CD20-targeted T cells after stem cell transplantation for high risk and refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Looking ahead to CD3, T-cell engager bispecific antibodies for hematological malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Since the approval of the bispecific antibody blinatumomab in 2017 for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse, the development of numerous bispecific antibody constructs has dramatically expanded in hematologic malignancies. Many have recently received Food Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approvals in various stages of treatment for lymphomas, leukemias, and multiple myeloma.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of bispecific antibody treatment including the mechanisms leading to effector T cells targeting tumor-associated antigens, the treatment indications, efficacies, toxicities, and challenges of the different constructs. A literature search was performed through access to PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

While there has been substantial success in the treatment of NHL, MM, and ALL, there are still hematologic malignancies such as AML where there has been limited progress. It is important to continue to investigate new designs, tumor antigen targets, and further refine where current approved bispecific antibodies fit in terms of sequencing of therapy. Hopefully, with the knowledge gained in recent years and the explosion of these therapies, patients with blood cancers will continue to benefit from these treatments for years to come.

Targeting refractory/recurrent neuroblastoma and osteosarcoma with anti-CD3×anti-GD2 bispecific antibody armed T cells

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit observed in children with neuroblastoma (NB) and minimal residual disease who received treatment with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies prompted our investigation into the safety and potential clinical benefits of anti-CD3×anti-GD2 bispecific antibody (GD2Bi) armed T cells (GD2BATs). Preclinical studies demonstrated the high cytotoxicity of GD2BATs against GD2+cell lines, leading to the initiation of a phase I/II study in recurrent/refractory patients.

METHODS

The 3+3 dose escalation phase I study (NCT02173093) encompassed nine evaluable patients with NB (n=5), osteosarcoma (n=3), and desmoplastic small round cell tumors (n=1). Patients received twice-weekly infusions of GD2BATs at 40, 80, or 160×106 GD2BATs/kg/infusion complemented by daily interleukin-2 (300,000 IU/m2) and twice-weekly granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (250 µg/m2). The phase II segment focused on patients with NB at the dose 3 level of 160×106 GD2BATs/kg/infusion.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients enrolled, 9 completed therapy in phase I with no dose-limiting toxicities. Mild and manageable cytokine release syndrome occurred in all patients, presenting as grade 2-3 fevers/chills, headaches, and occasional hypotension up to 72 hours after GD2BAT infusions. GD2-antibody-associated pain was minimal. Median overall survival (OS) for phase I and the limited phase II was 18.0 and 31.2 months, respectively, with a combined OS of 21.1 months. A phase I NB patient had a complete bone marrow response with overall stable disease. In phase II, 10 of 12 patients were evaluable: 1 achieved partial response, and 3 showed clinical benefit with prolonged stable disease. Over 50% of evaluable patients exhibited augmented immune responses to GD2+targets post-GD2BATs, as indicated by interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) EliSpots, Th1 cytokines, and/or chemokines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety of GD2BATs up to 160×106 cells/kg/infusion. Coupled with evidence of post-treatment endogenous immune responses, our findings support further investigation of GD2BATs in larger phase II clinical trials.

Dose-finding based on feasibility and late-onset toxicity in adoptive cell therapy trials

Cell therapies comprise one of the most important advances in oncology. One of the biggest challenges in the early development of cell therapies is to recommend safe and feasible doses to carry forward to middle development. The treatment involves extracting cells from a patient, expanding the cells and infusing the cells back into the patient. Each dose level being studied is defined by the number of cells infused into the trial participant. The manufacturing process may not generate enough cells for a given patient to receive their assigned dose level, making it infeasible to administer their intended dose. The primary design challenge is to efficiently use accumulated data from participants treated away from their assigned dose to efficiently allocate future trial participants and recommend a feasible maximum tolerated dose (FMTD) at the study conclusion. Currently, there are few available options for designing and implementing Phase I trials of cell therapies that can incorporate a dose feasibility endpoint. Moreover, the application of these designs is limited to a traditional dose-finding framework, where the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) endpoint is observed in early cycles of therapy. This paper presents a novel phase I trial design for adoptive cell therapy that simultaneously accounts for dose feasibility and late-onset toxicities. We apply our design to a phase I dose-escalation trial of Rituximab-based bispecific activated T-cells combined with a fixed dose of Nivolumab. Our simulation results demonstrate that our proposed method can reduce trial duration without significantly hindering trial accuracy.

Targeting GD2-positive Refractory/Resistant Neuroblastoma and Osteosarcoma with Anti- CD3 x Anti-GD2 Bispecific Antibody Armed T cells

Background

Since treatment of neuroblastoma (NB) with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies provides a survival benefit in children with minimal residual disease and our preclinical study shows that anti-CD3 x anti-GD2 bispecific antibody (GD2Bi) armed T cells (GD2BATs) were highly cytotoxic to GD2+ cell lines, we conducted a phase I/II study in recurrent/refractory patients to establish safety and explore the clinical benefit of GD2BATs.

