1
|
Vozzella VJ, Bittner RA, Ranellone TS, Grimm KM, Palmer KN, Carpio AN, Abel QC, Moschonas EH, Bondi CO, Kline AE. A bridge to recovery: Acute amantadine prior to environmental enrichment after brain trauma augments cognitive benefit. Exp Neurol 2024; 373:114648. [PMID: 38081352 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) facilitates motor and cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Historically, EE has been provided immediately and continuously after TBI, but this paradigm does not model the clinic where rehabilitation is typically not initiated until after critical care. Yet, treating TBI early may facilitate recovery. Hence, we sought to provide amantadine (AMT) as a bridge therapy before commencing EE. It was hypothesized that bridging EE with AMT would augment motor and cognitive benefits. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact (2.8 mm deformation at 4 m/s) or sham surgery and then were housed in standard (STD) conditions where they received intraperitoneal AMT (10 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg) or saline vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg) beginning 24 h after surgery and once daily during the 6-day bridge phase or once daily for 19 days for the non-bridge groups (i.e., continuously STD-housed) to compare the effects of acute AMT plus EE vs. chronic AMT alone. Abbreviated EE, which was presented to closer emulate clinical rehabilitation (e.g., 6 h/day), began on day 7 for the AMT bridge and chronic EE groups. Motor (beam-walking) and cognition (acquisition of spatial learning and memory) were assessed on days 7-11 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume and hippocampal cell survival were quantified on day 21. EE, whether provided in combination with VEH or AMT, and AMT (20 mg/kg) + STD, benefitted motor and cognition vs. the STD-housed VEH and AMT (10 mg/kg) groups (p < 0.05). The AMT (20 mg/kg) + EE group performed better than the VEH + EE, AMT (10 mg/kg) + EE, and AMT (20 mg/kg) + STD groups in the acquisition of spatial learning (p < 0.05) but did not differ in motor function (p > 0.05). All groups receiving EE exhibited decreased cortical lesion volumes and increased CA3 neuron survival relative to the STD-housed groups (p < 0.05) but did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). The added cognitive benefit achieved by bridging EE with AMT (20 mg/kg) supports the hypothesis that the temporal separation of combinational therapies is more effective after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent J Vozzella
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Rachel A Bittner
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Tyler S Ranellone
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Kelsey M Grimm
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Kelsey N Palmer
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Anna N Carpio
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Quinn C Abel
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Eleni H Moschonas
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moschonas EH, Ranellone TS, Vozzella VJ, Rennerfeldt PL, Bondi CO, Annas EM, Bittner RA, Tamura DM, Reddy RI, Eleti RR, Cheng JP, Jarvis JM, Fink EL, Kline AE. Efficacy of a music-based intervention in a preclinical model of traumatic brain injury: An initial foray into a novel and non-pharmacological rehabilitative therapy. Exp Neurol 2023; 369:114544. [PMID: 37726048 PMCID: PMC10591861 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes neurobehavioral and cognitive impairments that negatively impact life quality for millions of individuals. Because of its pernicious effects, numerous pharmacological interventions have been evaluated to attenuate the TBI-induced deficits or to reinstate function. While many such pharmacotherapies have conferred benefits in the laboratory, successful translation to the clinic has yet to be achieved. Given the individual, medical, and societal burden of TBI, there is an urgent need for alternative approaches to attenuate TBI sequelae and promote recovery. Music based interventions (MBIs) may hold untapped potential for improving neurobehavioral and cognitive recovery after TBI as data in normal, non-TBI, rats show plasticity and augmented cognition. Hence, the aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that providing a MBI to adult rats after TBI would improve cognition, neurobehavior, and histological endpoints. Adult male rats received a moderate-to-severe controlled cortical impact injury (2.8 mm impact at 4 m/s) or sham surgery (n = 10-12 per group) and 24 h later were randomized to classical Music or No Music (i.e., ambient room noise) for 3 h/day from 19:00 to 22:00 h for 30 days (last day of behavior). Motor (beam-walk), cognitive (acquisition of spatial learning and memory), anxiety-like behavior (open field), coping (shock probe defensive burying), as well as histopathology (lesion volume), neuroplasticity (BDNF), and neuroinflammation (Iba1, and CD163) were assessed. The data showed that the MBI improved motor, cognitive, and anxiety-like behavior vs. No Music (p's < 0.05). Music also reduced cortical lesion volume and activated microglia but increased resting microglia and hippocampal BDNF expression. These findings support the hypothesis and provide a compelling impetus for additional preclinical studies utilizing MBIs as a potential efficacious rehabilitative therapy for TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni H Moschonas
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Tyler S Ranellone
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Vincent J Vozzella
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Piper L Rennerfeldt
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Ellen M Annas
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Rachel A Bittner
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Dana M Tamura
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Rithika I Reddy
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Rithik R Eleti
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Jessica M Jarvis
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Ericka L Fink
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen R, Lin Q, Wu J, Lin Y, Lin T, Wu W, Chen X, Wu S, Zeng G, Lin X, Wu Y, Liu N, Xiao Y, Chen H. Augmentation therapy with tandospirone citrate in vascular depression patients with mild cognitive impairment: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Psychiatr Res 2023; 159:274-282. [PMID: 36774768 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a prominent clinical manifestation of vascular depression (VaDep). The current study aimed to assess the efficacy of tandospirone citrate in VaDep cases with mild cognitive impairment (VaDep-MCI) as well as the role of plasma monoamine neurotransmitters during the treatment. In this single-blind, randomized controlled study, 116 participants were randomly assigned to the tandospirone (tandospirone citrate-escitalopram) and control (escitalopram) groups. The primary endpoints were changes in cognitive test scores from baseline to Week 8, including the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Semantic Verbal Fluency (SVF) test, Trail Making Test (TMT), Digital Span Test (DST) and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) scores. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine repeated measures. The results showed that compared with the changes in the control group from baseline to Week 8, the tandospirone group showed more significant changes in SVF score at Weeks 4 (p < 0.05) and 8 (p < 0.001), and TMT (B-A) score at Week 8 (p < 0.05). RAVLT, DST and DCT scores were relatively stable in both groups during the study period. Moreover, mediation analysis showed that these results were not mediated by the alleviation of depression symptoms. Partial Spearman correlation analysis showed that only plasma 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) was positively correlated with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score after Bonferroni correction (r = 0.347, p < 0.001). Augmentation therapy with tandospirone citrate improved the executive and language functions of VaDep-MCI patients. Additionally, plasma 5-HT levels may serve as a potential biomarker of VaDep severity. These findings may provide clinical insights into the treatment of vascular depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronghua Chen
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qianwen Lin
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Sleep Center, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Juan Wu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, School of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yongsen Lin
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ting Lin
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Weiwei Wu
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xinyan Chen
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shufang Wu
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Guiying Zeng
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaohui Lin
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yongxi Wu
- Department of Sleep Center, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Nan Liu
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Yingchun Xiao
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Hongbin Chen
- Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Craine TJ, Race NS, Kutash LA, Iouchmanov AL, Moschonas EH, O'Neil DA, Sunleaf CR, Patel A, Patel N, Grobengeiser KO, Marshall IP, Magdelinic TN, Cheng JP, Bondi CO. Milnacipran Ameliorates Executive Function Impairments following Frontal Lobe Traumatic Brain Injury in Male Rats: A Multimodal Behavioral Assessment. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:112-124. [PMID: 35979888 PMCID: PMC10024072 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) affect more than 10 million patients annually worldwide, causing long-term cognitive and psychosocial impairments. Frontal lobe TBIs commonly impair executive function, but laboratory models typically focus primarily on spatial learning and declarative memory. We implemented a multi-modal approach for clinically relevant cognitive-behavioral assessments of frontal lobe function in rats with TBI and assessed treatment benefits of the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, milnacipran (MLN). Two attentional set-shifting tasks (AST) evaluated cognitive flexibility via the rats' ability to locate food-based rewards by learning, unlearning, and relearning sequential rule sets with shifting salient cues. Adult male rats reached stable pre-injury operant AST (oAST) performance in 3-4 weeks, then were isoflurane-anesthetized, subjected to a unilateral frontal lobe controlled cortical impact (2.4 mm depth, 4 m/sec velocity) or Sham injury, and randomized to treatment conditions. Milnacipran (30 mg/kg/day) or vehicle (VEH; 10% ethanol in saline) was administered intraperitoneally via implanted osmotic minipumps (continuous infusions post-surgery, 60 μL/h). Rats had a 10-day recovery post-TBI/Sham before performing light/location-based oAST for 10 days and, subsequently, odor/media-based digging AST (dAST) on the last test day (26-27 days post-injury) before sacrifice. Both AST tests revealed significant deficits in TBI+VEH rats, seen as elevated total trials and errors (p < 0.05), which generally normalized in MLN-treated rats (p < 0.05). This first simultaneous dual AST assessment demonstrates oAST and dAST are sufficiently sensitive and robust to detect subtle attentional and cognitive flexibility executive impairments after frontal lobe TBI in rats. Chronic MLN administration shows promise for attenuation of post-TBI executive function deficits, thus meriting further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J. Craine
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas S. Race
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Association of Academic Physiatrists Rehabilitation Medicine Scientist Training Program, Owings Mills, Maryland, USA
| | - Lindsay A. Kutash
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anna L. Iouchmanov
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eleni H. Moschonas
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Darik A. O'Neil
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carlson R. Sunleaf
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aarti Patel
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nima Patel
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine O. Grobengeiser
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ian P. Marshall
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Taylor N. Magdelinic
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey P. Cheng
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Corina O. Bondi
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Neurobiology, and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Children's Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hiskens MI. Targets of neuroprotection and review of pharmacological interventions in traumatic brain injury. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2022; 382:149-166. [DOI: 10.1124/jpet.121.001023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
6
|
Lutsenko RV. ON THE QUESTION OF ADENOSINE SYSTEM PARTICIPATION IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF NEUROSES. BULLETIN OF PROBLEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.29254/2077-4214-2022-4-167-76-83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
7
|
Teng YD, Zafonte RD. Prelude to the special issue on novel neurocircuit, cellular and molecular targets for developing functional rehabilitation therapies of neurotrauma. Exp Neurol 2021; 341:113689. [PMID: 33745921 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The poor endogenous recovery capacity and other impediments to reinstating sensorimotor or autonomic function after adult neurotrauma have perplexed modern neuroscientists, bioengineers, and physicians for over a century. However, despite limited improvement in options to mitigate acute pathophysiological sequalae, the past 20 years have witnessed marked progresses in developing efficacious rehabilitation strategies for chronic spinal cord and brain injuries. The achievement is mainly attributable to research advancements in elucidating neuroplastic mechanisms for the potential to enhance clinical prognosis. Innovative cross-disciplinary studies have established novel therapeutic targets, theoretical frameworks, and regiments to attain treatment efficacy. This Special Issue contained eight papers that described experimental and human data along with literature reviews regarding the essential roles of the conventionally undervalued factors in neural repair: systemic inflammation, neural-respiratory inflammasome axis, modulation of glutamatergic and monoaminergic neurotransmission, neurogenesis, nerve transfer, recovery neurobiology components, and the spinal cord learning, respiration and central pattern generator neurocircuits. The focus of this work was on how to induce functional recovery from manipulating these underpinnings through their interactions with secondary injury events, peripheral and supraspinal inputs, neuromusculoskeletal network, and interventions (i.e., activity training, pharmacological adjuncts, electrical stimulation, and multimodal neuromechanical, brain-computer interface [BCI] and robotic assistance [RA] devices). The evidence suggested that if key neurocircuits are therapeutically reactivated, rebuilt, and/or modulated under proper sensory feedback, neurological function (e.g., cognition, respiration, limb movement, locomotion, etc.) will likely be reanimated after neurotrauma. The efficacy can be optimized by individualizing multimodal rehabilitation treatments via BCI/RA-integrated drug administration and neuromechanical protheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang D Teng
