Long-term follow-up after purine analogue therapy in hairy cell leukaemia

Detangling the Threads of Hairy Cell Leukemia, Beyond the Morphology and Into the Molecular

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) makes up 2% of leukemias in the United States and encompasses great molecular heterogeneity. The standard treatment paradigm involves purine nucleoside analogues in the upfront setting with high complete response rate to initial therapy but frequent relapses. There is an increasing role for BRAF inhibitors, with or without rituximab, in refractory and even in untreated patients. The response to purine analogues in HCL variant cases, otherwise classified as splenic lymphoma with prominent nucleolus in the 5th WHO edition classification, is less robust. Several antibodies, small molecular inhibitors, and combination regimens have been explored in HCL but data is frequently limited by case reports or small case series. Here we review available treatment options including their efficacy and safety profiles. We also explore investigational agents and potential future targets. The goal is to present a comprehensive therapeutic review of this rare disease entity and outline the ever increasing and novel therapeutic management options which interrupt key pathways in the pathogenesis of this malignancy.

Single agent vemurafenib or rituximab-vemurafenib combination for the treatment of relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia, a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B-cell malignancy that is primarily treated with purine analogues. However, relapse remains a significant challenge, prompting the search for alternative therapies. The BRAF V600E mutation prevalent in HCL patients provides a target for treatment with vemurafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included nine patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) HCL from six different centers. Patient data included demographics, prior treatments, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Patients received different treatment regimens between centers, including vemurafenib alone or in combination with rituximab. Despite the differences in protocols, all patients achieved at least a partial response, with seven patients achieving a complete response. Adverse events were generally mild with manageable side effects. The absence of myelotoxic effects and manageable side effects make BRAF inhibitors attractive, especially for patients ineligible for purine analogues or those with severe neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Single agent vemurafenib or in combination with rituximab appears to be a promising therapeutic option for R/R HCL. Further research is needed to establish standardized treatment protocols and to investigate long-term outcomes.

Hairy cell leukemia 2024: Update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment-Annual updates in hematological malignancies

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders, including HCL variant (HCL-V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL), are a very heterogenous group of mature lymphoid B-cell disorders characterized by the identification of hairy cells, a specific genetic profile, a different clinical course and the need for appropriate treatment.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of HCL is based on morphological evidence of hairy cells, an HCL immunologic score of 3 or 4 based on the CD11c, CD103, CD123, and CD25 expression, the trephine biopsy which makes it possible to specify the degree of tumoral bone marrow infiltration and the presence of BRAFV600E somatic mutation.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Progression of patients with HCL is based on a large splenomegaly, leukocytosis, a high number of hairy cells in the peripheral blood, and the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene mutational status. VH4-34 positive HCL cases are associated with a poor prognosis, as well as HCL with TP53 mutations and HCL-V.

TREATMENT

Patients should be treated only if HCL is symptomatic. Chemotherapy with risk-adapted therapy purine analogs (PNAs) are indicated in first-line HCL patients. The use of chemo-immunotherapy combining cladribine (CDA) and rituximab (R) represents an increasingly used therapeutic approach. Management of relapsed/refractory disease is based on the use of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) plus R, MEK inhibitors (MEKi), recombinant immunoconjugates targeting CD22, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), and Bcl-2 inhibitors (Bcl-2i). However, the optimal sequence of the different treatments remains to be determined.

Refractory and relapsed hairy-cell leukemia (HCL): casting light on promising experimental drugs in clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare subtype of indolent lymphoid leukemia originating from a mature B lymphocyte. The standard first-line treatment for classic HCL, and HCL variant (HCLv), consists of purine nucleoside analogs (PNA), with or without rituximab. However, almost half of patients relapse and require subsequent therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes recent achievements in the treatment of relapsed and refractory HCL. A literature search was conducted of the PubMed and MEDLINE database for articles in English. Publications from 2010 through January 2023 were scrutinized. The search terms used were hairy cell leukemia in conjunction with BRAF inhibitors, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, CD20 monoclonal antibodies, relapsed, refractory and variant.The growing understanding of HCL biology has allowed the design of several new, chemotherapy-free targeted drugs which have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in early clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel drugs will soon be available to assist standard therapy for HCL and HCLv among patients with suboptimal results following PNA treatment. In particular, the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib, with or without rituximab, have revolutionized treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive hairy cell leukemia

BRAF V600E is the key oncogenic driver mutation in hairy cell leukemia (HCL). We report the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL. This open-label, phase 2 study enrolled patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL refractory to first-line treatment with a purine analog or relapsed after ≥2 prior lines of treatment. Patients received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per criteria adapted from National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Consensus Resolution guidelines. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Fifty-five patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL were enrolled. The investigator-assessed ORR was 89.0% (95% confidence interval, 77.8%-95.9%); 65.5% of patients had a complete response (without minimal residual disease [MRD]: 9.1% [negative immunohistochemistry of bone marrow {BM} biopsy], 12.7% [negative BM aspirate flow cytometry {FC}], 16.4% [negative immunohistochemistry and/or FC results]; with MRD, 49.1%), and 23.6% had a partial response. The 24-month DOR was 97.7% with 24-month PFS and OS rates of 94.4% and 94.5%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (58.2%), chills (47.3%), and hyperglycemia (40.0%). Dabrafenib plus trametinib demonstrated durable responses with a manageable safety profile consistent with previous observations in other indications and should be considered as a rituximab-free therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02034110.

Long-term follow-up of patients with hairy cell leukemia in the south of Iran

BACKGROUND

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an indolent chronic lymphoproliferative disorder and first-line treatment with either intravenous or subcutaneous cladribine generally leads to long-lasting remissions.

METHOD

All 131 patients with hairy-cell leukemia (HCL) were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 91 months. Data is from 2007 to 2020. We evaluated the response rate to cladribine as the first line and the response rate to cladribine with or without rituximab in relapsed patients. Further, we assessed relapse-free survival, complications, and secondary malignancy.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 91 months, the recurrence rate was 24%. The 5-year and 10-year RFS rates were 85% and 66%, respectively. Adding rituximab to 2-CDA leads to a better response rate than just cladribine (90% vs. 27.3%, p-value = 0.002) in the relapsed patients.

CONCLUSION

HCL patients have long-term survival when cladribine is the first line of treatment. Furthermore, adding rituximab to cladribine leads to a higher response rate.

