1
|
Aljuhani W, Sayyad Y. Orthopedic Research Funding: Assessing the Relationship between Investments and Breakthroughs. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2024; 16:120368. [PMID: 38993375 PMCID: PMC11236838 DOI: 10.52965/001c.120368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Orthopedic research plays a crucial role in improving patient outcomes for musculoskeletal disorders. This narrative review explores the intricate interplay between funding patterns and the trajectory of breakthroughs achieved in this dynamic field. A meticulous search strategy identified studies illuminating the diverse sources of orthopedic research funding, including public funding (government agencies), philanthropic organizations, private sector investment, and international funding bodies. The review further delved into the spectrum of breakthroughs, encompassing fundamental scientific discoveries, technological advancements, and personalized medicine approaches. Public funding emerged as a significant pillar, supporting foundational research that lays the groundwork for future advancements. Philanthropic organizations addressed specific musculoskeletal disorders, often focusing on patient-centric applications. International funding bodies played a role in supporting research in low- and middle-income countries. Breakthroughs extended beyond cutting-edge prosthetics and minimally invasive surgeries, encompassing fundamental discoveries in areas like gene therapy and biomaterials science. Technological advancements included brain-computer interface prosthetics and 3D-printed implants. Personalized medicine offered the potential for tailored treatments based on individual needs and genetic profiles. This review underscores the complex interplay between funding patterns and breakthroughs in orthopedic research. A multifaceted approach is essential for continued progress. Fostering collaboration, optimizing funding models, and prioritizing both foundational and translational research hold the key to unlocking the true potential of orthopedic research and transforming the lives of patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wazzan Aljuhani
- Department of Surgery, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duarte ST, Moniz A, Costa D, Donato H, Heleno B, Aguiar P, Cruz EB. Low back pain management in primary healthcare: findings from a scoping review on models of care. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079276. [PMID: 38754873 PMCID: PMC11097853 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Models of care (MoCs) describe evidence-informed healthcare that should be delivered to patients. Several MoCs have been implemented for low back pain (LBP) to reduce evidence-to-practice gaps and increase the effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare services. OBJECTIVE To synthesise research evidence regarding core characteristics and key common elements of MoCs implemented in primary healthcare for the management of LBP. DESIGN Scoping review. DATA SOURCES Searches on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature databases were conducted. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligible records included MoCs implemented for adult LBP patients in primary healthcare settings. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction was carried out independently by two researchers and included a summary of the studies, the identification of the MoCs and respective key elements, concerning levels of care, settings, health professionals involved, type of care delivered and core components of the interventions. Findings were investigated through a descriptive qualitative content analysis using a deductive approach. RESULTS 29 studies reporting 11 MoCs were included. All MoCs were implemented in high-income countries and had clear objectives. Ten MoCs included a stratified care approach. The assessment of LBP patients typically occurred in primary healthcare while care delivery usually took place in community-based settings or outpatient clinics. Care provided by general practitioners and physiotherapists was reported in all MoCs. Education (n=10) and exercise (n=9) were the most common health interventions. However, intervention content, follow-ups and discharge criteria were not fully reported. CONCLUSIONS This study examines the features of MoCs for LBP, highlighting that research is in its early stages and stressing the need for better reporting to fill gaps in care delivery and implementation. This knowledge is crucial for researchers, clinicians and decision-makers in assessing the applicability and transferability of MoCs to primary healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Tinoco Duarte
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Alexandre Moniz
- Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS | FCM - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Daniela Costa
- Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal
- Department of Physiotherapy, Escola Superior de Saúde do Alcoitão, Alcabideche, Portugal
| | - Helena Donato
- Documentation and Scientific Information Service, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
- University of Coimbra Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Bruno Heleno
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS | FCM - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Pedro Aguiar
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Eduardo B Cruz
- Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moniz A, Duarte ST, Aguiar P, Caeiro C, Pires D, Fernandes R, Moço D, Marques MM, Sousa R, Canhão H, Branco J, Rodrigues AM, Cruz EB. Physiotherapists' barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a behaviour change-informed exercise intervention to promote the adoption of regular exercise practice in patients at risk of recurrence of low back pain: a qualitative study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:39. [PMID: 38279123 PMCID: PMC10811813 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02274-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrences of low back pain (LBP) are frequent and associated with high levels of disability and medical costs. Regular exercise practice may be an effective strategy to prevent recurrences of LBP, however, the promotion of this behaviour by physiotherapists seems to be challenging. This study aims to explore physiotherapists' perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a behaviour change-informed exercise intervention to promote the adoption of regular exercise practice by patients at risk of recurrence of low back pain. METHODS Two focus groups with primary healthcare physiotherapists were conducted, based on a semi-structured interview schedule informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel, including the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). All focus groups were held through videoconference, audio and video recorded and transcribed verbatim. A deductive content analysis, using a coding matrix based on the COM-B and TDF, was performed by two independent researchers. A third researcher was approached to settle disagreements. RESULTS In total, 14 physiotherapists participated in the focus groups. The analysis revealed a total of 13 barriers (4 COM-B components and 7 TDF domains) and 23 facilitators (5 COM-B and 13 TDF) to physiotherapists' implementation of a behaviour change-informed exercise intervention. The most common barriers were the lack of skills and confidence to implement the proposed intervention. These were explained by the fact that it differs from the usual practice of most participants and requires the learning of new skills applied to their contexts. However, for those who had already implemented other similar interventions or whose rationale is aligned with the new intervention, there seemed to exist more positive determinants, such as potential benefits for physiotherapists and the profession, improvement of quality of care and willingness to change clinical practice. For others who did not previously succeed in implementing these types of interventions, more context-related barriers were mentioned, such as lack of time to implement the intervention, schedule incompatibilities and lack of material and human resources. CONCLUSIONS This study identified modifiable barriers and facilitators to physiotherapists' implementation of a behaviour change-informed exercise intervention for patients at risk of recurrence of LBP in primary healthcare. The findings of this study will allow the systematic and theory-based development of a behaviour change-informed training programme, aimed at physiotherapists and supporting the successful implementation of the exercise intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Moniz
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
- EpiDoc Unit, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal.
| | - Susana T Duarte
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pedro Aguiar
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carmen Caeiro
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Diogo Pires
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rita Fernandes
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Diogo Moço
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Marta M Marques
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rute Sousa
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- EpiDoc Unit, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Helena Canhão
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- EpiDoc Unit, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jaime Branco
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- EpiDoc Unit, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Serviço de Reumatologia Do Hospital Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental (CHLO), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Maria Rodrigues
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- EpiDoc Unit, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Serviço de Reumatologia Do Hospital Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental (CHLO), Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Dos Lusíadas, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Eduardo B Cruz
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laurie E, Siebert S, Yongolo N, Halliday JEB, Biswaro SM, Krauth SJ, Kilonzo KG, Mmbaga BT, McIntosh E. Evidencing the clinical and economic burden of musculoskeletal disorders in Tanzania: paving the way for urgent rheumatology service development. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2023; 8:rkad110. [PMID: 38143512 PMCID: PMC10748784 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkad110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Laurie
- School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Stefan Siebert
- School of Infection & Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nateiya Yongolo
- Department of Clinical Research, Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kilimanjaro Clinical Medical University College, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Jo E B Halliday
- School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sanjura M Biswaro
- Department of Clinical Research, Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania
| | | | - Kajiru Gad Kilonzo
- Department for Internal Medicine, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Blandina T Mmbaga
- Department of Clinical Research, Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kilimanjaro Clinical Medical University College, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Emma McIntosh
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Sullivan DJ, Bearne LM, Harrington JM, McVeigh JG. Can social prescribing put the 'social' into the biopsychosocial management of people with long-term musculoskeletal disorders? Musculoskeletal Care 2023; 21:1341-1352. [PMID: 37639305 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are a significant burden on individuals' quality of life and society and are made more complex by the presence of multimorbidity. It is recommended that interventions targeting MSD be sustainable, equitable and incorporate the biopsychosocial model of care (BPS). AIMS A criticism of the BPS approach is that the social component of this model is not addressed adequately during the management of people with long-term MSD and that a gap exists between theory and implementation. The use of social prescribing (SP) as an intervention to bridge this gap is discussed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Social prescribing is a holistic non-medical person-centered approach to well-being that utilizes link workers (LW) to support individuals with long-term conditions (LTC) in the community. Social prescribing referrals are received from primary healthcare practitioners to LW and range from light touch signposting for employment or financial advice to more intensive support for LTC such as obesity, decreased physical activity and mental health needs. CONCLUSION There is evidence to suggest that SP interventions are effective in the management of LTC; however, due to the paucity of high-quality evidence, it is difficult to be conclusive. Large-scale randomised controlled trials are recommended to support the use of SP interventions in the management of LTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Declan J O'Sullivan
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Lindsay M Bearne
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Janas M Harrington
- School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Joseph G McVeigh
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Salmon DM, Chua J, Brown JC, Clacy A, Kerr ZY, Walters S, Keung S, Sullivan SJ, Register-Mihalik J, Whatman C, Sole G, Badenhorst M. Quest for clarity: investigating concussion-related responsibilities across the New Zealand Rugby Community System. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2023; 9:e001722. [PMID: 37860152 PMCID: PMC10582854 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a growing concern around concussions in rugby union, at all levels of the game. These concerns highlight the need to better manage and care for players. However, consistency around concussion-related responsibilities of stakeholders across the community rugby system remains challenging. Taking a systems thinking approach, this pragmatic, qualitative descriptive study explored key stakeholder groups within New Zealand's community rugby system's perceptions of their own and others' concussion-related responsibilities. Participants included players from schools and clubs, coaches, parents, team leads and representatives from four provincial unions. A total of 155 participants (67 females and 88 males) were included in the study. Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse data. Thirty concussion-related responsibilities were identified. These responsibilities were contained within four themes: (1) policies and support (responsibilities which influence policy, infrastructure, human or financial resources); (2) rugby culture and general management (responsibilities impacting players' welfare and safety, attitudes and behaviour, including education, injury reporting and communication); (3) individual capabilities (responsibilities demonstrating knowledge and confidence managing concussion, leadership or role/task shifting) and (4) intervention following a suspected concussion (immediate responsibilities as a consequence of a suspected concussion). The need for role clarity was a prominent finding across themes. Additionally, injury management initiatives should prioritise communication between stakeholders and consider task-shifting opportunities for stakeholders with multiple responsibilities. How concussions will realistically be managed in a real-world sports setting and by whom needs to be clearly defined and accepted by each stakeholder group. A 'framework of responsibilities' may act as a starting point for discussion within different individual community rugby contexts on how these responsibilities translate to their context and how these responsibilities can be approached and assigned among available stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Salmon
- Safety and Welfare, New Zealand Rugby, Wellington, New Zealand
- Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jason Chua
- Safety and Welfare, New Zealand Rugby, Wellington, New Zealand
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - James C Brown
- Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
- Institute of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Exercise, Sport and Lifestyle Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Amanda Clacy
- School of Law & Society, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
| | - Zachary Yukio Kerr
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Simon Walters
- Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sierra Keung
- Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - S John Sullivan
- Safety and Welfare, New Zealand Rugby, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Johna Register-Mihalik
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chris Whatman
- Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gisela Sole
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago - Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Marelise Badenhorst
- Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Armstrong E, Harvey LA, Payne NL, Zhang J, Ye P, Harris IA, Tian M, Ivers RQ. Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002273. [PMID: 37783525 PMCID: PMC10565304 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A hip fracture in an older person is a devastating injury. It impacts functional mobility, independence and survival. Models of care may provide a means for delivering integrated hip fracture care in less well-resourced settings. The aim of this review was to determine the elements of hip fracture models of care to inform the development of an adaptable model of care for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS Multiple databases were searched for papers reporting a hip fracture model of care for any part of the patient pathway from injury to rehabilitation. Results were limited to publications from 2000. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened based on eligibility criteria. Papers were evaluated with an equity lens against eight conceptual criteria adapted from an existing description of a model of care. RESULTS 82 papers were included, half of which were published since 2015. Only two papers were from middle-income countries and only two papers were evaluated as reporting all conceptual criteria from the existing description. The most identified criterion was an evidence-informed intervention and the least identified was the inclusion of patient stakeholders. CONCLUSION Interventions described as models of care for hip fracture are unlikely to include previously described conceptual criteria. They are most likely to be orthogeriatric approaches to service delivery, which is a barrier to their implementation in resource-limited settings. In LMICs, the provision of orthogeriatric competencies by other team members is an area for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Armstrong
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lara A Harvey
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Narelle L Payne
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jing Zhang
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pengpeng Ye
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- National Centre for Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Ian A Harris
- Orthopaedic Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maoyi Tian
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Rebecca Q Ivers
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cunningham J, Doyle F, Ryan JM, Clyne B, Cadogan C, Cottrell E, Murphy P, Smith SM, French HP. Primary care-based models of care for osteoarthritis; a scoping review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2023; 61:152221. [PMID: 37327762 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and describe the extent, nature, characteristics, and impact of primary care-based models of care (MoCs) for osteoarthritis (OA) that have been developed and/or evaluated. DESIGN Six electronic databases were searched from 2010 to May 2022. Relevant data were extracted and collated for narrative synthesis. RESULTS Sixty-three studies pertaining to 37 discrete MoCs from 13 countries were included, of which 23 (62%) could be classified as OA management programmes (OAMPs) comprising a self-management intervention to be delivered as a discrete package. Four models (11%) focussed on enhancing the initial consultation between a patient presenting with OA at the first point of contact into a local health system and the clinician. Emphasis was placed on educational training for general practitioners (GPs) and allied healthcare professionals delivering this initial consultation. The remaining 10 MoCs (27%) detailed integrated care pathways of onward referral to specialist secondary orthopaedic and rheumatology care within local healthcare systems. The majority (35/37; 95%) were developed in high-income countries and 32/37 (87%) targeted hip/and or knee OA. Frequently identified model components included GP-led care, referral to primary care services and multidisciplinary care. The models were predominantly 'one-size fits all' and lacked individualised care approaches. A minority of MoCs, 5/37 (14%) were developed using underlying frameworks, three (8%) of which incorporated behaviour change theories, while 13/37 (35%) incorporated provider training. Thirty-four of the 37 models (92%) were evaluated. Outcome domains most frequently reported included clinical outcomes, followed by system- and provider-level outcomes. While there was evidence of improved quality of OA care associated with the models, effects on clinical outcomes were mixed. CONCLUSION There are emerging efforts internationally to develop evidence-based models focused on non-surgical primary care OA management. Notwithstanding variations in healthcare systems and resources, future research should focus on model development alignment with implementation science frameworks and theories, key stakeholder involvement including patient and public representation, provision of training and education for providers, treatment individualisation, integration and coordination of services across the care continuum and incorporation of behaviour change strategies to foster long-term adherence and self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joice Cunningham
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Frank Doyle
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jennifer M Ryan
- Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barbara Clyne
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cathal Cadogan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Paul Murphy
- RCSI Library, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan M Smith
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helen P French
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Parambath S, Costa N, Schneider CH, Blyth FM. What guides back pain care? A content analysis of low back pain directives in the Australian context. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:49. [PMID: 37312183 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00997-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disease burden around the world. There is known clinical variation in how LBP is treated and addressed; with one cited reason the lack of availability, or use of, evidence-based guidance for clinicians, consumers, and administrators. Despite this a considerable number of policy directives such as clinical practice guidelines, models of care and clinical tools with the aim of improving quality of LBP care do exist. Here we report on the development of a repository of LBP directives developed in the Australian health system and a content analysis of those directives aimed at deepening our understanding of the guidance landscape. Specifically, we sought to determine: (1) What is the type, scale, and scope of LBP directives available? (2) Who are the key stakeholders that drive low back pain care through directives? (3) What content do they cover? (4) What are their gaps and deficiencies? METHODS We used online web search and snowballing methods to collate a repository of LBP policy documents collectively called 'directives' including Models of Care (MOC), information sheets, clinical tools, guidelines, surveys, and reports, from the last 20 years. The texts of the directives were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis adopting methods from descriptive policy content analysis to categorise and analyse content to determine origins, actors, and themes. RESULTS Eighty-four directives were included in our analysis. Of those, 55 were information sheets aimed at either healthcare providers or patients, nine were clinical tools, three were reports, four were guidelines, four were MOC, two were questionnaires and five were referral forms/criteria. The three main categories of content found in the directives were 1. Low back pain features 2. Standards for clinical encounters and 3. Management of LBP, each of which gave rise to different themes and subthemes. Universities, not-for-profit organizations, government organisations, hospitals/Local Health Districts, professional organisations, consumers, and health care insurers were all involved in the production of policy directives. However, there were no clear patterns of roles, responsibilities or authority between these stakeholder groups. CONCLUSION Directives have the potential to inform practice and to contribute to reducing evidence-policy-practice discordance. Documents in our repository demonstrate that while a range of directives exist across Australia, but the evidence base for many was not apparent. Qualitative content analysis of the directives showed that while there has been increasing attention given to models of care, this is not yet reflected in directives, which generally focus on more specific elements of LBP care at the individual patient and practitioner level. The sheer number and variety of directives, from a wide range of sources and various locations within the Australian health system suggests a fragmented policy landscape without clear authoritative sources. There is a need for clearer, easily accessible trustworthy policy directives that are regularly reviewed and that meet the needs of care providers, and information websites need to be evaluated regularly for their evidence-based nature and quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarika Parambath
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Nathalia Costa
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carmen Huckel Schneider
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona M Blyth
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Al-Ajlouni YA, Al Ta'ani O, Mushasha R, Lee JL, Capoor J, Kapadia MR, Alejandro R. The burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: a longitudinal analysis from the global burden of disease dataset 1990-2019. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:439. [PMID: 37259119 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06556-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders are one of the main causes of disability among adults globally. The burden of MSK disorders varies greatly between different regions and is the highest in low- and middle income- countries. This study sought to investigate trends in the burden of MSK disorders across the MENA region, utilizing the GBD 2019 dataset. METHODS This ecological study utilized data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) to report on the burden of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders in The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region between 1990 and 2019. Our analysis involved descriptive statistics and sociodemographic trends and did not employ any specific statistical analyses. Using age-standardized rates of prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), we reported trends in the burden of MSK disorders, as well as national variation between different countries. Furthermore, we analyzed trends in risk factors contributing to MSK disorders by age and gender. RESULTS The longitudinal analysis from 1990 to 2019 showed an increase in the age-standardized rate for prevalence and DALYs of MSK disorders by 5% and 4.80%, respectively. Low back pain continued to be the most prevalent MSK condition, while RA and other MSK disorders had the largest percentage increase for DALYs between 1990 and 2019. The study found that Afghanistan had the lowest age standardized DALYs rate attributed to MSK disorders, while Iran, Turkey, and Jordan had the highest. Further, Syria showed the most dramatic decrease while Saudi Arabia had the most notable increase in age standardized DALY rates from 1990 to 2019. In 2019, occupational risks, high body mass index, and tobacco smoking were the main risk factors for MSK disorders, with occupational risks being the largest contributor, and between 1990 and 2019, there was a decrease in the contribution of occupational risks but an increase in the contribution of high body mass index as a risk factor. CONCLUSION This study highlights the significant burden of MSK disorders in the MENA region, with various risk factors contributing to its increasing prevalence in recent decades. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying factors and potential interventions that could improve health outcomes. Addressing MSK disorders should be a public health priority in the region, and efforts should be made to develop effective strategies to prevent and manage this debilitating condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Omar Al Ta'ani
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA
| | - Rand Mushasha
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Justin Lin Lee
- New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | | | - Mitul R Kapadia
- Department of Pediatrics and Orthopedics, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Ruth Alejandro
- New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ng W, Beales D, Gucciardi DF, Slater H. Applying the behavioural change wheel to guide the implementation of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain care. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1169178. [PMID: 37228807 PMCID: PMC10204590 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1169178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Achieving high value, biopsychosocial pain care can be complex, involving multiple stakeholders working synergistically to support the implementation of quality care. In order to empower healthcare professionals to assess, identify and analyse biopsychosocial factors contributing to musculoskeletal pain, and describe what changes are needed in the whole-of-system to navigate this complexity, we aimed to: (1) map established barriers and enablers influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain against behaviour change frameworks; and (2) identify behaviour change techniques to facilitate and support the adoption and improve pain education. A five-step process informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) was undertaken: (i) from a recently published qualitative evidence synthesis, barriers and enablers were mapped onto the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) using "best fit" framework synthesis; (ii) relevant stakeholder groups involved in the whole-of-health were identified as audiences for potential interventions; (iii) possible intervention functions were considered based on the Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety, Equity criteria; (iv) a conceptual model was synthesised to understand the behavioural determinants underpinning biopsychosocial pain care; (v) behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to improve adoption were identified. Barriers and enablers mapped onto 5/6 components of the COM-B model and 12/15 domains on the TDF. Multi-stakeholder groups including healthcare professionals, educators, workplace managers, guideline developers and policymakers were identified as target audiences for behavioural interventions, specifically education, training, environmental restructuring, modelling and enablement. A framework was derived with six BCTs identified from the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (version 1). Adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain involves a complex set of behavioural determinants, relevant across multiple audiences, reflecting the importance of a whole-of-system approach to musculoskeletal health. We proposed a worked example on how to operationalise the framework and apply the BCTs. Evidence-informed strategies are recommended to empower healthcare professionals to assess, identify and analyse biopsychosocial factors, as well as targeted interventions relevant to various stakeholders. These strategies can help to strengthen a whole-of-system adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to pain care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Ng
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Darren Beales
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Daniel F. Gucciardi
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baroni MP, Hespanhol L, Miyamoto GC, Daniel CR, Fernandes LG, Dos Reis FJJ, Pate JW, Saragiotto BT. Implementation of an online pain science education for chronic musculoskeletal pain in Brazilian public health system: protocol for a hybrid type III randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:277. [PMID: 37038146 PMCID: PMC10088297 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06360-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although clinical practice guidelines recommend pain education as the first-line option for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain, there is a lack of pain education programmes in healthcare. Thus, digital health programmes can be an effective tool for implementing pain education strategies for public health. This trial will aim to analyse the implementation and effectiveness outcomes of three online pain science education strategies in the Brazilian public health system (SUS) for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS We will conduct a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. We will include adult individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, recruited from primary healthcare in the city of Guarapuava, Brazil. Individuals will be randomised to three implementation groups receiving a pain science education intervention (EducaDor) but delivered in different modalities: group 1) synchronous online; group 2) asynchronous videos; and group 3) interactive e-book only. Implementation outcomes will include acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption, fidelity, penetration, sustainability, and costs. We will also assess effectiveness outcomes, such as pain, function, quality of life, sleep, self-efficacy, and adverse effects. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will be conducted from the SUS and societal perspectives. The evaluations will be done at baseline, post-intervention (10 weeks), and 6 months. DISCUSSION This study will develop and implement a collaborative intervention model involving primary healthcare professionals, secondary-level healthcare providers, and patients to enhance self-management of chronic pain. In addition to promoting better pain management, this study will also contribute to the field of implementation science in public health by generating important insights and recommendations for future interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05302180; 03/29/2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina P Baroni
- Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
- Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Estadual Do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO), Alameda Élio Antonio Dalla Vecchia, 838, CEP 85040-167, Vila Carli, Guarapuava, PR, Brazil.
- Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Luiz Hespanhol
- Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Amsterdam Collaboration On Health & Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) Location VU University Medical Center Amsterdam (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gisela C Miyamoto
- Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Department of Health Science of Vrije, Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christiane R Daniel
- Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Estadual Do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO), Alameda Élio Antonio Dalla Vecchia, 838, CEP 85040-167, Vila Carli, Guarapuava, PR, Brazil
- Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Lívia G Fernandes
- Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Felipe J J Dos Reis
- Department of Physical Therapy, Instituto Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Joshua W Pate
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bruno T Saragiotto
- Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo, Brazil
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boyle EM, Fary RE, Lee S, Mikhailov A, Evans K, Rebbeck T, Beales DJ. Patient perspectives of care pathways for people with low back pain: A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62:102657. [PMID: 36058010 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) care pathways aim to enhance health outcomes through patient-clinician mutual decision-making and care coordination. However, challenges to successful translation into practice include patients' understanding, expectation, and acceptance of treatment and management strategies for LBP. This study explored patients' perspectives and/or experience of care pathways and their involvement in decision-making in primary care. METHODS A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 participants with LBP recruited from the community. Inductive thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted within the design framework to enable a systematic comparison of experiences across participants and within individual cases. RESULTS Five themes described participant perspectives and understanding of care pathways: i) care pathways can guide decision-making; ii) familiarity with no and/or stepped care pathway, but preference for matched or blend of care pathways; iii) engaging in shared decision-making; iv) patient-related barriers to implementation; v) patient-related facilitators to implementation. CONCLUSIONS Participants felt that existing care pathways did not meet their needs when pain persisted. Participants preferred matched or hybrid care pathways and suggested that implementation of such pathways should focus on addressing an individual's needs. Adopting a holistic approach, and clarity in shared decision-making, were deemed crucial for effective implementation of LBP pathways in practice. Consumer (patient) engagement in the design of LBP care pathways is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen M Boyle
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Robyn E Fary
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Samantha Lee
- Department of Allied Health, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore
| | - Anton Mikhailov
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kerrie Evans
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Healthia Limited, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Darren J Beales
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Framework to Guide the Development of Health Care Professional Education and Training in Best Evidence Osteoarthritis Care. Clin Geriatr Med 2022; 38:361-384. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
15
|
Best Evidence Osteoarthritis Care. Clin Geriatr Med 2022; 38:287-302. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
16
|
Manhas KP, Olson K, Churchill K, Miller J, Teare S, Vohra S, Wasylak T. Exploring patient centredness, communication and shared decision-making under a new model of care: Community rehabilitation in canada. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:1051-1063. [PMID: 33825236 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Patient-centred care and patient engagement in healthcare and health research are widely mandated by funders, health systems and institutions. Increasingly, shared decision-making (SDM) is recognised as promoting patient-centred care. We explore this relationship by studying SDM in the context of integrating novel patient-centred policies in community rehabilitation. There is little research on SDM in rehabilitation, and less so in the critical community context. Patient co-investigators led study co-design. We aimed to describe how patients and providers experience SDM at community rehabilitation sites that adopted a novel, patient-centred Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC). Guided by focused ethnography, we conducted focus groups and interviews. Patient and professional participants were recruited from 10 RMoC early-adopter community rehabilitation sites. Sites varied in geography, patient population and provider disciplines. Patient and community engagement researchers used a set-collect-reflect method to document patient perspectives. Researchers captured provider perspectives using a semi-structured question guide. We completed 11 focus groups and 18 interviews (n = 45 providers, n = 17 patients). We found that most early-adopter providers spoke in a shared, patient-first language that focused on patient readiness, barriers and active listening. Congruent patient perceptions reflected inclusion in decision-making, goal setting and positive relationships. Many patients queried how care would become and remain accessible before and after community rehabilitation care respectively. Remaining connected while in the community was described as important to patients. Providers identified barriers like time, team dynamics and lack of clarity on the RMoC aims, which challenged the initiative's long-term sustainability. Policy innovations can promote SDM and communication through multiple strategies and training to facilitate candid, encouraging conversations. Sustainability of SDM gains is paramount. Most providers moved beyond tokenistic engagement, but competing responsibilities and team member resistance could thwart continuity. Further research is needed to empirically assess respectful and compassionate communication and SDM in community rehabilitation long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Pohar Manhas
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Integrative Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Karin Olson
- Integrative Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Katie Churchill
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jean Miller
- Patient and Community Engagement Research Program, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sylvia Teare
- Patient and Community Engagement Research Program, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sunita Vohra
- Integrative Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Tracy Wasylak
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Duarte ST, Nunes C, Costa D, Donato H, Cruz EB. Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053848. [PMID: 35379620 PMCID: PMC8981342 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide and it is responsible for high healthcare costs and resources consumption. It represents a challenge for primary care services that struggle to implement evidence-based practice. Models of care (MoCs) are arising as effective solutions to overcome this problem, leading to better health outcomes. Although there is growing evidence regarding MoCs for the management of LBP patients, an analysis of the existing body of evidence has not yet been carried out. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and map the current evidence about the implementation of MoCs for LBP in primary healthcare. Findings from this study will inform policy makers, health professionals and researchers about their characteristics and outcomes, guiding future research and best practice models. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies that implemented an MoC for LBP patients in primary healthcare will be included. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, grey literature databases and relevant organisations websites. This review will consider records from 2000, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Two researchers will independently screen all citations and full-text articles and abstract data. Data extracted will include the identification of the MoC, key elements of the intervention, organisational components, context-specific factors and patient-related, system-related and implementation-related outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As a secondary analysis, this study does not require ethical approval. It will provide a comprehensive understanding on existing MoCs for LBP, outcomes and context-related challenges that may influence implementation in primary healthcare, which is meaningful knowledge to inform future research in this field. Findings will be disseminated through research papers in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at relevant conferences and documentation for professional organisations and stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Tinoco Duarte
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Carla Nunes
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Daniela Costa
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Helena Donato
- Documentation and Scientific Information Service, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Eduardo B Cruz
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- Physical Therapy Department, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setubal, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ng W, Slater H, Starcevich C, Wright A, Mitchell T, Beales D. Barriers and enablers influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Pain 2021; 162:2154-2185. [PMID: 33534357 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A substantial evidence-practice gap exists between healthcare professionals learning about the biopsychosocial model of pain and adopting this model in clinical practice. This review aimed to explore the barriers and enablers that influence the application of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain in practice, from the clinicians' perspective. Qualitative evidence synthesis was used. Four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) were searched. Primary qualitative studies were included if they investigated the experiences of primary healthcare professionals using a biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal pain care in outpatient settings or their perceptions towards biopsychosocial-oriented clinical practice guidelines. After screening 6571 abstracts, 77 full-text articles were retrieved. Twenty-five studies met the eligibility criteria, reporting the experiences of 413 healthcare professionals (including general practitioners, physiotherapists, and others) spanning 11 countries. Three metathemes were identified that impact the adoption of the biopsychosocial model across the whole of health: (1) at the microlevel, healthcare professionals' personal factors, knowledge and skills, and their misconceptions of clinical practice guidelines, perception of patients' factors, and time; (2) at the mesolevel, clinical practice guideline formulation, community factors, funding models, health service provision, resourcing issues, and workforce training issues; and (3) at the macrolevel, health policy, organizational, and social factors. Synthesized data revealed multilevel (whole-of-health) barriers and enablers to health professionals adopting a biopsychosocial model of pain into practice. Awareness of these multilevel factors may help inform preimplementation preparedness and support more effective implementation of the biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal pain into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Ng
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Cobie Starcevich
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anthony Wright
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Tim Mitchell
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Pain Options, South Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Darren Beales
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Pain Options, South Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Costa D, Cruz EB, Rodrigues AM, Gonçalves-Bradley D, Gomes LA, Donato H, Nunes C. Models of care for patients with knee osteoarthritis in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045358. [PMID: 34158296 PMCID: PMC8220471 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent condition with associated high disability and healthcare costs. Evidence of major gaps in the implementation of evidence-based interventions in people with knee OA led several healthcare systems to implement models of care (MoCs) in order to improve knowledge translation and guaranty their economic sustainability. Nevertheless, there are few studies that analyse the existing body of evidence of MoCs for patients with knee OA in primary healthcare settings. Therefore, we aim to identify MoCs developed for patients with knee OA implemented in primary healthcare and, analyse their core components and outcomes. This scoping review will create knowledge about the components and outcomes of these MoCs which, in the future, will facilitate their transferability to practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will include studies that developed and implemented an MoC for people with knee OA in primary healthcare. We will use the PCC mnemonic, being 'Population'-people with Knee OA, 'Concept'-the MoCs and 'Context'-the primary healthcare setting. We will conduct the search on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, as well as grey literature databases and relevant institutions and organisations websites, for articles published after 2000. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts followed by a full-text review to assess papers regarding their eligibility. We will evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies with the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool and apply a data abstraction form to describe and interpret the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As a secondary analysis, this scoping review does not require ethical approval. Findings will be published in peer-review journal, presented in scientific conferences and as a summary through primary healthcare units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Costa
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- EpiDoC Unit - Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Eduardo B Cruz