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Neurotrauma Recovery Research, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Mass General Brigham, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Spaulding Research Institute, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Ross D Zafonte
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Neurotrauma Recovery Research, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Mass General Brigham, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Spaulding Research Institute, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Diaz-Chávez A, Lajud N, Roque A, Cheng JP, Meléndez-Herrera E, Valdéz-Alarcón JJ, Bondi CO, Kline AE. Early life stress increases vulnerability to the sequelae of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2020; 329:113318. [PMID: 32305419 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Early life stress (ELS) is a risk factor for many psychopathologies that happen later in life. Although stress can occur in cases of child abuse, studies on non-accidental brain injuries in pediatric populations do not consider the possible increase in vulnerability caused by ELS. Hence, we sought to determine whether ELS increases the effects of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) on cognition, hippocampal inflammation, and plasticity. Male rats were subjected to maternal separation for 180 min per day (MS180) or used as controls (CONT) during the first 21 post-natal (P) days. At P21 the rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and subjected to a mild controlled cortical impact or sham injury. At P32 the rats were injected with the cell proliferation marker bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU, 500 mg/kg), then evaluated for spatial learning and memory in a water maze (P35-40) and sacrificed for quantification of Ki67+, BrdU+ and Iba1+ (P42). Neither MS180 nor mTBI impacted cognitive outcome when provided alone but their combination (MS180 + mTBI) decreased spatial learning and memory relative to Sham controls (p < .01). mTBI increased microglial activation and affected BrdU+ cell survival in the ipsilateral hippocampus without affecting proliferation rates. However, only MS180 + mTBI increased microglial activation in the area adjacent to the injury and the contralateral CA1 hippocampal subfield, and decreased cell proliferation in the ipsilateral neurogenic niche. Overall, the data show that ELS increases the vulnerability to the sequelae of pediatric mTBI and may be mediated by increased neuroinflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arturo Diaz-Chávez
- División de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Michoacán, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico; Instituto de Investigaciones sobre los Recursos Naturales - Benemérita y Centenaria Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Naima Lajud
- División de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Michoacán, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Angélica Roque
- División de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Michoacán, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Esperanza Meléndez-Herrera
- Instituto de Investigaciones sobre los Recursos Naturales - Benemérita y Centenaria Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Juan José Valdéz-Alarcón
- Centro Multidisciplinario de Estudios en Biotecnología, Benemérita y Centenaria Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Executive (dys)function after traumatic brain injury: special considerations for behavioral pharmacology. Behav Pharmacol 2019; 29:617-637. [PMID: 30215621 PMCID: PMC6155367 DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0000000000000430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Executive function is an umbrella term that includes cognitive processes such as decision-making, impulse control, attention, behavioral flexibility, and working memory. Each of these processes depends largely upon monoaminergic (dopaminergic, serotonergic, and noradrenergic) neurotransmission in the frontal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus, among other brain areas. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) induces disruptions in monoaminergic signaling along several steps in the neurotransmission process - synthesis, distribution, and breakdown - and in turn, produces long-lasting deficits in several executive function domains. Understanding how TBI alters monoamingeric neurotransmission and executive function will advance basic knowledge of the underlying principles that govern executive function and potentially further treatment of cognitive deficits following such injury. In this review, we examine the influence of TBI on the following measures of executive function - impulsivity, behavioral flexibility, and working memory. We also describe monoaminergic-systems changes following TBI. Given that TBI patients experience alterations in monoaminergic signaling following injury, they may represent a unique population with regard to pharmacotherapy. We conclude this review by discussing some considerations for pharmacotherapy in the field of TBI.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kosari-Nasab M, Shokouhi G, Azarfarin M, Bannazadeh Amirkhiz M, Mesgari Abbasi M, Salari AA. Serotonin 5-HT1A receptors modulate depression-related symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury in male adult mice. Metab Brain Dis 2019; 34:575-582. [PMID: 30607822 DOI: 10.1007/s11011-018-0366-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury is a complex phenomenon leading to neurological diseases and persistent disability that currently affects millions of people worldwide. Increasing evidence shows that a wide range of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) suffer from depression during the initial stages of injury and the post-acute stages of recovery. However, the underlying mechanisms involved in depression following mTBI are still not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A) receptor is involved in the regulation of depression-related behaviors following mild traumatic brain injury in mice. Mice with or without mTBI received intracerebroventricular injections of 5-HT1A receptor agonist (8-OH-DPAT) or antagonist (WAY-100635) for 5 days, then animals were subjected to behavioral tests. Four behavioral tests including novelty-suppressed feeding test, forced swim test, sucrose preference test and tail suspension test were used to evaluate depression-related symptoms in animals. Our results indicated that mTBI induction increased depression-like symptoms through altering serotonin 5-HT1A receptor activity in the brain. Activation of 5-HT1A receptor by a subthreshold dose of 8-OH-DPAT led to a significant decrease in depression-like behaviors, whereas blockade of 5-HT1A receptor by a subthreshold dose of WAY-100635 resulted in a considerable increase in depression-like phenotypes in mTBI-induced mice. The major strength of the present study is that depression-related symptoms were assessed in four behavioral tests. The present study supports the idea that disturbances in the function of serotonergic system in the brain following mTBI can play an important role in the regulation of depression-related behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morteza Kosari-Nasab
- Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 51656-65811, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ghaffar Shokouhi
- Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 51656-65811, Tabriz, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- Neuroscience Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | | | | | - Mehran Mesgari Abbasi
- Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 51656-65811, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ali-Akbar Salari
- Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 51656-65811, Tabriz, Iran.
- Salari Institute of Cognitive and Behavioral Disorders (SICBD), Alborz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bleimeister IH, Wolff M, Lam TR, Brooks DM, Patel R, Cheng JP, Bondi CO, Kline AE. Environmental enrichment and amantadine confer individual but nonadditive enhancements in motor and spatial learning after controlled cortical impact injury. Brain Res 2019; 1714:227-233. [PMID: 30876859 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) and amantadine (AMT) enhance motor and cognitive outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there are no data on the effects of combining these two therapies. Hence, the aim of the current study was to combine EE and AMT after TBI to determine if their net effect further enhances motor and cognitive performance. Anesthetized adult male rats received either a cortical impact of moderate severity or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing and once daily administration of AMT (20 mg/kg; i.p.) or saline vehicle (VEH, 1 mL/kg; i.p.) beginning 24 h after injury for 19 days. Motor and cognitive function were assessed on post-surgical days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. There were no statistical differences among the sham groups regardless of therapy, so the data were pooled. EE, AMT, and their combination (EE + AMT) improved beam-balance, but only EE and EE + AMT enhanced beam-walking. All three treatment paradigms improved spatial learning and memory relative to the VEH-treated STD controls (p < 0.05). No differences were revealed between the EE groups, regardless of treatment, but both were better than the AMT-treated STD group on beam-walking and spatial learning (p < 0.05). Both EE groups equally reduced cortical lesion volume relative to the STD-housed AMT and VEH groups (p < 0.05). The results indicate that although beneficial on their own, EE + AMT do not provide additional benefits after TBI. It is important to note that the lack of additive effects using the current treatment and behavioral protocols does not detract from the benefits of each individual therapy. The findings provide insight for future combination studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel H Bleimeister
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Mia Wolff
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Tracey R Lam
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Derrick M Brooks
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Reece Patel
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bondi CO, Yelleswarapu NK, Day-Cooney J, Memarzadeh K, Folweiler KA, Bou-Abboud CE, Leary JB, Cheng JP, Tehranian-DePasquale R, Kline AE. Systemic administration of donepezil attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment on neurobehavioral outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2018; 36:45-57. [PMID: 29439368 DOI: 10.3233/rnn-170781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) donepezil (DON) is recommended as a potential treatment for cognition after clinical traumatic brain injury (TBI) and therefore may be prescribed as an adjunct therapy during rehabilitation. However, a dose-response study evaluating DON after a controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury in rats did not reveal cognitive benefits. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the effect of DON on behavioral and histological outcome when combined with environmental enrichment (EE), a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation. It was hypothesized that the combined treatments would produce a synergistic effect yielding improved recovery over neurorehabilitation alone. METHODS Isoflurane-anesthetized adult male rats received a CCI or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing plus systemic injections of DON (0.25 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH; 1.0 mL/kg saline) once daily for 19 days beginning 24 hr after injury. Function was assessed by established motor and cognitive tests on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 19. RESULTS DON was ineffective when administered alone. In contrast, EE conferred significant motor and cognitive benefits, and reduced cortical lesion volume vs. STD (p < 0.05). Combining the therapies weakened the efficacy of rehabilitation as revealed by diminished motor and cognitive recovery in the TBI+EE+DON group vs. the TBI+EE+VEH group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION These data replicate previous findings showing that EE is beneficial and DON is ineffective after CCI and add to the literature a novel and unpredicted finding that supports neither the hypothesis nor the use of DON for TBI. Investigation of other AChEIs after CCI injury is necessary to gain further insight into the value of this therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Narayana K Yelleswarapu
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Julian Day-Cooney
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kimiya Memarzadeh
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kaitlin A Folweiler
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carine E Bou-Abboud
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jacob B Leary
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Roya Tehranian-DePasquale
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dose related effects of buspirone on pain, learning / memory and food intake. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2018; 99:182-190. [PMID: 30244043 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The present study concerned extending the therapeutic use of buspirone for treating pain and improving cognition. Effects of single and repeated administration of buspirone were therefore monitored on pain threshold in the hot plate test and on spatial memory in the water maze test in rats. Effects on cumulative food intake were also monitored. The drug was administered intraperitoneally in doses of 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg. We found that single and repeated administration of buspirone in doses of 0.1 mg/kg decreased pain threshold in the hot plate test, while doses of 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg increased it. Effects of single and repeated administration were not different. A dose of 0.3 mg/kg had no effect. Food intake increased following single as well as repeated administration of 0.1 mg/kg buspirone; higher doses had no effect. Low doses (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) improved acquisition and retention of memory in the water maze test, while memory extinction was reduced. Higher doses had either no effect (1.0 mg/kg) or impaired (2.0 mg/kg) performance in this test. The results suggest potential therapeutic use of selected doses of buspirone as an analgesic and nootropic drug.
