic risk score. (2) Methods: The analysis of a retrospectively maintained dataset identified patients who underwent open repair for rAAA from January 2007 to October 2023 in three Italian tertiary referral centers. Multinomial logistic regression was used to calculate the association between intraoperative variables and perioperative mortality. Independent intraoperative factors were used to create a prognostic score. (3) Results: In total, 316 patients with a mean age of 77.3 (SD ± 8.5) were included. In-hospital mortality rate was 30.7%. Hemoperitoneum (p < 0.001), suprarenal clamping (p = 0.001), and operation times of >240 min (p = 0.008) were negative predictors of perioperative mortality, while the patency of at least one hypogastric artery had a protective role (p = 0.008). Numerical values were assigned to each variable based on the respective odds ratio to create a risk stratification for in-hospital mortality. (4) Conclusions: rAAA represents a major cause of mortality. Intraoperative variables are essential to estimate patients' risk in surgically treated patients. A prognostic risk score based on these factors alone may be useful to predict in-hospital mortality after open repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella Berchiolli
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (R.B.); (N.T.); (G.B.); (V.M.); (V.A.); (D.M.); (D.A.)
| | - Nicola Troisi
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (R.B.); (N.T.); (G.B.); (V.M.); (V.A.); (D.M.); (D.A.)
| | - Giulia Bertagna
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (R.B.); (N.T.); (G.B.); (V.M.); (V.A.); (D.M.); (D.A.)
| | - Mario D’Oria
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34148 Trieste, Italy; (B.G.); (G.B.); (C.C.); (S.L.)
| | - Luca Mezzetto
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Trust of Verona, University of Verona School of Medicine, 37134 Verona, Italy; (L.M.); (L.G.); (D.M.); (G.F.V.)
| | - Vittorio Malquori
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (R.B.); (N.T.); (G.B.); (V.M.); (V.A.); (D.M.); (D.A.)
| | - Valerio Artini
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (R.B.); (N.T.); (G.B.); (V.M.); (V.A.); (D.M.); (D.A.)
| | - Duilio Motta
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (R.B.); (N.T.); (G.B.); (V.M.); (V.A.); (D.M.); (D.A.)
| | - Lorenzo Grosso
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Trust of Verona, University of Verona School of Medicine, 37134 Verona, Italy; (L.M.); (L.G.); (D.M.); (G.F.V.)
| | - Beatrice Grando
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34148 Trieste, Italy; (B.G.); (G.B.); (C.C.); (S.L.)
| | - Giovanni Badalamenti
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34148 Trieste, Italy; (B.G.); (G.B.); (C.C.); (S.L.)
| | - Cristiano Calvagna
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34148 Trieste, Italy; (B.G.); (G.B.); (C.C.); (S.L.)
| | - Davide Mastrorilli
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Trust of Verona, University of Verona School of Medicine, 37134 Verona, Italy; (L.M.); (L.G.); (D.M.); (G.F.V.)
| | - Gian Franco Veraldi
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Trust of Verona, University of Verona School of Medicine, 37134 Verona, Italy; (L.M.); (L.G.); (D.M.); (G.F.V.)
| | - Daniele Adami
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (R.B.); (N.T.); (G.B.); (V.M.); (V.A.); (D.M.); (D.A.)