Consensus opinion from an international group of experts on measurable residual disease in hairy cell leukemia

A significant body of literature has been generated related to the detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the time of achieving complete remission (CR) in patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL). However, due to the indolent nature of the disease as well as reports suggesting long-term survival in patients treated with a single course of a nucleoside analog albeit without evidence of cure, the merits of detection of MRD and attempts to eradicate it have been debated. Studies utilizing novel strategies in the relapse setting have demonstrated the utility of achieving CR with undetectable MRD (uMRD) in prolonging the duration of remission. Several assays including immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow specimens, multi-parameter flow cytometry and molecular assays to detect the mutant BRAF V600E gene or the consensus primer for the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGH) rearrangement have been utilized with few comparative studies. Here we provide a consensus report on the available data, the potential merits of MRD assessment in the front-line and relapse settings and recommendations on future role of MRD assessment in HCL.

Retrospective Evaluation of Hairy Cell Leukemia Patients: Analysis of a Long-Term Single Center Data

Background: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a distinct lymphoproliferative disorder with unique circulating lymphocyte morphology. It is now regarded as an indolent disease yet treatable with purine analogs. We are going to present a complete long-term clinical and prognostic report of our HCL patients as a large cohort in Iran. Materials and Methods: All patients diagnosed with HCL, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, were enrolled in this study. They were referred to our academic center between 1995 and 2020. Treatment with a daily cladribine regimen was initiated as indicated and patients were followed. Survival data and clinical outcomes of patients were calculated. Results: A total of 50 patients were studied (76% male). The median time to treatment was 4.8 months and complete remission was achieved in 92% of patients. Nine patients (18%) experienced relapse with a median time to relapse of 47 months. After a median follow-up of 51 months, the median OS was not reached and after 234 months, the overall survival rate was 86%. Survival was worse in patients with non-classic HCL (vHCL) compared to classic HCL. Conclusion: Our long-term follow-up data confirmed the favorable outcomes of Iranian HCL patients with cladribine and provide a useful viewpoint of the disease.

How I treat refractory/relapsed hairy cell leukemia with BRAF inhibitors

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) responds very well to frontline chemotherapy with purine analogs (cladribine and pentostatine). However, approximately half of patients experience 1 or more relapses, which become progressively resistant to these myelotoxic and immunosuppressive agents. At progression, standard therapeutic options include a second course of purine analogs alone or in combination with rituximab and, upon second relapse, therapy with the anti-CD22 immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox. Furthermore, blockade of the mutant BRAF-V600E kinase (the pathogenetic hallmark of HCL) through orally available specific inhibitors (vemurafenib or dabrafenib) effaces the peculiar morphologic, phenotypic, and molecular identity of this disease and its typical antiapoptotic behavior and is emerging as an attractive chemotherapy-free strategy in various clinical scenarios. These include patients with, or at risk of, severe infections and, in a highly effective combination with rituximab, patients with relapsed or refractory HCL. Other treatments explored in clinical trials are BTK inhibition with ibrutinib and co-inhibition of BRAF (through dabrafenib or vemurafenib) and its downstream target MEK (through trametinib or cobimetinib). Here, we focus on our experience with BRAF inhibitors in clinical trials and as off-label use in routine practice by presenting 3 challenging clinical cases to illustrate their management in the context of all available treatment options.

Updates in hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and variant-type HCL (HCL-V): rationale for targeted treatments with a focus on ibrutinib

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders such as hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL) are rare indolent B-cell malignancies. Purine analogs (PNAs), alone or in association with rituximab (R), are the standard of care for HCL in the first-line setting. However, PNAs are toxic and patients may become resistant to these drugs. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed. Several recent in vitro studies highlighted the importance of the interactions between HCL cells and their microenvironment, in particular with bone marrow stromal cells, endothelial cells, and the extracellular matrix. In these interactions, chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules play a major role. Moreover, the importance of signaling pathways, like BRAF, BCR, and CXCR4 has been underlined. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a fundamental signal transmitter of BCR and CXCR4 in HCL. Preclinical and recent clinical data showed an efficacy of ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor (BTKi), in HCL and HCL-V. These promising results joined those of other emerging drugs like BRAF or MEK inhibitors and anti-CD22 immunotoxins.

Plain Language Summary

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKi) in hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and variant-type HCL The treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) has changed significantly in recent years. In the first-line settings, treatment with purine analogs (PNAs) with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies remains the gold standard in 2022. In relapsed/refractory HCL, other drugs are needed: BRAF inhibitors: vemurafenib monotherapy with or without rituximab or dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, an MEK inhibitor (MEKi), as well as the anti-CD22 antibody drug conjugate moxetumomab pasudotox. There are arguments for the use of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). Ibrutinib was recently tested in a multisite phase 2 study in 37 patients with either HCL (28 patients: 76%) or HCL-V (nine patients: 24%) including two who were previously untreated. Patients received single-agent ibrutinib at 420 mg daily (24 patients) or 840 mg daily (13 patients) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The overall response rate (ORR) at 32 weeks was 24%, increasing to 36% at 48 weeks and reaching 54% at any time since starting ibrutinib. Seven patients achieved a complete response (CR) as the best response at any time on study, while 13 patients had a partial response (PR) and 10 patients had stable disease (SD). Interestingly, the response rate was not statistically different between HCL and HCL-V patients, suggesting that ibrutinib could be an option in both entities. The estimated 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 73% and the estimated 36-month overall survival (OS) was 85%, with no differences between HCL and HCL-V. The frequency of cardiovascular grade 1–2 adverse events (AEs) was 16% for atrial fibrillation; 3% for atrial flutter; 32% for hypertension; and 0%, 3%, and 11%, respectively, for grade ⩾ 3 AEs. Unlike in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), where the mechanism of action of ibrutinib is well known, the mechanism of action of ibrutinib in HCL appears to be unclear. No mutations were identified in patients with progressive disease, suggesting that the mechanisms of resistance could be different between HCL and CLL. The BTKi that are not yet approved are challenged by the new other targeted treatments.

Hairy Cell Leukemia Patients Have a Normal Life Expectancy-A 35-Year Single-Center Experience and Comparison with the General Population

Classic hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an uncommon hematologic malignancy characterized by an excellent prognosis since purine analogues (PA), such as cladribine (2-CdA), have been introduced in the 1990s. However, most data on long-term outcomes is gathered from patients treated with PA first-line or include limited information on previous treatment outcomes, i.e., Interferon-α (IFN-α). Survival curves from previous series did not reach a plateau, indicating that nearly all patients ultimately relapse. Yet, overall survival (OS) data were rarely corrected for life expectancy of the general population. We here report 83 consecutive HCL patients treated between 1983 and 2017 at the University Center in Innsbruck, Austria. Median follow-up was 170 months (1-498). IFN-α, the first-line treatment of choice before 1990, was administered to 24 patients, achieving an overall response rate (ORR) of 86% and an unconfirmed complete remission (CRu) in 23%. All these patients relapsed after a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 30 months (3-80), but either remained drug-sensitive upon re-exposure to IFN-α or were successfully salvaged with PA. All 42 patients exposed to first-line 2-CdA responded (ORR of 100%). Sixteen patients received two to four successive courses of PA with a continuous decrease in the response quality (CRu rate 85.7% 1st-line vs. 41.5% 3rd-line treatment). Median PFS was not reached in both treatment-naïve patients and those retreated at first relapse. Although pretreatment with IFN-α was associated with a shortened median PFS of 81 months (43-118) after PA therapy, this tendency of inferior PFS did not result in inferior OS. OS of all 83 patients was excellent and equivalent to that of age-, sex-, and diagnostic period-matched controls from the Tyrolean general population (standardized mortality ratio 0.8), regardless of their age at diagnosis or whether they were diagnosed until or after the year 2000. These results confirm that HCL patients may look forward to a normal lifespan when treated with PA irrespective of their pretreatment history.