Collapse
|
14
|
Environmental enrichment, alone or in combination with various pharmacotherapies, confers marked benefits after traumatic brain injury. Neuropharmacology 2018; 145:13-24. [PMID: 29499273 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant health care issue that affects over ten million people worldwide. Treatment options are limited with numerous failures resulting from single therapies. Fortunately, several preclinical studies have shown that combination treatment strategies may afford greater improvement and perhaps can lead to successful clinical translation, particularly if one of the therapies is neurorehabilitation. The aim of this review is to highlight TBI studies that combined environmental enrichment (EE), a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation, with pharmacotherapies. A series of PubMed search strategies yielded only nine papers that fit the criteria. The consensus is that EE provides robust neurobehavioral, cognitive, and histological improvement after experimental TBI and that the combination of EE with some pharmacotherapies can lead to benefits beyond those revealed by single therapies. However, it is noted that EE can be challenged by drugs such as the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil, and the antipsychotic drug, haloperidol, which attenuate its efficacy. These findings may help shape clinical neurorehabilitation strategies to more effectively improve patient outcome. Potential mechanisms for the EE and pharmacotherapy-induced effects are also discussed. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled "Neurobiology of Environmental Enrichment".
Collapse
|
15
|
Cheng JP, Leary JB, O'Neil DA, Meyer EA, Free KE, Bondi CO, Kline AE. Spontaneous recovery of traumatic brain injury-induced functional deficits is not hindered by daily administration of lorazepam. Behav Brain Res 2017; 339:215-221. [PMID: 29203336 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Agitation and aggression are common sequelae of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and pose a challenge to physicians and other health providers during acute patient care and subsequent neurorehabilitation. Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are routinely administered to manage TBI patients displaying such maladaptive behaviors despite several clinical and preclinical studies demonstrating that they hinder recovery. A potentially viable alternative to APDs may be the benzodiazepines, which have differing mechanisms of action. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that lorazepam (LOR) would not impede recovery after TBI. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were intraperitoneally administered LOR (0.1mg/kg, 1.0mg/kg, or 2.0mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH; 1mL/kg) commencing 24-h after surgery and once daily for 19days. Motor and cognitive outcomes were assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. No differences were revealed among the four sham control groups and thus they were pooled into one inclusive SHAM group. The SHAMs performed better than all TBI groups on all assessments (p<0.05). Regarding TBI, the 2.0mg/kg LOR group performed better than the VEH and 0.1mg/kg or 1.0mg/kg LOR groups on every task (p<0.05); no differences were observed among the latter three groups on any endpoint (p>0.05). Overall, these preclinical behavioral data support the hypothesis and reveal a therapeutic benefit with the higher dose of LOR. The findings suggest that LOR may be an alternative, to APDs, for controlling agitation without compromising spontaneous recovery and perhaps could afford a dual benefit by also promoting therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States
| | - Jacob B Leary
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States
| | - Darik A O'Neil
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States
| | - Elizabeth A Meyer
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States
| | - Kristin E Free
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Free KE, Greene AM, Bondi CO, Lajud N, de la Tremblaye PB, Kline AE. Comparable impediment of cognitive function in female and male rats subsequent to daily administration of haloperidol after traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2017; 296:62-68. [PMID: 28698031 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Antipsychotic drugs, such as haloperidol (HAL), are prescribed in the clinic to manage traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced agitation. While preclinical studies have consistently shown that once-daily administration of HAL hinders functional recovery after TBI in male rats, its effects in females are unknown. Hence, the objective of this study was to directly compare neurobehavioral and histological outcomes in both sexes to determine whether the reported deleterious effects of HAL extend to females. Anesthetized adult female and male rats received either a controlled cortical impact (CCI) or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to a dosing regimen of HAL (0.5mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (VEH; 1mL/kg, i.p.) that was initiated 24h after injury and continued once daily for 19 consecutive days. Motor function was tested using established beam-balance/walk protocols on post-operative days 1-5 and acquisition of spatial learning was assessed with a well-validated Morris water maze task on days 14-19. Cortical lesion volume was quantified at 21days. No statistical differences were revealed between the HAL and VEH-treated sham groups and thus they were pooled for each sex. HAL only impaired motor recovery in males (p<0.05), but significantly diminished spatial learning in both sexes (p<0.05). Females, regardless of treatment, exhibited smaller cortical lesions vs VEH-treated males (p<0.05). Taken together, the data show that daily HAL does not prohibit motor recovery in females, but does negatively impact cognition. These task-dependent differential effects of HAL in female vs male rats may have clinical significance as they can direct therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin E Free
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Anna M Greene
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Naima Lajud
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; División de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Michoacán, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Morelia, Mexico
| | - Patricia B de la Tremblaye
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Radabaugh HL, LaPorte MJ, Greene AM, Bondi CO, Lajud N, Kline AE. Refining environmental enrichment to advance rehabilitation based research after experimental traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2017; 294:12-18. [PMID: 28457905 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Revised: 04/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The typical environmental enrichment (EE) paradigm, which consists of continuous exposure after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI), promotes behavioral and histological benefits. However, rehabilitation is often abbreviated in the clinic and administered in multiple daily sessions. While recent studies have demonstrated that a once daily 6-hr bout of EE confers benefits comparable to continuous EE, breaking the therapy into two shorter sessions may increase novelty and ultimately enhance recovery. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that functional and histological outcomes will be significantly improved by daily preclinical neurorehabilitation consisting of two 3-hr periods of EE vs. a single 6-hr session. Anesthetized adult male rats received a controlled cortical impact of moderate-to-severe injury (2.8mm tissue deformation at 4m/s) or sham surgery and were then randomly assigned to groups receiving standard (STD) housing, a single 6-hr session of EE, or two 3-hr sessions of EE daily for 3weeks. Motor function (beam-balance/traversal) and acquisition of spatial learning/memory retention (Morris water maze) were assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. Both EE conditions improved motor function and acquisition of spatial learning, and reduced cortical lesion volume relative to STD housing (p<0.05), but did not differ from one another in any endpoint (p>0.05). The findings replicate previous work showing that 6-hr of EE daily is sufficient to confer behavioral and histological benefits after TBI and extend the findings by demonstrating that the benefits are comparable regardless of how the 6-hrs of EE are accrued. The relevance of the finding is that it can be extrapolated to the clinic and may benefit patients who cannot endure a single extended period of neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Radabaugh
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Megan J LaPorte
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Anna M Greene
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Naima Lajud
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; División de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Michoacán - Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Morelia, Mexico
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
GSNO promotes functional recovery in experimental TBI by stabilizing HIF-1α. Behav Brain Res 2016; 340:63-70. [PMID: 27780722 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Revised: 10/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes sustained disability due to compromised neurorepair mechanisms. Crucial to neurorepair and functional recovery following both TBI and stroke is hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α). Based on reports that HIF-1α could be stabilized via S-nitrosylation, we tested the hypothesis that the S-nitrosylating agent S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) would stabilize HIF-1α, thereby stimulating neurorepair mechanisms and aiding in functional recovery. TBI was induced by controlled cortical impact (CCI) in adult rats. GSNO (0.05mg/kg) was administered at two hours after CCI. The treatment was repeated daily until the 14th day after CCI. Functional recovery was assessed by motor and cognitive functions, and the recovery was compared with the expression of HIF-1α. The mechanisms of GSNO-mediated S-nitrosylation of HIF-1α were determined using brain endothelial cells. While non-treated TBI animals showed sustained neurobehavioral deficits, GSNO treatment of TBI improved neurobehavioral functions. GSNO also increased the expression of HIF-1α and VEGF. The beneficial effects of GSNO on neurobehavioral functions in TBI animals were blocked by treatment with the HIF-1α inhibitor 2-methoxyestradiol (2-ME). The stimulatory effect of GSNO on VEGF was reversed not only by 2-ME but also by the denitrosylating agent dithiothreitol, confirming our hypothesis that GSNO's benefits are mediated by the stabilization of HIF-1α via S-nitrosylation. GSNO's S-nitrosylation of HIF-1α was further confirmed using a biotin switch assay in endothelial cells. The data provide evidence that GSNO treatment of TBI aids functional recovery through stabilizing HIF-1α via S-nitrosylation. GSNO is a natural component of the human brain/body, and its exogenous administration has not shown adverse effects in humans. Therefore, the translational potential of GSNO therapy in TBI is high.
