Differential contribution of perirhinal cortex and hippocampus to taste neophobia: Effect of neurotoxic lesions

Neural responses to oral administration of erythritol vs. sucrose and sucralose explain differences in subjective liking ratings

INTRODUCTION

High sugar intake is associated with many chronic diseases. However, non-caloric sweeteners (NCSs) might fail to successfully replace sucrose due to the mismatch between their rewarding sweet taste and lack of caloric content. The natural NCS erythritol has been proposed as a sugar substitute due to its satiating properties despite being non-caloric. We aimed to compare brain responses to erythritol vs. sucrose and the artificial NCS sucralose in a priori taste, homeostatic, and reward brain regions of interest (ROIs).

METHODS

We performed a within-subject, single-blind, counterbalanced fMRI study in 30 healthy men (mean ± SEM age:24.3 ± 0.8 years, BMI:22.3 ± 0.3 kg/m2). Before scanning, we individually matched the concentrations of both NCSs to the perceived sweetness intensity of a 10% sucrose solution. During scanning, participants received 1 mL sips of the individually titrated equisweet solutions of sucrose, erythritol, and sucralose, as well as water. After each sip, they rated subjective sweetness liking.

RESULTS

Liking ratings were significantly higher for sucrose and sucralose vs. erythritol (both pHolm = 0.0037); water ratings were neutral. General Linear Model (GLM) analyses of brain blood oxygen level-depended (BOLD) responses at qFDR<0.05 showed no differences between any of the sweeteners in a priori ROIs, but distinct differences were found between the individual sweeteners and water. These results were confirmed by Bayesian GLM and machine learning-based models. However, several brain response patterns mediating the differences in liking ratings between the sweeteners were found in whole-brain multivariate mediation analyses. Both subjective and neural responses showed large inter-subject variability.

CONCLUSION

We found lower liking ratings in response to oral administration of erythritol vs. sucrose and sucralose, but no differences in neural responses between any of the sweeteners in a priori ROIs. However, differences in liking ratings between erythritol vs. sucrose or sucralose are mediated by multiple whole-brain response patterns.

Expression of c-Fos following voluntary ingestion of a novel or familiar taste in rats

Taste neophobia, the rejection of novel tastes or foods, involves an interplay of various brain regions encompassing areas within the central gustatory system, as well as nuclei serving other functions. Previous findings, utilising c-Fos imaging, identified several brain regions which displayed higher activity after ingestion of a novel taste as compared to a familiar taste. The present study extends this analysis to include additional regions suspected of contributing to the neurocircuitry involved in evoking taste neophobia. Our data show increased c-Fos expression in the basolateral amygdala, central nucleus of the amygdala, gustatory portion of the thalamus, gustatory portion of the insular cortex and the medial and lateral regions of the parabrachial nucleus. These results confirm the contribution of areas previously identified as active during ingestion of novel tastes and expose additional areas that express elevated levels of c-Fos under these conditions, thus adding to the neural network involved in the detection and initial processing of taste novelty.

Inactivation of the ventral hippocampus facilitates the attenuation of odor neophobia in rats

Food neophobia is a behavior observed in rodents involving reduced consumption of a novel food or drink. In the absence of negative post-ingestive consequences, consumption increases with exposure (attenuation of neophobia), which is seen as an associative safe memory. Olfaction and gustation are sensory modalities essential for the development of a food preference. However, little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying neophobia to a food-related odor stimulus. In the present study, we examined the effect of pharmacological inactivation of the ventral hippocampus (vHPC) on neophobia to orally consumed solutions in rats using muscimol, a gamma aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonist. Two different types of solutions, almond odor (benzaldehyde) and sweet taste (saccharin), were prepared. In the results, microinjections of muscimol into the bilateral vHPC before the first odor and taste exposures did not alter the neophobic reactions of the rats to each stimulus. However, in the second odor, but not taste, exposure, the muscimol-injected rats showed higher consumption in comparison to that observed in the control rats, suggesting that the vHPC inactivation facilitates the attenuation of odor neophobia. On the other hand, intra-vHPC muscimol microinjections after the first odor and taste exposures did not facilitate consumption at the second exposures. These results indicate that neural activations within vHPC during orally consuming a novel odor, but not taste, solution play an inhibitory role in the subsequent attenuation of neophobia.

Perirhinal cortex lesions impair tests of object recognition memory but spare novelty detection

The present study examined why perirhinal cortex lesions in rats impair the spontaneous ability to select novel objects in preference to familiar objects, when both classes of object are presented simultaneously. The study began by repeating this standard finding, using a test of delayed object recognition memory. As expected, the perirhinal cortex lesions reduced the difference in exploration times for novel vs. familiar stimuli. In contrast, the same rats with perirhinal cortex lesions appeared to perform normally when the preferential exploration of novel vs. familiar objects was tested sequentially, i.e. when each trial consisted of only novel or only familiar objects. In addition, there was no indication that the perirhinal cortex lesions reduced total levels of object exploration for novel objects, as would be predicted if the lesions caused novel stimuli to appear familiar. Together, the results show that, in the absence of perirhinal cortex tissue, rats still receive signals of object novelty, although they may fail to link that information to the appropriate object. Consequently, these rats are impaired in discriminating the source of object novelty signals, leading to deficits on simultaneous choice tests of recognition.