Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of chicken litter with agricultural and food wastes: A case study on the effect of carbon/nitrogen ratio, substrates mixing ratio and organic loading

A robust, low-temperature, closed-loop anaerobic system for high-solid mixed farm wastes: advancing agricultural waste management solutions in Canada

This study investigates the effectiveness of low-temperature (20 ± 1 °C) anaerobic digestion (AD) for two organic multiple farm substrate combinations: Set 1 comprising chicken manure (CM), dairy manure (DM), and waste corn silage (CS) and Set 2 comprising CM, DM, pig manure (PM), and CS. Inoculum adaptation steps were carried out using CM and CM+DM for Set 1 and Set 2, respectively. Over three consecutive operating cycles spanning 245 days with increasing organic loads, 4.3 and 2.8 g VS L-1 d-1 for Sets 1 and 2 during Cycles 1 to 5.1 and 4.6 g VS L-1 d-1for Sets 1 and 2 during Cycle 3, a closed-loop two-stage liquid-solid AD system was employed, with performance assessed via stability ratios of short-chain volatile fatty acids and alkalinity. Results demonstrate that mono-digestion of CM with adapted inoculum yielded the highest biogas production of 424 ± 4 L over 77 days, indicating superior performance by Set 1 during Phase I, whereas a similar performance was observed during Phase 2, where Sets 1 and 2 exhibited highest specific methane yields of 0.233 ± 0.028 and 0.262 ± 0.004 L g-1 VSfed, respectively, over 68 days. Analysis of heavy metal concentrations in digestates revealed a significant decrease compared to initial raw substrate concentrations, highlighting their role as nutrients for microbial growth. This study, the first of its kind, highlights the potential of low-temperature AD systems to manage diverse organic residues/byproducts and offers insights into effective performance monitoring without compromising system integrity.

Employing micro-aeration in anaerobic digestion of poultry litter and wheat straw: Batch kinetics and continuous performance

In this study, different micro-aeration (MA) strategies for anaerobic digestion (AD) of poultry litter (PL) and wheat straw (WS) were examined. MA at different stages (pretreatment, middle, pretreatment plus middle, and daily) in batch AD of WS showed that daily MA had the highest increase (16.5 %) of the cumulative methane yield (CMY) compared to the control. Batch co-digestion (Co-AD) of WS and PL with daily MA obtained a furtherly improved (15.1 %) CMY of 225.44 N mL CH₄/g vS _added. The modified Gompertz model and Cone model were good in fitting the methane yield kinetics of MA engaged AD process (R² greater than 0.99). Daily MA shortened the lag phase of Co-AD by 3.4 %. The sequencing batch reactor for the Co-AD of WS and PL showed an increased (21.5 %) daily methane yield when 0.5-h/d MA was employed. The results provided support for the application of micro-aeration in the AD of agricultural wastes.

Combined anaerobic digestion of chicken manure and corn straw: study on methanogenic potential and microbial diversity

Purpose

To explore the methane production potential and microbial community changes of combined anaerobic digestion of chicken manure and corn straw. Increase methane production, reduce the environmental pollution caused by the burning of livestock manure and straw, and provide some theoretical references for the construction and operation of actual biogas projects.

Methods

Different proportions (3%, 5%, 10%) of corn straw were added to the anaerobic digestion systems of chicken manure in order to improve the C/N ratio and to evaluate the feasibility and potential synergistic effect on the co-digestion. The key point was to use 16S rDNA sequencing to analyze the relationship between the microbial diversity and the hydrolase activity during the anaerobic digestion.

Result

The results showed that the volumetric gas production of methane in the 3% straw addition group was 227.66 ml/gVS, which was 18% higher than the cumulative methane production in the pure chicken manure experimental group. However, with the increase of straw concentration, methane production and the utilization rate of the raw materials continued to decrease. The change in activity of each hydrolase was in agreement with changes in hydrolytic acidifying bacteria, and the activity of the main hydrolase also increased with the addition of straw; the correlation coefficient was 0.9943. Sequencing results showed that the dominant strains of methanogenic archaea were Methanosarcina, Methanosaeta, Methanobacterium, and Methanospirillum. Mainly for hydrogen-eating, acetic acid-eating methanogens, its role is to use H2, methanol and acetic acid, and other substances to metabolize methane, and convert it into CH4 and CO2.