Methods

The 3+3 dose escalation study (NCT02173093) phase I involved 9 evaluable patients with NB (n=5), osteosarcoma (OST) (n=3), and desmoplastic small round cell tumors (DSRCT) (n=1) with twice weekly infusions of GD2BATs at 40, 80, or 160 x 106 GD2BATs/kg/infusion with daily interleukin 2 (300,000 IU/m2) and twice weekly granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (250 μg/m2). Phase II portion of the trial was conducted in patients with NB at the dose 3 level of 160 x 106 GD2BATs/kg/infusion but failed to enroll the planned number of patients.

Results

Nine of 12 patients in the phase I completed therapy. There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). All patients developed mild and manageable cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with grade 2-3 fevers/chills, headaches, and occasional hypotension up to 72 hours after GD2BAT infusions. GD2-antibody associated pain was not significant in this study. The median OS for patients in the Phase I and limited Phase II was 18.0 and 31.2 months, respectively, whereas the combined OS was 21.1 months. There was a complete bone marrow response with overall stable disease in one of the phase I patients with NB. Ten of 12 phase II patients were evaluable for response: 1 had partial response. Three additional patients were deemed to have clinical benefit with prolonged stable disease. More than 50% of evaluable patients showed augmented immune responses to GD2+ targets after GD2BATs as measured by interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) EliSpots, Th1 cytokines, and/or chemokines.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated safety of up to 160 x 106 cells/kg/infusion of GD2BATs. Combined with evidence for the development of post treatment endogenous immune responses, this data supports further investigation of GD2 BATs in larger Phase II clinical trials.

Novel anti-CD30/CD3 bispecific antibodies activate human T cells and mediate potent anti-tumor activity

CD30 is expressed on Hodgkin lymphomas (HL), many non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), and non-lymphoid malignancies in children and adults. Tumor expression, combined with restricted expression in healthy tissues, identifies CD30 as a promising immunotherapy target. An anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) has been approved by the FDA for HL. While anti-CD30 ADCs and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have shown promise, their shortcomings and toxicities suggest that alternative treatments are needed. We developed novel anti-CD30 x anti-CD3 bispecific antibodies (biAbs) to coat activated patient T cells (ATCs) ex vivo prior to autologous re-infusions. Our goal is to harness the dual specificity of the biAb, the power of cellular therapy, and the safety of non-genetically modified autologous T cell infusions. We present a comprehensive characterization of the CD30 binding and tumor cell killing properties of these biAbs. Five unique murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were generated against the extracellular domain of human CD30. Resultant anti-CD30 mAbs were purified and screened for binding specificity, affinity, and epitope recognition. Two lead mAb candidates with unique sequences and CD30 binding clusters that differ from the ADC in clinical use were identified. These mAbs were chemically conjugated with OKT3 (an anti-CD3 mAb). ATCs were armed and evaluated in vitro for binding, cytokine production, and cytotoxicity against tumor lines and then in vivo for tumor cell killing. Our lead mAb was subcloned to make a Master Cell Bank (MCB) and screened for binding against a library of human cell surface proteins. Only huCD30 was bound. These studies support a clinical trial in development employing ex vivo-loading of autologous T cells with this novel biAb.

Bispecific antibody-targeted T-cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia

The management of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) continues to be therapeutically challenging. Non-toxic immunotherapy approaches are needed to provide long-term anti-leukemic effects. The goal of this study was to determine whether activated T cells (ATCs) armed with bispecific antibodies (BiAbs) could target and lyse leukemic and leukemic stem cells (LSCs). Anti-CD3 × anti-CD123 BiAb (CD123Bi) and anti-CD3 × anti-CD33GO (gemtuzumab ozogamicin [GO]) BiAb (CD33GOBi) were used to arm ATCs to produce bispecific antibody armed activated T cells (designated CD123 BATs or CD33GO BATs) to target AML cell lines, peripheral blood mononuclear cells from AML patients, and in vivo treatment of AML in xenogeneic NSG mice engrafted with leukemic cells. BATs exhibited high levels of specific cytotoxicity directed at AML cell lines at low 1:1 or 1:2 effector-to-target (E:T) ratios and secrete Th₁ cytokines upon target engagement. In vivo study in AML-engrafted NSG mice showed significantly prolonged survival in mice treated with CD33GO BATs (p < 0.0001) or CD123 BATs (p < 0.0089) compared to ATC-treated control mice. Patient samples containing leukemic blasts and LSCs when treated with CD33GO BATs or CD123 BATs for 18 h showed a significant reduction (50%-100%; p < 0.005) in blasts and 75%-100% reduction in LSCs (p < 0.005) in most cases compared to unarmed ATCs. This approach may provide a potent and non-toxic strategy to target AML blasts and LSCs and enhance chemo-responsiveness in older patients who are likely to develop recurrent diseases.

