1
|
Portuguese AJ, Yeh AC, Banerjee R, Holmberg L, Wuliji N, Green DJ, Mielcarek M, Gopal AK, Gooley T, Stevenson P, Cowan AJ. Optimizing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: The Impact of Intensive Chemomobilization. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:774.e1-774.e12. [PMID: 38768908 PMCID: PMC11296896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Most transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergo autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) using G-CSF with on-demand plerixafor (G ± P). Chemomobilization (CM) can be used as a salvage regimen after G ± P failure or for debulking residual tumor burden ahead of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Prior studies utilizing cyclophosphamide-based CM have not shown long-term benefits. At our center, intensive CM (ICM) using a PACE- or HyperCVAD-based regimen has been used to mitigate "excessive" residual disease based on plasma cell (PC) burden or MM-related biomarkers. Given the lack of efficacy of non-ICM, we sought to determine the impact of ICM on event-free survival (EFS), defined as death, progressive disease, or unplanned treatment escalation. We performed a retrospective study of newly diagnosed MM patients who collected autologous PBSCs with the intent to proceed immediately to ASCT at our center between 7/2020 and 2/2023. Patients were excluded if they underwent a tandem autologous or sequential autologous-allogeneic transplant, had primary PC leukemia, received non-ICM treatment (i.e., cyclophosphamide and/or etoposide), or had previously failed G ± P mobilization. To appropriately evaluate the impact of ICM among those who potentially could have received it, we utilized a propensity score matching (PSM) approach whereby ICM patients were compared to a cohort of non-CM patients matched on pre-ASCT factors most strongly associated with the receipt of ICM. Of 451 patients identified, 61 (13.5%) received ICM (PACE-based, n = 45; hyper-CVAD-based, n = 16). Post-ICM/pre-ASCT, 11 patients (18%) required admission for neutropenic fever and/or infection. Among 51 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 31%; however, 46 of 55 evaluable patients (84%) saw a reduction in M-spike and/or involved free light chains. Among those evaluated with longitudinal peripheral blood flow cytometry (n = 8), 5 patients (63%) cleared circulating blood PCs post-ICM. Compared to patients mobilized with non-CM, ICM patients collected a slightly greater median number of CD34+ cells (10.8 versus 10.2 × 10⁶/kg, P = .018). The median follow-up was 30.6 months post-ASCT. In a PSM multivariable analysis, ICM was associated with significantly improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.67, P = .003), but not improved OS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.44, P = .2). ICM was associated with longer post-ASCT inpatient duration (+4.1 days, 95% CI, 2.4 to 5.8, P < .001), more febrile days (+0.96 days, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.4, P < .001), impaired platelet engraftment (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.87, P = .031), more bacteremia (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.20 to 9.31, P = .018), and increased antibiotic usage (cefepime: +2.3 doses, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.1, P = .018; vancomycin: +1.0 doses, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.8, P = .012). ICM was independently associated with improved EFS in a matched analysis involving MM patients with excessive disease burden at pre-ASCT workup. This benefit came at the cost of longer inpatient duration, more febrile days, greater incidence of bacteremia, and increased antibiotic usage in the immediate post-ASCT setting. Our findings suggest that ICM could be considered for a subset of MM patients, but its use must be weighed carefully against additional toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Portuguese
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Albert C Yeh
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rahul Banerjee
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Leona Holmberg
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Natalie Wuliji
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Damian J Green
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Marco Mielcarek
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ajay K Gopal
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ted Gooley
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Andrew J Cowan
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah G, Giralt S, Dahi P. Optimizing high dose melphalan. Blood Rev 2024; 64:101162. [PMID: 38097487 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Melphalan, has been a major component of myeloma therapy since the 1950s. In the context of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), high dose melphalan (HDM) is the most common conditioning regimen used due to its potent anti-myeloma effects and manageable toxicities. Common toxicities associated with HDM include myelosuppression, gastrointestinal issues, and mucositis. Established approaches to reduce these toxicities encompass dose modification, nausea prophylaxis with 5HT3 receptor antagonists, cryotherapy, amifostine use, and growth factors. Optimization of melphalan exposure through personalized dosing and its combination with other agents like busulfan, or bendamustine show promise. Propylene glycol-free melphalan (Evomela) represents a novel formulation aiming to enhance drug stability and reduce adverse effects. This review explores strategies to enhance the efficacy and mitigate the toxicity of HDM in multiple myeloma. Future directions involve exploring these strategies in clinical trials to improve the safety and efficacy of HDM, thereby enhancing outcomes for multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous HCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunjan Shah
- Adult BMT Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10021, United States of America.
| | - Sergio Giralt
- Adult BMT Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10021, United States of America.
| | - Parastoo Dahi
- Adult BMT Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10021, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu J, Yan W, Fan H, Liu J, Li L, Du C, Deng S, Sui W, Xu Y, Qiu L, An G. Impact of residual tumor cells in the stem cell collection on multiple myeloma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation. Ann Hematol 2023; 102:3195-3204. [PMID: 37679605 PMCID: PMC10567849 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05427-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard therapy for patients with transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (TEMM). However, the ideal depth of response required before ASCT and the impact of residual tumor cells in the stem cell collection (SCC) on survival remains unclear. Here we collected data of 89 patients with TEMM undergoing ASCT and analyzed the minimal residual disease of SCC (cMRD) and bone marrow (BM) (mMRD) before transplantation. Before ASCT, 31.5% and 76.4% of patients achieved MRD negativity in BM and SCC, respectively. Tumor cells were less in SCC samples than that in BM samples. Neoplastic cells in SCC could be observed in patients with different responses after induction therapy, and there were no significant differences in the percentage and level of cMRD among these subgroups (P > 0.05). No correlation was found between the cMRD status and the response patients achieved after ASCT (P > 0.05). The median follow-up was 26.8 months. mMRD negativity before ASCT was associated with longer PFS (55.9 vs. 27.1 months; P = 0.009) but not OS (not reached vs. 58.9 months; P = 0.115). Patients with different cMRD statuses before ASCT experienced similar PFS (40.5 vs. 76.4 months for negativity vs. positivity; P = 0.685) and OS (not reached vs. 58.8 months for negativity vs. positivity; P = 0.889). These results suggested that detectable cMRD does not significantly predict the inferior post-ASCT response or shorter survival, and patients are eligible to undergo ASCT upon achieving partial response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyu Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Wenqiang Yan
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Huishou Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Jiahui Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Lingna Li
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Chenxing Du
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Shuhui Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Weiwei Sui
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Yan Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Lugui Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China
| | - Gang An
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China.
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, 301600, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Banerjee R, Cicero KI, Lee SS, Cowan AJ. Definers and drivers of functional high-risk multiple myeloma: insights from genomic, transcriptomic, and immune profiling. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1240966. [PMID: 37849816 PMCID: PMC10577204 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1240966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Traditional prognostic models for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM), including International Staging System criteria and number of high-risk chromosomal abnormalities, are based on disease characteristics at diagnosis. However, the identification of patients at risk of more rapidly progressive MM is inherently a dynamic assessment. In a subset of patients with MM, adverse disease biology only becomes evident after the failure of first-line therapy. We define this entity as functional high-risk MM (FHRMM), encompassing relapse within 18 months of treatment initiation and/or within 12 months of frontline autologous stem cell transplantation. FHRMM is not adequately captured by traditional prognostic models, and there is a need for better understanding of mechanisms or risk factors for early relapse or progression. In this review, we explore potential definitions of FHRMM before delving into its underlying drivers based on genetic, transcriptomic, and immune cell profiling studies. Emerging data suggest that specific features of both myeloma cells and immune cells can enable the FHRMM phenotype. We conclude our review by discussing ongoing and future studies that seek to identify and intervene upon patients with FHRMM preemptively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Banerjee
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Kara I. Cicero
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sarah S. Lee
- Division of Myeloma, Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, CA, United States
| | - Andrew J. Cowan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Teo WZY, Ong IYE, Tong JWY, Ong WL, Lin A, Song F, Tai BC, Ooi M, Seokojo CY, Chen Y, Nagarajan C, Chng WJ, de Mel S. Response-Adapted Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2023; 18:190-200. [PMID: 37400631 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-023-00704-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The development of potent novel agents has improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Heterogeneity of response to therapy, an expanding arsenal of treatment options, and cost are however major challenges for physicians making treatment decisions. Response-adapted therapy is hence an attractive strategy for sequencing of therapy in MM. Despite its successful application in other haematologic malignancies, response-adapted therapy is yet to become a standard of care for MM. We provide our perspective on response-adapted therapeutic strategies evaluated thus far and how they may be implemented and improved on in treatment algorithms of the future. RECENT FINDINGS While older studies suggested that early response based on International Myeloma Working Group response criteria could impact long-term outcomes, recent data have contradicted these findings. The advent of minimal residual disease (MRD) as a powerful prognostic factor in MM has raised the promise of MRD-adapted treatment strategies. The development of more sensitive techniques for paraprotein quantification as well as imaging modalities to detect extramedullary disease is likely to change response assessment in MM. These techniques combined with MRD assessment may provide sensitive and holistic response assessments which could be evaluated in clinical trials. Response-adapted treatment algorithms have the potential to allow an individualised treatment strategy, maximising efficacy, while minimising toxicities and cost. Standardisation of MRD methodology, incorporation of imaging into response assessment, and the optimal management of MRD positive patients are key questions to be addressed in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnie Z Y Teo
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Fast and Chronic Program, Alexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Y E Ong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jason W Y Tong
- Department of General Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wan Li Ong
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Adeline Lin
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fangfang Song
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bee Choo Tai
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Melissa Ooi
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cinnie Yentia Seokojo
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yunxin Chen
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Blood Cancer Centre, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chandramouli Nagarajan
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Blood Cancer Centre, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wee Joo Chng
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sanjay de Mel
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Science Institute of Singapore (NCIS), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Medicine Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
João C, Bergantim R, Santos J, Afonso C, Bernardo P, Coelho H, Costa C, Esteves G, Freitas JG, Gerivaz R, Jorge A, Macedo A, Montalvão A, Neves M, Pedrosa CL, Pereira S, Roque A, Seabra P, M Silva H, Silveira MP, Tomé A, Trigo F, Sarmento AB, Lúcio P, Geraldes C. [Multiple Myeloma Treatment Guidelines by the Portuguese Group of Multiple Myeloma]. ACTA MEDICA PORT 2023; 36:517-526. [PMID: 37429590 DOI: 10.20344/amp.19037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of multiple myeloma has profoundly changed with the introduction of several innovative therapies. The optimization of therapeutic sequencing through the combined use of the various drugs developed in recent years and the attention given to the characteristics of patients have allowed the reduction of toxicities and increased survival and quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma. These treatment recommendations from the Portuguese Multiple Myeloma Group offer guidance for first-line treatment and progression/relapse situations. These recommendations are given highlighting the data that justify each choice and referring to the respective levels of evidence that support these options. Whenever possible, the respective national regulatory framework is presented. These recommendations constitute an advance towards the best treatment of multiple myeloma in Portugal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina João
