Evidence against adenosine analogues being agonists at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor

Pharmacological Modulation of Ghrelin to Induce Weight Loss: Successes and Challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity is affecting over 600 million adults worldwide and has numerous negative effects on health. Since ghrelin positively regulates food intake and body weight, targeting its signaling to induce weight loss under conditions of obesity seems promising. Thus, the present work reviews and discusses different possibilities to alter ghrelin signaling.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ghrelin signaling can be altered by RNA Spiegelmers, GHSR/Fc, ghrelin-O-acyltransferase inhibitors as well as antagonists, and inverse agonists of the ghrelin receptor. PF-05190457 is the first inverse agonist of the ghrelin receptor tested in humans shown to inhibit growth hormone secretion, gastric emptying, and reduce postprandial glucose levels. Effects on body weight were not examined. Although various highly promising agents targeting ghrelin signaling exist, so far, they were mostly only tested in vitro or in animal models. Further research in humans is thus needed to further assess the effects of ghrelin antagonism on body weight especially under conditions of obesity.

Receptor-specific crosstalk between prostanoid E receptor 3 and bombesin receptor subtype 3

Bombesin receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3) is a GPCR that is expressed in the CNS, peripheral tissues, and tumors. Our understanding of BRS-3's role in physiology and pathophysiology is limited because its natural ligand is unknown. In an attempt to identify this ligand, we screened toad skin ( Bufo bufo gargarizans Cantor) extracts and identified prostaglandins as putative ligands. In BRS-3-transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells, we found that prostaglandins, with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) being the most potent, fulfill the pharmacologic criteria of affinity, selectivity, and specificity to be considered as agonists to the BRS-3 receptor. However, PGE2 is unable to activate BRS-3 in different cellular environments. We speculated that EP receptors might be the cause of this cellular selectivity, and we found that EP₃ is the receptor primarily responsible for the differential PGE2 effect. Consequently, we reconstituted the HEK environment in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and found that BRS-3 and EP₃ interact to potentiate PGE2 signaling. This potentiating effect is receptor specific, and it occurs only when BRS-3 is paired to EP₃. Our study represents an example of functional crosstalk between two distantly related GPCRs and may be of clinical importance for BRS-3-targeted therapies.-Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Wu, L., Fan, C., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Alachkar, A., Liang, X., Civelli, O. Receptor-specific crosstalk between prostanoid E receptor 3 and bombesin receptor subtype 3.

Ghrelin receptor is activated by naringin and naringenin, constituents of a prokinetic agent Poncirus fructus

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Poncirus fructus (PF), also known as a dried immature fruit of Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. (Rutaceae), has long been traditionally used for the various gastrointestinal disorders in Eastern Asia.

AIM OF STUDY

The aqueous extract of PF (PF-W) has the strong prokinetic effect, yet the underlying mechanism is still elusive. The present study investigated whether PF-W has any effect on motilin receptor or ghrelin receptor, since these receptors enhance intestinal motility when activated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effect of PF-W and its components on motilin or ghrelin receptor was determined by calcium imaging and whole-cell patch clamp methods.

RESULTS

PF-W activates the ghrelin receptor, but not the motilin receptor, resulting in a transient increase of intracellular calcium levels. Furthermore, among various constituents of PF, only naringin and naringenin evoked the intracellular calcium augmentation via the ghrelin receptor. Moreover, cortistatin-8 - a ghrelin receptor inhibitor - specifically blocked naringin- and naringenin-induced calcium increases. In addition, naringin and naringenin induced inward currents in ghrelin receptor-expressing cells under whole-cell patch clamp configuration.

CONCLUSION

PF-W activates the ghrelin receptor, and naringin and naringenin are key constituents responsible for the activation of ghrelin receptor. Therefore, the present study suggests that the ghrelin receptor is a molecular entity responsible for the strong prokinetic activity of PF-W.

