Peripheral Blood CD34+ Cell Enumeration as a Predictor of Apheresis Yield: An Analysis of More Than 1,000 Collections

Peripheral blood stem cell harvesting in young children weighing less than 15 kg

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation is crucial in pediatric cancer treatment, and tandem transplantation is beneficial in certain malignancies. Collecting PBSCs in small children with low body weight is challenging. We retrospectively analyzed data of pediatric cancer patients weighing <15 kg who underwent autologous PBSC harvesting in our hospital. Collections were performed in the pediatric intensive care unit over 2 or 3 consecutive days, to harvest sufficient stem cells (goal ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg per apheresate). From April 2006 to August 2021, we performed 129 collections after 50 mobilizations in 40 patients, with a median age of 1.9 (range, 0.6-5.6) years and a body weight of 11.0 (range, 6.6-14.7) kg. The median CD34+ cells in each apheresate were 4.2 (range, 0.01-40.13) × 106/kg. 78% and 56% of mobilizations achieved sufficient cell dose for single or tandem transplantation, respectively, without additional aliquoting. The preapheresis hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) count was highly correlated with the CD34+ cell yield in the apheresate (r = 0.555, P < 0.001). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone was not effective for mobilization in children ≥2 years of age, even without radiation exposure. By combining the preapheresis HPC count ≥20/μL and the 3 significant host factors, including age <2 years, no radiation exposure and use of chemotherapy, the prediction rate of goal achievement was increased (area under the curve 0.787).

An evidence-based and risk-adapted GSF versus GSF plus plerixafor mobilization strategy to obtain a sufficient CD34+ cell yield in the harvest for autologous stem cell transplants

BACKGROUND

Plerixafor is a bicyclam molecule with the ability to reversibly bind to receptor CXCR-4 thus leading to an increased release of stem cells (SC) into the circulation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of G-CSF plus plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilizing regimens on the basis of CD34+ cell yield and engraftment kinetics following hematopoietic SC transplants.

METHODS

The study incorporated 173 patients with plasma cell neoplasms (PCN), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), undergoing mobilization and following autologous SC-transplant. For patients with mobilization failure and those predicted to be at risk of harvesting inadequate CD34+ yields (poor-responders), plerixafor was administered. Data was collected and compared in relation to the harvesting protocols used, cell quantification, cell-engraftment potential and overall clinical outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients received plerixafor (58.4 %) and the median CD34+increase was 312 %. Chemotherapy-mobilized PCN-patients required less plerixafor administration (p = 0.01), no difference was observed in lymphoma groups (p = 0.46). The median CD34+cell yield was 7.8 × 106/kg bm. Patients requiring plerixafor achieved lower, but still comparable cell yields. Total cell dose infused was in correlation with engraftment kinetics. Patients requiring plerixafor had delayed platelet engraftment (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Adequately selected plerixafor administration reduces "mobilization-related-failure" rate and assure a high-level cell dose for SC transplants, with superior "therapeutic-potential" and safety profile. The mobilization strategy that incorporates "just-in-time" plerixafor administration, also leads to a reduction of hospitalization days and healthcare resource utilization. For definitive conclusions, further controlled/larger clinical trials concerning correlation of CD34+ cell count/yield, with hematopoietic reconstitution are required.

Stem cell mobilizating effect of heparin in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Adequate stem cell collection is essential for successful stem cell transplantation. Heparin enhances stem cell mobilization by competing with heparin sulfate proteoglycans. Heparin is also used as an anticoagulant before leukapheresis. Here, we evaluated the effects of heparin on stem cell mobilization in patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS

We evaluated patients who underwent ASCT. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received heparin plus citrate (heparinized patients) and those who received citrate only (nonheparinized patients) for anticoagulation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed. The collection efficiency 2 (CE2) for CD34+ cells was calculated and compared between heparinized and nonheparinized patients.

RESULTS

This study included 1017 patients. There were 478 (47%) heparinized and 539 (53%) nonheparinized patients. The number of collected CD34+ cells was significantly higher in heparinized patients (P < .00001). The multivariate analyses showed that using heparin was an independent positive factor for collected CD34+ cells (adj-R2  = 0.744; F = 369.331, P < .00001). CE2 was significantly higher in heparinized patients than in nonheparinized patients (66.8% vs 52.1%; P < .00001). The rate of collecting at least 2 × 106 /kg CD34+ cells was 3.3 times higher for heparinized patients in poor mobilizers (P < .00001). Heparinized patients had significantly higher total nucleated and mononuclear cell counts (P < .00001 and <.00001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Heparin enhances stem cell collection and increases CE2. The use of heparin may reduce the need for other strategies to increase stem cell mobilization.