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34148 Trieste, Italy; (B.G.); (G.B.); (C.C.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hafeez MS, Habib SG, Semaan DB, Abdul-Malak O, Liang NL, Madigan MC, Siracuse JJ, Eslami MH. Outcomes of octogenarians receiving aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:34-43.e3. [PMID: 37714501 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is recommended for aneurysms greater than 5.5 cm in men and 5 cm in women. Because AAA is more common among the elderly, we sought to evaluate contemporary practices of elective AAA repair and 2-year postoperative outcomes in octogenarians. METHODS We identified octogenarians undergoing elective AAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2012 to 2019. We included patients undergoing endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) aortic repair. Demographics and comorbid conditions were compared between patient groups. Frailty was calculated using previously published methods. Patients with frailty scores above the 75th percentile of the operative cohort were considered high frailty. The primary outcome was 1- and 2-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications. Standard statistical methods were utilized. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors that affect mortality. RESULTS The frequency of AAA repair in octogenarians has remained stable. Of all aortic operations, 21.4% were performed on octogenarians; 9735 (23.3% of 41,712) EVAR and 755 (10.3% of 7325) OARs. Among octogenarian patients, 42.0% of EVARs were under size thresholds: 48.3% males ≤5.5 cm diameter and 21.5% females ≤5.0 cm diameter compared with 18.8% OARs: 23.4% males and 10.7% females. Additionally, 25.6% had high frailty scores. Among octogenarians, 1- and 2-year mortality was 9.3% ± 0.3% and 14.8% ± 0.4% for EVAR and 15.2% ± 1.3% and 18.9% ± 1.5% for OAR patients, respectively (P < .01). In-hospital mortality rate was higher after OAR (0.87% EVAR vs 7.55% OAR; P < .01) and differed with frailty (EVAR, low frailty 0.2% vs high frailty 1.7%; OAR, low frailty 2.3% vs high frailty 15.6%). For EVAR, patient factors associated with mortality included heart failure (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.25; P = .001) and dialysis (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.13-2.59; P = .012). For OAR, coronary artery disease (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.98-2.44; P = .062) was associated with mortality. Statin use was protective of mortality for all patients (EVAR: HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.78; P < .01): OAR: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.92; P = .020). Among octogenarians, high frailty was independently associated with 2-year mortality (EVAR: HR, 3.36; 95% CI, 2.62-4.31; P < .01 and OAR: HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.09-5.10; P = .030). CONCLUSIONS Nationally, a large portion of elective AAA repair in octogenarians is performed below recommended size thresholds, one-quarter of whom are frail with poor long-term 2-year mortality rates. High 2-year mortality following AAA repair in this age group exceeds the published risk of rupture for 5- to 5.5-cm AAA, suggesting that increase in the size threshold of elective repair among octogenarians should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Salim G Habib
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Dana B Semaan
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Nathan L Liang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Michael C Madigan
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Mohammad H Eslami
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim H, Kwon TW, Cho YP, Gwon JG, Han Y, Lee SA, Kim YJ, Kim S. Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e321. [PMID: 37821088 PMCID: PMC10562185 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a serious complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with high operative mortality and morbidity rates. The present study evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes of Korean patients with rAAA based on national health insurance claims data. METHODS The National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database was searched retrospectively to identify patients with rAAA who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) from 2009 to 2018. Perioperative (≤ 30 days), early postoperative (≤ 3 month), and long-term (> 3 month) survival, reinterventions, and complications were assessed. RESULTS The search identified 1,034 patients with rAAA, including 594 who underwent EVAR and 440 who underwent OSR. When the study period was divided into two, the total numbers of patients with rAAA, patients who underwent EVAR, and octogenarians were higher during the second half. The perioperative mortality rate was 29.8% in the EVAR and 35.0% in the OSR group (P = 0.028). Hartmann's procedure for bowel infarction was performed more frequently in the OSR than in the EVAR group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-21.84; P = 0.001), but other complication rates did not differ significantly. All-cause mortality during the entire observation period did not differ significantly in the EVAR and OSR groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98-1.41; P = 0.087). Abdominal aortic aneurysm-related reintervention rate was significantly lower in the OSR group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.70; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION Although EVAR showed somewhat superior perioperative outcomes for rAAA, the long-term outcomes of EVAR after excluding initial 3 months were significantly worse than OSR. When anatomically feasible for both treatments, the perioperative mortality risk and reasonable prospects of long-term survival should be considered in rAAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyangkyoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Won Kwon