Involvement of adenosine signaling in controlling the release of ghrelin from the mouse stomach

Ghrelin, a potent orexigenic hormone released from the stomach, is important in regulating energy metabolism. Abnormal ghrelin levels are associated with eating disorders and metabolic diseases. However, factors involved in the regulation of ghrelin release remain unclear. Here, we examined the involvement of adenosine signaling in the control of ghrelin release from the perfused mouse stomach. Adenosine stimulated ghrelin release concentration-dependently, and the A(2A) receptor-selective antagonists 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol (ZM 241385) and 2-(2-furanyl)-7-(2-phenylethyl)-7H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-5-amine (SCH 58261) abolished the increased release. The A(2A) receptor-selective agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride (CGS 21680) augmented ghrelin release concentration-dependently, whereas the A(1) receptor-selective agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine inhibited ghrelin release. In A(2A) receptor knockout mice, adenosine inhibited ghrelin release, and the A(1) receptor-selective antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine blocked this inhibition. The adenosine deaminase inhibitor erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine hydrochloride increased ghrelin release in wild-type and A(1) receptor knockout mice but not in A(2A) receptor knockout mice. Colocalization of ghrelin immunoreactivity with A(1) and A(2A) receptor immunoreactivities in the gastric nerve fibers were observed. Colocalization was also detected for ghrelin and A(1) receptor immunoreactivities in the gastric mucosa. Blockade of neural activities with tetrodotoxin abolished the stimulatory effect of adenosine on ghrelin release. In conclusion, adenosine exerts predominantly a tonic A(2A) receptor-mediated stimulatory action on gastric ghrelin release, whereas an A(1) receptor-mediated inhibitory action is also apparent when the tonic excitatory effect was removed.

Physiological, pathological and potential therapeutic roles of ghrelin

Ghrelin, a hormone that is produced mainly by the stomach, was identified originally as the endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptor. Ghrelin might also be synthesized in other organs, where it might have autocrine or paracrine effects. GHS receptors are present in tissues other than the hypothalamus and pituitary, which indicates that ghrelin has other effects in addition to stimulating the release of growth hormone. Recently, it has been suggested that ghrelin might be involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases and be a therapeutic target in these diseases. Here, we provide an overview of the physiological effects of ghrelin and of its pathological and potential therapeutic roles.

Heterogeneity of ghrelin/growth hormone secretagogue receptors. Toward the understanding of the molecular identity of novel ghrelin/GHS receptors

Ghrelin is a gastric polypeptide displaying strong GH-releasing activity by activation of the type 1a GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a) located in the hypothalamus-pituitary axis. GHS-R1a is a G-protein-coupled receptor that, upon the binding of ghrelin or synthetic peptidyl and non-peptidyl ghrelin-mimetic agents known as GHS, preferentially couples to G(q), ultimately leading to increased intracellular calcium content. Beside the potent GH-releasing action, ghrelin and GHS influence food intake, gut motility, sleep, memory and behavior, glucose and lipid metabolism, cardiovascular performances, cell proliferation, immunological responses and reproduction. A growing body of evidence suggests that the cloned GHS-R1a alone cannot be the responsible for all these effects. The cloned GHS-R1b splice variant is apparently non-ghrelin/GHS-responsive, despite demonstration of expression in neoplastic tissues responsive to ghrelin not expressing GHS-R1a; GHS-R1a homologues sensitive to ghrelin are capable of interaction with GHS-R1b, forming heterodimeric species. Furthermore, GHS-R1a-deficient mice do not show evident abnormalities in growth and diet-induced obesity, suggesting the involvement of another receptor. Additional evidence of the existence of another receptor is that ghrelin and GHS do not always share the same biological activities and activate a variety of intracellular signalling systems besides G(q). The biological actions on the heart, adipose tissue, pancreas, cancer cells and brain shared by ghrelin and the non-acylated form of ghrelin (des-octanoyl ghrelin), which does not bind GHS-R1a, represent the best evidence for the existence of a still unknown, functionally active binding site for this family of molecules. Finally, located in the heart and blood vessels is the scavenger receptor CD36, involved in the endocytosis of the pro-atherogenic oxidized low-density lipoproteins, which is a pharmacologically and structurally distinct receptor for peptidyl GHS and not for ghrelin. This review highlights the most recently discovered features of GHS-R1a and the emerging evidence for a novel group of receptors that are not of the GHS1a type; these appear involved in the transduction of the multiple levels of information provided by GHS and ghrelin.