Platelet-derived circulating soluble P-selectin is sufficient to induce hematopoietic stem cell mobilization

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mediated mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is a well-established method to prepare HSCs for transplantation nowadays. A sufficient number of HSCs is critical for successful HSC transplantation. However, approximately 2-6% of healthy stem cell donors are G-CSF-poor mobilizers for unknown reasons; thus increasing the uncertainties of HSC transplantation. The mechanism underlining G-CSF-mediated HSC mobilization remains elusive, so detailed mechanisms and an enhanced HSC mobilization strategy are urgently needed. Evidence suggests that P-selectin and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) are one of the cell-cell adhesion ligand-receptor pairs for HSCs to keep contacting bone marrow (BM) stromal cells before being mobilized into circulation. This study hypothesized that blockage of PSGL-1 and P-selectin may disrupt HSC-stromal cell interaction and facilitate HSC mobilization.

METHODS

The plasma levels of soluble P-selectin (sP-sel) before and after G-CSF administration in humans and male C57BL/6J mice were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Male mice with P-selectin deficiency (Selp-/-) were further employed to investigate whether P-selectin is essential for G-CSF-induced HSC mobilization and determine which cell lineage is sP-sel derived from. Finally, wild-type mice were injected with either G-CSF or recombinant sP-sel to investigate whether sP-sel alone is sufficient for inducing HSC mobilization and whether it accomplishes this by binding to HSCs and disrupting their interaction with stromal cells in the BM.

RESULTS

A significant increase in plasma sP-sel levels was observed in humans and mice following G-CSF administration. Treatments of G-CSF induced a decrease in the level of HSC mobilization in Selp-/- mice compared with the wild-type (Selp+/+) controls. Additionally, the transfer of platelets derived from wild-type mice can ameliorate the defected HSC mobilization in the Selp-/- recipients. G-CSF induces the release of sP-sel from platelets, which is sufficient to mobilize BM HSCs into the circulation of mice by disrupting the PSGL-1 and P-selectin interaction between HSCs and stromal cells. These results collectively suggested that P-selectin is a critical factor for G-CSF-induced HSC mobilization.

CONCLUSIONS

sP-sel was identified as a novel endogenous HSC-mobilizing agent. sP-sel injections achieved a relatively faster and more convenient regimen to mobilize HSCs in mice than G-CSF. These findings may serve as a reference for developing and optimizing human HSC mobilization in the future.

The effect of preemptive use of plerixafor on stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the preemptive use of plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma which was administered as a preemptive single dose to the patients who were determined to have a CD34+ cell count of

Correlation of Body Mass Index and Proinflammatory Cytokine Levels with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization

This study investigated the correlation of body mass index (BMI) and proinflammatory cytokine levels with hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization triggered by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Stem cell donors (n = 309) were recruited between August 2015 and January 2018 and grouped into four groups according to their BMI: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, n = 10), normal (18.5 kg/m2 ≦ BMI < 25 kg/m2, n = 156), overweight (25 kg/m2 ≦ BMI < 30 kg/m2, n = 102), and obese (BMI ≧ 30 kg/m2, n = 41). The participants were then administered with five doses of G-CSF and categorized as good mobilizers (CD34 ≧ 180/μL, n = 15, 4.85%) and poor mobilizers (CD34 ≦ 25/μL, n = 14, 4.53%) according to the number of CD34+ cells in their peripheral blood after G-CSF administration. The correlation between BMI and HSC mobilization was then analyzed, and the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the plasma from good and poor mobilizers were examined by ProcartaPlex Immunoassay. Results showed that BMI was highly correlated with G-CSF-triggered HSC mobilization (R2 = 0.056, p < 0.0001). Compared with poor mobilizers, good mobilizers exhibited higher BMI (p < 0.001) and proinflammatory cytokine [interferon gamma (IFN-γ) (p < 0.05), interleukin-22 (IL-22) (p < 0.05), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels (p < 0.05)]. This study indicated that BMI and proinflammatory cytokine levels are positively correlated with G-CSF-triggered HSC mobilization.

FACTORS INFLUENCING POST- CRYOPRESERVED CD34+ CELLS VIABILITY IN THE HARVESTED PRODUCTS OF AUTOLOGOUS HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS

The cryopreservation process of stem cells potentially cause the loss of CD34+ cells. The aim of this study is to evaluate association of patient, graft and technical characteristics with post cryopreserved CD34+ cells viability among lymphoproliferative disease namely multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). This retrospective study was conducted in the Transplant Unit. A search of the hospital data (2008-2018) to identify 132 patients for both MM and lymphoma who underwent autologous peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cells (APBSC) mobilisation, and were successfully harvested and cryopreserved. Selected patients' profile as well as selected parameters of stem cell mobilization and cryopreservation were obtained from laboratory information system (LIS), record unit and the Transplant Unit. Multiple logistic regression (MLR) was used to find significant associated factors and p <0.05 was considered significant. The mean age of the patients was 39 years old with almost equal gender distribution and majority were lymphoma patients, 96 (72.7%) while 36 (27.3%) were multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The significant influencing factors of post-cryopreserved CD34+ cells viability were pre-cryopreserved CD34+ cell viability, total nucleated cells (TNC), and anti-platelet and antibiotics usage. Patients who are not on anti-platelet and have higher pre-cryopreserved CD34+ cells viability have higher chance for good post-cryopreserved CD34+ cells viability. While, those patients with higher TNC and on antibiotics have lower chance for good post cryopreserved CD34+ cells viability. This study showed patients who are not on anti-platelet and antibiotics will have higher probability of achieving good post cryopreserved CD34+ cells viability. The APBSC products with higher pre-cryopreserved CD34+ cells viability and lower TNC will achieve better post-cryopreserved CD34+ cells viability. The addition of extra plasma to the APBSC products is recommended to reduce the TNC.