Treatment of Classic Hairy Cell Leukemia: Targeting Minimal Residual Disease beyond Cladribine

Simple Summary

Standard treatment with purine analogues facilitates a near normal life expectancy in the majority of patients with classic hairy cell leukemia (HCL), a rare chronic B-cell malignancy. However, nearly all patients ultimately relapse and require retreatment, while drug-induced myelotoxicity accumulates predisposing to infectious complications and, possibly, secondary malignancies. Persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) in a substantial portion of treated patients has become a surrogate for this still limited treatment efficacy. New insights into disease biology initiated design and investigation of several new, chemotherapy-free, targeted drugs with encouraging efficacy in early clinical trials aimed at enhancing eradication of MRD and optimizing drug tolerability. This review provides an update on recent clinical trials investigating treatment strategies beyond purine analogues in HCL and discusses clinically relevant obstacles still to overcome.

Abstract

Classic hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare indolent B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by profound pancytopenia and frequent infectious complications due to progressive infiltration of the bone marrow and spleen. Lacking effective treatment options, affected patients were confronted with a dismal survival prognosis of less than 5 years when the disease was first described in 1958. Tremendous therapeutic advances were accomplished with the introduction of purine analogues such as cladribine in the 1990s, facilitating a near-normal life expectancy in most HCL patients. Nevertheless, nearly all patients eventually relapse and require successive retreatments, while drug-associated myelotoxicity may accumulate and secondary malignancies may evolve. Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in a substantial portion of treated patients has become a surrogate for this still limited treatment efficacy. In the last decade, novel biologic insights such as identification of the driver mutation BRAF V600E have initiated the development and clinical investigation of new, chemotherapy-free, targeted drugs in HCL treatment, with encouraging efficacy in early clinical trials aimed at boosting eradication of MRD while optimizing drug tolerability. This review summarizes current clinical trials investigating treatment strategies beyond purine analogues in HCL and discusses clinically relevant obstacles still to overcome.

Hairy cell leukemia 2022: Update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders, including HCL variant (HCL-V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL), are a very heterogeneous group of mature lymphoid B-cell disorders characterized by the identification of hairy cells, a specific genetic profile, a different clinical course, and the need for appropriate treatment.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of HCL is based on morphological evidence of hairy cells, an HCL immunologic score of 3 or 4 based on the CD11C, CD103, CD123, and CD25 expression, the trephine biopsy which makes it possible to specify the degree of tumoral medullary infiltration and the presence of BRAF^V600E somatic mutation.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Progression of patients with HCL is based on a large splenomegaly, leukocytosis, a high number of hairy cells in the peripheral blood, and the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene mutational status. VH4-34-positive HCL cases are associated with a poor prognosis.

TREATMENT

Patients should be treated only if HCL is symptomatic. Chemotherapy with risk adapted therapy purine analogs (PNAs) are indicated in first-line HCL patients. The use of chemo-immunotherapy combining PNAs and rituximab (R) represents an increasingly used therapeutic approach. Management of relapsed/refractory disease is based on the use of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) plus rituximab or MEK inhibitors (MEKi), recombinant immunoconjugates targeting CD22 or Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi). However, the optimal sequence of the different treatments remains to be determined. The Bcl2-inhibitors (Bcl-2i) can play a major role in the future.

Diagnosis and treatment of hairy cell leukemia as the COVID-19 pandemic continues

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an indolent B-cell malignancy, usually driven by the BRAF V600E mutation. For 30 years, untreated and relapsed HCL was successfully treated with purine analogs, but minimal residual disease (MRD) remained in most patients, eventually causing relapse. Repeated purine analogs achieve decreasing efficacy and increasing toxicity, particularly to normal T-cells. MRD-free complete remissions (CRs) are more common using rituximab with purine analogs in both 1^st-line and relapsed settings. BRAF inhibitors and Ibrutinib can achieve remission, but due to persistence of MRD, must be used chronically to prevent relapse. BRAF inhibition combined with Rituximab can achieve high MRD-free CR rates. Anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox is FDA-approved in the relapsed setting and is unique in achieving high MRD-free CR rates as a single-agent. Avoiding chemotherapy and rituximab may be important in ensuring both recovery from COVID-19 and successful COVID-19 vaccination, an area of continued investigation.

How to Diagnose and Treat CD5-Positive Lymphomas Involving the Spleen

Patients with CD5-expressing lymphomas presenting with splenomegaly are frequently diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The most important differential diagnosis is mantle cell lymphoma, both in its classical and leukemic, non-nodal forms, given its prognostic and therapeutic implications. Other small B-cell neoplasms that frequently involve the spleen and occasionally express CD5 include the splenic marginal zone lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia and, rarely, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. The frequency of CD5 positivity depends in part on the sensitivity of the detection methods employed. Usually, a combination of morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular findings allows for a precise sub-classification of CD5-positive, low-grade B-cell lymphomas of the spleen. Some of these tumors may display a mixture of small and larger B cells, raising the possibility of more aggressive lymphomas, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Approximately 5-10% of DLBCL are CD5-positive and some may manifest as primary splenic lesions. When available, the morphology of DLBCL in the splenic tissue is distinctive and a leukemic picture is very rare. In conclusion, the appropriate morphological and clinical context assisted by flow cytometry panels and/or immunohistochemistry allows the differential diagnosis of CD5-positive, non-Hodgkin, B-cell lymphomas involving the spleen.