Conclusion

The addition of a small amount of straw enhanced the production capacity of hydrogen-nutritive methane to some extent, and the species richness and evenness were also improved, reducing the pollution caused by livestock manure to the environment while controlling the pollution caused by straw burning.

Graphical Abstract

Recent advances in conductive materials amended anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and municipal organic solid waste: Roles, mechanisms, and potential application

Recently, conductive materials (i.e., carbon-based and iron-based materials) as a feasible and attractive approach have been introduced to anaerobic co-digestion (ACoD) system for promoting its performance and stability through direct interspecies electron transfer. Owing to the key roles of conductive materials in ACoD process, it is imperative to gain a profound understanding of their specific functions and mechanisms. Here, this review critically examined the state of the art of conductive materials assisted ACoD of food waste and common municipal organic solid waste. Then, the fundamental roles of conductive materials on ACoD enhancement and the relevant mechanisms were discussed. Last, the perspectives for co-digestate treatment, reutilization, and disposal were summarized. Moreover, the main challenges to conductive materials amended ACoD in on-site application were proposed and the future remarks were put forward. Collectively, this review poses a scientific basis for the potential application of conductive materials in ACoD process in the future.

Semi-solid state promotes the methane production during anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure with corn straw comparison to wet and high-solid state

Total solid content (TS) is an important factor for biogas production during anaerobic digestion. In this study, we explored the influence of different TS (5% wet, 15% semi-solid and 25% solid state) on the relative cumulative methane production (RCMP) during anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure with corn straw. Results showed that total ammonium nitrogen and free ammonia nitrogen concentration increased with the increase of TS. Ammonium nitrogen in treatments at 15% TS was 2.25-2.76 times as high as that at 5% TS, which was below 3 times. The highest chemical oxygen demand removal and RCMP were obtained in the treatment of 15% TS with a ratio of 2:1 chicken manure: corn straw (based on TS). The RCMP in the treatments of 15% TS were 3.63-4.59 times higher than that of 5% TS based on the volume of substrates. The abundance of Caldicoprobacter improving the degradation of corn straw was significantly positively correlated with the RCMP, and the average abundance of Caldicoprobacter at 15% TS was 8.33 and 7.02 times higher than that at 5% and 25% TS, respectively. Structural equation models analysis suggested that TS significantly impacted the RCMP by indirectly impacting free ammonia nitrogen and microbial abundance. These findings indicated semi-solid state (15% TS) decreased ammonia nitrogen releasing and improved the abundance of Caldicoprobacter, and increased RCMP during anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure with corn straw.

Kinetic model discrimination on the biogas production in thermophilic co-digestion of sugarcane vinasse and water hyacinth

Co-digestion between sugarcane vinasse (Vn) and water hyacinth (WH) at various mixing ratios of 0:1, 1:0, 1:3, 3:1, and 1:1 was carried out under thermophilic conditions (55 °C) for 60 days. The effect of various mixing ratios on the pH changes, soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) reduction, and cumulative biogas production was investigated. The first order, modified Gompertz, and logistic function kinetic models were selected to fit the experimental data. Model discrimination was conducted through the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The study revealed that co-digestion shows better performance compared to the mono-digestion of both substrates. Vn:WH mixing ratio 1:1 with inoculum to substrate ratio (ISR) of 0.38 g VS_inoculum/g VS_substrate is the most favorable ratio, achieving sCOD reduction efficiency and cumulative biogas production of 71.6% and 1229 mL, respectively. Model selection through AIC revealed that ratio 1:1 was best fitted to the logistic function kinetic model (R² = 0.9897) with Y_m and K values of 1232 mL and 31 mL/day, respectively.