Hematopoietic progenitor cell counting can optimize peripheral blood stem cell apheresis process

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring of stem cell concentration in transplantation settings is crucial to determine the optimal time of apheresis and is currently based on enumeration of CD34+ cells by flow cytometry. No surrogate marker has replaced CD34+ cell enumeration to date. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) parameter of the Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer in terms of optimizing the peripheral blood stem cell apheresis process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results of flow cytometric CD34+ cell and Sysmex HPC count were compared in 208 preharvest samples and 139 apheresis products.

RESULTS

HPC and CD34+ cell counts showed significant differences in the multiple myeloma (MM) group. The correlation between preharvest HPC and CD34+ cell counts was good in the MM group (rho = .613) and strong in the lymphoma group (rho = .802), allogeneic donors (rho = .923), and other group of samples (rho = .816). The HPC positive cutoff demonstrating 100% specificity and positive predictive value for MM patients was high for ≥20/μL and ≥10/μL CD34+ cell counts, and therefore of limited value. The HPC negative cutoff demonstrating 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value was approximately <4/μL, irrespective of diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on proposed HPC positive cutoffs (≥31/μL in the lymphoma group and ≥11/μL in the other group of samples), routine HPC enumeration could improve the workflow by replacing CD34+ cell counting in allogeneic donors as well as non-MM patients. Furthermore, based on proposed HPC negative cutoff (<4/μL), CD34+ cell counting could be fully omitted in donors and patients that are not adequately mobilized.

Optimizing leukapheresis product yield and purity for blood cell-based gene and immune effector cell therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A critical common step for blood-based ex-vivo gene and immune effector cell (IEC) therapies is the collection of target cells for further processing and manufacturing, often accomplished through a leukapheresis procedure to collect mononuclear cells (MNCs). The purpose of this review is to describe strategies to optimize the apheresis product cell yield and purity for gene and IEC therapies. Relevant data from the conventional bone marrow transplant literature is described where applicable.

RECENT FINDINGS

Product yield is affected by three main factors: the peripheral blood concentration of the target cell, optimized by mobilizing agents, donor interventions or donor selection; the volume of peripheral blood processed, tailored to the desired product yield using prediction algorithms; and target cell collection efficiency, optimized by a variety of device and donor-specific considerations. Factors affecting product purity include characteristics of the donor, mobilizing agent, device, and device settings.

SUMMARY

Strategies to optimize product yield and purity for gene and IEC therapies are important to consider because of loss of target cell numbers or function with downstream steps and detrimental effects of nontarget cells on further manufacturing and patient outcome.

Successful autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection using large volume leukapheresis in patients with very low or undetectable peripheral blood CD34+ progenitor cells

Autologous stem cell transplantation provides some patients with hematolymphoid and solid organ malignancies an opportunity for cure. Management of peripheral hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collections differs among institutions, especially if a very low pre-procedure peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (PBCD34) is demonstrated. This study retrospectively analyzed results of large-volume peripheral HSC collections in 91 patients over approximately two years. Fifteen patients with PBCD34 < 10 × 10e6/l (eleven with undetectable PBCD34) were compared to 76 patients with higher counts on the first collection day (adequate mobilizers). The poor mobilizer group had significantly lower pre-collection WBC and platelet counts as well as collection yields. However, most patients with PBCD34 < 10 × 10e6/l (80 %) collected the minimum target for HSC transplant (2.0 × 10e6 CD34+ cells/kg) in <5 consecutive days of collection, and those who did collect the minimum successfully underwent autologous transplantation, with hematopoietic engraftment and long-term survival comparable to the adequate mobilizers. Successful HSC collection may often be achieved regardless of d 1 PBCD34 counts.

Potentially modifiable predictors of cell collection efficiencies and product characteristics of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell collections

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) and immune effector cell (IEC) therapies often require high doses of mononuclear cells (MNCs), whether CD34+ cells, lymphocytes, or monocytes. Cells for IEC can be sourced from HPC products. We thus examined potentially modifiable variables affecting collection efficiencies (CEs) of MNC subsets in HPC collection and also of the typically undesired cell types of platelets, granulocytes, and red cells, which hinder downstream processing. Finally, we sought to confirm previously indeterminate studies of the effect of an adjusted collect flow rate (CFR) on CD34+ CE.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses of all 135 National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) HPC collections in 2019 and compared these fixed CFR procedures to previous NMDP collections using adjusted CFRs.

RESULTS

Target cell CEs decreased with increasing peripheral blood (PB) concentration and were associated with different cell type locations within the MNC layer. CEs of undesired cell types varied with standard procedural parameters (inlet flow rate, whole blood processed, etc.). Interestingly, some CEs increased with preapheresis hematocrit. Finally, adjusting the CFR by PB MNC count improved MNC CE but not CD34+ CE.