- Serviço de Hemato-Oncologia. Fundação Champalimaud. Lisboa; NOVA Medical School. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Rui Bergantim
- Serviço de Hematologia. Centro Hospitalar São João. Porto; i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde. Universidade do Porto. Porto; Cancer Drug Resistance Group. IPATIMUP - Instituto the Patologia Molecular e Imunologia. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal
| | - Joana Santos
- Serviço de Hematologia. Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Celina Afonso
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Paulo Bernardo
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Hospital da Luz Lisboa. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Henrique Coelho
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova Gaia. Gaia. Portugal
| | - Carlos Costa
- Hematologia Clínica. Instituto CUF Oncologia. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Graça Esteves
- Serviço de Hematologia e Transplante de Medula. Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte. Lisboa. Portugal
| | | | - Rita Gerivaz
- Serviço de Hematologia. Hospital Garcia de Orta. Almada. Portugal
| | - Ana Jorge
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Ana Macedo
- Serviço de Hematologia. Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve. Algarve; Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde. Universidade da Beira Interior. Covilhã. Portugal
| | - Ana Montalvão
- Unidade de Hematologia-Oncologia. Unidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Alentejo. Beja; Hospital de José Joaquim Fernandes. Beja. Portugal
| | - Manuel Neves
- Serviço de Hemato-Oncologia. Fundação Champalimaud. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Claúdia L Pedrosa
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto. Porto. Portugal
| | - Susana Pereira
- Serviço de Hematologia. Hospital Santo António dos Capuchos. Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Adriana Roque
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra. Coimbra; Instituto de Fisiologia. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal
| | - Patrícia Seabra
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto. Porto. Portugal
| | - Helena M Silva
- Serviço de Hematologia. Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu. Viseu. Portugal
| | - Maria P Silveira
- Hematologia Clínica. Clínica de Oncologia e Radioterapia. Centro Clínico SAMS. Lisboa; Serviço de Imuno-Hemoterapia. Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando da Fonseca. Amadora. Portugal
| | - Ana Tomé
- Serviço de Hematologia. Hospital Garcia de Orta. Almada. Portugal
| | - Fernanda Trigo
- Serviço de Hematologia. Centro Hospitalar São João. Porto. Portugal
| | - Ana Bela Sarmento
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra. Coimbra; Laboratório de Oncobiologia e Hematologia. Clínica Universitária de Hematologia e Instituto de Investigação Clínica e Biomédica de Coimbra. Grupo de Investigação em Ambiente, Genética e Oncobiologia. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra; Centro Académico Clínico de Coimbra. Coimbra. . Portugal
| | - Paulo Lúcio
- Serviço de Hemato-Oncologia. Fundação Champalimaud. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Catarina Geraldes
- Serviço de Hematologia Clínica. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra. Coimbra; Laboratório de Oncobiologia e Hematologia. Clínica Universitária de Hematologia e Instituto de Investigação Clínica e Biomédica de Coimbra. Grupo de Investigação em Ambiente, Genética e Oncobiologia. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra; Centro Académico Clínico de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim M, Lee JJ, Min CK, Lee JY, Jo JC, Yoon SS, Lim SN, Do YR, Kim K, Lee JH, Yoo KH, Bae SH, Yi JH, Jung J, Eom HS, Jung SH. Busulfan plus melphalan versus high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma with high-risk features (KMM 2015). Ann Hematol 2023:10.1007/s00277-023-05308-0. [PMID: 37392367 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05308-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite the development of effective agents for multiple myeloma (MM), the management of patients with high-risk MM (HRMM) is challenging. High-dose treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is regarded as upfront treatment for transplant-eligible patients with HRMM. In the present study, we retrospectively investigated the efficacies of two conditioning regimens for upfront ASCT in newly diagnosed patients with MM and high-risk features: high-dose melphalan (HDMEL; 200 mg/m2) and busulfan plus melphalan (BUMEL). In total, 221 patients underwent ASCT between May 2005 and June 2021; among these 221 patients, 79 had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. In patients with high-risk cytogenetics, BUMEL showed a tendency toward longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to HDMEL (median OS; not reached vs. 53.2 months; P = 0.091, median PFS; not reached vs. 31.7 months; P = 0.062). Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed that BUMEL was significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio = 0.37, 95% confidence interval = 0.15-0.89, P = 0.026). We compared BUMEL with HDMEL in patients with other high-risk features, such as high lactate dehydrogenase level, extramedullary disease, and poor response to frontline therapy. Notably, among patients with less than very good partial response (VGPR) to frontline therapy, median PFS was significantly longer in the BUMEL group than in the HDMEL group (55.1 vs. 17.3 months, respectively; P = 0.011). These findings indicate that BUMEL may be an effective conditioning regimen for upfront ASCT in MM patients with high-risk cytogenetics; BUMEL may be more appropriate than HDMEL for patients with less than VGPR to frontline therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihee Kim
- Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hawsun, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Je-Jung Lee
- Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hawsun, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Ki Min
- Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yun Lee
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Cheol Jo
- Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Soo Yoon
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Nam Lim
- Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Rok Do
- Keimyung University, Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Kihyun Kim
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwai Han Yoo
- Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Hwa Bae
- Daegu Catholic University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jun Ho Yi
- Chung-ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Sung-Hoon Jung
- Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hawsun, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Banerjee R, Williams L, Mikhael JR. Should I stay or should I go (to transplant)? Managing insufficient responses to induction in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:89. [PMID: 37248225 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00864-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Banerjee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Louis Williams
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph R Mikhael
- Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), City of Hope, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dhakal B, Shah N, Kansagra A, Kumar A, Lonial S, Garfall A, Cowan A, Poudyal BS, Costello C, Gay F, Cook G, Quach H, Einsele H, Schriber J, Hou J, Costa L, Aljurf M, Chaudhry M, Beksac M, Prince M, Mohty M, Janakiram M, Callander N, Biran N, Malhotra P, Otero PR, Moreau P, Abonour R, Iftikhar R, Silberman R, Mailankody S, Gregory T, Lin Y, Carpenter P, Hamadani M, Usmani S, Kumar S. ASTCT Clinical Practice Recommendations for Transplantation and Cellular Therapies in Multiple Myeloma. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:284-293. [PMID: 35306217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Over the past decade, therapeutic options in multiple myeloma (MM) have changed dramatically. Given the unprecedented efficacy of novel agents, the role of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in MM remains under scrutiny. Rapid advances in myeloma immunotherapy including the recent approval of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy will impact the MM therapeutic landscape. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy convened an expert panel to formulate clinical practice recommendations for role, timing, and sequencing of autologous (auto-HCT), allogeneic (allo-HCT) and CAR T-cell therapy for patients with newly diagnosed (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate consensus statements. Twenty consensus statements were generated. The panel endorsed continued use of auto-HCT consolidation for patients with NDMM as a standard-of-care option, whereas in the front line allo-HCT and CAR-T were not recommended outside the setting of clinical trial. For patients not undergoing auto-HCT upfront, the panel recommended its use in first relapse. Lenalidomide as a single agent was recommended for maintenance especially for standard risk patients. In the RRMM setting, the panel recommended the use of CAR-T in patients with 4 or more prior lines of therapy. The panel encouraged allo-HCT in RRMM setting only in the context of clinical trial. The panel found RAND-modified Delphi methodology effective in providing a formal framework for developing consensus recommendations for the timing and sequence of cellular therapies for MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binod Dhakal
- Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Nina Shah
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Ankit Kansagra
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ambuj Kumar
- Program for Comparative Effectiveness Research, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sagar Lonial
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alfred Garfall
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew Cowan
- University of Washington, Seattle WA, and Fred Hutch, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bishesh Sharma Poudyal
- Department of Clinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Civil Service Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Caitlin Costello
- UCSD/Sharp Healthcare Transplant Program, Blood & Marrow Transplant Services, Moore's Cancer Center, San-Diego, California
| | - Francesca Gay
- Division of Hematology 1 Clinical Trial Unit, AOU CIttà della salute e della Scienza, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Gordon Cook
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trial Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Hang Quach
- University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Herman Einsele
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Department of Internal Medicine II, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jeff Schriber
- Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jian Hou
- Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Luciano Costa
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mahmoud Aljurf
- Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maria Chaudhry
- Department of hematology/Oncology, George Washington University and Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Meral Beksac
- Department of Hematology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Miles Prince
- Epworth Healthcare and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- Department of Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Murali Janakiram
- Division of Myeloma, Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, California
| | | | - Noa Biran
- Hackensack Meridian Health, John Theurer Cancer Center, Multiple Myeloma Division, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | - Pankaj Malhotra
- Department of Clinical Hematology & Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Rafat Abonour
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Raheel Iftikhar
- Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Rebecca Silberman
- Department of Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sham Mailankody
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New, York, New York
| | - Tara Gregory
- Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Sarah Cannon Cancer Network, Denver, Colorado
| | - Yi Lin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul Carpenter
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mehdi Hamadani
- Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| | - Saad Usmani
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New, York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Improvement in Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Survival of Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Long-Term Institutional Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092277. [PMID: 35565406 PMCID: PMC9102875 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) represents 1.8% of all new cancer cases in the U.S. While not curable, advances in treatment, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and maintenance therapy, have dramatically improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a retrospective survival analysis on newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving ASCT from 1992−2016 at the Ohio State University. A total of 1001 consecutive NDMM patients were eligible. Patients were split into five groups based on historic changes in novel agents for the treatment of MM. Across the years (1992−2016), there was a statistically significant improvement in both PFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.01). Significant improvements in both PFS and OS were seen in patients ≤65 years (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002) and >65 years old (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), respectively. Improved PFS and OS were seen in both standard-risk (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) and high-risk patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019). The post-transplant response showed statistically significant improvement across the years (p < 0.01). Survival rates for NDMM patients have significantly improved primarily due to the inclusion of novel therapies and post-ASCT maintenance.