Start-up of co-digestion of poultry litter and wheat straw in anaerobic sequencing batch reactor by gradually increasing organic loading rate: Methane production and microbial community analysis

Anaerobic co-digestion (ACoD) of poultry litter (PL) and wheat straw (WS) in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) for continuous bio-energy generation was started up for the first time by gradually increasing the organic loading rate (OLR). A steady-state was reached with a daily biogas production of (13.06 ± 0.21) L and methane content of (54.38 ± 0.53) %. The subsequent regular operation achieved a daily methane yield of (100.41-188.65) mL CH₄/g VS added and a total chemical oxygen demand (tCOD) removal rate of (70.3-85.9) % in the effluent under different operating parameters. The overall microbial community became more uniform, and the dominant aceticlastic methanogen of Methanosaeta was enriched after the start-up. While the microbial community was largely stable in the overall structure since the regular operation. Therefore, the start-up of the ACoD of PL and WS was successful with stable and continuous methane production.

Effects of organic loading rates on high-solids anaerobic digestion of food waste in horizontal flow reactor: Methane production, stability and mechanism

To maximize the methane production efficiency of high-solids anaerobic digestion (HSAD) of food waste (FW), a horizontal flow reactor was operated under mesophilic, semi-continuous condition at organic loading rates (OLRs) ranging from 1.00 to 13.80 kg-VS/(m³ d). The gas production, substrate transformation, and microbial community characteristics of the horizontal flow HSAD reactor were evaluated. The results indicated that the methane yield (0.173-0.516 L/(g d)) fluctuated with the increasing OLR, volumetric methane production rate (0.25-5.69 L/(L d)) increased with increasing OLR, and the volatile solids (VS) reduction rate ranged between 83.30% and 93.05%. The relationship of biogas or methane production with OLR and HRT in the horizontal flow HSAD reactor were characterized with an empirical equation. The concentrations of soluble COD and volatile fatty acid exhibited significant fluctuations, and free ammonia-nitrogen peaked at the OLR of 13.80 kg-VS/(m³ d). Microbial community analysis revealed that the methanogenic metabolic pathway changes along the propelling direction of the horizontal flow HSAD reactor from CH₃COOH and H₂/CO₂ pathways to CH₃COOH, H₂/CO₂, and H₂/methyl co-dominant pathways. These results provide theoretical support for stable methane production from FW and deeper insight into horizontal flow HSAD for FW treatment.

Evaluation of methane production from the anaerobic co-digestion of manure of guinea pig with lignocellulosic Andean residues

The objective of this research was to evaluate anaerobic co-digestion of guinea pig manure (GP) with Andean agricultural residues such as amaranth (AM), quinoa (QU) and wheat (TR) in batch biodigesters under mesophilic conditions (37 ⁰C) for 40 days. As microbial inoculum, sewage treatment sludge was used in two inoculum/substrate ratios (ISR of 1 and 2). In terms of methane production, the best results occurred in treatments containing AM and QU as co-substrate and an ISR of 2. Thus, the highest methane production yield in the GP:AM biodigesters (25:75) and GP:QU (25:75) with 341.86 mlCH₄/g VS added and 341.05 mlCH₄/g VS added, respectively. On the other hand, the results showed that methane production with an ISR of 2 generated higher yields for guinea pig waste and the methane fraction of the biogas generated was in a range from 57 to 69%. Methane production kinetics from these raw materials was studied using five kinetic models: modified Gompertz, logistic equation, transfer, cone and Richards. The cone model adjusted best to the experimental values ​​with those observed with r² of 0.999 and RMSE of 1.16 mlCH₄/g VS added. Finally, the highest biodegradability (experimental yield/theoretical yield) was obtained in the GP-AM biodigesters (25:75) with 67.92%.

Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions

This study proposed the selection of cost-effective additives generated from different activity sectors to enhance and stabilize the start-up, as well as the transitional phases, of semi-continuous food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion. The results showed that combining agricultural waste mixtures including wheat straw (WS) and cattle manure (CM) boosted the process performance and generated up to 95% higher methane yield compared to the control reactors (mono-digested FW) under an organic loading rate (OLR) range of 2 to 3 kg VS/m³·d. Whereas R3 amended with unmarketable biochar (UBc), to around 10% of the initial fresh mass inserted, showed a significant process enhancement during the transitional phase, and more particularly at an OLR of 4 kg VS/m³·d, it was revealed that under these experimental conditions, FW reactors including UBc showed an increase of 144% in terms of specific biogas yield (SBY) compared to FW reactors fed with agricultural residue. Hence, both agricultural and industrial waste were efficacious when it came to boosting either FW anaerobic performance or AD effluent quality. Although each co-substrate performed under specific experimental conditions, this feature provides decision makers with diverse alternatives to implement a sustainable organic waste management system, conveying sufficient technical details to draw up appropriate designs for the recovery of various types of organic residue.

Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives

Anaerobic digestion is a long-established technology for the valorization of diverse organic wastes with concomitant generation of valuable resources. However, mono-digestion (i.e., anaerobic digestion using one feedstock) suffers from challenges associated with feedstock characteristics. Co-digestion using multiple feedstocks provides the potential to overcome these limitations. Significant research and development efforts have highlighted several inherent merits of co-digestion, including enhanced digestibility due to synergistic effects of co-substrates, better process stability, and higher nutrient value of the produced co-digestate. However, studies focused on the underlying effects of diverse co-feedstocks on digester performance and stability have not been synthesized so far. This review fills this gap by highlighting the limitations of mono-digestion and critically examining the benefits of co-digestion. Furthermore, this review discusses synergistic effect of co-substrates, characterization of microbial communities, the prediction of biogas production via different kinetic models, and highlights future research directions for the development of a sustainable biorefinery.

Decentralized energy from portable biogas digesters using domestic kitchen waste: A review

Anaerobic digestion is one of the main waste-to-energy technologies in reducing the volume of biodegradable waste into energy-rich biogas. Recent studies have revealed that kitchen wastes as a feedstock possess great potential in energy production and anaerobic digestion proved to be a promising technology among different kitchen waste management techniques such as incineration, pyrolysis, gasification, landfills, composting, etc. To anaerobically treat feedstock, an airtight enclosed container commonly known as biodigester will be employed. To suffice the energy requirement for cooking in the rural areas and recently even in the urban areas, a small-scale biogas unit commonly referred to as portable type biodigester is blooming as an attractive alternative for the production of biogas domestically. Hence, this review emphasizes on anaerobic digestion of kitchen wastes and the design of portable type biodigester. The present review provides an overview of different kitchen waste management techniques. The paper also discusses the different types of biomass feedstock and provides a generalized procedure for the design of a portable biogas unit. This study confirms that the systematic design of biogas units and proper feeding of kitchen waste offers an advantage of effective utilization of wastes in the production of decentralized energy.

Food-processing wastes

Literature published in 2018 and literature published in 2019 related to food-processing wastes treatment for industrial applications are reviewed. This review is a subsection of the Treatment Systems section of the annual Water Environment Federation literature review and covers the following food-processing industries and applications: general, meat and poultry, fruits and vegetables, dairy and beverage, and miscellaneous treatment of food wastes. PRACTITIONER POINTS: This article summarizes literature reviews published in 2018 and in 2019 related to food processing wastes treatment for industrial applications are reviewed. This review is a subsection of the Treatment Systems section of the annual Water Environment Federation literature review and covers the following food processing industries and applications: general, meat and poultry, fruits and vegetables, dairy and beverage, and miscellaneous treatment of food wastes.

Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with cellulose, protein, and lipids: Role of rheology and digestibility

Rheology is known to have an impact on the performance of digesters, but the effect of additional substrates (co-digestion) is poorly understood. The main objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the addition of cellulose, protein and lipids to substrates on the rheological behaviour and biogas production of the mixture of primary sludge (PS) and waste-activated sludge (WAS) in a batch system. A mixture of PS and WAS to form the main substrate was anaerobically co-digested with different types of organic matter (cellulose, protein and lipids) as co-substrates at different co-substrate to main substrate ratios of 2-8 (wt%) under mesophilic conditions and below ammonia inhibition levels. Yield stress (τ_y) and the flow consistency index (k) of the combined feed in the case of cellulose and protein were significantly dependent on the amount of co-substrate added, while there was an insignificant impact on these properties when lipids were added. Cellulose significantly increased τ_y and k in the feed, which resulted in poor fluidity and the improper homogenisation of the digester content, and consequently decreased the biogas yield. In contrast, the biogas yield was improved through the addition of 2% to 6% protein despite an increase in τ_y and k of the feed, but the methane yield decreased at 7% and 8% levels of protein concentration. This observation indicates that the threshold for τ_y and k of the digester media depends on the organic nature and digestibility of the substrate. There was no significant impact on the flow properties of the initial mixture when lipids were added, and their addition increased the biogas yield. A first-order kinetic reaction model was used for predicting the yield of methane from these digesters. The rate constant values revealed an increasing trend, with the highest for protein then lipids then cellulose.

