CCR5 expression on cells from HLA-matched unrelated marrow donors and graft-versus-host disease

Blockade of CCR5 and CXCR3 attenuates murine acute graft-versus-host disease through modulating donor-derived T-cell distribution and function

Lymphocyte trafficking via chemokine receptors such as C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) and CXCR3 plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Our previous studies showed that the addition of CCR5 or CXCR3 antagonists could only slightly alleviate the development of aGVHD. Given the specificity of T lymphocytes bearing CXCR3 and CCR5, we investigated whether combined CCR5 and CXCR3 blockade could further attenuate murine aGVHD. A mouse model of aGVHD was established to assess the efficacy of CCR5 and/or CXCR3 blockade on the development of aGVHD. The distribution of lymphocytes was calculated by quantification of immunostaining cells. The immunomodulatory effect on T cells was assessed by evaluating T-cell proliferation, viability, and differentiation. Using the murine allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation model, we demonstrated that blockade of both CCR5 and CXCR3 could efficiently alleviate the development of aGVHD. Further investigation on the immune mechanisms for this prophylactic effect showed that more T cells were detained into secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs), which may lead to reduced infiltration of T cells into GVHD target organs. Our study also showed that T cells detained in SLOs dampened the activation, suppressed the polarization toward T helper type 1 (Th1) and T cytotoxic type 1 (Tc1) cells, and induced the production of Treg cells. These data suggest that concurrent blockade of CCR5 and CXCR3 attenuates murine aGVHD through modulating donor-derived T-cell distribution and function, and this might be applicable for aGVHD prophylaxis in clinical settings.

γδ T Cells May Aggravate Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Through CXCR4 Signaling After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a pathology in which chemokines and their receptors play essential roles in directing the migration of alloreactive donor T cells into GVHD organs, thereby leading to further target tissue damage. Currently, acute GVHD (aGVHD) remains a major cause of high morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). The identification of immune cells that correlate with aGVHD is important and intriguing. To date, the involvement of innate-like γδ T cells in the pathogenesis of aGVHD is unclear. Herein, we found that primary human γδ T cells did not directly trigger allogeneic reactions. Instead, we revealed that γδ T cells facilitated the migration of CD4 T cells via the SDF-1-CXCR4 axis. These results indicate indirect regulation of γδ T cells in the development of aGVHD rather than a direct mechanism. Furthermore, we showed that the expression of CXCR4 was significantly elevated in γδ T cells and CD4 and CD8 T cells in recipients who experienced grades II-IV aGVHD after alloHCT. Consistently, CXCR4-expressing γδ T cells and CD4 T cells were induced in the target organs of mice suffering aGVHD. The depletion of γδ T cells in transplant grafts and treatment with AMD3100, an inhibitor of CXCR4 signaling, delayed the onset of aGVHD and prolonged survival in mice. Taken together, these findings suggest a role for γδ T cells in recruiting alloreactive CD4 T cells to target tissues through the expression of CXCR4. Our findings may help in understanding the mechanism of aGVHD and provide novel therapeutic targets.

Biomarkers for acute and chronic graft versus host disease: state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant advances in treatment and prevention, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) still represents the main cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Thus, considerable research efforts have been made to find and validate reliable biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification of GVHD.

AREAS COVERED

In this review the most recent evidences on different types of biomarkers studied for GVHD, such as genetic, plasmatic, cellular markers, and those associated with microbiome, were summarized. A comprehensive search of peer-review literature was performed in PubMed including meta-analysis, preclinical and clinical trials, using the terms: cellular and plasma biomarkers, graft-versus-host disease, cytokines, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

EXPERT OPINION

In the near future, several validated biomarkers will be available to help clinicians in the diagnosis of GVHD, the identification of patients at high risk of GVHD development and in patients' stratification according to its severity. Then, immunosuppressive treatment could be tailored to each patient's real needs. However, more efforts are needed to achieve this goal. Although most of the proposed biomarkers currently lack validation with large-scale clinical data, their study led to improved knowledge of the biological basis of GVHD, and ultimately to implementation of GHVD treatment.