The treatment of hairy cell leukemia with a focus on long lasting responses to cladribine: A 30-year experience

The treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) has considerably changed over years. Purine analogues, namely cladribine, now represent the treatment of choice. One hundred and eighty-four patients were followed between 1986 and 2018 and treated according to era-specific guidelines. Responses were classified by combining Consensus Resolution criteria and marrow immunohistochemistry. Patients were grouped according to the number of treatment lines they received. Patients treated first line responded in 86% of cases, with complete response (CR) in 44% of cases. Response rates remained high throughout the first four lines (84%, 81%, 79% for the second line onward, with CR in 38%, 37%, 15% of cases respectively). One hundred and twenty-two patients received cladribine as first line treatment, with a response rate of 86% and a CR rate of 54%. Among the 66 CR patients, 45 (68%) have never received further therapy: 11 patients are in continuous CR between 5 and 10 years after treatment, 14 between 10 and 20 years and three patients at more than 20 years. Median time-to-next treatment (TTNT) for frontline cladribine-treated patients was 8.2 years: partial responders had a significantly shorter median TTNT than CR patients (5.3 years vs median not reached at 25.8 years, p < 0.001). Patients with HCL require subsequent lines of therapy in more than 50% of cases. Purine analogues allow significant response rates when applied first line and upon retreatment. Some patients may enjoy long lasting treatment-free intervals after one course of cladribine.

Hairy cell leukemia: a brief update on current knowledge and treatment prospects

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides a brief update on the recommended diagnosis and treatment strategies for patients with the classic form of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL variant (HCLv).

RECENT FINDINGS

HCL is a chronic B-cell malignancy with multiple treatment options. In recent years, many novel drugs have been assessed for HCL treatment with promising results. The investigated nonchemotherapy options include moxetumomab pasudotox, which targets CD22; vemurafenib or dabrafenib, which target the BRAFV600E protein; trametinib, which targets mitogen-activated protein kinase enzyme; and ibrutinib, which targets Bruton tyrosine kinase.

SUMMARY

Purine analogs significantly improve survival in patients with HCL. However, patients often relapse, require multiple treatments, and may become refractory. The introduction of novel agents has expanded the spectrum of therapy possibilities in those patients. In the coming years, they will assist standard therapy for patients with HCL who may currently have suboptimal results.

The Biology of Classic Hairy Cell Leukemia

Classic hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B-cell malignancy associated with pancytopenia and infectious complications due to progressive infiltration of the bone marrow and spleen. Despite tremendous therapeutic advances achieved with the implementation of purine analogues such as cladribine into clinical practice, the culprit biologic alterations driving this fascinating hematologic disease have long stayed concealed. Nearly 10 years ago, BRAF V600E was finally identified as a key activating mutation detectable in almost all HCL patients and throughout the entire course of the disease. However, additional oncogenic biologic features seem mandatory to enable HCL transformation, an open issue still under active investigation. This review summarizes the current understanding of key pathogenic mechanisms implicated in HCL and discusses major hurdles to overcome in the context of other BRAF-mutated malignancies.

Patients with relapsed/refractory hairy-cell leukemia

Background

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare chronic B‐cell neoplasm with good long‐term prognosis. First and second‐line therapies include purine nucleoside analogues (PNAs) and rituximab, but until recently, limited alternative options were available for patients with two or more relapses.

Aim

The aim of this study is to describe our real‐life experience with HCL patients in third and fourth‐line therapies.

Methods and Results

Data from 49 HCL patients with two or more relapses, including 16 patients with three or more relapses, were collected from the French retrospective HCL cohort covering the period from 1980 until 2011. They were analyzed to assess hematological response, relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after third (L3) and fourth line (L4). The median age at diagnosis was 53 years. PNAs were the most frequently used treatments. As L3 therapy, 29 patients received PNAs (66%) and 15 (34%) other treatments (rituximab [11%] or interferon [7%] alone or in combination [16%]). The distribution of L4 treatments was similar. The overall hematological response rate (OHRR) after L3 was 97% (complete hematological response 86%) with a 40% five‐year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), a median RFS of 104 months, and a median OS of 235 months. After L4, the OHRR was 94% with a two‐year CIR of fourth relapse of 27%. Eleven secondary cancers (5‐year cumulative incidence of 12%) were diagnosed in 10 patients. Patients with ≥2 relapses experience frequent further relapses, with increasingly shorter time to next treatment as the number of treatment lines increases. Furthermore, treatment strategies are associated with substantial toxicities.

Conclusion

All these points lead to the need for novel treatments.

Management of Relapsed Hairy Cell Leukemia: A Systematic Review of Novel Agents and Targeted Therapies

BACKGROUND

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) responds well to purine analogs with an overall median relapse free survival of 11-16 years. Most patients can be retreated with the same or a different purine analog however a subset of patients will become resistant or develop cumulative toxicities. Novel agents such as Vemurafenib (BRAF kinase inhibitor), Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR), Moxetumomab pasudotox (anti CD-22 recombinant immunotoxin) and Ibrutinib have emerging roles in patients with relapsed HCL.

METHODS

Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched using the following search terms: "hairy cell leukemia" or "leukemia, hairy cell" AND "relapse" or "recurrence". We included only prospective clinical trials with outcome data.

RESULTS

Vemurafenib monotherapy was evaluated in two separate arms of a phase 2 trial. In the US arm (n=24), the ORR was 100% (CR 42%; PR 58%). In the Italian arm (n=26), the ORR was 96% (CR 35%; PR 62%). In a phase 2 study (n=25), the combination of vemurafenib and rituximab showed CR of 100%. The combination of BR achieved an ORR of 100% whereas CR was 50% and 67% at a bendamustine dose of 70mg/m² (n=6) and 90 mg/m² (n=6) respectively. In a phase 3 trial, moxetumomab pasudotox (n=80) had an ORR of 75% (CR 41%). Single agent Ibrutinib (n=37) had an ORR of 54%. Therapies were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Novel agents have good efficacy in HCL in patients with multiple relapses.

[Hairy cell leukemia: What are the best treatment options for relapsed or refractory patients?]

Hairy cell leukemia is a rare form of leukemia: three hundred new cases are diagnosed each year in France. The diagnosis is based on: (1) morphological examination of the blood and bone marrow smear, (2) analysis by flow cytometry of hairy cells, which express three or the four following markers: CD11c, CD25, CD103 and CD123, (3) identification of the BRAF^V600E mutation, a true molecular marker of the disease. The management of treatment has evolved considerably in recent years. As of today, the purine analogues remain the standard treatment in the first line. Relapses are however observed in about 40% of cases. In the event of a first relapse, the preferred option is treatment with immunochemotherapy i.e. a combination of cladribine plus rituximab. Subsequent relapses are treated with moxetumomab pasudotox or BRAF inhibitors which provide indisputable benefits if third-line treatment is required. We will discuss in patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia the needs for personalized medicine and the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment modality. The good prognosis for LT requires treatments that are not immunosuppressive, non-myelotoxic, and do not increase the risk of secondary cancers.

Vemurafenib plus Rituximab in Refractory or Relapsed Hairy-Cell Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Hairy-cell leukemia (HCL) is a CD20+ indolent B-cell cancer in which a BRAF V600E kinase-activating mutation plays a pathogenetic role. In clinical trials involving patients with refractory or relapsed HCL, the targeting of BRAF V600E with the oral BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib led to a response in 91% of the patients; 35% of the patients had a complete response. However, the median relapse-free survival was only 9 months after treatment was stopped.

