1
|
Patel RJ, Dodo-Williams TS, Sendek G, Elsayed N, Malas MB. Non-White Patients Have a Higher Risk of Stroke Following Transcarotid Artery Revascularization. J Surg Res 2024; 300:71-78. [PMID: 38796903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Carotid artery revascularization has traditionally been performed by either a carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stent. Large data analysis has suggested there are differences in perioperative outcomes with regards to race, with non-White patients (NWP) having worse outcomes of stroke, restenosis and return to the operating room (RTOR). The introduction of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has started to shift the paradigm of carotid disease treatment. However, to date, there have been no studies assessing the difference in postoperative outcomes after TCAR between racial groups. METHODS All patients from 2016 to 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative who underwent TCAR were included in our analysis. Patients were split into two groups based on race: individuals who identified as White and a second group that comprised all other races. Demographic and clinical variables were compared using Student's t-Test and chi-square test of independence. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of race on perioperative outcomes of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), death, restenosis, RTOR, and transient ischemic attack (TIA). RESULTS The cohort consisted of 22,609 patients: 20,424 (90.3%) White patients and 2185 (9.7%) NWP. After adjusting for sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, history of prior stroke or TIA, symptomatic status, and high-risk criteria at time of TCAR, there was a significant difference in postoperative stroke, with 63% increased risk in NWP (odds ratio = 1.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-2.40, P = 0.014). However, we found no significant difference in the odds of MI, death, postoperative TIA, restenosis, or RTOR when comparing NWP to White patients. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that NWP have increased risk of stroke but similar outcomes of death, MI, RTOR and restenosis following TCAR. Future studies are needed to elucidate and address the underlying causes of racial disparity in carotid revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Taiwo S Dodo-Williams
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Gabriela Sendek
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Nadin Elsayed
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen P, Siegler E, Siracuse JJ, O'Donnell TFX, Patel VI, Morrissey NJ. Association between Asian race and perioperative outcomes after carotid revascularization varies with Asian procedure density. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)01226-6. [PMID: 38821432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative outcomes following carotid revascularization are understudied in Asian patients. We aimed to assess whether disease severity and postoperative outcomes following carotid revascularization differ between Asian and White patients, and whether this varies with Asian procedure density. METHODS We analyzed the Vascular Quality Initiative Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting datasets from 2003 to 2021. Regions were divided into tertiles based on Asian procedure density. Propensity scores were used to match Asian and White patients based on patient factors and procedure type. The primary outcome variable was a collapsed composite of in-hospital ipsilateral stroke/death/myocardial infarction. χ2 tests were used to assess association between Asian race and disease severity, center and surgeon volume, and 1-year outcomes. Logistic and Cox regressions were performed between the matched cohorts. RESULTS A total of 1766 Asian and 159,608 White patients underwent carotid revascularization, and we identified 2704 patients (1352 Asian and 1352 White) in the matched cohorts. Among propensity matched patients, all-comer Asian patients more commonly had >80% ipsilateral stenosis (63% vs 52%; P < .001) and a moderate/severe preoperative Rankin score (7.6% vs 5.1%; P = .007). The rate of in-hospital stroke/death/myocardial infarction was higher in Asian patients (2.6% vs 1.3%; P = .012), and this disparity was more pronounced in the lowest tertile of Asian procedure density (4.3% vs 0.5%; P < .001). Logistic regression in the propensity-matched cohort demonstrated Asian race was associated with lower odds of intervention at highest volume centers (odds ratio [OR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.3; P < .001) and by highest volume surgeons (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.3-0.4; P < .001). Asian race was associated with higher odds of in-hospital stroke/death/myocardial infarction (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.8; P = .031), and there was a significant interaction between Asian procedure density and the relationship between Asian race and this outcome (interaction P = .001). After accounting for center and surgeon volume, the association of Asian race and the composite outcome was mitigated (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.7-3.3; P = .300). Cox regression between the matched cohorts demonstrated that Asian race was associated with lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P = .001) and higher risk of 1-year reintervention (hazard ratio, 16; 95% CI, 1.8-142; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS Asian patients are more likely to present with a higher degree of carotid stenosis, higher preoperative risk, and experience worse perioperative outcomes. The association of Asian race with perioperative stroke/death/myocardial infarction varies with Asian procedure density and is also confounded by center and surgeon volume. These results highlight the importance of understanding referral patterns and cultural effects on outcomes disparities in Asian patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panpan Chen