LIGHT enhanced bispecific antibody armed T-cells to treat immunotherapy resistant colon cancer

Abstract

Increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are associated with improved patient responses to immunotherapy. As a result, there is interest in enhancing lymphocyte trafficking particularly to colon cancers since the majority are checkpoint blockade-resistant and microsatellite stable. Here, we demonstrate that activated T-cells (ATC) armed with anti-CD3 x anti-EGFR bispecific antibody increases TIL and mediate anti-tumor cytotoxicity while decreasing tumor cell viability. Furthermore, treatment induces endogenous anti-tumor immunity that resisted tumor rechallenge and increased memory T-cell subsets in the tumor. When combined with targeted tumor expression of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily member LIGHT, activated T-cell proliferation and infiltration were further enhanced, and human colorectal tumor regressions were observed. Our data indicate that tumor-targeted armed bispecific antibody increases TIL trafficking and is a potentially potent strategy that can be paired with combination immunotherapy to battle microsatellite stable colon cancer.

Significance

Enhancing trafficking of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to solid tumors has been shown to improve outcomes. Unfortunately, few strategies have been successful in the clinical setting for solid tumors, particularly for “cold” microsatellite stable colon cancers. In order to address this gap in knowledge, this study combined TNFSF14/LIGHT immunomodulation with a bispecific antibody armed with activated T-cells targeted to the tumor. This unique T-cell trafficking strategy successfully generated anti-tumor immunity in a microsatellite stable colon cancer model, stimulated T-cell infiltration, and holds promise as a combination immunotherapy for treating advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Impact of dose feasibility on the conduct of phase I trials of adoptive cell therapy

BACKGROUND

/Aims: In early-phase cell therapy trials, each dose level being studied is defined by the number of cells infused into the trial participant. The issue of dose feasibility presents itself when the desired number of cells is not reached in the expansion process. Consequently, dose assignments for some patients may deviate from the planned dose according to the chosen design. Widely used algorithmic designs aren't flexible enough to handle this complication and can lead to the exclusion of safety data from the dose assignment algorithm. This article studies the impact of dose feasibility challenges on the behavior of the 3 + 3 decision rule.

METHODS

We conducted a simulation study across six dose-feasibility and dose-toxicity scenarios. Trials are simulated using the 3 + 3 algorithm. We present a novel algorithm for random feasibility curve generation. We used this algorithm to conduct a large-scale simulation study across 100 random scenarios.

RESULTS

We found that the 3 + 3 has problematic characteristics due to the exclusion of safety data from the algorithm. Ignoring toxicity data can complicate the allocation of subsequent patients in the trial and can bias the final maximum tolerated dose recommendation for the next phase of drug development.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that excluding safety data from the 3 + 3 algorithm can be detrimental to trial conduct. Furthermore, there are existing methods that are flexible enough to include data that is observed away from the planned dose. We recommend that these methods be used in conducting phase I cell therapy trials.

Facile Generation of Potent Bispecific Fab via Sortase A and Click Chemistry for Cancer Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

The formats of bispecific antibody have been investigated for many years to enhance the stability of the structure and anti-tumor efficacy. One of the formats combining two Fabs at their C termini provides unmodified variable region and comparable activity to other fragment-based bispecific antibodies that are usually combined in a head-to-tail manner. However, the current strategy to produce the BiFab molecule is limited to a semisynthetic method that introduces unnatural amino acid to antibodies’ sequences during production. To improve the application of BiFab format in investigational biodrugs, we have applied sortase A-mediated “bio-click” chemistry to generate BiFab, for facile assembly of Fab molecules that have been expressed and stored as BiFab module candidates. The BiFabs made by our method stimulate T cell proliferation and activation with favorable in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activit. Our results indicate that BiFab made by sortase A-mediated click chemistry could be used to efficiently generate various BiFabs with high potency, which further supports personalized tumor immunotherapy in the future.