Collapse
|
11
|
Keruakous AR, Asch A, Aljumaily R, Zhao D, Yuen C. Prognostic impact of natural killer cell recovery on minimal residual disease after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Transpl Immunol 2022; 71:101544. [PMID: 35093506 PMCID: PMC10434759 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Natural killer cells are a potent effector lymphocyte subset that can induce cytotoxicity without the need for antigen sensitization or presentation. NK cells are a tempting target -for immune therapy, monoclonal antibody, or genetic engineering-to enhance immune surveillance mechanisms against myeloma cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS We hypothesized an association between natural killer cell recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and disease outcomes in multiple myeloma patients. We concluded a prospective study that started enrolling patients in January 2020 to identify the association between absolute NK cell count two to three after ASCT and disease outcomes after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Natural killer cell recovery was evaluated during the third month after ASCT, day +60 to +90 post-ASCT. Our patients had a mean NK cell count of 90.53, ranging from 14 to 282 Cell/μL (Std Dev 84.64 Cell/μL). The odds of having a minimal residual disease (MRD-positivity) among patients with partial remission before transplantation is four times higher than patients with very good partial response or better (95% confidence interval 0.45-35.79). Our patients were classified into two groups based on MRD status after ASCT, an MRD-negative group of eight participants and an MRD-positive group of seven participants. The mean absolute NK cell count was significantly higher in the MRD-negative cohort, 131.38 Cell/μL, versus 43.86 Cell/μL in the MRD-positive group (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION We conclude that for multiple myeloma patients treated with ASCT, high absolute NK cell counts two to three months after ASCT is an independent predictor for MRD negativity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amany R Keruakous
- Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States of America.
| | - Adam Asch
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America
| | - Raid Aljumaily
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America
| | - Daniel Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America
| | - Carrie Yuen
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vekemans MC, Doyen C, Caers J, Wu K, Kentos A, Mineur P, Michaux L, Delforge M, Meuleman N. Recommendations on the management of multiple myeloma in 2020. Acta Clin Belg 2022; 77:445-461. [PMID: 33355041 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1860411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
With the introduction of immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, major improvements have been achieved in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), with a significant impact on the outcome of this disease. Different treatment combinations are now in use and other therapies are being developed. Based on an extensive review of the recent literature, we propose practical recommendations on myeloma management, to be used by hematologists as a reference for daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chantal Doyen
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Namur, UCL, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Jo Caers
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Ulg, Liège, Belgium
| | - Kalung Wu
- Zienkenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Lucienne Michaux
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven Gasthuisberg, KUL, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Delforge
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven Gasthuisberg, KUL, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh S, Sharma R, Singh J, Jain K, Paul D. Autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in the novel agent era: Systematic review of Indian data and implications for resource constrained settings. J Cancer Res Ther 2022; 19:S12-S19. [PMID: 37147978 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_503_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of multiple myeloma has undergone significant advances in the last two decades, leading to meaningful improvement in overall and progression free survival. The incurable nature of disease necessitates serial sequencing of treatment options and continuous therapy once disease remission is achieved. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has continued to offer a meaningful survival advantage with a consistent reduction in toxicity and costs. Despite the advent of newer drugs leading to deeper and sustained responses, ASCT continues to be the standard of care for all eligible patients and is ostensibly more cost effective than continued treatment with newer agents. However, ASCT continues to be underutilized in India, due to concerns about cost, safety, and sporadic expertize. We present a systematic review of available data on ASCT for multiple myeloma from India to evaluate safety and efficacy of the procedure, and provide evidence re-affirming its utility in resource constrained settings.
Collapse
|
14
|
Minakata D, Fujiwara SI, Murahashi R, Nakashima H, Matsuoka S, Ikeda T, Kawaguchi SI, Toda Y, Ito S, Nagayama T, Mashima K, Umino K, Nakano H, Yamasaki R, Morita K, Ashizawa M, Yamamoto C, Hatano K, Sato K, Ohmine K, Kanda Y. Relationship of tumor load parameters before and after autologous stem cell transplantation with clinical prognosis in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma: A retrospective analysis. Leuk Res 2021; 112:106750. [PMID: 34798568 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
We retrospectively examined 57 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at our institution. A receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed that the reduction rate of quantitative serum monoclonal protein (M-protein) before ASCT and the difference in involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) 30 days after ASCT, respectively, had the greatest predictive value for all patients (area under the curve [AUC] 0.791 and 0.660, respectively). Based on the ROC curve-based cutoff values of tumor burden parameters, progression-free survival (PFS) in the high serum M-protein reduction (≥90 %) group was significantly better than that in the low serum M-protein reduction group (<90 %) (2-year PFS 79.5 % vs. 17.0 %, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in PFS between the low (<5.2 mg/L) and high (≥5.2 mg/L) dFLC groups (2-year PFS, 72.0 % vs. 46.0 %; p = 0.149). A multivariate analysis identified the reduction in serum M-protein as an independent predictive factor before ASCT for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.287, p = 0.022) and high dFLC on day 30 after ASCT for PFS (HR 3.902, p = 0.040). These results demonstrate that a good prognosis can be expected with a reduction of serum M-protein before and after ASCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Minakata
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Division of Cell Transplantation and Transfusion, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Rui Murahashi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hirotomo Nakashima
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Sae Matsuoka
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takashi Ikeda
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichiro Kawaguchi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yumiko Toda
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shoko Ito
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takashi Nagayama
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kiyomi Mashima
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kento Umino
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Nakano
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Ryoko Yamasaki
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kaoru Morita
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Masahiro Ashizawa
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Chihiro Yamamoto
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kaoru Hatano
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kazuya Sato
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Ken Ohmine
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Kanda
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Management of suboptimal response to induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Re-induction therapy or direct to Radiotherapy? Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:185-191. [PMID: 34453953 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unsatisfactory tumor response to induction chemotherapy (IC) is an adverse prognostic factor of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). A re-induction strategy which applies additional cycles of an alternative IC regimen prior to radiotherapy (RT) has been adopted. METHODS A total of 419 LANPC patients who attained suboptimal response (stable disease or disease progression) according to the Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline after initial IC were retrospectively included. They were divided into those who received additional cycles of re-induction regimen prior to RT (re-induction group, n = 87) and those who had no additional chemotherapy (direct to RT group, n = 332). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential confounders. Tumor response and long-term survival were compared between two groups. RESULTS After receiving a second IC regimen, 39.1% of the patients in re-induction group attained partial response; however, the tumor control of subsequent RT was not significantly improved when compared with direct to RT group (patients attaining complete response after RT 55.2% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.757). Patients who received re-induction therapy showed worse locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those proceeded directly to RT (3-year LRFS 75.7% vs. 83.1%, P = 0.005; 3-year PFS 62.4% vs. 68.3%, P = 0.037). The increased hematological toxicities were observed in re-induction group that included grade 3-4 anemia, thrombocytopenia and liver enzyme increase. CONCLUSION Re-induction therapy decreased LRFS and PFS and increased toxicities among patients who attain suboptimal response to initial IC regimen, as compared with direct to RT strategy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Parrondo RD, Ailawadhi S, Sher T, Chanan-Khan AA, Roy V. Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Therapies. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 16:56-66. [PMID: 32045556 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the evolution of the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) over the past decade, autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an integral part of the treatment of patients with both newly diagnosed and relapsed MM. The advent of novel therapies, such as immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies, has led to unprecedented levels of deep hematologic responses. Nonetheless, studies show that ASCT has an additive effect leading to additional deepening of responses. As the therapeutic agents for MM continue to evolve, the timing, duration, and sequence of their use in combination with ASCT will be crucial to understand to obtain the deepest response and survival benefit for patients with MM. This review aims to discuss the role of ASCT for the management of MM, with a particular focus on the role of ASCT in the context of novel therapies and minimal residual disease.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lemieux C, Muffly LS, Iberri DJ, Craig JK, Johnston LJ, Lowsky R, Shiraz P, Rezvani AR, Frank MJ, Weng WK, Meyer E, Shizuru JA, Arai S, Liedtke M, Negrin RS, Miklos DB, Sidana S. Outcomes after delayed and second autologous stem cell transplant in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2021; 56:2664-2671. [PMID: 34163014 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01371-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated the outcomes of 168 patients undergoing delayed or second autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) from 2010 to 2019. Overall, 21% (n = 35) patients had received a prior transplant and 69% (n = 116) underwent transplant at first relapse. Overall, 27% patients had high-risk cytogenetics and 15% had ISS stage III disease. Stem cell collection was performed after relapse in 72% and 35% of patients received maintenance therapy. Median PFS from salvage treatment and transplant were 28 and 19 months, respectively. Median OS from salvage treatment and transplant was 69 and 55 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that ASCT in first relapse was associated with superior PFS (HR 0.63, p = 0.03) and OS (HR 0.59, p = 0.04) compared to later lines of therapy. In addition, PFS of ≥36 months with prior therapy was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.62, p = 0.04) and OS (HR 0.41, p = 0.01). Ninety-five patients underwent delayed transplant at first relapse, median PFS and OS from start of therapy was 30 and 69 months, and median OS from diagnosis was 106 months. These data may serve as a guide when counseling patients undergoing ASCT for relapsed MM and provide a benchmark in designing clinical trials of transplantation/comparative treatments for relapsed MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Lemieux
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Lori S Muffly
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David J Iberri
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Juliana K Craig
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Robert Lowsky
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Parveen Shiraz
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Matthew J Frank
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Wen-Kai Weng
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Everett Meyer
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Sally Arai
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Robert S Negrin
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David B Miklos
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Surbhi Sidana
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mohan M, Hari P, Szabo A, Dhakal B, Chhabra S, D'Souza A. Long term follow up of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with pembrolizumab consolidation post-autologous stem cell transplantation. Leuk Res 2021; 109:106648. [PMID: 34182226 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Meera Mohan