METHODS

In a phase 2, single-center, academic trial involving patients with refractory or relapsed HCL, we assessed the safety and efficacy of vemurafenib (960 mg, administered twice daily for 8 weeks) plus concurrent and sequential rituximab (375 mg per square meter of body-surface area, administered for 8 doses over a period of 18 weeks). The primary end point was a complete response at the end of planned treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 30 enrolled patients with HCL, the median number of previous therapies was 3. A complete response was observed in 26 patients (87%) in the intention-to-treat population. All the patients who had HCL that had been refractory to chemotherapy (10 patients) or rituximab (5) and all those who had previously been treated with BRAF inhibitors (7) had a complete response. Thrombocytopenia resolved after a median of 2 weeks, and neutropenia after a median of 4 weeks. Of the 26 patients with a complete response, 17 (65%) were cleared of minimal residual disease (MRD). Progression-free survival among all 30 patients was 78% at a median follow-up of 37 months; relapse-free survival among the 26 patients with a response was 85% at a median follow-up of 34 months. In post hoc analyses, MRD negativity and no previous BRAF inhibitor treatment correlated with longer relapse-free survival. Toxic effects, mostly of grade 1 or 2, were those that had previously been noted for these agents.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study, a short, chemotherapy-free, nonmyelotoxic regimen of vemurafenib plus rituximab was associated with a durable complete response in most patients with refractory or relapsed HCL. (Funded by the European Research Council and others; HCL-PG03 EudraCT number, 2014-003046-27.).

MAP-Kinase-Driven Hematopoietic Neoplasms: A Decade of Progress in the Molecular Age

Mutations in members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway are extensively studied in epithelial malignancies, with BRAF mutations being one of the most common alterations activating this pathway. However, BRAF mutations are overall quite rare in hematological malignancies. Studies over the past decade have identified high-frequency BRAF V600E, MAP2K1, and other kinase alterations in two groups of MAPK-driven hematopoietic neoplasms: hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and the systemic histiocytoses. Despite HCL and histiocytoses sharing common molecular alterations, these are phenotypically distinct malignancies that differ in respect to clinical presentation and suspected cell of origin. The purpose of this review is to highlight the molecular advancements over the last decade in the histiocytic neoplasms and HCL and discuss the impact these insights have had on our understanding of the molecular pathophysiology, cellular origins, and therapy of these enigmatic diseases as well as perspectives for future research directions.

Moxetumomab pasudotox in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL): long-term follow-up from the pivotal trial

Background

Moxetumomab pasudotox is a recombinant CD22-targeting immunotoxin. Here, we present the long-term follow-up analysis of the pivotal, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT01829711) of moxetumomab pasudotox in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hairy cell leukemia (HCL).

Methods

Eligible patients had received ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies, including ≥ 2 purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs), or ≥ 1 PNA followed by rituximab or a BRAF inhibitor. Patients received 40 µg/kg moxetumomab pasudotox intravenously on Days 1, 3, and 5 of each 28-day cycle for up to six cycles. Disease response and minimal residual disease (MRD) status were determined by blinded independent central review. The primary endpoint was durable complete response (CR), defined as achieving CR with hematologic remission (HR, blood counts for CR) lasting > 180 days.

Results

Eighty adult patients were treated with moxetumomab pasudotox and 63% completed six cycles. Patients had received a median of three lines of prior systemic therapy; 49% were PNA-refractory, and 38% were unfit for PNA retreatment. At a median follow-up of 24.6 months, the durable CR rate (CR with HR > 180 days) was 36% (29 patients; 95% confidence interval: 26–48%); CR with HR ≥ 360 days was 33%, and overall CR was 41%. Twenty-seven complete responders (82%) were MRD-negative (34% of all patients). CR lasting ≥ 60 months was 61%, and the median progression-free survival without the loss of HR was 71.7 months. Hemolytic uremic and capillary leak syndromes were each reported in ≤ 10% of patients, and ≤ 5% had grade 3–4 events; these events were generally reversible. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions

Moxetumomab pasudotox resulted in a high rate of durable responses and MRD negativity in heavily pre-treated patients with HCL, with a manageable safety profile. Thus, it represents a new and viable treatment option for patients with R/R HCL, who currently lack adequate therapy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01829711; first submitted: April 9, 2013. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01829711

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13045-020-01004-y.

Moxetumomab pasudotox for hairy cell leukemia: preclinical development to FDA approval

Moxetumomab pasudotox (MP) is an immunotoxin that recently received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) that has failed at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including a purine analog. MP is a recombinant immunotoxin that consists of an anti-CD22 immunoglobulin variable domain genetically joined to Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE38). Unlike most antibody-drug conjugates, which use a chemical linker, recombinant DNA techniques are used to produce MP. MP and its predecessor, BL22, were initially developed to treat non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and HCL. However, MP was found to be particularly effective in HCL due to the high level of CD22 cell-surface expression. The recent pivotal phase 3 trial of MP in relapsed/refractory HCL demonstrated a durable complete remission rate of 30%, and 85% of complete responders achieved minimal residual disease negativity, which is associated with improved disease-free survival outcomes in HCL. In addition to an exceptional depth of response, MP appears to be less immunosuppressive than purine analogs. MP is generally well tolerated but has unique toxicities, including capillary leak syndrome and hemolytic uremic syndrome, which are poorly understood. This review will encompass the preclinical and clinical development of MP, with particular attention to its current indication in HCL.

Moxetumomab Pasudotox: Clinical Experience in Relapsed/Refractory Hairy Cell Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Moxetumomab pasudotox is a promising new therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia (R/R HCL), but practical guidance relating to its administration is limited.

OBJECTIVES

This article describes clinical guidelines for the administration of moxetumomab pasudotox to patients with R/R HCL and presents related case studies.

METHODS

A limited review of the literature on HCL was undertaken.

FINDINGS

Nursing care of patients prescribed moxetumomab pasudotox includes monitoring clinical and laboratory parameters, managing side effects, being aware of signs of serious side effects, and maintaining patient hydration during administration.