Collapse
|
19
|
Radabaugh HL, Carlson LJ, O'Neil DA, LaPorte MJ, Monaco CM, Cheng JP, de la Tremblaye PB, Lajud N, Bondi CO, Kline AE. Abbreviated environmental enrichment confers neurobehavioral, cognitive, and histological benefits in brain-injured female rats. Exp Neurol 2016; 286:61-68. [PMID: 27693618 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Revised: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) promotes behavioral recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the chronic rehabilitation provided in the laboratory is not analogous to the clinic where physiotherapy is typically limited. Moreover, females make up approximately 40% of the clinical TBI population, yet they are seldom studied in brain trauma. Hence, the goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that abbreviated EE would confer neurobehavioral, cognitive, and histological benefits in brain injured female rats. Anesthetized rats received a cortical impact of moderate-to-severe injury (2.8mm tissue deformation at 4m/s) or sham surgery and then were randomly assigned to groups receiving standard (STD) housing or 4h, 6h, or 24h of EE daily. Motor function (beam-balance/walk and rotarod) was assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and every other day from 1 to 19, respectively. Spatial learning/memory (Morris water maze) was evaluated on days 14-19, and cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. No statistical differences were appreciated among the sham controls in any assessment and thus the data were pooled. All EE conditions improved motor function and memory retention, but only 6h and 24h enhanced spatial learning relative to STD (p<0.05). Moreover, EE, regardless of duration reduced cortical lesion volume (p<0.05). These data confirm that abbreviated EE confers robust neurobehavioral, cognitive, and histological benefits in TBI female rats, which supports the hypothesis and strengthens the utility of EE as a pre-clinical model of neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Radabaugh
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Lauren J Carlson
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Darik A O'Neil
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Megan J LaPorte
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Christina M Monaco
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Patricia B de la Tremblaye
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Naima Lajud
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; División de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Michoacán - Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Morelia, Mexico
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Phelps TI, Bondi CO, Mattiola VV, Kline AE. Relative to Typical Antipsychotic Drugs, Aripiprazole Is a Safer Alternative for Alleviating Behavioral Disturbances After Experimental Brain Trauma. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 31:25-33. [PMID: 27225976 DOI: 10.1177/1545968316650281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are used to manage traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced behavioral disturbances, such as agitation and aggression. However, APDs exhibiting D2 receptor antagonism impede cognitive recovery after experimental TBI. Hence, empirical evaluation of APDs with different mechanistic actions is warranted. Aripiprazole (ARIP) is a D2 and 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) receptor agonist; pharmacotherapies with these properties enhance cognition after TBI. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that ARIP would increase behavioral performance and decrease histopathology after TBI. METHODS Adult male rats were subjected to either a controlled cortical impact (CCI) or sham injury and then randomly assigned to ARIP (0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg) or VEH (1.0 mL/kg, saline vehicle) groups. Treatments began 24 hours after surgery and were administered once daily for 19 days. Motor (beam-balance/beam-walk) and cognitive (Morris water maze) performance was assessed on postoperative days 1 to 5 and 14 to 19, respectively, followed by quantification of hippocampal CA1,3 neuron survival and cortical lesion volume. RESULTS Beam-balance was significantly improved in the CCI + ARIP (1.0 mg/kg) group versus CCI + ARIP (0.1 mg/kg) and CCI + VEH (P < .05). Spatial learning and memory retention were significantly improved in the CCI + ARIP (0.1 mg/kg) group versus the CCI + ARIP (1.0 mg/kg) and CCI + VEH groups (P < .05). Both doses of ARIP reduced lesion size and CA3 cell loss versus VEH (P < .05). Importantly, neither dose of ARIP impeded functional recovery as previously reported with other APDs. CONCLUSION These findings support the hypothesis and endorse ARIP as a safer APD for alleviating behavioral disturbances after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas I Phelps
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Case Western/MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland OH, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leary JB, Bondi CO, LaPorte MJ, Carlson LJ, Radabaugh HL, Cheng JP, Kline AE. The Therapeutic Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment and Methylphenidate Alone and in Combination after Controlled Cortical Impact Injury. J Neurotrauma 2016; 34:444-450. [PMID: 26972895 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) and methylphenidate (MPH) independently confer significant benefit to behavioral recovery after controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury. Given that combinational therapies may be more clinically translatable than monotherapies, the aim of the current study was to test the hypothesis that a combined treatment regimen of EE and MPH would provide greater therapeutic efficacy than either one alone. Anesthetized adult male rats received either a CCI of moderate severity or sham injury and were then randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing where they received either intraperitoneal (ip) MPH (5 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH; 1.0 mL/kg; ip) beginning 24 h after injury and once daily for 19 days. Motor and cognitive assessments were conducted on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. No differences were observed in sham controls regardless of treatments, and thus their data were pooled. The traumatic brain injury (TBI)+EE+VEH and TBI+EE+MPH groups exhibited enhanced beam balance and beam walk performance relative to the TBI+STD+VEH group (p < 0.05), but did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). No effect of MPH treatment alone was observed in either motor task. In contrast, MPH improved spatial learning and memory when presented alone and also when combined with EE relative to VEH-treated STD controls (p < 0.05). In addition, both EE groups performed significantly better than the TBI+STD+MPH group (p < 0.05), but did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). These data replicate previous findings that both EE and MPH confer cognitive benefits after TBI and extend the findings by revealing that combining EE and MPH does not produce effects greater than either treatment alone, which does not support the hypothesis. The lack of an additive effect may be because of the robustness of the EE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob B Leary
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,2 Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Corina O Bondi
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,2 Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,3 Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Megan J LaPorte
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,2 Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Lauren J Carlson
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,2 Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Hannah L Radabaugh
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,2 Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey P Cheng
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,2 Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anthony E Kline
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,2 Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,4 Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,5 Psychology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,6 Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,7 Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kline AE, Leary JB, Radabaugh HL, Cheng JP, Bondi CO. Combination therapies for neurobehavioral and cognitive recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury: Is more better? Prog Neurobiol 2016; 142:45-67. [PMID: 27166858 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2016] [Revised: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 05/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant health care crisis that affects two million individuals in the United Sates alone and over ten million worldwide each year. While numerous monotherapies have been evaluated and shown to be beneficial at the bench, similar results have not translated to the clinic. One reason for the lack of successful translation may be due to the fact that TBI is a heterogeneous disease that affects multiple mechanisms, thus requiring a therapeutic approach that can act on complementary, rather than single, targets. Hence, the use of combination therapies (i.e., polytherapy) has emerged as a viable approach. Stringent criteria, such as verification of each individual treatment plus the combination, a focus on behavioral outcome, and post-injury vs. pre-injury treatments, were employed to determine which studies were appropriate for review. The selection process resulted in 37 papers that fit the specifications. The review, which is the first to comprehensively assess the effects of combination therapies on behavioral outcomes after TBI, encompasses five broad categories (inflammation, oxidative stress, neurotransmitter dysregulation, neurotrophins, and stem cells, with and without rehabilitative therapies). Overall, the findings suggest that combination therapies can be more beneficial than monotherapies as indicated by 46% of the studies exhibiting an additive or synergistic positive effect versus on 19% reporting a negative interaction. These encouraging findings serve as an impetus for continued combination studies after TBI and ultimately for the development of successful clinically relevant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
| | - Jacob B Leary
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Hannah L Radabaugh
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Glikmann-Johnston Y, Saling MM, Reutens DC, Stout JC. Hippocampal 5-HT1A Receptor and Spatial Learning and Memory. Front Pharmacol 2015; 6:289. [PMID: 26696889 PMCID: PMC4674558 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Spatial cognition is fundamental for survival in the topographically complex environments inhabited by humans and other animals. The hippocampus, which has a central role in spatial cognition, is characterized by high concentration of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptor binding sites, particularly of the 1A receptor (5-HT1A) subtype. This review highlights converging evidence for the role of hippocampal 5-HT1A receptors in spatial learning and memory. We consider studies showing that activation or blockade of the 5-HT1A receptors using agonists or antagonists, respectively, lead to changes in spatial learning and memory. For example, pharmacological manipulation to induce 5-HT release, or to block 5-HT uptake, have indicated that increased extracellular 5-HT concentrations maintain or improve memory performance. In contrast, reduced levels of 5-HT have been shown to impair spatial memory. Furthermore, the lack of 5-HT1A receptor subtype in single gene knockout mice is specifically associated with spatial memory impairments. These findings, along with evidence from recent cognitive imaging studies using positron emission tomography (PET) with 5-HT1A receptor ligands, and studies of individual genetic variance in 5-HT1A receptor availability, strongly suggests that 5-HT, mediated by the 5-HT1A receptor subtype, plays a key role in spatial learning and memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifat Glikmann-Johnston
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash UniversityMelbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neuropsychology, Austin HealthMelbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael M. Saling
- Department of Neuropsychology, Austin HealthMelbourne, VIC, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David C. Reutens
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Julie C. Stout
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash UniversityMelbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) receptor agonists: A decade of empirical evidence supports their use as an efficacious therapeutic strategy for brain trauma. Brain Res 2015; 1640:5-14. [PMID: 26612522 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Revised: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant and enduring health care issue with limited treatment options. While several pre-clinical therapeutic approaches have led to enhanced motor and/or cognitive performance, the benefits of these treatments have not translated to the clinic. One plausible explanation is that the therapies may not have been rigorously evaluated, thus rendering the bench-to-bedside leap premature and subsequently unsuccessful. An approach that has undergone considerable empirical research after TBI is pharmacological targeting of 5-HT1A receptors with agonists such as repinotan HCl, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), and buspirone. The goal of this review is to integrate and interpret the findings from a series of studies that evaluated the efficacy of 5-HT1A receptor agonists on functional, histological, and molecular outcome after acquired brain injury. The overwhelming consensus of this exhaustive review is that a decade of empirical evidence supports their use as an efficacious therapeutic strategy for brain trauma. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI:Brain injury and recovery.