CONCLUSION

Correlation of target cell CEs with their PB concentration and different cell type locations by depth within the MNC layer indicates the importance of investigating the compensatory fine-tuning of procedure variables to improve CE. Correlation of CEs with PB hematocrit, and CFR adjustment by a modified PB MNC and/or PB CD34 algorithm should be further explored. Adjusting standard procedural parameters may reduce product contamination.

Notch-HEY2 signaling pathway contributes to the differentiation of CD34+ hematopoietic-like stem cells from adult peripheral blood insulin-producing cells after the treatment with platelet-derived mitochondria

Previous works characterized a novel cell population from adult human peripheral blood, designated peripheral blood insulin-producing cells (PB-IPC). PB-IPC displayed the pluripotent potential of differentiations after the treatment with platelet-derived mitochondria and gave rise to three germ layer-derived cells such as the mitochondrion-induced CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC)-like cells (miCD34⁺ HSC). To determine the molecular mechanism underlying the differentiation of miCD34⁺ cells, mechanistic studies established that MitoTracker Deep Red-labeled mitochondria could enter into the PB-IPC in a dose-dependent manner. Blocking Notch signaling pathway with a γ-secretase inhibitor, DAPT, markedly inhibited the proliferation of PB-IPC and improved the differentiation of miCD34⁺ HSC. Additionally, treatment with platelet-derived mitochondria can reprogram the differentiation of PB-IPC into miCD34⁺ HSC through inhibition of the Notch/HEY2 signaling pathway, as demonstrated by blocking experiments with HEY2 small interfering RNA (siRNA). The data indicated that Notch signaling pathway contributes to the miCD34⁺ HSC differentiation, thus advancing our understanding of the mitochondrial reprogramming and the potential treatment of human hematopoietic disease.

Generation of Hematopoietic-Like Stem Cells from Adult Human Peripheral Blood Following Treatment with Platelet-Derived Mitochondria

Adult stem cells represent a potential source for cellular therapy to treat serious human diseases. We characterized the insulin-producing cells from adult peripheral blood (designated PB-IPC), which displayed a unique phenotype. Mitochondria are normally located in the cellular cytoplasm, where they generate ATP to power the cell’s functions. Ex vivo and in vivo functional studies established that treatment with platelet-derived mitochondria can reprogram the transformation of adult PB-IPC into functional CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC)-like cells, leading to the production of blood cells such as T cells, B cells, monocytes/macrophages, granulocytes, red blood cells, and megakaryocytes (MKs)/platelets. These findings revealed a novel function of mitochondria in directly contributing to cellular reprogramming, thus overcoming the limitations and safety concerns of using conventional technologies to reprogram embryonic stem (ES) and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells in regenerative medicine.

Efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization following gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin (GDP) salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a cornerstone of treatment in relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive-histology lymphomas. This retrospective study examined efficacy and safety of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization using cyclophosphamide/etoposide and GCSF (CE + GCSF, n = 129) versus gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin and GCSF (GDP + GCSF, n = 210). All patients received first salvage with GDP. Patients mobilized with CE + GCSF required fewer days of leukapheresis (median 1 vs 2 day; p = .001) and achieved higher total CD34+ yield than GDP + GCSF patients (8.5 vs 7.1 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg, p = .001). Rates of febrile neutropenia and CD34+ collection ≥5 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg were similar (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.54-2.6, p = .66). In multivariable analysis, days to engraftment and admission duration were not statistically different between the two mobilization strategies. While CE + GCSF appeared more efficacious for mobilization after GDP salvage, this did not translate to significant differences in clinical outcomes.

Optimized peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in children with high-risk and refractory malignancies

BACKGROUND

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) using hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) has become an important therapeutic modality for patients with high-risk malignancies. Current literature on standardized method for HPC apheresis in children is sparse and failure rate reported as high as 30%.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A retrospective study of 125 pediatric patients with high-risk malignancies undergoing aHSCT in Western Australia between 1997 and 2016 was conducted.

RESULTS

Mobilization was achieved by means of chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients underwent apheresis the day after CD34⁺ counts reached ≥20/µL and an additional dose of G-CSF. Peripheral arterial and intravenous lines were inserted in pediatric intensive care unit under local anesthetic and/or sedation, omitting the need for general anesthesia as well as facilitating an uninterrupted apheresis flow. Larger apheresis total blood volumes were processed in patients weighing ≤20 kg. The minimal dose of ≥2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg was successfully collected in 98.4% of all patients. The optimal dose of 3-5 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg was collected in 96% of patients scheduled for a single aHSCT, 87.5% for tandem, and 100% for triple aHSCT. All HPC collections were completed in one apheresis session. Mobilization after ≤3 chemotherapy cycles and cycles including cyclophosphamide resulted in a significantly higher yield of CD34⁺ cells.