Abstract

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) for T cell engagement have shown great promise in cancer immunotherapy, and their clinical applications have been proven in treating hematological malignance. Bispecific antibody binding fragment (BiFab) represents a promising platform for generating non-Fc bispecific antibodies. However, the generation of BiFab is still challenging, especially by means of chemical conjugation. More conjugation strategies, e.g., enzymatic conjugation and modular BiFab preparation, are needed to improve the robustness and flexibility of BiFab preparation. We successfully used chemo-enzymatic conjugation approach to generate bispecific antibody (i.e., BiFab) with Fabs from full-length antibodies. Paired click handles (e.g., N₃ and DBCO) was introduced to the C-terminal LPETG tag of Fabs via sortase A mediated transpeptidation, followed by site-specific conjugation between two click handle-modified Fabs for BiFab generation. Both BiFab^CD20/CD3 (EC₅₀ = 0.26 ng/mL) and BiFab^Her2/CD3 exhibited superior efficacy in mediating T cells, from either PBMC or ATC, to kill target tumor cell lines while spared antigen-negative tumor cells in vitro. The BiFab^CD20/CD3 also efficiently inhibited CD20-positive tumor growth in mouse xenograft model. We have established a facile sortase A-mediated click handle installation to generate homogeneous and functional BiFabs. The exemplary BiFabs against different targets showed superior efficacy in redirecting and activating T cells to specifically kill target tumor cells, demonstrating the robustness of sortase A-mediated “bio-click” chemistry in generating various potent BiFabs. This approach also holds promise for further efficient construction of a Fab derivative library for personalized tumor immunotherapy in the future.

Overcoming the challenges associated with CD3+ T-cell redirection in cancer

The development of bispecific antibodies that redirect the cytotoxic activity of CD3+ T cells to tumours is a promising immunotherapeutic strategy for the treatment of haematological malignancies and solid cancers. Since the landmark FDA approval at the end of 2014 of the anti-CD3 × anti-CD19 bispecific antibody blinatumomab (Blincyto®) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, ~100 clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of CD3+ bispecific T-cell redirectors for cancer have been initiated. However, despite early success, numerous challenges pertaining to CD3+ T-cell redirection in the context of cancer exist, including the recruitment of counterproductive CD3+ T-cell subsets, the release of systemic cytokines, the expansion of immune checkpoint molecules, the presence of an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment, tumour antigen loss/escape, on-target off-tumour toxicity and suboptimal potency. The aim of the present review is to discuss novel approaches to overcome the key challenges associated with CD3+ bispecific T-cell redirection in order to achieve an optimal balance of anti-tumour activity and safety.

High-dose rituximab in combination with autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose rituximab (HD-R) in combination with autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

There were 22 patients in the HD-R group, to whom rituximab was administered during stem cell mobilization (375mg/m² 1 day before and 7 days after chemotherapy) and after transplantation (1000mg/m² on days +1 and +8). In the control group, the procedure was the same as that in the HD-R group but without rituximab. We observed the safety, tolerability, adverse effects and immune reconstitution of HD-R therapy. The log-rank test, univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of HD-R on survival.

RESULTS

In total, 22 relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients were treated with HD-R. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed except for CD19⁺ B cell reconstruction in the first 6 months after SCT. There were 20 relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients in the control group. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) greatly improved in the HD-R group compared to that in the control group (63.8% vs. 35.0%, P=0.028 and 80.1% vs. 50.0%, P=0.035, respectively). The univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that HD-R and the time to relapse were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS.

CONCLUSION

HD-R in combination with auto-SCT is a feasible and promising treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

Bispecific, T-Cell-Recruiting Antibodies in B-Cell Malignancies

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are designed to recognize and bind to two different antigens or epitopes. In the last few decades, BsAbs have been developed within the context of cancer therapies and in particular for the treatment of hematologic B-cell malignancies. To date, more than one hundred different BsAb formats exist, including bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), and new constructs are constantly emerging. Advances in protein engineering have enabled the creation of BsAbs with specific mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Moreover, a better understanding of resistance and evasion mechanisms, as well as advances in the protein engineering and in immunology, will help generating a greater variety of BsAbs to treat various cancer types. This review focuses on T-cell-engaging BsAbs and more precisely on the various BsAb formats currently being studied in the context of B-cell malignancies, on ongoing clinical trials and on the clinical concerns to be taken into account in the development of new BsAbs.

Anti-CS1 × Anti-CD3 Bispecific Antibody (BiAb)-Armed Anti-CD3 Activated T Cells (CS1-BATs) Kill CS1+ Myeloma Cells and Release Type-1 Cytokines

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable despite significant advances in chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. Bispecific antibody (BiAb)-armed activated T cells (BATs) have been developed for targeting and treatment of solid and hematologic malignancies. BATs are serial killers of tumor cells, secrete Th₁ cytokines, and induce adaptive cellular and humoral immune responses in patients (pts). This study provides preclinical data using bispecific anti-CS1 (elotuzumab) × anti-CD3 (OKT3) antibody (CS1Bi)-armed activated T cells (CS1- BATs) that provide a strong rationale for applying CS1-BATs to pts with MM.

Methods: CS1-BATs and unarmed activated T cells (ATC) were incubated with MM cell targets at various effector to target ratios (E:T) in a quantitative flow cytometry-based assay to determine the degree of cell loss relative to target cells incubated without ATC. ATC from up to 8 normal donors were armed with various concentrations of CS1 BiAb and tested against 5 myeloma cells lines for CS1-BATs-mediated killing and release of Th₁ cytokines, chemokines and granzyme B.