Analysis of a cohort of 279 patients with hairy-cell leukemia (HCL): 10 years of follow-up

In total, 279 patients with hairy-cell leukemia (HCL) were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 10 years. Data were collected up to June 2018. We analyzed responses to treatment, relapses, survival, and the occurrence of second malignancies during follow-up. The median age was 59 years. In total, 208 patients (75%) were treated with purine analogs (PNAs), either cladribine (159) or pentosatin (49), as the first-line therapy. After a median follow-up of 127 months, the median overall survival was 27 years, and the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 11 years. The cumulative 10-year relapse incidence was 39%. In patients receiving second-line therapy, the median RFS was 7 years. For the second-line therapy, using the same or another PNA was equivalent. We identified 68 second malignancies in 59 patients: 49 solid cancers and 19 hematological malignancies. The 10-year cumulative incidences of cancers, solid tumors, and hematological malignancies were 15%, 11%, and 5.0%, respectively, and the standardized incidence ratios were 2.22, 1.81, and 6.67, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PNA was not a risk factor for second malignancies. HCL patients have a good long-term prognosis. PNAs are the first-line treatment. HCL patients require long-term follow-up because of their relatively increased risk of second malignancies.

Hairy Cell Leukaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarise diagnostic clinical/laboratory findings and highlight differences between classical hairy cell leukaemia (HCLc) and hairy cell leukaemia variant (HCLv). Discussion of prognosis and current treatment indications including novel therapies, linked to understanding of the underlying molecular pathogenesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of HCLc, particularly the causative mutation BRAF V600E, leading to constitutive activation of the MEK/ERK signalling pathway and increased cell proliferation. HCLc is caused by BRAF V600E mutation in most cases. Purine nucleoside analogue (PNA) therapy is the mainstay of treatment, with the addition of rituximab, improving response and minimal residual disease (MRD) clearance. Despite excellent responses to PNAs, many patients will eventually relapse, requiring further therapy. Rarely, patients are refractory to PNA therapy. In relapsed/refractory patients, novel targeted therapies include BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), anti-CD22 immunoconjugate moxetumomab and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). HCLv has a worse prognosis with median overall survival (OS), only 7-9 years, despite the combination of PNA/rituximab improving front-line response. Moxetumomab or ibrutinib may be a viable treatment but lacks substantial evidence.

Randomized Phase II Study of First-Line Cladribine With Concurrent or Delayed Rituximab in Patients With Hairy Cell Leukemia

PURPOSE

Single-agent purine analog, usually cladribine, has been the standard first-line therapy of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) for 30 years. High complete remission (CR) rates often include minimal residual disease (MRD), leading to relapse and repeated treatments. Rituximab can clear MRD, but long-term results are unknown and optimal timing of rituximab undefined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to first-line cladribine 0.15 mg/kg intravenously days 1-5 with 8 weekly doses of rituximab 375 mg/m² begun either day 1 (concurrent, CDAR) or ≥ 6 months later (delayed) after detection of MRD in blood. MRD tests included blood and bone marrow (BM) flow cytometry, and BM immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients with purine analog-naïve classic HCL were randomly assigned 1:1 to concurrent versus delayed arms. At 6 months after CDAR versus cladribine monotherapy, CR rates were 100% versus 88% (P = .11), MRD-free CR rates 97% versus 24% (P < .0001, primary end point), and blood MRD-free rates 100% versus 50% (P < .0001), respectively. At 96 months median follow-up, 94% versus 12% remained MRD free. Compared with CDAR, delayed rituximab after cladribine achieved lower rate (67% of 21 evaluable patients; P = .0034) and durability (P = .0081, hazard radio favoring CDAR, 0.094) of MRD-free CR. Nevertheless, 12 patients in the delayed arm remained MRD free when restaged 6-104 (median, 78) months after last delayed rituximab treatment. Compared with cladribine monotherapy, CDAR led to brief grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (59% v 9%; P < .0001) and platelet transfusions without bleeding (35% v 0%; P = .0002), but higher neutrophil (P = .017) and platelet (P = .0015) counts at 4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Achieving MRD-free CR of HCL after first-line cladribine is greatly enhanced by concurrent rituximab and less so by delayed rituximab. Longer follow-up will determine if MRD-free survival leads to less need for additional therapy or cure of HCL.

Adverse event rates and economic burden associated with purine nucleoside analogs in patients with hairy cell leukemia: a US population-retrospective claims analysis

Background

Purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs) are the recommended first-line treatment for patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL), but they are associated with adverse events (AEs). Due to a lack of real-world evidence regarding AEs that are associated with PNAs, we used commercial data to assess AE rates, AE-related health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among PNA-treated patients with HCL. Adults aged ≥18 years with ≥2 claims for HCL ≥30 days apart from 1 January 2006 through 31 December 2015 were included. Included patients had ≥1 claim for HCL therapy (cladribine ± rituximab or pentostatin ± rituximab [index date: first claim date]) and continuous enrollment for a ≥ 6-month baseline and ≥ 12-month follow-up period. Patient sub-cohorts were based on the occurrence of myelosuppression and opportunistic infections (OIs). Generalized linear models were used to compare HCRU and costs.

Results

In total, 647 PNA-treated patients were identified (mean age: 57.1 years). Myelosuppression and OI incidence were 461 and 42 per 1000 patient-years, respectively. Adjusted results indicated that those with myelosuppression had higher rates of hospitalization (47.4% vs 12.4%; P < .0001) and incurred higher mean inpatient costs ($23,517 vs $12,729; P = .011) and total costs ($57,325 vs $34,733; P = .001) as compared with those without myelosuppression. Similarly, patients with OIs had higher rates of hospitalization (53.8% vs 30.8%; P = .025) and incurred higher mean inpatient costs ($21,494 vs $11,229; P < .0001) as compared with those without OIs.

Conclusions

PNA therapy is highly effective but associated with significant toxicities that increase costs; these findings indicate a need for therapies with improved toxicity profiles and better risk stratification of patients at risk of developing myelosuppression and OIs.

Hairy cell leukemia: present and future directions

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an indolent B-cell malignancy, with long-term responses to purine analogs, but with decreasing efficacy and increasing toxicity with repeated courses. Leukemic cells express CD22, CD20, CD25, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), annexin 1A (Anxa1), and BRAF V600E mutation. HCLv, lacking CD25, Anxa1, TRAP, and BRAF V600E, is more aggressive and less purine analog-sensitive. A molecularly defined IGHV4-34+ variant is also resistant whether HCL or HCLv immunophenotypically. Traces of HCL cells, termed minimal residual disease (MRD), accompany most with complete remission (CR) and may cause relapse. Rituximab has limited single-agent activity, but frequent CR without MRD when combined with purine analog, albeit with chemotherapy toxicities. The anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin Moxetumomab Pasudotox can achieve MRD-negative CR in multiply relapsed HCL without chemotherapy toxicities and was FDA approved in 2018 as Lumoxiti. Investigational oral non-chemotherapy options also include Vemurafenib or Dabrafenib/Trametinib targeting BRAF V600E ± MEK, and Ibrutinib targeting Bruton's tyrosine kinase.