CONCLUSION

Our approach to HPC mobilization by means of chemotherapy and single myeloid growth factor combined with optimal collection timing facilitated by continuous apheresis flow resulted in highly effective HPC harvest in children and adolescents with high-risk cancers.

Mobilization and collection of cells in the hematologic compartment for cellular therapies: Stem cell collection with G-CSF/plerixafor, collecting lymphocytes/monocytes

An essential and influential first step in all cellular therapies is collecting donor or patient cells. In hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) are collected from either the bone marrow or the peripheral blood. Peripheral blood collection by apheresis requires mobilization with chemotherapy, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), plerixafor, or a combination. The modalities of mobilization and collection each carry a unique set of risks and benefits for both the donor and the recipient. In other types of cell therapy, most notably chimeric antigen receptor T cells, lymphocytes or monocytes are collected from the peripheral blood. The risks of collecting these cells by apheresis are similar to HPCs, but less is known about the composition, timing and qualitative cell characteristics which contribute to an optimal collection. Here, we review the mobilization and collection of HPCs and the collection of lymphocytes and monocytes. Donor safety is of primary importance when collecting material for any type of cell therapy. Every aspect of mobilization and collection can be studied and potentially optimized to improve patient outcomes.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of lenograstim for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: a prospective randomized study for optimal apheresis

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the correlation between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) and the impact of initiation time of apheresis on stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with multiple myeloma were randomized into one of the two groups (early vs. late). Lenograstim at 10 μg/kg/day once daily was injected for at least 4 consecutive days. Apheresis was initiated 2 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim in the early collection group and 16 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim in the late collection group. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetics was performed within 30 minutes before, and 1, 2, 6, and 24 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim.

RESULTS

Overall, the two groups (early vs. late, n = 10 vs. 14) exhibited similar baseline characteristics including age, sex, subtype of myeloma, stage distribution, and myeloma-associated symptoms. No correlation was found between plasma lenograstim concentration and peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell counts or hematopoietic progenitor cells. In the late collection group, the median number of apheresis procedures for minimal collection was significantly lower (early vs. late: 2 vs. 1; p = 0.04) and there was a higher number of total collected PB CD34+ cells in a single session of apheresis (1.4 vs. 3.1; p = 0.06). There were no differences in median overall PB stem cell collection efficiency.

CONCLUSION

Late collection positively impacted the number of apheresis procedures for minimal collection, with numerically improved PB stem cell collection efficiency at first apheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.

Evaluation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell collection by leukapheresis

BACKGROUND

Adoptive immunotherapy using engineered lymphocytes has shown promising results in treating cancers even in patients who have failed other treatments. As the first essential step, the number of peripheral mononuclear cell (MNC) collection procedures is rapidly increasing. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the collection results to determine factors that affect MNC collection.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed 184 collections that were performed on 169 adult allogenic donors and patients with acute lymphoid leukemia, chronic lymphoid leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or solid-organ tumors. All the leukapheresis procedures were performed after a complete cell count with differential was obtained. Total blood volume (TBV) was defined as processed blood volume divided by patient blood volume.

RESULTS

There was a significant association between the precollection MNC count (pre-MNC) and the MNC yields normalized by TBV (r = 0.926; p < 0.001) and a regression formula was created to predict MNC yields. Multiple regression analyses showed that pre-MNC, TBV, and precollection hemoglobin were strongly associated with MNC yield (R ² = 0.866; F (3180) = 388.472; p < 0.001), and pre-MNC had the greatest influence on MNC yield (β = 0.960; p < 0.001) followed by TBV (β = 0.302; p < 0.001), and Hgb (β = 0.136; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the optimal time for MNC collection can be determined based on pre-MNC and that processing volume should be determined based on collection goal and pre-MNC to optimize and personalize the harvesting procedure.

Human primary CD34+ cells transplantation for critical limb ischemia

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to characterize the properties of human CD34⁺ cells in culture and investigate the feasibility and efficacy of CD34⁺ transplantation in a mouse model of limb ischemia and in patients with no-option critical limb ischemia.

METHODS

Human CD34⁺ cells isolated from peripheral blood and grown in culture for up to four passages stained positively for the surface markers CD34 and CD133 and showed high viability after cryopreservation and recovery. Seven days after surgery to induce limb ischemia, ischemic muscles of nude mice were injected with CD34⁺ cells. Two weeks later, mice were scored for extent of ischemic injury, and muscle tissue was collected for immunohistochemical analysis of vascular endothelial cells and RT-PCR analysis of cytokine expression.

RESULTS

Injury scores of CD34⁺ -treated, but not control, mice were significantly different before and after transplantation. Vascular density and expression of VEGF and bFGF mRNAs were also significantly increased in the treated mice. Patients with severe lower extremity arterial ischemia were injected with their own CD34⁺ cells in the affected calf, foot, or toe. Significant improvements were observed in peak pain-free walking time, ankle-brachial index, and transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure. These findings demonstrate that growth of human CD34⁺ cells in vitro and cryopreservations are feasible.

CONCLUSION

Such cells may provide a renewable source of stem cells for transplantation, which appears to be a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for patients with critical limb ischemia.