- Medical College of Wisconsin, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Garderet L, Sbianchi G, Iacobelli S, Blaise D, Byrne JL, Remenyi P, Apperley JF, Touzeau C, Isaksson C, Browne P, Mayer J, Lenhoff S, Gonzalez Muniz S, Parody Porras R, Basak G, Poire X, Trneny M, Nagler A, Michieli M, Tanase A, Koster L, Hayden PJ, Beksac M, Schönland S, Yakoub-Agha I. Prognostic impact of early-versus-late responses to different induction regimens in patients with myeloma undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: Results from the CALM study by the CMWP of the EBMT. Eur J Haematol 2021; 106:708-715. [PMID: 33580608 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)-eligible myeloma patients, prolonged induction does not necessarily improve the depth of response. METHOD We analyzed 1222 ASCT patients who were classified based on (a) the interval between induction and stem cell collection, (b) the type of induction regimen: BID (Bortezomib, IMiDs, and Dexamethasone), Bortezomib-based, or CTD (Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone), and (c) the time to best response (Early ie, best response within 4 or 5 months, depending on the regimen vs Late; Good ie, VGPR or better vs Poor). RESULTS The length of induction treatment required to achieve a Good response did not affect PFS (P = .65) or OS (P = .61) post-ASCT. The three types of regimen resulted in similar outcomes: median PFS 31, 27.7 and 30.8 months (P = .31), and median OS 81.7, 92.7, and 77.4 months, respectively (P = .83). On multivariate analysis, neither the type nor the duration of the induction regimen affected OS and PFS, except for Early Good Responders who had a better PFS compared to Early Poor Responders (HR = 1.21, P-value = .02). However, achieving a Good response at induction was associated with a better response (≥VGPR) post-transplant. CONCLUSION The kinetics of response did not affect outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Garderet
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR_S 938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine- Team Proliferation and Differentiation of Stem Cells, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Service d'Hématologie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter Remenyi
- Dél-pesti Centrumkórház - Országos Hematológiai és Infektológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | | | - Paul Browne
- Hope Directorate St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jiri Mayer
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | - Xavier Poire
- Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marek Trneny
- Charles University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Arnon Nagler
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Patrick J Hayden
- Department of Haematology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Meral Beksac
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Stefan Schönland
- Medical Department V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha
- University Hospital of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, INSERM, Infinite, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Visram A, Vaxman I, S Al Saleh A, Parmar H, Dispenzieri A, Kapoor P, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Hayman SR, Dingli D, Warsame R, Kourelis T, Siddiqui M, Gonsalves W, Muchtar E, Lust JA, Leung N, Kyle RA, Murray D, Rajkumar SV, Kumar S. Disease monitoring with quantitative serum IgA levels provides a more reliable response assessment in multiple myeloma patients. Leukemia 2021; 35:1428-1437. [PMID: 33623138 PMCID: PMC8102180 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01180-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Unlike IgG monoclonal proteins (MCPs), IgA MCP quantification is unreliable due to beta-migration of IgA MCPs on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP). The utility of nephelometric quantitative IgA (qIgA) to monitor IgA multiple myeloma (MM) is unclear. We retrospectively studied disease response kinetics using qIgA versus MCPs by SPEP, and developed and validated novel qIgA disease assessment criteria in 491 IgA MM patients. The SPEP MCP nadir occurred a median of 41 (IQR 0-102) days before the qIgA. The median time to achieve a partial response (PR) was shorter using standard IMWG versus qIgA response criteria (32 vs 58 days, p < 0.001). Stratification by qIgA criteria, unlike IMWG criteria, led to clear separation of the progression-free survival curves of patients achieving a PR or very good PR. There was a consistent trend toward earlier detection of disease progression using qIgA versus IMWG progression criteria. In conclusion, monitoring IgA MM using MCP-based IMWG criteria may be falsely reassuring, given that MCP levels on SPEP decrease faster than qIgA levels. The qIgA response criteria more accurately stratify patients based on the progression risk and may detect disease progression earlier, which may lead to more consistent measurement of trial endpoints and improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa Visram
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iuliana Vaxman
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikvah, Israel.,Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Abdullah S Al Saleh
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Hematology and HSCT, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Harsh Parmar
- Division of Hematology, John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Martha Q Lacy
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - David Dingli
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rahma Warsame
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Eli Muchtar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John A Lust
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nelson Leung
- Division of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert A Kyle
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Murray
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Devarakonda S, Efebera Y, Sharma N. Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:863. [PMID: 33670709 PMCID: PMC7922596 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) has been the standard of care in eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Outcomes of patients with MM have improved significantly due to the advent of several novel drugs. Upfront use of these drugs in induction therapy has significantly increased the rate and depth of responses that have translated into longer remission and survival. This has now raised a debate regarding the role and relevance of auto-SCT in the management of myeloma. However, clinical trials have confirmed the utility of auto-SCT even in the era of novel drugs. Tandem auto-SCT followed by maintenance has shown a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in high-risk MM, and hence can be considered in young and fit patients with high-risk disease. Auto-SCT has the advantages of resetting the bone marrow microenvironment, short-lived toxicity compared to the long-term physical and financial toxicities of continued chemotherapy in the absence of SCT, very low transplant-related mortality (TRM) in high volume centers, and providing longer disease-free survival when followed by maintenance therapy. Allogeneic SCT is one potentially curative option for MM, albeit with an increased risk of death due to high TRM. Strategies to modulate the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) while maintaining or improving the graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect could place allogeneic SCT back in the treatment armamentarium of MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yvonne Efebera
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (S.D.); (N.S.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Giralt S. Primary refractory multiple myeloma - what role for high dose melphalan? Leuk Lymphoma 2020; 61:2785. [PMID: 33222564 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1811276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Giralt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vaxman I, Sidiqi MH, Al Saleh AS, Kumar S, Muchtar E, Dispenzieri A, Buadi F, Dingli D, Lacy M, Hayman S, Leung N, Gonsalves W, Kourelis T, Warsame R, Hogan W, Gertz M. Depth of response prior to autologous stem cell transplantation predicts survival in light chain amyloidosis. Bone Marrow Transplant 2020; 56:928-935. [PMID: 33208916 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-01136-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The goal of therapy in AL amyloidosis is to inhibit further production of the amyloidogenic light chains, thereby allowing organ recovery and improving survival. We aimed to assess the impact of depth of hematologic response prior to ASCT on survival. We conducted a retrospective study of 128 newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients who received induction prior to ASCT between January 2007 and August 2017 at Mayo Clinic. The overall response rate to induction was 86% (CR 18%, VGPR 31% and PR 38%). With a median follow up of 52 months, the median PFS and OS was 48.5 months and not reached, respectively. Response depth to induction therapy was associated with improved PFS and OS. The median PFS was not reached for patients achieving ≥VGPR prior to ASCT and 34.1 months for patients achieving PR or less (P = 0.0009). The median OS was longer in patients with deeper responses (not reached for ≥VGPR vs. 128 months for PR or less (P = 0.02)). On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of OS were melphalan conditioning dose (RR = 0.42; P = 0.036) and depth of response prior to transplant (RR 0.37; P = 0.0295). Hematologic response prior to transplant predicts improved post transplant outcomes in AL amyloidosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliana Vaxman
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel.,Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - M Hasib Sidiqi
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Abdullah S Al Saleh
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eli Muchtar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Francis Buadi
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Dingli
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martha Lacy
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Nelson Leung
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Rahma Warsame
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William Hogan
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Morie Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dhakal B, D'Souza A, Callander N, Chhabra S, Fraser R, Davila O, Anderson K, Assal A, Badawy SM, Berdeja J, Cerny J, Comenzo R, Chakraborty R, Peter Gale R, Kamble R, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Krem M, Ganguly S, Janakiram M, Kansagra A, Munker R, Murthy H, Patel S, Kumar S, Shah N, Qazilbash M, Hari P. Novel prognostic scoring system for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2020; 191:442-452. [PMID: 33094839 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We studied 2,528 patients with upfront autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) from 2008-2017 to develop a prognostic model to predict outcomes. High-risk cytogenetics included t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del13q on karyotype, del17p, +1q or 1pdel. A Cox model identified factors prognostic of progression/relapse in a training subset (n = 1,246). A weighted score using these factors was assigned to a validation cohort (n = 774). Presence of high-risk cytogenetics [hazard ratio, (HR) 1·68 (1·3-2·17)] and pre-AHCT bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) ≥10% [1·68 (1·33-2·12)] were assigned 4 points each; albumin at diagnosis <3·5 g/dl [1·31 (1·07-1·61)] 2; standard risk cytogenetics 1, and no cytogenetics abnormality, BMPCs <10% at AHCT and albumin ≥3·5 g/dl at diagnosis 0 points each. A three-category system with low risk (0-3), intermediate risk (4-8) and high risk (9-10) showed 3-year progression-free survival in the low vs. intermediate vs. high risk of 58% (95% CI: 52-63) vs. 49% (95% CI: 43-56) vs. 31% (95% CI: 12-51), P < 0.001 respectively, and 3-year OS in low vs. intermediate vs. high risk of 88% (95% CI: 84-91) vs. 81% (95% CI: 76-86) vs. 64% (95% CI: 39-80); P < 0·001. Our prognostic scoring system can identify MM patients at risk for early relapse after AHCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binod Dhakal
- BMT and Cellular Therapy, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Anita D'Souza
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Saurabh Chhabra
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Raphael Fraser
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Omar Davila
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Amer Assal
- Department of Medicine, Bone Marrow Transplant and Cell Therapy Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sherif M Badawy
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jan Cerny
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Robert Peter Gale
- Haematology Research Centre, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rammurti Kamble
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Maxwell Krem
- University of Louisville Hospital/James Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Siddhartha Ganguly
- Division of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Ankit Kansagra
- UT Southwestern Medical Center - BMT Program, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Reinhold Munker
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Hemant Murthy
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sagar Patel
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nina Shah
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Parameswaran Hari
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The impact of response kinetics for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. Blood Adv 2020; 3:2895-2904. [PMID: 31594763 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid remission by induction therapy has long been recognized as an important predictor for long-time survival in acute leukemia. However, the impact of response kinetics on multiple myeloma (MM) seems to be different and remains unexplored. The relationship between response kinetics and outcome were assessed in 626 patients with newly diagnosed MM who were included in a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial (BDH 2008/02). Patients were assigned to either immunomodulatory drug- or proteasome inhibitor-based therapy. The response depth, time to best response (TBR) and duration of best response (DBR) were collected. Depth of response was associated with superior outcomes, consistent with findings from other studies. However, the early responders (defined as TBR ≤3 months) showed significantly worse survival compared with late responders. We found that patients with rapid complete remission experienced inferior survivals comparable to those attaining a gradual partial remission. Moreover, 4 distinct response kinetics patterns were identified. Patients with gradual and sustained remission ("U-valley" pattern) experienced superior outcomes, whereas poor outcomes were observed in rapid and transient responders ("roller coaster" pattern) (median overall survival, 126 vs 30 months). The effects of response patterns on survival were confirmed in patients at different stages of disease and cytogenetic risk, including transplant-eligible patients and those attaining different extents of response depth. Collectively, our data indicated that slow and gradual response is a favorable prognostic factor in MM. In addition to response depth, the kinetic pattern of response is a simple and powerful predictor for survival even in the era of novel agents.