Hairy cell leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders, including HCL variant (HCL-V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL), are a very heterogeneous group of mature lymphoid B-cell disorders. They are characterized by the identification of hairy cells, a specific genetic profile, a different clinical course and the need for appropriate treatment.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of HCL is based on morphological evidence of hairy cells, an HCL immunologic score of three or four based on the CD11C, CD103, CD123, and CD25 expression. Also, the trephine biopsy which makes it possible to specify the degree of tumoral medullary infiltration and the presence of BRAF V600E somatic mutation.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Progression of patients with HCL is based on a large splenomegaly, leukocytosis, a high number of hairy cells in the peripheral blood and the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene mutational status. The VH4-34 positive HCL cases are associated with poor prognosis.

TREATMENT

Risk adapted therapy with purine nucleoside analogs (PNA) are indicated in symptomatic first line HCL patients. The use of PNA followed by rituximab represents an alternative option. Management of progressive or refractory disease is based on the use of BRAF inhibitors associated or not with MEK inhibitors, recombinant immunoconjugates targeting CD22 or BCR inhibitors.

New treatment options in hairy cell leukemia with focus on BRAF inhibitors

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) responds initially very well to chemotherapy with purine analogues. However, up to 50% of patients relapse, often multiple times, and become progressively less sensitive to these myelotoxic and immune-suppressive drugs. At progression, viable therapeutic strategies include addition of rituximab to purine analogues, and treatment with the anti-CD22 immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox, which has been recently approved by the FDA in HCL patients after at least two prior therapies. Identification of the BRAF-V600E kinase mutation as the genetic cause of HCL has opened the way, in the relapsed/refractory experimental setting, to targeted and non-myelotoxic effective strategies that are based on inhibition of BRAF with vemurafenib, co-inhibition of BRAF and its target MEK with dabrafenib and trametinib, and BRAF inhibition with vemurafenib combined with anti-CD20 immunotherapy. In particular, vemurafenib plus rituximab is emerging as a short, safe, chemotherapy-free regimen able to induce deep complete remissions in most HCL patients refractory to, or relapsed multiple times, after chemo(immuno)therapy.

Moxetumomab pasudotox for the treatment of hairy cell leukemia

Introduction: Cladribine and pentostatin are the drugs of choice in the treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL). Recently, immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox has been introduced to improve the prognosis in relapsed and refractory HCL. Areas covered: This review discusses the mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of moxetumomab pasudotox in HCL patients. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles in English concerning immunotoxins, moxetumomab pasudotox, and hairy cell leukemia was conducted via PubMed. Publications from 2000 through December 2018 were scrutinized. The search terms used were immunotoxins and moxetumomab pasudotox in conjunction with hairy cell leukemia. Conference proceedings from the previous five years of the American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association and American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles. Results/conclusion: Moxetumomab pasudotox, a novel recombinant anti-CD22 immunotoxin, was well tolerated and active in the previous phase 1 and 3 studies in patients with HCL. The drug has been approved in 2018 by the FDA for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory HCL who had at least two prior systemic therapies including at least one purine nucleoside analog. Expert opinion: The use of moxetumomab pasudotox is a promising new strategy for the treatment of HCL.

Moxetumomab pasudotox: A first-in-class treatment for hairy cell leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia is a rare indolent B-cell lymphoid malignancy. Durable remission can be obtained with purine analogues, but relapse is inevitable, and effective treatment options may be limited. Moxetumomab pasudotox is a recombinant CD22-targeting immunotoxin that has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia. Approval was based on a pivotal phase III study in this unique patient population. Rationale for use, clinical trial data, and current treatment recommendations are detailed. Common adverse effects are reviewed, and management strategies for select adverse effects are suggested. Implications for contemporary practitioners are also provided, as use of this novel agent is likely to increase as follow-up studies are reported.

Comparison of methodologies for the detection of BRAF mutations in bone marrow trephine specimens

Aims

BRAF V600E detection assists in the diagnosis of hairy cell leukaemia (HCL); however, testing practices vary. We evaluated the clinical utility of 5 BRAF mutation testing strategies for use on bone marrow trephines (BMT).

Methods

11 HCL, 5 HCL ‘mimic’, 2 treated HCL and 10 normal BMT specimens were tested for mutant BRAF, comparing Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, amplicon-based next generation sequencing (NGS), automated (Idylla) PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results

PCR and IHC were cheaper and identified V600E in 100 % of HCL cases. Pyrosequencing detected the mutation in 91%, NGS in 55% of cases and Sanger sequencing in 27%. All assays gave wild-type BRAF results in HCL mimics and normal BMT samples.

Conclusions

PCR and IHC were most sensitive and cost-effective, but these have limited scope for multiplexing and are likely to be replaced by NGS gene panels or whole genome sequencing in the medium to long term.

Recent advances in understanding and managing hairy cell leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia is a rare B-cell malignancy that is characterized by an indolent course. It was initially described as a distinct entity in 1958. Before the establishment of modern treatment, median survival was only 4 years. Since then, major advances in the treatment and understanding of the biology and genomic landscape of hairy cell leukemia have been made. This review summarizes the present understanding of hairy cell leukemia with particular focus on the development of novel and targeted approaches to treatment.

Update on hairy cell leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a chronic B-cell malignancy with multiple treatment options, including several that are investigational. Patients present with pancytopenia and splenomegaly, owing to the infiltration of leukemic cells expressing CD22, CD25, CD20, CD103, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), annexin A1 (ANXA1), and the BRAF V600E mutation. A variant lacking CD25, ANXA1, TRAP, and the BRAF V600E mutation, called HCLv, is more aggressive and is classified as a separate disease. A molecularly defined variant expressing unmutated immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-34 (IGHV4-34) is also aggressive, lacks the BRAF V600E mutation, and has a phenotype of HCL or HCLv. The standard first-line treatment, which has remained unchanged for the past 25 to 30 years, is single-agent therapy with a purine analogue, either cladribine or pentostatin. This approach produces a high rate of complete remission. Residual traces of HCL cells, referred to as minimal residual disease, are present in most patients and cause frequent relapse. Repeated treatment with a purine analogue can restore remission, but at decreasing rates and with increasing cumulative toxicity. Rituximab has limited activity as a single agent but achieves high complete remission rates without minimal residual disease when combined with purine analogues, albeit with chemotherapy-associated toxicity. Investigational nonchemotherapy options include moxetumomab pasudotox, which targets CD22; vemurafenib or dabrafenib, each of which targets the BRAF V600E protein; trametinib, which targets mitogen-activated protein kinase enzyme (MEK); and ibrutinib, which targets Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK).

Hairy cell leukemia 2018: Update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment

Disease overview

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL‐like disorders, including HCL variant (HCL‐V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL), are a very heterogeneous group of mature lymphoid B‐cell disorders, characterized by the identification of hairy cells, a specific genetic profile, a different clinical course and the need for appropriate treatment.