Significant correlation between peripheral blood CD34+ cell count in children prior to aphaeresis and CD34+ cell yield following aphaeresis: A single-center experience

Numerous adults' studies demonstrated that preaphaeresis CD34+ cells significantly correlate with the number of CD34+ cells collected by the aphaeresis procedure. Equivalent studies in children are scarce. We studied retrospectively 92 aphaeresis procedures performed following chemotherapy (44) or in steady state (48) in 60 pediatric patients (40 males, 20 females), median age of 7.5 years. Aphaeresis procedures were performed using a SPECTRA Optica (TERUMOBCT) continuous flow cell separator. CD34+ cell concentrations were assessed using flow cytometry. A highly significant correlation between peripheral CD34 cell count on the day of aphaeresis and CD34 cell yield per kg (R²  = .824, P < .0001) was demonstrated. A higher preaphaeresis CD34 cell count was demonstrated in patients with higher preaphaeresis white blood cell count, in patients with brain tumors, and in patients who received chemotherapy as part of their mobilization protocol. A threshold number of 20 peripheral CD34+ cell/μL was found to predict harvesting of 3 × 10⁶ stem cells/kg, and 30 peripheral CD34+ cell/μL for harvesting of 5 × 10⁶ stem cells/kg. This significant correlation between peripheral CD34 cell count and CD34 cell yield, and the threshold number of peripheral CD34 found to predict adequate harvesting can be useful in planning the optimal time for aphaeresis in children.

Predicting failure of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before it starts: the predicted poor mobilizer (pPM) score

Predicting mobilization failure before it starts may enable patient-tailored strategies. Although consensus criteria for predicted PM (pPM) are available, their predictive performance has never been measured on real data. We retrospectively collected and analyzed 1318 mobilization procedures performed for MM and lymphoma patients in the plerixafor era. In our sample, 180/1318 (13.7%) were PM. The score resulting from published pPM criteria had sufficient performance for predicting PM, as measured by AUC (0.67, 95%CI: 0.63-0.72). We developed a new prediction model from multivariate analysis whose score (pPM-score) resulted in better AUC (0.80, 95%CI: 0.76-0.84, p < 0001). pPM-score included as risk factors: increasing age, diagnosis of NHL, positive bone marrow biopsy or cytopenias before mobilization, previous mobilization failure, priming strategy with G-CSF alone, or without upfront plerixafor. A simplified version of pPM-score was categorized using a cut-off to maximize positive likelihood ratio (15.7, 95%CI: 9.9-24.8); specificity was 98% (95%CI: 97-98.7%), sensitivity 31.7% (95%CI: 24.9-39%); positive predictive value in our sample was 71.3% (95%CI: 60-80.8%). Simplified pPM-score can "rule in" patients at very high risk for PM before starting mobilization, allowing changes in clinical management, such as choice of alternative priming strategies, to avoid highly likely mobilization failure.

Management of mobilization failure in 2017

In contemporary clinical practice, almost all allogeneic transplantations and autologous transplantations now capitalize on peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) as opposed to bone marrow (BM) for the source of stem cells. In this context, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plays a pivotal role as the most frequently applied frontline agent for stem cell mobilization. For patients classified as high-risk, chemotherapy based mobilization regimens can be preferred as a first choice and it is notable that this also used for remobilization. Mobilization failure occurs at a rate of 10%-40% with traditional strategies and it typically leads to low-efficiency practices, resource wastage, and delayed in treatment intervention. Notably, however, several factors can impact the effectiveness of CD34⁺ progenitor cell mobilization, including patient age and medical history (prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, disease and marrow infiltration at the time of mobilization). In recent years, main (yet largely ineffective) approach was to increase G-CSF dose and add SCF, but novel and promising pathways have been opened up by the synergistic impact of a reversible inhibitor of CXCR4, plerixafor, with G-CSF. The literature shows to its favorable results in upfront and failed mobilizers, and it is necessary to use plerixafor (or equivalent agents) to optimize HSC harvest in poor mobilizers. Different CXCR4 inhibitors, growth hormone, VLA4 inhibitors, and parathormone, have been cited as new agents for mobilization failure in recent years. In view of the above considerations, the purpose of this paper is to examine the mobilization of PBSC while focusing specifically on poor mobilizers.

[Absolute numbers of peripheral blood CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells prior to a leukapheresis procedure as a parameter predicting the efficiency of stem cell collection]

AIM

To identify a parameter predicting a collection of at least 2·106 CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC)/kg body weight per leukapheresis (LA) procedure.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The investigation included 189 patients with hematological malignancies and 3 HSC donors, who underwent mobilization of stem cells with their subsequent collection by LA. Absolute numbers of peripheral blood leukocytes and CD34+ cells before a LA procedure, as well as a number of CD34+ cells/kg body weight (BW) in the LA product stored on the same day were determined in each patient (donor).

RESULTS

There was no correlation between the number of leukocytes and that of stored CD34+ cells/kg BW. There was a close correlation between the count of peripheral blood CD34+ cells prior to LA and that of collected CD34+ cells calculated with reference to kg BW.