The Biological and Clinical Relevance of G Protein-Coupled Receptors to the Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematized Review

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for several malignant and non-malignant diseases at the cost of serious treatment-related toxicities (TRTs). Recent research on extending the benefits of HSCT to more patients and indications has focused on limiting TRTs and improving immunological effects following proper mobilization and engraftment. Increasing numbers of studies report associations between HSCT outcomes and the expression or the manipulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This large family of cell surface receptors is involved in various human diseases. With ever-better knowledge of their crystal structures and signaling dynamics, GPCRs are already the targets for one third of the current therapeutic arsenal. The present paper assesses the current status of animal and human research on GPCRs in the context of selected HSCT outcomes via a systematized survey and analysis of the literature.

Achievement of Tolerance Induction to Prevent Acute Graft-vs.-Host Disease

Acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) limits the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), a main therapy to treat various hematological disorders. Despite rapid progress in understanding GVHD pathogenesis, broad immunosuppressive agents are most often used to prevent and remain the first line of therapy to treat GVHD. Strategies enhancing immune tolerance in allo-HSCT would permit reductions in immunosuppressant use and their associated undesirable side effects. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms responsible for GVHD and advancement in strategies to achieve immune balance and tolerance thereby avoiding GVHD and its complications.

Pharmacodynamic Monitoring Predicts Outcomes of CCR5 Blockade as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis

Blocking lymphocyte trafficking after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a promising strategy to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) while preserving the graft-versus-tumor response. Maraviroc, a CCR5 antagonist, has shown promise in clinical trials, presumably by disrupting the migration of effector cells to GVHD target organs. We describe a phosphoflow assay to quantify CCR5 blockade during treatment with maraviroc and used it to evaluate 28 patients in a phase II study. We found that insufficient blockade of CCR5 was associated with significantly worse overall survival (HR, 10.6; 95% CI, 2.2 to 52.0; P = .004) and higher rates of nonrelapse mortality (HR, 146; 95% CI, 1.0 to 20,600; P = .04) and severe acute GVHD (HR, 12; 95% CI, 1.9 to 76.6; P = .009). In addition, we found that pretransplant high surface expression of CCR5 on recipient T cells predicted higher nonrelapse mortality and worse GVHD- and relapse-free survival. Our results demonstrate that pharmacodynamic monitoring of CCR5 blockade unravels interpatient variability in the response to therapy and may serve as a clinically informative biomarker.

CCR5-edited gene therapies for HIV cure: Closing the door to viral entry

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was first reported and characterized more than three decades ago. Once thought of as a death sentence, HIV infection has become a chronically manageable disease. However, it is estimated that a staggering 0.8% of the world's population is infected with HIV, with more than 1 million deaths reported in 2015 alone. Despite the development of effective anti-retroviral drugs, a permanent cure has only been documented in one patient to date. In 2007, an HIV-positive patient received a bone marrow transplant to treat his leukemia from an individual who was homozygous for a mutation in the CCR5 gene. This mutation, known as CCR5Δ32, prevents HIV replication by inhibiting the early stage of viral entry into cells, resulting in resistance to infection from the majority of HIV isolates. More than 10 years after his last dose of anti-retroviral therapy, the transplant recipient remains free of replication-competent virus. Multiple groups are now attempting to replicate this success through the use of other CCR5-negative donor cell sources. Additionally, developments in the use of lentiviral vectors and targeted nucleases have opened the doors of precision medicine and enabled new treatment methodologies to combat HIV infection through targeted ablation or down-regulation of CCR5 expression. Here, we review historical cases of CCR5-edited cell-based therapies, current clinical trials and future benefits and challenges associated with this technology.