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Yong-Pil Cho
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Gyo Gwon
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngjin Han
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Ah Lee
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ye-Jee Kim
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seonok Kim
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Jakimowicz T, Torrealba JI, Jama K, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Kölbel T. Urgent and emergent repair of complex aortic aneurysms using an off-the-shelf branched device. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1277459. [PMID: 37808886 PMCID: PMC10556233 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1277459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Endovascular repair using off-the-shelf endografts is a viable solution in patients with ruptured or symptomatic complex aortic aneurysms. This analysis aimed to present the peri-operative and follow-up outcomes in urgent and emergent cases managed with the t-Branch multibranched thoracoabdominal endograft. Methods Prospectively collected data from all consecutive urgent and emergent cases managed in two aortic centers between January 1st, 2014, to November 30th, 2022, using the t-Branch device (Cook Medical Inc., Bjaeverskov, Denmark) were analyzed. Patients presenting with ruptured aortic complex aneurysms were characterized as emergent and patients with aneurysms >90 mm of diameter, or symptomatic aneurysms were characterized as urgent. Technical success, 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAE) and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rates were assessed. Results 225 patients (36.5% females, 72.5 ± 2.8 years) were included; 73.0% were urgent. The mean aneurysm diameter was 109 ± 3.9 mm and 44.4% were type I-III TAAAs. Females (p = .03), para-renal aneurysms (p = .02) and ASA score IV (p < .001) were more common in emergent cases. Technical success was 97.8%. Thirty-day mortality and MAE rates were 17.8% and 30.6%, respectively. SCI rate was 14.7%, (4.8% paraplegia rate) with 22.2% of patients receiving prophylactic cerebrospinal drainage. Thirty-day mortality (13.3% vs. 26.7%, p = .04) and MAE (26.0% vs. 43.0%, p = .02) were more common among emergent cases while technical success (97.6% vs. 98.3%, p = .9), and SCI (13.3% vs. 18.3%, p = .4) were similar. Survival at 12-months was 83.5% (SE 5.9%) for the urgent and 77.1% (SE 8.2%) for the emergent group (log rank, p = 0.96). Conclusion T-Branch represents an effective and safe solution for the management of urgent and emergent cases with complex aortic aneurysms, with high technical success, promising early mortality and SCI rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tomasz Jakimowicz
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jose I. Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Jama
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shen Y, Wang J, Zhao J, Yuan D, Wang T, Huang B. DANCER: Study protocol of a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial for crossed limb versus standard limb configuration in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1046200. [DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1046200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundHostile anatomy, especially severely angulated neck and tortuous iliac arteries, has always been a conundrum in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Crossed limb (CL) graft, also called the “ballerina technique,” has been utilized to address this problem by facilitating gate cannulation. In terms of short and long-term outcomes, correlated studies have made inconsistent conclusions and this issue remains controversial. Based on a previous cohort study conducted in our center, we aim to prospectively compare the safety and efficacy between CL and standard limb (SL) configuration in patients receiving EVAR.MethodsThis is a prospective, single-center, non-randomized controlled trial. A total of 275 patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled and allocated with a 4:11 ratio of CL to SL, which is based on results of our previous study. All patients will receive same perioperative management and postoperative medications. All EVAR procedures will be performed under standard protocol, utilizing Endurant II or IIs Stent Graft. The configuration of the graft stent will be decided by surgeons and confirmed by final angiography. The primary outcome is 3-year freedom from major adverse limb-graft events (MALEs). Endpoints will be assessed at the following time points: 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.DiscussionTo our best knowledge, this crosseD vs. stANdard Configuration in Endovascular Repair (DANCER) trial is the first non-randomized controlled trial to compare these two graft configurations in EVAR. The main aim is to compare the MALEs between two groups at 3 years postoperatively. This trial will hopefully provide high-level evidence for employing CL in EVAR.Clinical trial registration[www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2100053055].