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
| | - Emily Siegler
- California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas F X O'Donnell
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicholas J Morrissey
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zil-E-Ali A, Alamarie B, Paracha AW, Samaan F, Aziz F. Systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the racial disparities in the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in the United States. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)01213-8. [PMID: 38782214 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Race-based disparities in health care have been related to a myriad of prevailing factors among minorities in the United States. This study aims to study the race-based differences in the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS The PROSPERO database registered the review protocol (CRD42023428253). A systematic English literature review was performed using literature databases PubMed and Scopus from inception till June 2023. The review was designed on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and included studies reporting mortality, stroke, or composite outcome of mortality and stroke after CEA for carotid artery disease, regardless of any degree of stenosis including both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The risk of bias was evaluated utilizing the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. A pooled odds ratio (OR) for the overall mortality was computed, and a P value of < .05 was designated as statistically significant. Interstudy heterogeneity was evaluated by Q-metric and quantified using Higgins I2 statistics. RESULTS Twelve studies were identified which included a total of 574,055 patients who underwent CEA from 1998 to 2022. Eleven of 12 studies reported 30-day mortality as an outcome for patients undergoing CEA in which 524,708 patients (92.5%) were White and 42,797 (7.5%) were non-White. The overall pooled OR indicated a statistical significance in 30-day mortality between White and non-White patients undergoing CEA (OR, 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.18; P = .011) with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 56.3%). Eleven of 12 studies reported stroke as an outcome for patients undergoing CEA in which 524,708 patients (92.5%) were White and 42,801 (7.5%) were non-White. The overall pooled OR indicated no statistical significance in stroke between White and non-White patients undergoing CEA (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.28-1.65; P = .111) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 35.9%). Five of 12 studies reported composite mortality or stroke as an outcome for patients undergoing CEA. The overall pooled OR indicated no statistical significance in composite mortality or stroke between White and non-White patients undergoing CEA (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.59; P = .467) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS Non-White patients have a relatively higher risk of mortality; however, no significant difference was observed between the racial groups in terms of stroke or a composite outcome of mortality or stroke. The odds of mortality in non-White patients have been persistent throughout recent studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahsan Zil-E-Ali
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
| | - Billal Alamarie
- Office of Medical Education, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State University, State College, PA
| | - Abdul Wasay Paracha
- Office of Medical Education, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State University, State College, PA
| | - Fadi Samaan
- Office of Medical Education, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State University, State College, PA
| | - Faisal Aziz
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li R, Sidawy A, Nguyen BN. Comparative assessment of racial disparity in 30-day outcomes for Asian Americans undergoing carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:1132-1141. [PMID: 38142944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective treatment for carotid stenosis. All previous studies on racial disparity of CEA outcomes omitted Asian Americans. This study aimed to address this gap by investigating racial disparities in 30-day outcomes following CEA among Asian Americans. METHODS Asian American and Caucasian patients who underwent CEA were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted database from 2011 to 2021. Patients with age less than 18 years old were excluded. Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis were examined separately. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was used to address preoperative differences. Thirty perioperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS There were 380 Asian Americans (2.27%) and 13,250 Caucasians (79.18%) with symptomatic carotid stenosis who underwent CEA. Also, 289 Asian Americans (1.40%) and 18,257 Caucasians (88.14%) with asymptomatic carotid stenosis had CEA. Asian Americans undergoing CEA presented with higher comorbid burdens and more severe symptomology. Also, asymptomatic Asian Americans were more likely to undergo surgeries for mild stenosis (<50%), which is not in line with practice guidelines. After 1:5 propensity-matching, all symptomatic Asian Americans were matched to 1550 Caucasian patients, and all asymptomatic Asian Americans were matched to 1445 Caucasians; preoperative differences were addressed. Asian Americans exhibited low overall 30-day mortality (symptomatic, 1.61%; asymptomatic, 0.35%) and stroke (symptomatic, 2.26%; asymptomatic, 0.69%). All perioperative outcomes were comparable to Caucasians, with the exception that Asian Americans experienced longer operation times. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggested that Asian Americans with asymptomatic stenosis were underrepresented in CEA. After propensity-score matching, Asian Americans demonstrated comparable 30-day outcomes to Caucasians. These suggest that, when afforded equal access to quality health care, CEA serves as an effective treatment for carotid stenosis among Asian Americans. Therefore, efforts may be aimed at addressing health care access, potentially in the screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis in Asian Americans. This would ensure they have equitable benefits from CEA. Nevertheless, the exact preoperative differences and long-term CEA outcomes in Asian Americans should warrant further examination in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renxi Li