Clinical and immunologic impact of CCR5 blockade in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Lymphocyte trafficking via chemokine receptors such as CCR5 plays a critical role in alloreactive responses, and previous data suggest that CCR5 blockade with maraviroc results in a low incidence of visceral GVHD. However, the full scope of clinical and immunologic effects of CCR5 blockade in HSCT has not been described. We compared a cohort of patients enrolled on a trial of reduced-intensity allo-HSCT with standard GVHD prophylaxis plus maraviroc to a contemporary control cohort receiving standard GVHD prophylaxis alone. Maraviroc treatment was associated with a lower incidence of acute GVHD without increased risk of disease relapse, as well as reduced levels of gut-specific markers. At day 30, maraviroc treatment increased CCR5 expression on T cells and dampened T-cell activation in peripheral blood without impairing early immune reconstitution or increasing risk for infections. Patients who developed acute GVHD despite maraviroc prophylaxis showed increased T-cell activation, naive T-cell skewing, and elevated serum CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels. Collectively, these data suggest that maraviroc effectively protects against GVHD by modulating alloreactive donor T-cell responses, and that CXCR3 signaling may be an important resistance mechanism to CCR5 blockade in GVHD.

A Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Maraviroc as Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients with Nonmalignant Diagnoses

Maraviroc is an allosteric small molecule antagonist of chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) and has been used in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients to prevent acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and liver. The goal of this study was to establish feasibility and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of maraviroc in pediatric HSCT recipients. Children ages 2 to 12 years were enrolled and maraviroc was added to standard GVHD prophylaxis, which included a calcineurin inhibitor and either steroids or mycophenolate mofetil. Maraviroc was started on day -3 and administered at a dose of approximately 300 mg/m(2) orally twice daily until day +30 after stem cell infusion. On days 0 and day +10, samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected before the dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after maraviroc administration. Additional trough concentrations were collected on days +7, 14, and 21. Patients were followed until day +100 for acute GVHD. Functional blockade of CCR5 was assessed in a pharmacodynamic assay by flow cytometry. Thirteen patients, median age of 4 years (range, 2 to 11 years), were prospectively enrolled. Underlying diagnoses included a primary immune deficiency (n = 6), hemoglobinopathy (n = 4), metabolic disorder (n = 1), and bone marrow failure syndrome (n = 2). Patients received either a myeloablative preparative regimen (n = 7) or a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (n = 6). Cyclosporine and methylprednisolone (n = 7) was the predominant GVHD prophylactic regimen, followed by tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 4) and tacrolimus and steroids (n = 2). Two formulations of maraviroc (150-mg tablets and 20-mg/mL solution) were used on study. Mean (± SD) area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours was 4805 ± 3265 hour * ng/mL on day 0 and 5917 ± 4048 hour * ng/mL on day +10. Four patients developed grade 1 or 2 acute skin GVHD before day +100 and were successfully treated. Two patients developed grade 3 acute GI GVHD on days +23 and +24 after HSCT and both had discontinued maraviroc before development of GI GVHD. No adverse effects attributable to maraviroc were observed and administration by enteral tubes was well tolerated by children and accepted by parents. All evaluable patients demonstrated functional CCR5 blockade on day 0. Administration of maraviroc is feasible in most pediatric HSCT recipients with good safety and tolerability profile.

Alterations in chemokine receptor CCR5 expression on blood dendritic cells correlate with acute graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Dendritic cells (DC) are important in the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hemopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). The trafficking of immature DC from blood to GVHD target organs is likely to be regulated by chemokine receptors.

METHODS

We performed flow cytometry to document the expression of chemokine receptors on circulating DC and correlated the findings after alloHCT with occurrence of acute GVHD.

RESULTS

In normal individuals, plasmacytoid DC (pDC) expressed high levels of CCR5, whereas the major CD16 myeloid DC subpopulation lacked CCR5. However, its expression on CD16 cells was induced by culture in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction supernatant, an effect largely mediated by interferon-γ. CCR5 was expressed on a significant proportion of CD16 DC in 42 alloHCT patients, whereas it was down-regulated on pDC. The maximum percentage of CCR5CD16 DC, at any time after transplantation, correlated with acute GVHD, whereas the minimum CCR5 on pDC showed a similar correlation. Before developing signs of GVHD, the maximum percentage CCR5CD16 DC was higher in patients with GVHD grades II to IV than in GVHD grades 0 and I, whereas the minimum percentage CCR5 on pDC was lower in GVHD grades II to IV than in GVHD grades 0 and I. CCR5 levels more than 20.5% on CD16 myeloid DC and less than 22.6% on CD123 pDC correlated with subsequent GVHD grades II to IV with high sensitivities and specificities.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations may reflect DC activation and altered homing during the alloimmune response and could allow early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention before the clinical diagnosis of GVHD.

