Multidrug resistance protein 1 is not associated to detergent-resistant membranes

Arborinine, a potential LSD1 inhibitor, inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition of SGC-7901 cells and adriamycin-resistant gastric cancer SGC-7901/ADR cells

Arborinine is a natural product isolated from G. parva leaf extracts, which displays potentially antiproliferative activity against human cervical cancer cells. In contrast, its anticancer effects against gastric cancer cells and drug-resistant gastric cancer cells remain unknown. In this work, arborinine was evaluated as a broad-spectrum antiproliferative agent, and it exhibited potently inhibitory activity against NCI-N87 (IC50 = 5.67 μM), BGC-823 (IC50 = 7.26 μM), MGC803 (IC50 = 4.75 μM), SGC-7901 (IC50 = 1.96 μM), HGC-27 (IC50 = 5.70 μM), SGC-7901/ADR (IC50 = 0.24 μM), SGC-7901/VCR (IC50 = 1.09 μM), and MGC803/PTX (IC50 = 1.32 μM) cell lines. Subsequent target verification experiments demonstrated that arborinine selectively and reversibly inhibited LSD1 in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, it was found that arborinine suppressed the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901 and adriamycin-resistant gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901/ADR in a dose-dependent manner. The in vivo antitumor study further indicated that arborinine can significantly reduce the growth of tumors both in SGC-7901 and SGC-7901/ADR xenograft mouse models. Overall, we demonstrated the potential of arborinine as an effective treatment for gastric cancer and adriamycin-resistant gastric cancer.

Multidrug resistance protein 1 localization in lipid raft domains and prostasomes in prostate cancer cell lines

BACKGROUND

One of the problems in prostate cancer (CaP) treatment is the appearance of the multidrug resistance phenotype, in which ATP-binding cassette transporters such as multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) play a role. Different localizations of the transporter have been reported, some of them related to the chemoresistant phenotype.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the localization of MRP1 in three prostate cell lines (normal, androgen-sensitive, and androgen-independent) in order to understand its possible role in CaP chemoresistance.

METHODS

MRP1 and caveolae protein markers were detected using confocal microscopy, performing colocalization techniques. Lipid raft isolation made it possible to detect these proteins by Western blot analysis. Caveolae and prostasomes were identified by electron microscopy.

RESULTS

We show that MRP1 is found in lipid raft fractions of tumor cells and that the number of caveolae increases with malignancy acquisition. MRP1 is found not only in the plasma membrane associated with lipid rafts but also in cytoplasmic accumulations colocalizing with the prostasome markers Caveolin-1 and CD59, suggesting that in CaP cells, MRP1 is localized in prostasomes.

CONCLUSION

We hypothesize that the presence of MRP1 in prostasomes could serve as a reservoir of MRP1; thus, taking advantage of the release of their content, MRP1 could be translocated to the plasma membrane contributing to the chemoresistant phenotype. The presence of MRP1 in prostasomes could serve as a predictor of malignancy in CaP.

Bile salt-stimulated phospholipid efflux mediated by ABCB4 localized in nonraft membranes

ABCB4 is necessary for the secretion of phospholipids from hepatocytes into bile and for the protection of cell membranes against bile salts. Lipid rafts are plasma membrane microdomains containing high contents of cholesterol and sphingolipids, which are separated by Triton X-100 extraction or OptiPrep gradient centrifugation. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the function of ABCB4 and lipid rafts using mouse canalicular membranes and HEK293 cells stably expressing ABCB4. ABCB4 and ABCB1 were mainly distributed in nonraft membranes. The expression of ABCB4, but not ABCB1, led to significant increases in the phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and sphingomyelin (SM) contents in nonraft membranes and further enrichment of SM and cholesterol in raft membranes. The ABCB4-mediated efflux of PC, PE, and SM was significantly stimulated by taurocholate, while the efflux of PE and SM was much less than that of PC. This ABCB4-mediated efflux was completely abolished by BODIPY-verapamil, which hardly partitioned into raft membranes. In addition, ABCB1 and ABCB4 mediated the efflux of rhodamine 123 and rhodamine 6G from nonraft membranes, which was not affected by taurocholate. We conclude that ABCB4 located in nonrafts, but not in rafts, is predominantly involved in the efflux of phospholipids and other substrates.