Collapse
|
26
|
Jurczyszyn A, Waszczuk-Gajda A, Castillo JJ, Krawczyk K, Stork M, Pour L, Usnarska-Zubkiewicz L, Potoczek S, Hus I, Davila Valls J, Hari P, Chhabra S, Gentile M, Mikala G, Varga G, Chim CS, Fiala M, Vij R, Schutz N, Rodzaj M, Porowska A, Vesole DH, Druzd-Sitek A, Walewski J, Nooka AK. Primary refractory multiple myeloma: a real-world experience with 85 cases. Leuk Lymphoma 2020; 61:2868-2875. [DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1788014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Artur Jurczyszyn
- Department of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Anna Waszczuk-Gajda
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jorge J. Castillo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katarzyna Krawczyk
- Department of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Martin Stork
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ludek Pour
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lidia Usnarska-Zubkiewicz
- Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Stanisław Potoczek
- Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Iwona Hus
- Medical University of Lublin, Lublin Poland
| | | | - Parameswaran Hari
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Saurabh Chhabra
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Gabor Mikala
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, South-Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Hematology and Infectology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gergely Varga
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Chor Sang Chim
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Mark Fiala
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MS, USA
| | - Ravi Vij
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MS, USA
| | - Natalia Schutz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marek Rodzaj
- Department of Hematology, Regional Specialistic Hospital, Cracow, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Porowska
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior, Warsaw, Poland
| | - David H. Vesole
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | | | - Jan Walewski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ajay K. Nooka
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ciftciler R, Goker H, Buyukasık Y, Aladag E, Demiroglu H. Impact of Pre-transplant and Post-transplant Remission Status of Patients on Survival in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2019; 35:655-661. [PMID: 31741617 DOI: 10.1007/s12288-019-01108-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The overall survival (OS) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has increased in the last decade due to the introduction of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and monoclonal antibodies as well as an extensive combination of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for suitable patients. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of pre-transplant and post-transplant remission status of patients on survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Two hundred and four patients with newly diagnosed MM who received an ASCT in our HSC transplant center at Hacettepe University Hospital between the years of 2001 and 2018 were evaluated in a retrospective manner. The median follow-up period was 35.9 months (range 4.2-206.4) for the entire group. The 5-year OS for pre-transplant remission status CR/VGPR patients and pre-transplant remission status PR or less patients were 79% and 68%, respectively (p = 0.09). The 5-year PFS for pre-transplant remission status CR/VGPR patients and pre-transplant remission status PR or less patients were 62% and 45%, respectively (p = 0.23). The 5-year OS for post-transplant remission status CR/VGPR group was 72% and for post-transplant remission status PR or less group was 60% (p = 0.02). The 5-year PFS in post-transplant remission status CR/VGPR patients was 48% and post-transplant remission status PR or less patients was 36% (p = 0.03). This study focuses on determination of survival outcome based on the best response obtained before and after ASCT and particularly highlights the significance of reaching CR and VGPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafiye Ciftciler
- Departments of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Goker
- Departments of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yahya Buyukasık
- Departments of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elifcan Aladag
- Departments of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Haluk Demiroglu
- Departments of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Soekojo CY, Kumar SK. Stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: how far have we come? Ther Adv Hematol 2019; 10:2040620719888111. [PMID: 31798820 PMCID: PMC6859676 DOI: 10.1177/2040620719888111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
High-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has historically been an essential part of multiple myeloma (MM) management since early studies demonstrated its efficacy in relapsed disease, and subsequent phase III trials demonstrated better responses and improved survival with this modality compared with standard chemotherapy. With further advances in the MM treatment landscape, including the development of potent novel agents, there has been an increasing debate around various aspects of ASCT, including the optimal timing, role of single versus tandem ASCT, and the practice of consolidation and maintenance therapy post-ASCT. Routine incorporation of the novel agents at each of the treatment phases, induction, consolidation when used, and maintenance has led to better responses as reflected by increasing rates of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, longer progression-free survival (PFS) with improvement in overall survival (OS) and in some of the trials. The phase III trials over the last decade have provided significant clarity on the current approach, and have raised important questions regarding the applicability of this modality in all patients. This review aims to summarize the latest literature in the field and discusses how these findings impact the practice of ASCT today.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinnie Y. Soekojo
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shaji K. Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gertz MA. Management of induction failures in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2019; 61:1-3. [PMID: 31502884 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1663424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Blocka J, Hielscher T, Mueller-Tidow C, Goldschmidt H, Hillengass J. Salvage therapy versus upfront autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients with progressive disease after first-line induction therapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2019; 61:27-36. [PMID: 31423866 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1646905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
It is a matter of debate whether myeloma patients with progressive disease (PD) after induction should receive salvage therapy or proceed directly to autologous stem cell transplantation. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1599 patients treated between 1991 and 2016 at the University Hospital of Heidelberg and other centers. Deepening of response through salvage therapy did not lead to better progression-free or overall survival (PD versus salvage therapy patients: HR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.28, 1.80], p = 0.5 and HR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.30, 1.95], p = 0.6, respectively), neither in patients treated with novel agents (HR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.23, 1.85], p = 0.4 and HR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.27, 2.15], p = 0.6) nor older regimens (HR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.36, 2.07], p = 0.7 and HR = 0.8, 95% CI [0.34, 1.91], p = 0.6). Therefore, primary nonresponders might benefit from a direct transplant rather than salvage induction, although the analyzed salvage therapy cohort was small (n = 23) and cytogenetics was not included in the multivariable analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Blocka
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Mueller-Tidow
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Miller KC, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Hayman SR, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri AA, Dingli D, Kapoor P, Gonsalves WI, Kourelis T, Muchtar E, Hogan WJ, Kumar SK. The impact of re-induction prior to salvage autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2019; 54:2039-2050. [PMID: 31190005 PMCID: PMC6893102 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0590-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an integral component of the therapeutic arsenal in multiple myeloma. Given that overall survival (OS) is comparable between patients receiving up-front or delayed ASCT, some opt to collect stem cells and postpone transplant until the time of disease progression (i.e. salvage ASCT). It is unknown if induction should be repeated prior to salvage ASCT, or if patients should proceed directly. We identified 234 patients who underwent salvage ASCT at our institution: 188 (80%) were re-induced, whereas 46 (20%) proceeded directly without re-induction. There was no significant difference in time to next therapy (TNT) or OS from Day 0 between the two groups. Patients who were re-induced had a nonsignificant trend towards a higher rate of complete response post-ASCT (45% vs. 33%, p= .12). In multivariate models, re-induction did not affect TNT/OS. In the subgroup of 188 patients who were re-induced, patients with relapsed/refractory disease at the time of ASCT had significantly shorter TNT/OS compared to patients with deeper pre-ASCT responses. In summary, there was no survival difference for patients who were re-induced before salvage ASCT. However, many factors affect the decision to re-induce, and prospective studies would be required to discern its role definitively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Francis K Buadi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Suzanne R Hayman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martha Q Lacy
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - David Dingli
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Prashant Kapoor
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wilson I Gonsalves
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Taxiarchis Kourelis
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eli Muchtar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William J Hogan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shaji K Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kulkarni U, Devasia AJ, Korula A, Fouzia NA, Nisham PN, Samoon YJ, Lakshmi KM, Abraham A, Srivastava A, Mathews V, George B. Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Post-Autologous Transplantation-A Single Centre Experience. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2019; 35:215-222. [PMID: 30988555 DOI: 10.1007/s12288-018-0989-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