Blockade of lymphocyte chemotaxis in visceral graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major barrier to successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). The chemokine receptor CCR5 appears to play a role in alloreactivity. We tested whether CCR5 blockade would be safe and limit GVHD in humans.

METHODS

We tested the in vitro effect of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc on lymphocyte function and chemotaxis. We then enrolled 38 high-risk patients in a single-group phase 1 and 2 study of reduced-intensity allogeneic HSCT that combined maraviroc with standard GVHD prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Maraviroc inhibited CCR5 internalization and lymphocyte chemotaxis in vitro without impairing T-cell function or formation of hematopoietic-cell colonies. In 35 patients who could be evaluated, the cumulative incidence rate (±SE) of grade II to IV acute GVHD was low at 14.7±6.2% on day 100 and 23.6±7.4% on day 180. Acute liver and gut GVHD were not observed before day 100 and remained uncommon before day 180, resulting in a low cumulative incidence of grade III or IV GVHD on day 180 (5.9±4.1%). The 1-year rate of death that was not preceded by disease relapse was 11.7±5.6% without excessive rates of relapse or infection. Serum from patients receiving maraviroc prevented CCR5 internalization by CCL5 and blocked T-cell chemotaxis in vitro, providing evidence of antichemotactic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, inhibition of lymphocyte trafficking was a specific and potentially effective new strategy to prevent visceral acute GVHD. (Funded by Pfizer and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00948753.).

The effect of the CCR5-delta32 deletion on global gene expression considering immune response and inflammation

Background

The natural function of the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) is poorly understood. A 32 base pair deletion in the CCR5 gene (CCR5-delta32) located on chromosome 3 results in a non-functional protein. It is supposed that this deletion causes an alteration in T-cell response to inflammation. For example, the presence of the CCR5-delta32 allele in recipients of allografts constitutes as an independent and protective factor associated with a decreased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft rejection. However, the mechanism of this beneficial effect of the deletion regarding GVHD is unknown. In this survey we searched for a CCR5-delta32 associated regulation of critical genes involved in the immune response and the development of GVHD.

Methods

We examined CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells derived from bone marrow samples from 19 healthy volunteers for the CCR5-delta32 deletion with a genomic PCR using primers flanking the site of the deletion.

Results

12 individuals were found to be homozygous for CCR5 WT and 7 carried the CCR5-delta32 deletion heterozygously. Global gene expression analysis led to the identification of 11 differentially regulated genes. Six of them are connected with mechanisms of immune response and control: LRG1, CXCR2, CCRL2, CD6, CD7, WD repeat domain, and CD30L.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that the CCR5-delta32 mutation may be associated with differential gene expression. Some of these genes are critical for immune response, in the case of CD30L probably protective in terms of GVHD.

Chemokine receptor CCR5 mediates alloimmune responses in graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is an effective therapy for hematologic malignancies. However graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major limiting factor for a successful patient outcome. GVHD is a result of alloimmune responses of donor T lymphocytes attacking the recipient's cells and tissues. Chemokine receptor CCR5 plays a role in solid organ allograft rejection and mediates murine GVHD pathogenesis. Herein, we report that infiltrating lymphocytes in the skin of human acute GVHD (aGVHD) samples are predominantly CCR5(+) T cells. In addition, we characterized the features of the CCR5 expression on alloreactive T lymphocytes. We found that the CCR5(+) population exhibits the characteristics of the activated effector T cell phenotype. CCR5 expression is upregulated upon allogenic stimulation, and CCR5(+) cells are proliferating with coexpression of T cell activation markers. Furthermore, the activated T cells producing inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha, interleukin (IL)-2, or interferon (IFN)-gamma, are positive for CCR5. Thus, CCR5 is a marker for GVHD effector cells and CCR5(+) T cells are active participants in the pathogenesis of human aGVHD.