CONCLUSION

The optimal absolute blood CD34+ cell count was estimated to 20 per µl, at which a LA procedure makes it possible to collect 2·106 or more CD34+ cells/kg BW.

Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization and Collection

Peripheral blood stem cell collection is an effective approach to obtain a hematopoietic graft for stem cell transplantation. Developing hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization methods and collection algorithms have improved efficiency, clinical outcomes, and cost effectiveness. Differences in mobilization mechanisms may change the HSPC content harvested and result in different engraftment kinetics and complications. Patient-specific factors can affect mobilization. Incorporating these factors in collection algorithms and improving assays for evaluating mobilization further extend the ability to obtain sufficient HSPCs for hematopoietic repopulation. Technological advance and innovations in leukapheresis have improved collection efficiency and reduced adverse effects.

Use of allogeneic apheresis stem cell products as an interlaboratory proficiency challenge

BACKGROUND

AABB Standards requires that laboratories participate in a proficiency test (PT) program for critical analytes. Institutions can purchase commercial PT materials; however, PT can also be performed through interlaboratory exchange. We investigated the utility of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell apheresis (HPC-A) products as an interlaboratory PT challenge for total nucleated cell count (TNC) and CD34 assessment.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Three-year retrospective and comparative review of unrelated allogeneic HPC-A products received by the University of Michigan between January 2011 and December 2013. Internal TNC and CD34 count were compared to the external collecting facility by paired t test and linear regression. The absolute and percent difference between external and internal counts and 95% limits of agreeability (95% LA) were determined. Results were analyzed relative to donor center location (international, domestic), time zone (domestic), and calendar year.

RESULTS

There was a strong correlation between internal and external TNC, regardless of donor center location or year. For CD34, there was a good correlation between centers (R = 0.88-0.91; slope = 0.95-0.98x) with a median difference of -1% (95% LA, -50%, +47%). This was considerably better than commercial PT challenges, which showed a persistent negative bias for absolute CD34 and CD3 counts.

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic HPC-A products represent an interlaboratory PT exchange for all critical analytes, including TNC and CD34 count, cell viability, and sterility. Allogeneic HPC-A products, which are fresh and transported under validated conditions, are less subject to preanalytical variables that may impact commercial PT samples such as aliquoting and sample homogeneity, commercial additives, and sample stability during manufacturing and transport.

Poor stem cell harvest may not always be related to poor mobilization: lessons gained from a mobilization study in patients with β-thalassemia major

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and leukapheresis in adult patients with β-thalassemia have recently been optimized in the context of clinical trials for obtaining hematopoietic stem cells for thalassemia gene therapy. In some patients, however, the yield of cluster of differentiation 34-positive (CD34+) cells was poor despite successful mobilization, and a modification of apheresis settings was mandatory for harvest rescue.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were analyzed from 20 adult patients with β-thalassemia who were enrolled in a clinical trial of optimizing mobilization strategies for stem cell gene therapy. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to assess how certain hematological and/or clinical parameters may correlate with low collection efficiency in the presence of adequate numbers of circulating stem cells after pharmacological mobilization and standard leukapheresis procedures.

RESULTS

Among 19 patients who achieved optimal mobilization with Plerixafor, four who underwent splenectomy demonstrated disproportionately poor CD34+ cell harvests, as determined by their circulating CD34+ cell counts after mobilization. All four patients who underwent splenectomy presented at baseline and before first apheresis with lymphocytosis resulting in lymphocyte/neutrophil ratios well above 1 and marked reticulocytosis compared with patients who achieved optimal mobilization/CD34+ cell harvest. Such unexpected expansion of specific cell populations disrupted the normal cell layer separation and necessitated modification of the apheresis settings to rescue the harvests.

CONCLUSIONS

By close examination of certain hematological and/or clinical parameters before leukapheresis, patients who, despite adequate mobilization, are at risk for poor CD34+ cell harvests may be identified, and harvest failure can be prevented by adjusting the apheresis settings.

How to manage poor mobilizers for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation?

Today, peripheral blood stem cells are the preferred source of stem cells over bone marrow. Therefore, mobilization plays a crutial role in successful autologous stem cell transplantation. Poor mobilization is generally defined as failure to achieve the target level of at least 2×10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg body weight. There are several strategies to overcome poor mobilization: 1) Larger volume Leukapheresis (LVL) 2) Re-mobilization 3) Plerixafor 4) CM+Plerixafor (P)+G-CSF and 5) Bone Marrow Harvest. In this review, the definitions of successful and poor mobilization are discussed. Management strategies for poor mobilization are defined. The recent research on new agents are included.

How do we mobilize and collect autologous peripheral blood stem cells?