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Physical Therapy Department, School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Ana M Rodrigues
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- EpiDoC Unit - Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Luís A Gomes
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- EpiDoC Unit - Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Physical Therapy Department, School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Helena Donato
- Documentation and Scientific Information Service, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Carla Nunes
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morsø L, Bogh SB, Ris I, Kongsted A. Mind the gap - Evaluation of the promotion initiatives for implementation of the GLA:D® back clinician courses. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021; 53:102373. [PMID: 33823485 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Translation of research into practice is a methodological challenge. The GLA:D® Back program was initiated to implement evidence-based care for people with low back pain inspired by GLA:D® (Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark) that has succeeded in implementing evidence-based care for knee and hip osteoarthritis. This study evaluates the spread and reach of promotion initiatives for GLA:D® Back clinician courses, and the adoption of the GLA:D® Back intervention in clinical practice. METHODS Pre-defined success criteria addressed; i) spread; achievement of intended promotion activities (e.g. social media), ii) reach; recruitment of clinicians with certain profiles (e.g. gender balance). Adoption was defined as patient enrollment in the GLA:D® Back registry by course participants. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate associations between adoption and clinician characteristics. RESULTS Most clinicians signed up based on information from colleagues (22%). Pre-defined goals for reach, except one, was obtained. 23% (140) of clinicians initiated the GLA:D® Back program in clinical practice within <90 days of course participation; mainly physiotherapists (p < 0.001). The odds ratio for starting GLA:D® Back patient care in a chiropractic setting was 7.4 [2.5; 21.4], indicating that physiotherapists employed by chiropractors mostly handled the intervention. CONCLUSION Future promotion strategies should recognize the influence of colleagues and professional networks. Converting clinician courses into patient care was mostly adopted physiotherapists. Although, evaluation processes were less useful in this study, future evaluation of health care processes has potential to inform the implementation of new models in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Morsø
- Open Patient Explorative Network (OPEN), Region of Suothern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Søren Bie Bogh
- Open Patient Explorative Network (OPEN), Region of Suothern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Inge Ris
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics (NIKKB), Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Briggs AM, Huckel Schneider C, Slater H, Jordan JE, Parambath S, Young JJ, Sharma S, Kopansky-Giles D, Mishrra S, Akesson KE, Ali N, Belton J, Betteridge N, Blyth FM, Brown R, Debere D, Dreinhöfer KE, Finucane L, Foster HE, Gimigliano F, Haldeman S, Haq SA, Horgan B, Jain A, Joshipura M, Kalla AA, Lothe J, Matsuda S, Mobasheri A, Mwaniki L, Nordin MC, Pattison M, Reis FJJ, Soriano ER, Tick H, Waddell J, Wiek D, Woolf AD, March L. Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e006045. [PMID: 37904582 PMCID: PMC8215245 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the profound burden of disease, a strategic global response to optimise musculoskeletal (MSK) health and guide national-level health systems strengthening priorities remains absent. Auspiced by the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health (G-MUSC), we aimed to empirically derive requisite priorities and components of a strategic response to guide global and national-level action on MSK health. METHODS Design: mixed-methods, three-phase design.Phase 1: qualitative study with international key informants (KIs), including patient representatives and people with lived experience. KIs characterised the contemporary landscape for MSK health and priorities for a global strategic response.Phase 2: scoping review of national health policies to identify contemporary MSK policy trends and foci.Phase 3: informed by phases 1-2, was a global eDelphi where multisectoral panellists rated and iterated a framework of priorities and detailed components/actions. RESULTS Phase 1: 31 KIs representing 25 organisations were sampled from 20 countries (40% low and middle income (LMIC)). Inductively derived themes were used to construct a logic model to underpin latter phases, consisting of five guiding principles, eight strategic priority areas and seven accelerators for action.Phase 2: of the 165 documents identified, 41 (24.8%) from 22 countries (88% high-income countries) and 2 regions met the inclusion criteria. Eight overarching policy themes, supported by 47 subthemes, were derived, aligning closely with the logic model.Phase 3: 674 panellists from 72 countries (46% LMICs) participated in round 1 and 439 (65%) in round 2 of the eDelphi. Fifty-nine components were retained with 10 (17%) identified as essential for health systems. 97.6% and 94.8% agreed or strongly agreed the framework was valuable and credible, respectively, for health systems strengthening. CONCLUSION An empirically derived framework, co-designed and strongly supported by multisectoral stakeholders, can now be used as a blueprint for global and country-level responses to improve MSK health and prioritise system strengthening initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Carmen Huckel Schneider
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Sarika Parambath
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James J Young
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Saurab Sharma
- Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal
| | - Deborah Kopansky-Giles
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Swatee Mishrra
- Sydney Musculoskeletal, Bone and Joint Health Alliance. Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristina E Akesson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nuzhat Ali
- Health Improvement, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Joletta Belton
- Global Alliance of Partners for Pain Advocacy, International Association for the Study of Pain, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Fiona M Blyth
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Brown
- World Federation of Chiropractic, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Demelash Debere
- Rehabilitation International (Africa Region), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Karsten E Dreinhöfer
- Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Finucane
- International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists Incorporated (IFOMPT), World Physiotherapy, London, UK
- Sussex MSK Partnership, Physiotherapy Department, National Health Service, Brighton, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Population Health Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Scott Haldeman
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California, USA
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- World Spine Care, Santa Ana, California, USA
| | - Syed A Haq
- Rheumatology Department, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Ben Horgan
- Consumer and Community Involvement Program, West Australian Health Translation Network, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anil Jain
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, Jaipur, India
| | | | - Asgar A Kalla
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jakob Lothe
- Norwegian Council for Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Shuichi Matsuda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ali Mobasheri
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Departments of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Margareta C Nordin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York City, NY, USA
- Department of Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Marilyn Pattison
- World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), London, UK
- MPOT/Access Fitness and Talking Matters, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Felipe J J Reis
- Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Clinical Medicine Department, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Enrique R Soriano
- Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Services and University Institute, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Heather Tick
- Department of Family Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Academic Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health, New Buffalo, Michigan, USA
| | - James Waddell
- Saint Michael's Hospital Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dieter Wiek
- People with Arthritis and Rheumatism, European Alliance for Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), Kilchberg, Switzerland
| | - Anthony D Woolf
- Bone and Joint Research Group, Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Lyn March
- Sydney Musculoskeletal, Bone and Joint Health Alliance. Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Manhas KP, Olson K, Churchill K, Vohra S, Wasylak T. Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:bmjoq-2020-001261. [PMID: 33758007 PMCID: PMC7993209 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2017, a provincial health-system released a Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC) to promote patient-centred care, provincial standardisation and data-driven innovation. Eighteen early-adopter community-rehabilitation teams implemented the RMoC using a 1.5-year-long Innovation Learning Collaborative (in-person learning sessions; balanced scorecards). More research is required on developing, implementing and evaluating models of care. We aimed to explore experiences of early-adopter providers and provincial consultants involved in the community-rehabilitation RMoC implementation in Alberta, Canada. Methods Using focused ethnography, we used focus groups (or interviews for feasibility/confidentiality) and aggregate, site-level data analysis of RMoC standardised metrics. Purposive sampling ensured representation across geography, service types and patient populations. Team-specific focus groups were onsite and led by a researcher-moderator and cofacilitator. A semistructured question guide promoted discussions on interesting/challenging occurrences; perceptions of RMoC impact and perceptions of successful implementation. Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed alongside field notes. Data collection and analysis were concurrent to saturation. Transcripts coding involves collapsing similar ideas into themes, with intertheme relationships identified. Rigour tactics included negative case analysis, thick description and audit trail. Results We completed 11 focus groups and seven interviews (03/2018 to 01/2019) (n=45). Participants were 89.6% women, mostly Canadian trained and represented diverse rehabilitation professions. The implementation experience involved navigating emotions, operating among dynamics and integrating the RMoC details. Confident, satisfied early-adopter teams demonstrated traits including strong coping strategies; management support and being opportunistic and candid about failure. Teams faced common challenges (eg, emotions of change; delayed data access and lack of efficient, memorable communication across team and site). Implementation success targeted patient, team and system levels. Conclusions We recommend training priorities for future teams including evaluation training for novice teams; timelines for stepwise implementation; on-site, in-person time with a facilitator and full-team present and prolonged facilitated introductions between similar teams for long-term mentorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Pohar Manhas
- Neurosciences, Rehabilitation & Vision Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Karin Olson
- Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Katie Churchill
- Health Professions, Strategy and Practice, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sunita Vohra
- Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tracy Wasylak
- Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jones AR, Tay CT, Melder A, Vincent AJ, Teede H. What Are Models of Care? A Systematic Search and Narrative Review to Guide Development of Care Models for Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. Semin Reprod Med 2021; 38:323-330. [PMID: 33684948 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
No specific model of care (MoC) is recommended for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), despite awareness that POI is associated with comorbidities requiring multidisciplinary care. This article aims to explore the definitions and central components of MoC in health settings, so that care models for POI can be developed. A systematic search was performed on Ovid Medline and Embase, and including gray literature. Unique definitions of MoC were identified, and thematic analysis was used to summarize the key component of MoC. Of 2,477 articles identified, 8 provided unique definitions of MoC, and 11 described components of MoC. Definitions differ in scope, focusing on disease, service, or system level, but a key feature is that MoC is operational, describing how care is delivered, as well as what that care is. Thematic analysis identified 42 components of MoC, summarized into 6 themes-stakeholder engagement, supporting integrated care, evidence-based care, defined outcomes and evaluation, behavior change methodology, and adaptability. Stakeholder engagement was central to all other themes. MoCs operationalize how best practice care can be delivered at a disease, service, or systems level. Specific MoC should be developed for POI, to improve clinical and process outcomes, translate evidence into practice, and use resources more efficiently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia R Jones
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chau T Tay
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Melder
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Partner's Academic Health Science Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda J Vincent