Results: CS1-BATs from normal donors killed each of 5 MM cell lines proportional to E:T ratios ranging between 1:1 and 10:1 and arming concentrations of 12.5 to 50 ng/million ATC, which was accompanied by release of Th₁ cytokines, chemokines and granzyme B. CS1-BATs prepared from MM pts' peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) showed increasing cytotoxicity and T cell expansion over time against ARH77 MM cells. The optimal arming dose of CS1Bi is 50 ng/10⁶ ATC.

Conclusions: These data demonstrate the therapeutic potential of CS1-BATs-mediated cytotoxicity and Th₁ cytokines release at low E:T and support advancing their clinical development in pts with MM.

Adaptive dose-finding based on safety and feasibility in early-phase clinical trials of adoptive cell immunotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Dose feasibility is a challenge that may arise in the development of adoptive T cell therapies for cancer. In early-phase clinical trials, dose is quantified either by a fixed or per unit body weight number of cells infused. It may not be feasible, however, to administer a patient's assigned dose due to an insufficient number of cells harvested or functional heterogeneity of the product. The study objective becomes to identify the maximum tolerated dose with high feasibility of being administered. This article describes a new dose-finding method that adaptively accounts for safety and feasibility endpoints in guiding dose allocation.

METHODS

We propose an adaptive dose-finding method that integrates accumulating feasibility and safety data to select doses for participant cohorts in early-phase trials examining adoptive cell immunotherapy. We sequentially model the probability of dose-limiting toxicity and the probability of feasibility using independent beta-binomial models. The probability model for toxicity borrows information across all dose levels using isotonic regression, allowing participants infused at a lower dose than his or her planned dose to contribute safety data to the dose-finding algorithm. We applied the proposed methodology in a single simulated trial and evaluated its operating characteristics through extensive simulation studies.

RESULTS

In simulations conducted for a phase I study of adoptive immunotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the proposed method demonstrates the ability to identify accurately the feasible maximum tolerated doses and to treat participants at and around these doses. Over 10 hypothesized scenarios studied, the percentage of correctly selecting the true feasible and maximum tolerated dose ranged from 50% to 90% with sample sizes averaging between 21 and 24 participants. A comparison to the only known existing method accounting for safety and feasibility yields competitive performance.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a new practical adaptive dose-finding method to assess feasibility in early-phase adoptive cell therapy trials. A design that incorporates feasibility, as a function of the quantity and quality of the product manufactured, in addition to safety will have an impact on the recommended phase II doses in studies that evaluate patient outcomes.

Treatment of hematological malignancies with T cell redirected bispecific antibodies: current status and future needs

INTRODUCTION

Enthusiasm for developing therapeutic bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) for cancer applications has become intense in the past decade facilitated by advances in molecular biology, hybridoma technology, and protein engineering. The central strategy in BsAb engineering is to combine the specificities directed at effector cells, and at a tumor target associated antigen (TAA) into a single construct.

AREAS COVERED

This article highlights the clinical use of BsAbs to target effector cells to multiple myeloma (MM), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We discuss the successes, challenges, and future strategies. Secondary literature search was performed using Pubmed, clinicaltrials.gov and non-proprietary internet search engines.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of BsAb constructs to target hematologic malignancies has achieved limited success to date. There continues to be a high level of enthusiasm for developing and applying new constructs to overcome the challenges in engineering and clinical application for hematologic malignancies.

A review of bispecific antibodies and antibody constructs in oncology and clinical challenges

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are antibodies that bind two distinct epitopes to cancer.. For use in oncology, one bsAb has been approved and 57 bsAbs are in clinical trials, none of which has reached phase 3. These bsAbs show great variability in design and mechanism of action. The various designs are often linked to the mechanisms of actions. The majority of bsAbs engage immune cells to destroy tumor cells. However, some bsAbs are also used to deliver payloads to tumors or to block tumor signaling pathways. This review provides insight into the choice of construct for bsAbs, summarizes the clinical development of bsAbs in oncology and identifies subsequent challenges.

Bispecific Antibody Armed T Cells to Target Cancer Cells

The common strategy for making bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) involves combining the variable domains of the desired monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) into a single bispecific structure. Bispecific immunotherapeutics has generated many different formats of BsAbs including chemical heteroconjugation of two complete molecules or fragments of monoclonal antibodies, quadroma, F(ab)₂, diabodies, tandem diabodies, and single-chain antibodies (scFv). This chapter describes the process of generating activated T cells and arming T cells with heteroconjugated BsAbs to target cancer cells.