Methane yields during anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstocks: A meta-analysis

Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstocks (aka co-digestion) is increasingly being used to enhance methane yield and organic waste management. The benefits accruing from co-digestions compared to mono-digestions, however, vary greatly in the literature. The goal of this research was to use meta-analysis to critically compare methane yields between mono- and co-digestions and identify relevant factors (co-substrate type, substrate dose, carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio, volatile solids (VS), substrate pH, organic loading rate (OLR), and hydraulic retention time (HRT)) contributing to methane yield. Published studies (n = 64 representing 384 case-studies) with sufficient detail on methane yield were identified for the meta-analysis. Analysis indicated that co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstocks significantly increased methane yield (249 L kg^-1[VS]), compared with anaerobic mono-digestion of animal manure (171 L kg^-1[VS]). Similar methane yields increases (47-57 L kg^-1[VS]) were obtained from co-digestions in batch reactors of swine (238-287 L kg^-1[VS]), poultry (213-260 L kg^-1[VS]), and cattle manure (147-204 L kg^-1[VS]). In continuous digesters of cattle manure (175-299 L kg^-1[VS]) co-digestion had the greatest methane yield improvement of 124 L kg^-1[VS], swine manure (212-322 L kg^-1[VS]) co-digestion ranked second with 110 L kg^-1[VS], and poultry manure ranked third with 70 L kg^-1[VS]. Improved methane yield were obtained at optimum C/N ratio ranging from 26 to 34. The respective optimum OLR for co-digestion of swine, poultry, and cattle manure were 1.2, 1.4 and 3.4 kg VS m^-3 d^-1, while the recommended HRT was 30-40 d. Taken together, anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstock significantly improved anaerobic digestion. Factors contributing to methane yields included: substrate-type and dose, VS, C/N, OLR, and HRT.

Trace Element Supplementation and Enzyme Addition to Enhance Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Litter

Anaerobic digestion (AD) of chicken litter (CL) is a viable alternative to disposal. However, methane yields from this primarily organic waste are quite low when mono-digested. This paper discusses the effect of an enzyme cocktail, trace element (TE) supplementation and selenium (Se) addition in small-scale batch biomethane potential (BMP) assays to enhance the AD of CL. Eleven different assays were set up in triplicate including assays containing only inoculum (blank), only CL (negative control) and cellulose and inoculum (positive control). The results indicate that both enzyme treatment and trace element supplementation enhanced the biogas and methane yield. The highest specific biogas and methane yields were noted for 1% enzyme-treated CL of 835.2 L/kg volatile solids (VS) and 460.8 L/kg VS, respectively. Usually, mono-digestion of CL is low due to high nitrogen content and the presence of recalcitrant lignocellulosic material from the bedding material. Enzyme treatment performed better than the addition of the TE mix and Se.

Modelization of anaerobic processes during co-digestion of slowly biodegradable substrates

The influence of the soluble substrates over the anaerobic processes has been extensively investigated, but little is known about the effects of particulate substrate. The biodegradation of these substrates starts with the hydrolytic step, this process is slower than the other ones involved in the biodegradation of particulate substrates and usually becomes the rate-limiting step. This study investigate the effect of the initial total solids (TS) concentration on the anaerobic co-digestion of two slowly biodegradable organic substrates. The wastes mixtures were prepared at different dilutions in the range from 10% to 28% TS. From these experiments it was observed that as TS concentration increased, the methane production decreased. These results were modelled and it was observed that neither hydrolysis nor fermentation stages controlled the methane production rate. Being a substrate inhibition event experienced at the methanogenic stage the responsible of the lower methane production when operating at high TS concentrations.