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Partner's Academic Health Science Centre, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chua J, Hansen P, Briggs AM, Wilson R, Gwynne-Jones D, Abbott JH. Stakeholders' preferences for osteoarthritis interventions in health services: A cross-sectional study using multi-criteria decision analysis. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2020; 2:100110. [PMID: 36474881 PMCID: PMC9718075 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To combine cross-sectoral stakeholders' preferences over interventions for knee osteoarthritis (OA) with guideline recommendations and evidence about interventions, and to investigate if these preferences differ by stakeholder group. Design A survey based on multi-criteria decision analysis was implemented whereby the stakeholders revealed the relative importance, represented as weights, of eight criteria for choosing or recommending knee OA interventions. Using data from an OA clinical guideline, 15 recommended interventions were rated on the criteria and ranked by their total scores, calculated by summing the corresponding weights. Associations between the weights and stakeholder groups were explored using regression analysis. Results Participants comprised 58 consumers with OA, 5 Māori health advocates, 79 healthcare providers, 24 policy-informants and 12 OA-researchers (N = 178; 63% female, [mean age±SD] 54 ± 13 years). Mean weights on the eight criteria, in decreasing order of importance, are: recommendation: 19.0%; quality of evidence: 17.7%; effectiveness: 15.0%; duration of effect: 13.2%; risk of serious harm: 12.8%; risk of mild/moderate side-effects: 9.4%; cost: 6.6%; and accessibility: 6.3%. For first-, second- and third-line OA interventions respectively, all land-based exercise (total score = 71.7%), NSAIDs (topical) (74.2%) and total joint replacement (74.3%) were ranked first. At all care phases, the recommended core interventions of weight management and self-management education ranked between 11th and 15th (48.0%-56.0%). Regression analysis identified only small differences in weights (≤5.7%; p < 0.01) between stakeholder groups. Conclusions Not all recommended core interventions are preferred by cross-sectoral stakeholders, which may represent a barrier to their uptake. Stakeholders' preferences do not appreciably differ by stakeholder group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Chua
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Paul Hansen
- Department of Economics, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Andrew M. Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Australia
| | - Ross Wilson
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - David Gwynne-Jones
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - J. Haxby Abbott
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fitzgerald K, Vaughan B, Fleischmann M, Pritchard S, Mulcahy J, Austin P. Utilisation of pain counselling in osteopathic practice: secondary analysis of a nationally representative sample of Australian osteopaths. Scand J Pain 2020; 21:330-338. [PMID: 34387951 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Advice, reassurance and education are recommended as first line treatments for musculoskeletal pain conditions such as low back pain. Osteopaths are registered primary contact allied health professionals in the Australian healthcare system who primarily manage acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of Australian osteopaths who do and do not utilise advice, reassurance and education (pain counselling) in their clinical practice, and determine the characteristics associated with the frequency of using pain counselling in clinical practice. METHODS A secondary analysis of practice characteristics from a nationally representative sample of Australian osteopaths was undertaken. Participants completed a 27-item practice characteristics questionnaire between July-December 2016. Bivariate analyses were used to identify significant variables for inclusion in a backward multiple logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated for significant variables. RESULTS Responses were received from 991 Australian osteopaths, representing 49% of the profession. Of these 264 (26.64%) indicated often utilising pain counselling, and 727 (73.36%) reported not often utilising pain counselling. Those who utilised pain counselling were more than twice as likely to report research evidence had a high impact on their clinical practice (OR 2.11), and nearly twice as likely to discuss physical activity with their patients (OR 1.84). CONCLUSIONS Pain counselling is under-utilised by nearly three quarters of the Australian osteopathic profession as a management strategy. Future studies are required to explore the reasons why most in the profession comprised in this sample are infrequently utilising this guideline recommendation. Given the frequency of chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions presenting to Australian osteopaths, strategies appear to be needed to advance the profession via professional development in accessing and using evidence-based care for pain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie Fitzgerald
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora Campus, 264 Plenty Rd, Mill Park 3082, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Brett Vaughan
- Department of Medical Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Fleischmann
- School of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shane Pritchard
- Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane Mulcahy
- School of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Phil Austin
- Department of Palliative Care, HammondCare, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Egerton T, Hinman RS, Hunter DJ, Bowden JL, Nicolson PJA, Atkins L, Pirotta M, Bennell KL. PARTNER: a service delivery model to implement optimal primary care management of people with knee osteoarthritis: description of development. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040423. [PMID: 33033032 PMCID: PMC7542957 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Implementation strategies, such as new models of service delivery, are needed to address evidence practice gaps. This paper describes the process of developing and operationalising a new model of service delivery to implement recommended care for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) in a primary care setting. METHODS Three development stages occurred concurrently and iteratively. Each stage considered the healthcare context and was informed by stakeholder input. Stage 1 involved the design of a new model of service delivery (PARTNER). Stage 2 developed a behavioural change intervention targeting general practitioners (GPs) using the behavioural change wheel framework. In stage 3, the 'Care Support Team' component of the service delivery model was operationalised. RESULTS The focus of PARTNER is to provide patients with education, exercise and/or weight loss advice, and facilitate effective self-management through behavioural change support. Stage 1 model design: based on clinical practice guidelines, known evidence practice gaps in current care, chronic disease management frameworks, input from stakeholders and the opportunities and constraints afforded by the Australian primary care context, we developed the PARTNER service-delivery model. The key components are: (1) an effective GP consultation and (2) follow-up and ongoing care provided remotely (telephone/email/online resources) by a 'Care Support Team'. Stage 2 GP behavioural change intervention: a multimodal behavioural change intervention was developed comprising a self-audit/feedback activity, online professional development and desktop software to provide decision support, patient information resources and a referral mechanism to the 'Care Support Team'. Stage 3 operationalising the 'care support team'-staff recruited and trained in evidence-based knee OA management and behavioural change methodology. CONCLUSION The PARTNER model is the result of a comprehensive implementation strategy development process using evidence, behavioural change theory and intervention development guidelines. Technologies for scalable delivery were harnessed and new primary evidence was generated as part of the process.Trial registration number ACTRN12617001595303 (UTN U1111-1197-4809).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorlene Egerton
- Centre for Health Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rana S Hinman
- Centre for Health Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jocelyn L Bowden
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philippa J A Nicolson
- Centre for Health Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lou Atkins
- Centre for Behaviour Change, UCL, London, UK
| | - Marie Pirotta
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim L Bennell
- Centre for Health Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Speerin R, Needs C, Chua J, Woodhouse LJ, Nordin M, McGlasson R, Briggs AM. Implementing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in health systems to support value-based care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2020; 34:101548. [PMID: 32723576 PMCID: PMC7382572 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Models of Care (MoCs), and their local Models of Service Delivery, for people with musculoskeletal conditions are becoming an acceptable way of supporting effective implementation of value-based care. MoCs can support the quadruple aim of value-based care through providing people with musculoskeletal disease improved access to health services, better health outcomes and satisfactory experience of their healthcare; ensure the health professionals involved are experiencing satisfaction in delivering such care and health system resources are better utilised. Implementation of MoCs is relevant at the levels of clinical practice (micro), service delivery organisations (meso) and health system (macro) levels. The development, implementation and evaluation of MoCs has evolved over the last decade to more purposively engage people with lived experience of their condition, to operationalise the Chronic Care Model and to employ innovative solutions. This paper explores how MoCs have evolved and are supporting the delivery of value-based care in health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Speerin
- The Sydney University, Level 7, Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, ST LEONARDS, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Christopher Needs
- Department of Rheumatology, Level 4, QEII Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 59 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Jason Chua
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| | - Linda J Woodhouse
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Rhona McGlasson
- Bone & Joint Canada, P.O. Box 1036, Toronto, ON, M5K 1P2, Canada.
| | - Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Briggs AM, Shiffman J, Shawar YR, Åkesson K, Ali N, Woolf AD. Global health policy in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities to arrest the global disability burden from musculoskeletal health conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2020; 34:101549. [PMID: 32713802 PMCID: PMC7377715 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The profound burden of disease associated with musculoskeletal health conditions is well established. Despite the unequivocal disability burden and personal and societal consequences, relative to other non-communicable diseases (NCDs), system-level responses for musculoskeletal conditions that are commensurate with their burden have been lacking nationally and globally. Health policy priorities and responses in the 21st century have evolved significantly from the 20th century, with health systems now challenged by an increasing prevalence and impact of NCDs and an unprecedented rate of global population ageing. Further, health policy priorities are now strongly aligned to the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. With this background, what are the challenges and opportunities available to influence global health policy to support high-value care for musculoskeletal health conditions and persistent pain? This paper explores these issues by considering the current global health policy landscape, the role of global health networks, and progress and opportunities since the 2000-2010 Bone and Joint Decade for health policy to support improved musculoskeletal health and high-value musculoskeletal health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box 1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| | - Jeremy Shiffman
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe St., E8539, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States.
| | - Yusra Ribhi Shawar
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe St., E8539, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States.
| | - Kristina Åkesson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
| | - Nuzhat Ali
- Priority and Programmes Division, Health Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, Wellington House, 133- 155 Waterloo Road, Waterloo, SE1 8UG, United Kingdom.
| | - Anthony D Woolf
- Bone and Joint Research Group, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, TR1 3HD, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Risk-stratified and stepped models of care for back pain and osteoarthritis: are we heading towards a common model? Pain Rep 2020; 5:e843. [PMID: 33235943 PMCID: PMC7678800 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Substantial overlap between interventions and models of care for osteoarthritis and low back pain suggests potential for one common model, which may facilitate implementation. The overall quality of care for musculoskeletal pain conditions is suboptimal, partly due to a considerable evidence-practice gap. In osteoarthritis and low back pain, structured models of care exist to help overcome that challenge. In osteoarthritis, focus is on stepped care models, where treatment decisions are guided by response to treatment, and increasingly comprehensive interventions are only offered to people with inadequate response to more simple care. In low back pain, the most widely known approach is based on risk stratification, where patients with higher predicted risk of poor outcome are offered more comprehensive care. For both conditions, the recommended interventions and models of care share many commonalities and there is no evidence that one model of care is more effective than the other. Limitations of existing models of care include a lack of integrated information on social factors, comorbid conditions, and previous treatment experience, and they do not support an interplay between health care, self-management, and community-based activities. Moving forwards, a common model across musculoskeletal conditions seems realistic, which points to an opportunity for reducing the complexity of implementation. We foresee this development will use big data sources and machine-learning methods to combine stepped and risk-stratified care and to integrate self-management support and patient-centred care to a greater extent in future models of care.