Bispecific antibodies in haematological malignancies

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) combine the binding sites of two monoclonal antibodies in one molecule. The close proximity of a tumor specific antigen and an effector cell antigen results in a targeted activation of effector cells. The mechanism is similar to the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, recently approved in two haematologic cancers. CAR T-cells and bsAb represent the most powerful tools for major-histocompatibility complex (MHC) independent T-cell immune response against cancer. In contrast to CAR T-cells, bsAbs are "off the shelf" drugs. As a drawback, the efficacy is dependent on a prolonged application. More than 40 years of intensive research generate a plethora of bispecific constructs with a remarkable difference in manufacturability, stability, half-life time and receptor affinity. Blinatumomab was the first approved bsAb in relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. By the mature experience of blinatumomab in more than 10 clinical trials over more than one decade, we learned some lessons on how to use this new principle. The efficacy is higher in patients with less tumor burden, suggesting the use as consolidation more than for initial debulking. Main resistance mechanisms are extramedullary relapses and the expression of the inhibitory PD-L1 molecule, suggesting the value of combination with checkpoint inhibitors. CD19 loss is infrequent after blinatumomab, preserving the option for alternative CD19-direct treatments. New bsAbs in lymphoma, myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia enter phase-I trials, together with many new constructs in solid cancer.

Bispecific antibody based therapeutics: Strengths and challenges

Monoclonal antibody-based targeted therapy has greatly improved treatment options for patients. However, long-term efficacy of such antibodies is limited by resistance mechanisms. New insights into the mechanisms by which tumors evade immune control have driven innovative therapeutic strategies to eliminate cancer by re-directing immune cells to tumors. Advances in protein engineering technology have generated multiple bispecific antibody (BsAb) formats capable of targeting multiple antigens as a single agent. Approval of two BsAb and three check point blocking mAbs represent a paradigm shift in the use of antibody constructs. Since BsAbs can directly target immune cells to tumors, drug resistance and severe adverse effects are much reduced. The wave of next generation "bispecific or multispecific antibodies" has advanced multiple candidates into ongoing clinical trials. In this review, we focus on preclinical and clinical studies in hematological malignancies as well as discuss reasons for the limited success of BsAbs against solid tumors.

Bispecific antibodies: design, therapy, perspectives

Antibodies (Abs) containing two different antigen-binding sites in one molecule are called bispecific. Bispecific Abs (BsAbs) were first described in the 1960s, the first monoclonal BsAbs were generated in the 1980s by hybridoma technology, and the first article describing the therapeutic use of BsAbs was published in 1992, but the number of papers devoted to BsAbs has increased significantly in the last 10 years. Particular interest in BsAbs is due to their therapeutic use. In the last decade, two BsAbs - catumaxomab in 2009 and blinatumomab in 2014, were approved for therapeutic use. Papers published in recent years have been devoted to various methods of BsAb generation by genetic engineering and chemical conjugation, and describe preclinical and clinical trials of these drugs in a variety of diseases. This review considers diverse BsAb-production methods, describes features of therapeutic BsAbs approved for medical use, and summarizes the prospects of practical application of promising new BsAbs.

Redirecting T cells to hematological malignancies with bispecific antibodies

There is a need to improve outcomes for patients with recurrent and/or refractory hematological malignancies. Immunotherapy holds the promise to meet this need, because it does not rely on the cytotoxic mechanism of conventional therapies. Among different forms of immunotherapy, redirecting T cells to hematological malignancies with bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) is an attractive strategy. BsAbs are an "off-the-shelf" product that is easily scalable in contrast to adoptive T-cell therapies. Among these, the bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab has emerged as the most successful BsAb to date. It consists of 2 single-chain variable fragments specific for CD19 present on B-cell malignancies and CD3 expressed on almost all T cells. Blinatumomab has shown potent antitumor activity as a single agent, particularly for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, resulting in its US Food and Drug Administration approval. However, although successful in inducing remissions, these are normally short-lived, with median response durations of <1 year. Nevertheless, the success of blinatumomab has reinvigorated the BsAb field, which is bustling with preclinical and clinical studies for not only B-cell-derived lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma but also acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma. Here, we will review the successes and challenges of T-cell-targeted BsAbs for the immunotherapy of hematological malignancies with special focus on conducted clinical studies and strategies to improve their efficacy.

New developments in immunotherapy for lymphoma

The development of immunotherapies for lymphoma has undergone a revolutionary evolution over the past decades. Since the advent of rituximab as the first successful immunotherapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma over two decades ago, a plethora of new immunotherapeutic approaches to treat lymphoma has ensued. Four of the most exciting classes of immunotherapies include: chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, bispecific antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and vaccines. However, with addition of these novel therapies the appropriate timing of treatment, optimal patient population, duration of therapy, toxicity, and cost must be considered. In this review, we describe the most-promising immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of lymphoma in clinical development, specifically focusing on clinical trials performed to date and strategies for improvement.