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) has become a widely applied therapeutic approach for many hematologic and nonhematologic diseases. Adequate PBSC mobilization is critical to the success of ASCT. However, many factors can contribute to poor mobilization. Plerixafor is an effective yet costly adjunct agent that has been increasingly used to improve mobilization in a variety of diagnoses and clinical settings. However, to achieve both optimal cell collection yields and cost-effectiveness, the role of plerixafor in PBSC mobilization needs to be well defined in terms of triggers for initiating its use and criteria for monitoring response. As one of the largest hematopoietic transplant centers in the country, we have developed an approach to PBSC mobilization and collection that incorporates patient laboratory assessments, monitoring of the collection yields, and judicious use of plerixafor as well as various patient support and education programs. These measures have resulted in an increase in our collection success rate and a decrease in the mean number of collection days. In this article we describe our approach to autologous PBSC mobilization and collection. Pertinent reports in the literature are also reviewed and discussed.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell harvest: Collection efficiency and factors affecting it

BACKGROUND

Harvest of hematopoietic progenitor cells via leukapheresis is being used increasingly for transplants in India. Adequate yield of cells per kilogram body weight of recipient is required for successful engraftment. Collection efficiency (CE) is an objective quality parameter used to assess the quality of leukapheresis program. In this study, we calculated the CE of the ComTec cell separator (Fresenius Kabi, Germany) using two different formulae (CE1 and CE2) and analyzed various patient and procedural factors, which may affect it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and one consecutive procedures in 77 autologous donors carried out over 3 years period were retrospectively reviewed. Various characteristics like gender, age, weight, disease status, hematocrit, preprocedure total leukocyte count, preprocedure CD34 positive (CD34+) cells count, preprocedure absolute CD34+ cell count and processed apheresis volume effect on CE were compared. CE for each procedure was calculated using two different formulae, and results were compared using statistical correlation and regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean CE1 and CE2 was 41.2 and 49.1, respectively. CE2 appeared to be more accurate indicator of overall CE as it considered the impact of continued mobilization of stem cells during apheresis procedure, itself. Of all the factors affecting CE, preprocedure absolute CD34+ was the only independent factor affecting CE.

CONCLUSION

The only factor affecting CE was preprocedure absolute CD34+ cells. Though the mean CE2 was higher than CE1, it was not statistically significant.

Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use

BACKGROUND AIMS

Hematopoietic cell mobilization with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor results in superior CD34+ cell yield compared with G-CSF alone in patients with myeloma and lymphoma. However, plerixafor-based approaches may be associated with high costs. Several institutions use a "just-in-time" plerixafor approach, in which plerixafor is only administered to patients likely to fail mobilization with G-CSF alone. Whether such an approach is cost-effective is unknown.

METHODS

We evaluated 136 patients with myeloma or lymphoma who underwent mobilization with 2 approaches of plerixafor utilization. Between January 2010 and October 2012, 76 patients uniformly received mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor. Between November 2012 and June 2014, 60 patients were mobilized with plerixafor administered only to those patients likely to fail mobilization with G-CSF alone.

RESULTS

The routine plerixafor group had a higher median peak peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (62 versus 29 cells/μL, P < 0.001) and a higher median day 1 CD34+ yield (2.9 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg versus 2.1 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, P = 0.001). The median total CD34+ collection was higher with routine plerixafor use (5.8 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg versus 4.5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, P = 0.007). In the "just-in-time" group, 40% (n = 24) completed adequate collection without plerixafor. There was no difference in mobilization failure rates. The mean plerixafor doses used was lower with "just-in-time" approach (1.3 versus 2.1, P = 0.0002). The mean estimated cost in the routine plerixafor group was higher (USD 27,513 versus USD 23,597, P = 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Our analysis demonstrates that mobilization with a just-in-time plerixafor approach is a safe, effective, and cost-efficient strategy for HPC collection.

The current status in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization

Hemotopoietic stem cell mobilization with cytokines alone, has still been widely accepted as the initial attempt for stem cell mobilization. Chemotherapy based mobilization can be preferred as first choice in high risk patients or for remobilization. But mobilization failure still remains to be a problem in one third of patients. Salvage mobilization strategies have been composed to give one more chance to 'poor mobilizers'. Synergistic effect of a reversible inhibitor of CXCR4, plerixafor, with G-CSF has opened a new era for these patients. Preemptive approach in predicted poor mobilizers, immediate salvage approach for patients with suboptimal mobilization or remobilization approach of plerixafor in failed mobilizers have all been demonstrated convincing results in various studies. Alternative CXCR4 inhibitors, VLA4 inhibitors, bortezomib, parathormone have also been emerged as novel agents for mobilization failure.

Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: consensus guidelines and recommendations

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a well-established treatment for malignancies such as multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphomas. Various changes in the field over the past decade, including the frequent use of tandem aHSCT in MM, the advent of novel therapies for the treatment of MM and lymphoma, and the addition of new stem cell mobilization techniques, have led to the need to reassess current stem cell mobilization strategies. Mobilization failures with traditional strategies are common and result in delays in treatment and increased cost and resource utilization. Recently, plerixafor-containing strategies have been shown to significantly reduce mobilization failure rates, but the ideal method to maximize stem cell yields and minimize costs associated with collection has not yet been determined. A panel of experts convened to discuss the currently available data on autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and transplantation and to devise guidelines to optimize mobilization strategies. Herein is a summary of their discussion and consensus.