Collapse
|
25
|
Bondi CO, Semple BD, Noble-Haeusslein LJ, Osier ND, Carlson SW, Dixon CE, Giza CC, Kline AE. Found in translation: Understanding the biology and behavior of experimental traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015; 58:123-46. [PMID: 25496906 PMCID: PMC4465064 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2014] [Revised: 10/26/2014] [Accepted: 12/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this review is to discuss in greater detail the topics covered in the recent symposium entitled "Traumatic brain injury: laboratory and clinical perspectives," presented at the 2014 International Behavioral Neuroscience Society annual meeting. Herein, we review contemporary laboratory models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) including common assays for sensorimotor and cognitive behavior. New modalities to evaluate social behavior after injury to the developing brain, as well as the attentional set-shifting test (AST) as a measure of executive function in TBI, will be highlighted. Environmental enrichment (EE) will be discussed as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation, and finally, an evidence-based approach to sports-related concussion will be considered. The review consists predominantly of published data, but some discussion of ongoing or future directions is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Bridgette D Semple
- Neurological Surgery and the Graduate Program in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Linda J Noble-Haeusslein
- Neurological Surgery and the Graduate Program in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nicole D Osier
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Shaun W Carlson
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - C Edward Dixon
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Christopher C Giza
- Pediatric Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; UCLA Brain Injury Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Phelps TI, Bondi CO, Ahmed RH, Olugbade YT, Kline AE. Divergent long-term consequences of chronic treatment with haloperidol, risperidone, and bromocriptine on traumatic brain injury-induced cognitive deficits. J Neurotrauma 2015; 32:590-7. [PMID: 25275833 PMCID: PMC4394178 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are provided in the clinic to manage traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced agitation and aggression. Experimental TBI studies consistently show that daily administration of the APDs, haloperidol (HAL) and risperidone (RISP), hinder recovery. However, it is unknown how long the adverse effects remain after cessation of treatment. To elucidate this clinically relevant issue, anesthetized male rats were randomly assigned to four TBI (controlled cortical impact) and four sham groups administered HAL (0.5 mg/kg), RISP (0.45 mg/kg), bromocriptine (BRO; 5.0 mg/kg, included as a control for D2 receptor action), or vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg) 24 h after surgery and once-daily for 19 days. Motor and cognitive recovery was assessed on days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively, and again at 1 and 3 months after drug withdrawal. No overall group differences were observed for motor function among the TBI groups, although the HAL group showed a greater beam-walk deficit on day 5 versus the VEH and BRO groups. Cognitive recovery was significantly impaired in the HAL and RISP groups during the treatment phase versus VEH and BRO. Further, BRO was superior to VEH (p=0.0042). At 1 month, both groups that received APDs continued to exhibit significant cognitive impairment versus VEH and BRO; at 3 months, only the HAL group was impaired. Moreover, the HAL, RISP, and VEH groups continued to be cognitively deficient versus BRO, which also reduced cortical damage. These data replicate previous reports that HAL and RISP impede cognitive recovery after TBI and expand the literature by revealing that the deleterious effects persist for 3 months after drug discontinuation. BRO conferred cognitive benefits when administered concomitantly with behavioral testing, thus replicating previous findings, and also after cessation demonstrating enduring efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas I. Phelps
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Corina O. Bondi
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rashid H. Ahmed
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yewande T. Olugbade
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anthony E. Kline
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Monaco CM, Gebhardt KM, Chlebowski SM, Shaw KE, Cheng JP, Henchir JJ, Zupa MF, Kline AE. A combined therapeutic regimen of buspirone and environmental enrichment is more efficacious than either alone in enhancing spatial learning in brain-injured pediatric rats. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31:1934-41. [PMID: 25050595 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Buspirone, a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, and environmental enrichment (EE) enhance cognition and reduce histopathology after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adult rats, but have not been fully evaluated after pediatric TBI, which is the leading cause of death in children. Hence, the aims of this study were to assess the efficacy of buspirone alone (Experiment 1) and in combination with EE (Experiment 2) in TBI postnatal day-17 male rats. The hypothesis was that both therapies would confer cognitive and histological benefits when provided singly, but their combination would be more efficacious. Anesthetized rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to receive intraperitoneal injections of buspirone (0.08 mg/kg, 0.1 mg/kg, and 0.3 mg/kg) or saline vehicle (1.0 mL/kg) 24 h after surgery and once daily for 16 days (Experiment 1). Spatial learning and memory were assessed using the Morris water maze (MWM) on post-operative days 11-16, and cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 17. Sham controls for each condition were significantly better than all TBI groups. In the TBI groups, buspirone (0.1 mg/kg) enhanced MWM performance versus vehicle and buspirone (0.08 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg) (p<0.05) and reduced lesion volume relative to vehicle (p=0.038). In Experiment 2, buspirone (0.1 mg/kg) or vehicle was combined with EE after TBI, and the data were compared to the standard (STD)-housed groups from Experiment 1. EE lead to a significant enhancement of spatial learning and a reduction in lesion size versus STD. Moreover, the combined treatment group (buspirone+EE) performed markedly better than the buspirone+STD and vehicle+EE groups, which suggests an additive effect and supports the hypothesis. The data replicate previous studies assessing these therapies in adult rats. These novel findings may have important rehabilitation-relevant implications for clinical pediatric TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Monaco
- 1 Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bondi CO, Klitsch KC, Leary JB, Kline AE. Environmental enrichment as a viable neurorehabilitation strategy for experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31:873-88. [PMID: 24555571 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) emerged as a robust independent variable capable of influencing behavioral outcome in experimental studies after the fortuitous observation by renowned neuropsychologist Donald O. Hebb that rats raised as pets in his home performed markedly better on problem-solving tasks than those kept in the laboratory. In the subsequent years, numerous studies ensued demonstrating that EE was also capable of inducing neuroplasticity in normal (i.e., noninjured) rats. These behavioral and neural alterations provided the impetus for investigating EE as a potential therapy for traumatic brain injury (TBI), which, over the past two decades, has resulted in several reports. Hence, the aim of this review is to integrate the findings and present the current state of EE as a viable neurorehabilitation strategy for TBI. Using the specific key term searches "traumatic brain injury" and "environmental enrichment" or "enriched environment," 30 and 30 experimental TBI articles were identified by PubMed and Scopus, respectively. Of these, 27 articles were common to both search engines. An additional article was found on PubMed using the key terms "enriched environment" and "fluid percussion." A review of the bibliographies in the 34 articles did not yield additional citations. The overwhelming consensus of the 34 publications is that EE benefits behavioral and histological outcome after brain injury produced by various models. Further, the enhancements are observed in male and female as well as adult and pediatric rats and mice. Taken together, these cumulative findings provide strong support for EE as a generalized and robust preclinical model of neurorehabilitation. However, to further enhance the model and to more accurately mimic the clinic, future studies should continue to evaluate EE during more rehabilitation-relevant conditions, such as delayed and shorter time periods, as well as in combination with other therapeutic approaches, as we have been doing for the past few years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina O Bondi
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bondi CO, Cheng JP, Tennant HM, Monaco CM, Kline AE. Old dog, new tricks: the attentional set-shifting test as a novel cognitive behavioral task after controlled cortical impact injury. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31:926-37. [PMID: 24397572 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive impairment associated with prefrontal cortical dysfunction is a major component of disability in traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. Specifically, deficits of cognitive flexibility and attentional set-shifting are present across all levels of injury severity. Though alterations in spatial learning have been extensively described in experimental models of TBI, studies investigating more complex cognitive deficits are relatively scarce. Hence, the aim of this preclinical study was to expand on this important issue by evaluating the effect of three injury levels on executive function and behavioral flexibility performance as assessed using an attentional set-shifting test (AST). Isoflurane-anesthetized male rats received a controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury (2.6, 2.8, and 3.0 mm cortical depth at 4 m/sec) or sham injury, whereas an additional group had no surgical manipulation (naïve). Four weeks postsurgery, rats were tested on the AST, which involved a series of discriminative tasks of increasing difficulty, such as simple and compound discriminations, stimulus reversals, and intra- and extradimensional (ED) shifts. TBI produced accompanying impact depth-dependent increases in cortical lesion volumes, with the 3.0-mm cortical depth group displaying significantly larger injury volumes than the 2.6-mm group (p=0.05). Further, injury severity-induced deficits in ED set-shifting and stimulus reversals, as well as increases in total response error rates and total set loss errors, were observed. These novel findings demonstrate executive function and behavioral flexibility deficits in our animal model of CCI injury and provide the impetus to integrate the AST in the standard neurotrauma behavioral battery to further evaluate cognitive dysfunction after TBI. Ongoing experiments in our laboratory are assessing AST performance after pharmacological and rehabilitative therapies post-TBI, as well as elucidating possible mechanisms underlying the observed neuropsychological deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina O Bondi
- 1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Only repeated administration of the serotonergic agonist 8-OH-DPAT improves place learning of rats subjected to fimbria-fornix transection. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2013; 109:50-8. [PMID: 23680575 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2012] [Revised: 04/27/2013] [Accepted: 05/04/2013] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Serotonergic agonists may act neuroprotectively against brain injury. This study addressed the therapeutic potential of 8-hydroxy-2-di-n-propylamino-tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a selective 5-HT1A/7 receptor agonist, after mechanical brain injury, and evaluated its effects in terms of acquisition of an allocentric place learning task in a water maze. Rats were divided into 6 experimental groups, three of which were subjected to bilateral transection of fimbria-fornix (FF), while three groups were given control surgery (Sham). After surgery, within both the lesioned, and sham-operated animals, respectively, one group was administered a single dose of saline, one group was given a single dose (0.5 mg/kg/b.w.) of 8-OH-DPAT, and one group was treated with daily administration of 8-OH-DPAT (0.5 mg/kg/b.w.) for eight days. The acquisition of the water maze based place learning task started on the 8th day post-surgery and continued for 20 days. The results show that the lesioned group subjected to repeated administration of 8-OH-DPAT demonstrated a significantly improved acquisition of the place learning task compared to the vehicle injected lesion group. In contrast, the lesioned group treated with a single administration displayed impaired performance compared to the baseline lesion group. There were no significant effects of the 8-OH-DPAT administration in the sham control groups. We conclude that only the repeated stimulation of the 5-HT1A/7 system was associated with beneficial, recovery enhancing effects.