Collapse
|
31
|
Chua J, Briggs AM, Hansen P, Chapple C, Abbott JH. Choosing interventions for hip or knee osteoarthritis - What matters to stakeholders? A mixed-methods study. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2020; 2:100062. [PMID: 36474681 PMCID: PMC9718175 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify what factors drive choices among interventions for hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to rank the characteristics of interventions. Methods In this phased, mixed-methods design involving cross-sectoral and multi-disciplinary stakeholders - healthcare consumers, providers, policy-makers, Māori health advocates and OA experts - we used the Nominal Group Technique in focus groups to generate data. We conducted thematic analysis of the focus group data to inform a framework of categories and sub-categories describing factors and characteristics influencing the choice of OA interventions. We then used a dual-panel, two-round e- Delphi survey to verify the framework and rank the characteristics of interventions. Results From six focus groups (n = 38 participants), 364 factors were identified and clustered into 56 themes (mean 9 themes per focus group; range 5-15). Thematic analysis revealed a framework of 3 core categories: characteristics of interventions (10 sub-categories), characteristics of consumers (10 sub-categories) and characteristics of the health system (7 sub-categories). In Delphi round 1, the framework was verified by each of two panels (n = 65, ≥80% acceptability). In round 2, two characteristics of interventions were combined, resulting in 9 characteristics (in decreasing order of importance): effectiveness, appropriateness, quality of the evidence, accessibility, harm, cost, duration, passivity, and immediacy of intervention effect. Conclusion Stakeholders make choices among interventions for hip or knee OA within a framework of characteristics of interventions, of consumers, and of the health system. We identified and ranked 9 key characteristics of interventions that stakeholders consider when choosing or recommending interventions for hip or knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Chua
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Andrew M. Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Australia
| | - Paul Hansen
- Department of Economics, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Cathy Chapple
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - J. Haxby Abbott
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bowden JL, Lamberts R, Hunter DJ, Melo LR, Mills K. Community-based online survey on seeking care and information for lower limb pain and injury in Australia: an observational study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035030. [PMID: 32690504 PMCID: PMC7371145 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Musculoskeletal pain is a leading cause of disability globally. In geographically and socioeconomically diverse countries, such as Australia, care seeking when someone experiences musculoskeletal pain is varied and potentially influenced by their individual characteristics, access to practitioners or perceived trustworthiness of information. This study explored how consumers currently access healthcare, how well it is trusted and if sociodemographic factors influenced healthcare utilisation. DESIGN Anonymous online observational survey. SETTING Australia. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of 831 community-based individuals (18+ years). OUTCOME MEASURES Descriptive analyses and generalised estimating equations were used to quantify healthcare-seeking behaviours, sources and trust of health information for (A) first-contact practitioners, (B) medical practitioners, and (C) other sources of information. RESULTS Of the 761 respondents, 73% were females, 54% resided in capital cities. 68% of respondents had experienced pain or injury in more than one lower limb joint. Despite this, more than 30% of respondents only sought help when there had not been natural resolution of their pain. Physiotherapists had the highest odds of being seen, asked and trusted for healthcare information. The odds of seeking care from general practitioners were no higher than seeking information from an expert website. Older individuals and women exhibited higher odds of seeking, asking and trusting health information. CONCLUSION Intelligible and trustworthy information must be available for consumers experiencing lower limb pain. Individuals, particularly younger people, are seeking information from multiple, unregulated sources. This suggests that healthcare professionals may need to invest time and resources into improving the trustworthiness and availability of healthcare information to improve healthcare quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn L Bowden
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rod Lamberts
- Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - David J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luciano Ricardo Melo
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sax Institute, Haymarket, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kathryn Mills
- Department of Health Professions, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Walker P, De Morgan S, Sanders D, Nicholas M, Blyth FM. Primary care initiatives focused on the secondary prevention and management of chronic pain: a scoping review of the Australian literature. Aust J Prim Health 2020; 26:273-280. [PMID: 32669195 DOI: 10.1071/py20092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this scoping review was to identify initiatives focused on the secondary prevention and management of chronic pain in Australian primary care to understand options available to Primary Health Networks and to identify evidence gaps. The Medline, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Cochrane databases, as well as relevant websites, were searched for eligible records published from 2007 to 2018. Initiative characteristics and outcomes evaluated were extracted and synthesised. In all, 84 initiatives from 167 published and grey literature records were identified, including: (1) consumer initiatives that aimed to improve access to multidisciplinary care, health literacy and care navigation (n=56); (2) health professional capacity building initiatives that aimed to ensure health professionals are skilled and provide best-practice evidence-based care (n=21); and (3) quality improvement and health system support initiatives (n=7). Evidence gaps were found relating to initiatives addressing the secondary prevention of chronic pain, those targeting vulnerable and regional populations, health professional capacity building initiatives for all primary health care providers and quality improvement and system support initiatives. Addressing evidence gaps related to effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation should be the focus for future chronic pain initiatives in primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pippy Walker
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre and Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - Simone De Morgan
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre and Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Duncan Sanders
- Pain Management Research Institute, Sydney Medical School - Northern, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Douglas Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Michael Nicholas
- Pain Management Research Institute, Sydney Medical School - Northern, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Douglas Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Fiona M Blyth
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building A27, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Burden of musculoskeletal disorders in Iran during 1990-2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15:103. [PMID: 32651719 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-00767-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs) are the leading cause of disability and facing them demands updated reports on their burden for efficient policymaking. We showed Iran had the highest female-to-male ratio and highest increase in the burden of musculoskeletal diseases, in the past three decades, worldwide. We further confirmed the role of population aging as the main cause. PURPOSE MSDs comprise most of the top causes of years lived with disability (YLDs) worldwide and are rapidly increasing in lower- and middle-income countries. Here, we present disability and mortality due to MSDs in Iran at the national level from 1990 to 2017. METHODS We used Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 Study data and standard methodology and presented the burden of MSDs in rates of years of life lost (YLLs), YLDs, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) during 1990-2017, for population aged ≥ 5 years old. We further explored attributable risk factors and decomposed the changing trend in DALYs to assess underlying causes. RESULTS In Iran, MSDs were responsible for 1.82 million (95%uncertainty interval [UI] 1.3-2.4) DALYs, in 2017. During the past 28 years, with 1.75% annualized percentage change (APC), Iran had the highest percentage increase in the all-ages MSD DALYs rate worldwide, while the age-standardized DALYs APC was negligible. Low back pain was the greatest contributor to DALYs and caused 4.5% of total DALYs. The female population is experiencing considerably higher burden of MSDs, with 115% and 48% higher all-ages YLLs and YLDs rates per 100,000, respectively (YLLs 28.7; YLDs 2629.1), than males (YLLs 13.2; YLDs 1766.1). However, due to wide UIs, difference was not significant. Only 17.6% of MSD YLDs are attributable to assessed risk factors. CONCLUSION Despite that MSDs are rising as an important cause of disability in Iran, these conditions are not sufficiently addressed in health policies. There is urgent need for cross-sectoral engagement, especially addressing the MSDs in females.
Collapse
|
35
|
Slater H, Stinson JN, Jordan JE, Chua J, Low B, Lalloo C, Pham Q, Cafazzo JA, Briggs AM. Evaluation of Digital Technologies Tailored to Support Young People's Self-Management of Musculoskeletal Pain: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18315. [PMID: 32442143 PMCID: PMC7305555 DOI: 10.2196/18315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital technologies connect young people with health services and resources that support their self-care. The lack of accessible, reliable digital resources tailored to young people with persistent musculoskeletal pain is a significant gap in the health services in Australia. Recognizing the intense resourcing required to develop and implement effective electronic health (eHealth) interventions, the adaptation of extant, proven digital technologies may improve access to pain care with cost and time efficiencies. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to test the acceptability and need for adaptation of extant digital technologies, the painHEALTH website and the iCanCope with Pain app, for use by young Australians with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS A 3-phased, mixed methods evaluation was undertaken from May 2019 to August 2019 in Australia. Young people aged 15 to 25 years with musculoskeletal pain for >3 months were recruited. Phases were sequential: (1) phase 1, participant testing (3 groups, each of n=5) of co-designed website prototypes compared with a control website (painHEALTH), with user tasks mapped to eHealth quality and engagement criteria; (2) phase 2, participants' week-long use of the iCanCope with Pain app with engagement data captured using a real-time analytic platform (daily check-ins for pain, interference, sleep, mood, physical activity, and energy levels; goal setting; and accessing resources); and (3) phase 3, semistructured interviews were conducted to gain insights into participants' experiences of using these digital technologies. RESULTS Fifteen young people (12/15, 80% female; mean age 20.5 [SD 3.3] years; range 15-25 years) participated in all 3 phases. The phase 1 aggregated group data informed the recommendations used to guide 3 rapid cycles of prototype iteration. Adaptations included optimizing navigation, improving usability (functionality), and enhancing content to promote user engagement and acceptability. In phase 2, all participants checked in, with the highest frequency of full check-ins attributed to pain intensity (183/183, 100.0%), pain interference (175/183, 95.6%), and mood (152/183, 83.1%), respectively. Individual variability was evident for monitoring progress with the highest frequency of history views for pain intensity (51/183, 32.3%), followed by pain interference (24/183, 15.2%). For the goals set feature, 87% (13/15) of participants set a total of 42 goals covering 5 areas, most frequently for activity (35/42, 83%). For phase 3, metasynthesis of qualitative data highlighted that these digital tools were perceived as youth-focused and acceptable. A total of 4 metathemes emerged: (1) importance of user-centered design to leverage user engagement; (2) website design (features) promoting user acceptability and engagement; (3) app functionality supporting self-management; and (4) the role of wider promotion, health professional digital prescriptions, and strategies to ensure longer-term engagement. CONCLUSIONS Leveraging extant digital tools, with appropriate user-informed adaptations, can help to build capacity tailored to support young people's self-management of musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Slater
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Jennifer N Stinson
- Lawrence S Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jason Chua
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Ben Low
- Squawk Designs, Perth, Australia
| | - Chitra Lalloo
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Quynh Pham
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph A Cafazzo
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Briggs AM, Persaud JG, Deverell ML, Bunzli S, Tampin B, Sumi Y, Amundsen O, Houlding EM, Cardone A, Hugosdottir T, Rogers S, Pozsgai M, Slater H. Integrated prevention and management of non-communicable diseases, including musculoskeletal health: a systematic policy analysis among OECD countries. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e001806. [PMID: 31565419 PMCID: PMC6747900 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Development and implementation of appropriate health policy is essential to address the rising global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The aim of this study was to evaluate existing health policies for integrated prevention/management of NCDs among Member States of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). We sought to describe policies' aims and strategies to achieve those aims, and evaluate extent of integration of musculoskeletal conditions as a leading cause of global morbidity. Methods Policies submitted by OECD Member States in response to a World Health Organization (WHO) NCD Capacity Survey were extracted from the WHO document clearing-house and analysed following a standard protocol. Policies were eligible for inclusion when they described an integrated approach to prevention/management of NCDs. Internal validity was evaluated using a standard instrument (sum score: 0-14; higher scores indicate better quality). Quantitative data were expressed as frequencies, while text data were content-analysed and meta-synthesised using standardised methods. Results After removal of duplicates and screening, 44 policies from 30 OECD Member States were included. Three key themes emerged to describe the general aims of included policies: system strengthening approaches; improved service delivery; and better population health. Whereas the policies of most countries covered cancer (83.3%), cardiovascular disease (76.6%), diabetes/endocrine disorders (76.6%), respiratory conditions (63.3%) and mental health conditions (63.3%), only half the countries included musculoskeletal health and pain (50.0%) as explicit foci. General strategies were outlined in 42 (95.5%) policies-all were relevant to musculoskeletal health in 12 policies, some relevant in 27 policies and none relevant in three policies. Three key themes described the strategies: general principles for people-centred NCD prevention/management; enhanced service delivery; and system strengthening approaches. Internal validity sum scores ranged from 0 to 13; mean: 7.6 (95% CI 6.5 to 8.7). Conclusion Relative to other NCDs, musculoskeletal health did not feature as prominently, although many general prevention/management strategies were relevant to musculoskeletal health improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jennifer G Persaud
- Arthritis and Osteoporosis Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marie L Deverell
- Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Samantha Bunzli
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brigitte Tampin
- Department of Physiotherapy, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Faculty of Business Management and Social Sciences, Hochschule Osnabrück, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Yuka Sumi
- Department of Ageing and Lifecourse, World Health Organization, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.,Kanagawa Prefectural Government, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Olav Amundsen
- The Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anontella Cardone
- European Cancer Patient Coalition, Brussels, Belgium.,UniTs, Universita' del Terzo Settore, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Miklós Pozsgai
- Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.,Zsigmondy Vilmos Spa and Balneological Hospital of Harkány, Harkány, Hungary
| | - Helen Slater