Specific Adoptive T-Cell Therapy for Viral and Fungal Infections

Despite advances in anti-infective agents, viral and fungal infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) continue to cause life-threatening complications that limit the success of HSCT. Early adoptive T-cell immunotherapy studies showed that administration of allogeneic virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (vCTL) can prevent and control viral infections and reconstitute antiviral immunity to cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Advances in immunobiology, in vitro culture technology, and current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) have provided opportunities for advancing adoptive cell therapy for viral infections: (1) T cells have been expanded targeting multiple pathogens; (2) vCTL production no longer requires viral infection or viral vector transduction of antigen-presenting cells (APCs); (3) the source of lymphocytes is no longer restricted to donors who are immune to the pathogens; (4) naive T cells have been redirected with chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs) or armed with bispecific antibody-armed T cells (BATs) to mediate vCTL activity; (5) these technologies could be combined to targeted multiple viral or fungal pathogens; and (6) pathogen-specific T-cell products manufactured from third parties and banked for “off-the-shelf” use post-HSCT may soon become a reality.

Activated T cells armed with bispecific antibodies kill tumor targets

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adoptive T-cell therapy has become one of the most exciting fields of cancer therapy in the past few years. In this article, we describe a method which combines adoptive T-cell therapy with antibody therapy by arming T cells from cord blood, normal patients, and cancer patients with bispecific antibodies capable of binding to tumor-associated antigens on one side of the bispecific antibody construct and T cells on another side of the construct. This approach redirects T cells against tumor cells in a non-MHC-restricted manner.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various methods for manipulating the immune system including check-point inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and bispecific antibodies have shown promising activity in treating both hematological malignancies and solid tumors with excellent success. In recent studies, activated T cells armed with bispecific antibodies have shown good preclinical activity, safety, and promising efficacy in the clinical trials.

SUMMARY

Activated T cells armed with bispecific antibodies represent a promising treatment for cancer immunotherapy.

Targeting CD138-/CD20+ Clonogenic Myeloma Precursor Cells Decreases These Cells and Induces Transferable Antimyeloma Immunity

This phase Ib clinical trial evaluated whether pretargeting of CD20(+) clonogenic myeloma precursor cells (CMPCs) with anti-CD3 × anti-CD20 bispecific antibody-armed T cells (BATs) before autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with standard-risk and high-risk multiple myeloma would induce antimyeloma immunity that could be detected and boosted after SCT. All 12 patients enrolled in this study received 2 BATs infusions before SCT, and 4 patients received a booster infusion of BATs after SCT. Pretargeting CD138(-)/CD20(+) CMPCs with BATs before SCT was safe and reduced levels of CMPCs by up to 58% in the postinfusion bone marrow in patients who remained in remission. Four of 5 patients who remained in remission had a >5-fold increase in IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot responses. SOX2 antibody increased after BATs infusions and persisted after SCT. The median anti-SOX2 level at 3 months after SCT was 28.1 ng/mL (range, 4.6 to 256 ng/mL) in patients who relapsed and 46 ng/mL (range, 28.3 to 73.3 ng/mL) in patients who remained in remission. The immune correlates suggest that infusions of targeted T cells given before SCT were able to reduce CMPC levels and induced cellular and humoral antimyeloma immunity that could be transferred and boosted after SCT.

"NextGen" Biologics: Bispecific Antibodies and Emerging Clinical Results

INTRODUCTION

Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are emerging as a novel approach for dual targeting strategies. Two bispecific antibodies are approved for therapy and >30 are in clinical development. The first generation of BsAb were produced by chemical cross-linking or hybridoma technology; with the recent advent of genetic and protein engineering technologies numerous formats of bispecific antibodies have emerged using either the fragments of IgG or whole IgG molecules. Further areas of development include dual blockade of different disease pathways, diagnosis and imaging.

AREAS COVERED

Biologics, including bi- or multi-specific antibodies and T cell-based approaches are rapidly changing the landscape of cancer therapeutics. New engineering platforms for bi- or multi-specific antibodies and scaffolds offer improved efficacy and reduced toxicities over IgG-based monoclonal antibodies. Preclinical and clinical studies using different formats of BsAbs are described in this review using PubMed as a literature search tool.

EXPERT OPINION

A comprehensive presentation of preclinical data and clinical trials evaluating the various formats of BsAbs indicate their safety and efficacy. However, a vast opportunity to fine tune physical properties and functional activity of biologics to improve the stability, engagement of cytotoxic CD8 T cells and multi-antigen targeting strategy through protein engineering holds a greater therapeutic potential.