Collapse
|
31
|
Shaw KE, Bondi CO, Light SH, Massimino LA, McAloon RL, Monaco CM, Kline AE. Donepezil is ineffective in promoting motor and cognitive benefits after controlled cortical impact injury in male rats. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30:557-64. [PMID: 23227953 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor donepezil is used as a therapy for Alzheimer's disease and has been recommended as a treatment for enhancing attention and memory after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although select clinical case studies support the use of donepezil for enhancing cognition, there is a paucity of experimental TBI studies assessing the potential efficacy of this pharmacotherapy. Hence, the aim of this pre-clinical study was to evaluate several doses of donepezil to determine its effect on functional outcome after TBI. Ninety anesthetized adult male rats received a controlled cortical impact (CCI; 2.8 mm cortical depth at 4 m/sec) or sham injury, and then were randomly assigned to six TBI and six sham groups (donepezil 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg/kg, and saline vehicle 1.0 mL/kg). Treatments began 24 h after surgery and were administered i.p. once daily for 19 days. Function was assessed by motor (beam balance/walk) and cognitive (Morris water maze) tests on days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. No significant differences were observed among the sham control groups in any evaluation, regardless of dose, and therefore the data were pooled. Furthermore, no significant differences were revealed among the TBI groups in acute neurological assessments (e.g., righting reflex), suggesting that all groups received the same level of injury severity. None of the five doses of donepezil improved motor or cognitive function relative to vehicle-treated controls. Moreover, the two highest doses significantly impaired beam-balance (3.0 mg/kg), beam-walk (2.0 mg/kg and 3.0 mg/kg), and cognitive performance (3.0 mg/kg) versus vehicle. These data indicate that chronic administration of donepezil is not only ineffective in promoting functional improvement after moderate CCI injury, but depending on the dose is actually detrimental to the recovery process. Further work is necessary to determine if other AChE inhibitors exert similar effects after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn E Shaw
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Monaco CM, Mattiola VV, Folweiler KA, Tay JK, Yelleswarapu NK, Curatolo LM, Matter AM, Cheng JP, Kline AE. Environmental enrichment promotes robust functional and histological benefits in female rats after controlled cortical impact injury. Exp Neurol 2013; 247:410-8. [PMID: 23333563 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2012] [Revised: 01/02/2013] [Accepted: 01/09/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) consistently induces marked benefits in male rats after traumatic brain injury (TBI), but whether similar efficacy extends to females is not well established. Hence, the aim of this study was to reassess the effect of EE on functional and histological outcome in female rats after brain trauma. Twenty-four normal cycling adult female rats underwent verification of estrous stage prior to controlled cortical impact (CCI) or sham injury and then were assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing. Motor function was assessed with beam-balance/beam-walk and rotarod tasks on post-operative days 1-5 and every other day from 1-19, respectively. Spatial learning/memory was evaluated in a Morris water maze on days 14-19. Morphologically intact hippocampal CA(1/3) cells and cortical lesion volume were quantified 3 weeks after injury. No differences were observed between the EE and STD sham groups in any endpoint measure and thus the data were pooled. In the TBI groups, EE improved beam-balance, beam-walk, rotarod, and spatial learning performance vs. STD (p's<0.05). EE also provided significant histological protection as confirmed by increased CA(1/3) cell survival and decreased cortical lesion size vs. STD. These data demonstrate that EE confers robust benefits in female rats after CCI injury, which parallels numerous studies in males and lends further credence for EE as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Monaco
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cheng JP, Shaw KE, Monaco CM, Hoffman AN, Sozda CN, Olsen AS, Kline AE. A relatively brief exposure to environmental enrichment after experimental traumatic brain injury confers long-term cognitive benefits. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29:2684-8. [PMID: 22774771 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
It is well established that a relatively brief exposure to environmental enrichment (EE) enhances motor and cognitive performance after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI), but it is not known whether the benefits can be sustained after EE is discontinued. To address this important rehabilitation-relevant concern, anesthetized rats received a controlled cortical impact (CCI) or sham injury, and for phase 1 of the experiment were randomly assigned to either 3 weeks of EE or standard (STD) housing. Neurobehavioral outcome was assessed by established motor and cognitive tests on postoperative days 1-5 and 14-18, respectively. Beam-balance and spatial learning were facilitated in the TBI + EE more than the TBI + STD group (p<0.0001). In phase 2 of the experiment, half of the rats in EE were transferred to STD conditions (TBI + EE + STD and sham + EE + STD), and neurobehavior was re-assessed once per month for 6 months. The TBI + EE and TBI + EE + STD groups performed markedly better in the water maze than the TBI + STD group (p<0.0001), and did not differ from one another (p=0.53). These data replicate those of several studies from our laboratory showing that EE enhances recovery after CCI injury, and extend those findings by demonstrating that the cognitive benefits are maintained for at least 6 months post-rehabilitation. The persistent benefits shown with this paradigm provide further support for EE as a pre-clinical model of rehabilitation that can be further explored, either alone or in combination with pharmacotherapies, for optimal neurorehabilitation after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
McConeghy KW, Hatton J, Hughes L, Cook AM. A review of neuroprotection pharmacology and therapies in patients with acute traumatic brain injury. CNS Drugs 2012; 26:613-36. [PMID: 22668124 DOI: 10.2165/11634020-000000000-00000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects 1.6 million Americans annually. The injury severity impacts the overall outcome and likelihood for survival. Current treatment of acute TBI includes surgical intervention and supportive care therapies. Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure and optimizing cerebral perfusion are cornerstones of current therapy. These approaches do not directly address the secondary neurological sequelae that lead to continued brain injury after TBI. Depending on injury severity, a complex cascade of processes are activated and generate continued endogenous changes affecting cellular systems and overall outcome from the initial insult to the brain. Homeostatic cellular processes governing calcium influx, mitochondrial function, membrane stability, redox balance, blood flow and cytoskeletal structure often become dysfunctional after TBI. Interruption of this cascade has been the target of numerous pharmacotherapeutic agents investigated over the last two decades. Many agents such as selfotel, pegorgotein (PEG-SOD), magnesium, deltibant and dexanabinol were ineffective in clinical trials. While progesterone and ciclosporin have shown promise in phase II studies, success in larger phase III, randomized, multicentre, clinical trials is pending. Consequently, no neuroprotective treatment options currently exist that improve neurological outcome after TBI. Investigations to date have extended understanding of the injury mechanisms and sites for intervention. Examination of novel strategies addressing both pathological and pharmacological factors affecting outcome, employing novel trial design methods and utilizing biomarkers validated to be reflective of the prognosis for TBI will facilitate progress in overcoming the obstacles identified from previous clinical trials.