Collapse
|
8
|
Lei J, Pu H, Wu Z, Huang Q, Yang X, Liu G, Lu X. Local versus general anesthesia for endovascular aneurysm repair in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 100:679-686. [PMID: 35801490 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND In the endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA), there is no effective evidence to show preference for a specific anesthetic option. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the result of different anesthesia in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of RAAA. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were applied to evaluate the quality of cohort studies and RCTs, respectively. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to express differences for primary and secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were applied in the primary outcome to illustrate the results further. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Random-effects models were used considering limited research regardless of I2 < 50%. RESULTS Ten cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Perioperative mortality was presented as the primary outcome by analyzing eight of these research. Among the included patients, local anesthesia (LA) was considered as a better choice considering perioperative mortality (n = 156/902) rather than general anesthesia (n = 907/3434) with significant difference (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.35-0.67; p < 0.00001; I2 = 42%). However, no significant difference was found in the secondary outcome: the complication rate, ICU admission rate, postoperative morbidity of pneumonia, myocardial infarction, leg ischemia, and wound complication. CONCLUSIONS There exists some evidence in this review that LA appears to improve perioperative mortality, especially in hemodynamically stable patients and should be recommended for patients undergoing EVAR with RAAA when appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahao Lei
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongji Pu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaoyu Wu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qun Huang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinrui Yang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guang Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinwu Lu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Vascular Center of Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pratesi C, Esposito D, Apostolou D, Attisani L, Bellosta R, Benedetto F, Blangetti I, Bonardelli S, Casini A, Fargion AT, Favaretto E, Freyrie A, Frola E, Miele V, Niola R, Novali C, Panzera C, Pegorer M, Perini P, Piffaretti G, Pini R, Robaldo A, Sartori M, Stigliano A, Taurino M, Veroux P, Verzini F, Zaninelli E, Orso M. Guidelines on the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: updates from the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE). THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2022; 63:328-352. [PMID: 35658387 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12330-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The objective of these Guidelines was to revise and update the previous 2016 Italian Guidelines on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease, in accordance with the National Guidelines System (SNLG), to guide every practitioner toward the most correct management pathway for this pathology. The methodology applied in this update was the GRADE-SIGN version methodology, following the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist as well. The first methodological step was the formulation of clinical questions structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) model according to which the Recommendations were issued. Then, systematic reviews of the Literature were carried out for each PICO question or for homogeneous groups of questions, followed by the selection of the articles and the assessment of the methodological quality for each of them using qualitative checklists. Finally, a Considered Judgment form was filled in for each clinical question, in which the features of the evidence as a whole are assessed to establish the transition from the level of evidence to the direction and strength of the recommendations. These guidelines outline the correct management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in terms of screening and surveillance. Medical management and indication for surgery are discussed, as well as preoperative assessment regarding patients' background and surgical risk evaluation. Once the indication for surgery has been established, the options for traditional open and endovascular surgery are described and compared, focusing specifically on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms as well. Finally, indications for early and late postoperative follow-up are explained. The most recent evidence in the Literature has been able to confirm and possibly modify the previous recommendations updating them, likewise to propose new recommendations on prospectively relevant topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Pratesi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Esposito
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy -
| | | | - Luca Attisani
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Raffaello Bellosta
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Filippo Benedetto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, AOU Policlinico Martino, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Casini
- Department of Intensive Care, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Aaron T Fargion
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Favaretto
- Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Freyrie
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Edoardo Frola
- Department of Vascular Surgery, AO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Raffaella Niola
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudio Novali
- Department of Vascular Surgery, GVM Maria Pia Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Panzera
- Department of Vascular Surgery, AOU Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Pegorer
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Perini
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Rodolfo Pini
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Robaldo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ticino Vascular Center - Lugano Regional Hospital, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Michelangelo Sartori
- Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Fabio Verzini
- Department of Vascular Surgery, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Erica Zaninelli
- Department of General Medical Practice, ATS Bergamo - ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Orso
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kessler V, Klopf J, Eilenberg W, Neumayer C, Brostjan C. AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis. Biomedicines 2022; 10:94. [PMID: 35052774 PMCID: PMC8773452 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite declining incidence and mortality rates in many countries, the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) continues to represent a life-threatening cardiovascular condition with an overall prevalence of about 2-3% in the industrialized world. While the risk of AAA development is considerably higher for men of advanced age with a history of smoking, screening programs serve to detect the often asymptomatic condition and prevent aortic rupture with an associated death rate of up to 80%. This review summarizes the current knowledge on identified risk factors, the multifactorial process of pathogenesis, as well as the latest advances in medical treatment and surgical repair to provide a perspective for AAA management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Christine Brostjan
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (V.K.); (J.K.); (W.E.); (C.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Casajuana E, Clarà A, Grochowicz L, Vivas I, Mateos E, Calsina L. Testicular pain as a warning symptom of a symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm: case report and review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 80:395.e1-395.e5. [PMID: 34808265 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.10.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Isolated testicular pain is an unusual clinical presentation of symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We present two patients hemodynamically stable with an isolated acute testicular pain related to an AAA and a review of the published literature up to present. CASE REPORT Two adult-old males with an acute isolated testicular pain presented to the emergency department. Although both cases had their symptoms for more than 24 hours and were hemodynamically stable, the misdiagnosis of a urological condition in one case and a delay of the intervention in the second resulted in a sudden drop of vital signs and the need of an urgent open surgery. DISCUSSION A bibliographic review of the 15 published cases is presented. Most cases occurred without a previous diagnosis of AAA. Aneurysms were characteristically very large (mean 10 cm). The initial diagnosis was frequently wrong, attributing the pain mostly to genito-urinary conditions. The testicular pain presented days and even weeks before rupture, which may offer a convenient window of hemodynamic stability for repair. CONCLUSIONS Acute testicular pain in adult-old patients with aneurysm risk factors and specially with a first urological evaluation discarding a genitourinary disorder should alert clinicians to consider the diagnosis of a symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm. The early and accurate recognition of these cases may increase the survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Casajuana
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Clarà
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Cardiovascular, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona.