Mitigating excessive ammonia nitrogen in chicken farm flushing wastewater by mixing strategy for nutrient removal and lipid accumulation in the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana

This study aimed to evaluate algal growth, lipid production, and nutrient removal in chicken farm flushing wastewater (CFFW). The excessive ammonia nitrogen (EAN) content in the CFFW wastewater represented a major factor limiting the algal growth. A strategy of mixing CFFW with municipal wastewater (MW) that contained less ammonia nitrogen was adopted. The results showed that the mixed wastewaters reduced ammonia nitrogen content, balanced nutrient profile, and promoted biomass production. The residual nutrients in mixed wastewaters were significantly reduced due to the algal absorption. Furthermore, alga grown on mixed wastewaters accumulated a higher level of total lipids and monounsaturated fatty acids that can be used for biodiesel production. The key issue of low biomass yield of algal grown on CFFW due to the inhibition of EAN was efficiently resolved by mitigating limiting factor to algal growth basing on mixing strategy, and accordingly the nutrients in the wastewater were significantly removed.

Feeding control of anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and corn silage performed by rule-based PID control with ADM1

Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of corn silage (CS) and waste activated sludge (WAS) co-substrates, compared with anaerobic digestion (AD) of mono-substrate WAS, was simulated under mesophilic conditions with the adapted IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1), and a rule-based PID control system for control of the AcoD of CS and WAS, through control of their ratios in the feed, was developed, implemented with the model as a test platform. Tests on AcoD of co-substrates were conducted at the COD mass-based feeding ratios of CS to WAS 1:2.5, 1:2.0 and 1:1.2. The maximal biogas production was 0.94 m³/kgVS·d at the feeding ratio 1:1.2. The ADM1 was adapted, and the high-sensitivity kinetic parameters were calibrated and optimised using the data from the tests of steady state mono-digestion of WAS and AcoD of CS and WAS. The simulated data of biogas and methane production, methane content, VFA and pH agreed well with the test data. The rule-based PID control was developed with an additional expert system, in which the lower level controller operated the level of VFA/TIC and the upper level controller manipulated the setpoints of methane production. The feeding ratio of CS to WAS was used as a manipulated variable. With the constraint boundaries, the test on the control system showed that it could keep methane production stable to the setpoint and maximise methane production while resisting the disturbances to AcoD by adjusting the feeding ratios of CS to WAS.

Treatment of feces from beef cattle fed the enteric methane inhibitor 3-nitrooxypropanol

The study evaluated the residual effect of the known enteric methane inhibitor 3-nitrooxypropanol (3NOP) on anaerobic digestion of cattle feces (feces) in a CH₄ potential batch test and two consecutive runs of an anaerobic leach bed reactor at a solids retention time of 40 days. The feces used in this study were collected from beef cattle fed forage- (backgrounding) or grain- (finishing) based diets supplemented with 3NOP in feedlot and metabolism studies. The results showed that CH₄ yields were not significantly different from treatments using control feces and feces collected from cattle fed a diet supplemented with 3NOP in both CH₄ potential and leach bed studies. Spiking feces with 200 mg 3NOP kg^-1 dry matter decreased CH₄ production rate by 8.0-18.1% estimated from the Gompertz equation, increased the lag phase time (0.4-3.4 d) in all the treatments, while there was no significant difference in the overall CH₄ yield. Results from this study showed that 3NOP can be used as an effective enteric CH₄ inhibitor with no residual effect on anaerobic digestion.

Effect of pre-treatment on sequential anaerobic co-digestion of chicken litter with agricultural and food wastes under semi-solid conditions and comparison with wet anaerobic digestion

Sequential co-digestion batch assays were conducted using feedstocks of chicken litter (CL), food waste (FW) and wheat straw (WS) mixed to a C/N ratio of 26.5 and 15% TS. Untreated mixture produced biogas of 321.6 ± 13.4 mL_N/g VS_added which improved up to 50% when either CL or WS pre-treated substrates were fed. However, when both pre-treated CL and WS were fed, 80% and 88% increase in total biogas were found with associated VS removal of 49% and 55%, respectively, for alkali and sequential acid pre-treatment. Also, reactors received pre-treated substrates showed reduction in ammonia and digestate cellulose fraction with an increase in water soluble contents. Biogas production using sequential AD at 15% was almost 38% less than BMP biogas at 4%, however this was negated with the pre-treatment indicating that co-digestion at high TS of 15% is achievable. Further testing is required to confirm these results under semi-continuous conditions.