There is paucity of data from developing countries on the clinical outcomes in myeloma post-autologous transplantation. In this retrospective study, we used hospital records to retrieve data of patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from January 1995 to December 2014 at our centre. During the study period, 245 patients underwent ASCT for myeloma. Of these, 19%, 37% and 37% were in complete response, very good partial response and partial response respectively at the time of ASCT. Only in 14 (5.7%) patients, the stem cells were cryopreserved. The transplant related mortality was 2.86%. The median follow up was 40.7 months (range 0-237.4 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 61.6% ± 3.8% and 37.2% ± 3.9% respectively. Independent predictors of OS included mononuclear cell dose infused, pre- and post-transplant response; and the use of maintenance therapy. Independent predictors of PFS included age at diagnosis, pre- and post-transplant response; and the use of maintenance therapy. In a resource limited setting, ASCT for myeloma is associated with low transplant related mortality. Pre- and post-transplant response and maintenance therapy are predictors of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uday Kulkarni
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - Anup J Devasia
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - Anu Korula
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - N A Fouzia
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - P N Nisham
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - Yasir J Samoon
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - Kavitha M Lakshmi
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - Aby Abraham
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - Alok Srivastava
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - Vikram Mathews
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| | - Biju George
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, Costello C, Dhodapkar MV, Kumar S, Lacy M, Lipe B, Little RF, Nikonova A, Omel J, Peswani N, Prica A, Raje N, Seth R, Vesole DH, Walker I, Whitley A, Wildes TM, Wong SW, Martin T. Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1228-1263. [PMID: 30932732 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 180] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations on the treatment of multiple myeloma to practicing physicians and others. METHODS ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and some phase II studies published from 2005 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, progression-free survival, response rate, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed for patients with multiple myeloma who are transplantation eligible and those who are ineligible and for patients with relapsed or refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mikhael
- 1 City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ.,2 International Myeloma Foundation, North Hollywood, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brea Lipe
- 8 University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Anna Nikonova
- 10 Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Omel
- 11 Education and Advocacy, Grand Island, NE
| | | | - Anca Prica
- 13 Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Noopur Raje
- 14 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rahul Seth
- 15 Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - David H Vesole
- 16 Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ.,17 Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Irwin Walker
- 18 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Sandy W Wong
- 21 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tom Martin
- 21 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Dosani T, Covut F, Pinto R, Kim BG, Ali N, Beck R, Maitta R, Downes K, Fox R, Reese J, de Lima M, Malek E. Impact of lenalidomide on collected hematopoietic myeloid and erythroid progenitors: peripheral stem cell collection may not be affected. Leuk Lymphoma 2019; 60:2199-2206. [DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1573367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Talib Dosani
- Internal Medicine Department, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Fahrettin Covut
- Stem Cell Transplant Program University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Raisa Pinto
- Stem Cell Transplant Program University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Byung-Gyu Kim
- Pediatrics & Angie Fowler AYA Cancer Institute Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Naveed Ali
- Stem Cell Transplant Program University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rose Beck
- Pathology Department, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert Maitta
- Pathology Department, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Katharine Downes
- Pathology Department, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert Fox
- Cellular Therapy Lab Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jane Reese
- Cellular Therapy Lab Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marcos de Lima
- Stem Cell Transplant Program University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ehsan Malek
- Stem Cell Transplant Program University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gonsalves WI, Buadi FK, Ailawadhi S, Bergsagel PL, Chanan Khan AA, Dingli D, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, Hayman SR, Kapoor P, Kourelis TV, Lacy MQ, Larsen JT, Muchtar E, Reeder CB, Sher T, Stewart AK, Warsame R, Go RS, Kyle RA, Leung N, Lin Y, Lust JA, Russell SJ, Zeldenrust SR, Fonder AL, Hwa YL, Hobbs MA, Mayo AA, Hogan WJ, Rajkumar SV, Kumar SK, Gertz MA, Roy V. Utilization of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple myeloma: a Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus statement. Bone Marrow Transplant 2019; 54:353-367. [PMID: 29988062 PMCID: PMC6463224 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-018-0264-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2018] [Revised: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Over the last two decades, the utilization of various novel therapies in the upfront or salvage settings has continued to improve survival outcomes for patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM). Thus, the conventional role for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in MM either in the form of an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or an allogeneic stem cell transplant (Allo-SCT) warrants re-evaluation, given the aforementioned clinical advances. Here, we present a consensus statement of our multidisciplinary group of over 30 Mayo Clinic physicians with a special interest in the care of patients with MM and provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of HSCT in MM. We specifically address topics that include the role and timing of an ASCT for MM in the era of novel agents, eligibility for an ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation, and maintenance options, and finally the utility of an upfront tandem ASCT, salvage second ASCT, and an allo-SCT in MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francis K Buadi
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sikander Ailawadhi
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - P Leif Bergsagel
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Asher A Chanan Khan
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - David Dingli
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Rafael Fonseca
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Susan R Hayman
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Prashant Kapoor
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Martha Q Lacy
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeremy T Larsen
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Eli Muchtar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Craig B Reeder
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Taimur Sher
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - A Keith Stewart
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Rahma Warsame
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ronald S Go
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert A Kyle
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nelson Leung
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yi Lin
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John A Lust
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Amie L Fonder
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yi L Hwa
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Miriam A Hobbs
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Angela A Mayo
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - William J Hogan
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Shaji K Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Vivek Roy
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pros and cons of frontline autologous transplant in multiple myeloma: the debate over timing. Blood 2019; 133:652-659. [DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-825349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma has dramatically changed over the past decade with the introduction of several new classes of drugs, which are very effective at controlling the disease for prolonged periods of time, especially when used in multidrug combinations. Prior to the advent of these new agents, peripheral blood autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was the mainstay of therapy for patients who were eligible to undergo the procedure, with deep and durable responses in the majority of patients. Despite the introduction of more effective therapies, ASCT continues to play an important role in overall management of younger patients, where it has been integrated with the other therapeutic approaches to provide maximum benefit. Recent phase 3 trials have once again confirmed the survival benefit associated with ASCT in myeloma. Retrospective studies have also demonstrated the feasibility of using ASCT at the time of first relapse rather than as a component of the initial treatment. Significant geographical variations exist in the use of ASCT, especially between the United States and Europe in terms of its use as part of upfront therapy. Much of these differences are driven by the availability of drugs and drug combinations for initial therapy of myeloma as well as maintenance approaches post-ASCT. It is amply clear from these trials that ASCT will continue to play an important role in management of myeloma and is likely to be used as a platform for enhancing the efficacy of other treatment modalities that are currently in development.