Mechanism of 2-chloroadenosine toxicity to PC3 cell line

BACKGROUND

2-CADO inhibits the growth of several types of cells and causes apoptosis by a mechanism which involves adenosine receptors or cellular uptake or both.

METHODS

Androgen-independent (PC3) prostate cancer cells were used in the study and proliferation, cell-cycle progression, and apoptosis analyzed. Deoxy-and ribonucleoside triphosphate pools were determined by HPLC. The molecular mechanism was examined by assessing the involvement of DNA synthesizing enzymes in the cellular response.

RESULTS

2-CADO treatment dramatically reduced the number of prostate cancer cells and permanently stopped cell-cycle progression in the S-phase. The role of 2-CADO in prostate cancer cells is uptake-mediated and followed by sequential phosphorylations to 2-Cl-ATP that irreversibly inhibits several key-enzymes for DNA biosynthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Arrest of DNA synthesis responsible for toxicity of 2-CADO to PC3 cells is due to the lack of substrates for DNA polymerization caused by irreversible inhibition of purine/pyrimidine ribo-and 2-deoxyribonucleotides salvage enzymes.

Modulation of the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor (GH-IGF) axis by pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and environmental xenobiotics: an emerging role for xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes and the transcription factors regulating their expression. A review

The growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor (GH-IGF) axis has gained considerable focus over recent years. One cause of this increased interest is due to a correlation of age-related decline in plasma GH/IGF levels with age-related degenerative processes, and it has led to the prescribing of GH replacement therapy by some practitioners. On the other hand, however, research has also focused on the pro-carcinogenic effects of high GH-IGF levels, providing strong impetus for finding regimes that reduce its activity. Whereas the effects of GH/IGF activity on the action of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzyme systems is reasonably well appreciated, the effects of xenobiotic exposure on the GH-IGF axis has not received substantial review. Relevant xenobiotics are derived from pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and environmental exposure, and many of the mechanisms involved are highly complex in nature, not easily predictable from existing in vitro tests and do not always predict well from in vivo animal models. After a review of the human and animal in vivo and in vitro literature, a framework for considering the different levels of direct and indirect modulation by xenobiotics is developed herein, and areas that still require further investigation are highlighted, i.e. the actions of common endocrine disruptors such as pesticides and phytoestrogens, as well as the role of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes and the transcription factors regulating their expression. It is anticipated that a fuller appreciation of the existing human paradigms for GH-IGF axis modulation gained through this review may help explain some of the variation in levels of plasma IGF-1 and its binding proteins in the population, aid in the prescription of particular dietary regimens to certain individuals such as those with particular medical conditions, guide the direction of long-term drug/nutraceutical safety trials, and stimulate ideas for future research. It also serves to warn athletes that using compounds touted as performance enhancing because they promote short-term GH release could in fact be detrimental to performance in the long-run.

Cell biology of the ghrelin receptor

Ghrelin, a gastric peptide involved in growth hormone release and energy homeostasis, is the endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a (GHS-R1a), a G-protein coupled receptor mainly expressed in the pituitary and hypothalamus. This receptor mediates the main ghrelin-stimulated endocrine actions and some of the nonendocrine actions. However, a number of nonendocrine actions associated with ghrelin appear to be mediated by various GHS-R1a-related receptor subtypes, which are widely distributed in the central and peripheral tissues. This review summarises data concerning the localisation, regulation and function of GHS-R1a, as well as related receptors.