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Eyles JP, Hunter DJ, Bennell KL, Dziedzic KS, Hinman RS, van der Esch M, Holden MA, Bowden JL. Priorities for the effective implementation of osteoarthritis management programs: an OARSI international consensus exercise. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2019; 27:1270-1279. [PMID: 31163271 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Joint Effort Initiative was endorsed by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) in 2018 as a collaboration between international researchers and clinicians with an interest in the implementation of osteoarthritis management programs (OAMPs). This study aimed to identify and prioritise activities for future work of the Joint Effort Initiative. DESIGN A survey was emailed to delegates of the 2018 OARSI World Congress attending a pre-conference workshop or with a known interest in OAMPs (n = 115). Delegates were asked about the most important issues regarding OAMP implementation. The top 20 issues were synthesised into 17 action statements, and respondents were invited to participate in a priority ranking exercise to determine the order of importance of the statements. RESULTS Survey respondents (n = 51, 44%) were most commonly female (71%), with an allied health background (57%), affiliated with universities (73%) from Oceania (37%), and Europe/UK (45%). The five highest ranked action statements were: CONCLUSION: Prioritising statements will bring focus to the future work of the Joint Effort Initiative in the future and provide a basis for longer-term actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian P Eyles
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, And Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - David J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, And Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kim L Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Krysia S Dziedzic
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
| | - Rana S Hinman
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Martin van der Esch
- Reade Centre for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology Amsterdam, University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Melanie A Holden
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
| | - Jocelyn L Bowden
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, And Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Briggs AM, Page CJ, Shaw BR, Bendrups A, Philip K, Cary B, Choong PF. A Model of Care for Osteoarthritis of the Hip and Knee: Development of a System-Wide Plan for the Health Sector in Victoria, Australia. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 14:47-58. [PMID: 30710441 PMCID: PMC7008674 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) imposes a significant burden to the person, the health system and the community. Models of Care (MoCs) drive translation of evidence into policy and practice and provide a platform for health system reform. The Victorian MoC for OA of the hip and knee was developed following a best-practice framework, informed by best-evidence and iterative cross-sector consultation, including direct consumer consultation. Governance and external expert advisory committees consisting of local OA care champions facilitated the development and consultation processes. The MoC outlines key components of care, care that is not recommended, and suggests phased implementation strategies. This paper describes the MoC development process and lessons learned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- Professor, School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carolyn J Page
- Advanced Musculoskeletal Physiotherapist, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bridget R Shaw
- Past President Australian Physiotherapy Association, (Victorian Branch), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrea Bendrups
- Rheumatologist and medical educator, Australian Rheumatology Association, University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathleen Philip
- Chief Allied Health Advisor, Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Cary
- Physiotherapy Manager, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter F Choong
- Orthopaedic Surgeon, St Vincent's Hospital, Professor of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
System strengthening to support value-based care and healthy ageing for people with chronic pain. Pain 2019; 160:1240-1244. [DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
40
|
Health professionals and students encounter multi-level barriers to implementing high-value osteoarthritis care: a multi-national study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2019; 27:788-804. [PMID: 30668988 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Consistent evidence-practice gaps in osteoarthritis (OA) care are observed in primary care settings globally. Building workforce capacity to deliver high-value care requires a contemporary understanding of barriers to care delivery. We aimed to explore barriers to OA care delivery among clinicians and students. DESIGN A cross-sectional, multinational study sampling clinicians (physiotherapists, primary care nurses, general practitioners (GPs), GP registrars; total possible denominator: n = 119,735) and final-year physiotherapy and medical students (denominator: n = 2,215) across Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Respondents answered a survey, aligned to contemporary implementation science domains, which measured barriers to OA care using categorical and free-text responses. RESULTS 1886 clinicians and 1611 students responded. Items within the domains 'health system' and 'patient-related factors' represented the most applicable barriers experienced by clinicians (25-42% and 20-36%, respectively), whereas for students, 'knowledge and skills' and 'patient-related factors' (16-24% and 19-28%, respectively) were the most applicable domains. Meta-synthesis of qualitative data highlighted skills gaps in specific components of OA care (tailoring exercise, nutritional/overweight management and supporting positive behaviour change); assessment, measurement and monitoring; tailoring care; managing case complexity; and translating knowledge to practice (especially among students). Other barriers included general infrastructure limitations (particularly related to community facilities); patient-related factors (e.g., beliefs and compliance); workforce-related factors such as inconsistent care and a general knowledge gap in high-value care; and system and service-level factors relating to financing and time pressures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians and students encounter barriers to delivery of high-value OA care in clinical practice/training (micro-level); within service environments (meso-level); and within the health system (macro-level).
Collapse
|
41
|
Clark P, Denova-Gutiérrez E, Razo C, Rios-Blancas MJ, Lozano R. The burden of musculoskeletal disorders in Mexico at national and state level, 1990-2016: estimates from the global burden of disease study 2016. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:2745-2760. [PMID: 30242448 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4698-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Worldwide, musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders are the second cause of living with disability. According to our data, in Mexico, MSK conditions are an important cause of disability, at national and state level. Preventive actions promoted by health systems to reduce the burden of MSK disorders are essential. INTRODUCTION We describe premature mortality and disability due to musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders in Mexico at national and state level from 1990 to 2016. METHODS Using data from the global burden of disease study 2016 (GBD 2016), we present rates and trends in years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) caused by MSK disorders in Mexico by state from 1990 to 2016. The burden of MSK disorders was computed using standard GBD methodology. To compare the burden of MSK disorders across the country, states were grouped by sociodemographic index (SDI). RESULTS In Mexico, MSK disorders were the 3rd and 17th greatest cause of YLDs and YLLs in 2016, respectively, accounting for 1.95 million (95% UI 1.4-2.5) DALYs. Among all MSK disorders, low back and neck pain had the highest all-ages DALYs rate and represented 3.6% of total DALYs. All-ages YLLs and YLDs rates of MSK disorders were 234 and 37% higher in females (YLLs 102.2, 95% UI 79.9-110.7; YLDs 1677.9, 95% UI 1213.5-2209.4) than in males (YLLs 30.6, 95% UI 28.3-34.0; YLDs 1224.7, 95% UI 887.2-1608.3), respectively. Northern and high SDI states had higher rates of MSK disorders in comparison with southern and low SDI states. Only 16% of YLDs caused by all MSK disorders could be attributed to risk factors currently assessed in GBD. CONCLUSION MSK conditions are an important cause of premature mortality and disability. Researcher engagement and cross-sectorial actions to address the burden of MSK disorders are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Clark
- Clinical Epidemiology Research Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
- School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - E Denova-Gutiérrez
- Nutrition and Health Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, 655 Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, C.P, 62100, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
| | - C Razo
- National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | | | - R Lozano
- National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Blyth FM, Briggs AM, Schneider CH, Hoy DG, March LM. The Global Burden of Musculoskeletal Pain-Where to From Here? Am J Public Health 2018; 109:35-40. [PMID: 30495997 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2018.304747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 231] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
To summarize the current understanding of the global burden of musculoskeletal pain-related conditions, consider the process of evidence generation and the steps to generate global pain estimates, identify key gaps in our understanding, and propose an agenda to address these gaps, we performed a narrative review. In the 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD), which broadened the scope of musculoskeletal conditions that were included over previous rounds, low back pain imposed the highest disability burden of all specific conditions assessed, and subsequent GBD reports further reinforce the size of this burden. Over the past decade, the GBD has produced compelling evidence of the leading contribution of musculoskeletal pain conditions to the global burden of disability, but this has not translated into global health policy initiatives. However, system- and service-level responses to the disease burden persist across high-, middle-, and low-income settings. There is a mismatch between the burden of musculoskeletal pain conditions and appropriate health policy response and planning internationally that can be addressed with an integrated research and policy agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona M Blyth
- Fiona M. Blyth is with the Centre for Education and Research on Aging, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Andrew M. Briggs is with the School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Carmen Huckel Schneider is with the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney. Damian G. Hoy and Lyn M. March are with the Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Northern Clinical School and the Florance and Cope Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney
| | - Andrew M Briggs
- Fiona M. Blyth is with the Centre for Education and Research on Aging, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Andrew M. Briggs is with the School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Carmen Huckel Schneider is with the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney. Damian G. Hoy and Lyn M. March are with the Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Northern Clinical School and the Florance and Cope Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney
| | - Carmen Huckel Schneider
- Fiona M. Blyth is with the Centre for Education and Research on Aging, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Andrew M. Briggs is with the School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Carmen Huckel Schneider is with the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney. Damian G. Hoy and Lyn M. March are with the Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Northern Clinical School and the Florance and Cope Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney
| | - Damian G Hoy
- Fiona M. Blyth is with the Centre for Education and Research on Aging, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Andrew M. Briggs is with the School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Carmen Huckel Schneider is with the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney. Damian G. Hoy and Lyn M. March are with the Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Northern Clinical School and the Florance and Cope Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney
| | - Lyn M March
- Fiona M. Blyth is with the Centre for Education and Research on Aging, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Andrew M. Briggs is with the School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Carmen Huckel Schneider is with the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney. Damian G. Hoy and Lyn M. March are with the Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Northern Clinical School and the Florance and Cope Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gakhal NK. Can We Call a Model of Care a "Model" If We Cannot Measure Its Performance? J Rheumatol Suppl 2018; 45:1493-1494. [PMID: 30385693 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha K Gakhal
- Staff Rheumatologist, Division of Rheumatology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Briggs AM, Araujo de Carvalho I. Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0205533. [PMID: 30308077 PMCID: PMC6181385 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Integrated care is recognised as an important enabler to healthy ageing, yet few countries have managed to sustainably deliver integrated care for older people. We aimed to gather global consensus on the key actions required to realign health and long-term systems and integrate services to implement the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) approach. Methods A two-round eDelphi study, including a global consultation meeting, was undertaken to identify, refine and generate consensus on the actions required across high-, middle- and low-income countries to implement the WHO ICOPE approach. In round 1, a framework of 31 actions, empirically derived from previous WHO evidence reviews was presented to panellists to judge the relative importance of each action (numeric rating scale; range:1–9) and provide free-text comments concerning the scope of the actions. These outcomes were discussed and debated at the global consultation meeting. In round 2, a revised framework of 19 actions was presented to panellists to measure their extent of agreement and identify ‘essential’ actions (five-point Likert scale; range: strongly agree to strongly disagree). A threshold of ≥80% for agree/strongly agree was set a priori for consensus. Results After round 1 (n = 80 panellists), median scores across 31 actions ranged from 6 to 9. Based on pre-defined category thresholds for median scores, panellists considered 28 actions (90·3%) as ‘important’ and three (9·7%) as ‘uncertain’. Fifteen additional actions were suggested for inclusion based on free-text comments, creating 46 for consideration at the global consultation meeting. In round 2 (n = 84 panellists), agreement (agree or strongly agree) ranged from 84·6–97·6%, suggesting consensus. Fourteen (73·7%) actions were rated as essential. Conclusion Fourteen essential actions and five important actions are necessary at system (macro; n = 10) and service (meso; n = 9) levels to implement community-based integrated care for older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M. Briggs
- Department of Ageing and Life Course, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- * E-mail: (IAC); (AMB)
| | - Islene Araujo de Carvalho
- Department of Ageing and Life Course, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- * E-mail: (IAC); (AMB)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Inderjeeth CA, Raymond WD, Briggs AM, Geelhoed E, Oldham D, Mountain D. Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:1759-1770. [PMID: 29704027 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4526-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Fracture liaison service linked to an emergency department database effectively identifies patients with OP, improves best practice care, reduces recurrent fractures, and improves quality of life (QoL). The next step is to establish cost-effectiveness. This should be seen as the standard model of care. INTRODUCTION The Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care recommends implementation of a fracture liaison service (FLS) to manage patients with minimal trauma fractures (MTFs). This study evaluates the efficacy of a FLS linked to a tertiary hospital emergency department information system (EDIS) in reducing recurrent fractures. METHODS Patients aged ≥ 50 years with MTF identified from EDIS were invited to the FLS. Patient outcomes were compared to routine care (retrospective group-same hospital, and prospective group-other hospital) at 3- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS Two hundred forty-one of 376 (64.1%) eligible patients participated in the FLS with 12 months of follow-up. Absolute risk of recurrent MTF at 12 months was reduced by 9.2 and 10.2% compared with the prospective and retrospective controls, respectively. After age/sex adjustment, FLS participants had less MTF at 12 months vs. the retrospective controls, OR 0.38 (95%CI 0.18-0.79), but not the prospective controls, OR 0.40 (95%CI 0.16-1.01). FLS patients were more likely to receive the 'best practice' care, i.e. awareness of osteoporosis, investigations, and treatment (all p < 0.05). 'Fallers' (OR 0.48 (95%CI 0.24, 0.96)) and fall rates were lower in the FLS (p = 0.001) compared to the prospective control. FLS experienced the largest improvement in QoL from 3 to 12 months as measured by the EuroQoL 5-domain (EQ-5D) UK weighted score (+ 15 vs. - 11 vs. - 16%, p < 0.001) and EQ-5D Health State visual analogue scale (+ 29 vs. - 2 vs. + 1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients managed in a linked EDIS-FLS were more likely to receive the 'best practice' care and had lower recurrent MTF and improved QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Inderjeeth
- Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Australia.