| | - Lukasz Grochowicz
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Isabel Vivas
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Eduardo Mateos
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Calsina
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ho VT, Rothenberg KA, George EL, Lee JT, Stern JR. Female sex is independently associated with in-hospital mortality after endovascular aortic repair for ruptured aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 81:148-153. [PMID: 34752855 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) can treat anatomically compatible ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA), but registry data suggests that women undergo more open abdominal aneurysm repairs than men. We evaluate in-hospital outcomes of EVAR for rAAA by sex. METHODS The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry was queried from 2013 to 2019 for rAAA patients treated with EVAR. Univariate analysis was performed with Student's t-test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to assess the association between female sex and inpatient mortality. RESULTS 1775 patients were included (23.8% female). Female rAAA patients were older (p < 0.01) and weighed less (p < 0.01). They were less likely to have smoked (p <. 001) and had lower creatinine (1.29 vs 1.43, p <0.01) and hemoglobin (10.7 vs 11.7, p < 0.01). Women had smaller maximum aortic diameters (74 vs 66 mm, p < 0.01) and were less likely to have iliac aneurysms (p <.001). Women were more likely to have concomitant femoral endarterectomy (8.5% vs 4.6%, p=.03). Despite having no significant difference in complication or reintervention rates, women had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (45.9% vs 34.5%, p < 0.01). In a logistic regression model for predictors of in-hospital mortality (χ2 < .01), increased age (OR 1.08, p < 0.01), female sex (OR 1.7, p=0.02), preoperative cardiac arrest (OR 5.29, p<0.01), concurrent iliac stenting (OR 2.38, p =0.02), postoperative mesenteric ischemia (OR 2.51, p<0.01) and postoperative transfusion (OR 1.06, p <0.01) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Increased preoperative hemoglobin was protective (OR 0.89, p < 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: Female sex is independently associated with in-hospital mortality after EVAR for rAAA, suggesting a relationship beyond anatomical, biochemical, and procedural covariates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vy T Ho
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| | - Kara A Rothenberg
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elizabeth L George
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Jason T Lee
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Jordan R Stern
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shih CW, Ho ST, Shui HA, Tang CT, Shih CC, Chen TJ, Lin KC, Liang CY, Wang KY. Endovascular aortic repair is a cost-effective option for in-hospital patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Chin Med Assoc 2021; 84:890-899. [PMID: 34261982 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the cost-effectiveness of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) versus open aortic repair (OAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using incremental costs per decreased in-hospital mortality rate gained through our patients' cohort. METHODS Medical records and healthcare costs of patients with AAA hospitalized between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. Multiple regression analysis was applied to adjust for confounding factors and to compare the differences in postoperative clinical outcomes between patients who received EVAR and OAR. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of EVAR was determined based on the healthcare cost obtained from the analyzed data. RESULTS A total of 2803 AAA patients were identified (n = 559 with ruptured AAA and n = 2244 unruptured AAA). Patients with ruptured AAA who underwent EVAR compared with OAR patients had shorter hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays (all p < 0.05). For patients with unruptured AAA, those who received EVAR compared with OAR, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality were 0.371 and 0.447 (all p < 0.05). The total direct surgical costs and medical expenses during hospitalization in all AAA patients were higher for the EVAR group; however, ICER was <1 per capita gross domestic product. Stratification by age groups further suggested that ICER for patients with unruptured AAA who received EVAR, compared with OAR, decreased with age. CONCLUSION Total direct medical costs were higher for AAA patients receiving EVAR regardless of rupture status; however, the cost is offset by lower odds of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. The observed decrease in ICER with age and EVAR use warrants further analysis. Our findings further validate the use of EVAR over OAR. These results provides supporting evidence for physicians and patients with AAA to inform shared decision making regarding endovascular or OAR options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Wen Shih
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shung-Tai Ho
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Hao-Ai Shui
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chi-Tun Tang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, National Defense Medical Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chun-Che Shih