Collapse
|
35
|
Kline AE, Olsen AS, Sozda CN, Hoffman AN, Cheng JP. Evaluation of a combined treatment paradigm consisting of environmental enrichment and the 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29:1960-9. [PMID: 22471653 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) and serotonin(1A) (5-HT(1A))-receptor agonists provide significant benefit after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that combining these therapies would produce an effect that is more robust than either therapy alone. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing where they received either buspirone (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle (1.0 mL/kg) once daily for 3 weeks. Motor and cognitive assessments were conducted on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. CA1/3 neurons were quantified at 3 weeks. No differences were observed among buspirone and vehicle sham groups in any task regardless of housing condition and thus the data were pooled. CA3 cell loss was reduced in the TBI+EE+buspirone and TBI+EE+vehicle groups. Motor recovery, spatial learning, and memory retention were enhanced in the TBI+EE+buspirone, TBI+EE+vehicle, and TBI+STD+buspirone groups versus the TBI+STD+vehicle group (p ≤ 0.005). Moreover, spatial learning was significantly better in the TBI+EE+buspirone group versus the TBI+STD+buspirone group (p<0.0001). No differences were revealed between the buspirone and vehicle EE groups. These data show that EE and buspirone benefit functional outcome after TBI, but their combination is not more robust than either alone, which does not support the hypothesis. The lack of an additive effect may be due to the early-and-continuous EE paradigm on its own producing marked benefits, resulting in a ceiling effect. The evaluation of buspirone in a delayed-and-abbreviated EE paradigm is ongoing in our laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony E Kline
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Olsen AS, Sozda CN, Cheng JP, Hoffman AN, Kline AE. Traumatic brain injury-induced cognitive and histological deficits are attenuated by delayed and chronic treatment with the 5-HT1A-receptor agonist buspirone. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29:1898-907. [PMID: 22416854 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of the serotonin(1A) (5-HT(1A)) receptor agonist buspirone (BUS) on behavioral and histological outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Ninety-six isoflurane-anesthetized adult male rats were randomized to receive either a controlled cortical impact or sham injury, and then assigned to six TBI and six sham groups receiving one of five doses of BUS (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 mg/kg) or saline vehicle (VEH, 1.0 mL/kg). Treatments began 24 h after surgery and were administered intraperitoneally once daily for 3 weeks. Motor function (beam-balance/beam-walk tests) and spatial learning/memory (Morris water maze) were assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Morphologically intact CA1/CA3 cells and cortical lesion volume were quantified at 3 weeks. No differences were observed among the BUS and VEH sham groups in any end-point measure and thus the data were pooled. Regarding the TBI groups, repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed that the 0.3 mg/kg dose of BUS enhanced cognitive performance relative to VEH and the other BUS doses (p<0.05), but did not significantly impact motor function. Moreover, the same dose conferred selective histological protection as evidenced by smaller cortical lesions, but not greater CA1/CA3 cell survival. No significant behavioral or histological differences were observed among the other BUS doses versus VEH. These data indicate that BUS has a narrow therapeutic dose response, and that 0.3 mg/kg is optimal for enhancing spatial learning and memory in this model of TBI. BUS may have potential as a novel pharmacotherapy for clinical TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S Olsen
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wagner AK, Zitelli KT. A Rehabilomics focused perspective on molecular mechanisms underlying neurological injury, complications, and recovery after severe TBI. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 20:39-48. [PMID: 22444246 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The molecular mechanisms underlying TBI pathophysiology and recovery are both complex and varied. Further, the pathology underlying many of the clinical sequelae observed in this population evolve over the acute injury period and encompass the subacute and chronic phases of recovery, supporting the contemporary concept that TBI is a chronic disease rather than a static insult from which limited recovery occurs. TBI related complications can also span from acute care to the very chronic stages of recovery that occur years after the initial trauma. Despite ongoing neurodegeneration, the TBI recovery period is also characterized by a propensity for neuroplasticity and rewiring through multiple mechanisms. This review summarizes key elements of acute pathophysiology, how they link to structural damage and ongoing degeneration, and how this process coincides with a permissive neuroplastic environment. The pathophysiology of selected TBI related complications is also discussed. Each of these concepts is studied through the lens of Rehabilomics, wherein an emphasis is placed on biomarker studies characterizing these pathophysiological mechanisms, and biomarker profiles are assessed in relation to multi-modal outcomes and susceptibility to rehabilitation relevant complications. In reviewing these concepts, implications for future research and theranostic principles for patient care are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy K Wagner
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, United States; Center for Neuroscience University of Pittsburgh, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yelleswarapu NK, Tay JK, Fryer WM, Shah MA, Garcia AN, Cheng JP, Kline AE. Elucidating the role of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(7) receptors on 8-OH-DPAT-induced behavioral recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Lett 2012; 515:153-6. [PMID: 22465320 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2012] [Revised: 03/08/2012] [Accepted: 03/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
8-OH-DPAT is a 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist that enhances behavioral recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study is a first attempt to decipher whether the benefits induced by 8-OH-DPAT after TBI are mediated by 5-HT(1A) or 5-HT(7) receptors. A single i.p. injection of 8-OH-DPAT (0.5 mg/kg) alone or co-administered with either the 5-HT(1A) or 5-HT(7) receptor antagonists WAY 100635 (0.5 mg/kg) or SB 269970 HCl (2.0 mg/kg), respectively, or vehicle control (1.0 mL/kg) was given 15 min after cortical impact or sham injury. Function was assessed by established motor and cognitive tests. No difference in motor performance was observed among the TBI groups. Spatial acquisition was enhanced, relative to vehicle controls, by 8-OH-DPAT alone and when co-administered with WAY 100635, but not when combined with SB 269970 HCl. These data imply that 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonism does not abate the 8-OH-DPAT-induced cognitive benefits, but 5-HT(7) receptor antagonism does, which suggests that the 8-OH-DPAT-induced benefits in this single administration paradigm may be mediated more by 5-HT(7) versus 5-HT(1A) receptors. Evaluation of a specific 5-HT(7) receptor agonist will further elucidate the contribution of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(7) receptors on behavioral recovery conferred by acute 8-OH-DPAT treatment after TBI.
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang Y, Neumann M, Hansen K, Hong SM, Kim S, Noble-Haeusslein LJ, Liu J. Fluoxetine increases hippocampal neurogenesis and induces epigenetic factors but does not improve functional recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28:259-68. [PMID: 21175261 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine induces hippocampal neurogenesis, stimulates maturation and synaptic plasticity of adult hippocampal neurons, and reduces motor/sensory and memory impairments in several CNS disorders. In the setting of traumatic brain injury (TBI), its effects on neuroplasticity and function have yet to be thoroughly investigated. Here we examined the efficacy of fluoxetine after a moderate to severe TBI, produced by a controlled cortical impact. Three days after TBI or sham surgery, mice were treated with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg/d) or vehicle for 4 weeks. To evaluate the effects of fluoxetine on neuroplasticity, hippocampal neurogenesis and epigenetic modification were studied. Stereologic analysis of the dentate gyrus revealed a significant increase in doublecortin-positive cells in brain-injured animals treated with fluoxetine relative to controls, a finding consistent with enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis. Epigenetic modifications, including an increase in histone 3 acetylation and induction of methyl-CpG-binding protein, a transcription factor involved in DNA methylation, were likewise seen by immunohistochemistry and quantitative Western immunoblots, respectively, in brain-injured animals treated with fluoxetine. To determine if fluoxetine improves neurological outcomes after TBI, gait function and spatial learning and memory were assessed by the CatWalk-assisted gait test and Barnes maze test, respectively. No differences in these parameters were seen between fluoxetine- and vehicle-treated animals. Thus while fluoxetine enhanced neuroplasticity in the hippocampus after TBI, its chronic administration did not restore locomotor function or ameliorate memory deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonggang Wang
- San Francisco Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Biologic and plastic effects of experimental traumatic brain injury treatment paradigms and their relevance to clinical rehabilitation. PM R 2011; 3:S18-27. [PMID: 21703575 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2011] [Accepted: 03/22/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Neuroplastic changes, whether induced by traumatic brain injury (TBI) or therapeutic interventions, alter neurobehavioral outcome. Here we present several treatment strategies that have been evaluated by using experimental TBI models and discuss potential mechanisms of action (ie, plasticity) and how such changes affect function.
Collapse
|
41
|
Basaveswara Rao MV, Nagendrakumar AVD, Maiti S, Raja G. Validated RP-HPLC Method for the Determination of Buspirone in Pharmaceutical Formulations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.4061/2011/232505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
A simple, selective, linear, precise, and accurate RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for the rapid assay of the Buspirone in tablet dosage form. Isocratic elution at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min was employed on a symmetry C18 (250×4.6 mm, 5 μm in particle size) at ambient temperature. The mobile phase consisted of water : acetonitrile : methanol 45 : 35 : 20(V/V). The UV detection wavelength was 210 nm, and 20 μL sample was injected. The retention time for the Buspirone was 7.057 min. The percentage RSD for precision and accuracy of the method was found to be less than 2%. The method was validated as per the ICH guidelines. The method can be successfully applied for the routine analysis of Buspirone in tablet dosage form.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sushanta Maiti
- Department of Chemistry, Krishna University, Machilipatnam 521001, A.P, India
| | - Guttikonda Raja
- Department of Chemistry, Krishna University, Machilipatnam 521001, A.P, India
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Khan M, Sakakima H, Dhammu TS, Shunmugavel A, Im YB, Gilg AG, Singh AK, Singh I. S-nitrosoglutathione reduces oxidative injury and promotes mechanisms of neurorepair following traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neuroinflammation 2011; 8:78. [PMID: 21733162 PMCID: PMC3158546 DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2011] [Accepted: 07/06/2011] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) induces primary and secondary damage in both the endothelium and the brain parenchyma, collectively termed the neurovascular unit. While neurons die quickly by necrosis, a vicious cycle of secondary injury in endothelial cells exacerbates the initial injury in the neurovascular unit following TBI. In activated endothelial cells, excessive superoxide reacts with nitric oxide (NO) to form peroxynitrite. Peroxynitrite has been implicated in blood brain barrier (BBB) leakage, altered metabolic function, and neurobehavioral impairment. S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), a nitrosylation-based signaling molecule, was reported not only to reduce brain levels of peroxynitrite and oxidative metabolites but also to improve neurological function in TBI, stroke, and spinal cord injury. Therefore, we investigated whether GSNO promotes the neurorepair process by reducing the levels of peroxynitrite and the degree of oxidative injury. METHODS TBI was induced by controlled cortical impact (CCI) in adult male rats. GSNO or 3-Morpholino-sydnonimine (SIN-1) (50 μg/kg body weight) was administered orally two hours following CCI. The same dose was repeated daily until endpoints. GSNO-treated (GSNO group) or SIN-1-treated (SIN-1 group) injured animals were compared with vehicle-treated injured animals (TBI group) and vehicle-treated sham-operated animals (Sham group) in terms of peroxynitrite, NO, glutathione (GSH), lipid peroxidation, blood brain barrier (BBB) leakage, edema, inflammation, tissue structure, axon/myelin integrity, and neurotrophic factors. RESULTS SIN-1 treatment of TBI increased whereas GSNO treatment decreased peroxynitrite, lipid peroxides/aldehydes, BBB leakage, inflammation and edema in a short-term treatment (4-48 hours). GSNO also reduced brain infarctions and enhanced the levels of NO and GSH. In a long-term treatment (14 days), GSNO protected axonal integrity, maintained myelin levels, promoted synaptic plasticity, and enhanced the expression of neurotrophic factors. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate the participation of peroxynitrite in the pathobiology of TBI. GSNO treatment of TBI not only reduces peroxynitrite but also protects the integrity of the neurovascular unit, indicating that GSNO blunts the deleterious effects of peroxynitrite. A long-term treatment of TBI with the same low dose of GSNO promotes synaptic plasticity and enhances the expression of neurotrophic factors. These results support that GSNO reduces the levels of oxidative metabolites, protects the neurovascular unit, and promotes neurorepair mechanisms in TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mushfiquddin Khan
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Heo S, Patil SS, Jung G, Höger H, Lubec G. A serotonin receptor 1A containing complex in hippocampus of PWD/PhJ mice is linked to training effects in the Barnes maze. Behav Brain Res 2011; 216:389-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2010] [Revised: 08/09/2010] [Accepted: 08/16/2010] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
44
|
Therapeutic targets for neuroprotection and/or enhancement of functional recovery following traumatic brain injury. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2011; 98:85-131. [PMID: 21199771 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-385506-0.00003-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern. The number of injuries that occur each year, the cost of care, and the disabilities that can lower the victim's quality of life are all driving factors for the development of therapy. However, in spite of a wealth of promising preclinical results, clinicians are still lacking a therapy. The use of preclinical models of the primary mechanical trauma have greatly advanced our knowledge of the complex biochemical sequela that follow. This cascade of molecular, cellular, and systemwide changes involves plasticity in many different neurochemical systems, which represent putative targets for remediation or attenuation of neuronal injury. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight some of the promising molecular and cellular targets that have been identified and to provide an up-to-date summary of the development of therapeutic compounds for those targets.