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
- Arthritis and Osteoporosis Foundation of Western Australia, Shenton Park, Australia.
| | - W D Raymond
- Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
| | - E Geelhoed
- School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - D Oldham
- Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Australia
| | - D Mountain
- Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Leech RD, Eyles J, Batt ME, Hunter DJ. Lower extremity osteoarthritis: optimising musculoskeletal health is a growing global concern: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med 2018; 53:806-811. [PMID: 30030282 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The burden of non-communicable diseases, such as osteoarthritis (OA), continues to increase for individuals and society. Regrettably, in many instances, healthcare professionals fail to manage OA optimally. There is growing disparity between the strength of evidence supporting interventions for OA and the frequency of their use in practice. Physical activity and exercise, weight management and education are key management components supported by evidence yet lack appropriate implementation. Furthermore, a recognition that treatment earlier in the disease process may halt progression or reverse structural changes has not been translated into clinical practice. We have largely failed to put pathways and procedures in place that promote a proactive approach to facilitate better outcomes in OA. This paper aims to highlight areas of evidence-based practical management that could improve patient outcomes if used more effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Leech
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham, UK.,Academic Orthopaedics, Trauma and Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jillian Eyles
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark E Batt
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham, UK.,Centre for Sports Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - David J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hunter DJ, Hinman RS, Bowden JL, Egerton T, Briggs AM, Bunker SJ, Kasza J, Forbes AB, French SD, Pirotta M, Schofield DJ, Zwar NA, Bennell KL. Effectiveness of a new model of primary care management on knee pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Protocol for THE PARTNER STUDY. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19:132. [PMID: 29712564 PMCID: PMC5928565 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2048-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To increase the uptake of key clinical recommendations for non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and improve patient outcomes, we developed a new model of service delivery (PARTNER model) and an intervention to implement the model in the Australian primary care setting. We will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this model compared to usual general practice care. METHODS We will conduct a mixed-methods study, including a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial, with quantitative, qualitative and economic evaluations. We will recruit 44 general practices and 572 patients with knee OA in urban and regional practices in Victoria and New South Wales. The interventions will target both general practitioners (GPs) and their patients at the practice level. Practices will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio. Patients will be recruited if they are aged ≥45 years and have experienced knee pain ≥4/10 on a numerical rating scale for more than three months. Outcomes are self-reported, patient-level validated measures with the primary outcomes being change in pain and function at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 12 months. The implementation intervention will support and provide education to intervention group GPs to deliver effective management for patients with knee OA using tailored online training and electronic medical record support. Participants with knee OA will have an initial GP visit to confirm their diagnosis and receive management according to GP intervention or control group allocation. As part of the intervention group GP management, participants with knee OA will be referred to a centralised multidisciplinary service: the PARTNER Care Support Team (CST). The CST will be trained in behaviour change support and evidence-based knee OA management. They will work with patients to develop a collaborative action plan focussed on key self-management behaviours, and communicate with the patients' GPs. Patients receiving care by intervention group GPs will receive tailored OA educational materials, a leg muscle strengthening program, and access to a weight-loss program as appropriate and agreed. GPs in the control group will receive no additional training and their patients will receive usual care. DISCUSSION This project aims to address a major evidence-to-practice gap in primary care management of OA by evaluating a new service delivery model implemented with an intervention targeting GP practice behaviours to improve the health of people with knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617001595303 , date of registration 1/12/2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Rana S. Hinman
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Jocelyn L. Bowden
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Thorlene Egerton
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Andrew M. Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Stephen J. Bunker
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Jessica Kasza
- Biostatistics Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Andrew B. Forbes
- Biostatistics Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Simon D. French
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario Canada
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Marie Pirotta
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Deborah J. Schofield
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Nicholas A. Zwar
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia
| | - Kim L. Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Briggs AM, Woolf AD, Dreinhöfer K, Homb N, Hoy DG, Kopansky-Giles D, Åkesson K, March L. Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2018; 96:366-368. [PMID: 29875522 PMCID: PMC5985424 DOI: 10.2471/blt.17.204891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, 6845, Australia
| | - Anthony D Woolf
- Bone and Joint Research Office, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Cornwall, England
| | - Karsten Dreinhöfer
- Department for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Prevention and Health Service Research, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicole Homb
- Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Damian G Hoy
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Lyn March
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Briggs AM, Valentijn PP, Thiyagarajan JA, Araujo de Carvalho I. Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021194. [PMID: 29627819 PMCID: PMC5892746 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The World Health Organization (WHO) recently proposed an Integrated Care for Older People approach to guide health systems and services in better supporting functional ability of older people. A knowledge gap remains in the key elements of integrated care approaches used in health and social care delivery systems for older populations. The objective of this review was to identify and describe the key elements of integrated care models for elderly people reported in the literature. DESIGN Review of reviews using a systematic search method. METHODS A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and the Cochrane database in June 2017. Reviews of interventions aimed at care integration at the clinical (micro), organisational/service (meso) or health system (macro) levels for people aged ≥60 years were included. Non-Cochrane reviews published before 2015 were excluded. Reviews were assessed for quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 1 tool. RESULTS Fifteen reviews (11 systematic reviews, of which six were Cochrane reviews) were included, representing 219 primary studies. Three reviews (20%) included only randomised controlled trials (RCT), while 10 reviews (65%) included both RCTs and non-RCTs. The region where the largest number of primary studies originated was North America (n=89, 47.6%), followed by Europe (n=60, 32.1%) and Oceania (n=31, 16.6%). Eleven (73%) reviews focused on clinical 'micro' and organisational 'meso' care integration strategies. The most commonly reported elements of integrated care models were multidisciplinary teams, comprehensive assessment and case management. Nurses, physiotherapists, general practitioners and social workers were the most commonly reported service providers. Methodological quality was variable (AMSTAR scores: 1-11). Seven (47%) reviews were scored as high quality (AMSTAR score ≥8). CONCLUSION Evidence of elements of integrated care for older people focuses particularly on micro clinical care integration processes, while there is a relative lack of information regarding the meso organisational and macro system-level care integration strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- Department of Ageing and Life Course, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Pim P Valentijn
- Department of Patient and Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Integrated Care Evaluation, Essenburgh Research & Consultancy, Hierden, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Slater H, Campbell JM, Stinson JN, Burley MM, Briggs AM. End User and Implementer Experiences of mHealth Technologies for Noncommunicable Chronic Disease Management in Young Adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e406. [PMID: 29233804 PMCID: PMC5743925 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) such as asthma, diabetes, cancer, and persistent musculoskeletal pain impose an escalating and unsustainable burden on young people, their families, and society. Exploring how mobile health (mHealth) technologies can support management for young people with NCDs is imperative. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify, appraise, and synthesize available qualitative evidence on users' experiences of mHealth technologies for NCD management in young people. We explored the perspectives of both end users (young people) and implementers (health policy makers, clinicians, and researchers). METHODS A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Eligibility criteria included full reports published in peer-reviewed journals from January 2007 to December 2016, searched across databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and PsycINFO. All qualitative studies that evaluated the use of mHealth technologies to support young people (in the age range of 15-24 years) in managing their chronic NCDs were considered. Two independent reviewers identified eligible reports and conducted critical appraisal (based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument: JBI-QARI). Three reviewers independently, then collaboratively, synthesized and interpreted data through an inductive and iterative process to derive emergent themes across the included data. External validity checking was undertaken by an expert clinical researcher and for relevant content, a health policy expert. Themes were subsequently subjected to a meta-synthesis, with findings compared and contrasted between user groups and policy and practice recommendations derived. RESULTS Twelve studies met our inclusion criteria. Among studies of end users (N=7), mHealth technologies supported the management of young people with diabetes, cancer, and asthma. Implementer studies (N=5) covered the management of cognitive and communicative disabilities, asthma, chronic self-harm, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Quality ratings were higher for implementer compared with end user studies. Both complementary and unique user themes emerged. Themes derived for end users of mHealth included (1) Experiences of functionality that supported self-management, (2) Acceptance (technical usability and feasibility), (3) Importance of codesign, and (4) Perceptions of benefit (self-efficacy and empowerment). For implementers, derived themes included (1) Characteristics that supported self-management (functional, technical, and behavior change); (2) Implementation challenges (systems level, service delivery level, and clinical level); (3) Adoption considerations for specific populations (training end users; specific design requirements); and (4) Codesign and tailoring to facilitate uptake and person-centered care. CONCLUSIONS Synthesizing available data revealed both complementary and unique user perspectives on enablers and barriers to designing, developing, and implementing mHealth technologies to support young people's management of their chronic NCDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42017056317; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD 42017056317 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vZ5UkKLp).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Slater
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Jared M Campbell
- Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jennifer N Stinson
- Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Megan M Burley
- Health Networks, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|