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
| | - Anton Sidawy
- The George Washington University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Washington, DC
| | - Bao-Ngoc Nguyen
- The George Washington University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bose S, McDermott KM, Keegan A, Black JH, Drudi LM, Lum YW, Zarkowsky DS, Hicks CW. Socioeconomic status fails to account for worse outcomes in non-Hispanic black patients undergoing carotid revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:1248-1259.e1. [PMID: 37419427 PMCID: PMC10615195 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies have reported an association of Black race with worse carotid revascularization outcomes, but rarely include socioeconomic status as a confounding covariate. We aimed to assess the association of race and ethnicity with in-hospital and long-term outcomes following carotid revascularization before and after accounting for socioeconomic status. METHODS We identified non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic white patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy, transfemoral carotid stenting, or transcarotid artery revascularization between 2003 and 2022 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Primary outcomes were in-hospital stroke/death and long-term stroke/death. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of race with perioperative and long-term outcomes after adjusting for baseline characteristics using a sequential model approach without and with consideration of Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated composite marker of socioeconomic status. RESULTS Of 201,395 patients, 5.1% (n = 10,195) were non-Hispanic Black, and 94.9% (n = 191,200) were non-Hispanic white. Mean follow-up time was 3.4±0.01 years. A disproportionately high percentage of Black patients were living in more socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods relative to their white counterparts (67.5% vs 54.2%; P < .001). After adjusting for demographic, comorbidity, and disease characteristics, Black race was associated with greater odds of in-hospital (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.40) and long-term stroke/death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23). These associations did not substantially change after additionally adjusting for ADI; Black race was persistently associated with greater odds of in-hospital (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39) and long-term stroke/death (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21). Patients living in the most deprived neighborhoods were at greater risk of long-term stroke/death compared with patients living in the least deprived neighborhoods (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35). CONCLUSIONS Non-Hispanic Black race is associated with worse in-hospital and long-term outcomes following carotid revascularization despite accounting for neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. There appears to be unrecognized gaps in care that prevent Black patients from experiencing equitable outcomes following carotid artery revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanuja Bose
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Alana Keegan
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Surgery, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
| | - James H. Black
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Laura M. Drudi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ying-Wei Lum
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Caitlin W. Hicks
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kiguchi MM, Fallentine J, Oh JH, Cutler B, Yan Y, Patel HR, Shao MY, Agrawal N, Carmona E, Hager ES, Ali A, Kochubey M, O'Banion LA. Race, sex, and socioeconomic disparities affect the clinical stage of patients presenting for treatment of superficial venous disease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2023; 11:897-903. [PMID: 37343787 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Superficial venous disease has a U.S. prevalence of nearly 30%, with advanced disease contributing to a significant healthcare burden. Although the risk factors for venous disease are well known, the correlation between race, sex, socioeconomic status, and disease severity on presentation is not well established. The area deprivation index (ADI) is a validated metric with respect to regional geography, social determinants of health, and degree of socioeconomic disadvantage. In the present study, we aimed to identify the disparities and the effect that the ADI, in addition to race and sex, has among patients associated with an advanced venous disease presentation. METHODS A retrospective review between 2012 and 2022 was performed at four tertiary U.S. institutions to identify patients who underwent endovenous closure of their saphenous veins. Patient demographics, state ADI, comorbidities, CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification, and periprocedural outcomes were included. Pearson's correlation was performed between the CEAP classification and ADI. Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify factors predicting for an increasing CEAP classification at presentation. Variables with P < .05 were deemed significant. RESULTS A total of 2346 patients underwent endovenous saphenous vein closure during the study period, of whom 7 were excluded because of a lack of follow-up data. The mean age was 60.4 ± 14.9 years, 65.9% were women, and 55.4% were White. Of the 2339 patients, 73.3% presented with an advanced CEAP class (≥3). The mean state ADI for the entire cohort was 4.9 ± 3.1. The percent change in the CEAP classification is an increase of 2% and 1% for every level increase in the state ADI for unadjusted (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.02; P < .001) and adjusted (IRR = 1.01; P < .001) models, respectively. Black race has a 12% increased risk of a higher CEAP class on presentation compared with White race (IRR = 1.12; P = .005). Female sex had a 16% lower risk of a higher CEAP presentation compared with male sex (IRR = 0.84; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Low socioeconomic status, Black race, and male sex are predictive of an advanced CEAP classification on initial presentation. These findings highlight the opportunity for improved mechanisms for identification of venous disease and at-risk patients before advanced disease progression in known disadvantaged patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misaki M Kiguchi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
| | | | - Jae Hak Oh
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Bianca Cutler
- Department of Vascular Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Yueqi Yan
- Biostatistics and Data Support Center, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA
| | - Harik R Patel
- St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Y Shao
- Division of Vascular Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, IL
| | - Nishant Agrawal
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Emely Carmona
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Eric S Hager
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Amna Ali
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, CA
| | - Mariya Kochubey
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, CA
| | - Leigh Ann O'Banion
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen P, Lazar A, Ding J, Siracuse JJ, Patel VI, Morrissey NJ. Insurance status is associated with urgent carotid endarterectomy and worse postoperative outcomes. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:818-826.e1. [PMID: 36257345 PMCID: PMC9974840 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Underinsured patients can experience worse preoperative medical optimization. We aimed to determine whether insurance status was associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) urgency and postoperative outcomes. METHODS We analyzed the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative Carotid Endarterectomy dataset from January 2012 to January 2021. Univariable and multivariable methods were used to analyze the differences across the insurance types for the primary outcome variable: CEA urgency. The analyses were limited to patients aged <65 years to minimize age confounding across insurers. We also examined differences in preoperative medical optimization and symptomatic disease and postoperative outcomes. A secondary analysis was performed to examine the effect of CEA urgency on the postoperative outcomes. RESULTS A total of 27,331 patients had undergone first-time CEA. Of these patients, 4600 (17%) had Medicare, 3440 (13%) had Medicaid, 17,917 (65%) had commercial insurance, and 1374 (5%) were uninsured. The Medicaid and uninsured patients had higher rates of urgent operation compared with Medicare (20.0% and 34.7% vs 14.4%; P < .001), with no differences in the commercial group vs the Medicare group. Additionally, Medicaid and uninsured patients had lower rates of aspirin, statin, and/or antiplatelet use (93.6% and 93.5% vs 95.8%; P < .001) and higher rates of symptomatic disease (42.1% and 57.6% vs 36.2%; P < .001) compared with Medicare patients. The rate of perioperative stroke/death was higher for the Medicaid and uninsured patients than for the Medicare patients (1.63% and 1.89% vs 1.02%; P = .017 and P = .01, respectively), with no differences in the commercial group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that compared with Medicare, Medicaid and uninsured status were associated with increased odds of an urgent operation (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.5; and OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.0-2.7, respectively), symptomatic disease (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4; and OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.9-2.5, respectively), and perioperative stroke/death (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.4; and OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0, respectively) and a decreased odds of aspirin, statin, and/or antiplatelet use (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9; and OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.6-0.99, respectively). Additionally, the rates of perioperative stroke/death were higher for patients who had required urgent surgery compared with elective surgery (2.8% vs 1.0%; P < .001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased odds of perioperative stroke/death for patients who had required urgent surgery (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.9-3.1). CONCLUSIONS Medicaid and uninsured patients were more likely to require urgent CEA, in part because of poor preoperative medical optimization. Additionally, urgent operation was independently associated with worse postoperative outcomes. These results highlight the need for improved preoperative follow-up for underinsured populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panpan Chen
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew Lazar
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jessica Ding
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicholas J Morrissey
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|