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of HCL is based on morphological evidence of hairy cells, an HCL immunologic score of 3 or 4 based on the CD11C, CD103, CD123, and CD25 expression, the trephine biopsy which makes it possible to specify the degree of tumoral medullary infiltration and the presence of BRAF V600E somatic mutation.

Risk stratification

Progression of patients with HCL is based on a large splenomegaly, leukocytosis, a high number of hairy cells in the peripheral blood and the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene mutational status. VH4‐34 positive HCL cases are associated with poor prognosis

Risk adapted therapy

Purine analogs (PNA) are indicated in symptomatic first line HCL patients. The use of PNA followed by rituximab represents an alternative option.

Management of progressive or refractory disease

It is based on the use of BRAF inhibitors associated or not with MEK inhibitors, recombinant immunoconjugates targeting CD22 or BCR inhibitors.

Morphologic Confounders and CD19 Negativity in a Case of Hairy Cell Leukemia

OBJECTIVES

We report a case of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) initially misdiagnosed as plasma cell dyscrasia due to various clinical, morphological and immunophenotypic confounders.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a patient diagnosed of marrow plasmacytosis and serum monoclonal protein elsewhere and referred to our hospital, morphological evaluation of bone marrow aspirate smears and trephine biopsy, immunophenotyping, and molecular testing (BRAFV600E mutation) were done. Clinically, the patient was asymptomatic; bone marrow revealed plasmacytosis, mastocytosis, and lymphocytosis with a few "hairy" cells. Immunophenotyping showed features of HCL with aberrant CD10 expression and a large subclone of CD19^neg cells. A diagnosis of HCL with reactive plasmacytosis and mast cell hyperplasia was made and confirmed by immunophenotyping and molecular studies.

CONCLUSION

Hematopathologists must be aware of various confounding factors and should judiciously use flow cytometric and molecular studies for attaining a proper diagnosis of HCL. We also report a very rare immunophenotypic aberrancy (CD 19 negativity) in HCL.

Genomics of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a chronic mature B-cell neoplasm with unique clinicopathologic features and an initial exquisite sensitivity to chemotherapy with purine analogs; however, the disease relapses, often repeatedly. The enigmatic pathogenesis of HCL was recently clarified by the discovery of its underlying genetic cause, the BRAF-V600E kinase-activating mutation, which is somatically and clonally present in almost all patients through the entire disease spectrum and clinical course. By aberrantly activating the RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway, BRAF-V600E shapes key biologic features of HCL, including its specific expression signature, hairy morphology, and antiapoptotic behavior. Accompanying mutations of the KLF2 transcription factor or the CDKN1B/p27 cell cycle inhibitor are recurrent in 16% of patients with HCL and likely cooperate with BRAF-V600E in HCL pathogenesis. Conversely, BRAF-V600E is absent in other B-cell neoplasms, including mimickers of HCL that require different treatments (eg, HCL-variant and splenic marginal zone lymphoma). Thus, testing for BRAF-V600E allows for a genetics-based differential diagnosis between HCL and HCL-like tumors, even noninvasively in routine blood samples. BRAF-V600E also represents a new therapeutic target. Patients' leukemic cells exposed ex vivo to BRAF inhibitors are spoiled of their HCL identity and then undergo apoptosis. In clinical trials of patients with HCL who have experienced multiple relapses after purine analogs or who are refractory to purine analogs, a short course of the oral BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib produced an almost 100% response rate, including complete remission rates of 35% to 42%, without myelotoxicity. To further improve on these results, it will be important to clarify the mechanisms of incomplete leukemic cell eradication by vemurafenib and to explore chemotherapy-free combinations of a BRAF inhibitor with other targeted agents (eg, a MEK inhibitor and/or an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody).

The Droplet Digital PCR: A New Valid Molecular Approach for the Assessment of B-RAF V600E Mutation in Hairy Cell Leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a chronic lymphoproliferative B-cell disorder where the B-RAF V600E mutation has been recently detected, as reported for solid neoplasias but not for other B-cell lymphomas. The digital droplet PCR (dd-PCR) is a molecular technique that, without standard references, is able to accurately quantitate DNA mutations. ddPCR could be an useful instrument for the detection of the B-RAF V600E mutation in HCL, where the minimal residual disease monitoring is fundamental for planning a patients-targeted treatment in the era of new anti-CD20 and anti-RAF compounds. This retrospective study enrolled 47 patients observed at the Hematology Unit of the University of Pisa, Italy, from January 2005 to January 2014: 27 patients were affected by “classic” HCL, two by the variant HCL (vHCL), and 18 by splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL). The aim of the study was to compare dd-PCR to “classic” quantitative PCR (QT-PCR) in terms of sensitivity and specificity and to demonstrate its possible use in HCL. Results showed that: (1) the sensitivity of dd-PCR is about half a logarithm superior to QT-PCR (5 × 10^-5 vs. 2.5 × 10^-4), (2) the specificity of the dd-PCR is comparable to QT-PCR (no patient with marginal splenic lymphoma or HCL variant resulted mutated), (3) its high sensitivity would allow to use dd-PCR in the monitoring of MRD. At the end of treatment, among patients in complete remission, 33% were still MRD-positive by dd-PCR versus 28% by QT-PCR versus 11% by the evaluation of the B-cell clonality, after 12 months, dd-PCR was comparable to QT-PCR and both detected the B-RAF mutation in 15% of cases defined as MRD-negative by IgH rearrangement. Moreover, (4) the feasibility and the costs of dd-PCR are comparable to those of QT-PCR. In conclusion, our study supports the introduction of dd-PCR in the scenario of HCL, also during the follow-up.

Long-term durable remission by cladribine followed by rituximab in patients with hairy cell leukaemia: update of a phase II trial

Nucleoside analogues are highly active in patients with hairy cell leukaemia (HCL); however, patients continue to relapse. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cladribine followed by rituximab in patients with untreated HCL (N = 59), relapsed HCL (N = 14) and HCL variant (HCLv, N = 7). Cladribine 5·6 mg/m(2) was given intravenously (IV) daily for 5 d and was followed approximately 1 month later with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) IV weekly for 8 weeks. Complete response rate in patients with untreated HCL, relapsed HCL and HCLv was 100%, 100% and 86%, respectively. With a median follow up of 60 months, 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) in patients with untreated HCL, relapsed HCL and HCLv was 95%, 100% and 64%, respectively. Median duration of response to the cladribine followed by rituximab was significantly longer than the first-line cladribine single agent in patients who received this treatment as second-line treatment (72 months vs not reached, P = 0·004). Almost all patients (94%) achieved negative minimal residual disease (MRD) after the treatment. Positive MRD during the follow up did not necessarily result in clinically relevant relapse. Cladribine followed by rituximab is highly effective even in patients with relapsed disease and HCLv, and can achieve durable remission.