Collapse
|
45
|
de Witt BW, Ehrenberg KM, McAloon RL, Panos AH, Shaw KE, Raghavan PV, Skidmore ER, Kline AE. Abbreviated environmental enrichment enhances neurobehavioral recovery comparably to continuous exposure after traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 25:343-50. [PMID: 21186330 DOI: 10.1177/1545968310390520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Environmental enrichment (EE) is a complex living milieu that has been shown to enhance functional recovery versus standard (STD) housing after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) and therefore may be considered a rodent correlate of rehabilitation. However, the typical EE paradigm consists of continuous exposure to enrichment after TBI, which is inconsistent with the limited time frame in clinical rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE To determine whether abbreviated EE (ie, rehabilitation-relevant dose response) confers benefits similar to typical EE after TBI. METHODS Adult male rats received either a controlled cortical impact (2.8 mm depth at 4 m/s) or sham injury and were then randomly assigned to TBI + EE, TBI + EE (2 hours), TBI + EE (4 hours), TBI + EE (6 hours), TBI + STD, and respective sham controls. Motor (beam balance/beam walk) and cognitive (Morris water maze) performance was assessed on postoperative days 1 to 5 and 14 to 19, respectively. RESULTS The TBI + EE (2 hours) and TBI + EE (4 hours) groups were not statistically different from the TBI + STD group in any behavioral assessment. In contrast, the TBI + EE (6 hours) group exhibited significant enhancement of motor and cognitive performance when compared with the TBI + STD group, as well as the TBI + EE (2 hours) and TBI + EE (4 hours) groups (P < .003), and did not differ from the TBI + EE (typical) group. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate that abbreviated EE (6 hours) produces motor and cognitive benefits similar to continuous EE after TBI and thus may be considered a dose-relevant rehabilitation paradigm.
Collapse
|
46
|
Kline AE, McAloon RL, Henderson KA, Bansal UK, Ganti BM, Ahmed RH, Gibbs RB, Sozda CN. Evaluation of a combined therapeutic regimen of 8-OH-DPAT and environmental enrichment after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27:2021-32. [PMID: 21028935 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
When provided individually, both the serotonin (5-HT(1A))-receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and environmental enrichment (EE) enhance behavioral outcome and reduce histopathology after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to determine whether combining these therapies would yield greater benefit than either used alone. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to enriched or standard (STD) housing, where either 8-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg) or vehicle (1.0 mL/kg) was administered intraperitoneally once daily for 3 weeks. Motor and cognitive assessments were conducted on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. CA1/CA3 neurons and choline acetyltransferase-positive (ChAT(+)) medial septal cells were quantified at 3 weeks. 8-OH-DPAT and EE attenuated CA3 and ChAT(+) cell loss. Both therapies also enhanced motor recovery, acquisition of spatial learning, and memory retention, as verified by reduced times to traverse the beam and to locate an escape platform in the water maze, and a greater percentage of time spent searching in the target quadrant during a probe trial in the TBI + STD + 8-OH-DPAT, TBI + EE + 8-OH-DPAT, and TBI + EE + vehicle groups versus the TBI + STD + vehicle group (p ≤ 0.0016). No statistical distinctions were revealed between the TBI + EE + 8-OH-DPAT and TBI + EE + vehicle groups in functional outcome or CA1/CA3 cell survival, but there were significantly more ChAT(+) cells in the former (p = 0.003). These data suggest that a combined therapeutic regimen of 8-OH-DPAT and EE reduces TBI-induced ChAT(+) cell loss, but does not enhance hippocampal cell survival or neurobehavioral performance beyond that of either treatment alone. The findings underscore the complexity of combinational therapies and of elucidating potential targets for TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sozda CN, Hoffman AN, Olsen AS, Cheng JP, Zafonte RD, Kline AE. Empirical comparison of typical and atypical environmental enrichment paradigms on functional and histological outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27:1047-57. [PMID: 20334496 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Several studies have shown that housing rats in an enriched environment (EE) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) improves functional and histological outcome. The typical EE includes exploratory, sensory, and social components in cages that are often vastly larger than standard (STD) housing. It is uncertain, however, whether a single or specific component is sufficient to confer these benefits after TBI, or if all, perhaps in an additive or synergistic manner, are necessary. To clarify this ambiguity, anesthetized adult male rats were subjected to either a controlled cortical impact or sham injury, and then were randomly assigned to five different housing paradigms: (1) EE (typical), (2) EE (-social), (3) EE (-stimuli), (4) STD (typical), and (5) STD (+stimuli). Motor and cognitive function were assessed using conventional motor (beam-balance/traversal) and cognitive (spatial learning in a Morris water maze) tests on postoperative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively, and cortical lesion volume and CA1/CA3 cell loss were quantified at 3 weeks. No significant differences were observed among the sham groups in any comparison and thus their data were pooled (i.e., SHAM). In the TBI groups, typical EE improved beam-balance versus both STD (+stimuli) and EE (-social), it facilitated the acquisition of spatial learning and memory retention versus all other housing conditions (p < 0.003), and it reduced lesion volume and CA3 cell loss versus STD (typical) housing. While rats in the three atypical EE conditions exhibited slightly better cognitive performance and histological protection versus the typical STD group, the overall effects were not significant. These data suggest that exposing TBI rats to any of the three components individually may be more advantageous than no enrichment, but only exposure to typical EE yields optimal benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher N Sozda
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Khan M, Im YB, Shunmugavel A, Gilg AG, Dhindsa RK, Singh AK, Singh I. Administration of S-nitrosoglutathione after traumatic brain injury protects the neurovascular unit and reduces secondary injury in a rat model of controlled cortical impact. J Neuroinflammation 2009; 6:32. [PMID: 19889224 PMCID: PMC2777134 DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-6-32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2009] [Accepted: 11/04/2009] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of preventable death and serious morbidity in young adults. This complex pathological condition is characterized by significant blood brain barrier (BBB) leakage that stems from cerebral ischemia, inflammation, and redox imbalances in the traumatic penumbra of the injured brain. Once trauma has occurred, combating these exacerbations is the keystone of an effective TBI therapy. Following other brain injuries, nitric oxide modulators such as S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) maintain not only redox balance but also inhibit the mechanisms of secondary injury. Therefore, we tested whether GSNO shows efficacy in a rat model of experimental TBI. Methods TBI was induced by controlled cortical impact (CCI) in adult male rats. GSNO (50 μg/kg body weight) was administered at two hours after CCI. GSNO-treated injured animals (CCI+GSNO group) were compared with vehicle-treated injured animals (CCI+VEH group) in terms of tissue morphology, BBB leakage, edema, inflammation, cell death, and neurological deficit. Results Treatment of the TBI animals with GSNO reduced BBB disruption as evidenced by decreased Evan's blue extravasation across brain, infiltration/activation of macrophages (ED1 positive cells), and reduced expression of ICAM-1 and MMP-9. The GSNO treatment also restored CCI-mediated reduced expression of BBB integrity proteins ZO-1 and occludin. GSNO-mediated improvements in tissue histology shown by reduction of lesion size and decreased loss of both myelin (measured by LFB staining) and neurons (assayed by TUNEL) further support the efficacy of GSNO therapy. GSNO-mediated reduced expression of iNOS in macrophages as well as decreased neuronal cell death may be responsible for the histological improvement and reduced exacerbations. In addition to these biochemical and histological improvements, GSNO-treated injured animals recovered neurobehavioral functions as evaluated by the rotarod task and neurological score measurements. Conclusion GSNO is a promising candidate to be evaluated in humans after brain trauma because it not only protects the traumatic penumbra from secondary injury and improves overall tissue structure but also maintains the integrity of BBB and reduces neurologic deficits following CCI in a rat model of experimental TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mushfiquddin Khan
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bales JW, Wagner AK, Kline AE, Dixon CE. Persistent cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: A dopamine hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009; 33:981-1003. [PMID: 19580914 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2009] [Revised: 03/10/2009] [Accepted: 03/23/2009] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant cause of death and disability in industrialized countries. Of particular importance to patients the chronic effect that TBI has on cognitive function. Therapeutic strategies have been difficult to evaluate because of the complexity of injuries and variety of patient presentations within a TBI population. However, pharmacotherapies targeting dopamine (DA) have consistently shown benefits in attention, behavioral outcome, executive function, and memory. Still it remains unclear what aspect of TBI pathology is targeted by DA therapies and what time-course of treatment is most beneficial for patient outcomes. Fortunately, ongoing research in animal models has begun to elucidate the pathophysiology of DA alterations after TBI. The purpose of this review is to discuss clinical and experimental research examining DAergic therapies after TBI, which will in turn elucidate the importance of DA for cognitive function/dysfunction after TBI as well as highlight the areas that require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Bales
- Brain Trauma Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pharmacotherapy to enhance arousal: what is known and what is not. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2009; 177:293-316. [PMID: 19818909 DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17720-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Severe brain injury results in a disturbance among a wide range of critical neurotransmitter systems. Each neurotransmitter system places its own functional role while being interconnected to a multitude of other systems and functions. This chapter seeks to review the major neurotransmitter systems involved after severe acquired brain injury. While limited in their construct, animal models of brain injury have demonstrated agents that may assist in the recovery process and those that may further slow recovery. We review further the issue of laboratory evidence and what is transferable to the clinic. Lastly, this chapter reviews published clinical pharmacotherapy studies or trials in the arena of arousal for those with clinical severe brain injury. We discuss limitations as well as findings and present the available evidence in a table-based format. While no clear evidence exists to suggest a defined and rigid pharmacotherapeutic approach, interesting data does suggest that several medications have been associated with enhanced arousal. Several studies are underway or about to begin that will shed more light on the utility of such agents in improving function after severe brain injury. For now, clinicians must employ their own judgment and what has been learned from the limited literature to the care of a challenging group of persons.
Collapse
|