- Taipei Heart Institute, Taipei Medical University, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Tzeng-Ji Chen
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Kuan-Chia Lin
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Community Medicine Research Center, Taipei, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chun-Yu Liang
- School of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Kwua-Yun Wang
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Choo SJ, Jeon YB, Oh SS, Shinn SH. Outcomes of emergency endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Ann Surg Treat Res 2021; 100:291-297. [PMID: 34012947 PMCID: PMC8103156 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.5.291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is one of the most common aortic emergencies in vascular surgery and is associated with high operative mortality and morbidity rates despite recent treatment advances. We evaluated operative mortality risks for the outcomes of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) vs. open repair in rAAA. Methods Twenty patients underwent eEVAR (n = 12) or open repair (n = 8) for rAAA between 2016 and 2020. We adopted the EVAR first strategy since 2018. Primary endpoints included in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival. The outcome variables were analyzed with Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney test, and linear by linear association. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Results There were 13 males (65.0%) and the median age of the study cohort was 78.0 years (range, 49–88 years). In-hospital mortality occurred in 7 patients (35.0%); 5 (50.0%) in the early period and 2 (20.0%) in the later period of this series. According to the procedure type, 4 (50.0%) and 3 (25.0%) in-hospital mortalities occurred in the open repair and eEVAR patients, respectively. In 6 patients (50.0%), eEVAR was performed on unfavorable anatomy. The 1-year survival of eEVAR vs. open repair group was 75% ± 12.5% and 50% ± 17.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, preoperative high-risk indices, postoperative acute renal failure requiring dialysis, pulmonary complications, and prolonged mechanical ventilation were associated with higher operative mortality. Conclusion The current data showed relatively superior outcomes with eEVAR vs. open repair for rAAA, even in some patients with unfavorable anatomy supporting the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EVAR first strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Jung Choo
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yang-Bin Jeon
- Department of Traumatology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Sam-Sae Oh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Ho Shinn
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cheju Halla General Hospital, Jeju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Deng J, Liu J, Rong D, Ge Y, Zhang H, Liu X, Guo W. A meta-analysis of locoregional anesthesia versus general anesthesia in endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:700-710. [PMID: 32882348 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a meta-analytic review of studies investigating the effect of the anesthesia modality on perioperative mortality in endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (REVAR). METHODS The present meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Multiple electronic databases were comprehensively searched from database inception to January 2020. Eligible studies included cohort studies that reported the 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate or the multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio of the mortality risk for patients who underwent emergency REVAR under locoregional anesthesia (LA) vs general anesthesia (GA). A random effects model was used to estimate the ORs by pooling the related data from individual studies. RESULTS A total of eight studies were included in this analysis. The first meta-analysis of seven studies that reported the 30-day/in-hospital mortality with a total of 3116 patients (867 in the LA group and 2249 in the GA group) revealed that LA was associated with a lower 30-day/in-hospital mortality than GA (16.4% vs 25.4%; unadjusted OR, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.68). The second meta-analysis of three of these seven studies (including 586 patients in the LA group and 1945 in the GA group) that reported the perioperative variables revealed comparable baseline characteristics but a lower 30-day/in-hospital mortality in the LA group (unadjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.71). The third meta-analysis of the adjusted ORs or hazard ratios that were reported from four studies (including 501 patients in the LA group and 1136 in the GA group) showed a similar trend (adjusted OR,0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.75). CONCLUSIONS REVAR under LA is associated with a lower 30-day/in-hospital mortality than REVAR under GA. However, because the included studies may have had some observation bias, further randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the present results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianqing Deng
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dan Rong
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yangyang Ge
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongpeng Zhang
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoping Liu
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|