Collapse
|
37
|
Gopalakrishnan S, D'Souza A, Scott E, Fraser R, Davila O, Shah N, Gale RP, Kamble R, Diaz MA, Lazarus HM, Savani BN, Hildebrandt GC, Solh M, Freytes CO, Lee C, Kyle RA, Usmani SZ, Ganguly S, Assal A, Berdeja J, Kanate AS, Dhakal B, Meehan K, Kindwall-Keller T, Saad A, Locke F, Seo S, Nishihori T, Gergis U, Gasparetto C, Mark T, Nieto Y, Kumar S, Hari P. Revised International Staging System Is Predictive and Prognostic for Early Relapse (<24 months) after Autologous Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2018; 25:683-688. [PMID: 30579965 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The revised International Staging System (R-ISS) combines ISS with genetic markers and lactate dehydrogenase and can prognosticate newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Early relapse (<24 months) after upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) strongly predicts inferior overall survival (OS). We examined the ability of R-ISS in predicting early relapse and its independent prognostic effect on postrelapse survival after an early relapse. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database we identified MM patients receiving first AHCT within 18 months after diagnosis with available R-ISS stage at diagnosis (n = 628). Relative risks of relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were calculated with the R-ISS group as a predictor in multivariate analysis. Among early relapsers, postrelapse survival was tested to identify factors affecting postrelapse OS. The cumulative incidence of early relapse was 23%, 39%, and 50% for R-ISS I, R-ISS II, and R-ISS III, respectively (P < .001). Shorter PFS and OS were seen with higher stage R-ISS. R-ISS was independently predictive for inferior postrelapse OS among early relapsers, as was the presence of ≥3 comorbidities and the use of ≥2 induction chemotherapy lines. R-ISS stage at diagnosis predicts early post-AHCT relapse and independently affects postrelapse survival among early relapsers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anita D'Souza
- CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Emma Scott
- Center for Hematologic Malignancies, The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Raphael Fraser
- CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Omar Davila
- CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Nina Shah
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Peter Gale
- Hematology Research Centre, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rammurti Kamble
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Miguel Angel Diaz
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hillard M Lazarus
- Seidman Cancer Center, Division of Hematology Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bipin N Savani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Melhem Solh
- The Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Cindy Lee
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Saad Z Usmani
- Department of Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Siddhartha Ganguly
- Division of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Amer Assal
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Abraham S Kanate
- Osborn Hematopoietic Malignancy and Transplantation Program, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Binod Dhakal
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Division of Hematology Oncology; Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Kenneth Meehan
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Tamila Kindwall-Keller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ayman Saad
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Frederick Locke
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sachiko Seo
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, National Cancer Research Center East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Taiga Nishihori
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Usama Gergis
- Hematolgic Malignancies & Bone Marrow Transplant, Department of Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Tomer Mark
- University of Colorado Hospital, Division of Hematology Oncology; Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Parameswaran Hari
- CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Scott EC, Hari P, Kumar S, Fraser R, Davila O, Shah N, Gale RP, Diaz MA, Agrawal V, Cornell RF, Ganguly S, Akpek G, Freytes C, Hashmi S, Malek E, Kamble RT, Lazarus H, Solh M, Usmani SZ, Kanate AS, Saad A, Chhabra S, Gergis U, Cerny J, Kyle RA, Lee C, Kindwall-Keller T, Assal A, Hildebrandt GC, Holmberg L, Maziarz RT, Nishihori T, Seo S, Kumar S, Mark T, D'Souza A. Staging Systems for Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The Revised International Staging System Shows the Most Differentiation between Groups. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2018; 24:2443-2449. [PMID: 30142419 PMCID: PMC6293469 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) and the International Myeloma Working Group 2014 (IMWG 2014) are newer staging systems used to prognosticate multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes. We hypothesized that these would provide better prognostic differentiation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) compared with ISS. We analyzed the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database from 2008 to 2014 to compare the 3 systems (N = 628) among newly diagnosed MM patients undergoing upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). The median follow-up of survivors was 48 (range, 3 to 99) months. The R-ISS provided the greatest differentiation between survival curves for each stage (for overall survival [OS], the differentiation was 1.74 using the R-ISS, 1.58 using ISS, and 1.60 using the IMWG 2014) . Univariate analyses at 3 years for OS showed R-ISS I at 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83% to 93%), II at 75% (95% CI, 70% to 80%), and III at 56% (95% CI, 3% to 69%; P < .001). An integrated Brier score function demonstrated the R-ISS had the best prediction for PFS, though all systems had similar prediction for OS. Among available systems, the R-ISS is the most optimal among available prognostic tools for newly diagnosed MM undergoing AHCT. We recommend that serum lactate dehydrogenase and cytogenetic data be performed on every MM patient at diagnosis to allow accurate prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Scott
- Center for Hematologic Malignancies, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Parameswaran Hari
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Sathish Kumar
- Hematology/Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Raphael Fraser
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Omar Davila
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Nina Shah
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Peter Gale
- Hematology Research Centre, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Miguel Angel Diaz
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesus, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vaibhav Agrawal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Robert F Cornell
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Siddhartha Ganguly
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Gorgun Akpek
- Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Cesar Freytes
- School of Medicine, Texas Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Shahrukh Hashmi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ehsan Malek
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rammurti T Kamble
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Hillard Lazarus
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Melhem Solh
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Saad Z Usmani
- Department of Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Abraham S Kanate
- Osborn Hematopoietic Malignancy and Transplantation Program, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Ayman Saad
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Saurabh Chhabra
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Usama Gergis
- Hematolgic Malignancies & Bone Marrow Transplant, Department of Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jan Cerny
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Robert A Kyle
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Cindy Lee
- Department of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tamila Kindwall-Keller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Amer Assal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Gerhard C Hildebrandt
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Leona Holmberg
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Richard T Maziarz
- Adult Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Taiga Nishihori
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sachiko Seo
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, National Cancer Research Center East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tomer Mark
- University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anita D'Souza
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Giralt S, Seifter E. Case-based roundtable on treatment approach for young, fit, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2018; 2018:103-109. [PMID: 30504298 PMCID: PMC6245961 DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
With the advent new proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib, ixazomib), new immune-modulatory drugs (pomalidomide), and new monoclonal antibodies (elotuzimab, daratumumab) as approved treatments for myeloma, the therapeutic landscape for this disease has changed. In this chapter, using a case-based approach, I will provide a personal guide of how I approach myeloma therapy in a transplant eligible patient in 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Giralt
- Division of Hematologic Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Eric Seifter
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chakraborty R, Muchtar E, Kumar SK, Buadi FK, Dingli D, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR, Hogan WJ, Kapoor P, Lacy MQ, Leung N, Warsame R, Kourelis T, Gonsalves W, Gertz MA. Impact of duration of induction therapy on survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients undergoing upfront autologous stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2018; 182:71-77. [DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rajshekhar Chakraborty
- Division of Hematology; Mayo Clinic; Rochester MN USA
- Department of Hematology and Oncology; Cleveland Clinic; Taussig Cancer Institute; Cleveland OH USA
| | - Eli Muchtar
- Division of Hematology; Mayo Clinic; Rochester MN USA
| | | | | | - David Dingli
- Division of Hematology; Mayo Clinic; Rochester MN USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nelson Leung
- Division of Hematology; Mayo Clinic; Rochester MN USA
| | - Rahma Warsame
- Division of Hematology; Mayo Clinic; Rochester MN USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Aypar E, İzzettin FV, Akı ŞZ, Sancar M, Yeğin ZA, Türköz-Sucak G. Comparison of conditioning regimen toxicities among autologous stem cell transplantation eligible multiple myeloma patients: High-dose melphalan versus high-dose melphalan and bortezomib. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2017; 24:281-289. [PMID: 29284356 DOI: 10.1177/1078155217697486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) remains the standard of care for younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Currently, high-dose melphalan (HDM) is recommended as conditioning regimen before AHSCT. Preclinical data suggest that combining bortezomib and melphalan has synergistic effect against multiple myeloma cells. Bortezomib and HDM (Bor-HDM) combination as conditioning regimen has been investigated by many other investigators. Objective In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare transplant-related toxicities and hematologic recovery of HDM and Bor-HDM conditioning regimens. Method We retrospectively evaluated hematologic recovery and toxicity profile in patients with MM who received AHSCT with either HDM ( n = 114) or Bor-HDM ( n = 53) conditioning regimen. Results Nonhematologic toxicities were comparable between HDM and Bor-HDM conditioning regimen, except mucositis and diarrhea being more frequent in the Bor-HDM group. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment time and duration of hospital stay were significantly shorter for HDM regimen. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, we observed engraftment kinetics and duration of hospitalization were significantly worse in Bor-HDM conditioning regimen with manageable toxicities. Randomized studies are needed to further compare Bor- HDM regimen to HDM in terms of response rates, toxicities, and transplant-related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eda Aypar
- 1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Near East University, Nicosia, TRNC.,2 Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fikret Vehbi İzzettin
- 3 Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Şahika Zeynep Akı
- 2 Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mesut Sancar
- 3 Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Arzu Yeğin
- 2 Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gülsan Türköz-Sucak
- 2 Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Westin GF, Dias AL, Go RS. Exploring Big Data in Hematological Malignancies: Challenges and Opportunities. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2017; 11:271-9. [PMID: 27177742 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-016-0331-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Secondary analysis of large datasets has become a useful alternative to address research questions outside the reach of clinical trials. It is increasingly utilized in hematology and oncology. In this review, we provided an overview of some examples of commonly used large datasets in the USA and described common research themes that can be pursued using such a methodology. We selected a sample of 14 articles on adult hematologic malignancies published in 2015 and highlighted their contributions as well as limitations.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Databases, Factual
- Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Hematologic Neoplasms/economics
- Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology
- Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Hodgkin Disease/diagnosis
- Hodgkin Disease/economics
- Hodgkin Disease/pathology
- Hodgkin Disease/therapy
- Humans
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/economics
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/economics
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathology
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/therapy
- Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis
- Multiple Myeloma/economics
- Multiple Myeloma/pathology
- Multiple Myeloma/therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo F Westin
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ajoy L Dias
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ronald S Go
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Veltri LW, Milton DR, Delgado R, Shah N, Patel K, Nieto Y, Kebriaei P, Popat UR, Parmar S, Oran B, Ciurea S, Hosing C, Lee HC, Manasanch E, Orlowski RZ, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH, Bashir Q. Outcome of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory multiple myeloma. Cancer 2017; 123:3568-3575. [PMID: 28513828 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the introduction of effective, novel agents, the outcome of patients with refractory multiple myeloma remains poor, particularly those who are refractory to both proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs). Limited data are available on the role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in this population. METHODS Patients with refractory myeloma who underwent first autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) between March 2000 and October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Those who had primary refractory disease and those with relapsed and refractory disease were included. Disease that was refractory to at least 1 PI and at least 1 IMiD was classified as double-refractory multiple myeloma (DR-MM). RESULTS In total, 233 patients were identified, including 105 (45%) classified with DR-MM and 128 (55%) classified with nondouble-refractory myeloma (NDR-MM). At a median follow-up of 42 months for surviving patients, at least a partial response was observed in 188 patients (81%; 83 patients in the DR-MM group [79%] and 105 patients in the NDR-MM [82%]; P = .77). A near complete response or better was observed in 52 patients (22%; 25 patients in the DR-MM group [24%] and 27 patients in the NDR-MM group [21%]; P = .77). The median progression-free survival was 17.6 months (14.4 months in the DR-MM group and 18.2 months in the NDR-MM group), and the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 38% (35% in the DR-MM group and 40% in the NDR-MM group; P = .40). The median overall survival was 48 months (38.9 months in the DR-MM group and 56.6 months in the NDR-MM group), and the 2-year overall survival rate was 74% (71% in the DR-MM group and 76% in the NDR-MM group; P = .27). CONCLUSIONS The current findings indicate that auto-HCT is an effective and safe therapy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma, including those who are refractory to IMiDs and PIs. Cancer 2017;123:3568-75. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren W Veltri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ruby Delgado