Targeted T-cell Therapy in Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Phase I Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This study reports a phase I immunotherapy trial in 23 women with metastatic breast cancer consisting of eight infusions of anti-CD3 × anti-HER2 bispecific antibody (HER2Bi) armed anti-CD3-activated T cells (ATC) in combination with low-dose IL-2 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to determine safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), technical feasibility, T-cell trafficking, immune responses, time to progression, and overall survival (OS).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ATC were expanded from leukapheresis product using IL2 and anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody and armed with HER2Bi. In 3+3 dose escalation design, groups of 3 patients received 5, 10, 20, or 40 × 10(9) armed ATC (aATC) per infusion.

RESULTS

There were no dose-limiting toxicities and the MTD was not defined. It was technically feasible to grow 160 × 10(9) ATC from a single leukapheresis. aATC persisted in the blood for weeks and trafficked to tumors. Infusions of aATC induced anti-breast cancer responses and increases in immunokines. At 14.5 weeks after enrollment, 13 of 22 (59.1%) evaluable patients had stable disease and 9 of 22 (40.9%) had progressive disease. The median OS was 36.2 months for all patients, 57.4 months for HER2 3+ patients, and 27.4 months for HER2 0-2+ patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting HER2(+) and HER2(-) tumors with aATC infusions induced antitumor responses, increases in Th1 cytokines, and IL12 serum levels that suggest that aATC infusions vaccinated patients against their own tumors. These results provide a strong rationale for conducting phase II trials.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapeutics in the treatment of childhood malignancies

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) represents the most common and effective form of immunotherapy for childhood malignancies. The role of the graft-versus-leukemia effect in allogeneic HCT has been well established in childhood malignancies, but is also associated with short-term and long-term morbidity. HCT may be ineffective in some settings at obtaining control of the malignancy, and as such, cannot be used as a universal cancer immunotherapy. Novel therapies using dendritic cell vaccinations, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells are being evaluated as potential adjuvants to HCT.

Ipilimumab augments antitumor activity of bispecific antibody-armed T cells

BACKGROUND

Ipilimumab is an antagonistic monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) that enhances antitumor immunity by inhibiting immunosuppressive activity of regulatory T cells (Treg). In this study, we investigated whether inhibiting Treg activity with ipilimumab during ex vivo T cell expansion could augment anti-CD3-driven T cell proliferation and enhance bispecific antibody (BiAb)-redirected antitumor cytotoxicity of activated T cells (ATC).

METHODS

PBMC from healthy individuals were stimulated with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody with or without ipilimumab and expanded for 10-14 days. ATC were harvested and armed with anti-CD3 x anti-EGFR BiAb (EGFRBi) or anti-CD3 x anti-CD20 BiAb (CD20Bi) to test for redirected cytotoxicity against COLO356/FG pancreatic cancer cell line or Burkitt's lymphoma cell line (Daudi).

RESULTS

In PBMC from healthy individuals, the addition of ipilimumab at the initiation of culture significantly enhanced T cell proliferation (p = 0.0029). ATC grown in the presence of ipilimumab showed significantly increased mean tumor-specific cytotoxicity at effector:target (E:T) ratio of 25:1 directed at COLO356/FG and Daudi by 37.71% (p < 0.0004) and 27.5% (p < 0.0004), respectively, and increased the secretion of chemokines (CCL2, CCL3, CCL4,CCL5, CXCL9, and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor(GM-CSF)) and cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-2R, IL-12, and IL-13), while reducing IL-10 secretion.

CONCLUSIONS

Expansion of ATC in the presence of ipilimumab significantly improves not only the T cell proliferation but it also enhances cytokine secretion and the specific cytotoxicity of T cells armed with bispecific antibodies.

Multiple infusions of CD20-targeted T cells and low-dose IL-2 after SCT for high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a pilot study

A pilot phase I clinical trial involving 15 infusions of anti-CD3 × anti-CD20 bispecific Ab (CD20Bi)-armed anti-CD3-activated T cells (aATC) and low-dose IL-2 was conducted in three non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients (two high-risk and one refractory) after autologous SCT. The feasibility of T-cell expansion, safety of aATC infusions, cytotoxic immune responses and trafficking of aATC were evaluated. Three NHL patients received 15 infusions of 5 × 10(9) aATC (three infusions/week for 3 weeks and one infusion/week for 6 weeks) between days 1 and 65 after SCT with IL-2. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. Chills, fever, hypotension and malaise were the common side effects. Engraftment was delayed in one patient with a low stem cell dose. CD20Bi aATC infusions induced specific cytotoxicity directed at lymphoma targets. Endogenous peripheral blood mononuclear cells from two patients mediated anti-lymphoma cytotoxicity above preSCT background (P<0.001). (111)In labeled aATC trafficked to the lungs at 1 h and accumulated in the liver and bone marrow after 24 h. aATC infusions given over 69 days in combination with IL-2 were safe, did not inhibit engraftment, and induced endogenous cytotoxic responses directed at lymphoma targets.