Loss of CYP3A7 gene induction by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 is caused by less binding of VDR to the proximal ER6 in CYP3A7 gene

Role of vitamin D receptor in the regulation of CYP3A gene expression

Vitamin D₃ (VD₃) is a multifunctional nutrient which can be either synthesized or absorbed from the diet. It plays a pivotal role in systemic calcium and phosphate homeostasis, as well as in various physiological and pathological processes. VD₃ is converted to the active form, 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (1,25-D3), by cytochrome P450 2R1 (CYP2R1)/CYP27A1 and CYP27B1 sequentially, and deactivated by multiple enzymes including CYP3A4. On the other hand, 1,25-D3 is capable of activating the transcription of CYP3A genes in humans, mice and rats. The vitamin D receptor (VDR)-mediated transactivation of human CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 resembles that known for pregnane X receptor (PXR). Activated VDR forms a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor α (RXRα), recruits co-activators, translocates to the cell nucleus, binds to the specific vitamin D responsive elements (VDRE), and activates the gene transcription. In mice, intestinal Cyp3a11 mRNA levels, but not those of hepatic CYP3As, were induced by in vivo administration of VDR and PXR agonists. In rats, intestinal Cyp3a1 and Cyp3a2 mRNAs were induced by 1,25-D3 or lithocholic acid (LCA), whereas hepatic Cyp3a2, but not Cyp3a1 and Cyp3a9, was modulated to 1,25-D3 treatment. In general, the VDR-mediated regulation of CYP3A presents species and organ specificity.

Neonatal cytochrome P450 CYP3A7: A comprehensive review of its role in development, disease, and xenobiotic metabolism

The human cytochrome P450 CYP3A7, once thought to be an enzyme exclusive to fetal livers, has more recently been identified in neonates and developing infants as old as 24 months post-gestational age. CYP3A7 has been demonstrated to metabolize two endogenous compounds that are known to be important in the growth and development of the fetus and neonate, namely dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and all-trans retinoic acid (atRA). In addition, it is also known to metabolize a variety of drugs and xenobiotics, albeit generally to a lesser extent relative to CYP3A4/5. CYP3A7 is an important component in the development and protection of the fetal liver and additionally plays a role in certain disease states, such as cancer and adrenal hyperplasia. Ultimately, a full understanding of the expression, regulation, and metabolic properties of CYP3A7 is needed to provide neonates with appropriate individualized pharmacotherapy. This article summarizes the current state of knowledge of CYP3A7, including its discovery, distribution, alleles, RNA splicing, expression and regulation, metabolic properties, substrates, and inhibitors.

Regulation of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 expression and modulation of "intracrine" metabolism of androgens in prostate cells by liganded vitamin D receptor

We investigated the capacity for vitamin D receptor (VDR) to modulate the expression of CYP3A4 and other genes that may facilitate the oxidative inactivation of androgens such as testosterone and androstanediol within prostate cells. We report that exposure to the active hormonal form of vitamin D markedly increased gene expression of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and ultimately achieved levels of intracellular CYP3A enzyme activity within LNCaP prostate cancer cells that were comparable to that observed for Caco2 cells, an established model of CYP3A induction, and resulted in the increased turnover of testosterone to its inactive 6β-OH metabolite. We demonstrate that VDR directs CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 expression through binding to distinct regulatory motifs located within the 5' promoter regions of both genes. The current data highlight the potential application of VDR-based treatment regimes as a means to limit the bioavailability of growth-promoting androgens within the tumor microenvironment.

Comparison of two immortalized human cell lines to study nuclear receptor-mediated CYP3A4 induction

Since CYP3A4 is responsible for the biotransformation of over 50% of all clinically used drugs, induction results in an increased clearance of many concomitantly administered drugs, thereby decreasing treatment efficacy or, in the case of prodrugs, lead to severe intoxications. CYP3A4 induction is regulated by the pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, and vitamin D receptor. Since these nuclear receptors show large interspecies differences, accurate prediction of nuclear receptor-mediated CYP3A4 induction in humans requires the use of human systems. Because primary cultures of human hepatocytes or enterocytes have major drawbacks like poor availability and poor reproducibility, human cell lines are a good alternative. In this study, the widely used HepG2 cell line was compared with the LS180 cell line to serve as a model to study CYP3A4 induction. There was a clear difference between the cell lines with respect to CYP3A enzyme expression and induction. In LS180, CYP3A4 was expressed and was found to be induced by prototypical nuclear receptor agonists, whereas in HepG2, CYP3A4 was nonresponsive to treatment with rifampicin, CITCO [6-(4-chlorophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]thiazole-5-carbaldehyde-O-3,4-dichlorobenzyl) oxime], or calcitriol. We subsequently evaluated whether these host-cell differences also have an effect on CYP3A4 reporter gene activity. We clearly show that there are differences in CYP3A4 reporter activity between the cell lines, and based on these results and those found on mRNA and protein level, we conclude that LS180 is a more suitable cell line to study CYP3A4 induction than the widely used HepG2.

Gene variants in noncoding regions and their possible consequences

Human biodiversity or individual traits are not well explained by exonic mutations of all 20,000 known human genes. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that not all noncoding regions are junk DNA sequences, and that some functionally important noncoding variants contribute significantly to altered gene expression, qualitatively or quantitatively. Thus, functional profiling or clinical relevance of noncoding variations should not be underestimated or ignored. To validate these concepts, some important examples are discussed further in this short review.

Polymorphisms of human nuclear receptors that control expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes

Phenotypic variation in human drug metabolism frequently can be attributed to polymorphisms in genes that encode drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs). However, levels of Phase I and Phase II DMEs also vary because many of these enzymes are induced by a myriad of xenobiotic chemicals. Individual differences in the capacity for induction contribute to variation in drug metabolism in human populations. Induction is mediated by intracellular receptors that act as ligand-dependent transcription factors, including several members of the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). Genetic variations (SNPs and others) exist in genes that encode these human receptors but few of the known polymorphisms have any significant effect on enzyme induction. We suggest that the current scarcity of SNPs that are able to alter function in the DME-regulating NRs reflects considerable evolutionary selective pressures that conserve the key functional domains in these receptors.