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nina Shah
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina Patel
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simrit Parmar
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stefan Ciurea
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elisabet Manasanch
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cornell RF, D'Souza A, Kassim AA, Costa LJ, Innis-Shelton RD, Zhang MJ, Huang J, Abidi M, Aiello J, Akpek G, Bashey A, Bashir Q, Cerny J, Comenzo R, Diaz MA, Freytes C, Gale RP, Ganguly S, Hamadani M, Hashmi S, Holmberg L, Hossain N, Kamble RT, Kharfan-Dabaja M, Kindwall-Keller T, Kyle R, Kumar S, Lazarus H, Lee C, Maiolino A, Marks DI, Meehan K, Mikhael J, Nath R, Nishihori T, Olsson RF, Ramanathan M, Saad A, Seo S, Usmani S, Vesole D, Vij R, Vogl D, Wirk BM, Yared J, Krishnan A, Mark T, Nieto Y, Hari P. Maintenance versus Induction Therapy Choice on Outcomes after Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 23:269-277. [PMID: 27864161 PMCID: PMC5346183 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), cyclophosphamide (C), and dexamethasone (D) are components of the most commonly used modern doublet (RD, VD) or triplet (VRD, CVD) initial induction regimens before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) in the United States. In this study we evaluated 693 patients receiving "upfront" AHCT after initial induction therapy with modern doublet or triplet regimens using data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research from 2008 to 2013. Analysis was limited to those receiving a single AHCT after 1 line of induction therapy within 12 months from treatment initiation for MM. In multivariate analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were similar irrespective of induction regimen. However, high-risk cytogenetics and nonreceipt of post-transplant maintenance/consolidation therapy were associated with higher risk of relapse. Patients receiving post-transplant therapy had significantly improved 3-year PFS versus no post-transplant therapy (55% versus 39%, P = .0001). This benefit was most evident in patients not achieving at least a complete response post-AHCT (P = .005). In patients receiving upfront AHCT, the choice of induction regimen (doublet or triplet therapies) appears to be of lower impact than use of post-transplant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert F Cornell
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Anita D'Souza
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| | - Adetola A Kassim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Luciano J Costa
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Racquel D Innis-Shelton
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mei-Jie Zhang
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jiaxing Huang
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Muneer Abidi
- Division of BMT, Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Gorgun Akpek
- Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Asad Bashey
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jan Cerny
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worchester, Massachusetts
| | | | - Miguel Angel Diaz
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus, Madrid, Spain
| | - César Freytes
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System and University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Robert Peter Gale
- Hematology Research Centre, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Siddhartha Ganguly
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Mehdi Hamadani
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Leona Holmberg
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Rammurti T Kamble
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Tamila Kindwall-Keller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | | | - Hillard Lazarus
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Cindy Lee
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Angelo Maiolino
- Hospital Universitbrio Clementinio Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janerio, Rio de Janerio, Brazil
| | - David I Marks
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth Meehan
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Joe Mikhael
- Mayo Clinic Arizona and Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Rajneesh Nath
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worchester, Massachusetts
| | - Taiga Nishihori
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Richard F Olsson
- Division of Therapeutic Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research Sormland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Muthalagu Ramanathan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worchester, Massachusetts
| | - Ayman Saad
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Sachiko Seo
- National Cancer Research Center, East Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Saad Usmani
- Department of Hematology v Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - David Vesole
- John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack UMC, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | - Ravi Vij
- Divison of Hematology and Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dan Vogl
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Baldeep M Wirk
- Division of Bone Marrow Transplant, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jean Yared
- Blood & Marrow Transplantation Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Tomer Mark
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Parameswaran Hari
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rosko A, Giralt S, Mateos MV, Dispenzieri A. Myeloma in Elderly Patients: When Less Is More and More Is More. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2017; 37. [PMID: 28561667 PMCID: PMC6619424 DOI: 10.14694/edbk_175171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell malignancy that occurs among older adults and accounts for 15% of all hematologic malignancies in the United States. Thirty-five percent of patients are diagnosed at age 75 or older. Novel therapeutics and routine use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have led to substantial improvements in patient survival, although improvements have been more impressive among patients younger than age 65. Finding the balance between under- and overtreating elderly patients is one of the biggest challenges specific to them as a subgroup of patients with MM. Decision making about which therapies and their dose intensity and duration should be influenced by a patient's functional status, personal preferences, disease characteristics, and ability to tolerate therapy. ASCT should be considered for all patients younger than age 80, assuming that they are not frail. The attainment of a stringent complete response and minimal residual disease negativity is associated with improved progression-free and overall survival. Again, consideration of quality of life for these patients is paramount. Although there is a growing list of tools to sort through these issues, a fully integrated approach has not yet been finely tuned, leaving additional work to be done for the treatment of elderly patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Rosko
- From The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sergio Giralt
- From The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- From The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Angela Dispenzieri
- From The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rosko A, Giralt S, Mateos MV, Dispenzieri A. Myeloma in Elderly Patients: When Less Is More and More Is More. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2017; 37:575-585. [PMID: 28561667 PMCID: PMC6619424 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_175171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell malignancy that occurs among older adults and accounts for 15% of all hematologic malignancies in the United States. Thirty-five percent of patients are diagnosed at age 75 or older. Novel therapeutics and routine use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have led to substantial improvements in patient survival, although improvements have been more impressive among patients younger than age 65. Finding the balance between under- and overtreating elderly patients is one of the biggest challenges specific to them as a subgroup of patients with MM. Decision making about which therapies and their dose intensity and duration should be influenced by a patient's functional status, personal preferences, disease characteristics, and ability to tolerate therapy. ASCT should be considered for all patients younger than age 80, assuming that they are not frail. The attainment of a stringent complete response and minimal residual disease negativity is associated with improved progression-free and overall survival. Again, consideration of quality of life for these patients is paramount. Although there is a growing list of tools to sort through these issues, a fully integrated approach has not yet been finely tuned, leaving additional work to be done for the treatment of elderly patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Rosko
- From The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sergio Giralt
- From The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- From The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Angela Dispenzieri
- From The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Latifoltojar A, Hall‐Craggs M, Rabin N, Popat R, Bainbridge A, Dikaios N, Sokolska M, Rismani A, D'Sa S, Punwani S, Yong K. Whole body magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: early changes in lesional signal fat fraction predict disease response. Br J Haematol 2017; 176:222-233. [PMID: 27766627 PMCID: PMC5244686 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cross-sectional imaging techniques are being increasingly used for disease evaluation in patients with multiple myeloma. Whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) scanning is superior to plain radiography in baseline assessment of patients but changes following treatment have not been systematically explored. We carried out paired WB-MRI scans in 21 newly diagnosed patients prior to, and 8-weeks after, starting chemotherapy, and analysed stringently selected focal lesions (FLs) for parametric changes. A total of 323 FLs were evaluated, median 20 per patient. At 8 weeks, there was a reduction in estimated tumour volume (eTV), and an increase in signal fat fraction (sFF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the group as a whole (P < 0·001). Patients who achieved complete/very good partial response (CR/VGPR) to induction had a significantly greater increase in sFF compared to those achieving ≤ partial response (PR; P = 0·001). When analysed on a per-patient basis, all patients achieving CR/VGPR had a significant sFF increase in their FL's, in contrast to patients achieving ≤PR. sFF changes in patients reaching maximal response within 100 days (fast responders) were greater compared to slow responders (P = 0·001). Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis indicated that sFF changes at 8 weeks were the best biomarker (area under the Curve 0·95) for an inferior response (≤PR). We conclude that early lesional sFF changes may provide important information on depth of response, and are worthy of further prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margaret Hall‐Craggs
- Centre for Medical ImagingUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Clinical RadiologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Neil Rabin
- Department of HaematologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Rakesh Popat
- Department of HaematologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Alan Bainbridge
- Department of Medical PhysicsUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | | | - Magdalena Sokolska
- Department of Medical PhysicsUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Ali Rismani
- Department of HaematologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Shirley D'Sa
- Department of HaematologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Centre for Medical ImagingUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Clinical RadiologyUniversity College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Kwee Yong
- UCL Cancer Institute, HaematologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chakraborty R, Muchtar E, Kumar SK, Jevremovic D, Buadi FK, Dingli D, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR, Hogan WJ, Kapoor P, Lacy MQ, Leung N, Gertz MA. Risk stratification in myeloma by detection of circulating plasma cells prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in the novel agent era. Blood Cancer J 2016; 6:e512. [PMID: 27983726 PMCID: PMC5223152 DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2016.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of circulating plasma cells (CPCs) prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma has not been defined in the novel agent era. We evaluated the impact of pre-transplant CPCs, detected by six-color flow cytometry in patients undergoing early ASCT on post-transplant response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). CPCs were detected in 162 out of 840 (19.3%) patients, with the median number of CPCs being 58 per 150 000 events. Ninety-nine percent of patients had received proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulator-based induction. The incidence of post-transplant stringent complete response (sCR) in the subgroups with and without CPCs was 15% and 38%, respectively, (P<0.001). The median PFS in the subgroups with and without CPCs was 15.1 (95% confidence interval (CI), 12.5-17.8) and 29.6 months (95% CI, 26.2-32.8), respectively, and the median OS was 41.0 months (95% CI, 32.6-58.2) and not reached (NR) (95% CI, 99.1-NR), respectively, (P<0.001 for both). On multivariate analysis for OS, factors independently predictive of mortality were the presence of CPCs (hazard ratio (HR) 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.6; P<0.001) and sCR post transplant (HR 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P<0.001). Presence of CPCs prior to transplant has a high prognostic impact and should be prospectively validated in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Chakraborty
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Hospitalist Services, Essentia Health-St Joseph's Medical Center, Brainerd, MN, USA
| | - E Muchtar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - S K Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - D Jevremovic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - F K Buadi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - D Dingli
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A Dispenzieri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - S R Hayman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - W J Hogan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - P Kapoor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Q Lacy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - N Leung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M A Gertz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Malek E, de Lima M, Caimi P. Resistant or Sensitive: Time is of the Essence. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22:1907-1908. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/10/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
50
|
Chakraborty R, Muchtar E, Kumar SK, Buadi FK, Dingli D, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR, Hogan WJ, Kapoor P, Lacy MQ, Leung N, Gertz MA. Impact of pre-transplant bone marrow plasma cell percentage on post-transplant response and survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2016; 58:308-315. [DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1201572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|