Lipid dependence of ABC transporter localization and function

Lipid rafts have been implicated in many cellular functions, including protein and lipid transport and signal transduction. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters have also been localized in these membrane domains. In this review the evidence for this specific localization will be evaluated and discussed in terms of relevance to ABC transporter function. We will focus on three ABC transporters of the A, B and C subfamily, respectively. Two of these transporters are relevant to multidrug resistance in tumor cells (Pgp/ABCB1 and MRP1/ABCC1), while the third (ABCA1) is extensively studied in relation to the reverse cholesterol pathway and cellular cholesterol homeostasis. We will attempt to derive a generalized model of lipid rafts to which they associate based on the use of various different lipid raft isolation procedures. In the context of lipid rafts, modulation of ABC transporter localization and function by two relevant lipid classes, i.e. sphingolipids and cholesterol, will be discussed.

Expression of multidrug-resistance-related proteins P-glycoprotein, glutathione-S-transferases, topoisomerase-II and lung resistance protein in primary gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma

AIM

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is closely correlated to an unfavorable prognosis in various human cancers. However, the clinical significance of the expression of MDR-related proteins p-glycoprotein (PGP), glutathione-s-transferases (GST-pi), topoisomerase-II (Topo-II) and lung resistance protein (LRP) in primary gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (PGCA) remains unclear. In this present study, the total of the four kinds of MDR-related proteins mentioned above were detected by using immunohistochemistry, and their clinical significance in chemoresistance were also investigated.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 69 resected specimens from patients with PGCA. The expression of PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II and LRP in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections was determined by a labelled streptavidin-biotin immunohistochemical technique, and the results were analyzed in correlation with clinicopathological data. None of these patients received chemotherapy prior to surgery.

RESULTS

The positive rates of expression of PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II and LRP in malignant tissues (49.2%, 75.4%, 68.1% and 58%, respectively) were all higher than that of the normal tissues(0, 30%, 20% and 0, respectively, P < 0.01). PGP expression in tumors that had metastasized was significantly more frequent than in tumors that had not metastasized (67.5% vs 24.1%, P < 0.01). The expression of PGP was closely related with clinicopathologic staging (staging 1/2 vs 3/4, 28.6% vs 58.3%, P < 0.05). No significant correlation was shown between PGP and increasing differentiated degree (40%, 42.4% and 61.5%, P > 0.05). GST-pi expression status progressively increased with increasing differentiated degree (40%, 75.8% and 88.5%, P < 0.05) and clinicopathologic stage (staging 1/2 vs 3/4, 57.1% vs 83.3%, P < 0.05). In addition, a significant positive correlation was also observed between GST-pi and lymphatic metastasis (with vs. without metastasis, 87.5% vs 58.6%, P < 0.05). The expression of Topo-II was associated with increasing differentiated degree (33.3%, 69.7 and 80.7%, P < 0.01). No significant differences with Topo-II expression were found in relation to the clinicopathologic stage (staging 1/2 vs 3/4, 57.1% vs 72.9%, P > 0.05) and lymphatic metastasis (with vs. without metastasis, 65.0% vs 72.4%, P > 0.05). Moreover, a significant difference with the expression of LRP was found in relation to the clinicopathologic stage (staging 1/2 vs 3/4, 38% vs 66.6%, P < 0.05), and lymphatic metastasis (with vs without metastasis, 70.0% vs 41.4%, P < 0.05). Comparing the well, moderately and poorly differentiated cohort, a non-statistical increasing trend towards LRP expression status was noted (50.0%, 54.5% and 65.3%, respectively, P > 0.05). Besides, the co-expression of all four tested MDR-related proteins also existed. The positive rates of co-expression of PGP and GST-pi, PGP and Topo-II, PGP and LRP, GST-pi and Topo-II, LRP and GST-pi, LRP and Topo-II, PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II and LRP in malignant cells were 23.2%, 15.9%, 11.6%, 13.0, 26.1, 7.24, 5.8, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MDR-related proteins PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II alpha and LRP are involved in multiple mechanisms of drug resistance in PGCA. Combined determination of PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II and LRP may be prospectively valuable for optimizing the chemotherapy regimes, developing high quality anti-cancer drugs, and further predicting the outcomes of those patients with PGCA.